Made a list of pertinent info for me, hope it has some value for someone else: - Having a face on the website increases initial trust significantly - Short-form videos demoing your product help guide a new customer through your funnel - Walls of text on intro pages can come off as more overwhelming than educating - Your website should flow with a customers initial questions. Consider how they would interact and navigate the site as they determine whether your product is for them or not
-What is it? -Who is this for? -How are you adding value? (How will this get my property to sell faster or increase revenue?) -Simplify design 7:37 8:43 *13:50 -Avoid big blocks of text 16:20
Remember to test any changes, and to keep track of the A/B/cohort through to retention. For example, with the AI presenter website, a smaller video might hide the lip-synch issues and lead to more sign-ups, but once in, they might churn sooner. However, the larger more accurate representation of the final product might attract stickier customers. No way to know without experimentation and tracking. Often the intuitive good ideas have unintuitive negative consequences. As I write this, I realise this might be why they saw two versions of the same page, a bug in the A/B testing :) Finallly, remember that two people looking at a website is nothing like a person alone. When you're alone, you can focus and read details. When you're with someone else you don't stop to read anything, esp. if you don't know the other person. Being silent with someone is very intimate and takes self confidence. So they should really be coming up with feedback individually, the way they would actually consume the content, and avoiding groupthink and awkwardness of disagreeing with someone you only just met.
For Colossyan, what they could do to drive conversions is instead of a video ad on their hero section, they can upload a demo video on how the product works. This will give prospects a far batter understanding of their value proposition
Don't paint existing solutions in bad light. In the context of no-code tools: "Sometimes there's some tension to navigate - you don't want to paint developers in negative light, you can say now they can have more time to do other things, and that you can freely edit the product without bothering them" "sometimes it sounds really great, but I'm most skeptical about how it will work, so I want to watch a video" social proof: "it looks like they got la lot of press here, which makes me want to take it more seriously" "interactive demo was better than just reading paragraphs"
Who should be the special guest on the next episode of Design Review?
Brian Chesky
Jony Ive
James Mikrut (Payload CMS)
Someone from Figma, Nuxt or Tailwind Team
Justin Kan, Kevin Hart, Barack Obama, Joe Gebbia, or Steve Jobs
Made a list of pertinent info for me, hope it has some value for someone else:
- Having a face on the website increases initial trust significantly
- Short-form videos demoing your product help guide a new customer through your funnel
- Walls of text on intro pages can come off as more overwhelming than educating
- Your website should flow with a customers initial questions. Consider how they would interact and navigate the site as they determine whether your product is for them or not
🧠
Flycode designer here ;) thanks for the kind words! Really appreciated😊
nice changes!
how big is the design team
@@stackingflow Just me, myslef and I
-What is it?
-Who is this for?
-How are you adding value? (How will this get my property to sell faster or increase revenue?)
-Simplify design
7:37
8:43
*13:50
-Avoid big blocks of text
16:20
Great vid, I'd love to see this series focus on mobile landing pages
Having a guest CEO of Webflow and talking 90% of the time by yourself instead 🤔
So smart 😉
Remember to test any changes, and to keep track of the A/B/cohort through to retention. For example, with the AI presenter website, a smaller video might hide the lip-synch issues and lead to more sign-ups, but once in, they might churn sooner. However, the larger more accurate representation of the final product might attract stickier customers.
No way to know without experimentation and tracking. Often the intuitive good ideas have unintuitive negative consequences. As I write this, I realise this might be why they saw two versions of the same page, a bug in the A/B testing :)
Finallly, remember that two people looking at a website is nothing like a person alone. When you're alone, you can focus and read details. When you're with someone else you don't stop to read anything, esp. if you don't know the other person. Being silent with someone is very intimate and takes self confidence.
So they should really be coming up with feedback individually, the way they would actually consume the content, and avoiding groupthink and awkwardness of disagreeing with someone you only just met.
For Colossyan, what they could do to drive conversions is instead of a video ad on their hero section, they can upload a demo video on how the product works. This will give prospects a far batter understanding of their value proposition
Chapters (Powered by ChapterMe) -
00:00 - Design Review
00:59 - First website - Oda Studio
06:25 - Flycode
12:00 - Colossyan
17:30 - Artifact
23:21 - Outro
Was this purely AI generated, or does it need a bit of human touch? :)
@@wemote ChapterMe uses AI for generating chapters and no human touch is required.
Thank you Aaron and Vlad for this series. I will be happy to see the review of the mobile version of the website
wow. the first website is legitimately breaking advertisement law in real estate.
Don't paint existing solutions in bad light. In the context of no-code tools: "Sometimes there's some tension to navigate - you don't want to paint developers in negative light, you can say now they can have more time to do other things, and that you can freely edit the product without bothering them"
"sometimes it sounds really great, but I'm most skeptical about how it will work, so I want to watch a video"
social proof: "it looks like they got la lot of press here, which makes me want to take it more seriously"
"interactive demo was better than just reading paragraphs"
I’m curious to know the page dimensions, great content by the way!
Love this format, seeing your thought process as you go
This is a great series. Can't wait for the next video!
When Vlad said, "Interesting", it sounded like "oh, it's disgusting" lmao
Webflow is the best!
Thank you.
A new website builder is coming soon in the market and will make webflow completely obsolete.
Can you review our new website? I’d love to hear what you have to say. We are launching it next week.
More content like this 🎈
❤️
This guy from YC is rude
Web-Flow Bugs free issue