Creo Parametric - Creo Simulate - Failure Index and Effective Communication

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 9 ส.ค. 2019
  • This Creo Parametric / Creo Simulate tutorial video shows two different methods to communicate structural analysis results to your audience more effectively:
    * Changing the legend in your results window to reflect the yield stress of your part's material.
    * Modifying material properties to include a Failure Criterion and then generating Failure Index plots.
    For more information, visit www.creowindchill.com.
    If you learned something from this video, please give it a thumbs up. If you like this video, please click the Subscribe button to be informed when new videos are uploaded. Also please write a comment if you would like to see more videos like this.
    Feel free to share or embed this video, and add it to your playlists.
    Creo admins, you can share the Creo Parametric channel with your users as a training tool:
    tinyurl.com/CreoParametric
    Thanks,
    Dave
  • วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี

ความคิดเห็น • 19

  • @gasmimohamedbaha559
    @gasmimohamedbaha559 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    This is an awesome video. Thank you Dave !!!

  • @kamleshkailasjoshi2620
    @kamleshkailasjoshi2620 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Martin sir, you save my day, what a knowledgable video

    • @CADPLMGuy
      @CADPLMGuy  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Glad to hear it, Kamlesh!

  • @adhithasimhanraghavan7516
    @adhithasimhanraghavan7516 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is the one video that is gonna make my career! I dont have words to express gratitude Dave..

    • @CADPLMGuy
      @CADPLMGuy  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Glad to hear that! Trust me, the lessons were hard-earned through a lot of frustration and embarrassment.

    • @adhithasimhanraghavan7516
      @adhithasimhanraghavan7516 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@CADPLMGuy I can see how much effort has been put into your CAD management and Engineering journey.. wish I had a teacher like you in my Engineering classes! 💯💯

    • @CADPLMGuy
      @CADPLMGuy  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@adhithasimhanraghavan7516 That's a great compliment. Thank you!

  • @snackiefood5570
    @snackiefood5570 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you for sharing, its very useful

    • @CADPLMGuy
      @CADPLMGuy  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Glad it was helpful!

  • @nabeelk
    @nabeelk 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is it possible to get the part file to work on it following your video ?

  • @maciekszymanski5671
    @maciekszymanski5671 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi there, I have a question, so actually after first analysis your results showed that the maximum stress is 610MPa and Ti alloy has a yield strength on a level of 880MPa. The conclusion was (obviously), that your part has a lot of spare strength and that it is going to withstand this force. Then, after second analysis where instead of stress your results showed failure index, same places (which previously where the places where the stress was on the level of 610MPa) had the value of failure index greater than 1. It means that they could (or even for sure are going to?) brake, am I correct? So basically, first analysis said that our part will be ok but second said that it will actually brake? I don't know whether I missed some details beetwen first and second analysis, maybe that's the reason. Could you please help me with this?

    • @CADPLMGuy
      @CADPLMGuy  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I did this video last August, and it was more than a hundred videos ago. I doubt I could remember what I was doing. Although I seem to recall adding some safety factor to the yield strength when I reconfigured the material properties.

    • @The.Wonderful.Inspiration.Of.
      @The.Wonderful.Inspiration.Of. 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I think he show us the second type of load in the index failure results ;) So more loads = more stresses

    • @adhithasimhanraghavan7516
      @adhithasimhanraghavan7516 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      In the first run, he ran with the default settings for material selection. Then, he added 704 MPa and I probably think that is where some other variables have also changed slightly. May be he has shown study-1 the first time and study 2 results the second time. I am not sure about either of those.. just to add my guess..

  • @AlfraRed
    @AlfraRed 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Interesting, do you ever set the stress-strain response to anything but linear, or is linear usually good enough?

    • @CADPLMGuy
      @CADPLMGuy  11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      You use a non-linear stress-strain response when it's appropriate for the material, like a hyperelastic or elasto-plastic material, especially when you are simulating "push-through" (like you see with a kid's push pop fidget toy).

  • @Timepass_guys
    @Timepass_guys 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sir, my doubt is I m getting 2200MPa in vonmises criterion. But the yield stress of steel is 260Mpa. Is this right ? Should I assume my material will be failed or should I think I have made some mistake? Will creo simulation show more stress than ultimate stress ?

  • @simranjitsingh6047
    @simranjitsingh6047 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can we find factor of safety in creo?

    • @adhithasimhanraghavan7516
      @adhithasimhanraghavan7516 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Failure index is the inverse of factor of safety. Pls divide 1 by the max value you get in the failure index plot.