Around 27:30 you could've used Swords to Plowshares on that Zombie to stop it from blocking Golos. 3 combat damage > 2 lifegain. They would've died instead of going to 1 life.
I think a must run for Golos in this format is Ephemerate, protects Golos if they go to remove it, which they'll want to do. Worst case scenario is you hit it with Golos' ability you ramp out two more lands where as other protections for Golos like Heroic Intervention or Snakeskin Veil are basically dead if Golos hits them.
You actually want them to eliminate Golos because it's huge card disadvantage for your opponent, you straight up don't care if you go T4 Golos -> Fetch Field of the Dead and then they kill it because you can trot Golos out the turn after as long as you have just one land in hand. Some commanders generate value when they come into play, some commanders generate value by forcing your opponent to kill it. Golos does both.
since i don’t see enough people mention this…i figured i should let you know your thumbnails kill me every time…literally saw a notification at work and the thumbnail pic made me bust out laughing 😂 😂
People have been asking for historic brawl queues for a long time. Took them long enough to even add in standard brawl queues. Will take even longer for historic
Can confirm: golos is an insanely strong commander. I have a edh deck with him as the commander and not only is it fun to pilot it's also super consistent. That moment where you brainstorm and put your most powerful two spells on top before activating golos 👌👌👌
Ive been running golos as a god-tribal super ramp world tree deck. Rarely doesnt get to 11 mana. I run a lot more removal to protect myself while i try to combo off. Ive only had my world tree blown up one time in the many games ive played with it. Unfortunately people usually scoop as soon as you activate it...
I reinstalled the game to try this deck, it cost me 0 wildcard and had a fun night with it. Ty for the video. Not gonna lie, I try to refrain myself for buying anything from this company, but at the same time I love magic, so sad this game as such a horrible monetization in all of its forms.
I really don't like this type of deck on brawl. It's sad to see some people trying to have fun with different commanders just to get crushed by this type of tryhard deck. It's not a personal attack on cgb though, just venting my frustration.
The matchmaking for this event supposedly tries to pair commanders of comparable power. So CGB's Golos here played with other banned commanders: mirror Golos, Winota, Omnath, and not sure about Bolas. If you try to have fun with underpowered commanders, ideally you should also get underpowered opponents.
There are two tiers of commanders. CGB likes to play the broken, try-hard commanders, so he's only paired against other stupid, broken commanders. The format is much better if you stay away from these commanders. You'll get paired against people playing similar decks.
@@DRACONAR1US you choose what cards you put in the deck, instead of agent, ultimatums etc. you could play other value pieces if you find the others unfun.
I hate the format. It’s always some variant of 5 color goodstuff headed by either Golos or Prismatic Bridge. Sometimes, you’ll run into 5 color slivers, but it’s the same deck with all of the available slivers. On the other end of the spectrum are every single 2 mana commander that are just straight up engine cards that don’t need any secondary card interactions to function, when before cards like that were 4 and 5 mana. Imo, Golos and Baral need to be banned until they can add 4 player Brawl because those two in particular are super powerful when there is only one person with the chance to have an answer for them. Another alternative to banning Golos in particular is adding cards to hate on the activated ability, like torpor orb or Collector Ouphe. Prismatic Bridge can be dealt with by means of Grafdiggers Cage or Weathered Runestone.
you should try riff capashen commander. a flash commander that holds counters spells and gets to play sagas, artifacts and artifacts spells in instant speed.. flash ECD? hell yeah :3
I don't know if it's just cause I'm from California, but I can't watch CGB without speeding up the video to 150%. for some reason both the Arena client and the speed he speaks at just seem slower than normal to me.
@@dif4797 not really. There are plenty of activations that can be stoped via target removal, or bad choices. Golos doesn't work on that axis, it doesn't even target the table, but the player's library, and rewards having the most powerfull cards possible. Thats an obnoxious design, because not only he has that ability, but also helps to pay it with his etb. He is a great example of a bad design.
@@ShredPenguins if the only way to play against him in a 4FFA type of game, is ganging on him 3vs1, he is badly designed. Just like Tergrid (wich i have, i've build her, she is obnoxious, now she is only in the 99). Playing politics as a result of the state of the table is nice. Playing politics from turn zero because of the brutal imbalance in the power of the generals should tell you something about how banworthy he is.
@@ShredPenguins koma relies on combat and board presence. You only need to respond it once for it to get under control. Golos is extremely uninteractive, with the added bonus of paying his own tax. The momentum gained by a Koma player by untapping with his general, compared to a Golos player untapping with him is WAY less scary.
i cant believe how many people arent running craterhoof behemoth in golos. cant tell you how many games ive won with it. certainly better than eerie ultimatum, thats for damn sure.
i do understand that golos is banned in commander. putting dark depths and thespian stage on the play with it is quite rough. for brawl you have many strong options. golos is very good there, but that game breaking. maybe it could be.. trying to copy your field of the dead or something. not seen yet specific golos strategy for brawl that would be game breaking.
33:09 you re playing with an italian. unciuchino is translated with = one donkey Ciuchino isn t official italian word but adjective. it s like to call donkey but with a cute name/nick XD
Hey CGB was wondering if there is anyway to have a deck doctor or a deck reviewed without being a subscription payer, I wouldn’t mind putting forth some money when I get it I just don’t have the money for a subscription, I know your busy so I understand if this isn’t replied to or you don’t have the time but thank you either way, love the content and have a great day
No. Just no. Golos was banned in Brawl. So was Winota and Omn4th. I'm sure the games are insane and CGB did some great plays, but I won't run nor play against those commanders in this format. I do hope we can keep a 100 card 'historic brawl', but the developers need to remember why some commanders are banned in a 1v1 format where the power/value level is too hard to overcome.
As a Golos player, your list saddens me. You play too many early cards that doesnt actually progress your game. Your list over-focuses on dealing with your opponent's things instead. Plus, when you reveal off Golos, some cards just aren't that good to cast. Plus, when you do go off, who cares what your opponent is playing?? Too much overwheming advantage ends the game quickly. But, if it works for you, cool. Golos decks just never care about what your opponent has or does.
![[LIVE] : ONE ลุมพินี 84 วันนี้!! คู่เอก "ก้องศึก vs เมืองไทย"](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/3kuzsAIDf1c/mqdefault.jpg)
I really wish they’d make 100 card historic brawl and standard brawl a permanent mode.
I wish it could be ranked as well
Same but they should ban the dumb crap like golos
That would be 2 player commander. Which WOC hates because they weren't creative enough to come up with it themselves...
Even with only 60 cards they should make historic brawl a regular thing
Standard Brawl is a regular queue now. Historic is not (60 or 100)
Around 27:30 you could've used Swords to Plowshares on that Zombie to stop it from blocking Golos. 3 combat damage > 2 lifegain. They would've died instead of going to 1 life.
Came here to say exactly that
Saw this as well but he didn't lose because of it so 🤷
@@maximus574 Results should not dictate if the play was good or not. It was a bad play, no matter the result.
Guys, oh guys..."He knows how his cards (and math) work"
I think a must run for Golos in this format is Ephemerate, protects Golos if they go to remove it, which they'll want to do. Worst case scenario is you hit it with Golos' ability you ramp out two more lands where as other protections for Golos like Heroic Intervention or Snakeskin Veil are basically dead if Golos hits them.
You actually want them to eliminate Golos because it's huge card disadvantage for your opponent, you straight up don't care if you go T4 Golos -> Fetch Field of the Dead and then they kill it because you can trot Golos out the turn after as long as you have just one land in hand. Some commanders generate value when they come into play, some commanders generate value by forcing your opponent to kill it. Golos does both.
Imprison in the moon, damping sphere, null rod, etc... All take care of the golos problem and are harder to remove than a creature.
Yeah that’s true
I say omniscience because it’s fun.
Omg I love this format!!! That game against Omnath was epicly insane! Holy moly. Letsgooo
since i don’t see enough people mention this…i figured i should let you know your thumbnails kill me every time…literally saw a notification at work and the thumbnail pic made me bust out laughing 😂 😂
It's getting to the point where I look forward to the thumbnails almost as much as the video itself
43:52 cgb says shut up to himself, thats the content I am here for
If wizards doesn’t make this a permanent format... I’ll be extremely upset.
Oh boi
People have been asking for historic brawl queues for a long time. Took them long enough to even add in standard brawl queues. Will take even longer for historic
“Oh no...oh no...you’re not going to watch that resolve are ya?”
What a brawl!!! That last bout was one for the the ages!
@49:33 Love to cast Emergent Ultimatum just to get three busted blue cards
i run golos just to fetch the world tree, to then sac it and smash the oponent with all gods available on arena...and it is amazing
Did this too. Nobody needs Field of the Dead, when you have Purphoros and Rhonas XD
@@heinzmuller7712 to be fair, i got field of the dead in there as well..since golos tends to die if i got no counter spell or protection ready
i would have loved to see a koma in the top end, but regardless im looking forward to seeing the big golos plays.
The *never finish a game deck*
Well damn, you did actually finish the last game. GGs
This deck seems to be missing 32 gods for world tree
Could you make an Ulamog commander? Or are you not allowed to use completely colorless commanders
colourless commanders are allowed but aren't often great as you deny yourself access to the majority of cards
I would make little Ugin the commander instead.
Can confirm: golos is an insanely strong commander. I have a edh deck with him as the commander and not only is it fun to pilot it's also super consistent. That moment where you brainstorm and put your most powerful two spells on top before activating golos 👌👌👌
Ive been running golos as a god-tribal super ramp world tree deck. Rarely doesnt get to 11 mana. I run a lot more removal to protect myself while i try to combo off. Ive only had my world tree blown up one time in the many games ive played with it. Unfortunately people usually scoop as soon as you activate it...
That thumbnail is beautiful
For some one ragging on The World tree, he sure does Fetch it a lot. The World Tree is awesome Period!
I reinstalled the game to try this deck, it cost me 0 wildcard and had a fun night with it. Ty for the video. Not gonna lie, I try to refrain myself for buying anything from this company, but at the same time I love magic, so sad this game as such a horrible monetization in all of its forms.
I totally understand. I tend to play with one of the free programs around, but of course there are far fewer opponents on those.
Love Golos in CEDH too
I really don't like this type of deck on brawl. It's sad to see some people trying to have fun with different commanders just to get crushed by this type of tryhard deck. It's not a personal attack on cgb though, just venting my frustration.
i dont really get what you mean by tryhard? golos can be played pretty chill depending on what you put inthe deck
It really can't
The matchmaking for this event supposedly tries to pair commanders of comparable power. So CGB's Golos here played with other banned commanders: mirror Golos, Winota, Omnath, and not sure about Bolas. If you try to have fun with underpowered commanders, ideally you should also get underpowered opponents.
There are two tiers of commanders. CGB likes to play the broken, try-hard commanders, so he's only paired against other stupid, broken commanders. The format is much better if you stay away from these commanders. You'll get paired against people playing similar decks.
@@DRACONAR1US you choose what cards you put in the deck, instead of agent, ultimatums etc. you could play other value pieces if you find the others unfun.
Golos says "Tireless". Super accurated
I started playing 3 mana ashiok commander just because of golos. Watching them playing golos and don't fetch, and then shame scooping is...satisfying
I'd love a perm historic brawl format on arena
What about borjuka bog in the mana base?
Hard agree with that 👌
Is that card even in MTG Arena?
@@AlexFarleyMusicyes t'is
love this format, plus im cool today :)
That last game was sick.
Keep the brawl content coming CGB! It's fantastic 👏
Hey CGB I love watching your vids, can you do a deck building tips video? That would be awesome.
All you need is Golos. Yep.
Thespian's Stage might be a good card - copy Field to make 2X the zombies. I might build this in paper.
Last match was awesome
Ah yes, traditional 5-Color-Good-Stuff at its finest
38:48
With the pw you don't have to worry about counterspells on creatures.
I hate the format. It’s always some variant of 5 color goodstuff headed by either Golos or Prismatic Bridge. Sometimes, you’ll run into 5 color slivers, but it’s the same deck with all of the available slivers. On the other end of the spectrum are every single 2 mana commander that are just straight up engine cards that don’t need any secondary card interactions to function, when before cards like that were 4 and 5 mana. Imo, Golos and Baral need to be banned until they can add 4 player Brawl because those two in particular are super powerful when there is only one person with the chance to have an answer for them. Another alternative to banning Golos in particular is adding cards to hate on the activated ability, like torpor orb or Collector Ouphe. Prismatic Bridge can be dealt with by means of Grafdiggers Cage or Weathered Runestone.
What would this deck cost tabletop?
you should try riff capashen commander. a flash commander that holds counters spells and gets to play sagas, artifacts and artifacts spells in instant speed.. flash ECD? hell yeah :3
I LOVE THIS DECK
Keep your good content cgb!! And have a nice day
Ive also seen people run a super friends golos. Kinda odd to me lol but its usually difficult to interact with
can't find the decklist !!!
someone help??
I don't know if it's just cause I'm from California, but I can't watch CGB without speeding up the video to 150%. for some reason both the Arena client and the speed he speaks at just seem slower than normal to me.
hmm..
i love the new vids of brawl/commander
CGB: "And now we get to the real broken stuff."
Time Warp and Omnath aren't broken enough for you?!?
So excited for this one!
One other strategy can kill Golos... few dare to try Isamaru, Hound of Konda, and his white weenie horde!!!
4 player brawl would be so nice to have
golos needs to get banned, not just in brawl, but commander in general. His activation is really hard to stop or overcome once it resolves
Every activation is hard to stop when activated
@@dif4797 not really. There are plenty of activations that can be stoped via target removal, or bad choices. Golos doesn't work on that axis, it doesn't even target the table, but the player's library, and rewards having the most powerfull cards possible. Thats an obnoxious design, because not only he has that ability, but also helps to pay it with his etb. He is a great example of a bad design.
@@ShredPenguins if the only way to play against him in a 4FFA type of game, is ganging on him 3vs1, he is badly designed. Just like Tergrid (wich i have, i've build her, she is obnoxious, now she is only in the 99). Playing politics as a result of the state of the table is nice. Playing politics from turn zero because of the brutal imbalance in the power of the generals should tell you something about how banworthy he is.
@@ShredPenguins koma relies on combat and board presence. You only need to respond it once for it to get under control. Golos is extremely uninteractive, with the added bonus of paying his own tax. The momentum gained by a Koma player by untapping with his general, compared to a Golos player untapping with him is WAY less scary.
i cant believe how many people arent running craterhoof behemoth in golos. cant tell you how many games ive won with it. certainly better than eerie ultimatum, thats for damn sure.
32:09 If you tapped your lands for2 of all the colors first, it should have left one of each for the activation
last game is so clutch
world tree is so good for Golos bolos
Still no video of the powerhouse combo decks in the format? Running out of time to showcase how nuts Jodah and Sisay are here.
i do understand that golos is banned in commander. putting dark depths and thespian stage on the play with it is quite rough. for brawl you have many strong options. golos is very good there, but that game breaking. maybe it could be.. trying to copy your field of the dead or something. not seen yet specific golos strategy for brawl that would be game breaking.
You missed the best way to get around Golos ... Control effects
33:09 you re playing with an italian.
unciuchino is translated with = one donkey
Ciuchino isn t official italian word but adjective. it s like to call donkey but with a cute name/nick XD
Something about cgb missing lethal
Let's GOOOOOOLOS!
Hey CGB was wondering if there is anyway to have a deck doctor or a deck reviewed without being a subscription payer, I wouldn’t mind putting forth some money when I get it I just don’t have the money for a subscription, I know your busy so I understand if this isn’t replied to or you don’t have the time but thank you either way, love the content and have a great day
You only need to ramp, if you want to play the long game
That's my card commander, hes litty
Watched to the end
Zacama deck when?
I didn't the first 5 or 6 times but fighting big G gets old. Same for Esaka and Kinan.
Golos is cool but most opponent will forfeit before you can even play it 😅
Agent couldn't be countered at around 38:50.
CKC! Golos!!
You have to order it the right way CGB 😂 it's 🟡🔵⚫🔴🟢 ☝️
CGB could you build a commander deck that isn’t super OP and over the top? That would be cool
Чей голос-то?
I was triggered when you said excetera. I thought you were a smart guy CGB...
7!
god i hate playing against 5c brawl decks
Should have omniscience.
Disgusting. I love it.
Yo
Algorithm comment
No. Just no. Golos was banned in Brawl. So was Winota and Omn4th. I'm sure the games are insane and CGB did some great plays, but I won't run nor play against those commanders in this format. I do hope we can keep a 100 card 'historic brawl', but the developers need to remember why some commanders are banned in a 1v1 format where the power/value level is too hard to overcome.
@Todd Packer It wouldn't be so bad in a 4-person queue, and if they weren't so hellbent on crafting a 'historic/remastered' card selection.
@Todd Packer If it were commander we'd have more cards for more answers and more players to dilute the value engines
They need to ban him. Getting real dang tired of seeing him.
Everyone is playing this deck it’s kinda sad, I was hoping to see more diversity and expression, arena players 🤣
Weird, i’ve been spamming this format and I’ve encountered this deck 2 -3 times tops.
As a Golos player, your list saddens me. You play too many early cards that doesnt actually progress your game. Your list over-focuses on dealing with your opponent's things instead. Plus, when you reveal off Golos, some cards just aren't that good to cast. Plus, when you do go off, who cares what your opponent is playing?? Too much overwheming advantage ends the game quickly. But, if it works for you, cool. Golos decks just never care about what your opponent has or does.