NVivo 12 tutorial - Classifications and attributes

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 15 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 31

  • @sonjalindberg2855
    @sonjalindberg2855 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Please upload more of these helpful NVivo tutorials!!!! You explain things very well.

  • @iancrawford9661
    @iancrawford9661 6 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    This guy is good! Clear, detailed and extremely helpful insights. Very grateful.

  • @ushachawda6300
    @ushachawda6300 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you so much!! I’ve been trying to figure this out for a week!

  • @ashathomasphd983
    @ashathomasphd983 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you so much .Please upload more Nvivo tutorials . Excellent Video!!!

  • @AngelaRamonaYun
    @AngelaRamonaYun 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Why did the reference number change when you tied your files to the cases (at 1:37)?

  • @assl100
    @assl100 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Thank you for this video. One thing I am unable to work out is how to view all the data from one attribute? So if you have coded 7 people as "student" is it possible to see the data from all "students"?

  • @知渡教育
    @知渡教育 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I am using Nvivo12 Plus and I have longitudinal data. What's the best way to organize the data so I can compare data for participants at Time1 with Time 2?
    what tools can I use to analyze different time and how would I use it in Nvivo 12?

  • @phoebegray302
    @phoebegray302 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi, I have a question, please. How do I see all data under one attribute, please? Thank you for your video!

  • @goldengusoone
    @goldengusoone 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I love your teaching.

  • @anaeva5627
    @anaeva5627 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    These tutorials are great and helpful! Thanks a lot for helping me out.

  • @sumaira1234567
    @sumaira1234567 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    your tutorials are extremely helpful

  • @ethel350
    @ethel350 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you so much Bill...excellent video! What is the best way to do classification with policy documents or policy text. Thank you

  • @jedidiahobinna9843
    @jedidiahobinna9843 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    I guess this feature is most suitable for interviews and wouldnt be useful for focus group data right?

  • @nourazhari131
    @nourazhari131 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for this! So I am working with an excel that has both classifying fields and codable fields. (Nvivo 12 on MAC). I autocoded the data so that both the classifying columns and codable columns are linked to the case numbers. I am now trying to run a query on "Matric coding" to look at the intersection of two attributes from classifying columns only. However, the results in the node matrix don't seem to make sense (i.e the total is larger than what is actually present in the dataset), which makes me thing it is not doing what I'm intending to do. Would you know why that's the case? (Side note: I thought maybe it is because I am not asking it to look intersection of A "AND" B but I can't find an option to do that on Mac version of Nvivo 12.

  • @19markus61
    @19markus61 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Dear Billy, I have confronted with another question, how to select multiple options for one person within one category?

  • @julianyates406
    @julianyates406 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    The very first step does not work for me in NVivo for Mac. There is no option for new case classification. My menu just has "no classification". NVivo is becoming a real mess. So many aspects no longer work. Can't even find and replace text in the Mac version.

  • @lasselindved6805
    @lasselindved6805 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    WE STAN AN NVIVO TALENT YAAAAS SHE DID THAT

  • @19markus61
    @19markus61 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Dear Billy, thanks for your video very good demonstration. You have defined the classification parameters with all interviews uploaded. Question, how to maintain the same classification structure for new interviews uploaded later?

  • @CristinaSantos-tv7ph
    @CristinaSantos-tv7ph 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Really clear and helpful. Thank you!

  • @yiannissakkas1522
    @yiannissakkas1522 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent. Thank you very much

  • @carlaallen3811
    @carlaallen3811 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    I am doing a content analysis and would like to analyze each instance of a term as an individual case with different classifications. Right now, I am only getting the individual files with multiple references in each file for the term I am looking at. Is there a way to create a case out of the paragraph surrounding a term, instead of the whole document being the case?

    • @DrBillyWong
      @DrBillyWong  6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hi, my understanding is that cases can only be created for individual sources (and for the whole document), which means if you are really sure of wanting a paragraph to be a 'case', you might create a new source (e.g., document) for only that paragraph (and probably use a New Folder to avoid confusion). Hope that helps!

  • @haleemjamie
    @haleemjamie 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    can you give suggestion to my problem. I have collected data, where each participant has several type of documents (i.e;one participants have interview, drawings, photography). How do I put these as one case?

    • @DrBillyWong
      @DrBillyWong  6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hi there, I have this problem myself, for repeated interviews, and what I did is to use only one (the most 'prominent' file, such as the interview) as a case for the purpose of adding attributes. Alternatively, (for multiple interviews - merge together for the purpose of adding attributes only in the case) - in your scenario, you could use the 'Add to set'' option and create all related files as one 'set' - but there are limited powers/functions associated with 'sets', only to group together files for searches. Long story short, there isn't really a functional way to 'group' different flies into one case without merging them, as far as I am aware. Maybe use the QSR forum and ask them as well. Hope that helps!

    • @haleemjamie
      @haleemjamie 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@DrBillyWong thank you for your reply.. I just explored file classification where I can classify type of document.. But still hv d issue with case classification.. I'll have a go with your suggestion.. Thanks again

  • @shamalkaperera4693
    @shamalkaperera4693 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi, just one question.
    Do we need to have to all the transcripts uploaded before creating case classifications or can we add more transcripts later?

    • @DrBillyWong
      @DrBillyWong  6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You can add more transcripts later and convert them into cases. You can also add more attributes and attribute values as and when they arise.

    • @shamalkaperera4693
      @shamalkaperera4693 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks so much Billy :)

  • @LindaLampert1
    @LindaLampert1 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you.

  • @Lucky-cu1tf
    @Lucky-cu1tf 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you