Before You Use Canon Lenses on a Sony Camera...
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 22 ส.ค. 2024
- As I've been experimenting with different mirrorless camera options from Sony, like the a7S ii & a7R ii, I've tried using both native Sony lenses and adapting Canon lenses to them.
Check today's prices below: geni.us/metabones
I've had a less than stellar experience using Canon glass on Sony bodies, so I wanted to share a little bit about what you can expect if you're trying to make the switch to Sony from Canon and plan to bring a bunch of EF or EF-S lenses along with you for the ride.
In this video I explain which of the many adapters I recommend getting, my experience with the speed and reliability of auto-focus in both photo and video mode, and whether I even recommend keeping your Canon lenses when you make a switch to mirrorless cameras.
Special thanks to B&H for loaning me the a7R ii to use and be on the lookout for my full review next week.
🛒 Check today's prices below:
* Sony a7S ii - bhpho.to/21Zsexf
* Sony a7R ii - bhpho.to/25ZVC66
* Fotodiox Adapter - bhpho.to/1XskVv1
* Metabones Adapter - bhpho.to/1QDrWnj
* Sony 85mm G-Master Lens - bhpho.to/1Pl0yNy
* Sony 55mm f1.8 Lens - bhpho.to/1WxhCCs
- - - - - - - - -
❤️ SUBSCRIBE TO THIS TH-cam CHANNEL 📺
Click here to subscribe: / @calebwojcik
🎧 LISTEN TO MY PODCAST 🎵
Click here to listen to my podcast: www.calebwojcik...
- - - - - - - - -
🔧GEAR I USE
Below is a list of gear I use to film my TH-cam videos. For a complete list of all equipment I recommend for photography and filmmaking, go to www.DIYVideoGuy...
(Below are affiliate links & I will earn a commission %.)
🎥 CAMERAS
- VIDEO - Canon C70 - geni.us/canonC70
- PHOTO - Canon R5 - geni.us/Canon-...
- EF to RF FULL-FRAME 0.71x ADAPTER - geni.us/EF-Ada...
- BTS - GoPro Hero 8 Black - geni.us/GoproH...
👓 LENSES
- Sigma 18-35mm 1.8 - geni.us/Sigma-...
- 35mm L - geni.us/35mmcanon
- 50mm L - geni.us/50mmcanon
- 85mm L - geni.us/85mmcanon
- 100mm L “Macro” - geni.us/canon100mm
- 24-105mm L - geni.us/24105mm
- 40mm "Pancake" - geni.us/canon40mm
🎤 AUDIO
- RODE Videomic Pro Plus (on camera mic) - geni.us/rodevmp...
- Rode NTG-3 (shotgun mic) - geni.us/rodentg3
- Shure SM7B (podcast mic) - geni.us/ShureS...
- Sound Devices MixPre-6 (audio recorder) - geni.us/mixpre-6
- DBX 286s (mic preamp) - geni.us/dbx-286s
- sE DM1 Dynamite Premap (+28db for SM7B) - geni.us/DM1-Dy...
💡 LIGHTING
- Aputure 120D II (Key Light) - geni.us/120dii
- Aputure Light Dome II (Soft Box) - geni.us/Aputur...
- Aputure LS1 (Hair Light) - geni.us/ls1s
💻 SOFTWARE & APPS
- Edited with Adobe Premiere, After Effects, & Creative Cloud - geni.us/adobecr...
- My Favorite Licensed Music for TH-cam (Get 1 Month FREE) - geni.us/musicb...
- Best Tool for Managing Your TH-cam Channel (FREE Chrome Extension) - geni.us/youtub...
- Get Transcripts made by Rev ($10 FREE Coupon) - geni.us/transcr...
- - - - - - - - -
💻 FREE COURSES
Video Gear for Any Budget (7-Day Email Course) - www.diyvideosch...
Learn Adobe Premiere Pro 101 (Free Course) - www.calebw.com/...
Learn Final Cut Pro X 101 (Free Course) - www.calebw.com/...
- - - - - - - - -
📱FOLLOW CALEB ON SOCIAL MEDIA
INSTAGRAM: / calebwojcik
TWITTER: / calebwojcik
Dude, you need to do some more testing. Been using the 35mm 1.4L Mark II on my a7III with the Sigma adapter. Works perfectly. No problems with Eye AF either. You recommend sticking to Sony glass. Ofcourse you want native glass but the problem is that Sonys used prices are insane and you get much better price on used glass if you buy Canon glass.
Hey brother i need your help I want a Sony but I have ef lens the mount you’re talking about works well? I have sigma ef lens and want a Sony ff mirrorless but want like to keep my sigma lens. Please help Ty!
CANON 35 LENS IS FABULOUS LENS BUT DOES IT WORK IN VIDEO MODE AF CONTINUES WITH EYE TRACKING AF OR PHOTO MODE ONLY?
I will never sell my L series lenses. I have successfully used Canon 85 mm 1.2 L II for amazing results with reasonable AF using Metabone Ultra. Your experience may have been with older lenses and probably older rev of Metabone. I also use 24 mm 1.4 L and Canon Fisheye plus 16-35 version II L. None of these lenses have caused any grief and results are outstanding.
I agree!
What camera body?
I have a Canon 24mm 1.4 II AND A cANON 70-200MM 2.8 usm II. I want to move from my 6D to a Sony A7III. Do u think my lenses will works perfectly with some adapters in Sony Cameras for videos and photos or I will never have the same performance of this lenses as I have in my Canon body?
Smart. I still have premium Nikon lenses that I will never part with.
From my experience with Canon L lenses on A7 II and Sigma MC-11, things are not as you suggested, but much better:
- the combo is awesome for photos, stills but also fast moving subjects
- face detection mode focuses already on the eyes, no need for eye af!
- best mode for fast af is the wide area
- focus is very fast, similar speed with my Canon camera 5DII, depends on lens speed of course, some lenses are blazing fast on both cameras, some are slower on both cameras
- using the MC-11 with Canon L lenses is not good for video, a lot of hunting and focus noise, should use Sony lenses for that purpose
Anyone who shoots video will not be using auto focus, only manual, so that's not an issue.
@@OustFox that’s what I thought. But I see a lot of people shooting videos for product reviews and courses that use autofocus so that when they maybe hold something up to the camera, the autofocus dies it’s thing. It’s handy as they move around, I frame, also.
3:26 haha I love how it just starts cropping in
I agree. Native > Non Native in majority of cases. The price of the Sony lens is what makes it hard. If I had to redo it all over again I would have saved up and purchased only Sony Native lens. For my A7s2 my line up would be Sony 16-35mm F4 and 28-135mm G lens. For my A7r2 pretty much the same as above but add a Sony 55mm 1.8, 90mm Macro 2.8 and a 70-200mm F4.
Yep, I totally agree. Thanks for sharing.
I do feel like getting started on sony is super easy, since you can just put any old lens on it, but then there aren't really cheap native lenses, you either get base ones or super-good ones
Ry Clark Media Arts this is including video filming?
the only thing holding me back from getting the a7iii is the lack of a flip screen.
Which one has one only reason why I want the canon 90d any advice?
instead of using aps-c mode which prevents you from filming in 4k, you can just simply digitally zoom in until you get rid of vignetting and black edges. this is going to let you film in 4k even with an apsc lens.
I know this video is a couple of years old, but I'm having great success using Canon glass on my Sony a7rii. I use the Sigma MC-11 adapter and use it with Canon 24-105 IS STM L glass, Canon 50 1.8 STM, and an older 100-300 Canon lens. Auto focus is quick and precise. The only thing I don't have is Auto Eye Focus. I wouldn't use this set up for videos unless in manual, but for still photography, it works wonderfully and I've gotten beautiful, crisp, sharp photos. I also have the Sony 28 F2 and Sony 85 1.8 which are great too. But if I only had one walk about lens, it would be between the Canon L 24-105 or Canon 50 1.8. I've owned two Sony FE 50. 1.8 lens and the auto focus was terrible. I far prefer the image quality and focus on the Canon 50mm. The best part, I got the Canon 50mm lens on sale, new for 81 dollars, and the Canon L 24-105 used for $350. The Canon 100-300 I got used for about 70 dollars. Up to 200mm the pictures are as crisp and wonderful as the Canon 70-200 L lens I had.
Did you notice any hunting using the Canon 24-105 F4?
Not for me. Works great with my MC-11 adapter and Sony a7rii
Do you think the af on a Canon 200 2.8 on an a7rii with mc11 would be fast enough for sports or birding?
@@nicedward7544 if it was an a7riii, I would say, yes. But you would have some hits and misses. Plus with the riii, you have eye af too. But with the a7rii, it would work, but more misses than hits. I have both cameras. I would rather use the aiii, or one of their apsc cameras with a native lens for sports. You can shoot sports with the a7rii, but be prepared for a lot of missed shots. I just shot some track last weekend with the a7riii and an old canon 200mm.f2.8 lens. With your combo, birding would be tough. Plus for shooting birds, you would need at least a 300-400mm lens.
@@martin9410 honestly all I'm worried about is my hummingbirds around my house lol. I get great shots with my 85 Samyang just need a bit more reach. They are either pretty static or impossible. As long as AF is decent I'd be ok. Other than that I'd be using it in much slower circumstances. I'm guessing the 200 2.8 is so old I probably couldn't rent it anymore. I had one yearsss ago on a 5dii and the AF was the fastest I'd ever seen at the time.
thanks for this feedback, just what I was looking for. Think I'll offload my canon glass and stick with native Sony lenses. Good video, short concise, and to the point. Well done mate.
I have A7iii and use Sigma MC-11 adaptor with Canon 100mm 2.8 macro, if I set the focus to center only, AF works fine without hunting, also tried 300mm 2.8+Extender 1.4 III and center focus works like a charm, even faster than 80D body.
Do you still recommend the Sony aiii now in 2022 I have ef lens Ty
@@topshelf223 yes, I still use it for portraits
Thanks for posting this! We are thinking about swapping our Osmo Pro for either the A7S or the a6500. We are invested in Canon glass since we shoot our photos with the 5Dmk3, but comparing the new MK4 to the Sony bodies, it's looking like Sony is the way to go for video.
Or the 1DX MkII. I have the 1DX as a primary body and A6300 with an adapter as secondary. Works great.
Another review on YT shows the Canon autofocus working well with a Sigma adapter and an a6500.
I use a right angle bracket when shooting my A6500 on a tripod. This elevates the camera body about a half inch higher and also easily allows me to switch from horizontal to vertical positions without having to hang my camera cantilevered on its side for vertical compositions...
Isn't it a bit of a generic statement to claim anything about "Canon Lenses"? ALL of them? I just saw a test with A7rII + metabones + canon ef 24-105L f/4 and it was pretty quick and reliable, even with AF-C and tracking, as opposite to the example you showed.
This is an older video, and with firmware updates I've heard the same thing. The focus speed and capabilities have gotten better. TH-cam doesn't really give you an option for "updating" videos though. :(
Caleb Wojcik sadly, you might have to reupload the video if you want to update that...
Caleb Wojcik I want to buy the a7s ll and a canon adaptor. Are you saying that the autofocus and other specs from this adaptor works better now?
Caleb Wojcik with keeping this video online and not putting disclaimer in a pinned comment or description, you seem to be very unreliable and biased.
Sony A7III + Canon L lenses are a bomb combination. You used older glass.
Updates made it even better.
I appreciate this vid was made some time ago, and there have been updates. I’m using the A7r3 I have a large range of both Canon L and Sigma art they all work very well with the MC11 in fact my Canon 1.8 50 focuses faster than the Sony 50. I also have the meta bones 4 I don’t find it as good as the sigma.
VERY HELPFULL
So go ahead and buy a Sony? I have so many ef lens Ty
is this auto focus in video ? Thank you!
I use Metabones IV for my canon lenses. I don't have any problem using auto focus, just as quick! The fotodiox will increase the lens focus length (canon 50mm will became 60mm).
+harbin guy Great to hear it has gotten better with firmware.
The reason I bought a a7iii was so that I can use my m-mount Zeiss and Voigtlander lens in manual and get full frame. Works great.
Native lenses, whether made by Sony or others like Zeiss are the best for autofocus on Sony, but the joy of mirrorless like the Sony or Panasonic etc, is the image magnification which makes manual focus a breeze. Native glass still has an advantage because of exif data, but as far as usability goes, older Nikon lenses with aperture rings, and Canon FD mount glass are a joy to use on the Sony bodies and give access to the specialty lenses that are not present in the native line-up. Older Nikon lenses are surprisingly cheap considering their superb quality, but too often get left out of the conversation. The manual focus Nikon’s and the Canon FD solve the size problem, and at any given focal length are the best value for money on a Sony full frame mirrorless camera.
The a7R II and the Metabones Smart Adapter mk4 T with certain Canon lenses work as good as the same lenses natively with the Canon 5D mk3. Those two lenses are 24-70 f2.8L II and 70-200 f2.8L II (they both focus instantly and accurately!), and the 100-400 f4.5-5.6L II also works, but it's much slower (it's also slower with a Canon body). These 3 Canon lenses have a superb image quality and sharpness.
I also tried the Canon 85mm f1.8 (non-L) with the a7R II. It is a wonderful lens, but it doesn't want to find focus with the a7R II when it's a bit darker than normal outdoor daylight or sunshine. It didn't focus indoors.
I once tried the Canon 300mm f2.8 prime, and it also worked quite well. The 50mm f1.2 also works, but not as good as the 24-70 f2.8 and 70-200 f2.8 which are my favorites.
The a7S II autofocus doesn't really work well with adapted lenses.
A7III,A7RIII and later bodies auto focus well with most primes in AF-S mode. I get face and eye AF too. I am using a Medabones IV with ver 66 firmware.
for Ultra fast focus, for video shooting, Sony lenses are must. And while one can manually focus easily with peaking and zoom, I uses manual lenses from Voigtlander to Mamiya Hasselblade with $9 adapters. The main advantage is you can see actual DOF before clicking (unlike with AF lenses).(in A or M modes exposure is automatically taken care by Auto ISO enabled)
I recommend all canon users to wait a bit have some patience, Canon soon to release mirrorless pro bodies that will revolutionise mirrorless, including newly developed IBiS, so don’t sell your soul yet!! Sony is all muscle but no soul, Canon has soul!
Well they better, because the Eos R and RP were pretty shit.
@@jkerman5113 not now, now canon have better eos R5 and 6 and with canon adapter all my canon L Lenses work better than on sony A7 cameras, now sony have problem lol
Hi Caleb. Thanks for the video, but I have to strongly disagree, at least for video applications. I have an a7sII that I use 90% of the time for video. I have both Sony native e-mount lenses and Canon L series zoom lenses, and I use my Canon lenses almost all of time for shooting video.
The main reason is Sony’s/Zeiss incomprehensible decision to use focus-by-wire in their e-mount lenses. Anyone who has ever tried to do a rack-focus or hit a specific focus point with a focus-by-wire lens knows that it is extremely difficult to do. And to your argument about AF not working optimally with an adapter, in video applications, most serious cinematographers use manual focus.
However, for photo applications, I use Sony native lenses exclusively.
So, in my case, it depends on if your shooting video or photos. But since most people who purchase an a7sII will do so for shooting video, I highly recommend holding
on to your Canon glass!
+ATOMIK LAB - Web Agency Thanks for chiming in with your experience. It really helps the community to hear as my opinion isn't the only one!
Forgot to mention, aside from the esthetics of the images produced by Canon glass which many find more pleasing than the cold "clinical" look of Sony lenses, Canon EF mount is an industry standard and these lenses will keep their value for years to come. Many of the top camera bodies offer an EF mount version (RED, Blackmagic, Canon, etc.). The same is not true with e-mount. So once you go down this road, you're stuck with it. As technology evolves, and your needs evolve, chances are you will want to upgrade your camera. But good glass stays with you. So in a nutshell, I would definitely build a kit around the glass and not around the camera. Much more future proof in my humble opinion.
What do you think Caleb?
@@atomik-lab can you confirm if it's possible to digital zoom-in to confirm focus using canon glass while recording with an adaptor? I am about to switch to a7 iii to have that feature and now I am scared...
So you think my sigma lens with a booster in a Sony will be ok? Ty
I have the Sony a 7MII and used to have the same problem focusing my Canon lenses with the adapter, Solution: changed the Focus system in the menu to contrast NOT to Phase detection. problem solve.
I use the a6300 with Speedbooster and a Canon 24-105mm and I get Face Detect and Punch in zoom, I only lack Eye AF and Lock On AF.
+Peter Kent Nice! The newer firmware must have added those.
Thank you, just what I needed to know... I'm so sad though about all my investment on canon lenses, here's to hoping Canon can compete with sony in the near future...
it really depends on what lenses u have and pot luck if the adapter works. i have the a6300. adapters i have are 1. metabones speedbooster (msb) and 2. $50 chinese ef to e mount non speedbooster (efe) i will call them abbreviated names for speed ... the msb works perfect on the canon 17-40 and canon 50f1.4 (focus is fast and amazing and even continuous in video). the msb works just ok with the canon 24-105f4L and canon 70-200f4L (focus is fast and accurate when it feels like ot 75% of the time... sometimes it doesnt want to). msb with canon 100-400 doesnt work autofocus at all. the efe adapter doesnt work on any of the lenses, but on the canon 100-400 is flawless... super fast acurated autofocus! obviously eye autofocus doesnt work, but face detection and continuous work great on the ones mentioned above. cheers
I agree completely. I bought to the Fotodiox to use w/ a Sony NEX, and neither a 25-105 L series or a 50mm "nifty fifty" has autofocus that's usable at all. It just constantly hunts. However, it's still a nice adapter to have if you're willing to manually focus, or for controlled video environments.
Agreed. Manual focusing is the price you pay.
I use the metabones with the latest version firmware with an a7rii and canon ef 300 2.8 L lens. Works great in the standard mode but limited to more of the centre of the frame. The new advanced mode gives you the full frame using hybrid focus which also works well and works with video reasonably. You should test it as its better
Great video! Have any changes about this topic nowadays? I´m a Canon user and I want to buy a Sony A7iii but i have afraid about my Canon lenses don´t works 100% for video and foto in a Sony Cam.
One of the few or only videos with some truth! So frustrating using the Metabones4 with Canon 24-70L I, Even the 70-200 L-I, But manual focus with peaking opens a new world of shooting with old lenses.
Which one you recommend as a blogging camera canon 80D or Sony a6500
For vlogging I think the 80D is better for autofocus and having the screen that flips back towards you.
Sony a6600 best money can buy bruh
a6600
I'm only just looking at adaptors for my Canon glass to Sony e-mount and after watching your video realise it'll soon be three years old. But I still think it's very relative to my search for the right adaptor. I think in the end and for subjective reason you are right in suggesting sticking to Sony glass, I have decided however to purchase the EOS-NEX K&F Concept for a mere £17.00 Sterling. It will allow me to use a lot of my Canon glass, 70-200 mkii 16-35 f1.8 and others, maybe not all the features will work correctly but hay, it's only a few quid, and allows me to use my Canon lenses and anyway, maybe I'll adapt. Thanks Celeb.
Eyes Focus only with native E-Mount Sony lenses... Great camera... ASPC-35 is perfect with Sony A7RII, also with Sony A99... DMF focus is real pleasure to use in low light situation... Minolta 28mm f/.2.8, Minolta 70-210 f/.4, Sony 16 f/.2.8 (Fisheye) and Sigma 35 f/1.4 A-Mount with Sony LA-EA4 (Adapter) works perfect in A-Mount and E-Mount (No regret)... Great IQ, sharpness and portables! All that lenses and adapter for $.2,000.00
When you have enough money to buy native's lenses, there's no point to use an Adapters.
Good to know it works. How do you control the aperture of the lens on a Sony body? Is it pretty much the same as on a Canon?
I get very decent af performance with Sigma mC-11 and Sony 7Rii. There is no eye focus and it does hunt a bit in low light but works very well in better light. On the other hand Sigma 35 art works perfectly with all AF features supported.
The first statement refering to these adapters is. Use the Sony focus peaking feature!
What i do is use a canon full frame dslr and L glass for sport wildlife and landscape(because of the L glass) and sony mirrorless for most other stuff but especially street but i use m42 lenses with an adapter to keep costs down
Please help me! Is no way to put rf lenses to sony a6400 camera??
I just switched to Sony A6600 from Canon. Thanks! I'l try to use the canon
35mm
How’s the a6600 so far? I’m thinking of switching to Sony from canon with my ef lens Ty
zoom in effect focusing still works on any lens regardless since its using sensor for that i have used fd glass on a7s II it works on that or any lens
have seen some recent reviews of using canon glass on newer a7r3 and r4 and metabones at least where autofocus/face/eye works great now with canon lenses.
Great video. You save me from buying a Sony used camera and an adaptor to mount my Canon lenses.
Glad I could help!
I'm thinking to buy the Sony a6500 mainly for video, but I have canon lenses: The 18 135 EFS and the 50mm 1.4. Do you recommend me to buy Kipon EF-S to E Converter v2 for using my lenses in?
What did you end up doing I’m going to Sony but have ef glasses Ty
Did you test any of stabilized canon lenses on sony body? Cuz I'm very curious if IS will work properly with any adapter.
Thanks for the helpful information. I'd been contemplating this exact change, looking to upgrade from my 6D. While on vacation, a fellow photographer saw my body with the 70-300L lens and commented about the weight saying he had switched to Sony and used an adapter. This really got me thinking. However, even before viewing your video, I wondered about any compatibility issues. I think my questions have been answered. It's one thing to use, say a Sigma lens meant for a Canon body but another to adapt a Canon lens (or Nikon for that matter) to a Sony mirrorless. It is strongly rumored that Canon will announce a full frame mirrorless later this year so waiting seems the prudent thing. I have subscribed to your site and will wait for your tests results!
Thank you so much Caleb for the helpful video! God bless and good luck!
You’re welcome.
Thank you so so much for all time and money saver advice and information.
Try the Commlite. Its as snug and tight as the Meta but much MUCH cheaper (£59) and the autofocus is super speedy. I own a range of Canon glass and Sigma Art and all of them work VERY well.
Try that same commlite with wide angle lenses with longer exposures, you will notice how badly engineered it is - distortions at the corners are too bad. Stars are stretched towards the corners images unusable.. Many flare/ light leak issues using IR filter and probably with strong ND filter... I do not recommend commlite anymore.
You can use a SmallRig cadge.
I just buy the 24-70 mm f4 sony (tested today and huge difference) ... I used the metabones 4 with canon lenses ... worked well but ... sometimes I lost informations on the screen and even with the peaking my footages were not on focus sometimes ...
I have an a6000 with commlite adapter I was able to connect the ef-s 24mm canon autofocus super slow but I DID set the clear image zoom and works with the adapter and with a C mount lens I have probably set clear image zoom with the native lens then put the adapter? That's kind of what o did, it works for sure and I still don't own any Sony native lenses (coming soon)
So the Metabones adapter you used is just the plain adapter, not the Speedbooster, correct?
Correct. Just the simple adapter.
But which version :)?
the Mark IV. It's pretty lame. I also have both the fotodiox and metabones. I wasted my money on the metabones.
@@theblacktruth so wchich adapter now is better for canon L Lenses? Sory for my English.... 😁
I don't own any Sony lenses, but have rented some, and have always gone back to my canon glass mounted on my Sony. My biggest complaint is that I shoot in all kinds of weather, and while shooting Sony lenses that are not weather sealed I found as I went through my images while shooting sony zooms dust starting to collect on the sensor showing up in the images themselves. I do not have this issue with the Canon L lenses. I thought the days of zooms being dust vacuums were gone, and was surprised to see it show up again. This is a deal breaker for me. I can manually focus when need be. Its how we shot for decades. I can't put up with dust on the sensor though.
In good light conditions I have found the autofocus reliability to be about the same as native sony lenses. In low light I find the sony lenses will hunt, but eventually focus. With Canon on Sony low light focus is much more problematic - so I manually focus. For much of what I do, this is not an issue.
One weird side effect is that when I first started using Canon on Sony, the camera with a canon lenses in the beginning would take a little extra time to become available. I have noticed a significant reduction in the amount of time to "ready" now. Not sure what the difference is, but I am not complaining.
I agree. I prefer E mount lenses like Zeiss or G master with my a7s. I used the metabones adapter once with Nikon lenses and I realized that I prefer 100% compatibility with all the features between the camera and the lens. One cons is these lens are kind of expensive :/
Yeah, they are pricey for sure. Similar to L-Series Canon lenses. But I agree with wanting all of the features a camera can offer.
My canon lenses don’t do as well. My 16-35 2.8 has a lot of distortion that’s not as easily fixed as it was on my canon 5dmkiii. I’m using a Sony a74.
Hi Caleb. Thanks so much for posting this video. I'm in a position of starting to build my camera collection and decided to go with the A7SII. I would mostly be using this camera for stills (for fun) but want to be able to shoot corporate videos with it also. Currently I rent the C100 or C300 for those and so I'm familiar and like the Canon system and their lenses especially the 24-70 F2.8 II and the 70-200mm F2.8 II. But after much research online (haven't been able to test it myself), it seems the Metabones Mark IV despite the latest update doesn't perform reliably for auto focus in video mode which is where I would need it. So now I've got an A7SII and two brand new Canon lenses and no adaptor yet. I'm thinking of selling the two Canon lenses and buying the Sony 24-70mm f2.8 G master series and the Sony 70-200mm F4 G OSS as I can't afford the equivalent G master. Part of me thinks that somewhere down the line (hopefully not too distant) the autofocus for video will improve with another firmware update but since I'm starting from scratch, perhaps I should just invest in one system? I do prefer the colour of Canon and the "softness/warmth" of their images. Or keep the Canon lenses and continue to hire the C300 for jobs?
Very honest and wise advise. I changed my decision about metabones for now.
Finally someone explained all the shit out of this differences.
Owner of A7s with some Canon lens, moving to Sony for autofocus.
Always thought that it the lens quality that is most important. The Sony cameras are amazing, still ahead of Nikon and Canon when it comes to mirrorless but, the big problem for me is that although Sony Lenses are fantastic, they are a lot more expensive. I would worry about using adaptors purely because most reviews don't recommend them. So for me, I would probably stick with Canon or Nikon until decent adaptors are released which don't compromise a shot or its image quality.
I've had the same problems. I do love Sony mirrorless systems but all my lenses are from Canon and they provide my favorite look. While Metabones adapters are great they do compromise the system in a few small ways.
thank you for this (even 6 years later) I just got the sony a7r4 and I've been kinda bummed out because the auto focus is SOOOO bad bc i dont have sony lenses but also its probabl;y vcause idk what im doing lol
Awesome. Answered everything I was looking to find out :)
Good info about the adapted lenses. BTW, digital zoom when using the Metabones Speedbooster and Canon glass with my SONY FS5 does work. As you mention, auto focus performance is poor, but I typically focus manually whenever shooting video. Regarding the suggestion of replacing Canon glass with SONY glass, that is an expensive proposition. It comes down to what gear the photographer/videographer already owns, their workflow and future camera needs. Speaking strictly for myself, I am not keen on SONY glass, and the auto focus limitations using Canon glass on my SONY FS5 are a non-issue. Just my 2 cents, adjusted for inflation...
Thanks for chiming in Dave. That is super helpful to know. When manually focusing, the ability to digital zoom and check focus is a must for me, so I'm glad that is an option on the FS5, as I might switch over to that.
which mic are you using for this video? its amazing
Rode NTG-3
Gonna buy an a7ii second hand soon, wondering if anyone has any further comments on this as the videos 2-3 years old now? New metabones out with faster auto focus?
Yeah, there are some better options now with better firmware from what I’ve heard.
I have Canon 24-70 F4 IS and mount it to Sony A7RII with Viltrox adapter. My question is, will my Canon Stabilization works on Sony body? Thank you in advance..
I have both the Sigma MC-11 and Metabones Smart "T" IV adapters.... with the latest firmware update for the MC-11 (literally released yesterday), I'm surprised how much better the 135L is now (vs the Metabones... which also has the latest FW). Focusing is pretty good with the flexible spot pushed to the corners ("rule of 3rds" corners), where as with the Metabones, it still struggles... THAT being said, I'm referring to static subjects, I haven't tested it on tracking moving subjects (especially subjects coming towards me), but my guess is that it's still not great.
+Ken Cheng Really appreciate you chiming in. Hopefully in a year or two they get all the kinks worked out.
I think some older lenses may work better with the Sigma, vs the newer L-II lenses work and are listed under the MetabonesIV supported models.
i have question
that adapter work with sony a7rii and canon lens 50mm f1.2 ....!?
thanks you
What's the point of the expensive adapters if you are going to use manual focus anyway? High price for that Exif data...
Agree. I got Commlite adapter on Sony a7R. And autofocus is completely useless with my Canon EF 28mm f1.8. I don't know if that was the right choice I've made.. I mainly shoot static objects and places so I didn't mind manual focusing at first. But then I started to wish I had the possibility from time to time shoot my family events with my work gear.. But hey, I just don't have enough money, and to get something equal to my Canon glass I would need Zeiss... it just hurts to be poor.
+john doe Try the newest metabones IV and firmware. Other comments are saying it works great.
$399 hmmm, no thanks, I'm not going to invest more on that platform. I have a7R mark I, with a contrast AF, so I don't think Metabones will be any better when it comes to AF speed. I would prefer spend that money on the native mount E lens. As I told before, I don't think it was the right decision I've made.
If I invested 100-200 bucks more, I could have bought a native Sony or Zeiss lens, but I was naive and bought the Canon lens in hope it will work for me without emptying my wallet on Zeiss, that is on pair with the quality of Canon I bought.
Sorry guys, but it's not good at all. Some Canon lenses might work on a7rII, or a6300 but most won't anyway in a "usable" way. If you shoot stills or landscapes only, go ahead, but at the end it doesn't feel like it's a 21 century camera. More than half of AF settings doesn't work with the adapter, it's hunting and it's slow as hell. Don't rise your hopes up, like I did. It could work with three or four Canon lenses, so it might not be completely useless if you are lucky.
Sony is expensive platform, even if it doesn't seem like one. Body costs half of Canon's, but then you ALWAYS have to consider the lenses price. Then you realize the actual cost is the same as of the other brands after all.
Sorry to discourage you all, but adapters are for poor people like me, or as a last resort, if you don't want to sell your Canon lens collection (if you have one). Definitely not for a professional work. And it will NEVER replace the native lenses. My two cents from my experience:
-If you plan to buy Sony body, plus adapter and Canon lens, because you don't wan't to spend too much money = DON'T. Invest a bit more and buy a native lens!
-If you have big Canon lens collection already (but good EF ones) = okay, but consider the fact you won't use the camera in the fullest.
-If you wan't to shoot people, sports = don't even bother!
-If you wan't to shoot people, sports, AND have a big Canon lens collection = SELL Canon collection, and buy a good Zeiss lens, or two.
-If you are okay with manual focusing in many cases = okay, go for it.
Getting back to this video after Sony's A7 III release. Just totally lost my hopes that Canon would release something similar to this.
Hi! For the Metabones adapter Canon EF Adapter IV: If you transfer the camera to the Sony a7sII or other a7 series to "M" mode and press the video recording button, will the aperture jump be? Will the depth of field change? Thanks !
Many native Sony lenses are fairly expensive with a few exceptions, namely by all means exhaustive, 28mm, 55mm(second hand), 85mm f1.8, 50mm f1.8(mediocre) and a few more, eg Samyang 35mm AF...
hey what lens adaptor do you reccommend for sony a77 - i would like to get a adaptor to cannon
Do you can make a review with SIGMA MC 11 adaptor?,
Is there any sony camera adapter for canon lens that works in video mode?
Does anyone know if it makes sense to turn off image stabilization on the Canon or Sigma lenses, when shooting on Sony cameras? My understanding is that the Sony uses "in camera" stabilization (A7r3). Certainly it uses battery to have IS on. But is there any contribution to image quality?
QUESTION - I heard you mention that you've used af adapters on a7sii, I have been looking for a convertor that will work with a7sii and everything I find says the converter "Utilizes Phase-Detect Autofocus Mode" which the a7sii does not have, please let me know which adapter worked with a7sii , allowing autofocus to function. Thanks
Are there better options if I know I'll never use autofocus?
Quick question: does using canon lenses on Sony bodies give a more “softer” look for photo/video? And do you recommend using canon lenses on Sony bodies for the possible switch to canon in the future? Thanks
I also looked at the commlite adapters and seem to be very similar, but which one is better? Commlite or Fotodiox?
I'm using a Sigma 18-35mm f/1.8 on my Sony a6000 with the Sigma MC-11 adapter with great results. Next i'm gonna start using vintage lenses, FD lenses to be exact.
Chapo Guzman can u change the aperture on sony body(canon lens) using tht adapter
yes i can. there's plenty of reviews with the exact same setup i have.
You think the sigma 18-35 50-100 will do well on the a6600?
It would be nice to know if you do put a Canon lens on your Sony camera what the results are.
Nice vid, but the Sigma MC11 is by far the best adapter. I tried about 4-5 and none worked as MC11
Hi Caleb, question, I might buy an Irix 15mm t2.6 with EF mount, it's a fully manual cine lens, at some point I want to upgrade to Sony A7iv, do you think I will be able to use this lens on Sony and get most benefits out of it when using an adapter? As far as I know all the mount converters (Ef to E mount) are just adapters with electronic contacts but without additional glass in it.
Did you switch the metabones to advance mode? I feel metabones is completely run faster.
What about the os of a canon lens on a Sony body?
HI!! great video! I need to ask someone with experience because everything is a LOT of money form me right now. The thing is that I have a sony a6500 E mount camera. And Im looking to buy a Tamron 28-75 2.8 lense. The thing is that the E mount model is about $750-800 U$. While the A-mount model is bout $200. A BIG difference. So I was thinking buying an adapter, as I basically want to do videos and the autofocus doesnt do a great work while recording I dont are much about that. BUT does the quality change? Is it worst? What are my disadvantages? Sorry for the long question! :)
Any updates on the ar7ii autofocus with canon lenses? I'm considering the a7rii and wanted to be sure the autofocus would work well with my canon lenses. Have they fixed this issue? What would your suggestion be?
Have you ever tried a DLC dot line electronic lens adaptor for EF&EF-S lens to e-mount cameras, I never hear anyone talk about this adaptor. I have one for my cannon lenses to adapt to my A6000 , it works fairly well i think. I wish i knew if the MC-11 worked better or not. Until i see a review on the two I'll just keep using the dot line, i don't want to spend money on another adaptor unless i know it works better than the dot line.
I agree that native autofocus is the best - but the Sigma MC-11 ist getting very close. Also with most Canon lenses, not only canon mount Sigma lenses.
Hey Caleb, thanks for another great video! I'm currently a Canon user shooting 80% of the time video (5D MIII and a 6D) and only 20% photo.... Since I just have a couple of Canon lenses I think I might be better of selling all my canon gear and stay away from lens adapter now that I'm thinking on switching to Sony, most probably to an A7S II since I shoot wedding and other events in low-light. Now that you have plenty of experience working with Canon and Sony cameras, would you consider a no-brainer to switch from a 5D to an A7S II? Is there anything you still miss from Canon? Thanks!
Since I haven't fully made the switch to Sony yet (because we have so much Canon gear it will be really hard to sell it all + my wife and I both need a break in client work) I can't speak 100% to what I would miss, but I don't think there is much of anything.
But if you would shot manual mode, its all worth it!
Agreed, i have speed booster, also regular metabones, but i'm looking to upgrade my lenses to native sony mount. As You talked about features - i think You right and also native lenses a more compact. Maybe its related to workflow and jobs also, but i'm often in one man band and today i'm seeing that less carry is alway better ;)
I think native is almost always the best option.
what about the canon 100mm L macro with adapter ?? I've seen a lot of people choose that option over sony's native 90mm macro.
So really the only issue is AF, right? I'm looking to put Canon lenses on my A7Sii as I'll be upgrading to RED in a few years and having L lenses already would really cut my costs.
If both camera and lense do not weather sealing, ex. Sony A7iii and zeiss 16 35mm f4, then how to use it in cold or wet conditions ? Suppose while trekking in himalayas,
Is canon eos r and 16 35mm f4 a better option? Can anyone suggest?
Thanks for the great review , thanks to you I got the details clear, which I couldn't earlier even after watching tons of videos and finally decided not to buy canon lens for my Sony A6000 series
Where can I get the White Balance target shown on the video? Thanks for the info.
Did you tried the metabones Mark IV from Canon?, I read it is one of the best for adapting Canon Lenses to Sony bodies...