th-cam.com/video/s-pZZvcZnY8/w-d-xo.html Ummm I made this viewable for y’all - it’s about my mind and brain dueling and taking away my consciousness from my externality and making it see inside “the dome” as a savant syndrome + anemia symptom - I was anemic when it happened and it hasn’t happened as strongly since - it took me from a well lit shower into a black dome.
I worked as a neuropsychiatry research assistant in the 80's and they weren't even scratching the surface of this stuff. I'm fascinated and she's a wonderful teacher.
Me encanta con la pasión amor alegria que explica Dr Nancy Kanwisher quisiera que así explicaran en la Universidad las clases se hacen tan interesantes gracias por aportar a la sociedad con tanto conocimiento y profesionalismo un saludo y un gran abrazo desde Ecuador Dr es una magnánime eminencia 👍📖👏👏
Well, I wish I had the notes in my hand. But this was very informative and very helpful. Prof Kanwisher is a lovely lady, she's brilliant at teaching. Big thank out to her and MIT for uploading this. Success to you and May God be with you. Cheers.
This is really a big help in teaching my students with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) & other health impairments 🙏🏽 Maraming Salamat po 🇵🇭🙏🏽✍️📓📚
Most Important it’s about public safety…. Not okay to talk on phone if it may cause danger to the public. Okay to talk on phone if it does not cause danger to the public… Yes to no, and yes to yes both exist within some space, where safety exist and space where danger to public safety exist.. depending on the space where actions occur..
Houses versus faces: Possibly it also has to do with what's changing. A face could change and interact with the observer, a house just basically is, unless something is going on with the house, then the attention might be on the house and not the face.
awareness here seems to be more or less the same as covert attention, except you can't always control it still doesn't explain why you can actually subjectively feel whatever the brain is currently aware of
General attention and focused attention: General attention, to what level? All levels simultaneously? The very nature of reality to everything that is being observed and interacted with, from specific energy interactions to the macro universal levels? Or focused attention, what am I really interested in at this specific time of my existence? But then also, what about the context of what I am focusing on? Context can change a focused attention.
Individual awareness depends on their attention capability. The brain filters input relevant and irrelevant unique to each individual. This neural network is created through neural motor development which depends on how we experience our primary movements. Movement is necessary to build myelin sheath which is necessary to carry impulse.
I’m concerned about the idea that attention in this context is all about sensory perceptive detection… I use the word attention to mean attending not neccessarily related to a sensory or specifically visual input… interesting…
Question: It is known that solar flares and incoming cosmic radiation can affect a person's brain. How exactly do such events affect a person's brain? (Positive and negative effects).
On what level are you asking? Be specific. Are you asking which mechanism is specifically affected? Truth is we don’t have tons of studies but I would suggest reading reviews first with SEP exposure. I’m not an expert at all but it’s an easy search. From there, go directly to the original research that intrigues you (aka down the rabbit hole) I also like reading about EMFs and the affects it has on the neurotransmitters / VGCC activation. (increase Intracellular calcium) I’d say narrow the focus on the question maybe? Decrease in White matter? Activation of Amy? Hormones? Psychiatric disorders Memory retention Attention Cognitive based research measuring intelligence The list goes on lol
@@Brandi.Nicole All the above and more. Via QED whereby 'em' interacts with electrons in atoms and molecules and QCD whereby 'em' interacts with the nucleus of atoms, dependent primarily on the energy frequencies involved, and dependent upon what specific atoms and molecules were in and around the brain and body, would help dictate what exactly would occur. In addition, any stray electrons and stray protons could also affect the brain and body. And then also, "IF" my TOE idea is correct, and the gravity test has to be accomplished to verify if that portion of the TOE idea is correct, but 'if' true, then 'em' and gravity are also interrelated as well as most probably the 'gem' photon being the energy unit of this universe that makes up everything in existence in this universe. Often when I post the TOE idea and longer gravity test here on YT, it often gets blocked. But here is the really short version of the gravity test, (of which I do not currently have a high powered laser laying around doing nothing, much less 3, at least one of which would be required for the test so as to have enough energy to discern the gravitational black hole to prove the concept as being correct). Gravity test: Very Short Version: Counter-act the 'em' of a laser with 'em' and gravity will be left.
This is your brain 'B', this is your brain in a box ['B']. It only has itself to deal with until sensory inputs come into it. (And sensory inputs are limited in actual reality). Plus, our brain likes to make stuff up to fill in the gaps of it's perceived reality. But also, where does the stuff come from that the brain utilizes to make stuff up with?
After completing all lectures, I was curious what professor had to say about dreams and imagination and brain activity.. maybe those videos are missing! I hope MIT uploads them soon
Maybe listening to music while reading interferes with our 'inner monologue' that we usually listen in our head when reading things. It could be that they are processed in similar ways/ the pathways overlap at some point? I certainly can study while listening to music, but only when the music is quiet enough so I can't easily distinguish the words, or pay too much attention to the melody.
why is our mental capacity limited? maybe some mental programmes to compute may be processed incorrectly as it is trying to be processed as a stimuli that has a similar electromagnetic/shape/charge/speed of charge
I would assume refinement of mental abilities would mean to sophisticatedly choose the right process to compute the specific stimuli based on its (trained/practiced ability) to select diffrences within similar or dissimilar stimuli and so the differences will be more accentuated with a finer or more refined sense to sense them.
What is social cognition. I think maybe I have it. I often dribble a football through the streets in my everyday life and I believe I use social cognition to guess or predict where people may walk or traverse through.
But sometimes, particularly if I think they can’t see me, I sometimes use my intuition. I look for ‘open space’. I think what I’m detecting is the engram or the determined path of motion of the other person in terms of thier decision to walk a particular path and/or I have an internal knowing of where the opening in space will be even if it’s not so right now. For example I can predict someone is going to the right my body will intuitively tell me to go to the left.without them perceiving me visually, I assume they make thier movement without my knowing (I have my headphones on but so may they)
I think perhaps neural networks are specific for specific points of vision I compute and mentally plot a cognitive interpretation for. That is to say if I look 20 yards ain vicinity all around me, I can notice differences and changes within that 3D 20 yard radius. If I only look at the ball, my attentional field of points plotted are only like 5 yards 3D radius (if that makes sense. Where I react more so on my reactions however I do get a sense before I perceive others, it may just be the action potential rising (the sense) and me noticing there’s something to sense (me perceiving the sensory information that I should pay attention)
Usually I have to ask my mind a specific question to get an answer for cognition. I.e, which direction should I go. Or I will breath in and if it’s constricted or tight (my diaphragm) it will not slow me to breath in fully, I will notice that slight tension. I interpret that as ‘that space will be occupied’ or a ‘yes’. Depending on what my question was.
Essentially the same right? Working memory? Hind brain BUT it’s all connected so past experiences & conditioning probably can affect the severity. I get lost in studying. I love research. Not healthy, though my skills have increased substantially over the last year AND with my increased cognitive functioning I’ve also lost weight! Lol okay okay it’s probably just a correlation of hyper focus and increase dopamine levels - Anyway look up - Dyschronometria
20 minutes in, plane pilots landing discussion. I think if they are expecting to see a runway hidden then they will emit an electromagnetic or perhaps just an electronic signal from their eyes that works as a lock and key type of methodology. in which things that fit the expected field of view are easier located because the electronic signal is a fine match for what it's looking for. otherwise they are going on their original thinking of going on the runway they see normally because that's the lock and key electronic signal they have emitted for. almost as if sight is more than just light. or perhaps it is, but maybe things that are relevant are in the realms of lock and key, matching what an electronic emission would code for when we process it then checking to see if it's a match of what we looking for. and if it is we go for that. idk just a thought. great talk really enjoying!
im referring tho the notion that the body emits an electro magnetic frequency from the sensory system it's using from it's perception. in this case the eyes. a perfect lock and key fit by perhaps the frequency or the shape of the electronic frequency would mean you are aware of in ur attention. and you see it. if it's not in ur attention it won't be a match. and so you won't see it. it won't be a match and see filtered out through the label of 'unuseful stimuli'
in terms of this being a limitation. is im sure a hidden landing site and a normal landing site they are used to has similar lock and keys. but a hidden one requires finer selection because it may be read as 'just the background and so not useful' because it also electronically speaking emits a lock and key (that you have primed ur brain for or rather because you haven't primed your brain for hidden landing sites) that is similar to the lock and key that the background would emit. and so again may be processed and labeled as 'just the backgournd'.
if they had been told before hand, i.e primed, i.e told to look out for hidden landing sites, they would have finer attunement in their attentional field of vision they are (I am hypothesising they are receiving or emitting an electronic current that acts as a lock and key for their attention to pick useful stimuli and acquire target or the goal which they have chosen as one of our stimuli to land on). their mind could differentiate finer lock and key methods to capture our overall attention by differentiateing the finer differences between the background and the hidden landing that will be hidden within the landscapre/background and normal landing site. im sure if we told them there were two landing sites they would scan the field quicker to look for more frequency and perhaps more detail incase the second landing site isn't obvious. the more frequency of landing sites we tell the pilots before the simulation probably the faster they will scan and try and balance that out with fineness of vision that is the ability to scan through the back ground for fine detail to see perhaps hidden landing sites within the background.
For example let’s say if the background was green. Any difference in green would be seen as maybe something useful. So maybe the brain selects green as unusfel stimuli. Opposite of green as useful stimuli. It’s the expression of that in electronic emission frequency… lock and key perfect fit or close enough match (would be anything that matches which would be the useful stimuli that isn’t green), would create some kind of reaction perhaps if it’s great enough, I,e if we sense enough of that difference with enough precision it will create action potential threshold reach and we will sense it, I.e it is aware, I.e we are consciously aware of it in our attentional field
Or perhaps instead of the colour coming in, we are looking for the difference in the way the surface of those colors behave. I.e perhaps the background is a green Forrest. But the landing site, is green aswell but also has a shiny metallic surface. Perhaps the way the surface of the material interacts with our field of vision if great enough or if our vision is fine enough,great enough, we can detect the small differences and become consciously aware of such
how much info is there, I would say as much as we allow ourselves to sense. I think infinite or close to infinite but perhaps what we can perceive the information we can perceive is limiting infinity to maybe a couple hundred billion but we are not consciously aware of because we are using other mental abilities such as hiking or feeling or simply running the same neurological circuits we habitually run based on our day to habits and habits in thinking and lifestylele and social climate etc.
Students: You’re in MIT speak up and have a dialogue. Why enroll in a quality course if you don’t participate. She’s a terrific educator attempting to engage you in active learning. 🤦🏻♀️ lol! Room is so quiet!! Jeez!
@@davyroger3773 Right? Exactly - public shaming 101 - always works. 😎 So what you’re really saying is my coping mechanism for dealing with built up animosity from the education system isn’t healthy? Fair. I can’t blame the students entirely but I’ll save that rant on environmental design, conditioning and curriculum structure for my journal. 😉
How many people have false beliefs about actual reality due to the inputs and processing going on with and in their brain? I'm thinking lots. Of which, how do 'I' even know for 100% certainty what is really true and what is not really true? Sometimes at least, actions follow beliefs. 'Faulty' beliefs could lead to 'faulty' actions.
Funny thing about absolute truth reality: It still is and always will be absolute truth reality. (Whether people know that truth or not and/or whether they believe that truth to be true or not). "The best way to deal with absolute truth reality is to deal with absolute truth reality. And if one is not dealing with absolute truth reality, then one is not dealing with absolute truth reality. Find and deal with absolute truth reality." (OSICA) Absolute truth is NOT a popularity contest. There were times in human history where only a single human being knew more of the real truth that was discovered than any other human in history. And note also: Denying future reality will not make future reality any less real. People just won't be prepared for it is all.
Consider the following: Language, the very thing we utilize to think thoughts and convey ideas. Un-named Concepts -> Given a Name (could be a sound, symbol, etc) -> With an attached meaning -> And maybe even other meanings depending upon context -> And maybe even other names with the same meaning. (Basically a Dictionary and a Thesaurus for a language). BUT: a. How exactly do we know for 100% certainty that we have all the un-named concepts that could ever be named? b. How exactly do we know for 100% certainty that the meanings we give named concepts are 100% correct? We truly do not know what we do not know. This is a part of the 'Great Unknown'. Never stop learning.
This is a philosophical question, and how can you even assert "truth reality still is and always will be"? We're not certain of that at all, it's all unknowable, see the brain in a jar hypothesis.
@@fuma9532 Do my gravity test and 'if' true, have the literal theory of everything for this universe: (copy and paste from my files): Here is the test for the 'gravity' portion of my TOE idea. I do not have the necessary resources to do the test but maybe you or someone else reading this does, will do the test, then tell the world what is found out either way. a. Imagine a 12 hour clock. b. Put a magnetic field across from the 3 to 9 o'clock positions. c. Put an electric field across from the 6 to 12 o'clock positions. (The magnetic field and electric field would be 90 degrees to each other and should be polarized so as to complement each other.) d. Direct a high powered laser through the center of the clock at 90 degrees to the em fields. e. Do this with the em fields on and off. (The em fields could be varied in size, strength, density and depth. The intent would be to energy frequency match the laser and em fields for optimal results, cancelling out the em modalities of the laser, thereby leaving behind the gravity modality.) f. Look for any gravitational / anti-gravitational effects. (Including the utilization of ferro cells so as to be able to actually see the energy field movements.) (And note: if done right, it's possible a mini gravitational black hole might form. Be ready for it. In addition, it's possible a neutrino might be formed before the black hole stage, the neutrino being a substance with a very high gravitational modality with very low 'em' modalities.) (An alternative to the above would be to direct 3 high powered lasers, or a single high powered laser split into 3 beams, each adjustable to achieve the above set up, all focused upon a single point in space.) 'If' effects are noted, 'then' further research could be done. 'If' effects are not noted, 'then' my latest TOE idea is wrong. But still, we would know what 'gravity' was not, which is still something in the scientific world. Science still wins either way and moves forward. * And note: Whether my gravity test or another's, a gravitational black hole would have to be formed to prove the concept as being really true. A gravitational black hole that 'if' self fed itself, could literally wipe out this Earth and all on it, possibly this solar system, possibly put a black hole in this section of our galaxy, and potentially even causing a ripple effect in this galaxy and surrounding universe. But hey, if it does, no worries. Nobody would be left to prosecute those who did so. (Possibly famous last words: "Hey, it worked. Ooooppppssss.................) But as NASA has already proven that low gravity conditions over a prolonged period of time is harmful to the human species, and large rotating space ships won't really work for space bases on planets and moons, those space bases probably being needed somewhere along the way out of this solar system and galaxy, we need to figure out what gravity truly is and see if we can generate artificial gravity so as to have smaller space ships and proper gravity conditions for space bases on planets and moons. Otherwise, at least all human life will most probably die and go extinct one day. Currently, no exceptions. ** Added note: Just trying to save at least 1 single species from this Earth to exist beyond this Earth so that life itself from this Earth has continued meaning and purpose to. Gives me something to do while I exist, otherwise, what is it all and everything for? Even if my TOE idea were correct, but if it did not help species survive beyond this Earth, what good would it ultimately be?
Common sense also says the Sun is orbiting around earth... Nothing wrong with experimenting to understand scientifically how much of our "common sense" is right, in which conditions, and why.
Details on the missing videos (see the course on MIT OpenCourseWare for more info, readings lectures notes, etc. at ocw.mit.edu/9-13S19 ): #3 did not have a lecture, it was an in-class dissection of a brain. #12 was a guest lecturer on brain-machine interface (we don't always get permission from guests to publish.) #14, 22 did not have a lectures, they were student breakout groups/discussions. #17 no notes given on why it was the video not recorded. The topic was MEG Decoding and RSA. #19 class canceled, video not recorded. #23 is still being edited (the lecture is being updated with 2021 material.) #25 was a recap of course and final review, video not recorded.
* NOTE: Lecture 22: Experimental Design (student breakout groups-video not recorded)
* NOTE: Lecture 23: Deep Networks (2021) (video will be added soon)
View the complete course: ocw.mit.edu/9-13S19
TH-cam Playlist: th-cam.com/play/PLUl4u3cNGP60IKRN_pFptIBxeiMc0MCJP.html
I want the paper
But did you notice Joe Biden’s hand the other day in that Fox News clip of his speech?
When can we expect the deep networks video? Thank you.
I love these fMRI data on awareness without perception. I didn't realize that could be so readily isolated (thanks to the ffa/ppa regions).
th-cam.com/video/s-pZZvcZnY8/w-d-xo.html
Ummm I made this viewable for y’all - it’s about my mind and brain dueling and taking away my consciousness from my externality and making it see inside “the dome” as a savant syndrome + anemia symptom - I was anemic when it happened and it hasn’t happened as strongly since - it took me from a well lit shower into a black dome.
I worked as a neuropsychiatry research assistant in the 80's and they weren't even scratching the surface of this stuff. I'm fascinated and she's a wonderful teacher.
Lies again? Allah Tuhan
This is nice, after watching most of Sapolsky's lectures this gives me something else to watch. Thanks for posting.
Me too, just finished sapolskys lecturers
I totally agree with your comment
lol yes this is exactly what i did
Thank You for this. Was looking for what to watch next.
Me too, and I'm wondering what I should watch next.
Me encanta con la pasión amor alegria que explica Dr Nancy Kanwisher quisiera que así explicaran en la Universidad las clases se hacen tan interesantes gracias por aportar a la sociedad con tanto conocimiento y profesionalismo un saludo y un gran abrazo desde Ecuador Dr es una magnánime eminencia 👍📖👏👏
Thanks for sharing this content for free guys
Well, I wish I had the notes in my hand. But this was very informative and very helpful. Prof Kanwisher is a lovely lady, she's brilliant at teaching. Big thank out to her and MIT for uploading this. Success to you and May God be with you. Cheers.
This is really a big help in teaching my students with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) & other health impairments 🙏🏽 Maraming Salamat po 🇵🇭🙏🏽✍️📓📚
Great course. The inclusion of cutting edge field results is greatly appreciated.
Hopefully there will be an updated version eventually.
Most Important it’s about public safety….
Not okay to talk on phone if it may cause danger to the public.
Okay to talk on phone if it does not cause danger to the public…
Yes to no, and yes to yes both exist within some space, where safety exist and space where danger to public safety exist.. depending on the space where actions occur..
Humans as social primates is always the context to view these topics. It's a MUST.
I watched this whole lecture series and it was very informative. Thank you to MIT for putting this out.
*whole 😮
Me: skipping topics, because of lazyness
@@sixteybit69 X2 is the secret...
Thanks for the open lectures! Excellent classes, difficult to follow without reading the right articles =), but I tried!
Thanks Professor Kanwisher!
Houses versus faces: Possibly it also has to do with what's changing. A face could change and interact with the observer, a house just basically is, unless something is going on with the house, then the attention might be on the house and not the face.
In other words, our focus might be where the action is. (Unless one wants to tune out the action and focus on just 'being').
Love your work, thanks for sharing, really appreciate all the contributions with educating us.
awareness here seems to be more or less the same as covert attention, except you can't always control it
still doesn't explain why you can actually subjectively feel whatever the brain is currently aware of
Tesla's ASD software does turn left. At first, it was very hesitant and timid but now it turns left with almost human alacrity.
General attention and focused attention: General attention, to what level? All levels simultaneously? The very nature of reality to everything that is being observed and interacted with, from specific energy interactions to the macro universal levels? Or focused attention, what am I really interested in at this specific time of my existence? But then also, what about the context of what I am focusing on? Context can change a focused attention.
27:10 always introduce oneself when talking to a professor 😄
Don’t suicide as it’s wrong. Contact a psychiatrist to know how and why suicide is wrong as they are trained to explain you well.
It's bc of the belief system. "You only see what you believe" as it were.
THANK YOU. LAST LECTURE. FINALLY
My coworker is able to work construction with his iPods on, I can’t even think .
Thank you
Wow glad I got accepted from a community college!
Why😂🤣
Did you see the competition in CC lately? Yikes! Poor educators!
@@Brandi.Nicole Don’t suicide as it’s wrong. Contact a psychiatrist to know how and why suicide is wrong as they are trained to explain you well.
@@futuristic426 Don’t suicide as it’s wrong. Contact a psychiatrist to know how and why suicide is wrong as they are trained to explain you well.
Individual awareness depends on their attention capability. The brain filters input relevant and irrelevant unique to each individual. This neural network is created through neural motor development which depends on how we experience our primary movements. Movement is necessary to build myelin sheath which is necessary to carry impulse.
Incredibly fascinating course with an excellent lecturer, thank you for sharing it!
What do you see? Perspective is important. While there are probable observations, so many more observations exist.
Thanks !
I’m concerned about the idea that attention in this context is all about sensory perceptive detection… I use the word attention to mean attending not neccessarily related to a sensory or specifically visual input… interesting…
Question: It is known that solar flares and incoming cosmic radiation can affect a person's brain. How exactly do such events affect a person's brain? (Positive and negative effects).
On what level are you asking?
Be specific.
Are you asking which mechanism is specifically affected?
Truth is we don’t have tons of studies but I would suggest reading reviews first with SEP exposure. I’m not an expert at all but it’s an easy search. From there, go directly to the original research that intrigues you (aka down the rabbit hole)
I also like reading about EMFs and the affects it has on the neurotransmitters / VGCC activation. (increase Intracellular calcium)
I’d say narrow the focus on the question maybe?
Decrease in White matter?
Activation of Amy?
Hormones?
Psychiatric disorders
Memory retention
Attention
Cognitive based research measuring intelligence
The list goes on lol
@@Brandi.Nicole All the above and more. Via QED whereby 'em' interacts with electrons in atoms and molecules and QCD whereby 'em' interacts with the nucleus of atoms, dependent primarily on the energy frequencies involved, and dependent upon what specific atoms and molecules were in and around the brain and body, would help dictate what exactly would occur. In addition, any stray electrons and stray protons could also affect the brain and body.
And then also, "IF" my TOE idea is correct, and the gravity test has to be accomplished to verify if that portion of the TOE idea is correct, but 'if' true, then 'em' and gravity are also interrelated as well as most probably the 'gem' photon being the energy unit of this universe that makes up everything in existence in this universe.
Often when I post the TOE idea and longer gravity test here on YT, it often gets blocked. But here is the really short version of the gravity test, (of which I do not currently have a high powered laser laying around doing nothing, much less 3, at least one of which would be required for the test so as to have enough energy to discern the gravitational black hole to prove the concept as being correct).
Gravity test: Very Short Version:
Counter-act the 'em' of a laser with 'em' and gravity will be left.
The question should be is it possible to be 100% attentive to your awareness?
Now, I know I do not know now…..which is perfect I know exactly what that suggest…. Which is 100 💯 percent which is “verb”.
This is your brain 'B', this is your brain in a box ['B']. It only has itself to deal with until sensory inputs come into it. (And sensory inputs are limited in actual reality). Plus, our brain likes to make stuff up to fill in the gaps of it's perceived reality. But also, where does the stuff come from that the brain utilizes to make stuff up with?
Maybe the total visual field is preprocessed and compiled/weighted before even leaving the eye.
After completing all lectures, I was curious what professor had to say about dreams and imagination and brain activity.. maybe those videos are missing! I hope MIT uploads them soon
very fascinating
Thanks ❤️🤍
Maybe listening to music while reading interferes with our 'inner monologue' that we usually listen in our head when reading things. It could be that they are processed in similar ways/ the pathways overlap at some point? I certainly can study while listening to music, but only when the music is quiet enough so I can't easily distinguish the words, or pay too much attention to the melody.
why is our mental capacity limited? maybe some mental programmes to compute may be processed incorrectly as it is trying to be processed as a stimuli that has a similar electromagnetic/shape/charge/speed of charge
I would assume refinement of mental abilities would mean to sophisticatedly choose the right process to compute the specific stimuli based on its (trained/practiced ability) to select diffrences within similar or dissimilar stimuli and so the differences will be more accentuated with a finer or more refined sense to sense them.
Can someone help me remember what lecture she talks about super face-recognizers?
What is social cognition. I think maybe I have it. I often dribble a football through the streets in my everyday life and I believe I use social cognition to guess or predict where people may walk or traverse through.
Before it would be reactionary, or the precedent would be set by a mutual acknowledgement of determined walking paths by me and the other person.
But sometimes, particularly if I think they can’t see me, I sometimes use my intuition. I look for ‘open space’. I think what I’m detecting is the engram or the determined path of motion of the other person in terms of thier decision to walk a particular path and/or I have an internal knowing of where the opening in space will be even if it’s not so right now. For example I can predict someone is going to the right my body will intuitively tell me to go to the left.without them perceiving me visually, I assume they make thier movement without my knowing (I have my headphones on but so may they)
I think perhaps neural networks are specific for specific points of vision I compute and mentally plot a cognitive interpretation for. That is to say if I look 20 yards ain vicinity all around me, I can notice differences and changes within that 3D 20 yard radius. If I only look at the ball, my attentional field of points plotted are only like 5 yards 3D radius (if that makes sense. Where I react more so on my reactions however I do get a sense before I perceive others, it may just be the action potential rising (the sense) and me noticing there’s something to sense (me perceiving the sensory information that I should pay attention)
Usually I have to ask my mind a specific question to get an answer for cognition. I.e, which direction should I go. Or I will breath in and if it’s constricted or tight (my diaphragm) it will not slow me to breath in fully, I will notice that slight tension. I interpret that as ‘that space will be occupied’ or a ‘yes’. Depending on what my question was.
It will not allow me to breathe in fully without some slight tension*
Social cognition is an interesting concept
This is helpful ❤️🤍
Hi I'm hoping you'll do a speach on the brain and time lapse.. I'm bad with time
Essentially the same right? Working memory?
Hind brain BUT it’s all connected so past experiences & conditioning probably can affect the severity.
I get lost in studying. I love research. Not healthy, though my skills have increased substantially over the last year AND with my increased cognitive functioning I’ve also lost weight!
Lol okay okay it’s probably just a correlation of hyper focus and increase dopamine levels -
Anyway look up - Dyschronometria
20 minutes in, plane pilots landing discussion. I think if they are expecting to see a runway hidden then they will emit an electromagnetic or perhaps just an electronic signal from their eyes that works as a lock and key type of methodology. in which things that fit the expected field of view are easier located because the electronic signal is a fine match for what it's looking for. otherwise they are going on their original thinking of going on the runway they see normally because that's the lock and key electronic signal they have emitted for. almost as if sight is more than just light. or perhaps it is, but maybe things that are relevant are in the realms of lock and key, matching what an electronic emission would code for when we process it then checking to see if it's a match of what we looking for. and if it is we go for that. idk just a thought. great talk really enjoying!
im referring tho the notion that the body emits an electro magnetic frequency from the sensory system it's using from it's perception. in this case the eyes. a perfect lock and key fit by perhaps the frequency or the shape of the electronic frequency would mean you are aware of in ur attention. and you see it. if it's not in ur attention it won't be a match. and so you won't see it. it won't be a match and see filtered out through the label of 'unuseful stimuli'
in terms of this being a limitation. is im sure a hidden landing site and a normal landing site they are used to has similar lock and keys. but a hidden one requires finer selection because it may be read as 'just the background and so not useful' because it also electronically speaking emits a lock and key (that you have primed ur brain for or rather because you haven't primed your brain for hidden landing sites) that is similar to the lock and key that the background would emit. and so again may be processed and labeled as 'just the backgournd'.
if they had been told before hand, i.e primed, i.e told to look out for hidden landing sites, they would have finer attunement in their attentional field of vision they are (I am hypothesising they are receiving or emitting an electronic current that acts as a lock and key for their attention to pick useful stimuli and acquire target or the goal which they have chosen as one of our stimuli to land on). their mind could differentiate finer lock and key methods to capture our overall attention by differentiateing the finer differences between the background and the hidden landing that will be hidden within the landscapre/background and normal landing site. im sure if we told them there were two landing sites they would scan the field quicker to look for more frequency and perhaps more detail incase the second landing site isn't obvious. the more frequency of landing sites we tell the pilots before the simulation probably the faster they will scan and try and balance that out with fineness of vision that is the ability to scan through the back ground for fine detail to see perhaps hidden landing sites within the background.
For example let’s say if the background was green. Any difference in green would be seen as maybe something useful. So maybe the brain selects green as unusfel stimuli. Opposite of green as useful stimuli. It’s the expression of that in electronic emission frequency… lock and key perfect fit or close enough match (would be anything that matches which would be the useful stimuli that isn’t green), would create some kind of reaction perhaps if it’s great enough, I,e if we sense enough of that difference with enough precision it will create action potential threshold reach and we will sense it, I.e it is aware, I.e we are consciously aware of it in our attentional field
Or perhaps instead of the colour coming in, we are looking for the difference in the way the surface of those colors behave. I.e perhaps the background is a green Forrest. But the landing site, is green aswell but also has a shiny metallic surface. Perhaps the way the surface of the material interacts with our field of vision if great enough or if our vision is fine enough,great enough, we can detect the small differences and become consciously aware of such
Why you look views on her first video it have 1.2M. so it's actually a loophole in open classes and moocs that peoples actually didn't Finnish courses
what's the take home message, no music while reading?
That eye tracker thing would be a nightmare for people who like looking at boobs
The comments section here is a lesson on attention - what the heck are you talking about.? Talking and driving > watching and reading
我终于学完了，太不容易了
how much info is there, I would say as much as we allow ourselves to sense. I think infinite or close to infinite but perhaps what we can perceive the information we can perceive is limiting infinity to maybe a couple hundred billion but we are not consciously aware of because we are using other mental abilities such as hiking or feeling or simply running the same neurological circuits we habitually run based on our day to habits and habits in thinking and lifestylele and social climate etc.
such as thinking* sorry not hiking :')
Students: You’re in MIT speak up and have a dialogue. Why enroll in a quality course if you don’t participate. She’s a terrific educator attempting to engage you in active learning. 🤦🏻♀️ lol! Room is so quiet!! Jeez!
I'm sure they'll see this and get their act together, nothing like a little virtual chastisement to spur one on to activity
@@davyroger3773 Right? Exactly - public shaming 101 - always works. 😎 So what you’re really saying is my coping mechanism for dealing with built up animosity from the education system isn’t healthy? Fair.
I can’t blame the students entirely but I’ll save that rant on environmental design, conditioning and curriculum structure for my journal. 😉
@@davyroger3773 I cannot tell if this is brilliant satire or incredible optimism
+ I agree as well. These students are dry sometimes Haha.
How many people have false beliefs about actual reality due to the inputs and processing going on with and in their brain? I'm thinking lots. Of which, how do 'I' even know for 100% certainty what is really true and what is not really true? Sometimes at least, actions follow beliefs. 'Faulty' beliefs could lead to 'faulty' actions.
Funny thing about absolute truth reality: It still is and always will be absolute truth reality. (Whether people know that truth or not and/or whether they believe that truth to be true or not).
"The best way to deal with absolute truth reality is to deal with absolute truth reality. And if one is not dealing with absolute truth reality, then one is not dealing with absolute truth reality. Find and deal with absolute truth reality." (OSICA)
Absolute truth is NOT a popularity contest. There were times in human history where only a single human being knew more of the real truth that was discovered than any other human in history.
And note also: Denying future reality will not make future reality any less real. People just won't be prepared for it is all.
Consider the following: Language, the very thing we utilize to think thoughts and convey ideas.
Un-named Concepts -> Given a Name (could be a sound, symbol, etc) -> With an attached meaning -> And maybe even other meanings depending upon context -> And maybe even other names with the same meaning.
(Basically a Dictionary and a Thesaurus for a language).
BUT:
a. How exactly do we know for 100% certainty that we have all the un-named concepts that could ever be named?
b. How exactly do we know for 100% certainty that the meanings we give named concepts are 100% correct?
We truly do not know what we do not know.
This is a part of the 'Great Unknown'. Never stop learning.
This is a philosophical question, and how can you even assert "truth reality still is and always will be"? We're not certain of that at all, it's all unknowable, see the brain in a jar hypothesis.
@@fuma9532 a. Absolute truth does not actually exist: That in itself would be absolute truth.
b. Absolute truth truly exists. Okay, sure.
@@fuma9532 Do my gravity test and 'if' true, have the literal theory of everything for this universe: (copy and paste from my files):
Here is the test for the 'gravity' portion of my TOE idea. I do not have the necessary resources to do the test but maybe you or someone else reading this does, will do the test, then tell the world what is found out either way.
a. Imagine a 12 hour clock.
b. Put a magnetic field across from the 3 to 9 o'clock positions.
c. Put an electric field across from the 6 to 12 o'clock positions.
(The magnetic field and electric field would be 90 degrees to each other and should be polarized so as to complement each other.)
d. Direct a high powered laser through the center of the clock at 90 degrees to the em fields.
e. Do this with the em fields on and off.
(The em fields could be varied in size, strength, density and depth. The intent would be to energy frequency match the laser and em fields for optimal results, cancelling out the em modalities of the laser, thereby leaving behind the gravity modality.)
f. Look for any gravitational / anti-gravitational effects.
(Including the utilization of ferro cells so as to be able to actually see the energy field movements.)
(And note: if done right, it's possible a mini gravitational black hole might form. Be ready for it. In addition, it's possible a neutrino might be formed before the black hole stage, the neutrino being a substance with a very high gravitational modality with very low 'em' modalities.)
(An alternative to the above would be to direct 3 high powered lasers, or a single high powered laser split into 3 beams, each adjustable to achieve the above set up, all focused upon a single point in space.)
'If' effects are noted, 'then' further research could be done.
'If' effects are not noted, 'then' my latest TOE idea is wrong. But still, we would know what 'gravity' was not, which is still something in the scientific world. Science still wins either way and moves forward.
* And note: Whether my gravity test or another's, a gravitational black hole would have to be formed to prove the concept as being really true. A gravitational black hole that 'if' self fed itself, could literally wipe out this Earth and all on it, possibly this solar system, possibly put a black hole in this section of our galaxy, and potentially even causing a ripple effect in this galaxy and surrounding universe. But hey, if it does, no worries. Nobody would be left to prosecute those who did so. (Possibly famous last words: "Hey, it worked. Ooooppppssss.................)
But as NASA has already proven that low gravity conditions over a prolonged period of time is harmful to the human species, and large rotating space ships won't really work for space bases on planets and moons, those space bases probably being needed somewhere along the way out of this solar system and galaxy, we need to figure out what gravity truly is and see if we can generate artificial gravity so as to have smaller space ships and proper gravity conditions for space bases on planets and moons. Otherwise, at least all human life will most probably die and go extinct one day. Currently, no exceptions.
** Added note: Just trying to save at least 1 single species from this Earth to exist beyond this Earth so that life itself from this Earth has continued meaning and purpose to. Gives me something to do while I exist, otherwise, what is it all and everything for? Even if my TOE idea were correct, but if it did not help species survive beyond this Earth, what good would it ultimately be?
I got a lot of attention but I can't drive.
26:27
🕊🌎🕊🕊
Seriously these people are in college and this should be common sence
Getting a more rigorous grip into stuff that appear 'just common sense' is often the point of many things in college
Common sense also says the Sun is orbiting around earth... Nothing wrong with experimenting to understand scientifically how much of our "common sense" is right, in which conditions, and why.
it fucking sucks how much we can talk about anything
Don’t suicide as it’s wrong. Contact a psychiatrist to know how and why suicide is wrong as they are trained to explain you well.
😍😍😍
I want a watch 22, 23 and 19 video. but can't find. Sadge🥲 could you upload it later?
Details on the missing videos (see the course on MIT OpenCourseWare for more info, readings lectures notes, etc. at ocw.mit.edu/9-13S19 ):
#3 did not have a lecture, it was an in-class dissection of a brain.
#12 was a guest lecturer on brain-machine interface (we don't always get permission from guests to publish.)
#14, 22 did not have a lectures, they were student breakout groups/discussions.
#17 no notes given on why it was the video not recorded. The topic was MEG Decoding and RSA.
#19 class canceled, video not recorded.
#23 is still being edited (the lecture is being updated with 2021 material.)
#25 was a recap of course and final review, video not recorded.
@@mitocw Thanks for comment. can't wait 2021 material lecture. it sounds super cool.
Thank you