Clarification of my comments on the final example above, from BnF arabe 326a: Despite my acknowledgement of the possibility, I do not think this particular correction was done near the time of production. It does not look like a very old correction; in fact, to me it looks possibly much more recent. Thanks! DB
@Constanze Constantia I doubt that manuscripts would have been corrected while in the care of modern museums or libraries. But, occasionally I've noted corrections that look like they were made with a more modern pen. This one was made with a chisel-tipped writing pen, but its features do not in my opinion place it near the time of production.
@@SaintOtter Yes. It is a question often asked. To my knowledge there is no way yet. And, even if/when there is eventually a way, it will only be for dating inks that contain organic material. But, the problem at the moment is that radiocarbon dating is destructive and requires a larger volume of material than can be gained by a small scraping of ink. Maybe in the future!
@@variantquran4505 you are doing great job. Your videos are amazingly educational and informative. Pls no read out comments, unnecessary prolong videos will make others ignore it.
@@orioner5299 LOL - show me where does allah say that he revealed quran to messenger mohammed (word for word from quran only) - who wrote quran ??? and why is allah saying shahada suray 3:18? why does allah need human help at all suray 47:7 ?? why does allah allow wife beating suray 4:34? why did allah give permission to unalive an innocent boy based on allahs fear reason suray 18:74 +18:80 ..... Why
@@orioner5299 show full / complete method of salah incl.rakah from quran - quran is complete n in detail suray 6:114 - so answer my question from quran without tafseer`suray 25:33 quran is in best tafsser .
With respect to Q.33:73 it seems to me that if you add words to a line of poetry, that you will change the metre of the verse. Do you find that this addition (and others like it) will fix or damage the rhythm of the Arabic? Q.7:44 reminded me of some guy I read a while back, he noticed that with a handful of exceptions that the Meccan Suras did not use the word "Allah" but "Rabbi/Lord." He surmised that where these verses had the word "Allah" that it was added at a later date. Q7 & Q34 are both Meccan Suras.
Historically there was variant Quran even if we have no manuscripts to show: the variant Quran of Ibn Masood. If after the standardisation of the Uthmanic text everyone forgot all variant Qurans then why was it spotted, 300 years later after Ibn Masood, and documented by ibn Nadim in his book Fihrist? Here is a hadith proving there was a variant Quran th-cam.com/video/oJR7AkWHr7A/w-d-xo.html and th-cam.com/video/5f8yH50wS2o/w-d-xo.html
@praedicator veritatis. Could you translate David wood lastest video about Quran not preserved and ofc this channel to bahasa Indonesia, please? It would help to stop the ignorance of Muslim Indonesia
Show Indonesia this. Here Muhammad's companion Ibn Masud is telling us that the last 2 chapters are not part of the Quran th-cam.com/video/IvVUwApQjKY/w-d-xo.html
Asalaam alaikum! It is great to see Afghan believers! I pray for the underground church there, that the Holy Spirit will continue to gather all the sheep and bless Afghanistan with the peace and joy of Christ.
Historically there was variant Quran even if we have no manuscripts to show: the variant Quran of Ibn Masood. If after the standardisation of the Uthmanic text everyone forgot all variant Qurans then why was it spotted, 300 years later after Ibn Masood, and documented by ibn Nadim in his book Fihrist? Here is a hadith proving there was a variant Quran th-cam.com/video/oJR7AkWHr7A/w-d-xo.html and th-cam.com/video/5f8yH50wS2o/w-d-xo.html
For most Muslims in Indonesia, they have never read the history of the Quran, they only hear from the Ustadz and think that this book is original, revealed, has not been altered and has been preserved by Allah ... moreover, the biggest problem is that most of them do not know the Arabic script and language.
Historically there was variant Quran even if we have no manuscripts to show: the variant Quran of Ibn Masood. If after the standardisation of the Uthmanic text everyone forgot all variant Qurans then why was it spotted, 300 years later after Ibn Masood, and documented by ibn Nadim in his book Fihrist? Here is a hadith proving there was a variant Quran th-cam.com/video/oJR7AkWHr7A/w-d-xo.html and th-cam.com/video/5f8yH50wS2o/w-d-xo.html
@Testament Faith cheap discounted god believe in 1 & Get 2 Free // i m defender of Islam But our topic is ur False Doctrine of 3nty which will Cast u to hell 4 eternity see my chnl as i respond to sam sahmoun abt Oneness in Quran
Historically there was variant Quran even if we have no manuscripts to show: the variant Quran of Ibn Masood. If after the standardisation of the Uthmanic text everyone forgot all variant Qurans then why was it spotted, 300 years later after Ibn Masood, and documented by ibn Nadim in his book Fihrist? Here is a hadith proving there was a variant Quran th-cam.com/video/oJR7AkWHr7A/w-d-xo.html and th-cam.com/video/5f8yH50wS2o/w-d-xo.html
his words are full of lies and misinformation, he identify things that are not true and you talk about the Quran as if he is researching it, search carefully and do not deceive Christians with your lies, and the amazing thing is that you did not talk about the Bible and the thousands of errors and contradictions in it, I advise you to search more about the Quran and The Bible and do not be fooled by the words of this hateer of Muslims, search for more reliable sources, if you are looking for the truth
@Zack Smith I don't know if you have seen his latest video but he has found 5 manuscripts with the same correction in it. This will be the end of the matter. No more manuscripts produced by Muslim apologists to counter it this time. Just wait and see - it will be his next video
@@Yuki.2022 Are they the ones who told Yasir Qadhi to say the standard narrative has Holes in it. Please practice your Taqquire elsewhere. It won't work here. The God of this platform is not the best of deceiver. Please don't be offended. Jesus love you. 😊
He states that in Surah 33:9, the word "الله" was added in NLR Marcel 11 (dated to?) The word "الله" was already present in other earlier dated manuscripts such as the Tübingen Fragments, Codex Is. 1615I and other manuscripts. Hence, the omission is accidental. (4) t.co/KBIzLUE6P6
he got exposed by Farid in this 300 pages refutation :) www.academia.edu/44414539/The_Insignificance_of_Corrections_in_Early_Qur%C4%81n_Manuscripts_a_response_to_Daniel_Alan_Brubaker
Four examples of corrections to the 'errorless' Quran manuscripts in just one short video and that is just scratching the surface. Thank you for this information.Looking forward to seeing your response to Shabir Ally.
@@moe8686 Historically there was variant Quran even if we have no manuscripts to show: the variant Quran of Ibn Masood. If after the standardisation of the Uthmanic text everyone forgot all variant Qurans then why was it spotted, 300 years later after Ibn Masood, and documented by ibn Nadim in his book Fihrist? Here is a hadith proving there was a variant Quran th-cam.com/video/oJR7AkWHr7A/w-d-xo.html and th-cam.com/video/5f8yH50wS2o/w-d-xo.html
Historically there was variant Quran even if we have no manuscripts to show: the variant Quran of Ibn Masood. If after the standardisation of the Uthmanic text everyone forgot all variant Qurans then why was it spotted, 300 years later after Ibn Masood, and documented by ibn Nadim in his book Fihrist? Here is a hadith proving there was a variant Quran th-cam.com/video/oJR7AkWHr7A/w-d-xo.html and th-cam.com/video/5f8yH50wS2o/w-d-xo.html
his words are full of lies and misinformation, he identify things that are not true and you talk about the Quran as if he is researching it, search carefully and do not deceive Christians with your lies, and the amazing thing is that you did not talk about the Bible and the thousands of errors and contradictions in it, I advise you to search more about the Quran and The Bible and do not be fooled by the words of this hateer of Muslims, search for more reliable sources, if you are looking for the truth
@@marcelmeuldijk The muslim claim is that the quran we have today is preserved word for word and goes back to Othmanic Mushaf and the prophet.... Is this claime false? NO...!!!! And this claim is atested by non muslim leading scholars. Can we find qurans with error? sure we can....
Very interesting in an age where apologetics is purely about backbiting eachother your channel brings a fresh of new air with pure education. Thankful and God bless you
Historically there was variant Quran even if we have no manuscripts to show: the variant Quran of Ibn Masood. If after the standardisation of the Uthmanic text everyone forgot all variant Qurans then why was it spotted, 300 years later after Ibn Masood, and documented by ibn Nadim in his book Fihrist? Here is a hadith proving there was a variant Quran th-cam.com/video/oJR7AkWHr7A/w-d-xo.html and th-cam.com/video/5f8yH50wS2o/w-d-xo.html
his words are full of lies and misinformation, he identify things that are not true and you talk about the Quran as if he is researching it, search carefully and do not deceive Christians with your lies, and the amazing thing is that you did not talk about the Bible and the thousands of errors and contradictions in it, I advise you to search more about the Quran and The Bible and do not be fooled by the words of this hateer of Muslims, search for more reliable sources, if you are looking for the truth
@@dailyrecipeshandbook9349 yea , the Buble doesn't need to be perfectly preserved , but we still got the percfet word of God(Jesus). And also , the number of Quranic manuscript doesn't even come close to the Bible....and there is no variants in the essential doctrine(John 1:1 and Mark 14:62) , and also Dr.Dan have no intention of hating on Muslim , if you actually read his book you would know
@@moe8686 It will be all over in October 2020 when Ibn Mujahid and his 7 ahruf will be exposed by Shady Nasser's new book www.amazon.co.uk/dp/9004401970/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_apa_i_IH-xFbXCA5AXR Hiding the variants of the Quran behind the 7 ahruf will come to an end
He states that in Surah 33:9, the word "الله" was added in NLR Marcel 11 (dated to?) The word "الله" was already present in other earlier dated manuscripts such as the Tübingen Fragments, Codex Is. 1615I and other manuscripts. Hence, the omission is accidental. (4) t.co/KBIzLUE6P6
@@inquisitivemind007 and all the fake allegations on Quran is answer by dr Shazad Saleem in 2016 by his book HISTORY of Quran it's hydrogen bomb on Christian missionaries
He states that in Surah 33:9, the word "الله" was added in NLR Marcel 11 (dated to?) The word "الله" was already present in other earlier dated manuscripts such as the Tübingen Fragments, Codex Is. 1615I and other manuscripts. Hence, the omission is accidental. (4) t.co/KBIzLUE6P6
I think many people haven’t actually read your book. Your book and its examples of different manuscripts and its corrections was a fascinating look into the past.
Historically there was variant Quran even if we have no manuscripts to show: the variant Quran of Ibn Masood. If after the standardisation of the Uthmanic text everyone forgot all variant Qurans then why was it spotted, 300 years later after Ibn Masood, and documented by ibn Nadim in his book Fihrist? Here is a hadith proving there was a variant Quran th-cam.com/video/oJR7AkWHr7A/w-d-xo.html and th-cam.com/video/5f8yH50wS2o/w-d-xo.html
his words are full of lies and misinformation, he identify things that are not true and you talk about the Quran as if he is researching it, search carefully and do not deceive Christians with your lies, and the amazing thing is that you did not talk about the Bible and the thousands of errors and contradictions in it, I advise you to search more about the Quran and The Bible and do not be fooled by the words of this hateer of Muslims, search for more reliable sources, if you are looking for the truth
daily recipes handbook I don’t actually care about Christians or Muslims arguing about wether or not a “holy scripture” is preserved. I bought his book because I was curious and it has examples of historical manuscripts. And I quote him for you: “-in my book I never spoke of disproving the preservation of the Quran. Other people may project such purpose onto the work, but a scholar does not set out with a pre-determined outcome or conclusion, but rather to test a hypothesis by asking questions in the context of good research design”
@@Sixtra I do not tell you not to search, but search honestly, this is not a game, but this is either heaven or fire, so the stakes are many. A Muslim, Christian or Jew has to search for truth everywhere. I watch videos of Christians and Muslims together, but I know Christians They have honesty in research, not only attacking other religions, and this is what I hate in researchers. As a Muslim I love Jesus in my own way and I believe in him and I do not insult him and I do not insult anyone from his family, and if I search for Christianity I search with the Christians themselves so that I do not wrong them We, when debating with Christians, we always quote from the Bible in order not to wrong you. I just want the Christian researcher to respect Muslims in his research and to take his research from all reliable sources. He also has to research the Arabic language and how the Arabs used to write, for example in At the time of the Prophet Muhammad, the words were not in dots, but were different. Then the Arabs added to them the points after that. The Arabs also added in their books explanations of the words, but they were not included in the sentences.
daily recipes handbook His book has about 20 ex and it isn’t a scholarly argument against the preservation, it just shows that there’s corrections throughout different manuscripts. These manuscripts have been written by human hands so of course mistakes will happen. If people debate and wants to disprove each other’s religions, of course they will use different arguments from their opponents scriptures etc. But I don’t see these kind of arguments in Brubaker’s book, but others may use his book as “proof” but I see no point with that. But that’s just my opinion. For me, this is just different examples of manuscripts belonging to a scripture that people believe in “as the words from Allah”. I don’t believe in the Bible nor the Qur’an 😉
Dan, you are doing a great work. You will be remembered for this work for decades, if not centuries. Where can one find a copy of your dissertation? 🙏🙏🙏
Historically there was variant Quran even if we have no manuscripts to show: the variant Quran of Ibn Masood. If after the standardisation of the Uthmanic text everyone forgot all variant Qurans then why was it spotted, 300 years later after Ibn Masood, and documented by ibn Nadim in his book Fihrist? Here is a hadith proving there was a variant Quran th-cam.com/video/oJR7AkWHr7A/w-d-xo.html and th-cam.com/video/5f8yH50wS2o/w-d-xo.html
his words are full of lies and misinformation, he identify things that are not true and you talk about the Quran as if he is researching it, search carefully and do not deceive Christians with your lies, and the amazing thing is that you did not talk about the Bible and the thousands of errors and contradictions in it, I advise you to search more about the Quran and The Bible and do not be fooled by the words of this hateer of Muslims, search for more reliable sources, if you are looking for the truth
He states that in Surah 33:9, the word "الله" was added in NLR Marcel 11 (dated to?) The word "الله" was already present in other earlier dated manuscripts such as the Tübingen Fragments, Codex Is. 1615I and other manuscripts. Hence, the omission is accidental. (4) t.co/KBIzLUE6P6
@@inquisitivemind007 He states that in Surah 33:9, the word "الله" was added in NLR Marcel 11 (dated to?) The word "الله" was already present in other earlier dated manuscripts such as the Tübingen Fragments, Codex Is. 1615I and other manuscripts. Hence, the omission is accidental. (4) t.co/KBIzLUE6P6
Hello and shalom dr dan, i have a few questions: 1. The English translation of early Qur'an manuscripts & fragments in a book form? 2. The upper & lower texts of the Sana'a manuscript in English & comparison study? 3. Mushaf Qur'an of Ali fragments? 4. the 7 different of hafs? 5. The textual criticism of the hadith, etc? 6. a early Qur'an verse in Cyprus?
Historically there was variant Quran even if we have no manuscripts to show: the variant Quran of Ibn Masood. If after the standardisation of the Uthmanic text everyone forgot all variant Qurans then why was it spotted, 300 years later after Ibn Masood, and documented by ibn Nadim in his book Fihrist? Here is a hadith proving there was a variant Quran th-cam.com/video/oJR7AkWHr7A/w-d-xo.html and th-cam.com/video/5f8yH50wS2o/w-d-xo.html
The Qur'an is perfectly preserved, just don't look in the out of favor Arabic Qur'ans at the bottom of the Nile, and don't look Uthman and Abu Bakker burning the Qur'an. Don't look in the mirror as you have decapitated your brain internally if you don't look. The Creator created "thinking man" and if you can't think and look at the problems and be a Muslim, then there is a real disconnect here. Looks like the Muslims have the wrong Creator. They need the real One as taught by the Holy Bible.
Historically there was variant Quran even if we have no manuscripts to show: the variant Quran of Ibn Masood. If after the standardisation of the Uthmanic text everyone forgot all variant Qurans then why was it spotted, 300 years later after Ibn Masood, and documented by ibn Nadim in his book Fihrist? Here is a hadith proving there was a variant Quran th-cam.com/video/oJR7AkWHr7A/w-d-xo.html and th-cam.com/video/5f8yH50wS2o/w-d-xo.html
his words are full of lies and misinformation, he identify things that are not true and you talk about the Quran as if he is researching it, search carefully and do not deceive Christians with your lies, and the amazing thing is that you did not talk about the Bible and the thousands of errors and contradictions in it, I advise you to search more about the Quran and The Bible and do not be fooled by the words of this hateer of Muslims, search for more reliable sources, if you are looking for the truth
@@dailyrecipeshandbook9349 The message of the Bible is without variants. The Quran is a joke. Muslims made the claim that it came in perfect form from heaven. Us Bible believers have never made such a claim about our Bible. We have thousands of manuscripts to prove the Bible's authenticity. The Quran has not one single manuscript to back its claim.
He states that in Surah 33:9, the word "الله" was added in NLR Marcel 11 (dated to?) The word "الله" was already present in other earlier dated manuscripts such as the Tübingen Fragments, Codex Is. 1615I and other manuscripts. Hence, the omission is accidental. (4) t.co/KBIzLUE6P6 accept now TRUTH he is EXPOSED
Dr Daniel, great video. Have you ever found an instance of a non Arabic word, written in Arabic script, erased and replaced by an Arabic word?I'm wondering if there might be evidence of a prior text of Babylonian Aramaic, written in Arabic script, that was later Arabised as the text was used outside the central Mesopotamian region.
Historically there was variant Quran even if we have no manuscripts to show: the variant Quran of Ibn Masood. If after the standardisation of the Uthmanic text everyone forgot all variant Qurans then why was it spotted, 300 years later after Ibn Masood, and documented by ibn Nadim in his book Fihrist? Here is a hadith proving there was a variant Quran th-cam.com/video/oJR7AkWHr7A/w-d-xo.html and th-cam.com/video/5f8yH50wS2o/w-d-xo.html
We Muslims received the Holy Quran by Oral transmission not by Transcription . We are familiar with Sana'a Manuscripts . The people who wrote Sana'a Manuscripts are not perfect and made Transcription errors that led to a deviation from the original and this deviation does not change from the original that Muslims memorize by Heart . you want to impose on Muslims that Transcription errors is corruption in the original and the Quran is not preserved.
his words are full of lies and misinformation, he identify things that are not true and you talk about the Quran as if he is researching it, search carefully and do not deceive Christians with your lies, and the amazing thing is that you did not talk about the Bible and the thousands of errors and contradictions in it, I advise you to search more about the Quran and The Bible and do not be fooled by the words of this hateer of Muslims, search for more reliable sources, if you are looking for the truth
@@1541965 LET ME SCHOOL YOU: firstly none of your precious 7 ahruf are mutawatir. They are ahad (single chain of transmission). Secondly the 7 ahruf that was chosen by Ibn Mujahid was out of many that was around that he chose based on the best grammar and not if it was really recited by the Muhammad and lastly all the recitors within the 7 aruf are declared weak in narrating hadith which automatically means they would be weak in recitation as - as they say in medical language - they have "cognitive disorder". On the 22nd October your 7 ahruf that you hide behind will shatter like glass and it will be the end of your dawah career. Here is what's coming soon brill.com/view/title/55138
This particular phrase is grammatically incorrect without he word الله in it. I mean if you take the verse as it is now, and remove the word الله from it, it will make no sense. So the error was made when writing this copy and then corrected by the reviser.
Hi, Thanks for providing the info. I don't want to be over critical but I'm just wondering if it is safe to show names of people from places like Pakistan or Indonesia. Would it be safer to black them out like D.Wood. does? Kind regards, Les
Thanks for what you do. We need to know where the shadows are when we're deciding doubt. Keep it simple short and clear with out bias and you will make a great difference.
Greetings from New Zealand... Great work - in your objectivity in your research and keeping your channel content free of rhetoric and unfounded speculations. Like your analogy between Oral transmission and written tranmission. To be more accurate, that earliest Mushafs without diacritics is like trying to sketch a sunset with charcoal, and as the diacriticals system evolve, it's be like progressing to a coloured painting to a B&W photograph and finally a coloured photograph.
@@variantquran4505 Yes, this is new and I'm sure that you will continue to grow and gain viewers. You have something different to offer than other sites so you are a nice addition. I appreciate and admire your scholarship and your work. It is interesting and so important.
Show Malasia this. Here Muhammad's companion Ibn Masud is telling us that the last 2 chapters are not part of the Quran th-cam.com/video/IvVUwApQjKY/w-d-xo.html
Good evening, greeting from Holland. My apologies for my grammar errors: reading and listening goes way better as writing. I have a question: what is the main difference between the Bible and Koran textual criticisms?
The bible is a collection of books one part is for the jews which is call the old testament second part is the good news which is about Jesus christ hence christianity.. they put them together to show that its talking about the same God and the same historical back ground... but for Quran is written by the arabs talking about a different God Allah who the pagans use to worship but still want to say he is the same as the God the jews and Christians worship.. which is wrong
Thank you for responding. I am familiar with the Bible even some with Biblical text criticism (higher and lower). Researching the original text. It got my interest. So my question is more at the level of research.. if there is a difference of research between textual criticism the Koran and the Bible.
@@dobberdop one Alexandra in islam is a prophet but in real life isn't and he is also a bisexual... in islam the 7 sleepers are a revelation but in reality it's a bedtime story written by a jews monk... in islam Ramadan starts from sun rise to sun set but in other places of the earth sometimes the sun doent set for a very longtime
Hi George. I understand your question, I think. It is a big answer, but in summary, the tools developed over the past couple of hundred years for biblical textual criticism have come to be applied and adapted for textual criticism of the Quran. Many principles apply in both cases. For example, why do scribes make mistakes? There are well-known causes related to our human frailty, like the tendency for two instances of the same word or phrase in close proximity on a page to confuse a scribe and cause double-writing ("dittography") or the omission of a portion ("haplography"). There are some things that are different between biblical and quranic textual criticism based merely upon the different particulars, such as the development of Arabic orthography (something unique to the Quran's history as a written object, or the political environment, the suppression of variants, and so forth, which did not happen with the Bible. Hope that helps! I may talk about this at some point in a Q&A video. Thanks, DB
Historically there was variant Quran even if we have no manuscripts to show: the variant Quran of Ibn Masood. If after the standardisation of the Uthmanic text everyone forgot all variant Qurans then why was it spotted, 300 years later after Ibn Masood, and documented by ibn Nadim in his book Fihrist? Here is a hadith proving there was a variant Quran th-cam.com/video/oJR7AkWHr7A/w-d-xo.html and th-cam.com/video/5f8yH50wS2o/w-d-xo.html
He states that in Surah 33:9, the word "الله" was added in NLR Marcel 11 (dated to?) The word "الله" was already present in other earlier dated manuscripts such as the Tübingen Fragments, Codex Is. 1615I and other manuscripts. Hence, the omission is accidental. (4) t.co/KBIzLUE6P6
From Abu Safiyah on twitter.1. Brubaker states that in Surah 34:27 in Marcel 5, the phrase "هو الله" was inserted. The phrase "هو الله" is found perfectly fine in many earlier manuscripts: Or. 2165 (1st Century AH) Ma VI 165 (C:14: 649-675) Is. 1615 I (C:14: 591-643) Marcel 13
Lovely discussion and thank you for the timeline time stamps in the description below the video. 😍 It would be good to get fluorescence studies done when whole lines are erased. Some may have been scribal errors, but some may be true variants.
Thank God for you and Dr Jay Smith and David wood God bless you You work very hard I appreciate your work and I pray for you Lot of love brother Ev Aamir Masih Pakistan
Interesting to see pathetic islamophobes thanking exposed liars such as Jay Smith, psychopaths such as David Wood who actually tried to kill his father. Nothing based upon facts but lies and emotions
Left page - First part of the manuscript (top to red lines) reads: اں دعوا للرحمں ولدا ⡪ وما ٮٮٮعى للرحمں اں ٮٮحد ولدا ⡪ اں كل مں ڡى السمواٮ والارص الا اٮى الرحمں عٮدا ⡪ لٯد احصاهم وعدهم عدا ⡪ وكلهم اٮىه ٮوم الڡٮامه ڡردا ⡪ اں الدىں امٮوا وعملوا الصالحاٮ سٮحعل لهم الرحمں ودا ⡪ ڡاٮما ٮسرٮاه ٮلساىكـ لٮٮسر ٮه المٮڡىں وٮٮدر ٮه ڡوما لدا ⡪ وكم اهلكىا ڡٮلهم مں ڡرں هل ٮحس مٮهم مں احد او ٮسمع لهم ركرا ⡪ Modern quranic script reads the same: أَنْ دَعَوْا لِلرَّحْمَنِ وَلَدًا (91) وَمَا يَنْبَغِي لِلرَّحْمَنِ أَنْ يَتَّخِذَ وَلَدًا (92) إِنْ كُلُّ مَنْ فِي السَّمَوَاتِ وَالْأَرْضِ إِلَّا آَتِي الرَّحْمَنِ عَبْدًا (93) لَقَدْ أَحْصَاهُمْ وَعَدَّهُمْ عَدًّا (94) وَكُلُّهُمْ آَتِيهِ يَوْمَ الْقِيَامَةِ فَرْدًا (95) إِنَّ الَّذِينَ آَمَنُوا وَعَمِلُوا الصَّالِحَاتِ سَيَجْعَلُ لَهُمُ الرَّحْمَنُ وُدًّا (96) فَإِنَّمَا يَسَّرْنَاهُ بِلِسَانِكَ لِتُبَشِّرَ بِهِ الْمُتَّقِينَ وَتُنْذِرَ بِهِ قَوْمًا لُدًّا (97) وَكَمْ أَهْلَكْنَا قَبْلَهُمْ مِنْ قَرْنٍ هَلْ تُحِسُّ مِنْهُمْ مِنْ أَحَدٍ أَوْ تَسْمَعُ لَهُمْ رِكْزًا (98) Enlish most accurate meanings (by: quran.ksu.edu.sa - ksa): ( 91 ) That they attribute to the Most Merciful a son. ( 92 ) And it is not appropriate for the Most Merciful that He should take a son. ( 93 ) There is no one in the heavens and earth but that he comes to the Most Merciful as a servant. ( 94 ) He has enumerated them and counted them a [full] counting. ( 95 ) And all of them are coming to Him on the Day of Resurrection alone. ( 96 ) Indeed, those who have believed and done righteous deeds - the Most Merciful will appoint for them affection. ( 97 ) So, [O Muhammad], We have only made Qur'an easy in the Arabic language that you may give good tidings thereby to the righteous and warn thereby a hostile people. ( 98 ) And how many have We destroyed before them of generations? Do you perceive of them anyone or hear from them a sound? Chapter 19 (Maryam), verses 91-98 (last verse of the chapter). _______________ Left page - Second part of the manuscript (from the red lines to the end of the page) reads: ٮسم اللـه الرحمں الرحىم طه ⡪ ما اٮرلىا علىكـ الڡراں لٮسٯى ⡪ الا ٮدكره لمں ٮحسى ⡪ ٮٮرٮلا ممں حلٯ الارص والسمواٮ العلى ⡪ الرحمں على العرس اسٮوى ⡪ له ما ڡى السمواٮ وما ڡى الارص وما ٮٮٮهما وما ٮحٮ الٮرى ⡪ واں ٮحهر ٮالڡول ڡاىه ٮعلم السر واحڡى ⡪ اللـه لا اله الا هو له الاسما الحسىى ⡪ وهل اٮاكـ حدىٮ موسى ⡪ اد را ٮارا ڡڡال لاهله امكٮوا اىى اٮسٮ ٮارا لعلى اٮٮكم مٮها ٮڡٮس او احد على الٮار هدى ⡪ ڡلما اٮاها ٮودى ىا موسى ⡪ اىى اىا رٮكـ ڡاحلع ٮعلىكـ اىكـ ٮالواد المڡدس طوى ⡪ واىا احٮرٮكـ Modern quranic script reads the same: بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم طه (1) مَا أَنْزَلْنَا عَلَيْكَ الْقُرْآَنَ لِتَشْقَى (2) إِلَّا تَذْكِرَةً لِمَنْ يَخْشَى (3) تَنْزِيلًا مِمَّنْ خَلَقَ الْأَرْضَ وَالسَّمَوَاتِ الْعُلَى (4) الرَّحْمَنُ عَلَى الْعَرْشِ اسْتَوَى (5) لَهُ مَا فِي السَّمَوَاتِ وَمَا فِي الْأَرْضِ وَمَا بَيْنَهُمَا وَمَا تَحْتَ الثَّرَى (6) وَإِنْ تَجْهَرْ بِالْقَوْلِ فَإِنَّهُ يَعْلَمُ السِّرَّ وَأَخْفَى (7) اللَّهُ لَا إِلَهَ إِلَّا هُوَ لَهُ الْأَسْمَاءُ الْحُسْنَى (8) وَهَلْ أَتَاكَ حَدِيثُ مُوسَى (9) إِذْ رَأَى نَارًا فَقَالَ لِأَهْلِهِ امْكُثُوا إِنِّي آَنَسْتُ نَارًا لَعَلِّي آَتِيكُمْ مِنْهَا بِقَبَسٍ أَوْ أَجِدُ عَلَى النَّارِ هُدًى (10) فَلَمَّا أَتَاهَا نُودِيَ يَا مُوسَى (11) إِنِّي أَنَا رَبُّكَ فَاخْلَعْ نَعْلَيْكَ إِنَّكَ بِالْوَادِ الْمُقَدَّسِ طُوًى (12) وَأَنَا اخْتَرْتُكَ Enlish most accurate meanings (by: quran.ksu.edu.sa - ksa): ( 1 ) Ta, Ha. ( 2 ) We have not sent down to you the Qur'an that you be distressed ( 3 ) But only as a reminder for those who fear [Allah] - ( 4 ) A revelation from He who created the earth and highest heavens, ( 5 ) The Most Merciful [who is] above the Throne established. ( 6 ) To Him belongs what is in the heavens and what is on the earth and what is between them and what is under the soil. ( 7 ) And if you speak aloud - then indeed, He knows the secret and what is [even] more hidden. ( 8 ) Allah - there is no deity except Him. To Him belong the best names. ( 9 ) And has the story of Moses reached you? - ( 10 ) When he saw a fire and said to his family, "Stay here; indeed, I have perceived a fire; perhaps I can bring you a torch or find at the fire some guidance." ( 11 ) And when he came to it, he was called, "O Moses, ( 12 ) Indeed, I am your Lord, so remove your sandals. Indeed, you are in the sacred valley of Tuwa. ( 13 ) And I have chosen you, Chapter 20 (Taha), verses 1-12 (and two Arabic words of verse 13 then the manuscript sorrowfully shows no more).
"al-lah is the deciever, even the best deciever", he against The Most High YHVH The GOD Of Israel. he wants to be Like YHVH The Most High. here is the deciever said: (Isayah 14:14 ) " I will ascend above the heights of the clouds; I will make myself Like The Most High.''
He states that in Surah 33:9, the word "الله" was added in NLR Marcel 11 (dated to?) The word "الله" was already present in other earlier dated manuscripts such as the Tübingen Fragments, Codex Is. 1615I and other manuscripts. Hence, the omission is accidental. (4) t.co/KBIzLUE6P6
@@ISLAMICDEFENSE9302 im looking forward to seeing you jaw drop when that Arabic piece of poetry you call the Quran will be unvelied on the 22nd October th-cam.com/video/8qZPBLY4Uf0/w-d-xo.html
Hello, you mentioned that the word was corrected or inserted in many manuscripts. Do we have other manuscripts from the same period or earlier where the word appears in the same place? What percentage of these manuscripts show this correction? Note: In the past, it was possible for a scribe to transcribe the Quran without having memorized it, and even the most knowledgeable imams could make mistakes. Some errors in Quranic manuscripts are common, often due to similarities with other verses that omit the word in question.
Well explained. I don't think any unbiased person would conclude that those "corrections" are due merely to ordinary scribal mistakes, and certainly not from a scribe correcting himself.
@@moe8686 LOL. You don't Have the SLIGHTEST clue how manuscript copying works or how textual criticism seeks to uncover the original text. I'm not surprised, as these are topics even Muslim scholars are afraid to learn about, but if you want to "refute" anyone, you need to actually understand what you are talking about first. Brubaker is not remotely claiming that was the "first ever" manuscript to have such text, so you have responded to a straw man. Well done. What is actually going on is one textual tradition (as reflected by the original hand) being brought inline with a different textual tradition (as reflected by the correcting hand), not the wholesale creation of a new textual tradition. I suggest you read an introductory textbook on textual criticism before commenting further.
@@moe8686 LOL. You literally just took my post and copied some phrases. How old are you, five? Since when was "no I'm not, you are" a valid argument? Do you even understand what "strawman" means (clearly you don't)? Come back when you learn how textual criticism works. Until then, you are clearly uninterested in truth since you are commenting on things you are clueless about and using terms you clearly don't understand.
@@moe8686 Considering you don't even understand what a "strawman argument is," you probably shouldn't be judging whether you have been refuted or not. To anyone who actually understand the issue (which clearly rules you out), my original comment thoroughly refuted you. Your entire post is based on an incorrect assumption about how textual criticism is done. Reread it and see if you can figure it out. If you can't even figure out what my reply means, then I have been proven correct - you need to get an introductory book on textual criticism before commenting further.
@@moe8686 _"Your replying to irrelevant things. Address my points and be a man."_ I addressed your points in my first post. If you don't understand how, then you need to learn how textual criticism is done. (You don't have to agree with the argument, but you do have to understand what it is before you can "refute" it.) _"You showed me scribal human mistakes"_ Incorrect. That is just your conclusion, which is based on fallacious reasoning. ("It existed in an earlier manuscript, so the difference must be an error correction.") You seem to think "earliest manuscript" is the beginning and end of textual criticism. You are WAY wrong. BUT, the earliest Quran manuscript is the lower text of Saana and that shows abundant difference with the modern Quran. So by your own faulty criteria, the Quran is corrupt. _"I'm asking for proof of the corruption of the Quran."_ I can't do that until you understand textual criticism, and I don't have time to teach you the subject in YT comments. Read an introductory textbook first and then I'll be happy to explain whatever it is you still don't understand.
You have done a good job, good observations but a lot more analysis is required. To find out the reason of these variations/changes/fixes, whether they are simple mistake corrections or forgeries, you need to perform a comparative analysis with other MSS, read the context, analyze the rhythm of the text and read the same type of phrases in different locations/surahs. You will soon reach to a conclusion. This may also realized that how difficult this work was at that time. This will eventually come to understand that "THE MESSAGE" is still continues to be preserved. Everyone is putting contribution in it's preservation till this day. The different CODEX variants are validating one another's text, a glimpse of a BLOCK CHAIN, the mistakes or forgeries are self-exposing.
Well, pretty much of this "corrections" / "additions" / differemces was considered as manuscript error due to human error in writing it down, which is normal in all of the old manuscripts of old religions. So, all and all, 10 years of work was refuted..
Do you mean a copy of my book, or a copy of the pictures of the manuscripts themselves? I can tell you either way, so, please clarify your question and I will try to help. Best wishes, DB
Thanks Dr. Brubaker for your work. It gonna go a long way in helping us understand the issues surrendering the Quran and it's preservation. I got a little comment on the video quality: the video is superb; great lighting and sound quality but this video in particular has too many transitions; this quick movements strain the eyes, especially when they are frequent. Thanks.
Preservation does not mean that no copy of the Quran will never have a written or printed error in it, even copies printed today contain errors that are easily picked out by memorisers of the Quran. These corrections actually show that there was an acceptable widespread standard version of the Quran that has been preserved that overrided the errors in these anamolous copies hence the corrections.
the claim we have always heard though is: "Over the last fourteen centuries, this authentic word of God has been preserved without slightest alterations, admixture or adulterations, whatsoever." "It is a miracle of the Qur’an that no change has occurred in a single word, a single [letter of the] alphabet, a single punctuation mark, or a single diacritical mark in the text of the Qur’an during the last fourteen centuries." - Mazhar Kazi Sayyid Abul A'la Mawdudi likewise claims: "The original texts of most of the former Divine Books were lost altogether, and only their translations exist today. The Qur’an, on the other hand, exists exactly as it had been revealed to the Prophet; not a word - nay, not a dot of it - has been changed. It is available in its original text and the Word of God has been preserved for all times to come."3 and Dr. Zakir Naik asserts: "Since there was to be no messenger after Prophet Muhammad (pbuh), the Book revealed to him (i.e. the Glorious Quran) was preserved word for word so that it should be the same source of guidance for all times." and according to I. A. Ibrahim: "Not one letter of the Qur’an has been changed over the centuries." Yet here we can clearly see letters, punctuation, and whole words being changed. If it was just one mistake in one, that would not be as much, but as we have seen it is often the same mistake across multiple manuscripts. Does that not call into question which reading is actually authentic when a large number differ? As for memorizers, we know they can make mistakes too, and we see that even in the early Islamic sources, as only one person remembered a verse, memorizers die, and so they knew they needed to compile it as a more reliable method, even thoguh muhammad never ordered such a thing, yet another concern of theirs.
@@caos1925 It hasn't been changed, a few erroneous manuscripts that died out actually enforces this fact. 140,000 companions of the Prophet Muhammad performed pilgrimage with him in his farewell pilgrimage, the majority of them had memorised the entire or majority of the Quran and this was passed on to the next generations.
We appreciate your wonderful efforts Sir 🙏 much respect. just I have a question. Have you come across any manuscript of the Qur’an in your studies without any trace of distortion in it? And thank You. 🌹
Thank you for the shout out Sir. Hopefully through this video, Moslems will accept the fact that Koran is also subject to being researched and scrutinized. Bible has been through it for hundreds of years and still it stands tall. See if Koran will stand tall through criticism. If possible, please give the subtitle in your video so for the non speaking English people will follow the video well. Greeting from Indonesia
I like to work with the Fatiha, since it is so common. I point out that was not in the Quran of Ibn Masoud because it is a liturgical prayer. Beyond that, it would help me to know how many variants there are in it. I know the Ruler/Lord one. Are there others?
We truly appreciate your scholarly work not because you have found errors in the Quranic manuscripts but for your dedicated time consuming research you put in to analyzing the ancient texts. Hope to get my hands on your book some day.
he has even messed up with basic manuscript and once even said “look a difference” and saw the numbers within the writing (as it used to be per ayah) and counted the NUMBERS as letters - guys a joke
@@TheGEOPOLITICIANGUY We truly appreciate your scholarly work Dr. Brubaker, not because you have found errors in the Quranic manuscripts but for your dedicated time consuming research you put in to analyzing the ancient texts. Hope to get my hands on your book some day. *Without lies, Islam dies!*
Hello, I've studied this year around 1000 of the variants between the textus receptus and the codex sinaiticus (of the new testament) I've found many similar variants where we find "he" in the CS when there is "Jesus" or "Christ" or "God" in the TR. And in some cases there are also variants the other way round. Comparing to what you find concerning the coran I was thinking that the codex sinaiticus might be just like the coran a book that has been written down after oral transmission. In oral transmission these errors seem to be very common. I'm not doing this to defend the TR but I'm just trying to find an explanation for the variants we find in our Bibles. If the Byzintine text was transmitted in a more organised and wealthy region we might exclude oral transmission for that text. I've done no studies at all and I've no other ressources than my TR and the sinaiticus website. If I'm the first one who has this idea maybe someone knows about a scholar who could to do some research on this.
@@dianamv1618 Thank you dianamv1618 I had heard some of this before but I quite forgot. As I'm writing something about the CS I really needed this information. The thing is that it's not commonly accepted that the Codes S is a forgery by C. Simonides. Those who are in favor of the codex would argue that the codex sinaïticus is just one of the familly of the "alexandrian texts" As if it's just one of many texts who are similar to eachother. If the sinaiticus is a forgery, did Constantine Simonides had access to the codex vaticanus to make a copy that would be similar? Or did he make both of them ? If the 2 codexes are the only ones without Marc 16 and John 8. How could Simonides have known to make his forgery similar to the vaticanus ? I'm not saying it's impossible, but I would need some plausible conspiracy theory to explain the origin of similarities with the codex vatinanus. This means there need to be more people involved then just Simonides.
Good morning, two questions impose themselves after watching the video . 1st do this replacements, corrections and additions change the meaning of the verse ? Do they change/affect the general meaning of the Quran verses and the message Mohammed delivered ? İf so how ? To whom/ to what direction this changes -if exist -serve? 2. Why does the word Allah in particular being used and replaced changed ? Trying to make it appearing so much ? What is the reason ? Thanks in advance .
Dear sir, You were kind enough to respond to a question of mine a short time ago. I have been interested in this subject since the 1980s. It was considered, and is still considered, by many people as an odd thing to want to know about. So I hope you will answer another question. Where and how why do you think islam developed? I know that's a rather big one. One of my own idea's is that the Arab's probably saw the opportunity that was developing because of the Persian verses Roman war, and then created a framework to explain their meteoric success. The crass musings of a layman lol and only one of them I'm afraid.
Historically there was variant Quran even if we have no manuscripts to show: the variant Quran of Ibn Masood. If after the standardisation of the Uthmanic text everyone forgot all variant Qurans then why was it spotted, 300 years later after Ibn Masood, and documented by ibn Nadim in his book Fihrist? Here is a hadith proving there was a variant Quran th-cam.com/video/oJR7AkWHr7A/w-d-xo.html and th-cam.com/video/5f8yH50wS2o/w-d-xo.html
I appreciate your work. Im doing my second B.A in Religious Studies so this does help me understand this topic better since it requires a lot respect and professionalism.
Clarification of my comments on the final example above, from BnF arabe 326a: Despite my acknowledgement of the possibility, I do not think this particular correction was done near the time of production. It does not look like a very old correction; in fact, to me it looks possibly much more recent. Thanks! DB
Oh how magnificent would it be if we were able to date ink...
And without destroying the document...
@Constanze Constantia I doubt that manuscripts would have been corrected while in the care of modern museums or libraries. But, occasionally I've noted corrections that look like they were made with a more modern pen. This one was made with a chisel-tipped writing pen, but its features do not in my opinion place it near the time of production.
@@SaintOtter Yes. It is a question often asked. To my knowledge there is no way yet. And, even if/when there is eventually a way, it will only be for dating inks that contain organic material. But, the problem at the moment is that radiocarbon dating is destructive and requires a larger volume of material than can be gained by a small scraping of ink. Maybe in the future!
Compared to the Bible and other ancient manuscripts, how much quranic or related material is there?
@@variantquran4505 you are doing great job. Your videos are amazingly educational and informative.
Pls no read out comments, unnecessary prolong videos will make others ignore it.
I was an educated Suni Afghan muslim, i left it and very happy ❤❤
How many rakat in a wudu?
Glad you did my friend , what do you believe in now?
Islam is Cancer, Jesus Christ is the Answer.
@@orioner5299 LOL - show me where does allah say that he revealed quran to messenger mohammed (word for word from quran only) - who wrote quran ??? and why is allah saying shahada suray 3:18? why does allah need human help at all suray 47:7 ?? why does allah allow wife beating suray 4:34? why did allah give permission to unalive an innocent boy based on allahs fear reason suray 18:74 +18:80 .....
Why
@@orioner5299 show full / complete method of salah incl.rakah from quran - quran is complete n in detail suray 6:114 - so answer my question from quran without tafseer`suray 25:33 quran is in best tafsser .
With respect to Q.33:73 it seems to me that if you add words to a line of poetry, that you will change the metre of the verse. Do you find that this addition (and others like it) will fix or damage the rhythm of the Arabic?
Q.7:44 reminded me of some guy I read a while back, he noticed that with a handful of exceptions that the Meccan Suras did not use the word "Allah" but "Rabbi/Lord." He surmised that where these verses had the word "Allah" that it was added at a later date. Q7 & Q34 are both Meccan Suras.
Unveiled: companion of Muhammad tells us that chapter 113 and 114 are not part of the Quran th-cam.com/video/IvVUwApQjKY/w-d-xo.html
Finally you realize that an error by name figure or something on a narative never renders it entirely wrong.thsg Should be applied to gospels
I wish more doctors had their own channels.
Historically there was variant Quran even if we have no manuscripts to show: the variant Quran of Ibn Masood. If after the standardisation of the Uthmanic text everyone forgot all variant Qurans then why was it spotted, 300 years later after Ibn Masood, and documented by ibn Nadim in his book Fihrist? Here is a hadith proving there was a variant Quran th-cam.com/video/oJR7AkWHr7A/w-d-xo.html and th-cam.com/video/5f8yH50wS2o/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/yEOykrjhp1c/w-d-xo.html
Dr Berg, Dr Axe, Dr Oz, Dr Boz,...
You cant even be called a doctor if you dont have your own yt channel
You don't watch Dr Mike?He is so popular and good looking medical doctor.
Thank you Dr. Brubaker! Indonesian Muslims need to watch your channel!
@praedicator veritatis. Could you translate David wood lastest video about Quran not preserved and ofc this channel to bahasa Indonesia, please? It would help to stop the ignorance of Muslim Indonesia
@@andyandroid2155 SURE. I actually have started the translation process.
I have subscribed you!!! Please do more more translation. Many of CP videos too. Thank you for your hard work!!! God bless you.
@@andyandroid2155 Thank you veru much. Please help sharing!
Show Indonesia this. Here Muhammad's companion Ibn Masud is telling us that the last 2 chapters are not part of the Quran th-cam.com/video/IvVUwApQjKY/w-d-xo.html
God bless you Dr. Love all the way from Afghanistan 🇦🇫. We are really enjoying your videos
Thank you! Great to hear this. DB
God bless you guys! God bless Afghanistan in Jesus' mighty Name! 🙏
Asalaam alaikum! It is great to see Afghan believers! I pray for the underground church there, that the Holy Spirit will continue to gather all the sheep and bless Afghanistan with the peace and joy of Christ.
That is incredible. Someone from 🇦🇫 here. Thank you for posting on this cite Afghan ultimate challengers & I'm glad it's "we"
Blessings
Historically there was variant Quran even if we have no manuscripts to show: the variant Quran of Ibn Masood. If after the standardisation of the Uthmanic text everyone forgot all variant Qurans then why was it spotted, 300 years later after Ibn Masood, and documented by ibn Nadim in his book Fihrist? Here is a hadith proving there was a variant Quran th-cam.com/video/oJR7AkWHr7A/w-d-xo.html and th-cam.com/video/5f8yH50wS2o/w-d-xo.html
For most Muslims in Indonesia, they have never read the history of the Quran, they only hear from the Ustadz and think that this book is original, revealed, has not been altered and has been preserved by Allah ... moreover, the biggest problem is that most of them do not know the Arabic script and language.
I'm also Christian apologist student
Historically there was variant Quran even if we have no manuscripts to show: the variant Quran of Ibn Masood. If after the standardisation of the Uthmanic text everyone forgot all variant Qurans then why was it spotted, 300 years later after Ibn Masood, and documented by ibn Nadim in his book Fihrist? Here is a hadith proving there was a variant Quran th-cam.com/video/oJR7AkWHr7A/w-d-xo.html and th-cam.com/video/5f8yH50wS2o/w-d-xo.html
Explain this 4 me ...Jesus Says - GOD OUR LORD IS ONE
who Gave you Authority to Say God is 3 in 1 ? Explain & do not run away
@Testament Faith cheap discounted god believe in 1 & Get 2 Free // i m defender of Islam But our topic is ur False Doctrine of 3nty which will Cast u to hell 4 eternity
see my chnl as i respond to sam sahmoun abt Oneness in Quran
@Testament Faith & who teach that ...is t Jesus or your church ?
@Testament Faith i Accept him as My Quran Say not as ur Bible Degrade him
God bless you, you are doing good job from Pakistan
Historically there was variant Quran even if we have no manuscripts to show: the variant Quran of Ibn Masood. If after the standardisation of the Uthmanic text everyone forgot all variant Qurans then why was it spotted, 300 years later after Ibn Masood, and documented by ibn Nadim in his book Fihrist? Here is a hadith proving there was a variant Quran th-cam.com/video/oJR7AkWHr7A/w-d-xo.html and th-cam.com/video/5f8yH50wS2o/w-d-xo.html
his words are full of lies and misinformation, he identify things that are not true and you talk about the Quran as if he is researching it, search carefully and do not deceive Christians with your lies, and the amazing thing is that you did not talk about the Bible and the thousands of errors and contradictions in it, I advise you to search more about the Quran and The Bible and do not be fooled by the words of this hateer of Muslims, search for more reliable sources, if you are looking for the truth
@Zack Smith I don't know if you have seen his latest video but he has found 5 manuscripts with the same correction in it. This will be the end of the matter. No more manuscripts produced by Muslim apologists to counter it this time. Just wait and see - it will be his next video
@Zack Smith up and coming one - not existing one.
@Shashank Tripathi Jesus was a socialist, technically.
Thanks. David wood channel brought me here.
From a liar to a liar.
' birds of the feather stick together'
@@Yuki.2022
Are they the ones who told Yasir Qadhi to say the standard narrative has Holes in it.
Please practice your Taqquire elsewhere. It won't work here. The God of this platform is not the best of deceiver.
Please don't be offended.
Jesus love you.
😊
He states that in Surah 33:9, the word "الله" was added in NLR Marcel 11 (dated to?) The word "الله" was already present in other earlier dated manuscripts such as the Tübingen Fragments, Codex Is. 1615I and other manuscripts. Hence, the omission is accidental.
(4) t.co/KBIzLUE6P6
he got exposed by Farid in this 300 pages refutation :) www.academia.edu/44414539/The_Insignificance_of_Corrections_in_Early_Qur%C4%81n_Manuscripts_a_response_to_Daniel_Alan_Brubaker
Four examples of corrections to the 'errorless' Quran manuscripts in just one short video and that is just scratching the surface. Thank you for this information.Looking forward to seeing your response to Shabir Ally.
@@moe8686 Historically there was variant Quran even if we have no manuscripts to show: the variant Quran of Ibn Masood. If after the standardisation of the Uthmanic text everyone forgot all variant Qurans then why was it spotted, 300 years later after Ibn Masood, and documented by ibn Nadim in his book Fihrist? Here is a hadith proving there was a variant Quran th-cam.com/video/oJR7AkWHr7A/w-d-xo.html and th-cam.com/video/5f8yH50wS2o/w-d-xo.html
Dr Dan has been refuted big time. Watch this short video for Farid. 😊
th-cam.com/video/YfQ2bkO8y7A/w-d-xo.html
@@moe8686 😂🤣
@@moe8686 ...A book is not an authority. Jesus left a Church, not a book.
@@moe8686 can you show a single Qur'an manuscript from the 1st century of islam
Those dislikers didn't even watch the video.
Historically there was variant Quran even if we have no manuscripts to show: the variant Quran of Ibn Masood. If after the standardisation of the Uthmanic text everyone forgot all variant Qurans then why was it spotted, 300 years later after Ibn Masood, and documented by ibn Nadim in his book Fihrist? Here is a hadith proving there was a variant Quran th-cam.com/video/oJR7AkWHr7A/w-d-xo.html and th-cam.com/video/5f8yH50wS2o/w-d-xo.html
his words are full of lies and misinformation, he identify things that are not true and you talk about the Quran as if he is researching it, search carefully and do not deceive Christians with your lies, and the amazing thing is that you did not talk about the Bible and the thousands of errors and contradictions in it, I advise you to search more about the Quran and The Bible and do not be fooled by the words of this hateer of Muslims, search for more reliable sources, if you are looking for the truth
Thats typical for our muslim friends
@@marcelmeuldijk
The muslim claim is that the quran we have today is preserved word for word and goes back to Othmanic Mushaf and the prophet....
Is this claime false? NO...!!!!
And this claim is atested by non muslim leading scholars.
Can we find qurans with error? sure we can....
@@marcelmeuldijk
The problem is that you dont even know that hafs or warsh is only the reading of the othmanic mushaf......and are only quiraats...
Very interesting in an age where apologetics is purely about backbiting eachother your channel brings a fresh of new air with pure education. Thankful and God bless you
You can thank the polemicist for that
Historically there was variant Quran even if we have no manuscripts to show: the variant Quran of Ibn Masood. If after the standardisation of the Uthmanic text everyone forgot all variant Qurans then why was it spotted, 300 years later after Ibn Masood, and documented by ibn Nadim in his book Fihrist? Here is a hadith proving there was a variant Quran th-cam.com/video/oJR7AkWHr7A/w-d-xo.html and th-cam.com/video/5f8yH50wS2o/w-d-xo.html
DB got refuted. I I encurage you to watch this by brother Farid
th-cam.com/video/YfQ2bkO8y7A/w-d-xo.html
his words are full of lies and misinformation, he identify things that are not true and you talk about the Quran as if he is researching it, search carefully and do not deceive Christians with your lies, and the amazing thing is that you did not talk about the Bible and the thousands of errors and contradictions in it, I advise you to search more about the Quran and The Bible and do not be fooled by the words of this hateer of Muslims, search for more reliable sources, if you are looking for the truth
@@dailyrecipeshandbook9349 yea , the Buble doesn't need to be perfectly preserved , but we still got the percfet word of God(Jesus). And also , the number of Quranic manuscript doesn't even come close to the Bible....and there is no variants in the essential doctrine(John 1:1 and Mark 14:62) , and also Dr.Dan have no intention of hating on Muslim , if you actually read his book you would know
Thanks for the clarity Dr.
Unveiled: companion of Muhammad tells us that chapter 113 and 114 are not part of the Quran th-cam.com/video/IvVUwApQjKY/w-d-xo.html
Moe th-cam.com/video/LxKV3g7iTCE/w-d-xo.html
@@moe8686 It will be all over in October 2020 when Ibn Mujahid and his 7 ahruf will be exposed by Shady Nasser's new book www.amazon.co.uk/dp/9004401970/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_apa_i_IH-xFbXCA5AXR Hiding the variants of the Quran behind the 7 ahruf will come to an end
He states that in Surah 33:9, the word "الله" was added in NLR Marcel 11 (dated to?) The word "الله" was already present in other earlier dated manuscripts such as the Tübingen Fragments, Codex Is. 1615I and other manuscripts. Hence, the omission is accidental.
(4) t.co/KBIzLUE6P6
@@inquisitivemind007 and all the fake allegations on Quran is answer by dr Shazad Saleem in 2016 by his book HISTORY of Quran it's hydrogen bomb on Christian missionaries
Well done, God bless you. I follow your study and comments with keen interest. Joseph Olaseni from Nigeria
Unveiled: companion of Muhammad tells us that chapter 113 and 114 are not part of the Quran th-cam.com/video/IvVUwApQjKY/w-d-xo.html
Thank you Joseph! DB
He states that in Surah 33:9, the word "الله" was added in NLR Marcel 11 (dated to?) The word "الله" was already present in other earlier dated manuscripts such as the Tübingen Fragments, Codex Is. 1615I and other manuscripts. Hence, the omission is accidental.
(4) t.co/KBIzLUE6P6
@@inquisitivemind007 this allegations is ANSWERED in 2015 don't WATCH ONE SIDE STORY
I think many people haven’t actually read your book.
Your book and its examples of different manuscripts and its corrections was a fascinating look into the past.
Historically there was variant Quran even if we have no manuscripts to show: the variant Quran of Ibn Masood. If after the standardisation of the Uthmanic text everyone forgot all variant Qurans then why was it spotted, 300 years later after Ibn Masood, and documented by ibn Nadim in his book Fihrist? Here is a hadith proving there was a variant Quran th-cam.com/video/oJR7AkWHr7A/w-d-xo.html and th-cam.com/video/5f8yH50wS2o/w-d-xo.html
his words are full of lies and misinformation, he identify things that are not true and you talk about the Quran as if he is researching it, search carefully and do not deceive Christians with your lies, and the amazing thing is that you did not talk about the Bible and the thousands of errors and contradictions in it, I advise you to search more about the Quran and The Bible and do not be fooled by the words of this hateer of Muslims, search for more reliable sources, if you are looking for the truth
daily recipes handbook I don’t actually care about Christians or Muslims arguing about wether or not a “holy scripture” is preserved.
I bought his book because I was curious and it has examples of historical manuscripts.
And I quote him for you:
“-in my book I never spoke of disproving the preservation of the Quran. Other people may project such purpose onto the work, but a scholar does not set out with a pre-determined outcome or conclusion, but rather to test a hypothesis by asking questions in the context of good research design”
@@Sixtra I do not tell you not to search, but search honestly, this is not a game, but this is either heaven or fire, so the stakes are many. A Muslim, Christian or Jew has to search for truth everywhere. I watch videos of Christians and Muslims together, but I know Christians They have honesty in research, not only attacking other religions, and this is what I hate in researchers. As a Muslim I love Jesus in my own way and I believe in him and I do not insult him and I do not insult anyone from his family, and if I search for Christianity I search with the Christians themselves so that I do not wrong them We, when debating with Christians, we always quote from the Bible in order not to wrong you. I just want the Christian researcher to respect Muslims in his research and to take his research from all reliable sources. He also has to research the Arabic language and how the Arabs used to write, for example in At the time of the Prophet Muhammad, the words were not in dots, but were different. Then the Arabs added to them the points after that. The Arabs also added in their books explanations of the words, but they were not included in the sentences.
daily recipes handbook His book has about 20 ex and it isn’t a scholarly argument against the preservation, it just shows that there’s corrections throughout different manuscripts.
These manuscripts have been written by human hands so of course mistakes will happen.
If people debate and wants to disprove each other’s religions, of course they will use different arguments from their opponents scriptures etc.
But I don’t see these kind of arguments in Brubaker’s book, but others may use his book as “proof” but I see no point with that. But that’s just my opinion.
For me, this is just different examples of manuscripts belonging to a scripture that people believe in “as the words from Allah”.
I don’t believe in the Bible nor the Qur’an 😉
Your description section is awesome, much appreciated.
Unveiled: companion of Muhammad tells us that chapter 113 and 114 are not part of the Quran th-cam.com/video/IvVUwApQjKY/w-d-xo.html
Watching from south africa 🇿🇦 God blessed
Amazed by your knowledge
Fellow south african here and also follow this channel
Shukran for these videos Habibi
Unveiled: companion of Muhammad tells us that chapter 113 and 114 are not part of the Quran th-cam.com/video/IvVUwApQjKY/w-d-xo.html
Dan, you are doing a great work. You will be remembered for this work for decades, if not centuries. Where can one find a copy of your dissertation? 🙏🙏🙏
Unveiled: companion of Muhammad tells us that chapter 113 and 114 are not part of the Quran th-cam.com/video/IvVUwApQjKY/w-d-xo.html
Islam. The “telephone game” of religions
Historically there was variant Quran even if we have no manuscripts to show: the variant Quran of Ibn Masood. If after the standardisation of the Uthmanic text everyone forgot all variant Qurans then why was it spotted, 300 years later after Ibn Masood, and documented by ibn Nadim in his book Fihrist? Here is a hadith proving there was a variant Quran th-cam.com/video/oJR7AkWHr7A/w-d-xo.html and th-cam.com/video/5f8yH50wS2o/w-d-xo.html
his words are full of lies and misinformation, he identify things that are not true and you talk about the Quran as if he is researching it, search carefully and do not deceive Christians with your lies, and the amazing thing is that you did not talk about the Bible and the thousands of errors and contradictions in it, I advise you to search more about the Quran and The Bible and do not be fooled by the words of this hateer of Muslims, search for more reliable sources, if you are looking for the truth
@@dailyrecipeshandbook9349 so sad. Willingly ignorant
He states that in Surah 33:9, the word "الله" was added in NLR Marcel 11 (dated to?) The word "الله" was already present in other earlier dated manuscripts such as the Tübingen Fragments, Codex Is. 1615I and other manuscripts. Hence, the omission is accidental.
(4) t.co/KBIzLUE6P6
@@inquisitivemind007 He states that in Surah 33:9, the word "الله" was added in NLR Marcel 11 (dated to?) The word "الله" was already present in other earlier dated manuscripts such as the Tübingen Fragments, Codex Is. 1615I and other manuscripts. Hence, the omission is accidental.
(4) t.co/KBIzLUE6P6
God bless you ✝️✝️✝️
Unveiled: companion of Muhammad tells us that chapter 113 and 114 are not part of the Quran th-cam.com/video/IvVUwApQjKY/w-d-xo.html
☪️ ☪️ ☪️
Thank you so much.. you have helped me to answer some questions of my muslim friends. Greeting from Indonesia
Hello and shalom dr dan, i have a few questions:
1. The English translation of early Qur'an manuscripts & fragments in a book form?
2. The upper & lower texts of the Sana'a manuscript in English & comparison study?
3. Mushaf Qur'an of Ali fragments?
4. the 7 different of hafs?
5. The textual criticism of the hadith, etc?
6. a early Qur'an verse in Cyprus?
Historically there was variant Quran even if we have no manuscripts to show: the variant Quran of Ibn Masood. If after the standardisation of the Uthmanic text everyone forgot all variant Qurans then why was it spotted, 300 years later after Ibn Masood, and documented by ibn Nadim in his book Fihrist? Here is a hadith proving there was a variant Quran th-cam.com/video/oJR7AkWHr7A/w-d-xo.html and th-cam.com/video/5f8yH50wS2o/w-d-xo.html
The Qur'an is perfectly preserved, just don't look in the out of favor Arabic Qur'ans at the bottom of the Nile, and don't look Uthman and Abu Bakker burning the Qur'an. Don't look in the mirror as you have decapitated your brain internally if you don't look.
The Creator created "thinking man" and if you can't think and look at the problems and be a Muslim, then there is a real disconnect here. Looks like the Muslims have the wrong Creator. They need the real One as taught by the Holy Bible.
Left islam in 2020 jan after reading quran - so happy today -
That one who disliked the video must be still living in denial and afraid to accept the truth. What a poor soul.
Historically there was variant Quran even if we have no manuscripts to show: the variant Quran of Ibn Masood. If after the standardisation of the Uthmanic text everyone forgot all variant Qurans then why was it spotted, 300 years later after Ibn Masood, and documented by ibn Nadim in his book Fihrist? Here is a hadith proving there was a variant Quran th-cam.com/video/oJR7AkWHr7A/w-d-xo.html and th-cam.com/video/5f8yH50wS2o/w-d-xo.html
his words are full of lies and misinformation, he identify things that are not true and you talk about the Quran as if he is researching it, search carefully and do not deceive Christians with your lies, and the amazing thing is that you did not talk about the Bible and the thousands of errors and contradictions in it, I advise you to search more about the Quran and The Bible and do not be fooled by the words of this hateer of Muslims, search for more reliable sources, if you are looking for the truth
@@dailyrecipeshandbook9349 The message of the Bible is without variants. The Quran is a joke. Muslims made the claim that it came in perfect form from heaven. Us Bible believers have never made such a claim about our Bible. We have thousands of manuscripts to prove the Bible's authenticity. The Quran has not one single manuscript to back its claim.
@@dailyrecipeshandbook9349
Ahhh abdul
Stop your fkg copy & paste
sh't.
May allahhh flute u, abu
He states that in Surah 33:9, the word "الله" was added in NLR Marcel 11 (dated to?) The word "الله" was already present in other earlier dated manuscripts such as the Tübingen Fragments, Codex Is. 1615I and other manuscripts. Hence, the omission is accidental.
(4) t.co/KBIzLUE6P6 accept now TRUTH he is EXPOSED
So blessed to have another competent Expositor like the Dizzle!! Thanks for all of your hard work!!
Unveiled: companion of Muhammad tells us that chapter 113 and 114 are not part of the Quran th-cam.com/video/IvVUwApQjKY/w-d-xo.html
Dr Daniel, great video. Have you ever found an instance of a non Arabic word, written in Arabic script, erased and replaced by an Arabic word?I'm wondering if there might be evidence of a prior text of Babylonian Aramaic, written in Arabic script, that was later Arabised as the text was used outside the central Mesopotamian region.
What made you interested in Quranic textual criticism?
I tell some of the story here: th-cam.com/video/IMa5tqfdNzw/w-d-xo.html Thanks for asking, DB
"Not a single letter changed" 🤣
Is there a Brubaker confidence/rating system for the "maybe" variants?
Unveiled: chapters that weren't meant to be in the Quran th-cam.com/video/IvVUwApQjKY/w-d-xo.html
quran is "preserved" by allah by adding "allah" ;)
Lmao 😂
Historically there was variant Quran even if we have no manuscripts to show: the variant Quran of Ibn Masood. If after the standardisation of the Uthmanic text everyone forgot all variant Qurans then why was it spotted, 300 years later after Ibn Masood, and documented by ibn Nadim in his book Fihrist? Here is a hadith proving there was a variant Quran th-cam.com/video/oJR7AkWHr7A/w-d-xo.html and th-cam.com/video/5f8yH50wS2o/w-d-xo.html
We Muslims received the Holy Quran by Oral transmission not by Transcription . We are familiar with Sana'a Manuscripts . The people who wrote Sana'a Manuscripts are not perfect and made Transcription errors that led to a deviation from the original and this deviation does not change from the original that Muslims memorize by Heart . you want to impose on Muslims that Transcription errors is corruption in the original and the Quran is not preserved.
his words are full of lies and misinformation, he identify things that are not true and you talk about the Quran as if he is researching it, search carefully and do not deceive Christians with your lies, and the amazing thing is that you did not talk about the Bible and the thousands of errors and contradictions in it, I advise you to search more about the Quran and The Bible and do not be fooled by the words of this hateer of Muslims, search for more reliable sources, if you are looking for the truth
@@1541965 LET ME SCHOOL YOU: firstly none of your precious 7 ahruf are mutawatir. They are ahad (single chain of transmission). Secondly the 7 ahruf that was chosen by Ibn Mujahid was out of many that was around that he chose based on the best grammar and not if it was really recited by the Muhammad and lastly all the recitors within the 7 aruf are declared weak in narrating hadith which automatically means they would be weak in recitation as - as they say in medical language - they have "cognitive disorder". On the 22nd October your 7 ahruf that you hide behind will shatter like glass and it will be the end of your dawah career. Here is what's coming soon brill.com/view/title/55138
This particular phrase is grammatically incorrect without he word الله in it. I mean if you take the verse as it is now, and remove the word الله from it, it will make no sense. So the error was made when writing this copy and then corrected by the reviser.
Are there any corrections that actually change or conflict with dogma?
Yes the Dogma that the Koran is eternal, written in Heaven and brought to earth (evidently preserved by God).
In 12:40 the pronoun changes. That means that the complete sentence means different, I guess not radical but some different.
That obviously depends on what you consider "dogma."
Hi, Thanks for providing the info. I don't want to be over critical but I'm just wondering if it is safe to show names of people from places like Pakistan or Indonesia. Would it be safer to black them out like D.Wood. does? Kind regards, Les
Thanks for what you do. We need to know where the shadows are when we're deciding doubt. Keep it simple short and clear with out bias and you will make a great difference.
Greetings from New Zealand... Great work - in your objectivity in your research and keeping your channel content free of rhetoric and unfounded speculations.
Like your analogy between Oral transmission and written tranmission. To be more accurate, that earliest Mushafs without diacritics is like trying to sketch a sunset with charcoal, and as the diacriticals system evolve, it's be like progressing to a coloured painting to a B&W photograph and finally a coloured photograph.
Such important work! Thanks so much! I wish you had 1.4million viewers instead of 1.4k, but maybe someday... Stay safe!
We are only two months into it. A good start, I think... Thanks for the kind words. DB
@@variantquran4505 Yes, this is new and I'm sure that you will continue to grow and gain viewers. You have something different to offer than other sites so you are a nice addition. I appreciate and admire your scholarship and your work. It is interesting and so important.
Dr Africa loves you .. and God loves you .. keep it up
Thank you, from Malaysia ❤❤❤
Show Malasia this. Here Muhammad's companion Ibn Masud is telling us that the last 2 chapters are not part of the Quran th-cam.com/video/IvVUwApQjKY/w-d-xo.html
Unveiled: companion of Muhammad tells us that chapter 113 and 114 are not part of the Quran th-cam.com/video/IvVUwApQjKY/w-d-xo.html
Good evening, greeting from Holland. My apologies for my grammar errors: reading and listening goes way better as writing.
I have a question: what is the main difference between the Bible and Koran textual criticisms?
The bible is a collection of books one part is for the jews which is call the old testament second part is the good news which is about Jesus christ hence christianity.. they put them together to show that its talking about the same God and the same historical back ground... but for Quran is written by the arabs talking about a different God Allah who the pagans use to worship but still want to say he is the same as the God the jews and Christians worship.. which is wrong
Thank you for responding.
I am familiar with the Bible even some with Biblical text criticism (higher and lower). Researching the original text. It got my interest.
So my question is more at the level of research.. if there is a difference of research between textual criticism the Koran and the Bible.
@@dobberdop one Alexandra in islam is a prophet but in real life isn't and he is also a bisexual... in islam the 7 sleepers are a revelation but in reality it's a bedtime story written by a jews monk... in islam Ramadan starts from sun rise to sun set but in other places of the earth sometimes the sun doent set for a very longtime
Unveiled: companion of Muhammad tells us that chapter 113 and 114 are not part of the Quran th-cam.com/video/IvVUwApQjKY/w-d-xo.html
Hi George. I understand your question, I think. It is a big answer, but in summary, the tools developed over the past couple of hundred years for biblical textual criticism have come to be applied and adapted for textual criticism of the Quran. Many principles apply in both cases. For example, why do scribes make mistakes? There are well-known causes related to our human frailty, like the tendency for two instances of the same word or phrase in close proximity on a page to confuse a scribe and cause double-writing ("dittography") or the omission of a portion ("haplography"). There are some things that are different between biblical and quranic textual criticism based merely upon the different particulars, such as the development of Arabic orthography (something unique to the Quran's history as a written object, or the political environment, the suppression of variants, and so forth, which did not happen with the Bible. Hope that helps! I may talk about this at some point in a Q&A video. Thanks, DB
You’ll want to use a Boom Mic, your voice or tone is quite mono.
Plus, it would increase the sound quality.
Good advice and great screen name.
Historically there was variant Quran even if we have no manuscripts to show: the variant Quran of Ibn Masood. If after the standardisation of the Uthmanic text everyone forgot all variant Qurans then why was it spotted, 300 years later after Ibn Masood, and documented by ibn Nadim in his book Fihrist? Here is a hadith proving there was a variant Quran th-cam.com/video/oJR7AkWHr7A/w-d-xo.html and th-cam.com/video/5f8yH50wS2o/w-d-xo.html
He states that in Surah 33:9, the word "الله" was added in NLR Marcel 11 (dated to?) The word "الله" was already present in other earlier dated manuscripts such as the Tübingen Fragments, Codex Is. 1615I and other manuscripts. Hence, the omission is accidental.
(4) t.co/KBIzLUE6P6
@@ISLAMICDEFENSE9302 Still spamming the same stupidity to more threads I see. Too bad you still fail basic logic.
@@ReasonedAnswers detail answer to his fake allegations on Quran th-cam.com/video/RWgAGaZALQs/w-d-xo.html
This strengthens my Imam and trust in allah subhana wa ta a’la he is most wiz’s allah aza wa jal
th-cam.com/video/YfQ2bkO8y7A/w-d-xo.html
lol
I don't know why christians are so happy about this?
Porque se derrumba la religión del anticristo. Porque la verdad es más fuerte!🥰☦
Dr. Brubaker, how did you create Quran Gateway? (Meaning what is the software and setup?) I’m genuinely curious
Holy smokes!! I had no idea Brubaker had his own channel. This is awesome.
Welcome! DB
Do you have digit copy of your book Dr. keep up the good work
Thank you. Yes, you can get it here: www.amazon.com/Corrections-Early-Qurʾān-Manuscripts-Examples-ebook/dp/B0C543XSSF?ref_=ast_author_mpb
You have viewers from Egypt too! You're not that popular yet. Maybe if you translated your video to Arabic, you'd get more views.
th-cam.com/video/yEOykrjhp1c/w-d-xo.html
this video is tranlated so that you can see the rightn way to Allah
@@تلاواتالقارئحسامالدوسري stupid Abdul 🤣 Airey be Mohammed 🤣
From Abu Safiyah on twitter.1. Brubaker states that in Surah 34:27 in Marcel 5, the phrase "هو الله" was inserted. The phrase "هو الله" is found perfectly fine in many earlier manuscripts: Or. 2165 (1st Century AH) Ma VI 165 (C:14: 649-675) Is. 1615 I (C:14: 591-643) Marcel 13
Ask Abu Safiyah to answer this th-cam.com/video/IvVUwApQjKY/w-d-xo.html
Lovely discussion and thank you for the timeline time stamps in the description below the video. 😍 It would be good to get fluorescence studies done when whole lines are erased. Some may have been scribal errors, but some may be true variants.
Thanks for your research and your hardwork in this field. Can you please tell me how long it took to do a research?
I see your trying to find a reason to create doubt in his research. The truth is out and I am going to befriend many Muslims to show them this.
Thank God for you and Dr Jay Smith and David wood God bless you
You work very hard I appreciate your work and I pray for you
Lot of love brother
Ev Aamir Masih Pakistan
Interesting to see pathetic islamophobes thanking exposed liars such as Jay Smith, psychopaths such as David Wood who actually tried to kill his father. Nothing based upon facts but lies and emotions
Keep up the good work. Thanks for the presentation.
Love your Great work Dr. Brubaker❤️be safe and God Bless You and Your Family
Thank you! DB
Because of your unboxing video: do you know Arabic Dr? or do those books have a English translation?
Left page - First part of the manuscript (top to red lines) reads:
اں دعوا للرحمں ولدا ⡪ وما ٮٮٮعى للرحمں اں ٮٮحد ولدا ⡪ اں كل مں ڡى السمواٮ والارص الا اٮى الرحمں عٮدا ⡪ لٯد احصاهم وعدهم عدا ⡪ وكلهم اٮىه ٮوم الڡٮامه ڡردا ⡪ اں الدىں امٮوا وعملوا الصالحاٮ سٮحعل لهم الرحمں ودا ⡪ ڡاٮما ٮسرٮاه ٮلساىكـ لٮٮسر ٮه المٮڡىں وٮٮدر ٮه ڡوما لدا ⡪ وكم اهلكىا ڡٮلهم مں ڡرں هل ٮحس مٮهم مں احد او ٮسمع لهم ركرا ⡪
Modern quranic script reads the same:
أَنْ دَعَوْا لِلرَّحْمَنِ وَلَدًا (91) وَمَا يَنْبَغِي لِلرَّحْمَنِ أَنْ يَتَّخِذَ وَلَدًا (92) إِنْ كُلُّ مَنْ فِي السَّمَوَاتِ وَالْأَرْضِ إِلَّا آَتِي الرَّحْمَنِ عَبْدًا (93) لَقَدْ أَحْصَاهُمْ وَعَدَّهُمْ عَدًّا (94) وَكُلُّهُمْ آَتِيهِ يَوْمَ الْقِيَامَةِ فَرْدًا (95) إِنَّ الَّذِينَ آَمَنُوا وَعَمِلُوا الصَّالِحَاتِ سَيَجْعَلُ لَهُمُ الرَّحْمَنُ وُدًّا (96) فَإِنَّمَا يَسَّرْنَاهُ بِلِسَانِكَ لِتُبَشِّرَ بِهِ الْمُتَّقِينَ وَتُنْذِرَ بِهِ قَوْمًا لُدًّا (97) وَكَمْ أَهْلَكْنَا قَبْلَهُمْ مِنْ قَرْنٍ هَلْ تُحِسُّ مِنْهُمْ مِنْ أَحَدٍ أَوْ تَسْمَعُ لَهُمْ رِكْزًا (98)
Enlish most accurate meanings (by: quran.ksu.edu.sa - ksa):
( 91 ) That they attribute to the Most Merciful a son.
( 92 ) And it is not appropriate for the Most Merciful that He should take a son.
( 93 ) There is no one in the heavens and earth but that he comes to the Most Merciful as a servant.
( 94 ) He has enumerated them and counted them a [full] counting.
( 95 ) And all of them are coming to Him on the Day of Resurrection alone.
( 96 ) Indeed, those who have believed and done righteous deeds - the Most Merciful will appoint for them affection.
( 97 ) So, [O Muhammad], We have only made Qur'an easy in the Arabic language that you may give good tidings thereby to the righteous and warn thereby a hostile people.
( 98 ) And how many have We destroyed before them of generations? Do you perceive of them anyone or hear from them a sound?
Chapter 19 (Maryam), verses 91-98 (last verse of the chapter).
_______________
Left page - Second part of the manuscript (from the red lines to the end of the page) reads:
ٮسم اللـه الرحمں الرحىم
طه ⡪ ما اٮرلىا علىكـ الڡراں لٮسٯى ⡪ الا ٮدكره لمں ٮحسى ⡪ ٮٮرٮلا ممں حلٯ الارص والسمواٮ العلى ⡪ الرحمں على العرس اسٮوى ⡪ له ما ڡى السمواٮ وما ڡى الارص وما ٮٮٮهما وما ٮحٮ الٮرى ⡪ واں ٮحهر ٮالڡول ڡاىه ٮعلم السر واحڡى ⡪ اللـه لا اله الا هو له الاسما الحسىى ⡪ وهل اٮاكـ حدىٮ موسى ⡪ اد را ٮارا ڡڡال لاهله امكٮوا اىى اٮسٮ ٮارا لعلى اٮٮكم مٮها ٮڡٮس او احد على الٮار هدى ⡪ ڡلما اٮاها ٮودى ىا موسى ⡪ اىى اىا رٮكـ ڡاحلع ٮعلىكـ اىكـ ٮالواد المڡدس طوى ⡪ واىا احٮرٮكـ
Modern quranic script reads the same:
بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم
طه (1) مَا أَنْزَلْنَا عَلَيْكَ الْقُرْآَنَ لِتَشْقَى (2) إِلَّا تَذْكِرَةً لِمَنْ يَخْشَى (3) تَنْزِيلًا مِمَّنْ خَلَقَ الْأَرْضَ وَالسَّمَوَاتِ الْعُلَى (4) الرَّحْمَنُ عَلَى الْعَرْشِ اسْتَوَى (5) لَهُ مَا فِي السَّمَوَاتِ وَمَا فِي الْأَرْضِ وَمَا بَيْنَهُمَا وَمَا تَحْتَ الثَّرَى (6) وَإِنْ تَجْهَرْ بِالْقَوْلِ فَإِنَّهُ يَعْلَمُ السِّرَّ وَأَخْفَى (7) اللَّهُ لَا إِلَهَ إِلَّا هُوَ لَهُ الْأَسْمَاءُ الْحُسْنَى (8) وَهَلْ أَتَاكَ حَدِيثُ مُوسَى (9) إِذْ رَأَى نَارًا فَقَالَ لِأَهْلِهِ امْكُثُوا إِنِّي آَنَسْتُ نَارًا لَعَلِّي آَتِيكُمْ مِنْهَا بِقَبَسٍ أَوْ أَجِدُ عَلَى النَّارِ هُدًى (10) فَلَمَّا أَتَاهَا نُودِيَ يَا مُوسَى (11) إِنِّي أَنَا رَبُّكَ فَاخْلَعْ نَعْلَيْكَ إِنَّكَ بِالْوَادِ الْمُقَدَّسِ طُوًى (12) وَأَنَا اخْتَرْتُكَ
Enlish most accurate meanings (by: quran.ksu.edu.sa - ksa):
( 1 ) Ta, Ha.
( 2 ) We have not sent down to you the Qur'an that you be distressed
( 3 ) But only as a reminder for those who fear [Allah] -
( 4 ) A revelation from He who created the earth and highest heavens,
( 5 ) The Most Merciful [who is] above the Throne established.
( 6 ) To Him belongs what is in the heavens and what is on the earth and what is between them and what is under the soil.
( 7 ) And if you speak aloud - then indeed, He knows the secret and what is [even] more hidden.
( 8 ) Allah - there is no deity except Him. To Him belong the best names.
( 9 ) And has the story of Moses reached you? -
( 10 ) When he saw a fire and said to his family, "Stay here; indeed, I have perceived a fire; perhaps I can bring you a torch or find at the fire some guidance."
( 11 ) And when he came to it, he was called, "O Moses,
( 12 ) Indeed, I am your Lord, so remove your sandals. Indeed, you are in the sacred valley of Tuwa.
( 13 ) And I have chosen you,
Chapter 20 (Taha), verses 1-12 (and two Arabic words of verse 13 then the manuscript sorrowfully shows no more).
Much better overview! Good description, good intro, very good
Quran is truth
That’s a lie you are taught to believe and you want to believe and you can’t afford to not believe..
Truth is hard to swallow…
@@chia-yinshih6155 ya truth is hard to believe and the truth is that the Quran is the word of Allah
@@riodox 🤣🤣🤣abdools
@@AceRamona--
"al-lah is the deciever, even the best deciever",
he against The Most High YHVH The GOD Of Israel.
he wants to be Like YHVH The Most High.
here is the deciever said:
(Isayah 14:14 )
" I will ascend above the heights of the clouds; I will make myself Like The Most High.''
Before you come and watch about quran go and lookup bible its a jungle of mistakes even profecies
You do such awesome work - and your name is even more awesome! ;) God bless
Unveiled: companion of Muhammad tells us that chapter 113 and 114 are not part of the Quran th-cam.com/video/IvVUwApQjKY/w-d-xo.html
He states that in Surah 33:9, the word "الله" was added in NLR Marcel 11 (dated to?) The word "الله" was already present in other earlier dated manuscripts such as the Tübingen Fragments, Codex Is. 1615I and other manuscripts. Hence, the omission is accidental.
(4) t.co/KBIzLUE6P6
@@inquisitivemind007 idiot don't WATCH ONE SIDE STORY
@@inquisitivemind007 the fake allegations is also answer in 2015 😂😂 this was suprises for you
@@ISLAMICDEFENSE9302 im looking forward to seeing you jaw drop when that Arabic piece of poetry you call the Quran will be unvelied on the 22nd October th-cam.com/video/8qZPBLY4Uf0/w-d-xo.html
Hello, you mentioned that the word was corrected or inserted in many manuscripts. Do we have other manuscripts from the same period or earlier where the word appears in the same place? What percentage of these manuscripts show this correction?
Note: In the past, it was possible for a scribe to transcribe the Quran without having memorized it, and even the most knowledgeable imams could make mistakes. Some errors in Quranic manuscripts are common, often due to similarities with other verses that omit the word in question.
Your work is awesome.
Well explained. I don't think any unbiased person would conclude that those "corrections" are due merely to ordinary scribal mistakes, and certainly not from a scribe correcting himself.
@@moe8686 LOL. You don't Have the SLIGHTEST clue how manuscript copying works or how textual criticism seeks to uncover the original text. I'm not surprised, as these are topics even Muslim scholars are afraid to learn about, but if you want to "refute" anyone, you need to actually understand what you are talking about first. Brubaker is not remotely claiming that was the "first ever" manuscript to have such text, so you have responded to a straw man. Well done. What is actually going on is one textual tradition (as reflected by the original hand) being brought inline with a different textual tradition (as reflected by the correcting hand), not the wholesale creation of a new textual tradition.
I suggest you read an introductory textbook on textual criticism before commenting further.
@@moe8686 LOL. You literally just took my post and copied some phrases. How old are you, five? Since when was "no I'm not, you are" a valid argument? Do you even understand what "strawman" means (clearly you don't)? Come back when you learn how textual criticism works. Until then, you are clearly uninterested in truth since you are commenting on things you are clueless about and using terms you clearly don't understand.
_"Die in ur Rage.
"_ I have zero rage. I think you are engaging is psychological projection.
@@moe8686 Considering you don't even understand what a "strawman argument is," you probably shouldn't be judging whether you have been refuted or not. To anyone who actually understand the issue (which clearly rules you out), my original comment thoroughly refuted you. Your entire post is based on an incorrect assumption about how textual criticism is done. Reread it and see if you can figure it out. If you can't even figure out what my reply means, then I have been proven correct - you need to get an introductory book on textual criticism before commenting further.
@@moe8686 _"Your replying to irrelevant things. Address my points and be a man."_ I addressed your points in my first post. If you don't understand how, then you need to learn how textual criticism is done. (You don't have to agree with the argument, but you do have to understand what it is before you can "refute" it.)
_"You showed me scribal human mistakes"_ Incorrect. That is just your conclusion, which is based on fallacious reasoning. ("It existed in an earlier manuscript, so the difference must be an error correction.") You seem to think "earliest manuscript" is the beginning and end of textual criticism. You are WAY wrong. BUT, the earliest Quran manuscript is the lower text of Saana and that shows abundant difference with the modern Quran. So by your own faulty criteria, the Quran is corrupt.
_"I'm asking for proof of the corruption of the Quran."_ I can't do that until you understand textual criticism, and I don't have time to teach you the subject in YT comments. Read an introductory textbook first and then I'll be happy to explain whatever it is you still don't understand.
Hi Dr, maybe it’s my phone, i think there’s too much echo than necessary.
Brilliant, 1400 years and finally the truth
You’re doing a monumental and a valuable great job!! Thank you!!
Ex muslim
Al-Quran 6 - 115
And the word of your Lord has been fulfilled in truth and in justice. None can alter His words, and He is the Hearing, the Knowing.
Hello again from Pakistan✋
I was super happy when you rad my comment.
Please keep doing the good work. The world is listening.
God bless❤️
Thank you, Jamal! DB
Unveiled: companion of Muhammad tells us that chapter 113 and 114 are not part of the Quran th-cam.com/video/IvVUwApQjKY/w-d-xo.html
You have done a good job, good observations but a lot more analysis is required. To find out the reason of these variations/changes/fixes, whether they are simple mistake corrections or forgeries, you need to perform a comparative analysis with other MSS, read the context, analyze the rhythm of the text and read the same type of phrases in different locations/surahs. You will soon reach to a conclusion. This may also realized that how difficult this work was at that time. This will eventually come to understand that "THE MESSAGE" is still continues to be preserved. Everyone is putting contribution in it's preservation till this day. The different CODEX variants are validating one another's text, a glimpse of a BLOCK CHAIN, the mistakes or forgeries are self-exposing.
Great work sir. Thank you for that!
Well, pretty much of this "corrections" / "additions" / differemces was considered as manuscript error due to human error in writing it down, which is normal in all of the old manuscripts of old religions. So, all and all, 10 years of work was refuted..
they're desperate to disprove islam lol
Wow, great Job. I came from Berlin and I know the Quran is a WarBook.
@Mansoor Ahmad Its been changed and corrupted and eaten by sheeps
@Mansoor Ahmad why don’t you read it first and learn the historical background
Salam
Thanks you for your giving effort
I want to ask you if you please tell me the way that I could get a copy of Quran manuscripts?
Do you mean a copy of my book, or a copy of the pictures of the manuscripts themselves? I can tell you either way, so, please clarify your question and I will try to help. Best wishes, DB
@@variantquran4505 thanks for replying
I mean both yours books and the pictures
Great scholarly work Dr. Daniel Brubaker!!! I hope adnan rashid and agha abbas the eternal lairs will watch this!!!
Mulxid Adnan Rashid has already addressed Dr brabakers lies
Where are these manuscripts came from? What year was the Carbon-dated show?
Thanks Dr. Brubaker for your work. It gonna go a long way in helping us understand the issues surrendering the Quran and it's preservation.
I got a little comment on the video quality: the video is superb; great lighting and sound quality but this video in particular has too many transitions; this quick movements strain the eyes, especially when they are frequent.
Thanks.
Thank you youtube.The light is here thanks to you
5 dislikes? which objective facts presented in this video are disliked?
Is these revisions present in other Qur'an manuscript of the same or earlier time?
Be safe brother. This is a great work
Thank you Mark, DB
Thank you for your sharing. With much appreciation from Malaysia.
Hello Dr Daniel watching from India as an ex muslim
i need info about ur sources
what is that paper u read !
Preservation does not mean that no copy of the Quran will never have a written or printed error in it, even copies printed today contain errors that are easily picked out by memorisers of the Quran. These corrections actually show that there was an acceptable widespread standard version of the Quran that has been preserved that overrided the errors in these anamolous copies hence the corrections.
the claim we have always heard though is:
"Over the last fourteen centuries, this authentic word of God has been preserved without slightest alterations, admixture or adulterations, whatsoever."
"It is a miracle of the Qur’an that no change has occurred in a single word, a single [letter of the] alphabet, a single punctuation mark, or a single diacritical mark in the text of the Qur’an during the last fourteen centuries." - Mazhar Kazi
Sayyid Abul A'la Mawdudi likewise claims:
"The original texts of most of the former Divine Books were lost altogether, and only their translations exist today. The Qur’an, on the other hand, exists exactly as it had been revealed to the Prophet; not a word - nay, not a dot of it - has been changed. It is available in its original text and the Word of God has been preserved for all times to come."3
and Dr. Zakir Naik asserts:
"Since there was to be no messenger after Prophet Muhammad (pbuh), the Book revealed to him (i.e. the Glorious Quran) was preserved word for word so that it should be the same source of guidance for all times."
and according to I. A. Ibrahim:
"Not one letter of the Qur’an has been changed over the centuries."
Yet here we can clearly see letters, punctuation, and whole words being changed. If it was just one mistake in one, that would not be as much, but as we have seen it is often the same mistake across multiple manuscripts. Does that not call into question which reading is actually authentic when a large number differ? As for memorizers, we know they can make mistakes too, and we see that even in the early Islamic sources, as only one person remembered a verse, memorizers die, and so they knew they needed to compile it as a more reliable method, even thoguh muhammad never ordered such a thing, yet another concern of theirs.
Accepted standard version of the Quran? Then can you kindly explain what this is th-cam.com/video/IvVUwApQjKY/w-d-xo.html
It's a comment in the form of statement... what proof do you have to substantiate your statement?
@@caos1925 It hasn't been changed, a few erroneous manuscripts that died out actually enforces this fact. 140,000 companions of the Prophet Muhammad performed pilgrimage with him in his farewell pilgrimage, the majority of them had memorised the entire or majority of the Quran and this was passed on to the next generations.
This is gonna change how Muslims view the Quran forever. Not one of the Quran can directly be traced to Mohamed.
smooth editing! your glasses suddenly appeared on your head! love your work! keep at it!
Unveiled: companion of Muhammad tells us that chapter 113 and 114 are not part of the Quran th-cam.com/video/IvVUwApQjKY/w-d-xo.html
We appreciate your wonderful efforts Sir 🙏 much respect.
just I have a question. Have you come across any manuscript of the Qur’an in your studies without any trace of distortion in it? And thank You. 🌹
Thank you for the shout out Sir. Hopefully through this video, Moslems will accept the fact that Koran is also subject to being researched and scrutinized. Bible has been through it for hundreds of years and still it stands tall. See if Koran will stand tall through criticism.
If possible, please give the subtitle in your video so for the non speaking English people will follow the video well. Greeting from Indonesia
😂🤣🤣😂deceptive attack on islam ...first Christian should try to solve the problem of trinity
I like to work with the Fatiha, since it is so common. I point out that was not in the Quran of Ibn Masoud because it is a liturgical prayer. Beyond that, it would help me to know how many variants there are in it. I know the Ruler/Lord one. Are there others?
We truly appreciate your scholarly work not because you have found errors in the Quranic manuscripts but for your dedicated time consuming research you put in to analyzing the ancient texts. Hope to get my hands on your book some day.
Unveiled: chapters that weren't meant to be in the Quran th-cam.com/video/IvVUwApQjKY/w-d-xo.html
he has been shown wrong sooo many times lmaooo
he has even messed up with basic manuscript and once even said “look a difference” and saw the numbers within the writing (as it used to be per ayah) and counted the NUMBERS as letters - guys a joke
@@TheGEOPOLITICIANGUY We truly appreciate your scholarly work Dr. Brubaker, not because you have found errors in the Quranic manuscripts but for your dedicated time consuming research you put in to analyzing the ancient texts. Hope to get my hands on your book some day.
*Without lies, Islam dies!*
Hello, I've studied this year around 1000 of the variants between the textus receptus and the codex sinaiticus (of the new testament)
I've found many similar variants where we find "he" in the CS when there is "Jesus" or "Christ" or "God" in the TR.
And in some cases there are also variants the other way round.
Comparing to what you find concerning the coran I was thinking that the codex sinaiticus might be just like the coran a book that has been written down after oral transmission.
In oral transmission these errors seem to be very common.
I'm not doing this to defend the TR but I'm just trying to find an explanation for the variants we find in our Bibles.
If the Byzintine text was transmitted in a more organised and wealthy region we might exclude oral transmission for that text.
I've done no studies at all and I've no other ressources than my TR and the sinaiticus website.
If I'm the first one who has this idea maybe someone knows about a scholar who could to do some research on this.
El codex siniaticus es posterior a la biblia
Busca el nombre de "Constantine Simonides". El escribió el Codex Sinaiticus. 🥰☦
@@dianamv1618 Thank you dianamv1618
I had heard some of this before but I quite forgot. As I'm writing something about the CS I really needed this information.
The thing is that it's not commonly accepted that the Codes S is a forgery by C. Simonides.
Those who are in favor of the codex would argue that the codex sinaïticus is just one of the familly of the "alexandrian texts"
As if it's just one of many texts who are similar to eachother.
If the sinaiticus is a forgery, did Constantine Simonides had access to the codex vaticanus to make a copy that would be similar? Or did he make both of them ?
If the 2 codexes are the only ones without Marc 16 and John 8. How could Simonides have known to make his forgery similar to the vaticanus ?
I'm not saying it's impossible, but I would need some plausible conspiracy theory to explain the origin of similarities with the codex vatinanus.
This means there need to be more people involved then just Simonides.
perfectly preserved lol
Good morning, two questions impose themselves after watching the video . 1st do this replacements, corrections and additions change the meaning of the verse ? Do they change/affect the general meaning of the Quran verses and the message Mohammed delivered ? İf so how ? To whom/ to what direction this changes -if exist -serve?
2. Why does the word Allah in particular being used and replaced changed ? Trying to make it appearing so much ? What is the reason ?
Thanks in advance .
www.answering-islam.org/Quran/Contra/
Dear sir,
You were kind enough to respond to a question of mine a short time ago.
I have been interested in this subject since the 1980s. It was considered, and is still considered, by many people as an odd thing to want to know about. So I hope you will answer another question.
Where and how why do you think islam developed? I know that's a rather big one.
One of my own idea's is that the Arab's probably saw the opportunity that was developing because of the Persian verses Roman war, and then created a framework to explain their meteoric success. The crass musings of a layman lol and only one of them I'm afraid.
Historically there was variant Quran even if we have no manuscripts to show: the variant Quran of Ibn Masood. If after the standardisation of the Uthmanic text everyone forgot all variant Qurans then why was it spotted, 300 years later after Ibn Masood, and documented by ibn Nadim in his book Fihrist? Here is a hadith proving there was a variant Quran th-cam.com/video/oJR7AkWHr7A/w-d-xo.html and th-cam.com/video/5f8yH50wS2o/w-d-xo.html
Is this proof that some of the quran where really some Christian scriptures made on arabic that was,used as foundation for creating a new religion?
Thank you for exposing lies and revealing truth once again! Please keep up the good work and be blessed
I appreciate your work. Im doing my second B.A in Religious Studies so this does help me understand this topic better since it requires a lot respect and professionalism.
Unveiled: companion of Muhammad tells us that chapter 113 and 114 are not part of the Quran th-cam.com/video/IvVUwApQjKY/w-d-xo.html
If i understand you right sire.
The earlist quranic manuscripts have corections in it to fit the new hafs quran.
Moder corections.
@liveevil34 Here's the Sidki paper: www.academia.edu/40931921/Daniel_Alan_Brubaker_Corrections_in_Early_Qur%CA%BE%C4%81nic_Manuscripts_Twenty_Examples_Lovettsville_Think_and_Tell_Press_2019_
I've never know this kind of studies exist before. I've been searching for it long time ago. You help me a lot Dan.