Please make an updated version of this. This is by far the best (and funniest) explainer I have seen on this topic. I use it in many presentations but I now have to add 6 years of 'what happened next'...
16 year dark age under the corporatocracy, no kind of rennaissance in sight. Many religious people are not climate deniers. It's not in the culture of many faith communities to unite as one caring voice for Creation Stewardship and mercy for future generations. With a little leadership most people of faith are ready and able to take a stand.
The US signed (then Vice President Al Gore did on US citizen's behalf) but Republican Congress refused to ratify it. The good news was: The US actually ended up cutting a lot more emissions than many nations that signed and ratified, and subsequently failed to deliver (there were no consequences for countries like Canada, Russia, Austria and several others ). Not saying the protocol was unneeded, just that other factors (such as the fact that coal makes no economic sense) can help. Obviously it is better if international treaties actually work and everyone pulls in the same direction. But even if the US leaves Paris that does not automatically mean we are all fried (though it does raise the odds, let us be clear about that).
If in doubt of science: James Lawrence Powell has done a meta-study of 13950 peer reviewed scientific articles (1991-2012) on earths climate: only 24 deny global warming or point to a cause other than CO2.
The difference between then (when the Kyoto Protocol was drafted and this video was made) and now (during the Trump presidency in the US) is that then there was no denying that global warming was occurring. The question was who was going to have to paid to reduce global warming.
but who says the CO2 that is more produced has an effect to the climate change? its also possible that the plants just grow more due to the increased ammount of the gas. photosynthesis needs CO2 and so it would be quiet logic that the reaction can be done better and more. and to the methane.. ok but where does it go or to which product is it degraded? thx
Keep in mind that there are lobbies for "clean" energy as well. It isn't just oil companies. Also, because governments issue about 20 billion in grants for global warming research every year, there is also a funding bias on top of the lobbies. So, if you say money is an issue, you can't just stop the taxicab at oil companies and be happy. You have to investigate all sides to formulate your conclusion.
Basically they're saying stop using coal and stop progressing to developing countries while they already throw tons of emissions in totality out there.. Good for you rich countries.. Poor countries need to sacrifice progress to save the earth that been destroyed by rich countries... What a fair idea
It doesn't matter if I am a 'warmist' or 'denier' - what matters is the fact. The facts are that Sandy is a natural but extremely rare event - weather is complicated and that a storm is caused by the interaction of lots of different factors. Note, climate =/= weather. And, in our limited history in measuring weather and the triggers and causes for weather - there is no surprise people blame this on human induced 'climate change'.
Awesome as always. Makes u laugh and think. So, as long as we mess with the planet less than the planet messes with itself, it's cool? So, go ahead, create a floating island of plastic in the ocean the size of Connecticut, it's not as bad as a massive volcanic eruption! Is that the logic George?
Because we are wealthy. Our wealth comes from oil. We are also loudmouths when it comes to climate change. There is room for two, as we are rich enough from producing oil, so that we can buy our way out of the agreement we claim to promote. The flick is produced in Norway, so it is a kind of ironic portrayal of ourselves. Our culture used to focus on our effort, or lack thereof. Globalists brought the blame culture, and it turned of the lights. Stupidville next for Norway.
Richard Muller: "Call me a converted skeptic." (NY Times article, July 28, 2012, "The Conversion of a Climate Change Skeptic) Sadly it was his own propensity to announce his findings before publication that hampered the review process, which is still ongoing. Science and journalism come to odds at the junction of accuracy and publicity.
Lovely ad but still hard for anyone to accept it. We are a truly despicable to contemplate. I do hope that the patriarchal society which we inhabit will make haste before it is too late. Solutions are available but the money man rather keep his money in a safe haven...
In addition to this, check out my 'Climate Change Conspiracy? Is Global Warming a hoax?' vid to see what else slows down our action on climate change...
No skeptic I’ve met said that “… carbon dioxide from burning of fossil fuels will prove to be the greatest pollutant of human history. It is likely to have severe and detrimental effects on global climate.” (Richard Muller, 2003). So perhaps he became a skeptic later? Not so much. Richard Muller, 2008: “There is a consensus that global warming is real. …it’s going to get much, much worse.”
Lobbies are the biggest obstacles to evolution. Lobbies are the tool of the status quo that all generations to come will have to pay, for a couple multinationals to make huge profits now. I hope the billions added to the billions they had are worth it. I hope at least, they're enjoying all the cash. Everyone else but them will have to pay the price for it.
Wonder how many kilos of CO2 were emitted by private jets, travelling to those climate conferences...? What about more video-conferences to save the climate?
Don't worry about climate change, it's actually not the worst problem humanity is facing. At least it won't lead to human extinction. We might loose a lot of food resources, some coastal cities and land, fishing resources etc, but the industrial nations will be able to deal with it. We'll probably have to genetically engineer some new plants or stuff (probably a profitable market). And some few animals will die out, boohoo. Oh, and more extreme storms. And we might have to build some fences.
just to inform u all about CO2 emission the worldwide production of CO2 by human is 30 Gt (gigatonnes) per year. sounds quite much but on the other hand! the nature itself produces 770 Gt per year! for thos who are not good at math. about 4% of CO2 emission worldwide caused by human being. now tell me again how this can have an effect the climate change... there are many other gases we have to focus on.. just to name some they are methane or SO2 the end
Not sure where you've been researching, but 29,000 + scientific papers support human assisted climate change theory. How many counter said theory? Less than 20(and that's being generous). That's why one side is 'louder' - because it's the side of the argument overwhelmingly supported by the facts. Unfortunately, it isn't loud enough - as this video illustrates, it's an issue that is not being addressed.
+Dave W The climate we evolved and currently lived in is short range compared to possible climates. By pushing the limits, we risk a host devastating problems that we will more and more lose control over as time goes on and if we don't drastically change course. At an extreme (as a thought experiment), we are aware of climates in which any life on earth is clearly impossible by looking at other planets. Venus is an excellent example of an atmosphere with an extreme greenhouse gas situation. Again, I don't mean that we are close to a Venus-type climate, but to answer your question, humans are certainly not able to survive any climate. There is lot's of information online about these. If you have more specific questions, I'd be happy to answer them.
It is doing harm. There are many instances of increased extreme weather events which takes a serious toll on human systems and human life. There are already climate refugees. That said, I understand that this particular problem is not always easily seen. It's important to understand that these are very large scale trends that are not directly relatable to day to day experience on a personal level, depending on your region. But lot's of climate modelling by different scientists and countries are in agreement about climate change happening and the observed effects are also in agreement and this over decades.
Judging by your language, I am wondering why you're putting things like "events" and "instances" in quotations. Are you skeptical of my understanding out those words? Are you skeptical of news in general? This comment is in addition to the information that EquestrianGaming added above.
Really succinct. Disappointed by the racist annimations and undertones, though. Flags would have sufficed. And perhaps a pre-hand-shaking scene of the annex 1 countries achieving their growth from emissions and stealing land and labour from non-annex nations.
The last 15 years have, on average, been hotter than average recorded temperatures... several of the hottest years on record have been in the last decade... and you are trying to tell me that winter is coming? I wonder where you GOT that idea from?
"if in doubt of science"? what is that supposed to mean? And with regards to the info you presented that does not sway me one bit to believe that more thorough and recent studies prove that the 24 are correct and the 13926 are incorrect. Check the channel I mentioned in the previous comment and make your own judgments as to the reality of the situation.
I'm writing a research paper right now, and this video is a thousand times more helpful than any of the other sources I've found.
2021 gang!!
I am writing essay right now bro and I feel %100 like you
@@teslimolmayalım I have a rough draft due in a couple days. Thank you for reminding me about this video. Good luck
@@romanthechristian5237 You are welcome. Thanks for your good wishes. I hope you can handle your studies.
@@Dark_Striker_ 2023 gang!!
This is by far the cutest animation on Kyoto protocol
factuals
Please make an updated version of this. This is by far the best (and funniest) explainer I have seen on this topic. I use it in many presentations but I now have to add 6 years of 'what happened next'...
your wish has been granted
Even though the actual situation is terrible, this was so cute!
We watched this today in our English lesson. We really love your choice for the background music. Nice animation by the way :)
Thank you! 😃 And here's the "sequel" th-cam.com/video/qfAeoBGS3Ek/w-d-xo.html :) about the Paris agreement!
I am working about Kyoto protocol for my school project and this video helped me more than Wikipedia!! XD
Same here
We watched this today on our Principles of Env Sciences class in Wageningen. This was good🎉
Hell, I will never ever get this melody out of my head again!!!
Amazing videos for my green bonds webinar! Thanks CICERO!
16 year dark age under the corporatocracy, no kind of rennaissance in sight. Many religious people are not climate deniers. It's not in the culture of many faith communities to unite as one caring voice for Creation Stewardship and mercy for future generations. With a little leadership most people of faith are ready and able to take a stand.
Wonderful depiction....easily understood by Children. Thank you.
You couldn´t explain it better.
I don't know why, but I find the melody amazingly humorous.
This was sooooooooooooo cute!!! And it's true, we're damaging our only home, we have to fix what we've done.
US did not sign Kyoto Protocol. They did not cut anything. They are still going full speed.
Nor did Australia. Now we are dredging a channel through the Great Barrier Reef to coal port. *sigh*
The US signed (then Vice President Al Gore did on US citizen's behalf) but Republican Congress refused to ratify it.
The good news was: The US actually ended up cutting a lot more emissions than many nations that signed and ratified, and subsequently failed to deliver (there were no consequences for countries like Canada, Russia, Austria and several others ). Not saying the protocol was unneeded, just that other factors (such as the fact that coal makes no economic sense) can help.
Obviously it is better if international treaties actually work and everyone pulls in the same direction.
But even if the US leaves Paris that does not automatically mean we are all fried (though it does raise the odds, let us be clear about that).
oldi184 hmmm hm hm hm hmmmm oh no its stuck in my head
The executive signed it. Congress refused to implement it.
This is terrific!
Love this, A upgraded version would be amazing !!
Thanks! Have you seen the video about the Paris agreement? th-cam.com/video/qfAeoBGS3Ek/w-d-xo.html
Australia should clip its self ever so slightly then scream in the background for the rest of the video and demand everyone else cut instead.
omg this is the funniest interpretation of the deals lol
Thanks :) also check out our Paris-video th-cam.com/video/qfAeoBGS3Ek/w-d-xo.html&lc=Ugzla0mDdIkkJy_QBmR4AaABAg the sequel!
Try to put the speed at 2...it's so cool!
Stupendous summation of "blame game" that thwarts any real effort to change!
If in doubt of science: James Lawrence Powell has done a meta-study of 13950 peer reviewed scientific articles (1991-2012) on earths climate: only 24 deny global warming or point to a cause other than CO2.
6 years later, still catchy AF
Now I understand. Thank you for this.
Please please make one about the energy transition !! This is hillarious X-D !
beautiful video
Here because of Sander
+Laurens Peeters All Hail Beardman
+Mythix2 Beardman for president
+Laurens Peeters **Sanders*
+Laurens Peeters I want to see him fix teh deficit before he adds more to the bill.
im here because our biology teacher
The difference between then (when the Kyoto Protocol was drafted and this video was made) and now (during the Trump presidency in the US) is that then there was no denying that global warming was occurring. The question was who was going to have to paid to reduce global warming.
Love it :D Simply amazing and cute!
The video :D
The situation D:
I will use this to teach the college class on diplomacy. Very damn useful and funny LOL!
Two cigars signifies that Norway is highly developed. Some sources indicate that Norway is the "most developed" country.
That was the best one!
Excellent animation! The music fit really well, too.
I'm just a little embarrassed that I don't know what country is at 1:00
Awesome video
Fantastic!!
One word: Awesome
Great work
Can someone explain that what exactly climate negotiation is ?
DOES SOMEONE KNOW WHAT IS THE NAME OF THIS SONG?
'Lekkere Soep' by De Gouden Nachtegaaltjes
darude sandstorm
Running in the 90's
No
Yep, that about sums it up.
They seriously need to show this at the next one.
great video
Hey at least we cutted CFCs and saved the ozone layer
QUESTION: What do governments propose to do about the rest of the planets in the solar system that are also heating up? 🤔
Firstly, Muller was never a skeptic, and secondly BEST has never passed peer-review. But never let facts get in the way of your stories.
Every international treaty ever
but who says the CO2 that is more produced has an effect to the climate change? its also possible that the plants just grow more due to the increased ammount of the gas. photosynthesis needs CO2 and so it would be quiet logic that the reaction can be done better and more.
and to the methane.. ok but where does it go or to which product is it degraded?
thx
OMG amazing !
youtube to mp3 converter?
This clip is an addiction. What's the title of the music please!
Forgot the exploding planet at the end
Keep in mind that there are lobbies for "clean" energy as well. It isn't just oil companies. Also, because governments issue about 20 billion in grants for global warming research every year, there is also a funding bias on top of the lobbies.
So, if you say money is an issue, you can't just stop the taxicab at oil companies and be happy. You have to investigate all sides to formulate your conclusion.
Basically they're saying stop using coal and stop progressing to developing countries while they already throw tons of emissions in totality out there.. Good for you rich countries.. Poor countries need to sacrifice progress to save the earth that been destroyed by rich countries... What a fair idea
why does denmark look like that? 0:13
It doesn't matter if I am a 'warmist' or 'denier' - what matters is the fact. The facts are that Sandy is a natural but extremely rare event - weather is complicated and that a storm is caused by the interaction of lots of different factors.
Note, climate =/= weather. And, in our limited history in measuring weather and the triggers and causes for weather - there is no surprise people blame this on human induced 'climate change'.
Má-li někdo zájem, vytvořila jsem k videu české titulky. Video najdete pod názvem Historie klimatických vyjednávání v 83 vteřinách
Why is UK shown as separate country from EU, while it is part of it?
Its not
THIS VIDEO IS ADORABLE AAAA
Thanks! And here's the "sequel" th-cam.com/video/qfAeoBGS3Ek/w-d-xo.html :)
Awesome as always. Makes u laugh and think. So, as long as we mess with the planet less than the planet messes with itself, it's cool? So, go ahead, create a floating island of plastic in the ocean the size of Connecticut, it's not as bad as a massive volcanic eruption! Is that the logic George?
Awesome video! :)
Because we are wealthy. Our wealth comes from oil. We are also loudmouths when it comes to climate change. There is room for two, as we are rich enough from producing oil, so that we can buy our way out of the agreement we claim to promote. The flick is produced in Norway, so it is a kind of ironic portrayal of ourselves. Our culture used to focus on our effort, or lack thereof. Globalists brought the blame culture, and it turned of the lights. Stupidville next for Norway.
Richard Muller: "Call me a converted skeptic." (NY Times article, July 28, 2012, "The Conversion of a Climate Change Skeptic)
Sadly it was his own propensity to announce his findings before publication that hampered the review process, which is still ongoing. Science and journalism come to odds at the junction of accuracy and publicity.
This video is sick!
You mean as in "awesome"? ;-D Gotta translate for the older crowd here. LOL.
aha sorry, as in Really Good!
uhm except for the US refused to sign kyoto, or at least the US administration did not consider it binding.
Lovely ad but still hard for anyone to accept it. We are a truly despicable to contemplate.
I do hope that the patriarchal society which we inhabit will make haste before it is too late. Solutions are available but the money man rather keep his money in a safe haven...
What is the main message ?
Maybe someone can help Veronika out?
Main message: no one wants to take responsibility regarding climate change
great video - where do i get the music from it :D?
thanks that helped a lot! :)
Where the heck is New Zealand????
there's no arguing about if there's global warming actually. it's probably irreversible at this point. check out the film Chasing Ice.
Haha Exellent work!!
When will the fashion for patronising, cuddly cartoons on environmental matters ever end? Bring back the era of James Burke and Jacob Bronowski.
um... gosh. very little update needed to be current 2018. Check the BBC report www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-46496967
Real nice
yep that's about it. Nothing achieved.
In addition to this, check out my 'Climate Change Conspiracy? Is Global Warming a hoax?' vid to see what else slows down our action on climate change...
Song name? :D
De geschiedenis van klimaatonderhandelingen in 83 seconden. Nu serieus in #Doha?
That it's way each of the last ten years have been the hottest year in history.
Shit, I cant get this song out of my head
Yes, this is actually what is happening. Nobody is bothered about the actual issue.
It's so interesting
No skeptic I’ve met said that “… carbon dioxide from burning of fossil fuels will prove to be the greatest pollutant of human history. It is likely to have severe and detrimental effects on global climate.” (Richard Muller, 2003). So perhaps he became a skeptic later? Not so much. Richard Muller, 2008: “There is a consensus that global warming is real. …it’s going to get much, much worse.”
Lobbies are the biggest obstacles to evolution. Lobbies are the tool of the status quo that all generations to come will have to pay, for a couple multinationals to make huge profits now. I hope the billions added to the billions they had are worth it. I hope at least, they're enjoying all the cash. Everyone else but them will have to pay the price for it.
if this topic was not put into animation and a shorter way, I would not have watched it
lol at least everyone can agree that this has become a non issue since we havent seen any warming in a long time now.
Wonder how many kilos of CO2 were emitted by private jets, travelling to those climate conferences...? What about more video-conferences to save the climate?
Trueee 😂
Really not much compared to potential cuts that were pledged.
Don't worry about climate change, it's actually not the worst problem humanity is facing. At least it won't lead to human extinction. We might loose a lot of food resources, some coastal cities and land, fishing resources etc, but the industrial nations will be able to deal with it. We'll probably have to genetically engineer some new plants or stuff (probably a profitable market). And some few animals will die out, boohoo. Oh, and more extreme storms. And we might have to build some fences.
just to inform u all about CO2 emission
the worldwide production of CO2 by human is 30 Gt (gigatonnes) per year. sounds quite much but on the other hand! the nature itself produces 770 Gt per year! for thos who are not good at math. about 4% of CO2 emission worldwide caused by human being. now tell me again how this can have an effect the climate change...
there are many other gases we have to focus on.. just to name some they are methane or SO2
the end
Kazoos make everything better
Agree! Kazoos also in the sequel :) th-cam.com/video/qfAeoBGS3Ek/w-d-xo.html&lc=Ugzla0mDdIkkJy_QBmR4AaABAg
i think it's portugal
Not sure where you've been researching, but 29,000 + scientific papers support human assisted climate change theory. How many counter said theory? Less than 20(and that's being generous).
That's why one side is 'louder' - because it's the side of the argument overwhelmingly supported by the facts. Unfortunately, it isn't loud enough - as this video illustrates, it's an issue that is not being addressed.
Bolivia.
I want to be fair... what problem do we have from any climate ?
+Dave W The climate we evolved and currently lived in is short range compared to possible climates. By pushing the limits, we risk a host devastating problems that we will more and more lose control over as time goes on and if we don't drastically change course. At an extreme (as a thought experiment), we are aware of climates in which any life on earth is clearly impossible by looking at other planets. Venus is an excellent example of an atmosphere with an extreme greenhouse gas situation. Again, I don't mean that we are close to a Venus-type climate, but to answer your question, humans are certainly not able to survive any climate.
There is lot's of information online about these. If you have more specific questions, I'd be happy to answer them.
+ljkolnick Hi ....OK with respect, how can I get worried about a huge problem that has not yet done any harm . Venus ? OK
It is doing harm. There are many instances of increased extreme weather events which takes a serious toll on human systems and human life. There are already climate refugees.
That said, I understand that this particular problem is not always easily seen. It's important to understand that these are very large scale trends that are not directly relatable to day to day experience on a personal level, depending on your region. But lot's of climate modelling by different scientists and countries are in agreement about climate change happening and the observed effects are also in agreement and this over decades.
+ljkolnick OK which "instances" and which "events"and what "particular problems" are we supposed to have Faith in? Doing harm ? Where?
Judging by your language, I am wondering why you're putting things like "events" and "instances" in quotations. Are you skeptical of my understanding out those words? Are you skeptical of news in general?
This comment is in addition to the information that EquestrianGaming added above.
Done
Really succinct. Disappointed by the racist annimations and undertones, though. Flags would have sufficed. And perhaps a pre-hand-shaking scene of the annex 1 countries achieving their growth from emissions and stealing land and labour from non-annex nations.
The last 15 years have, on average, been hotter than average recorded temperatures... several of the hottest years on record have been in the last decade... and you are trying to tell me that winter is coming? I wonder where you GOT that idea from?
The us is cutting emission and the eu is too
"if in doubt of science"? what is that supposed to mean? And with regards to the info you presented that does not sway me one bit to believe that more thorough and recent studies prove that the 24 are correct and the 13926 are incorrect. Check the channel I mentioned in the previous comment and make your own judgments as to the reality of the situation.
We watched in geography