@@aejerthegreat ive seen a lot of car youtubers say it just fine and not be in any trouble, i assume if you're just saying it willy nilly they'll flag ya, but in context you should be fine
"coque" is french for "case" or "shell", so it just makes banning people who said monocoque without context much stupider, as it does not contain any vulgarity between the 2 initial words :/
There's an (in)famous video from the IIHS where they crash a 1959 Chevy Bel-Air into its then modern counterpart, a 2009 Malibu, as a way to demonstrate how car automobile safety had come since 1959. While both cars were absolutely _destroyed_, the '59 Bel-Air was absolutely worse off, because it wasn't designed to absorb impacts. The Malibu looked worse off, but because it's designed to crumple in on itself to absorb energy, the occupants would have survived in the Malibu, not the Bel-Air.
Even after understanding how crumple zones work, a part of me feels like crashing an old car would have me crushed against the body because of its rigidity and crashing a new car would mean the crumple zones would be crushed and the whole thing folds in on me,crushing me.
@@lapiswolf2780 well, you would get a nasty concussion (or worse) from smacking into the steering wheel, even on the rare airbag equipped vintage car, the effect is not great
I didn't even think of this, that's actually a super interesting thing though, how they split. Using Beam to explain actual car stuff, it's super cool. It also works really well, just on the physics side of things!
To stop the shaking on the replay in beamng, you should record the replay in slow motion, then play it at normal speed when doing the camera tools. 8x slower speed should do fine :)
Yeah, I did 8x slow mo when recording and had the no compression mode on for the replay, was kind of confused myself when I saw it was shaking, perhaps for the speed of the crash I should have gone with 16x or 32x slow motion instead.
This is the first time I’ve seen somebody use Beamg that doesn’t look like some random 15-year-old messing around and their computer. It actually looks professional.
No matter how elegantly you explain this, there's always gonna be that one boomer who would still say "they don't make cars like they used to" even though it's seemingly made "less durable" nowadays specifically to save the driver and passengers' lives.
Pedestrian safety is the sole reason for why new cars get the reputation for being “weaker”. Their panels are weaker on a surface level because the exact same boomers who complain keep running over people.
There is something to be appreciated in older vehicles with their ruggedness and simplicity when you do *all* the work your car will ever need by yourself. I think most people that say something like that are thinking in terms of working on the car and having it survive trivial things, like a 10mph bump, as opposed to thinking their 67 Camaro will protect them at all in a 70mph collision. I don't think most people have faith in *any* car from *any* era at those speeds, even though many new cars are life saving for all but the most extreme crashes.
@@ProbablyNotAChickenThere are definitely good and bad aspects to both new and old cars. Neither may be superior, but both have qualities we would want in an ideal car
designed to split in half so if the car catches fire, the engine will detach same story with trees, if a tree is hit, the car wont wrap around it, but instead split in half
Just for contects it's tensile strength what's measured which is basically pulling and pushing force the engineers know this but and other type of force applied besides that carbon fibre just breaks cus it's basically brittle if you want help for other types of forces you basically use fibreglass and basically most early monocoques were just carbon fibre but now a days it's all mixed and it's like a middle layer cus of cosmetics.
This also allows the companies to make much more money, as there is basically NO chance of repairing the thing. How convenient! lol I don't buy into this.
Pretend i said something funny
LMAOOOO
Lol nice joke bro
LLOOOOOLLLLLLLLLL
goofy ahh
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
TH-cam doesn't have a problem with monocoque, just dont separate mono and..... yeah
TH-cam is broken
-linux user
@@aejerthegreat ive seen a lot of car youtubers say it just fine and not be in any trouble, i assume if you're just saying it willy nilly they'll flag ya, but in context you should be fine
"coque" is french for "case" or "shell", so it just makes banning people who said monocoque without context much stupider, as it does not contain any vulgarity between the 2 initial words :/
@@DaciaSandero_1.5DCi can be taken as "cock"
It's more of a an auto filter concern than them getting blazed over it in normal context.
There's an (in)famous video from the IIHS where they crash a 1959 Chevy Bel-Air into its then modern counterpart, a 2009 Malibu, as a way to demonstrate how car automobile safety had come since 1959. While both cars were absolutely _destroyed_, the '59 Bel-Air was absolutely worse off, because it wasn't designed to absorb impacts. The Malibu looked worse off, but because it's designed to crumple in on itself to absorb energy, the occupants would have survived in the Malibu, not the Bel-Air.
I've seen that. It was very neat to watch.
Even after understanding how crumple zones work, a part of me feels like crashing an old car would have me crushed against the body because of its rigidity and crashing a new car would mean the crumple zones would be crushed and the whole thing folds in on me,crushing me.
@@lapiswolf2780 well, you would get a nasty concussion (or worse) from smacking into the steering wheel, even on the rare airbag equipped vintage car, the effect is not great
"tHeY dOnT mAkE tHeM LiKe tHey UsEd tO"
he is a future car explanation youtuber!
not only beam videos
You again...
"From Henry Ford to Enzo Ferrari"
Bro really forgot Gottlieb Daimler.
Great video nonetheless!
I didn't even think of this, that's actually a super interesting thing though, how they split. Using Beam to explain actual car stuff, it's super cool. It also works really well, just on the physics side of things!
nobody is talking about how beautiful that intro was
Small channel, amazing videos? Im excited, cant wait to see what you make next!
Nice video man! Real smooth kepp up the great work bio!
nice video, answered a question ive had for a while
damn, i absolutely love your uhh... filming style! nice vid as always
thats a top tier quality video my man, well done!
the fact that beamng can be used as a demonstration to give information about real world cars is just amazing.
these videos are amazing. the edits are incredible
what an informative video, well done and I hope more people see your quality content.
I don’t understand crumple zones. The passengers would work just as well as a crumple zone since they’re not as hard as metal
To stop the shaking on the replay in beamng, you should record the replay in slow motion, then play it at normal speed when doing the camera tools. 8x slower speed should do fine :)
Yeah, I did 8x slow mo when recording and had the no compression mode on for the replay, was kind of confused myself when I saw it was shaking, perhaps for the speed of the crash I should have gone with 16x or 32x slow motion instead.
@@BioBoyo Hmm, that's odd. I never knew about the no compression mode. I hope the replays tool will be more polished in the next update.
Hi nice video didn’t know why they split in half
The Roman Grosjean f1 crash is a good example of why the car split in half too
Great video!
This is the first time I’ve seen somebody use Beamg that doesn’t look like some random 15-year-old messing around and their computer. It actually looks professional.
Incredible video!
No matter how elegantly you explain this, there's always gonna be that one boomer who would still say "they don't make cars like they used to" even though it's seemingly made "less durable" nowadays specifically to save the driver and passengers' lives.
Pedestrian safety is the sole reason for why new cars get the reputation for being “weaker”. Their panels are weaker on a surface level because the exact same boomers who complain keep running over people.
There is something to be appreciated in older vehicles with their ruggedness and simplicity when you do *all* the work your car will ever need by yourself. I think most people that say something like that are thinking in terms of working on the car and having it survive trivial things, like a 10mph bump, as opposed to thinking their 67 Camaro will protect them at all in a 70mph collision. I don't think most people have faith in *any* car from *any* era at those speeds, even though many new cars are life saving for all but the most extreme crashes.
@@ProbablyNotAChickenThere are definitely good and bad aspects to both new and old cars. Neither may be superior, but both have qualities we would want in an ideal car
they dont make cars like they used to
These new beamng channels popping out of nowhere. Much prefer this than the short form beamng content
designed to split in half so if the car catches fire, the engine will detach
same story with trees, if a tree is hit, the car wont wrap around it, but instead split in half
bro has dark mode on map 💀💀💀
cameraman never dies
every supercar splits in two, even in real life, supercars have split into two before.
well yes, he showed examples of real life splits..
i saw the murci split and my brain fucking broke.
Nah he did not just say that 2:05
This is the start of having ejection seats for cars
ejecto seato cuz
If you can extend this video to 10min and keep this quality up, there's no doubt you'll have a massive channel in at most a year.
Ah yes a saftey design of course
Long story short, supercars have their engines in the back and split in the middle to prevent them from detonating or burning people in a collision.
Just for contects it's tensile strength what's measured which is basically pulling and pushing force the engineers know this but and other type of force applied besides that carbon fibre just breaks cus it's basically brittle if you want help for other types of forces you basically use fibreglass and basically most early monocoques were just carbon fibre but now a days it's all mixed and it's like a middle layer cus of cosmetics.
The spillting isnt for safety, its the car doing mitosis.
Didn't really think about this too hard, just assumed it was for a safety reason.
Let's not forget the famous Ferrari crash involved the infamous Gizmondo exec who later got busted for being involved with the Swedish Mafia
Could do a video on the mesh stretching glitch when u destroy your car??
Check out my far lands video!
The way he says monocoque really irritates me lmao
me too 😭
hahahahha, kidding aside great explanation though. Wild even Beamng can demonstrate that @@BioBoyo
fresh comments
Is it to Delete the most amount of Force in the crash
I like how your car engine still drive even it splitting (beamng)
Remember to press CTRL + Shift + T
Hey now
@@BioBoyoYou’re an all-star
Scintilla barely looks damage probably is the safest among the other cars you crashed to that pole! 3:50
Idk man
same here
This allows the companies to make much more money, as there is basically NO chance of repairing the thing. How convenient! lol I don't buy into this.
Ocean gate reference
Pretty sure that is how to replace batteries when you don't have a wrench or ADD
video is fine and all but what is this background music........
Very Interesting ❤ Amazing ❤
The bolide splits into 3
Bro did rs6💀
the oceangate reference is insane
fr💀
AUDI RS6 CRASH AT INTRO
That was a Mclaren :/
@@zoonibutt9334 ha
Non super cars can split in two too like tofas kartal (a old turkish car)
Because those cars have a rear sub frame
Search up RS6 - Kerosene
Not a supercar
@@satsumagt5284 sports car same thing
@@FregthyfroggoIt doesn't have a carbon fibre monocoque, but rather, a steel unibody. It's a sports version of the A6 Avant, and nothing else.
@@satsumagt5284 e
imma have to invest in this at 1.2k views and 297 likes
Hi
Hello
i crashed a supercar and that is true
audi rs6
but its also because they did the model incorrectly...
15h ago
because when you crash if engine explodes the driver is safe coz he is on other half
@doggothehedgehog maybe
This also allows the companies to make much more money, as there is basically NO chance of repairing the thing. How convenient! lol I don't buy into this.
that what i was thinking as the entire point of the car industry is profit and will only care about your safety if they know you can buy another one.
even if it didn't split in 2 it would be a total loss anyway.
Splitable covet mod