We could've gone deeper using the remaining 2 Whys. We could approach the team which built the software and ask them why this aspect is missing (what's their reason behind it), and then follow it up with another Why. We might get insights which can address the problem at the root.
I think this method is very limiting, and restrictive. I'm being taught this in LO, and I must use this method in part of my current project. I really hate how we need to use the exact method, when in reality the basic concept of asking questions about the problem is sufficient. In reality, the word "why" is very restricting, because "how" and "what" are often more suited. All this method is making me do is change the sentence structure of my questions, making them more clunky and stupid. Not a problem with the method, just with the way I'm being forced to apply it.
This is a potential problem with the 5-why technique. Some level of understanding of the process or problem should be available. If the correct method is followed, 5-why should be done in a team. If the problem is too complex for a 5-why then other techniques are suggested.
I love this! Thanks for this quick explanation.
Short and sweet explanation with example. Thank you.
We could've gone deeper using the remaining 2 Whys. We could approach the team which built the software and ask them why this aspect is missing (what's their reason behind it), and then follow it up with another Why. We might get insights which can address the problem at the root.
Why?
Excellent video
Very insightful👌
Excellent expaination
Very useful !! effective in solving problems
Thank you madam... Best again.
What is the diffrence between five why, Root cause and causal tree analysis ?
Grammar/Knowledge=Who/What/Where/When=Logic/Understanding=Why=Rhetoric/Wisdom=How.
I think this method is very limiting, and restrictive. I'm being taught this in LO, and I must use this method in part of my current project. I really hate how we need to use the exact method, when in reality the basic concept of asking questions about the problem is sufficient. In reality, the word "why" is very restricting, because "how" and "what" are often more suited. All this method is making me do is change the sentence structure of my questions, making them more clunky and stupid. Not a problem with the method, just with the way I'm being forced to apply it.
what if somebody doesn't have answers to those why's
This is a potential problem with the 5-why technique. Some level of understanding of the process or problem should be available. If the correct method is followed, 5-why should be done in a team. If the problem is too complex for a 5-why then other techniques are suggested.
then you keep asking questions from different sectors to reach it, eventually, u will find it....
good why the fuck I need this for LO ???
Anyone knows her name?
recur, not reoccur
Why...why...why..why..why..
.....
Why?
😘