I love the boost a little, cut a little of contending track advise. Also "feature" EQ is awesome! Makes so much sense. I totally dig your bands music too!
Must say your vids are a great help. I'm on a meager setup with some decent (albeit a tad bass heavy) monitors & mics. Getting my levels & freq's to "play nice" in a mix is always a challenge. Learning to mix in mono first, & know the subtle ways to EQ has made life alot easier & enjoyable: ) Thank bro! Hope you get well soon!
It's interesting to me how when you'd frequency sweep, you'd often settle on frequencies I wouldn't have chosen. You clearly made the right choice based on how they sounded at the end, but there's definitely a high degree of subjectivity involved. I'm sure your ears are better than mine at this point.
at 12:55, where you're bypassing the three guitars, if you hold down 'option' and 'command' before clicking just one of the inserts, you can bypass the entire row across all tracks. You may already know this, but thought I'd mention it in case you don't ;)
Thanks for the great video! I wish I could see you working on some metal distortion guitars too. I don't know what to do with the EQ for low D damping. I guess I should just remove a lot of low end?
Really nice tutorial Graham, good job! I know you're trying to keep it viewer friendly, However, you should might try to tweak the gain +- a few dB after deciding to use the 3dB preset, just in case the specific track you EQ at the moment sounds better with a higher or lower cut.
If you hold control+shift while clicking on a band it isolates that band and allows for much easier notch filtering. Doesn't blow out your ears plus 12ing at 3-6k
Great! What about EQ and Comp guitar signal in FX processors like Fractal Axe or Line6 Helix? This is a common problem in a lot of guitar rigs around the world when a guitarist play live/studio
Do you do that to every instrument in your song? or just the instruments that you want to pop? i.e. if I use pads to fill space, do I use the boost a little eq on them or just my guitars and lead? I hope my question is clear. Thanks :)
could you show how you would mix and EQ an electric bass guitar, played in a Slap and popping style? I've heard that you can duplicate the original track 2 times and use the 3 tracks and EQ each differently. one track will EQ only the Lows and cut the mids and Highs, the second will get the Mids cutting the Lows and Highs, and the third track will EQ the Highs and cut out the Lows and Mids. that way you can get some of the percussive sounds to cut through from the slapping and popping, and still get decent bass tone in the track. feels unnecessary, but I think I got it to work for my track
Not every EQ has the IN and OUT meter, what is the recommendation when you can't gauge how much of a difference the EQ changes are making in the volume?
I use an Axe FX which has a number of 5 band EQs available at various sections of the signal chain. Where would you advise placing an EQ in your signal chain? Is it a good or bad idea to have a graphic EQ in your signal chain before ever reaching your sequencer? Am I putting bias in my tone by relying on a premixed tone?
I use an Axe daily as well in my studio. the parametric EQ at the end of your chain is KEY. depending on Genre of course but ive run into many circumstances where all it needed was the para eq at the end of the chain. ive found (personally) that less high end has helped me, at least when mixing metal. But its all a product of the song so it really just depends. if you have any questions as far as Axe goes, feel free to email me. landis@l13recordings.com
Great Video! I have a little doubt. You say that it is okay for the guitars to lose a bit of low end because the bass will cover it up. But what if we are mixing an acoustic song? How can we compensate for the lack of bass frequencies in the acoustic Guitar after such an EQing method where a little low end is lost? Thanks in advance!!
Hi there, I think you answered your own question in asking; try not cutting out all of the low end. I'd be interested to hear if you found another solution. All the best~
Everybody has preferences. If you prefer the vocal in a certain frequency, perhaps you shouldn't mis the guitars in those frequencies. If Graham uses a certain frequency range, that doesn't mean you have to as EQ is dependant on the sound of your guitar, which would probably be different to how his guitar sounds (you could have DI'd it and he might have mic'd up an amp).
vocals louder!? vocals mask guitars, not opposite, if you're boosting same (or even different) area on both and it's not working (panorama helps a lot in this case), pick up the most important element to the mix and move on!
You got some horrible answers to your question dude. Let me try to help. The heart of a guitar tone tends to fight with vocals somewhat and there's not a lot of EQing solutions for that. The standard solution - and has been for decades - is riding the fader. When vocals kick in, most guitar tracks will dip in volume. Sometimes they will drop more than 6db. This is usually setup using automation in your DAW so you can fade the guitar send/bus (on one track) up and down as needed. It's not an instant drop - but it's pretty quick. It will come back up if the vocals stop. Once you learn to hear it, you can easily detect the same thing happening on any commercial song. The same thing usually happens on a guitar solo as well. The other guitars will drop to let the right track obtain focus. You don't need to butcher a track with EQ if you can solve the problem with changing a track's volume.
+Stephen Harrell I know it's a year late, but your answer is very good. That technique is actually called ducking, and it's done quite a lot like you mentioned. I believe a lot of engineers will side-chain a compressor on the guitar to the vocals to do just that.
Graham, what's your opinion on using a low shelving eq versus entirely rolling off the low end in some cases? The way you demonstrate in your tutorial is how I've always typically worked as well but lately I've pondered if a shelving eq might be more musical sounding? Opinions?
maybe my opinion is worth something as well...i almost never use the low shelf filters. i feel like either you have a bass or kickdrum track and then you wont want to take out any low end, or you have all the other instruments which usually dont need these frequencies, at least when you have a bass. now im thinking if you had an acoustic song with just a guitar and vocal or so I might consider not to cut out bass but rather just lower it with a shelf. end of the day though your ears decide whats best... so try it out and let me know what you found out :)
Wasnt looking for a blueprint, I typically work this way as well - was more curious to see what Grahams pros and cons would be when approaching cuts this way... Obviously use your ears and theres no cookie cutter one-way approach to every song....
This may be just from my personal favoring, but on that acoustic the mid-high frequency at around 3k sounds a bit much of an unnatural twang on it. I would have gone a bit more around 5k but very informative nonetheless brother!
I noticed you had a wonderful sound, my bass sounds like crap, please give me some pointers on some good bass tones or how to get it to sit in the mix well.
Bass di is usually the best way to go. Even in a huge studio you'll find the DI is the main bass tone while amps and what not just add grittiness that you either do or don't want for the style of song. I'd still always record the bass amp even if you don't want to use it so that the bassist feels more badass while recording. So I guess the answer to your question would be to just get a totally badass DI box and run it through a totally badass preamp. Good luck!
If you're looking for a good bass sound, roll back on the bottom end and tone, then bring them up until it suits the song/sound you're looking for. Then to add presence and power to the instrument, use a compressor setting a slow attack and set the release; fast for a busy song/slow for gliding notes. Ratio around 2 and adjust threshold to control the amount of attenuation. Adjust output to compensate for volume. With a slower attack, you will get less scratchiness from your strings and it will sound over all smoother. It will also help taming the volume of your instrument while giving it presence.
I have a quick question. Where should guitar solos fall in the mix? For instance, I have my rhythm guitars panned hard left and right, I put the leads in the center. Is this considered to be an acceptable panning? Or should my leads be panned as well? This is a metal track that I am talking about.
Always use your EQ and boost the EQs that sound awful, then you'll attenuate those frequencies. Start wide band and close it up to find that frequency.
I personally, would cut stuff in solo (muddy low mids, maybe 2k a bit to smooth it out a bit), but not boost. I would boost if I had to bring out something in the mix... Basicly fix the found in Solo, and enchance it in the mix. But if he was just starting the mix... I guess it's a good start point. Fix all of the sounds in solo, make them as good as you possibly can, and then start compromising and making changes to fit better in the mix... And I guess you can always EQ in solo, then see if it works in the mix by bypassing the plugin... Plus you can always identify the kind of sound you're looking for in the mix, then go ahead and solo the channel and EQ it according to what you have in mind. Solo can be a really helpful tool when making those subtle moves (3db or so). It's nearly imposible to hear them with the whole mix playing. So it's almost necessary. But if you end up soloing every track without listening to the mix and turning up the same frequencies on every single one of them... The mix is going to collapse.
I totally agree with you. I just think that's what we should say. Start with solo and then enhance and double check in the mix. I love Graham. I just don't want anyone to be scared of eqing in solo.
Jerry Romero NO!!! never eq in solo! You should always know EXACTLY how you are affecting the balance of your mix! A "bad frequency" in solo might be making the vocals sound cool. You just can't know for sure in solo so its ALWAYS a bad idea. I'm sure he just did it so the viewers could hear better but I still think that was wrong of him and he should teach people instead how to hear the differences with the whole mix playing. YOU SHOULD BE SUPER SCARED OF EQING IN SOLO CAUSE IT WILL BITE YOU IN THE ASS! I speak from experience of clients asking why the vocals sound so thin and after hours of trying to make the vocals sound better I just decided to start from scratch and all of a sudden they were much fuller because I had gotten rid of some frequencies somewhere that were helping it. No one will hear you guitar in solo so it doesn't matter WHAT SO EVER how it sounds in solo...just make it work in the mix...Thats all I can say...make...it... work..in...the...mix......... :)
Did you just solo a track then EQ it?? Ballsy xD How do you know what frequencies are bad unless you are hearing how they effect the rest of the mix? My mentor would of slapped my hand with a stick if I tried that shit. When EQing to make guitars "pop" lets say, I'd just play the song and fuck with the knobs until they popped. Simple as that. Usually involves a high pass filter, a cut around 350 and then either a boost somewhere nice or just a slight volume increase. I know thats basically what he did but at least my way you have direct knowledge of how its affecting your mix either in a good way or a bad way so that you aren't working in the wrong direction for too long. I also mash that bypass button like a mother fucker. There is no excuse for it to ever sound worse when the EQ is engaged. As soon as you can engage the EQ and be somewhat happier with the sound just move on right away, don't fret, you made it slightly better and you can return later if you really need to. The more time you spend EQing the less perspective you'll have and the worse your mix will be. You should have gotten the sounds you wanted during tracking so there should be no complaining at this stage otherwise you've done it all wrong and you should probably go sit in a corner and think about what you have done. Mixing is strictly balance just remember that. Every move you make should be for creating a better balance....then you can fuck with crazy effects :D
![[MIRRORED] LISA - ROCKSTAR 🎸 MV version #LISA #BLACKPINK #ROCKSTAR](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/-U58DuCCtZk/mqdefault.jpg)
I love the boost a little, cut a little of contending track advise. Also "feature" EQ is awesome! Makes so much sense. I totally dig your bands music too!
One of the best tutorials on guitars in the mix I have watched. Well done!!!
That was a really good EQ tutorial. Those guitars really had more clarity and space once you added the subtle EQ. Great stuff as always. P.o.p.
VERY helpful. Thanks for taking the time to put this together!
Thanks so much for all the great info. Just getting our home studio up and running.
Blessings to you, your family and your music.
I needed eq assist and got taken aback that ur sick..whew..good thing it ws 6 yrs ago and not 2020. God bless u n ur fam. Stay healthy.
Hi Graham, Thanks again mate, you make it sound too easy, Im glad im part of the RRevolution :-)
Bro, thank you so much.
After years of frustration, I finally understand what EQ is and how to use it properly.
yet another super informative video, thanks a ton
Must say your vids are a great help. I'm on a meager setup with some decent (albeit a tad bass heavy) monitors & mics. Getting my levels & freq's to "play nice" in a mix is always a challenge. Learning to mix in mono first, & know the subtle ways to EQ has made life alot easier & enjoyable: ) Thank bro! Hope you get well soon!
Thank you Graham! Totally awesome tutorial, very helpful. I paid for your mixing course, and I'm enjoying it too.
Great video once again. Very informative and at a pace I could digest. Thanks for sharing your talents and skills with the rest of ys. God bless!
Man .... this video is incredible. I learned so much in so little time. Kudos 👍
Dude you rock! Your videos are so informative and you have helped me with so much. Thanks!
This is just perfectly balanced. Well done !
bronchitis and pneumonia? aint nobody got time fo dat
The 3 dB tip is really good, thanks for sharing your knowledge
helped me out a lot! thanks!
I love the maag EQ4, it's the best you can get for 'air' boosts, highly recommended for mastering and dull sounding tracks
Love this. Thanks for the great material.
amazing men!!! thank you!! all your tutorials are great!
Those drums sound awesome!
Thank you Graham. Extremely helpful!
another great tutorial mate, thank you, get well soon!
best eq tutorial i evern seen man ty a lot!
Love this dude! Very helpful!
great video! super helpful.
Very clear and helpful!
Man, thanks for your awesome videos. There`s always something new to learn.
Excellent. Everything i know i learned from Graham! \m/
Oh man that bass is mixed quiiiite nicely ;)
3dB...Great work!
This was really helpful
Nice video. Hope you and your wife get well soon man, God Bless ya!
This guy, Awesome!!! Thank you
Great video!
It's interesting to me how when you'd frequency sweep, you'd often settle on frequencies I wouldn't have chosen. You clearly made the right choice based on how they sounded at the end, but there's definitely a high degree of subjectivity involved. I'm sure your ears are better than mine at this point.
Great video yet again Graham! Quick question, I loved your snare and kick samples in the track, where are they from?
at 12:55, where you're bypassing the three guitars, if you hold down 'option' and 'command' before clicking just one of the inserts, you can bypass the entire row across all tracks. You may already know this, but thought I'd mention it in case you don't ;)
Thanks for the great video! I wish I could see you working on some metal distortion guitars too. I don't know what to do with the EQ for low D damping. I guess I should just remove a lot of low end?
That 3.0 dB boost does WORK.
Great video can recommend some plugin suites work well with garageband 10
Really nice tutorial Graham, good job! I know you're trying to keep it viewer friendly, However, you should might try to tweak the gain +- a few dB after deciding to use the 3dB preset, just in case the specific track you EQ at the moment sounds better with a higher or lower cut.
Nice tips! Thanks :)
If you hold control+shift while clicking on a band it isolates that band and allows for much easier notch filtering. Doesn't blow out your ears plus 12ing at 3-6k
In for a good watch- thanks for the effort on the video looking forward to it despite the sick household
Thank you so much!!!
Great video thanks :)
Hope you'll get well soon
Great! What about EQ and Comp guitar signal in FX processors like Fractal Axe or Line6 Helix? This is a common problem in a lot of guitar rigs around the world when a guitarist play live/studio
Damn, that bass guitar sounds awesome. How did you record that sir? Thanks for the tuts
Hope you & your family are well & getting better (protect the girls :). A very helpful video, esp. for those of us who are engineering novices!!!
great video ! .. would love to hear the whole track. who is the artist ?
Great video, Graham! :) Why don't you low pass (high cut) the instruments, so they don't "fight" with the cymbals? Especially the electric guitars...
Great tutorial
Whats the SSLChannel effect you have on those tracks, under the EQ's? Sorry I'm really new to this.
Do you do that to every instrument in your song? or just the instruments that you want to pop? i.e. if I use pads to fill space, do I use the boost a little eq on them or just my guitars and lead? I hope my question is clear. Thanks :)
could you show how you would mix and EQ an electric bass guitar, played in a Slap and popping style? I've heard that you can duplicate the original track 2 times and use the 3 tracks and EQ each differently. one track will EQ only the Lows and cut the mids and Highs, the second will get the Mids cutting the Lows and Highs, and the third track will EQ the Highs and cut out the Lows and Mids. that way you can get some of the percussive sounds to cut through from the slapping and popping, and still get decent bass tone in the track.
feels unnecessary, but I think I got it to work for my track
Can I use the different EQ setting (when 2 guitars oppose eachother) in double tracked guitars?
use your ears, there is no rule, if it sounds good then it probably is
Finally gets to it at around 3:05
Great use of subtle mixing. Graham whats this groups name? Would love to listen to their music!
It's his own music. Title is "One Word". Album is the Tree EP. I think you can still get it for a small donation of your choosing.
Not every EQ has the IN and OUT meter, what is the recommendation when you can't gauge how much of a difference the EQ changes are making in the volume?
I use an Axe FX which has a number of 5 band EQs available at various sections of the signal chain. Where would you advise placing an EQ in your signal chain? Is it a good or bad idea to have a graphic EQ in your signal chain before ever reaching your sequencer? Am I putting bias in my tone by relying on a premixed tone?
I use an Axe daily as well in my studio. the parametric EQ at the end of your chain is KEY. depending on Genre of course but ive run into many circumstances where all it needed was the para eq at the end of the chain. ive found (personally) that less high end has helped me, at least when mixing metal. But its all a product of the song so it really just depends. if you have any questions as far as Axe goes, feel free to email me. landis@l13recordings.com
why not just hold shift and ctrl (shift windows key) and solo the band?
shall i roll off the 400 hrtz from all tracks ? whether it sounded nasty or not??
Great Video! I have a little doubt.
You say that it is okay for the guitars to lose a bit of low end because the bass will cover it up. But what if we are mixing an acoustic song? How can we compensate for the lack of bass frequencies in the acoustic Guitar after such an EQing method where a little low end is lost? Thanks in advance!!
Hi there, I think you answered your own question in asking; try not cutting out all of the low end. I'd be interested to hear if you found another solution. All the best~
You work so much in the regions i would typical mix my vocal. How do i drop a vocal in the mix with out it getting int he way?
Everybody has preferences. If you prefer the vocal in a certain frequency, perhaps you shouldn't mis the guitars in those frequencies. If Graham uses a certain frequency range, that doesn't mean you have to as EQ is dependant on the sound of your guitar, which would probably be different to how his guitar sounds (you could have DI'd it and he might have mic'd up an amp).
Huh?
vocals louder!? vocals mask guitars, not opposite, if you're boosting same (or even different) area on both and it's not working (panorama helps a lot in this case), pick up the most important element to the mix and move on!
You got some horrible answers to your question dude. Let me try to help. The heart of a guitar tone tends to fight with vocals somewhat and there's not a lot of EQing solutions for that. The standard solution - and has been for decades - is riding the fader. When vocals kick in, most guitar tracks will dip in volume. Sometimes they will drop more than 6db. This is usually setup using automation in your DAW so you can fade the guitar send/bus (on one track) up and down as needed. It's not an instant drop - but it's pretty quick. It will come back up if the vocals stop. Once you learn to hear it, you can easily detect the same thing happening on any commercial song. The same thing usually happens on a guitar solo as well. The other guitars will drop to let the right track obtain focus. You don't need to butcher a track with EQ if you can solve the problem with changing a track's volume.
+Stephen Harrell I know it's a year late, but your answer is very good. That technique is actually called ducking, and it's done quite a lot like you mentioned. I believe a lot of engineers will side-chain a compressor on the guitar to the vocals to do just that.
Graham, what's your opinion on using a low shelving eq versus entirely rolling off the low end in some cases? The way you demonstrate in your tutorial is how I've always typically worked as well but lately I've pondered if a shelving eq might be more musical sounding? Opinions?
maybe my opinion is worth something as well...i almost never use the low shelf filters. i feel like either you have a bass or kickdrum track and then you wont want to take out any low end, or you have all the other instruments which usually dont need these frequencies, at least when you have a bass. now im thinking if you had an acoustic song with just a guitar and vocal or so I might consider not to cut out bass but rather just lower it with a shelf. end of the day though your ears decide whats best... so try it out and let me know what you found out :)
Christopher Bonte I like that..."your ears decide whats best"...Thats the answer to almost every question a beginning mixer has
Wasnt looking for a blueprint, I typically work this way as well - was more curious to see what Grahams pros and cons would be when approaching cuts this way... Obviously use your ears and theres no cookie cutter one-way approach to every song....
This may be just from my personal favoring, but on that acoustic the mid-high frequency at around 3k sounds a bit much of an unnatural twang on it. I would have gone a bit more around 5k but very informative nonetheless brother!
I noticed you had a wonderful sound, my bass sounds like crap, please give me some pointers on some good bass tones or how to get it to sit in the mix well.
Bass di is usually the best way to go. Even in a huge studio you'll find the DI is the main bass tone while amps and what not just add grittiness that you either do or don't want for the style of song. I'd still always record the bass amp even if you don't want to use it so that the bassist feels more badass while recording. So I guess the answer to your question would be to just get a totally badass DI box and run it through a totally badass preamp. Good luck!
If you're looking for a good bass sound, roll back on the bottom end and tone, then bring them up until it suits the song/sound you're looking for. Then to add presence and power to the instrument, use a compressor setting a slow attack and set the release; fast for a busy song/slow for gliding notes. Ratio around 2 and adjust threshold to control the amount of attenuation. Adjust output to compensate for volume. With a slower attack, you will get less scratchiness from your strings and it will sound over all smoother. It will also help taming the volume of your instrument while giving it presence.
thank you very much I will give this a try.
***** thanks for evrything
I have a quick question. Where should guitar solos fall in the mix? For instance, I have my rhythm guitars panned hard left and right, I put the leads in the center. Is this considered to be an acceptable panning? Or should my leads be panned as well? This is a metal track that I am talking about.
guitars are generally panned hard left and right. Everything double tracked. If the lead is playing a solo it can go to the center during the solo.
Love you vids man but why not just make a video on EQ'ing stuff that's playing together instead of your ill-advised way of EQ'ing in solo?
Fab
Always use your EQ and boost the EQs that sound awful, then you'll attenuate those frequencies. Start wide band and close it up to find that frequency.
In the full mix I didn't much difference in the guitars but the bass WAY better.
i've got the rocking pneumonia and the boogie woogie flu.
Who is the artist?
What is this song ?
more!!! XD
is EQing Electronic music same as this dude is doing?
TH-cam is SATURATED with these lessons. No PUN intended.
missed an opportunity to say ain't no body got time for that
I couldn't hear any difference in that first acoustic example :/
I thought you said don't eq in solo?
He meant that you shouldn't usually, but he knows what the full mix sounds like, so he can.
I personally, would cut stuff in solo (muddy low mids, maybe 2k a bit to smooth it out a bit), but not boost. I would boost if I had to bring out something in the mix... Basicly fix the found in Solo, and enchance it in the mix.
But if he was just starting the mix... I guess it's a good start point. Fix all of the sounds in solo, make them as good as you possibly can, and then start compromising and making changes to fit better in the mix...
And I guess you can always EQ in solo, then see if it works in the mix by bypassing the plugin... Plus you can always identify the kind of sound you're looking for in the mix, then go ahead and solo the channel and EQ it according to what you have in mind.
Solo can be a really helpful tool when making those subtle moves (3db or so). It's nearly imposible to hear them with the whole mix playing. So it's almost necessary. But if you end up soloing every track without listening to the mix and turning up the same frequencies on every single one of them... The mix is going to collapse.
I totally agree with you. I just think that's what we should say. Start with solo and then enhance and double check in the mix. I love Graham. I just don't want anyone to be scared of eqing in solo.
Jerry Romero NO!!! never eq in solo! You should always know EXACTLY how you are affecting the balance of your mix! A "bad frequency" in solo might be making the vocals sound cool. You just can't know for sure in solo so its ALWAYS a bad idea. I'm sure he just did it so the viewers could hear better but I still think that was wrong of him and he should teach people instead how to hear the differences with the whole mix playing. YOU SHOULD BE SUPER SCARED OF EQING IN SOLO CAUSE IT WILL BITE YOU IN THE ASS! I speak from experience of clients asking why the vocals sound so thin and after hours of trying to make the vocals sound better I just decided to start from scratch and all of a sudden they were much fuller because I had gotten rid of some frequencies somewhere that were helping it. No one will hear you guitar in solo so it doesn't matter WHAT SO EVER how it sounds in solo...just make it work in the mix...Thats all I can say...make...it... work..in...the...mix......... :)
Thanks buddy. I should clarify I do some eq in solo mainly to work on disturbing frequencies and then I do most of the eq in the mix.
Hey Graham,i'm a producer from Germany and i would like to hear your mix of my instrumental.If you are interested holla at me! Stay safe!
kopa
First. NOO ONE CARES IF YOU'RE FIRST.
Bronchitis and pneumonia doesnt sound so promising 6 years later aha ha ha
Did you just solo a track then EQ it?? Ballsy xD How do you know what frequencies are bad unless you are hearing how they effect the rest of the mix? My mentor would of slapped my hand with a stick if I tried that shit. When EQing to make guitars "pop" lets say, I'd just play the song and fuck with the knobs until they popped. Simple as that. Usually involves a high pass filter, a cut around 350 and then either a boost somewhere nice or just a slight volume increase. I know thats basically what he did but at least my way you have direct knowledge of how its affecting your mix either in a good way or a bad way so that you aren't working in the wrong direction for too long. I also mash that bypass button like a mother fucker. There is no excuse for it to ever sound worse when the EQ is engaged. As soon as you can engage the EQ and be somewhat happier with the sound just move on right away, don't fret, you made it slightly better and you can return later if you really need to. The more time you spend EQing the less perspective you'll have and the worse your mix will be. You should have gotten the sounds you wanted during tracking so there should be no complaining at this stage otherwise you've done it all wrong and you should probably go sit in a corner and think about what you have done. Mixing is strictly balance just remember that. Every move you make should be for creating a better balance....then you can fuck with crazy effects :D
Nice tips! Thanks :)