Looks like the number 3 engine's thrust reverser was locked out. Notice it does not deploy, and the pilot keeps right rudder throughout the reverse thrust. Great landing on two rev thrusters!
It is probably just deferred for some kind of maintenance reason. This is actually fairly common to have one deferred. It really is not a big deal as long as it is accounted for in the landing performance calculation for the airport. Once deferred they can be inoperative for however long as specified in the minimum equipment list. Keeping the rudder and aileron crosswind correction in during the landing rollout is proper technique. As the airspeed slows, and the flight controls lose their effectiveness, and the wing stops producing lift, weight is transferred to the landing gear, and the X-wind correction is no longer needed. Around approximately 80 knots or so, you would then transfer to all nose-wheel steering control and wind correction is no longer needed.
@@Kakiharaichii The cowling on the left engine (1) and the Vertical stabilizer engine open upon touchdown and you hear them spool up to reverse. The pilot is on right rudder to counteract the effect the reverse on 1 is having on the yaw caused by the starboard engine not participating.
Wow that is some fine video you shot there.. I'm up the road about 70miles from KMHT and (sim) fly through there frequently.. was there this morning with a Pierre Robinson 401.. You do some FIRST CLASS work there! Thanks for an enjoyable experience! Your efforts are sincerely appreciated!
No. Probably just deferred for some kind of maintenance reason. Actually fairly common. Really is not a big deal as long as it's accounted for in the landing performance calculations.
At 0:11 did anyone notice that southwest has the split scimitar Winglets? That's awesome! Never seen a southwest 737-800 with scimitar winglets at MHT! Amazing footage BostonAirborn!
Packages pay a lot more than people. I was told the average passenger pays about $350 for a ticket. The weight of one passenger generates around $16,000 with overnight letters.
What's amazing is the clarity and focus with which that camera/you can pick up the aircraft making the hard left on approach with the gear still up. I've seen that angle before with the naked eye and the plane is barely a dot on the horizon. I'd like to see you post one that shows the entire approach - from that bank left with wheels up to touchdown. Great stuff.
Holy cow! o.O This is magnificent! Just.. speechless! Beautiful quality and superb camera work. I'm *so* going to share this on my Aviation Facebook page! Great job!
Oh wow Chris, I am so, so jealous, this is just spectacular!!! I love it!!! Woooowwwwww!!!!My camera is so old now that even the view finder doesn't work any more!
@@747heavyboeing3 Not sure what automatic engine start procedure the MD11 has except the AUTO Air System gives you air conditioning if you start #3 first.
Beautiful. Call it what you want, it's still a DC-10. The original Mickey-D tri-holer. Upgrade it, repaint it, do what you want to it, but she's a DC-10. The original Diva. Leave the MD prefix for the limo version.
just a question, im not too familiar on the engineering of an MD10 but... why did only the left engine reverse thrust? just curious or did i not see correctly
iAmColossus the number 1 and number 2 engine reversers were activated the number 3 engine might have had a problem with the reverser being that the other two were activated and not to mention the rudder was hard right I guess to compensate for the number 3 reverser.
It is a DC-10-10 that has been modernized with the MD-11 avionics (among other things). It is indeed an MD-10. An MD-11 would have winglets as well as a center landing gear between the main gear.
DC 10 is also shorter than an MD 11. I have worked on both for Fedex. DC 10 can't carry the same amount of cans (cargo) as an MD 11. Also if you watch an MD 11 video, there is a third landing gear in the middle rear of the plane. DC 10 doesn't have one.
A DC-10 that was converted + "upgraded" into a MD-10 for cargo service. I'll venture to guess it was a former legacy airline (AA, NW or UA) plane at one time.
Let me help some of you out. There are no winglets. No winglets = DC 10. Also this is a DC 10-10 which does not have the belly landing gear. The belly landing gear began with the DC 10-30. N306FE aka John (which was the hijacked plane) is a DC 10-30. Have a nice day.
Let me help you out too. This is an MD-10-10. FedEx no longer has any DC-10s. They were all converted to MD-10s many years ago. The aircraft N306FE is an MD-10-30.
ComfyBurrito as the plane touches down you see the smoke from the rear tires first then after the camera zooms in by the tires you can see the slight puff of smoke from the front landing gear as it touches the runway.
Awesome footage mate. Your vids are simply amazing. However, that's not we usually get to see, an MD-11 slowing down on only two reversers. Seems like the right one wasn't working
Plenty of gigs. Probably over 10 gigs for a 1 minute file. The software I use can only render 4k in AVI format. 1080p AVI files are very big even for a short video, nevermind 4K. Time for a software upgrade.
BostonAirborne Holy cow! I purchased the HDC TM-900 after watching your videos a while back, and I thought the file sizes for IT were large. They need to start making larger, affordable, and more reliable hard drives for video. Can't wait to see what else you produce with that beauty!
Looks like the number 3 engine's thrust reverser was locked out. Notice it does not deploy, and the pilot keeps right rudder throughout the reverse thrust. Great landing on two rev thrusters!
i noticed this as well, #3 thrust reverser is out. i wonder how long fedex lets planes operate like that before repair?
I saw that, too! Was wondering why it didn't open..
It is probably just deferred for some kind of maintenance reason. This is actually fairly common to have one deferred. It really is not a big deal as long as it is accounted for in the landing performance calculation for the airport. Once deferred they can be inoperative for however long as specified in the minimum equipment list.
Keeping the rudder and aileron crosswind correction in during the landing rollout is proper technique. As the airspeed slows, and the flight controls lose their effectiveness, and the wing stops producing lift, weight is transferred to the landing gear, and the X-wind correction is no longer needed. Around approximately 80 knots or so, you would then transfer to all nose-wheel steering control and wind correction is no longer needed.
how do you understand just by looking at it?
@@Kakiharaichii The cowling on the left engine (1) and the Vertical stabilizer engine open upon touchdown and you hear them spool up to reverse. The pilot is on right rudder to counteract the effect the reverse on 1 is having on the yaw caused by the starboard engine not participating.
Wow that is some fine video you shot there.. I'm up the road about 70miles from KMHT and (sim) fly through there frequently.. was there this morning with a Pierre Robinson 401.. You do some FIRST CLASS work there! Thanks for an enjoyable experience! Your efforts are sincerely appreciated!
Your quality is absolutely amazing!!!! That approach is definitely different, the MD-10 is great!!!! Liked a lot!
Nice video - so clear.
Old bird - 33 years old and still going strong.
I noticed that only the #1 and #2 reversers deployed...
Because of the wind?
No. Probably just deferred for some kind of maintenance reason. Actually fairly common. Really is not a big deal as long as it's accounted for in the landing performance calculations.
Man, I do miss home. Loved this video, Chris. Very well done.
At 0:11 did anyone notice that southwest has the split scimitar
Winglets? That's awesome! Never seen a southwest 737-800 with scimitar winglets at MHT! Amazing footage BostonAirborn!
Now that you mentioned it I noticed
Go figure: Cargo Planes land more smoothly then Passenger Planes. I guess First Class mail is worth it...
Packages don't complain about hard landings either.
Packages pay a lot more than people. I was told the average passenger pays about $350 for a ticket. The weight of one passenger generates around $16,000 with overnight letters.
Beautiful camera work, smooth and nicely framed. Well done
Beautiful footage. Splendid.
Flawless indeed! The tires barely smoked.
Which great turn into final!
Great video!
What's amazing is the clarity and focus with which that camera/you can pick up the aircraft making the hard left on approach with the gear still up. I've seen that angle before with the naked eye and the plane is barely a dot on the horizon. I'd like to see you post one that shows the entire approach - from that bank left with wheels up to touchdown. Great stuff.
Another magnificent video from Mr BostonAirborne, keep on making more like this one!!!
Smoothest landing ever !
Holy cow! o.O This is magnificent! Just.. speechless! Beautiful quality and superb camera work. I'm *so* going to share this on my Aviation Facebook page! Great job!
Thanks!!
Wow,great filming!Big LIKE!Greetings from Germany!
Crazy quality…Nice shot!!
Beautiful landing and awesome video! even when the plane is using just one reverse thrust ...
Amazing, look at the quality, seems unreal!
Really Top Shelf video, so clear.
OMG the Video Looks so perfect... Dat Quality
Wow this is just *plane* amazing! Thanks for the upload!
Holy crap that was amazing quality!! Loved it!!
with that 3rd engine, the MD11 is unmistakable! I've flown on one, Once, many_years ago. nice wide body!
WOW!
Amazing video!
More please!
Greetings from Germany!
The cargo must have been impressed!
Oh WOW!!! This is just spectacular! I love it! Superrrrrrrrrrrr!!!
phenomenal footage. keep feeding us.
Oh wow Chris, I am so, so jealous, this is just spectacular!!! I love it!!! Woooowwwwww!!!!My camera is so old now that even the view finder doesn't work any more!
Thanks Jen! You are welcome to buy my Canon SX50! :)
BostonAirborne
I may tussle her for it. haha.
lol
Beautiful aircraft.
Very nice, I wish I could see MD-11 or DC-10 someday..
Camera work is at level!
Awesome MD-11 landing video!
It’s not an Md-11
PERFECT AND BEAUTIFUL LANDING. I do that every time I drive in my garage with MY DC10.😊😊😊
Really awesome video mate! Greta catch! Liked!
Very nice!!! Lovely MD-10, interesting how the right engine didn't deploy reverse thrust.
Maybe it was MEL'ed
Nice camera work.
:D Finally spotter using the Lumix GH4.....AWESOME!!!!!!
Yes, the GH4 is an amazing piece of hardware!
Great shot
Absolutely awesome! flawless...
NICE!!! It was flawless but not all thrusters opened
Wonderful video!
Flawless capture!
The MD-10 is just a DC-10 with an MD-11 cockpit
Yes, basically
Not totally automatic engine start procedures like MD 11 has.
@@747heavyboeing3 Not sure what automatic engine start procedure the MD11 has except the AUTO Air System gives you air conditioning if you start #3 first.
@@georgeconway4360 Packs are off automatically on MD 11, not an MD 10.
@@747heavyboeing3 The Air System on the MD10 has no AUTO. I flew the MD11 20 years and the MD10 when it was first introduced.
Great quality!
Great Action and MD-10 Like.
Amazing quality video!!! :)
The third engine's reverse thruster wasn't working, but still an excellent landing and video! This aircraft is N362FE.
Was this the Manchester NH airport? I think it's called Manchester-Boston Regional Airport now.
Looks like MHT, Manchester, NH and Manchester-Boston (North) Regional Airport.
Can you give me the link where you bought your current equipment meaning the equipment which you used in this video, please??:-)
Welcome back!!
Beautiful. Call it what you want, it's still a DC-10. The original Mickey-D tri-holer. Upgrade it, repaint it, do what you want to it, but she's a DC-10. The original Diva. Leave the MD prefix for the limo version.
Does anyone know, is the base the parallel or perpendicular path to the runway?
Perpendicular.
Only one reverse thrust??? Awesome video!! :D
Why did only the left engine reverse thrust? I thought both engines were supposed to be in reverse thrust during landing.
Number 2 engine (center) reversed also seems like number 3 was broken
Only left engine reverse thrust working.
Aviation Nut and the number 2 engine
I miss these at SJC!!!
Outstanding video 4 thumb up! !!!!!!!!!!!
just a question, im not too familiar on the engineering of an MD10 but... why did only the left engine reverse thrust? just curious or did i not see correctly
iAmColossus i think an engine problem
iAmColossus the number 1 and number 2 engine reversers were activated the number 3 engine might have had a problem with the reverser being that the other two were activated and not to mention the rudder was hard right I guess to compensate for the number 3 reverser.
What a clean video. Lovely landing as well, but the right thrust reverser didn't deploy.
Was that supposed to happen?
None of them did. They used only the brakes & spoilers.
dapster Look more closely, at 1:40 you can see number 1 going into reverse and at 1:45 you can see number 2 is in reverse.
Must have been inop thus the use of only two thrust reversers
It all depends on the pilots and the length of the runway they might have not needed all three
Actually it is a MD-11, which is the DC-10 2.0 practically.
It is a DC-10-10 that has been modernized with the MD-11 avionics (among other things). It is indeed an MD-10. An MD-11 would have winglets as well as a center landing gear between the main gear.
DC 10 is also shorter than an MD 11. I have worked on both for Fedex. DC 10 can't carry the same amount of cans (cargo) as an MD 11. Also if you watch an MD 11 video, there is a third landing gear in the middle rear of the plane. DC 10 doesn't have one.
I agree. The MD-11 had added winglets with the center landing gear. DC-10's lacked any winglets, having flown on NWA and UA DC-10s in the past.
It’s an MD-10
Because the central landing gear is not down ?
It was a MD10-10 which does not have a center landing gear.
why only engine no.1 is reverse thrust?
This is the DC 10 by the way.
A DC-10 that was converted + "upgraded" into a MD-10 for cargo service. I'll venture to guess it was a former legacy airline (AA, NW or UA) plane at one time.
The MD-10 is an updated version of the DC-10 with new avionics and other various changes
It looks like engine Three's thrust Reverser did not deploy. Looks like it was look in place
Let me help some of you out. There are no winglets. No winglets = DC 10. Also this is a DC 10-10 which does not have the belly landing gear. The belly landing gear began with the DC 10-30. N306FE aka John (which was the hijacked plane) is a DC 10-30. Have a nice day.
Let me help you out too. This is an MD-10-10. FedEx no longer has any DC-10s. They were all converted to MD-10s many years ago. The aircraft N306FE is an MD-10-30.
are they only reversing the no.2 engine?
Ooh this is amazing
Little Firm, but beautiful Technique!
is it me or do i see a weird cloud of smoke or something as the plane touches down?
ComfyBurrito as the plane touches down you see the smoke from the rear tires first then after the camera zooms in by the tires you can see the slight puff of smoke from the front landing gear as it touches the runway.
Wow nice video! No reverse on the number 3?
Amazing
wheres the center landing gear?
oh...for some reason or another i've never heard of a MD-10 cool. that answers my question.
@@jonash6070 it was a DC-10-10 (now an MD-10-10) so it doesn’t have a middle gear. None of the -10 variants had them
Is there a certain reason why the right engine reverser didn't deploy after landing? Great video BTW!
YES!! This is so fantastic!! And your camera work is superb!! BIG LIKE!! :-)
I recently filmed a Lufthansa Cargo MD-11. Both are great rare bird! :-)
No engine three reverser?
I just saw this one in milwaukee yesterday
NIce! What memory card do you use? I cant seem to shoot 4K with my Sandisk 64GB 45mb/s card....
There's a difference between MD-10's and MD-11's?
*DC-10, MD-11 has winglets and is larger.
JoeyLovesTrains Engine
JoeyLovesTrains and advanced avionics and engines
The MD-10 is just a DC-10 with MD-11’s avionics
The MD10 is flown by MD11 Pilots.
Schubumkehr nur mit der linken Turbine???
Very nice footage! And by the way, I noticed some smoke in the background just when the MD-10 started to flare. Any idea what that was?
that's actually steam coming from a natural gas-fired power plant close to the airport
1:34
What is this O;O ?
Naor Looks like a large fire of some sort in the background... or it happened on 4/20 ;)
That would be the Calpine Granite Ridge power station.
You earned a sub
i think they did a good job
The clarity is unreal.
What was the smoke in the background?
Amazing!
Can I use this?
DC-10* Great vid!
My retinas...
The pilot forgot to reverse the thrust on the right engine, but that was an amazing landing.
BVERailer he didn't forget, it doesn't work that way
Awesome footage mate. Your vids are simply amazing. However, that's not we usually get to see, an MD-11 slowing down on only two reversers. Seems like the right one wasn't working
No winglets?
this is md 10 not md 11
awesome
Now what kind of file size are we talking here with 4K?
Plenty of gigs. Probably over 10 gigs for a 1 minute file. The software I use can only render 4k in AVI format. 1080p AVI files are very big even for a short video, nevermind 4K. Time for a software upgrade.
BostonAirborne Holy cow! I purchased the HDC TM-900 after watching your videos a while back, and I thought the file sizes for IT were large. They need to start making larger, affordable, and more reliable hard drives for video. Can't wait to see what else you produce with that beauty!
The reverser of engine 3 doesn't work!
Single engine reverser?
harshadso nope double, DC-10's, MD-10's and MD-11's have 3 engines and reverser's were an option. Maybe broken on the number 3 engine?
That's just a cracking Video ))))))
Снял круто, молодец!
Noticed no number 3 engine thrust reverser activated....interesting..
Oh boy...gotta slam on the brakes with that No.3 TR out.