It continues to amaze me how these guys (the hero of the movie) can just run out on open ground with gunfire from several sources and never get tagged. That said it is a fun action movie if you are fan of the bad getting it by lethal means.
Don’t be like me when I first got out of the army. Basically I was unable to enjoy stuff like this because of my real life experience 😂😂😂 it took awhile but I was finally able to suspend disbelief enough to watch action movies with optimism
except it wouldn't blow up... doubtful a 556 would go through quarter inch plate at that range, even if it did, there's no spark for ignition. But, it's a movie, so cool effect...
@@TheFallen1013 still, neither one of those are going to provide a spark with a nonferrous round. IAP would do it, but FMJ, JHP, or ballistic tip hunting rounds aren't going to do that.
@@kleetus92 true, I don't think there is a IAP round chambered for both calibers. I was saying it was a higher caliber than a 5.56. 5.56 round would just bounce off the tank at the range he was shooting at the time
This is a dumb yet fantastic action movie. I forgot this existed! Two guys that aren’t really gun-fighting action stars came in to make this a better film than it probably would have otherwise been. The suppressed .22 scene is up there in originality and the climactic end feels like a bonus scene; a little P.S. at the bottom of a letter. Good watch.
Worked on a set once as a sort of "stand by Network consultant" (the studio had major network problems) and was able to watch some of the filming and talk to some guys. They said most action films they actually film loads of reloading and "gun maintenance" (e.g. jamming, or feeding failures), but those scenes often get cut because they lessen the action of the scene. Bullshit if you ask me, but that's just how it is.
.........and a few minutes later in the timeline of the movie someone over at the FBI stated there was a shootout at a hideout somewhere but no bodies were found. These 2 guys killed more than 20 people but not one body was found at the scene by the time the local authorities got there.........HA HA HA HA HA HA HA
Always bugged me when he was running toward the little grassy hill in slow mo-he had a mag already in and racked back and an un-used shell came out. (Unless he was jammed).
Yes it very well could. I've done it before. It just depends if the bullet sparked or not on impact. Most likely it wouldn't. Its the spark that sets it off. I've done tests on it before; about 1 out of every 10 propane tanks would actually explode into a fireball. You can even find video's on youtube of people doing it themselves. If you use flares it would pretty much explode every single time.
I don't understand the movie implies swagger was in Marine Corps Force Recon but during the mission where his buddy was killed they were wearing the Army ACU camo pattern not the USMC MARPAT Pattern
Special forces type units don't always comply with the normal uniforms for their branch. Even today MARSOC raiders in Afghanistan wear the old woodland patterns instead of the woodland MARPAT.
ImTheWaffleman American movies Aren't allowed to have completely accurate uniforms due to several codes and laws. That's why the flag is often on the wrong shoulder, awards placed incorrectly, etc.
Within the first 3 seconds of the video 0:03 I noticed something wrong. Snipers don't close one eye. They still leave both of them open. Especially when you are running and shooting at the same time desperate to find proper cover.
Not entirely true, not entirely false. They do close one eye when shooting so as to not miss their shot. Having two different images being sent to your brain can easily cause a missed shot due to differing ranges. You keep both open until a target is acquired. You close the one you don't aim with for a more accurate shot. This isn't the same as archery or a normal rifle, these scopes are powerful, and the images being sent to the brain clash, making it much harder to focus.
@@likhitbadwal6 Was it actually? That's funny. I never noticed that. Movie mistake 🤣 Update: No it isn't. It's clearly open. Wtf lol? Unless you are talking about the other side of the scope?
@@manuelruen yes I am talking about other side of the scope. Most scopes has cover on both sides. Only specialized scope doesn't have cover because there lenes require less maintenance.
No we don't leave both eyes open. You can't get correct sight alignment or sight picture having both eyes open. You won't be very accurate either. Have you. Ever fired a gun before? Go do some research before you post dumb comments.
well i know one thing is for sure, you can't bring down a helicopter by shooting a propane tank with a remington 700 and expect it to blow up. but both memphis and swagger accomplished all that with all that stuff which they purchased from walmart
@@mcbrians.8508 Unless it's a .50 round, probably multiple, and unless it's a very reactive gas, you will not get ignition. And metal on metal usually doesn't cause even a spark, that's not how it works. The bullet quite literally has to be hot enough to cause ignition, hence why perhaps a .50 caliber round could work, where as everything else won't. Well, that and maybe an incendiary round
Even so, a ruptured tank would definitely disrupt the atmosphere around the chopper, creating a sudden updraft and equalization as well as pushing away the oxygen in the air thus suffocating the helicopter turbines, if not causing ignition in areas the engine cannot tolerate.
Something to think about here , Swagger's shot may have released the propane , the mercenaries shots may have set it off as they were in pray and spray mode . Also , anything is possible in the movies .
@@majormojo9830 yes... but i would submit that co-witnessing traditionally requires a riser with rifles (.83 for absolute or abt 1" for 1/3). Irrespective of that, given the distances, absolute co-witnessing would clutter or obstruct the value of the red dot with the front sight, and 1/3 again, would require a 1" riser and is fine I guess, but I'm going to go on a limb and say they just didn't have this debate. Which is not surprising because I feel like it is only able to be appreciated by those who appreciate firearms like yourself. Honestly your point about co-witnessing was a good one. Always a pleasure talking guns with other gun people.
@@Bird_Law_ those are some very fair points you bring up. I would say at the distance they were being used at though it doesn't matter because thats basically point blank
I once met a man, who said to me he wanted a driver. he was a hair-lip. I told him I couldn't do it. he said he would always knew where I lived. I never shared that story.I always kept that story.
Sooooo....what..this guy is DEVGRU or Delta and the PMCs they send after him are what??? The 5th string from Triple Canopy or Securitas?? Oh well..still a fun movie
I did that. Propane came out. The next one I drenched in gas, lit it and then ran back 30 feet and shot it with .223. A moderate fire ball, but of course the propane is liquid and won't explode like that. The scene was pure BS.
Everytime I shoot a propane take tank it just makes a hole and the propane leakes all out. I even tried making a fire next to it and it just burned the leaking propane. How does hollywood do it?
Need to ignite the gas on the inside, pressure blows the tank. An incendiary round could possibly work, but otherwise, they just light it from the inside.
Interesting filming but loses a sense of realism. In addition to the "endless 30 round magazines" someone noticed! It's hard to believe that a rifle could ignite a propane tank. Even with incendiary rounds. The rush of escaping, extremely C-O-L-D propane gas would have most certainly blown out the flame.
yep he's shooting wrong you should never shoot with your non dominant eye fully closed I shoot guns competitively so I know and I have gone to 5 national competitions so I am not bad either
nod-nod. People who look through microscopes know the same trick. Squinting like that distorts the eyeballs. Pros just learn to ignore the eye not looking through the eyepiece. It's not hard, I've done it, and I'm far from a pro.
They do if theres a spark. Incendiaries make a lot of sparks. Watch iraqveteran8888 shoot propane tanks with a .50 cal and youll know what Im talking about.
![[ ออกกอง ] วัยหนุ่ม 2544 โลกหลังลูกกรง..ทัวร์กองถ่ายหนังใน "คุกของจริง" | JUSTดูIT.](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/vB--aOkZCpw/mqdefault.jpg)
It continues to amaze me how these guys (the hero of the movie) can just run out on open ground with gunfire from several sources and never get tagged. That said it is a fun action movie if you are fan of the bad getting it by lethal means.
It's hard to hit a moving target. Period. But ya.
However, reading Sun Tzu art of war, he knew his enemy, the enemy didn't know him
Don’t be like me when I first got out of the army. Basically I was unable to enjoy stuff like this because of my real life experience 😂😂😂 it took awhile but I was finally able to suspend disbelief enough to watch action movies with optimism
@@MusicAsWeMakeItexactly a moving Target while you're also in a moving helicopter.
That's Bob Lee Swagger. Bob the Nailer. He's a superhero. The books are awesome 👌
That propane tank idea was awesome.
Yeah, these tanks come handy. Similar scene in one of the Bourne movies (not to take chopper down, but to distract attention).
@@achim8239 hes playing a marine, he adapted like they do.
@@achim8239 introduce a little anarchy.
“That still only counts as one”
"Come on man.Even John wick reloads his guns"
“He always does.”
Actually John reload every time the mag is empty. The number of shots is always perfect before he reloads.
This was yeeeeeears before Hollywood has started to trend toward reality.
@@Srparisher the trend started with Saving Private Ryan, so no, you're wrong.
@@Lorrdd SPR was released in 97. Every 200X action movie would disagree with you.
A much cleaner version of the old "the smoking chopper erratically flies behind the hill/mountain before exploding" gag.
November 4, 2019
I'm just now hearing about this movie. It needs more exposure.. 12 years later.
why? It's just another unoriginal all powerful ex military/agent getting hunted by conspirasists. There are hundreds of these movies
May 4, 2020
Just now figured out about this movie.. even though I feel like I’ve seen it before.
no way you honestly think that about this piece of garbage
I watched it back in 2013 when I was in 9th grade
Gotta admit shooting the gas tank when the chopper was over it was pretty damn smart
except it wouldn't blow up... doubtful a 556 would go through quarter inch plate at that range, even if it did, there's no spark for ignition.
But, it's a movie, so cool effect...
@@kleetus92 he was using a Remington 700 chambered in 7.62x51mm ( 308) or chambered in 30-06
@@TheFallen1013 still, neither one of those are going to provide a spark with a nonferrous round. IAP would do it, but FMJ, JHP, or ballistic tip hunting rounds aren't going to do that.
@@kleetus92 true, I don't think there is a IAP round chambered for both calibers. I was saying it was a higher caliber than a 5.56. 5.56 round would just bounce off the tank at the range he was shooting at the time
@@TheFallen1013 Ah understood. I know they exist for 7.62
This whole scene is the highlight of the movie
Swagger: 2
Helicopter(s): 0
+Ben Geiger Swagger: 4
This is a dumb yet fantastic action movie. I forgot this existed! Two guys that aren’t really gun-fighting action stars came in to make this a better film than it probably would have otherwise been. The suppressed .22 scene is up there in originality and the climactic end feels like a bonus scene; a little P.S. at the bottom of a letter. Good watch.
and thats how Boblee earned a flyswatter badge kids.
He’s hacking, that wasn’t a red barrel.
Always that moment when you see a red barrel, you know it explodes;
But you see a gas tank, it’s 50 50, you try, and you’re standing way too close
The shooters on the helicopter graduated from the Imperial Academy, top of Storm Trooper sniper class.
hollywood at it again with the endless 30 round magazines.
Alex lmao I was gonna say that
Worked on a set once as a sort of "stand by Network consultant" (the studio had major network problems) and was able to watch some of the filming and talk to some guys. They said most action films they actually film loads of reloading and "gun maintenance" (e.g. jamming, or feeding failures), but those scenes often get cut because they lessen the action of the scene. Bullshit if you ask me, but that's just how it is.
.........and a few minutes later in the timeline of the movie someone over at the FBI stated there was a shootout at a hideout somewhere but no bodies were found.
These 2 guys killed more than 20 people but not one body was found at the scene by the time the local authorities got there.........HA HA HA HA HA HA HA
It had been worse if the Bayman had directed it.
ikr...
No, Bobby. Keep both eyes open when using the Aimpoint.
1:28 is like game final boss fight with helicopter 🚁
ironically, or coincidentally...a fly landed on my screen right when this video loaded up...
1:28
Now that's how you **roast** the bird!!!
Always bugged me when he was running toward the little grassy hill in slow mo-he had a mag already in and racked back and an un-used shell came out. (Unless he was jammed).
Ben Geiger it was probably a jam
Id say it was just a dud round had it happen a few times in combat that stuff happens
Where did you even see that in this video?
Funny scene when the flame reached the helicopter 🤣🤣🤣
Soldiers fight each other cuz someone 's greed ? That sad though .....
They actually have a cleaning solution for those weapons so they dull it ,when sun shines it won't glisten,you gotta have the right scope....
Damn those mini guns they never hit anyone!
I really hate when war movies use auto fire mode. Nobody would ever use that in a combat situation, especially at long range.
People in nearby Lynchburg, VA: "Wonder what all that gunfire and splosions were."
The book on which this was based is way better. Read it to fill in the details missed by the movie.
Almost as a good a helicopter takeout as John McLane's in the 4th Die Hard. Almost.
There goes the Funky Bunch.
A propane tank wouldn't explode if you shot it, liquid propane is not flammable without the correct air to gas mixture.
Yes it very well could. I've done it before. It just depends if the bullet sparked or not on impact. Most likely it wouldn't. Its the spark that sets it off. I've done tests on it before; about 1 out of every 10 propane tanks would actually explode into a fireball. You can even find video's on youtube of people doing it themselves. If you use flares it would pretty much explode every single time.
1:58 rip KB
I think the pilot may have been okay...
Gun sounds are the same from Act Of Valor.
imagine what you can see through that scope with the default front sight sticking that high
Why is he leaning off the corner while they're shooting at him? Is he suicidal?
No he is Hollywood special ops
THERES NO SPALLING IN MOVIES!!!!! SHHHHHHH
The camera shooting him is way more important than the plot shooting at him.
I don't understand the movie implies swagger was in Marine Corps Force Recon but during the mission where his buddy was killed they were wearing the Army ACU camo pattern not the USMC MARPAT Pattern
Special forces type units don't always comply with the normal uniforms for their branch. Even today MARSOC raiders in Afghanistan wear the old woodland patterns instead of the woodland MARPAT.
ImTheWaffleman American movies Aren't allowed to have completely accurate uniforms due to several codes and laws.
That's why the flag is often on the wrong shoulder, awards placed incorrectly, etc.
Maybe no one outside of army uniform geeks gives a fuck.
It's a feckin film. That's why
Movie mistakes and oversite that's all
Tell me movie name🙏🙏
OUR MARINES IN ACTION.....NUF SAID!!!!!!!!
I can only state that way less than half of Marines are capable like this
@@Jknives what the hell you mean????
@@knightrider3766 what part did you NOT understand
This film perfectly illustrates how good men die for elitist theology.
Scene fantastiche!
Duo vs Squad
Plz upload this movie in hindi
Within the first 3 seconds of the video 0:03 I noticed something wrong. Snipers don't close one eye. They still leave both of them open. Especially when you are running and shooting at the same time desperate to find proper cover.
Not entirely true, not entirely false. They do close one eye when shooting so as to not miss their shot. Having two different images being sent to your brain can easily cause a missed shot due to differing ranges. You keep both open until a target is acquired. You close the one you don't aim with for a more accurate shot. This isn't the same as archery or a normal rifle, these scopes are powerful, and the images being sent to the brain clash, making it much harder to focus.
His lens cover is closed, I don't think it would matter if he see from one eye to two.
@@likhitbadwal6 Was it actually? That's funny. I never noticed that. Movie mistake 🤣
Update: No it isn't. It's clearly open. Wtf lol? Unless you are talking about the other side of the scope?
@@manuelruen yes I am talking about other side of the scope. Most scopes has cover on both sides. Only specialized scope doesn't have cover because there lenes require less maintenance.
@@likhitbadwal6 Ah OK. Well you good eye. Nice catch lol
Best movie ever made
Amazing what equipment 200 dollar on Wal Mart can provide..
Just another day in fatal fields
Andrew Mitchell lmao
not sure it matters to the plot, but those are remngton 700's but those are Not Unertl scopes or USO MST-100's
No we don't leave both eyes open. You can't get correct sight alignment or sight picture having both eyes open. You won't be very accurate either. Have you. Ever fired a gun before? Go do some research before you post dumb comments.
Closing one eye is for shooting paper. On a two way range always keep both eyes open. If you can't shoot properly either way, you don't shoot enough.
Sooooo many critics.... This is movie. Just enjoy. eye this, gun that, run this hide that blah" blah".
Unlimited ammo and god mode from fallout 3 and New Vegas.
You wont survive a sec in openfield.. in a paintball battle lol 😂 much less a shootout with elite troops
The American Way.
Find something bigger to duck and hide until the war is over. LOL
BOB
He's shooting left handed...
Duo vs squad
Welcome to Pubg
did you got shot in the army? no, i was shot in the leggy.
I mean the horrible shots by the soldiers and a napalm bomb. That was just a tad over the top.
Achievement Complete
the one thing that bugs me is when he is firing the m4 that he closed his right eye they alwalys leave both eye open
Reminds me of the Texas heli hog hunt... but this time the hogs are armed themselves🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️
Lol
WATER
From when do Swat teams use RPD-s?
I think they’re military contractors. They can use whatever they’d like, theoretically
PACKS
why does that gas tank burn like gasoline
well i know one thing is for sure, you can't bring down a helicopter by shooting a propane tank with a remington 700 and expect it to blow up. but both memphis and swagger accomplished all that with all that stuff which they purchased from walmart
metal colliding with metal sure does create an ignition
@@mcbrians.8508 yes but in ballistics testing ignition almost never happens
@@mcbrians.8508 Unless it's a .50 round, probably multiple, and unless it's a very reactive gas, you will not get ignition. And metal on metal usually doesn't cause even a spark, that's not how it works.
The bullet quite literally has to be hot enough to cause ignition, hence why perhaps a .50 caliber round could work, where as everything else won't. Well, that and maybe an incendiary round
Even so, a ruptured tank would definitely disrupt the atmosphere around the chopper, creating a sudden updraft and equalization as well as pushing away the oxygen in the air thus suffocating the helicopter turbines, if not causing ignition in areas the engine cannot tolerate.
Something to think about here , Swagger's shot may have released the propane , the mercenaries shots may have set it off as they were in pray and spray mode . Also , anything is possible in the movies .
directed by michael bay?
Directed by:Antoine Fuqua
So Black Michael Bay then. lol
Tbf though, Fuqua makes damn good action movies.
No one thought... hey if we are going to have a fixed forward sight should we get a riser for this red dot, or at least chose a different rifle??
Ever heard of cowitness?
@@majormojo9830 yes... but i would submit that co-witnessing traditionally requires a riser with rifles (.83 for absolute or abt 1" for 1/3). Irrespective of that, given the distances, absolute co-witnessing would clutter or obstruct the value of the red dot with the front sight, and 1/3 again, would require a 1" riser and is fine I guess, but I'm going to go on a limb and say they just didn't have this debate. Which is not surprising because I feel like it is only able to be appreciated by those who appreciate firearms like yourself. Honestly your point about co-witnessing was a good one. Always a pleasure talking guns with other gun people.
@@Bird_Law_ those are some very fair points you bring up. I would say at the distance they were being used at though it doesn't matter because thats basically point blank
I once met a man, who said to me he wanted a driver. he was a hair-lip. I told him I couldn't do it. he said he would always knew where I lived. I never shared that story.I always kept that story.
Got aim like swagger can drive like Jason statham and mash gyal like Curtis Jackson....
Dude don't close your eye when you look down the scope. Stop squinting bro
You really ought to read the book.If they would have just followed it.
What book?
Point of impact
@@AssassinEmbers oh ok, thx
Your welcome
Like seriously!!!!!
I cant find this soundtrack
Bf4
*wHaT ThEy NeEd Is AiMbOt IrL* 👌
Did no notice the m4 morph into an m24 sniper rifle
Sooooo....what..this guy is DEVGRU or Delta and the PMCs they send after him are what??? The 5th string from Triple Canopy or Securitas?? Oh well..still a fun movie
Brillianto`
SALT
Unlimited ammo hacks
What is come part 2 shooter
Has anybody shot a propane tank!? Trust me..it doesn't work like that!!
I did that. Propane came out. The next one I drenched in gas, lit it and then ran back 30 feet and shot it with .223. A moderate fire ball, but of course the propane is liquid and won't explode like that. The scene was pure BS.
He was like 35 here
Apa cuma gua di sini komen bahasa indonesia??
Plss tell me name of movie?
Shooter (2007)
So, the agency is hiring imperial storm troopers now? Or are they providing the firearms training?
soooo many unrealistic things in this movie
At 1:32 I like hearing them die
they deserve it and more after enjoying their Eritrean genocide years ago..
Everytime I shoot a propane take tank it just makes a hole and the propane leakes all out. I even tried making a fire next to it and it just burned the leaking propane. How does hollywood do it?
Need to ignite the gas on the inside, pressure blows the tank. An incendiary round could possibly work, but otherwise, they just light it from the inside.
Virginia is for lovers...
Not helicopters
Lee Harvey Oswald's true story!
That chopper gunner sucks...
Interesting filming but loses a sense of realism. In addition to the "endless 30 round magazines" someone noticed!
It's hard to believe that a rifle could ignite a propane tank. Even with incendiary rounds.
The rush of escaping, extremely C-O-L-D propane gas would have most certainly blown out the flame.
Mile 22 was better
This is just the final penthouse mission
yep he's shooting wrong you should never shoot with your non dominant eye fully closed I shoot guns competitively so I know and I have gone to 5 national competitions so I am not bad either
+Hogan Bowen movies dont take it so seriously, but they should.
nod-nod. People who look through microscopes know the same trick. Squinting like that distorts the eyeballs. Pros just learn to ignore the eye not looking through the eyepiece. It's not hard, I've done it, and I'm far from a pro.
Who the hell let him hold is rifle by the magazine?
I've seen Soldiers and Marines do it sometimes so it does happen occasionally.
Lol! 🤣
listen to all the tryhard Chris kyle wannabe's in here being experts
Why are the fbi using RPDS
Those are mercs
What does RPDS stand for?
This movie had nice action scenes, too bad it was a complete cringefest in almost every other regard.
Gas tanks don't explode when shot
they do when you shoot them with incendiary rounds
Nope - not even with incendiaries - been demonstrated many times.
They do if theres a spark. Incendiaries make a lot of sparks. Watch iraqveteran8888 shoot propane tanks with a .50 cal and youll know what Im talking about.
You mean this: th-cam.com/video/57nmiaplP1Q/w-d-xo.html
Just proves my point.
Sniper ammo can go though just about anything