@Dougie the "real" return is actually closer to 2% on your premium, as we stated. But can we agree that neither a 2% long-term investment NOR a 20% credit card are good ideas and we should look for something better? Thanks for watching! -- P
It should go without saying, but if you don’t have any dependents or anyone relying on your income then you don’t need any kind of life insurance (assuming you have a net worth sufficient to cover your final expenses).
Even if you invested that $15 every month for 60 years, you still wouldn't reach that at 7%, so I don't even know how they make money. Maybe they are assuming that everyone is going to live 70+ years after you started.
Would it even matter if you didn't have the net worth sufficient to cover your final expenses? The municipal authorities will cremate you on their dime anyway. Not like they'll leave your corpse outside for the vultures lol
@Bryeana Rhodes I mean, sure, you could, but life insurance isn't meant to be a payday for people that survive you. It's meant to provide for dependants. If you have no dependants, you're probably wasting money by buying a policy.
@Bryeana Rhodes If it were really a steal, do you think the insurance company would offer it to you? They do a lot of complicated statistics to make sure that they make a profit on the average investor. Term life is generally worth that penalty if you leave survivors who depend on your income so they can pay off a mortgage or set up a trust fund. But if you don't have that, do yourself a favor an put that $15 into an index fund where it will make you a profit that either you or your survivors can enjoy in the future!
It’s true, but irrelevant. The net amount at risk in whole life insurance is the insurance. The cash value is the savings/investment portion which pays off the insurance (which is why these things endow). If you think about how it works, it’s not lousy at all. It does exactly what it says on the box. What people don’t like is the difference in hypothetical projected returns between an equity fund and a whole life policy. When someone tells you you could earn 8% in the stock market, it’s an excellent excuse to save less money than if your projected return is 2% - 5%. In both cases, the returns are projected but are treated as if they were either guaranteed or “reasonably certain” to happen. That is not the case but once you bring it up, it’s anchored in a person’s mind.
I used to sell insurance for a bit. I started doing it because I wanted to get out of used car sales because selling people cars for more than they are worth felt unethical and the dealership I worked at was all about lies that lead to commission. Leo me tell you, Financial advisors are generally more shady than used car salesman. They tell bigger lies and they ruin people's whole family future just to make a buck
Another name for what Tamera did in this video is BTID: Buy Term, Invest the Difference. Term insurance IS cheaper since there is no investment component (where there are fund managers in place to manage that, and of course there are fees, like in Tia's case). Awesome video, you killed it in the commercial Philip! 🤣
Insurance salespeople are so sleazy. When my wife and I bought this farm 10 years ago, we decided to take out a life insurance policy to cover the cost of it in case I died. We sat down with an insurance agent and she started in on lifetime income, kid's college costs, etc. She recommended over 2 MILLION in insurance! I put the brakes on and said the premium was far beyond what we could afford. Her response? "Don't you want to be sure your family is comfortable?" My Response -"I'm not a lottery ticket. We want this much (much smaller amount) insurance. If you don't want to sell us this much, we're done here." She acted like I was the worst kind of bad husband and parent for not going with her amount. She obviously was trying to play with our emotions to get more sweet, sweet premium money. And that was only one of the parade of scumbags that tried to sell us more than we could afford.
I understand your feeling @farmerboybill I was once that sleazy Insurance salespeople. The reason we got into this mess of selling this product was due to our desperation for cash. After all that, I had decided to leave the industry and do something else and give an honest opinion and to guide others like @Two Cents on how personalized each family personal finance independently!
I hope you told her to get out of your house.....the only thing you need is term! when someone tries to sell a whole life.... RUN!!!! The extra money you have should be invested, saved or whatever! but I wouldn't waste money on whole life!!
I had an insurance agent do the same exact thing to me. Our circumstances are diffrent, but the pitch about taking care of my wife after I'm gone was thrown in the conversation.
My mom was on the verge of buying Whole Life Insurance, which included an "attractive" payout after some time has passed. I literally only had to make some simple math to realize that it was worthless. Mom didn't buy the policy.
One thing they forgot to mention in this video is that salesmen and saleswomen for whole life insurance will approach you as a "financial advisor" and then they recommend a whole life insurance policy as part of their investing. When I met up with a whole life insurance agent I was under the impression that he was going to show me how to better my financially position instead of just trying to sell me on something that I didn't really need.
I first heard about this on an investment course from a guy who left FA company mainly because he hated the practices of pushing to sell whole life insurance to everyone. That guy became my personal FA that day :)
@Erik , bruh, 24k p.a. is a very good wage in Czech republic. That's why many Czechs go to Eastern Germany, because it's cheaper and salaries are higher. Even in Sachsen 🙂
Former life insurance salesman here. Only did it for 6 months. Even in training they don’t teach you how bad you’re scamming the people you’re selling to or really what it is you’re selling. They barely teach you the “good parts” of it. Took me a couple of months and getting my friends and family signed up for it that I began to realize what a horrible scam it was. I convinced all of my friends/family to cancel and just get basic term insurance with a different company. I stopped taking meetings after 4 months and actively looked for a different job the last two months. This video is amazing and I’m so glad that they showed easy and simply what a scam it is. Awesome job 2 Cents!!
Devere I only was a salesman for 6 months because unless except for a small percentage of the population, IUL or whole life is a scam and a money waster for a majority of people
Adam Duggan if you think Universal Life (which is a scam) and whole life are the same, you learned nothing about life insurance. The worst part is that people like you just give us a bad reputation. Whole life insurance is the best financial tool (not investment) in this country. If you didn’t do your job correctly it’s your problem, not the industry.
@@luisuribe5457 Wow. There is no indication that would suggest he doesn't understand the difference between IUL and whole life insurance. Learn to read, YOU are giving your profession a bad name. What exactly - other than your premiums - makes whole life insurance "one of the best financial tools in the country"? And you have to agree that in the example put forth in the video whole life insurance makes absolutely no sense whatsoever, right?
Ralph Körner tax advantage, guaranteed contract, liquidity and velocity of money, tax free dividends, death benefit for pennies on the dollar, internal rate of return of 4%. It’s all about a well designed policy, if this guy was selling IULs with those MLM companies is not a surprise that he think life insurance is a scam, I started with them, but if you do your homework you’ll find out soon that whole life policies save many people during the 1929 crash, maybe you heard about J. C. Penney, and you my find out that banks dump billions on whole life policies, do you think they would do that if it were a scam??, life insurance is the best way to transfer wealth from one generation to other tax free.
This is accurate. I’ve always been an advocate of investing in the stock market because it has paid off handsomely since I decided to invest in it. Great video.
You can’t overlook the fact that it’s paramount not to get greedy but remain invested by careful study, take chances and most importantly remain patient in the market.
@@Halllaand The dangers can be curbed once you invest with a reliable FA. You are pretty hands off other than the routinely monitoring of the market. You can divest as long as you have a trustworthy broker guiding you through your trades. I trade with Clemans and I’ve not had any reason to complain because I’ve been able to make returns from my investments.
He has absolutely changed the game I don’t know if this was meant to be, but coming across comments here, getting paid today for the month’s trading cycle 🙏🙏 Is the premium service here to stay permanently?
Thank gosh this video took a turn towards the end! I was thinking this was in support of whole life at first. Another thing about whole life policies is that your beneficiaries typically won't receive the cash value of the policy if you die during the term (it usually ends at 100 years old, so it's technically not even whole life) and will only receive the death benefit. The cash value goes right back to the insurance company you bought from, meaning you just paid for really expensive life insurance. And one other negative is that you often have to pay interest to the insurance company if you withdraw from your cash value. Most people wouldn't be willing to pay interest to a bank in order to withdraw money from your checking account until it's replaced, so it doesn't really make sense to do it for the cash value portion of whole life insurance either. Awesome video!
This is 1000% the truth. I am licensed to sell accident, health, life and fixed annuities in Pennsylvania. I no longer practice due to a bad overall experience and untrustworthy coworkers. Also, commissions goes for everything that I would sell. Don't let insurance companies push you around make your own choices and take the time to think it out.
I use to work for one of the top insurance companies and sell Whole Life and Term as well. And this video nailed it! I would receive 100% commissions for Whole Life, and almost nothing for Term. This lead to several unethical practices of the majority of people pushing only Whole Life even when that was not the best Financial advice for the customer. I quit after 6 months because of these unethical practices. The best thing you can do is talk with Financial Advisors who do NOT receive commissions, but work only on a hourly rate.
Every time you say "whole life" and "investment" in the same sentence, I cringe. It would result in an insurance producer losing their license in most/all states.
I went to a free financial ''class'' (a few hours for a couple of days only) and they went on and on about life insurance and almost 0 info on other forms of investing... I was disappointed, to say the least. -.- Thank you for clearing this up for us all
I subscribed to you guys channel a few months ago, and I always loved your information! Today when I saw the title of this video I was very intrigued. As an insurance agent my self, I felt that this video is where I could test you guys knowledge, and see if you really knewwhat ya’ll were talking about. I have to say I AGREE with this video. I always educate my clients before I offer them any insurance, similar to the educational approach of this video. I will make sure to show this video to my associates and clients. Keep of the good work. This channel and Dave Ramsey’s are my favorite Financial TH-cam channels!
Thanks Dimensions -- you're one of the few insurance agents that wasn't peeved by this one! I also sold insurance for years, and I know ALL the arguments of why WL "isn't a scam". Our job is to educate, and offer as unbiased a view as possible. Glad we didn't get the facts wrong, thanks for watching!
I saw a financial advisor 5-ish years ago at Northwestern Mutual, and he sold me a whole life policy. I just did whatever he recommended. He said it was good for when the market is down during retirement, and it was the right time to start one since I was young. I’ve been having my doubts lately though. Thanks for the video. I’ve been debating whether to cancel the policy and put the difference in an index fund. The sunk cost fallacy has held me back, but I’m leaning more toward cancelling.
You guys are actively changing peoples' lives for the better. I hope you think about that if you have a rough day. Thanks for sharing your two cents with us.
0:03 - The name of the movie is My Name is Trinity. It is a Bud Spencer and Terence Hill movie, and they are famous only in my country which is Hungary. It was surprising to see here :D
Actually it's an italian Western movie. The main actor (Terence Hill, the one slapping super fast) is still active and nowadays plays a priest in an italian tv fiction (Don Matteo)... Anyway I was surprised to see it here too!
@@no.7711 Actually is was socialism that made the college degrees price skyrocket. Or do you think that if was government didn't make loans they would cost this much?
Wow, this is amazing! Thank you so much. You guys rock. I was very tempted to get whole life insurance when I sat down with a financial advisor. I thought about through the whole (no pun intended) process and thought to myself that I could just use the extra money that I'm saving with my current term life insurance policy and just dump it in a mutual fund. Now, thanks to you guys, it looks like I made the right decision. Thank you!!
I'm sad you guys didn't mention the difference between a Fiduciary and a FInancial Adviser! A LICENCED FIDUCIARY must ALWAYS act and recommend IN YOUR BEST FINANCIAL INTEREST, NOT THEIRS.
My licensed fiduciary recommended an whole life insurance policy. It was technically in my benefit as 2% is better than 0 or negative returns and it is a "tax advantaged account". They did reveal they made commission on it, but only after I specifically asked. I had to do my own research to realize there were many pitfalls, among them, if I ever stopped paying my premium (I had an unstable income), I'd end up mostly just paying for insurance. That was bad for me, because I had no dependents and the policy was meant to be purely an investment! A "licensed fiduciary" is at this time, just another tool to help make the sale. It is not any protection for the consumer. I've only done a cursory search, but I could not find any instance of a licensed fiduciary being brought to court and being significantly penalized.
I sold life insurance for a year. I spent the summer researching what type of return you can expect and what type of competition is out there. A couple points -it is nearly impossible to get accurate data if you are the public. I am convinced they design these policies so you do not research them. -Only two companies that I know of sell whole life insurance that I could consider to be honest and pay a REAL dividend. 99% of companies that do sell this are scamming you. -The 99% of companies who sell Whole Life quote a huge dividend like 10%. BUT they take out expenses of the company from YOUR dividend. Most companies pay that 1-2% you were talking about. -Lastly it is Tax free if you the consumer pays for your policy. Not tax deffered which is only if a business pays for it. Oh! One last point. Having some whole life insurance is good for market dips when you are retired. But please talk to a financial advisor about this. Overall great video and you got the main points!
@@stewartcharles I worked for Northwestern Mutual and they paid the highest only matched by USAA. But your representative is a huge component of this as well. You can easily get taken advantage of.... Its very complicated but something you should look for is Additional Premium. There is a lot of circumstances but if your whole life policy does not have additional premium you may be taken for a ride. Whole life policies come with large commissions however additional premium is almost nothing and is beneficial for the client. Look for it as a gage for trust. If you really want to get into it nearly all whole life policies should have a plan in place to hit that limit before it turns into a MEC or modified endowment contract. Make sure it MECs before you retire. You shouldnt have to worry about life insurance payments when you are pulling from your investments. If you want more info let me know. I no longer work in the industry so I do not have any conflicts of interest
Alex Howard Thanks for the response. I asked because I was curious in what you've seen. I've actually been a financial planner at NM for about 10 years now. I'm a little surprised to hear that USAA's IRR was matching NM or beating any of the other major mutual companies. I agree that it depends on the advisor (I made a recent comment on this video). The piece about average rate of return being at 2% is not even the case for average mutual companies.
I totally agree, the advisor has to set up a policy that will pay him less if he does Additional premium (we call it OPP or paid up additions) and that maximizes the clients’ money and reduces the commission. You must have a trustworthy advisor to get these rare policies.
I'm someone who believes in the buy term invest the difference mentality, but whole life can be a decent option for people who don't have the discipline to do that. i see it as a if you struggle to save your money and like to spend it all, go whole life. if you can properly financially plan, go with term
I never really understood life insurance before. The way Dave Ramsey explains life insurance and what it's supposed to be for helped me grasp the concept
@@astroman30 not only that, the rising cost of insurance eats into your cash values. The speculative illustrations that they use to sell UL are misleading, you need IN-FORCE illustrations to see just how bad the policy truly looks over time
Yes! I used to pay all my bills ahead. I sat down with a financial lady at church and she told me some things I didn’t want to hear. Basically if I can’t budget my normal bills On my month to month income I would hurt myself paying bills with tax money.
How about adjust your W-4 with your employer so that money comes to you in your paycheck each week? Why would anyone give an interest free loan to the government when they could use that money to help fund their 401k or Roth IRA?
Back in time, when they offered me this kind of insurance, I kindly refused because I didn't trust a legal entity to own my money for such a long time... probably wrong reason, but definitely right choice :) Thanks Two Cents, I just stumbled upon your channel and I love it!
When I went to invest my first ever savings of around 2000$ I was sold a ULIP plan which had a lock in period and it was 2000 per annum for 5 years!!!! I was naive with no financial education!!! What you’re doing is very important and I genuinely thank you for it
True. With an MLM, look at how the money is made. If it's made by selling products, you might be okay. If the real money is made by getting people to sign up and pay membership fees, training, or buy large amounts of inventory up front, then it's likely a racket.
When exiting the military. We were required to take classes about applying for jobs etc. One of the “teachers” literally told us to get Whole Life Insurance because: “you’ll get the benefit at age 72, with term you get nothing at age 72” Luckily I saw the difference in premiums and dodged that bullet
I got convinced to sign up for whole life when I was like 20 years old. The agent did not mention that a portion of my monthly payment was not going into the investment aspect, but rather to fees. He made it sound like the entire payment was going towards an investment account. Sure, ignorant of me to think that, but he made it sound like it was a no-lose deal, so I bought it. Cancelled a year later when I saw my first annual summary and how much was going to fees.
David Tran this is a foolish cancel depending on the company. Whole life insurance is like owning a house you pay the mortgage/fees upfront and you end up with liquid asset in the end. With New York Life for instance you pay fees for about four years coming from your premium and once that clears it goes towards the cash value and death benefit growth. Basically you bought a house at full price and then sold it at a third of the price a year later. Not smart
Travis Nelson i think the agent must have done a poor job explaining that. But the investment piece is there. It’s a guaranteed growth and it should have been apparent in the illustration that the CV would take a couple years to accumulate.
I’ve been a Dave Ramsey follower for eight years and am now completely debt free including my home. I like your videos. They explain both sides to each topic. Keep it up.
@@heinaye3594 Hein Aye we bought it for my mom and me when I was very young. It was a cash value whole life insurance. Turns out the premium was very much higher for me as well as my mom. If I would have taken the term insurance then my coverage would have been very high as compared to the coverage whole life insurance provided. To my knowledge, plans we were offered were all the ones which would give you the money back with some interest over the years (cash value) and the salesperson told us that it was an investment and we would get back high return and we should buy it because of money that we will be returned was way higher.
@@dhavalchheda1626 ahhh gotcha. Sounds like it was a dishonest insurance salesperson. In general though, you can lock in a cheap premium for whole life when you're young and you can potentially stop paying premiums in your 30's or 40's with paid up premiums.
great advice guys, put all your money in stocks, live through volatile years, lose money in retirement in the down years - clearly you don't understand the value of having 'some' money in whole life - you already own bonds, why not improve on that return?
Becoming a financial advisor in the next few weeks here. Michigan. I definitely make sure to do my research on term life insurance. I love this and it motivates me to not only learn but make sure I’m doing what’s best for my clients. The money will come if I’m putting their needs first.
Awesome Keep it going! The whole life insurance idea is to hedge against any debt recurring especially in your mortgaged property. It is rendered useless if you are debt free! Heck if I were to protect my family, I'd rather invest in a medical policy with the insurance company!
@@littlegeo1 simply put a protection against your house debt. If anytime that your life is gone, the debt will be passed down to the next person to payoff the debt. That term life is a partial protection to payoff that debt in cases of anything happen to your life.
5:34 I have one small question about these numbers. The final value of their policies should neither of them die is as shown in this timestamp. However, Tia's policy never expires so that death benefit of $500,000 is guaranteed to be paid as a result. Hence, if say both of the sisters die at aged 70, then wouldn't the $500,000 death benefit payout bump Tia's life insurance value to $774,077 vs Tamera's $619,780, making the whole life policy quite worth it for their dependents or descendants?
I could be wrong, but I believe the cash value is given to the insurance company upon your death. Your beneficial will still receive the entire death benefit though, the 500,000
But term and invest the difference can and does work for people. One thing I’ve noticed in my short career, is that my younger clients all say whole life is terrible and they would rather buy term. And then the older clients will say they regret buying term and wish they bought more whole life lol. That’s not to say whole life is the only or best insurance to buy, but it is an interesting observation to think about. I guess it just proves that one size does not fit all.
I've been looking for life insurance for myself recently and talked to an agent who was adamant about whole life and said she even had a whole life policy herself. I could tell it was a total sales pitch but decided to hear her out, and it was basically everything that was stated in this video - premium never changes, you'll be covered your ENTIRE life, dividends.... But I'm glad I did my own research beforehand, because when I reinvest the difference, I know it'll be worth more than the whole life policy in the end, AND I feel like I'm on track for a retirement savings so I don't have to depend on a whole life insurance policy. Great video!
I am a licensed financial advisor and I don’t have a whole life policy on myself nor would I ever recommend this to a client. If an agent/advisor offers you a whole life policy, run the other way.
You wouldn't recommend this to a client because you don't understand the value of building capital, you don't think long-term, and you have faith in markets that are heavily manipulated and prone to crashing, as well as a currency (the US dollar) whose value is being inflated away at a record pace. Maybe if you took the time to do any research at all on whole life, you would have a different perspective, instead of dismissing it out of hand.
@@theAppleWizz You clearly have no idea how cash value life insurance works. You shouldn't speak from ignorance. Also, if you think that the market and real estate will always go up, then you don't understand why that is happening or why it is unsustainable. I suggest you educate yourself before making these ridiculous claims.
@@moriendus bro this a whole video on why whole life is a stupid idea. This is why people like Warren Buffett buys out gullible people at 80 90. If you can’t handle a 30% market drop just say that but that does not mean the cash value is anything more than just a marketing ploy. Just so you know the insurance company has been investing your money and making 10x what you will ever get.
@@theAppleWizz This video has factually incorrect information and therefore draws invalid conclusions from that bad info. It also doesn't address how someone can actually use the cash value in the policy. I know that the cash value isn't a "marketing ploy" because I have cash value and have financed things in my life with it. I can tell you don't understand whole life insurance because you think the insurance company is "making money off of me" and you fail to understand that a MUTUAL life insurance company is owned by the policyholders. If the insurance company makes money, then I make money as an owner of the company. This is what dividends in life insurance are. As I said, you need to do actual research on the subject instead of listening to the fake gurus who made this video because they either lied or just didn't know what they were talking about as they just made blatant factual errors.
If you've been in the industry for a decade and you can't refute misinformation like this, then quit. That it's on PBS, is shocking. They're just simply not correct in a number of ways, it just not this simple, if it was then everyone would be the same, all companies would be the same, all products would be the same, there would be no need for the heavy regulation that insurance companies and the agents that work for them MUST adhere to, at least I'm Canada. The information is at best incomplete, definitely misleading, but it suits a narrative and fear based/bias based "newsyish" faux journalists seem to get more views. Of course they make nothing if you don't watch.
@@sjonas8777 I actually work with our legal team on compliance and regulations. You live in Canada....much, much different. Before you go insulting people you should know the subject matter at hand. But assholes like you feel the need to pipe up on EVERYTHING you disagree with on the internet. I would normally wish anyone well, but you can fly a fucking kite. Insurance is very complex, and I suppose it is unfair to expect someone of your likes to understand it. But this was a very comprehensive presentation meant to give people the basic principles of the different kinds of policies so they can be a bit more informed on their own. Agents are in no way required to explain the differences - they just get to earn the commission. Enjoy your miserable life trolling good people on the internet!
@@lizswank7239 you say I'm insulting, yet I never swore nor did I put people down or call them "trolls", rarely do I comment and certainly even more rarely in a negative way. If you are indeed in compliance then you would realize, basically am saying exactly what you said that insurance is a complicated business, and that this simple video does not do it justice. You will think whatever you think, and you're overreacting continues to make me glad to be Canadian, if you ever come up, I will treat you and your spouse to dinner then ,I will meet the real you and have good conversation about things we can agree on, there is likely many more of those than you would believe.
My coworker bought this as an investment strategy, as recommended by her agent, and keeps encouraging me to it too. Glad I watched this first!! Thanks a bunch! I learned from it
This video would have helped me 2 years ago before I got a pushy "financial planner" that practically forced whole life insurance on me. After a lot of work I managed to cancel it. Hopefully this video can help other people make more informed decisions than past me.
My wife and I just did term until our house is paid off incase one of us died and had to take care of the kids we wanted to be financially secure. Took the extra money and throw it in investments every month instead, no need for whole life, once kids are old enough and homes are paid off its no longer needed really.
I had a couple of friends who had been trying to sell me VUL. I think they believe in the product (and yeah commissions too) because in order to become an agent, they had to have one themselves. I I have to decline over and over because I don't take advice from people with conflicts of interest. If financial gurus with nothing to gain says term and invest the rest, then yeah, that is what I am going to do should I have a dependent in the future.
Whole Life Insurance is not an investment .. and shouldn’t be sold as one. In the state of FL it’s illegal to sell it that way and any agent can lose their license.
Can you make a part 2 that goes into borrowing from this Whole Life Insurance rather than a normal bank? Say they both take the same loans out that are the average loans that people take. And then include the age of average death to see how the return on the $500,000 fits in since 1 expires. Maybe even start from age 30 and go to 80ish. And also show a chart of when investment in 1 overtakes the other (if at all)? That would be awesome.
Borrowing money from yourself and paying interest is never a good idea. Any money borrowed plus interest is taken off the face amount in the event of a payout of the face amount.
One financial advisor made the argument to me that with a standard index fund, because of fees at whatnot, you’re real annualized expected interest per year is like 4ish percent over long periods of time. And therefore recommended the insurance policy. I noticed that over the last 30 years, there was a 7.8% annualized average boost in the snp 500 (but this might be higher than it should be because were likely nearing the end of a cycle); how much of this is lost to fees?
Invest in Vanguard and their fees are incredibly low. There is probably somewhere with insanely high fees, but clearly this person was just giving you advice that would help themselves.
I've seen companies show that the death benefit increases along with the cash value. And what about the direct recognition vs the indirect recognition when it comes to borrowing from a policy?
I have objectively studied the numbers and have tried to explain to so many people that whole life is not the way to go however I am left with a lot of frustration :(. Even with videos like this, people make their own choices with how they spend their money
@Exoplanet Research Yep. The death benefit is tax-free, while estate taxes can run up to 40 percent. Once the estate tax provisions of the TCJA sunset, we're back down to a much lower exemption. Ouch.
The other thing these guys totally miss is how these policies are actually constructed in the field. For example, hardly any 20 something is ever going to be sold a 500,000 pure whole life policy. It's going to be something more like a $50,000 permanent death benefit and a $450,000 term rider, which allows the policy owner to put a lot more premium in, up to the MEC limit, to build cash value much faster. After x number of years, the term goes away (as does the cost of continuing that term insurance) but the cash value, including a bunch of dividends paid along the way (if it's a participating policy) will support a much higher permanent death benefit than the 50,000... and continuing to earn dividends tax free, which can be withdrawn tax free if you no longer need the life insurance. That and you can exchange it for a lifetime income annuity if you like without having to pay capital gains tax (or ...if it's in an IRA, ordinary income tax). I don't think whole life policies are for everybody. They're frequently oversold. But for people in high tax brackets, with illiquid estates, estate tax concerns, probate concerns,or asset protection concerns, they can be terrific. These are people a lot of 20-something and 30-something financial reporters who never sign the front of a paycheck don't understand, and aren't writing for.
@@jasonvansteenwyk5984 I'm sure the no one watching this video will have estate tax problem tho lol. Very very few do. Even if you're rich enough. Your death benefit is in your gross estate so it'll get taxed at 40 percent unless you have ILIT...
@@ksmoothy28 Expand your thinking. People watching this video are unlikely to have an estate tax problem NOW. However, they may well have estate tax concerns (and asset protection concerns) 25, 30, 40, 50 years from now. After their term insurance has expired, and they have a successful business, a comfortable home, maybe some other rental properties, accumulated stock, etc. And who knows what the estate tax exemption will be then... especially the way younger voters are breaking for Sanders. If that trend continues, we may well have a very low estate tax exemption at some point in the future. Meanwhile, yes, your death benefit would be in your gross estate IF you own the policy in your own name. But people with estate tax concerns are going to use ILITs. Meanwhile, trusts can't own IRAs. So you can't move any wealth in your IRAs, etc. out of your estate. It's trapped there. Don't get me wrong... I'm a YUUUUUUGE fan of term... especially with shorter terms, like 1 year and 5 years. (People selling 10-20 year term on a BTID concept don't quite understand their own system, or they're trying to goose their commissions, too). I'm also a HUUUUUGE fan of index investing. But people in high tax brackets, with successful businesses, significant real estate, real asset-protection concerns, etc. are playing a different ballgame than W-2 folks working jobs... even if some of those jobs pay pretty well. It's a different mindset. A lot of online content and financial journalism doesn't get that. What's good advice for a schoolteacher isn't going to be great for the guy who owns a chain of tire shops, a general contracting company, or a good-sized farm, and vice versa.
I got talked into this scam and lost 5k. I didn't know anything about investing so I was an easy target. After cancelling it, I Invested in Tesla and made 60k the next year. Not a fair comparison, but there are better investments out there.
Sad part of this video is that they left out that Tia has probably around $400-450k of death benefit over the top of the cash value. However, if you buy whole life to have your cash value compete with investments, you are doing it wrong and will be disappointed, which they do address. Lastly, IRR on good WL policies are typically 3-4%. So higher than shown, but do not compare with long term investment returns.
I made a call to Dave Ramsey about this. The video is called Aunt and Uncle $5,000,000 mistake. I couldnt talk my aunt and uncle out of it, but showing a video of Dave Ramsey talking to me about it sure did. One thing you forgot that I think is important is people with whole life think their dependents will receive the cash value along with the policy. Thats false, the insurance keeps the cash value, they only get the policy.
I was in the mortgage business for awhile and 98% of the time, reverse mortgages do NOT make sense for the client. There are far better ways to utilize debt if you absolutely have to.
I have 3 policies, all whole life should I cancel them and keep 1 or cancel all 3 and get term. Term is scary because I'm 38 even if I get a 30 yr term what happens when I turn 69 and term expires
@@ebo7310 you def should rewrite your three policies into one get money back from your cash value that you have built up and with the 3 policies into one it will make the premium cheaper as well as have less hassle for your beneficiaries because they wont have to put in three different claims to get money
me personally think term is a scam because statistically terms never pay out there face amount due to it having to expire and with medicine nowadays most live past there term
also more often then not what term is really good for is the fact that its cheap and get high face amount but the use of that is lets say you have multiple properties and also a business your able to get a term and have a high face amount to pay for all the assets u left behind while having a cheap premium but thats honestly one of the only good reasons other than that its whole life all the way you dont need a 100k whole life 20k is more then enough to pay for a proper burial and with just 20k as a face amount your premium will be very low (of course based on age and health) but assume you have good health and ur 38 you would only be paying 42 bucks a month while building cash value an other things along with that people dont really know benefits of whole life so sorry i ranted on this thread but had to be done
My husband and I just entered our 40s fretting over not having a life insurance policy in place. Thank you for sharing this insight. We're late in getting our act together, but just in time to start making smarter financial decisions.
One thing I guess you guys are missing that Tia still has death benefit of $500k against Tiamera who has nothing as a death benefit to protect the beneficiaries. So basically Tia still has approx $774k while Tiamera has approx $650k. If Tiamera decided to continue with new Term policy at the age of 70, she might need to pay lefty monthly premium. Also, for me and my wife, we both pay $1800 annual whole life premium and we are 29 years old. We would need to pay it until next 20 years which would be total $36000 each and we are getting $41000 cash value at that time (death benefit is always there). Cash value would increase as the years pass on and beneficiaries are protected by death benefit. What do you think about this scenario and did we make good choice to go with whole life insurance against the term life insurance? Amazing video and keep it up!
We ladder up here: 20 year term, five years later - another 20 year term, repeat. We have three terms going on me right now @ about $750,000 total and is good till I reach 75 (slowly dwindling to that point). All of them allow me to switch to a whole if I desire. However, we also have our IRA, which we will expand on and put money into, apart from whole (which would be a last scenario option). I agree with the video: Term, ladder up if you can, and look into any sort of portfolio to increase that compounding interest till you retire (or longer). Awesome job, guys.
For those who are curious; it all depends on your health and age. But, throughout my laddering (from 35-45 years old), I have a 20-term+, another 20-term+ and now a 30-term+, totally $750,000 and only pay about $130/month. Which may seem steep for some. However, if I die before any of those expire, my family gets three-quarters of a million dollars. A good trade off for a little over a hundred a month. If someone stuff the same amount of cash in their pillow to reach that payout, it would take them over 480 years to acquire it. So, in short, term life is a good safety net to have. It is not a get rich quick scheme; it is there as security for your family, if anything should happen to you.
Oh my gosh I'm so happy this came up in my recommended. I was at a loss for words as to how to explain this to my husband but. Now I can just be like, "watch this! This! Thisthisthis!"
Please Julia this youtube is very generic and takes nothing about the persons needs wants and desires. Did they mention that over 92% of term policies never get paid out as a claim? If this person was a licensed salesperson they would be fined for calling Life Insurance an investment..Just my two cents. Plan carefully. Something is wrong here. If this is what you are using to make BIG decision for you and your family, your making a big mistake.
So if I understood this video correctly, term insurance is like a contingency plan on life until one can build enough wealth to cover funeral expenses + dependent costs? So when term life insurance runs out in 20 or 30 years, you’re not insured anymore?
Yes! But if you aren’t disciplined and actually save you’ll be up a creek. That’s why I have an increasing term. I’m insured all the way until I’m 80 if I want to keep it that long. Just in case I get sick or something and wouldn’t be able to buy more insurance when I need it.
I’ve been working in the insurance industry for several years and started with a life insurance company. What I find shameful is “experts” using their personal opinions to sway people one way or the other. This was not an objective view. It was merely another opinion that as usual fell short of the full picture. Both term and whole life insurance serve their purpose depending on the circumstances. The reality is not everyone can afford to buy term and actually invest the difference. The other issue I find ridiculous is only acting as if there’s only the options of term and whole life insurance. There are multiple types of term insurance as well as permanent insurance that consumers should be educated about. In the end, a decision should be made based on the circumstances including but not limited to affordability, age, health, family situation (do you have small children?) assets, liabilities, and final expenses. I often recommend a combination of both depending on these variables. Bottom line, speak with someone who can offer more than opinions based on their own views and experiences. Find a trusted advisor who’s has the ability to understand you personal circumstances and advise accordingly with your best interest in mind.
@@Marcustrismegistus That still doesn't solve the issue. The premiums will be higher, the cost of insurance goes up annually until the cost of insurance is exceeds the level premium. Then the Automatic Premium Loan Rider kicks in, eat all the cash value and the policy lapses even before the client can blink...
@@SpasticRocks may be true if it’s level cash value meaning the cash value can never exceed the life ins amt. if it’s increasing cash the life insurance grows bc the cash value exceeds the amt your covered for. I own a couple of indexed life and they’re pretty much on track to what illustrated at 8%. These policies can later be switched to level death benefit when you take out money for retirement or what ever you need lowering the cost of insurance.
@@Marcustrismegistus Question is how much is the monthly premium? I'm sure the cost is 6-8 times of term. Buy Term and Investing the difference yourself would yield better, if not more ideal results. You may be getting 8% returns, however how much of that is eaten up in fees? For the average person in the US, they don't have insane estate planning needs, so Cash Value policies make no sense for them. Most of the information I'm sharing is cause I'm a licensed agent and there's plenty of books that share the same message. I'm not bashing against the product. It has its uses for certain people, but in the interest of most people, selling them a whole life policy that they don't understand and overpay for is not the right thing to do. This is why most people don't trust insurance agents or companies!
@@SpasticRocks my premium is pretty low since I got them when I was around 25. They used to say big term and invest the difference and before in the 80’s and early 90’s sure. You can pretty much use a dart throw it on the wall and what ever stock it landed on you can make 12-15 returns. The fee part maybe true on whole life but not IUL. The total cash value I’m supposed to have by 65 is 4-5 times more than what I invested with cost and fees. If I buy term and invest the difference, let’s say I buy a term rn to cover my exp, wages, kids school etc. I’d prob pay $120 for 1 mil coverage. If I get it now at 34 at a 30 year term. I invest the difference, where am I gonna get 8%. I’m only getting that on the iul bc it has a cap and a floor strategy which I don’t loose money and caped at 15% return. On investment if I make 10% and have it on risky investment the total fees are around 3%. Total return 7%. If I loose 7% the next year, guess what? They still charge me the acct fees, agent fess, etc. -3%+ -7% return = 10% loss. Let’s say I accumulate a measly 1million by retirement. My term expired. If I want to transfer wealth guess how much my premium is going to be? 1,500 a month. Bc as you said yourself? Cost of insurance goes up as mortality goes up. I’m have couple of securities license, life and health in different states. I’m sure you’re very well educated in the subject as am I. I’m a Certified Financial Educator and just have to pass the certification to be a Certified Financial Planner. I’ve been a professional at this for almost a decade.
Liscensed financial advisor and insurance agent here. You're onto something with the commission bit, like a lot. But I would also point to policies for young people and children. The premiums are often inexpensive the younger you are. That's why I would have loved to have heard a bit on the insidious side of "grow up" policies for small children/babies. Personally I think whole life can be a viable option for retirement in the right set of circumstances for the right person under the right balance of premiums to payout. But undercutting that, usually it's not.
Love your channel 2cents. I am glad there is at least one other pro-whole life insurance policy person here. I got a whole life policy mainly because of the protection if gives you from creditors. I work a job where there is a decent chance I am going to get sued one of these days. Earning 7% on zero dollars = zero dollars at the end of the day.
Jedidiah Young for the right person whole life is a good option, typically the younger you are the more time you have to pay into it, when I worked with it we never treated it as an investment, more so as a savings plan. People get fussy with slow growth when it can be a stable asset that takes a long time to grow.
@@danielshen5349 it has to be for the right combination of cost/reward. Term life as a strategy means you might be rewriting policies frequently (once every 10 yrs). Cash value is not the main selling point it's a secondary strategy. The main thing I see is locking in a good rate and helping people get set with their financial future. It's not a silver bullet but it's a good tool.
Yes it is. I have designed children policies that often are difficult to keep from MEC’ing just because the returns are so high early and cash value accumulation is also high. I like to always illustrate the ACTUAL rate of return, and when designed properly you get high 4% low 5% close to MECing. A 1000/mo (150k total contribution) 15pay starting age 1 gets 2.5mil in retirement at age 65. If they wait another 15 years at age 80 they will have 4.5 mil. At this point it makes more sense to have annual cash value surrender/loan of about 100-125k/year (65 to 70), !tax free! which is not a bad retirement, even accounting for inflation. It is in fact several times more than what you’d get from a similar contribution from Social Security. The highest return policies are 5-pay but it also requires a lot of free cash, this is why the wealthy park some their money on these for their children. But again it’s life insurance with living benefits. Not a replacement for investments.
@@MasterFallenHero It also largely depends on the company offering the product. I was surprised at the average return of 2%. Mutual companies pay more into the cash value. I also think its not made to be compared to the market. It's a lower return with less risk. I think it's safe to say that with an expected higher return, you can expect a higher risk. They should have compared this to a CD or High Yield Savings account
So I've been considering Whole Life insurance but not for the investment opportunity, but for the Infinite Banking Opportunity (I invest in other ways). So I really wished you could have elaborated more on whether that aspect of it was a good idea. Would taking out a loan against your life insurance to buy things like cars or other large ticket items be a better source than a standard loan and are there any downsides to it. For me, the whole life wouldn't be an "investment" arm so much as just life insurance WITH a savings account attached. If I'm already putting $500 in savings a month (using your example) wouldn't it be worthwhile to use a whole life insurance as a savings arm instead of an investment arm?
olandir No. If the savings is your money, why would you have to take it as a loan? Buy cheap Term and invest the difference in a Roth IRA. Also with Whole Life there is only one pay out.... either the death benefit and the insurance company keeps the cash or you get the cash which likely has about a 2% return and the policy is canceled. If you borrow from it you have to pay it back with interest either way. If the idea of taking money out of your own savings account and it being treated as a loan with interest seems stupid, Whole Life is exactly that.
its not worth it at all. invest in realestate if you want take a shot at the silverbullet. you can take out loans based on the value of your real assets.
Tia has 200,000 tax free that she can collateralize so her 200,000 keeps growing at 4-6% even is she takes out loans against the policy. If she does this in retirement she has income that does not increase her total taxable income. She could have set up a policy that only required her to make 5-10 payments so even though the policy never expires she does not need to pay for her "whole life". The value of her account can never go down. She also has half a million dollars that will go to her beneficiary tax free. Tamara has 600,000 that she has to pay tax on so really she has $400,000. As she spends the money she stops getting a return on the money spent. The vale of her account can go down. She has also taken on a risk called sequence risk. If the market has a few bad years in the beginning of her retirement it can significantly reduce the amount of income she will have for retirement. The order in which she gets her returns can add to the depletion of her account. Neither account by itself is going to be enough to get the sisters through their retirement. But if Tia uses her financial tool while she is alive to be efficient in paying for the major costs of life it will open up funds for her to put into a second account. Tamara doesn't fully understand this and she can never use the money in her account to be efficient in other areas or else she risks not maximizing the return her chosen account can provide.So Tamara goes through her whole life thinking she has made the right choice because her account will have a bigger number on her retirement day. Little does she understand, like most people using her method, that bigger number does not equal more money to use in retirement.
I have been watching tons of videos trying to understand more about whole life insurance and whether it makes sense. This is definitely the best one. Thank you Two Cents.
BunkMasterFlex77 I’m a Northwestern Advisor. I actually love it! I may show it to my clients. The only thing I will say is if you run the numbers using our policies (lowest cost of insurance in the business) it’s much more comparable. Plus, I never recommend it as a primary investment. Merely as a compliment to investments. It makes a great alternative to other fixed income assets (bonds or cash) and is especially useful for reducing market exposure. (No downside risk.)
@@ksmoothy28 in defense of Riley, NM has custom built, qualified whole life policies that are paid up in as few as 7 years, and pre-packaged whole life policies that complete payments in as soon as 10 years.
Watching this I'm surely glad I went for simple life insurance for €40/month rather than (something like) whole life which in my case was "only" €50/month first year but in 40 years I would end up near the €400/month range (and how would I be able to afford that when in 40 years I'd be pensioner? And no I didn't calculate the price further that was enough for me). But the idea of investing the difference seems like a good choice :)
Term life is the same for the whole term-then it can go up, because the original premiums were based on your risk during that time frame. That's why you select a term that lasts until it is no longer needed to pay off debt or take care of descendants-then you drop it.
Their conclusion doesn’t make sense, they did not include the death benefit the sister will leave her loved one (tax free). So her total $274,000 + 500,000 (her family will get) =$774,000. It doesn’t mention that Tamara will have to pay taxes of 35%. So out of $619,000 ($200,00 +in taxes ) so approx less than $ 400,000. They are biased, and miss informing their viewers.
You didn't mention the worst thing about the whole life policy that Tia bought. Let's say she dies when she's 69 years old. Her beneficiary receives the $500,000 death benefit as agreed, but the $270,000 investment cash value that she built up in her account is lost. The insurance company gets to keep it. This, in my opinion, is criminal.
@@dakotadak100 Semantics. They're owed whatever the agreement says they're owed. I'm not saying they're violating the terms of the agreement, I'm saying the agreement itself is ridiculous. Tia paid about 10 times (or thereabouts; I don't feel like watching the video again) what she would have paid for a term policy with an equivalent death benefit because she understood that there was some amount of money that's hers as some sort of "investment." That's why she bought it; there's no other reason to buy whole life. But when Tia dies, the "investment" is gone. If everyone understood this, no one would buy whole life.
I've been wrestling with this for the past month. I've had a whole life policy through Northwestern Mutual for the last four years, and this video and conversations with friends have made me start to rethink it. I met with my financial adviser from NWM earlier this week to talk through it. He said of course he'd do whatever I said regarding the policy, but he wanted to talk about why I'm rethinking it. His main argument in favor is that it's a shelter from bear markets during retirement. He acknowledged that it doesn't grow as efficiently as an index fund or something similar, but he said the savings from pulling money from the cash value instead of a market-related fund in retirement during a bear market can be huge. He showed some graphs and sent me some materials to read over. It's all pretty overwhelming for me. I'm digging in, but I don't feel like I have the background to make the decision. Is there any validity to that argument? I don't have an dependents, so the insurance component doesn't mean much for me. I've already maxed out my IRA and am putting money in a brokerage account, so this is more of an extra thing he recommends as protection during a recession. Any advice on how to validate the accuracy of the bear market shelter stuff and how to determine if that's worthwhile?
@@NateGreensides Thanks for the input! From what I understand from what my FA told me and what the Whole Life paperwork says, after age 65 I quit paying the premium. From there there's a guaranteed cash value and an estimated cash value based on estimated dividends (which my FA says is slightly low-balled). The insurance payout includes a base amount plus cash value, so what gets paid to my beneficiary includes a guaranteed amount plus part of my remaining cash value, as I understand it. My FA mentioned annuities and other options that work for bear market protection as well, but he recommended the whole life policy because of the dividends and the tax benefits. He also said that this policy is different from a lot of the whole life policies out there. He said that most of them are crap, but this type of policy is the OG whole life, not one of the newer models. I don't remember what terms he used specifically. What he said made sense to me, but I'm still thinking about getting a second opinion from a fee-only FA.
@@NateGreensides Thanks for the insight. I do not live in CA, but this is helpful for informing my conversations with my FA. According to my paperwork, the premium will never go up. I also have a document that shows what the policy looks like each year. The insurance payout column starts at the base amount and increases as the cash value increases. That's what my FA meant by the two being combined. I'll ask for clarification, though. The annual premium column stays the same until age 65, when it goes to 0. There are two cash surrender value columns, one that is guaranteed and another that adds in potential dividends. The guaranteed column is always slightly higher than the total premium paid column, but it continues to increase even when the premium stops at age 65. The cash value column with potential dividends is significantly higher (almost double) the guaranteed.
I've been putting around 500 a month for over 5 years now. With covid19 my unemployment was stuck and I had the plan pay for itself for a month. I've taken out quite a few loans on the policy and it's been quite helpful. I now have a son and it's good to know that even if I never pay back the loan the death benefit still pays a large sum minus the loan amount. Buying into stocks fluctuates a lot and buying these days when the market is up (falsely imo) is quite risky. Overall I'm happy that I'm doing the policy and also have other investments that have higher risk but I can count on the policy.
I can’t speak to the individual integrity of your FA, but he has a personal relationship with you, knows your needs, and can be held accountable for his advice. Those other sources can’t. I recommend sticking with your FA if he’s trustworthy and gets good results.
Thank you for this video, this also applies to variable life insurance but its worse since they transfer the risk to the insured. Term and Invest are the best!
It’s very simple. Will you need life insurance for your whole life? You shouldn’t! Life insurance is to insure yourself when others depend on you. If you’re the breadwinner and/or your family depends on your income, you should be insured. But do you plan on having others depend on you for the rest of your life? When you retire you probably won’t need life insurance since you should have a retirement fund to take care of you and your spouse. your kids might already be out of the house but if they’re not they too can benefit from your retirement savings.
I sold life insurance for years and this is totally accurate! Well done! People need to know this information.
Heyoooo!!! Thanks for the vote of confidence. ; )
Bob Harper Agreed!
Bob Harper salespeople are the best to be around!
@Dougie the "real" return is actually closer to 2% on your premium, as we stated. But can we agree that neither a 2% long-term investment NOR a 20% credit card are good ideas and we should look for something better? Thanks for watching! -- P
Jazmin Bautista also is the 7% before or after taxes?
It should go without saying, but if you don’t have any dependents or anyone relying on your income then you don’t need any kind of life insurance (assuming you have a net worth sufficient to cover your final expenses).
TRUE THAT FRIEND
Even if you invested that $15 every month for 60 years, you still wouldn't reach that at 7%, so I don't even know how they make money. Maybe they are assuming that everyone is going to live 70+ years after you started.
Would it even matter if you didn't have the net worth sufficient to cover your final expenses? The municipal authorities will cremate you on their dime anyway. Not like they'll leave your corpse outside for the vultures lol
@Bryeana Rhodes I mean, sure, you could, but life insurance isn't meant to be a payday for people that survive you. It's meant to provide for dependants. If you have no dependants, you're probably wasting money by buying a policy.
@Bryeana Rhodes If it were really a steal, do you think the insurance company would offer it to you? They do a lot of complicated statistics to make sure that they make a profit on the average investor. Term life is generally worth that penalty if you leave survivors who depend on your income so they can pay off a mortgage or set up a trust fund. But if you don't have that, do yourself a favor an put that $15 into an index fund where it will make you a profit that either you or your survivors can enjoy in the future!
Tia and Tamera, huh? 90's kids for sure.
DUH
Math checks out
Bet gen z kids think it's a doja cat reference
Sister Sister 🙌
I thought that was a doja cat thing. Well I am a gen z
There's an old saying: "Investments make lousy insurance and insurance makes a lousy investment".
Lyle G I agree. Both have their place
It’s true, but irrelevant. The net amount at risk in whole life insurance is the insurance. The cash value is the savings/investment portion which pays off the insurance (which is why these things endow). If you think about how it works, it’s not lousy at all. It does exactly what it says on the box.
What people don’t like is the difference in hypothetical projected returns between an equity fund and a whole life policy. When someone tells you you could earn 8% in the stock market, it’s an excellent excuse to save less money than if your projected return is 2% - 5%. In both cases, the returns are projected but are treated as if they were either guaranteed or “reasonably certain” to happen. That is not the case but once you bring it up, it’s anchored in a person’s mind.
You’re listening to people who can’t even run the numbers right. They never mentioned the death value of the whole life policy at the end.
Gavin L this is a valid point. As the cv increases, so does the db
@@gavinl4388 the scenarios considered are both examples living till the expiry of the policy
I used to sell insurance for a bit. I started doing it because I wanted to get out of used car sales because selling people cars for more than they are worth felt unethical and the dealership I worked at was all about lies that lead to commission. Leo me tell you, Financial advisors are generally more shady than used car salesman. They tell bigger lies and they ruin people's whole family future just to make a buck
THIS! Thank you for telling the truth about how greedy insurance salesmen truly are.
Another name for what Tamera did in this video is BTID: Buy Term, Invest the Difference. Term insurance IS cheaper since there is no investment component (where there are fund managers in place to manage that, and of course there are fees, like in Tia's case).
Awesome video, you killed it in the commercial Philip! 🤣
Lolz. Thanks!
Insurance salespeople are so sleazy. When my wife and I bought this farm 10 years ago, we decided to take out a life insurance policy to cover the cost of it in case I died. We sat down with an insurance agent and she started in on lifetime income, kid's college costs, etc. She recommended over 2 MILLION in insurance! I put the brakes on and said the premium was far beyond what we could afford. Her response? "Don't you want to be sure your family is comfortable?" My Response -"I'm not a lottery ticket. We want this much (much smaller amount) insurance. If you don't want to sell us this much, we're done here." She acted like I was the worst kind of bad husband and parent for not going with her amount. She obviously was trying to play with our emotions to get more sweet, sweet premium money. And that was only one of the parade of scumbags that tried to sell us more than we could afford.
Ugh. That's a horrible and all too common experience. Glad you knew what was up!
I understand your feeling @farmerboybill I was once that sleazy Insurance salespeople. The reason we got into this mess of selling this product was due to our desperation for cash. After all that, I had decided to leave the industry and do something else and give an honest opinion and to guide others like @Two Cents on how personalized each family personal finance independently!
I hope you told her to get out of your house.....the only thing you need is term! when someone tries to sell a whole life.... RUN!!!! The extra money you have should be invested, saved or whatever! but I wouldn't waste money on whole life!!
I had an insurance agent do the same exact thing to me. Our circumstances are diffrent, but the pitch about taking care of my wife after I'm gone was thrown in the conversation.
@@investingwithaaron9876 Why didn't you just continue selling and stop being sleazy lol
My mom was on the verge of buying Whole Life Insurance, which included an "attractive" payout after some time has passed. I literally only had to make some simple math to realize that it was worthless. Mom didn't buy the policy.
What math did you did exactly?
One thing they forgot to mention in this video is that salesmen and saleswomen for whole life insurance will approach you as a "financial advisor" and then they recommend a whole life insurance policy as part of their investing. When I met up with a whole life insurance agent I was under the impression that he was going to show me how to better my financially position instead of just trying to sell me on something that I didn't really need.
I first heard about this on an investment course from a guy who left FA company mainly because he hated the practices of pushing to sell whole life insurance to everyone. That guy became my personal FA that day :)
Great video guys, definitely something people should watch before sorting out their finances. Cheers!
Hey! It’s the plain bagel!
Hey! It’s the plain bagel
Hey! It’s the plain bagel!
Have you tried putting sour cream on the bagel?
Is it bay-gul or bah-gul
This channel motivates me to pay off my student loans.
Erik Not as bad as my friends, I owe $30,000.
I recommend you watch Dave Ramsey, he'll light your butt on fire until you pay off that student loan.
Everything you see around should motivate you to pay off your student loan.
@Erik , bruh, 24k p.a. is a very good wage in Czech republic. That's why many Czechs go to Eastern Germany, because it's cheaper and salaries are higher. Even in Sachsen 🙂
@Erik , ja, Sie (die Deutschen) sind besser als wir. Immer besser
Former life insurance salesman here. Only did it for 6 months.
Even in training they don’t teach you how bad you’re scamming the people you’re selling to or really what it is you’re selling. They barely teach you the “good parts” of it. Took me a couple of months and getting my friends and family signed up for it that I began to realize what a horrible scam it was. I convinced all of my friends/family to cancel and just get basic term insurance with a different company. I stopped taking meetings after 4 months and actively looked for a different job the last two months.
This video is amazing and I’m so glad that they showed easy and simply what a scam it is.
Awesome job 2 Cents!!
Devere yes, I helped sell them
Devere I only was a salesman for 6 months because unless except for a small percentage of the population, IUL or whole life is a scam and a money waster for a majority of people
Adam Duggan if you think Universal Life (which is a scam) and whole life are the same, you learned nothing about life insurance. The worst part is that people like you just give us a bad reputation. Whole life insurance is the best financial tool (not investment) in this country. If you didn’t do your job correctly it’s your problem, not the industry.
@@luisuribe5457
Wow.
There is no indication that would suggest he doesn't understand the difference between IUL and whole life insurance.
Learn to read, YOU are giving your profession a bad name.
What exactly - other than your premiums - makes whole life insurance "one of the best financial tools in the country"?
And you have to agree that in the example put forth in the video whole life insurance makes absolutely no sense whatsoever, right?
Ralph Körner tax advantage, guaranteed contract, liquidity and velocity of money, tax free dividends, death benefit for pennies on the dollar, internal rate of return of 4%. It’s all about a well designed policy, if this guy was selling IULs with those MLM companies is not a surprise that he think life insurance is a scam, I started with them, but if you do your homework you’ll find out soon that whole life policies save many people during the 1929 crash, maybe you heard about J. C. Penney, and you my find out that banks dump billions on whole life policies, do you think they would do that if it were a scam??, life insurance is the best way to transfer wealth from one generation to other tax free.
This is accurate. I’ve always been an advocate of investing in the stock market because it has paid off handsomely since I decided to invest in it. Great video.
You can’t overlook the fact that it’s paramount not to get greedy but remain invested by careful study, take chances and most importantly remain patient in the market.
@@Halllaand The dangers can be curbed once you invest with a reliable FA. You are pretty hands off other than the routinely monitoring of the market. You can divest as long as you have a trustworthy broker guiding you through your trades. I trade with Clemans and I’ve not had any reason to complain because I’ve been able to make returns from my investments.
@@Halllaand I’ll leave you his mail where you can write him if you don’t mind. Leviclemans@gmalcom
Once I got my feet wet and my confidence in my investments with Clemans grew, I adjusted my portfolio accordingly to make bigger bets.
He has absolutely changed the game I don’t know if this was meant to be, but coming across comments here, getting paid today for the month’s trading cycle 🙏🙏 Is the premium service here to stay permanently?
Thank gosh this video took a turn towards the end! I was thinking this was in support of whole life at first. Another thing about whole life policies is that your beneficiaries typically won't receive the cash value of the policy if you die during the term (it usually ends at 100 years old, so it's technically not even whole life) and will only receive the death benefit. The cash value goes right back to the insurance company you bought from, meaning you just paid for really expensive life insurance. And one other negative is that you often have to pay interest to the insurance company if you withdraw from your cash value. Most people wouldn't be willing to pay interest to a bank in order to withdraw money from your checking account until it's replaced, so it doesn't really make sense to do it for the cash value portion of whole life insurance either. Awesome video!
I wish they would have mentioned that.
The Sister Sister reference killed me. And Australians are scam artists. Got it lol
Definitely wasn't Australian
@A G Maaaate. Trust me. It wasn't an Aussie accent. A bad attempt - yes.
Australian accents are notoriously difficult for foreigners to imitate, so he did a decent job.
@@AlexanderRafferty just need to talk with your teeth closer to keep the flies out!
I didnt
This is 1000% the truth. I am licensed to sell accident, health, life and fixed annuities in Pennsylvania. I no longer practice due to a bad overall experience and untrustworthy coworkers. Also, commissions goes for everything that I would sell. Don't let insurance companies push you around make your own choices and take the time to think it out.
Thank you for your honesty. Too bad there are too many weasel salesmen lying to clients.
Short answer: Yes
Long Answer: Hell Yes
Sequency especially if you have kids
Though long answer, it can benefit some, but not most
I use to work for one of the top insurance companies and sell Whole Life and Term as well. And this video nailed it! I would receive 100% commissions for Whole Life, and almost nothing for Term. This lead to several unethical practices of the majority of people pushing only Whole Life even when that was not the best Financial advice for the customer. I quit after 6 months because of these unethical practices. The best thing you can do is talk with Financial Advisors who do NOT receive commissions, but work only on a hourly rate.
Every time you say "whole life" and "investment" in the same sentence, I cringe. It would result in an insurance producer losing their license in most/all states.
Exactly. The two are exclusive and this guy is incorrectly putting them in the same category and misguiding so many people
Exactly. The two are exclusive and this guy is incorrectly putting them in the same category and misguiding so many people
I went to a free financial ''class'' (a few hours for a couple of days only) and they went on and on about life insurance and almost 0 info on other forms of investing... I was disappointed, to say the least. -.-
Thank you for clearing this up for us all
I subscribed to you guys channel a few months ago, and I always loved your information! Today when I saw the title of this video I was very intrigued. As an insurance agent my self, I felt that this video is where I could test you guys knowledge, and see if you really knewwhat ya’ll were talking about. I have to say I AGREE with this video. I always educate my clients before I offer them any insurance, similar to the educational approach of this video. I will make sure to show this video to my associates and clients. Keep of the good work. This channel and Dave Ramsey’s are my favorite Financial TH-cam channels!
Thanks Dimensions -- you're one of the few insurance agents that wasn't peeved by this one! I also sold insurance for years, and I know ALL the arguments of why WL "isn't a scam". Our job is to educate, and offer as unbiased a view as possible. Glad we didn't get the facts wrong, thanks for watching!
I saw a financial advisor 5-ish years ago at Northwestern Mutual, and he sold me a whole life policy. I just did whatever he recommended. He said it was good for when the market is down during retirement, and it was the right time to start one since I was young. I’ve been having my doubts lately though. Thanks for the video. I’ve been debating whether to cancel the policy and put the difference in an index fund. The sunk cost fallacy has held me back, but I’m leaning more toward cancelling.
You guys are actively changing peoples' lives for the better. I hope you think about that if you have a rough day. Thanks for sharing your two cents with us.
0:03 - The name of the movie is My Name is Trinity. It is a Bud Spencer and Terence Hill movie, and they are famous only in my country which is Hungary. It was surprising to see here :D
Norbert Posta You are not the only one who recognized it. We - Hungarians - are huge fans of these type of movies :D
Bojler eladó.
Actually it's an italian Western movie. The main actor (Terence Hill, the one slapping super fast) is still active and nowadays plays a priest in an italian tv fiction (Don Matteo)... Anyway I was surprised to see it here too!
Only in Hungary? Nope! They are even more famous in Germany! XD
OK, let’s just say that many of us love movies with Bud Spencer & Terence Hill ;)
[Dave Ramsey, loudly, from the back of the classroom] YES IT IS
Marie K.
And next he yells “Sell the car!!!”
And then when he's asked a question about college debt and having kids while in massive debt, he grumbles about socialism.
And then in the next breath yells loudly "go deliver pizzas."
"Rich people are afraid of leaves, get a leaf blower!"
@@no.7711 Actually is was socialism that made the college degrees price skyrocket. Or do you think that if was government didn't make loans they would cost this much?
Wow, this is amazing! Thank you so much. You guys rock. I was very tempted to get whole life insurance when I sat down with a financial advisor. I thought about through the whole (no pun intended) process and thought to myself that I could just use the extra money that I'm saving with my current term life insurance policy and just dump it in a mutual fund. Now, thanks to you guys, it looks like I made the right decision. Thank you!!
I'm sad you guys didn't mention the difference between a Fiduciary and a FInancial Adviser!
A LICENCED FIDUCIARY must ALWAYS act and recommend IN YOUR BEST FINANCIAL INTEREST, NOT THEIRS.
It's all subjective.
My licensed fiduciary recommended an whole life insurance policy. It was technically in my benefit as 2% is better than 0 or negative returns and it is a "tax advantaged account". They did reveal they made commission on it, but only after I specifically asked. I had to do my own research to realize there were many pitfalls, among them, if I ever stopped paying my premium (I had an unstable income), I'd end up mostly just paying for insurance. That was bad for me, because I had no dependents and the policy was meant to be purely an investment! A "licensed fiduciary" is at this time, just another tool to help make the sale. It is not any protection for the consumer. I've only done a cursory search, but I could not find any instance of a licensed fiduciary being brought to court and being significantly penalized.
@@jaymathew sorry you got scammed.
I sold life insurance for a year. I spent the summer researching what type of return you can expect and what type of competition is out there.
A couple points
-it is nearly impossible to get accurate data if you are the public. I am convinced they design these policies so you do not research them.
-Only two companies that I know of sell whole life insurance that I could consider to be honest and pay a REAL dividend. 99% of companies that do sell this are scamming you.
-The 99% of companies who sell Whole Life quote a huge dividend like 10%. BUT they take out expenses of the company from YOUR dividend. Most companies pay that 1-2% you were talking about.
-Lastly it is Tax free if you the consumer pays for your policy. Not tax deffered which is only if a business pays for it.
Oh! One last point. Having some whole life insurance is good for market dips when you are retired. But please talk to a financial advisor about this.
Overall great video and you got the main points!
Alex Howard what companies were they?
@@stewartcharles I worked for Northwestern Mutual and they paid the highest only matched by USAA. But your representative is a huge component of this as well. You can easily get taken advantage of.... Its very complicated but something you should look for is Additional Premium. There is a lot of circumstances but if your whole life policy does not have additional premium you may be taken for a ride.
Whole life policies come with large commissions however additional premium is almost nothing and is beneficial for the client.
Look for it as a gage for trust.
If you really want to get into it nearly all whole life policies should have a plan in place to hit that limit before it turns into a MEC or modified endowment contract.
Make sure it MECs before you retire. You shouldnt have to worry about life insurance payments when you are pulling from your investments.
If you want more info let me know. I no longer work in the industry so I do not have any conflicts of interest
Alex Howard Thanks for the response. I asked because I was curious in what you've seen. I've actually been a financial planner at NM for about 10 years now. I'm a little surprised to hear that USAA's IRR was matching NM or beating any of the other major mutual companies.
I agree that it depends on the advisor (I made a recent comment on this video). The piece about average rate of return being at 2% is not even the case for average mutual companies.
My whole life pays 0% id be happy with 1-2%
I totally agree, the advisor has to set up a policy that will pay him less if he does Additional premium (we call it OPP or paid up additions) and that maximizes the clients’ money and reduces the commission.
You must have a trustworthy advisor to get these rare policies.
I've said it before but you're rocking that moustache!
I'm someone who believes in the buy term invest the difference mentality, but whole life can be a decent option for people who don't have the discipline to do that. i see it as a if you struggle to save your money and like to spend it all, go whole life. if you can properly financially plan, go with term
Exactly. Many of these types of videos don’t take account people who are bad with money.
@@highgaugedesign i doubt that irrational spenders are the demographic watching these vids.
I never really understood life insurance before. The way Dave Ramsey explains life insurance and what it's supposed to be for helped me grasp the concept
Dave Ramsey also doesn’t give you context that the example of life insurance he refers to, is Universal Life. Not the same thing
@@Anthony-iu5vs Universal Life is garbage with their high fees.
@@astroman30 not only that, the rising cost of insurance eats into your cash values. The speculative illustrations that they use to sell UL are misleading, you need IN-FORCE illustrations to see just how bad the policy truly looks over time
@@Anthony-iu5vs Yes, it's actually worse than buying a whole life policy.
@@astroman30 by a lot, cash-value whole life is truly a Cadillac investment vehicle. It’s unmatched
You two should make a video on how to spend tax refunds! Considering it’s tax season.
Save them! Invest them!
Or pay your debt with it
Yes! I used to pay all my bills ahead. I sat down with a financial lady at church and she told me some things I didn’t want to hear. Basically if I can’t budget my normal bills On my month to month income I would hurt myself paying bills with tax money.
How about adjust your W-4 with your employer so that money comes to you in your paycheck each week? Why would anyone give an interest free loan to the government when they could use that money to help fund their 401k or Roth IRA?
Pro tip. Not having any refund is the ideal situation as you just gave uncle sam an interest free loan for the past year
Back in time, when they offered me this kind of insurance, I kindly refused because I didn't trust a legal entity to own my money for such a long time... probably wrong reason, but definitely right choice :) Thanks Two Cents, I just stumbled upon your channel and I love it!
When I went to invest my first ever savings of around 2000$ I was sold a ULIP plan which had a lock in period and it was 2000 per annum for 5 years!!!! I was naive with no financial education!!! What you’re doing is very important and I genuinely thank you for it
STAY AWAY FROM WHOLE LIFE INSURANCE AND MLMS...…..
True. With an MLM, look at how the money is made. If it's made by selling products, you might be okay. If the real money is made by getting people to sign up and pay membership fees, training, or buy large amounts of inventory up front, then it's likely a racket.
MLMs yes, Whole life, incorrect.
I love the amount of effort and care that goes into these videos. Please, keep it up!
Thank you so much Michael!
Loving Tia and Tamara 🤣
Thicc
When exiting the military. We were required to take classes about applying for jobs etc.
One of the “teachers” literally told us to get Whole Life Insurance because:
“you’ll get the benefit at age 72, with term you get nothing at age 72”
Luckily I saw the difference in premiums and dodged that bullet
I got convinced to sign up for whole life when I was like 20 years old. The agent did not mention that a portion of my monthly payment was not going into the investment aspect, but rather to fees. He made it sound like the entire payment was going towards an investment account. Sure, ignorant of me to think that, but he made it sound like it was a no-lose deal, so I bought it. Cancelled a year later when I saw my first annual summary and how much was going to fees.
David Tran this is a foolish cancel depending on the company. Whole life insurance is like owning a house you pay the mortgage/fees upfront and you end up with liquid asset in the end. With New York Life for instance you pay fees for about four years coming from your premium and once that clears it goes towards the cash value and death benefit growth. Basically you bought a house at full price and then sold it at a third of the price a year later. Not smart
@@sG_Chimera yeah but obviously he was sold something he didn't want or need, by an unscrupulous agent. Should have gotten his money back IMO.
Travis Nelson i think the agent must have done a poor job explaining that. But the investment piece is there. It’s a guaranteed growth and it should have been apparent in the illustration that the CV would take a couple years to accumulate.
I’ve been a Dave Ramsey follower for eight years and am now completely debt free including my home. I like your videos. They explain both sides to each topic. Keep it up.
This explains nothing much. Glad you got out of debt !
I’m not sure what you mean.
Did a mistake when I was a kid. Never again. Recently, a salesperson was trying to force life insurance as "investment" and it really irked me.
What mistake? Whole Life would actually make a lot of sense when you're younger.
@@heinaye3594 Hein Aye we bought it for my mom and me when I was very young. It was a cash value whole life insurance. Turns out the premium was very much higher for me as well as my mom. If I would have taken the term insurance then my coverage would have been very high as compared to the coverage whole life insurance provided. To my knowledge, plans we were offered were all the ones which would give you the money back with some interest over the years (cash value) and the salesperson told us that it was an investment and we would get back high return and we should buy it because of money that we will be returned was way higher.
@@dhavalchheda1626 ahhh gotcha. Sounds like it was a dishonest insurance salesperson. In general though, you can lock in a cheap premium for whole life when you're young and you can potentially stop paying premiums in your 30's or 40's with paid up premiums.
Let me guess it was HDFC bank lol..
Sister sister
Seán Ahern 😂😂
great advice guys, put all your money in stocks, live through volatile years, lose money in retirement in the down years - clearly you don't understand the value of having 'some' money in whole life - you already own bonds, why not improve on that return?
Pay an insurance company 8% interest to BORROW against your own money, and you think this is a good idea?
Becoming a financial advisor in the next few weeks here. Michigan. I definitely make sure to do my research on term life insurance. I love this and it motivates me to not only learn but make sure I’m doing what’s best for my clients. The money will come if I’m putting their needs first.
Awesome Keep it going! The whole life insurance idea is to hedge against any debt recurring especially in your mortgaged property. It is rendered useless if you are debt free! Heck if I were to protect my family, I'd rather invest in a medical policy with the insurance company!
Can you explain your comment further? What do you mean the whole idea is to hedge against any recurring debt?
@@littlegeo1 simply put a protection against your house debt. If anytime that your life is gone, the debt will be passed down to the next person to payoff the debt. That term life is a partial protection to payoff that debt in cases of anything happen to your life.
@@investingwithaaron9876 Got it. Thank you!!
@@littlegeo1 Welcome! That's my 2 cents :D
Love this channel! I have an investment channel so when this is a treat!
5:34
I have one small question about these numbers. The final value of their policies should neither of them die is as shown in this timestamp. However, Tia's policy never expires so that death benefit of $500,000 is guaranteed to be paid as a result.
Hence, if say both of the sisters die at aged 70, then wouldn't the $500,000 death benefit payout bump Tia's life insurance value to $774,077 vs Tamera's $619,780, making the whole life policy quite worth it for their dependents or descendants?
I could be wrong, but I believe the cash value is given to the insurance company upon your death. Your beneficial will still receive the entire death benefit though, the 500,000
Good explanation but I have not met anyone who bought term and invested the difference.
I work in the insurance business, I rarely recommend whole life, and tell to safe and invest the difference.
Eric Ortiz I believe everyone has their own opinion on each insurance! Love yours
But term and invest the difference can and does work for people. One thing I’ve noticed in my short career, is that my younger clients all say whole life is terrible and they would rather buy term. And then the older clients will say they regret buying term and wish they bought more whole life lol. That’s not to say whole life is the only or best insurance to buy, but it is an interesting observation to think about. I guess it just proves that one size does not fit all.
invest the difference - in reality people buy meme coin, NIKOLA, ARKK, NVDA at all time highs and lost their principal
I've been looking for life insurance for myself recently and talked to an agent who was adamant about whole life and said she even had a whole life policy herself. I could tell it was a total sales pitch but decided to hear her out, and it was basically everything that was stated in this video - premium never changes, you'll be covered your ENTIRE life, dividends.... But I'm glad I did my own research beforehand, because when I reinvest the difference, I know it'll be worth more than the whole life policy in the end, AND I feel like I'm on track for a retirement savings so I don't have to depend on a whole life insurance policy. Great video!
That’s why I almost always avoid talking to an actual sales agent of insurance. They almost always round up.
I am a licensed financial advisor and I don’t have a whole life policy on myself nor would I ever recommend this to a client. If an agent/advisor offers you a whole life policy, run the other way.
You wouldn't recommend this to a client because you don't understand the value of building capital, you don't think long-term, and you have faith in markets that are heavily manipulated and prone to crashing, as well as a currency (the US dollar) whose value is being inflated away at a record pace.
Maybe if you took the time to do any research at all on whole life, you would have a different perspective, instead of dismissing it out of hand.
@@moriendus get the gtof you don’t build wealth with a f insurance plan the general market and the Real estate will always outperform that.
@@theAppleWizz You clearly have no idea how cash value life insurance works. You shouldn't speak from ignorance. Also, if you think that the market and real estate will always go up, then you don't understand why that is happening or why it is unsustainable. I suggest you educate yourself before making these ridiculous claims.
@@moriendus bro this a whole video on why whole life is a stupid idea. This is why people like Warren Buffett buys out gullible people at 80 90. If you can’t handle a 30% market drop just say that but that does not mean the cash value is anything more than just a marketing ploy. Just so you know the insurance company has been investing your money and making 10x what you will ever get.
@@theAppleWizz This video has factually incorrect information and therefore draws invalid conclusions from that bad info. It also doesn't address how someone can actually use the cash value in the policy. I know that the cash value isn't a "marketing ploy" because I have cash value and have financed things in my life with it.
I can tell you don't understand whole life insurance because you think the insurance company is "making money off of me" and you fail to understand that a MUTUAL life insurance company is owned by the policyholders. If the insurance company makes money, then I make money as an owner of the company. This is what dividends in life insurance are.
As I said, you need to do actual research on the subject instead of listening to the fake gurus who made this video because they either lied or just didn't know what they were talking about as they just made blatant factual errors.
I always walk away from your videos feeling like I learned more than a few things! And I have been in the insurance industry for a decade! 🙃
If you've been in the industry for a decade and you can't refute misinformation like this, then quit. That it's on PBS, is shocking. They're just simply not correct in a number of ways, it just not this simple, if it was then everyone would be the same, all companies would be the same, all products would be the same, there would be no need for the heavy regulation that insurance companies and the agents that work for them MUST adhere to, at least I'm Canada. The information is at best incomplete, definitely misleading, but it suits a narrative and fear based/bias based "newsyish" faux journalists seem to get more views. Of course they make nothing if you don't watch.
@@sjonas8777 I actually work with our legal team on compliance and regulations. You live in Canada....much, much different. Before you go insulting people you should know the subject matter at hand. But assholes like you feel the need to pipe up on EVERYTHING you disagree with on the internet. I would normally wish anyone well, but you can fly a fucking kite. Insurance is very complex, and I suppose it is unfair to expect someone of your likes to understand it. But this was a very comprehensive presentation meant to give people the basic principles of the different kinds of policies so they can be a bit more informed on their own. Agents are in no way required to explain the differences - they just get to earn the commission. Enjoy your miserable life trolling good people on the internet!
@@lizswank7239 you say I'm insulting, yet I never swore nor did I put people down or call them "trolls", rarely do I comment and certainly even more rarely in a negative way. If you are indeed in compliance then you would realize, basically am saying exactly what you said that insurance is a complicated business, and that this simple video does not do it justice. You will think whatever you think, and you're overreacting continues to make me glad to be Canadian, if you ever come up, I will treat you and your spouse to dinner then ,I will meet the real you and have good conversation about things we can agree on, there is likely many more of those than you would believe.
@@sjonas8777 troll. Telling people to quit and calling this misinformation....You suck
My coworker bought this as an investment strategy, as recommended by her agent, and keeps encouraging me to it too. Glad I watched this first!! Thanks a bunch! I learned from it
It's a scam.
This video would have helped me 2 years ago before I got a pushy "financial planner" that practically forced whole life insurance on me. After a lot of work I managed to cancel it. Hopefully this video can help other people make more informed decisions than past me.
An insurance salesman and a financial planner are NOT the same thing.
why did you cancel it?? Im in the process of learning how to get one the right way
@@travis1240 Lots of FPs sell shitty life insurance. They aren't mutually inclusive, but they certainly can be one in the same in many circumstances
@@Picwajzzz did you not learn anything from the video
I wish this video was around a year ago when I decided to purchase a whole life insurance policy! I'm going to look into canceling it now.
*Love Tia and Tamara*
Back to 90s are we
Quahntasy - Animating Universe
Cha cha cha chia
theyre still alive.
My wife and I just did term until our house is paid off incase one of us died and had to take care of the kids we wanted to be financially secure. Took the extra money and throw it in investments every month instead, no need for whole life, once kids are old enough and homes are paid off its no longer needed really.
I had a couple of friends who had been trying to sell me VUL. I think they believe in the product (and yeah commissions too) because in order to become an agent, they had to have one themselves. I I have to decline over and over because I don't take advice from people with conflicts of interest. If financial gurus with nothing to gain says term and invest the rest, then yeah, that is what I am going to do should I have a dependent in the future.
Whole Life Insurance is not an investment .. and shouldn’t be sold as one. In the state of FL it’s illegal to sell it that way and any agent can lose their license.
Mark Cohen this couple do zero research
Can you make a part 2 that goes into borrowing from this Whole Life Insurance rather than a normal bank? Say they both take the same loans out that are the average loans that people take. And then include the age of average death to see how the return on the $500,000 fits in since 1 expires. Maybe even start from age 30 and go to 80ish. And also show a chart of when investment in 1 overtakes the other (if at all)? That would be awesome.
Well, the probably don’t want to emphasize being able to use the cash. Where 401k , and IRAs are only meant for the time spent after 59 1/2.
Borrowing money from yourself and paying interest is never a good idea. Any money borrowed plus interest is taken off the face amount in the event of a payout of the face amount.
~Sister Sister~
~Never knew how much I missed in~
~Potential savings in my life insurance~
One financial advisor made the argument to me that with a standard index fund, because of fees at whatnot, you’re real annualized expected interest per year is like 4ish percent over long periods of time. And therefore recommended the insurance policy. I noticed that over the last 30 years, there was a 7.8% annualized average boost in the snp 500 (but this might be higher than it should be because were likely nearing the end of a cycle); how much of this is lost to fees?
Invest in Vanguard and their fees are incredibly low. There is probably somewhere with insanely high fees, but clearly this person was just giving you advice that would help themselves.
Why are people still paying fees in index funds come onz
I've seen companies show that the death benefit increases along with the cash value. And what about the direct recognition vs the indirect recognition when it comes to borrowing from a policy?
Thanks for this enlightening video :)
Some guy actually tried to sell this kind of insurance to me last year and i don't even have any dependents
They do it all the time -- that's bold!
I have objectively studied the numbers and have tried to explain to so many people that whole life is not the way to go however I am left with a lot of frustration :(. Even with videos like this, people make their own choices with how they spend their money
What would you recommend?
It is heartwrenching...
A "financial adviser" that is recommending life insurance as an investment is likely not an adviser. They're a salesman.
You guys didnt talk about the capital gains tax on that index fund investment. There's no tax on the life insurance policy.
They also jumped from a risk-free vehicle to a 100% market risk vehicle. Apples and oranges.
@Exoplanet Research Yep. The death benefit is tax-free, while estate taxes can run up to 40 percent. Once the estate tax provisions of the TCJA sunset, we're back down to a much lower exemption. Ouch.
The other thing these guys totally miss is how these policies are actually constructed in the field. For example, hardly any 20 something is ever going to be sold a 500,000 pure whole life policy. It's going to be something more like a $50,000 permanent death benefit and a $450,000 term rider, which allows the policy owner to put a lot more premium in, up to the MEC limit, to build cash value much faster. After x number of years, the term goes away (as does the cost of continuing that term insurance) but the cash value, including a bunch of dividends paid along the way (if it's a participating policy) will support a much higher permanent death benefit than the 50,000... and continuing to earn dividends tax free, which can be withdrawn tax free if you no longer need the life insurance. That and you can exchange it for a lifetime income annuity if you like without having to pay capital gains tax (or ...if it's in an IRA, ordinary income tax).
I don't think whole life policies are for everybody. They're frequently oversold. But for people in high tax brackets, with illiquid estates, estate tax concerns, probate concerns,or asset protection concerns, they can be terrific.
These are people a lot of 20-something and 30-something financial reporters who never sign the front of a paycheck don't understand, and aren't writing for.
@@jasonvansteenwyk5984 I'm sure the no one watching this video will have estate tax problem tho lol. Very very few do. Even if you're rich enough. Your death benefit is in your gross estate so it'll get taxed at 40 percent unless you have ILIT...
@@ksmoothy28 Expand your thinking. People watching this video are unlikely to have an estate tax problem NOW. However, they may well have estate tax concerns (and asset protection concerns) 25, 30, 40, 50 years from now. After their term insurance has expired, and they have a successful business, a comfortable home, maybe some other rental properties, accumulated stock, etc. And who knows what the estate tax exemption will be then... especially the way younger voters are breaking for Sanders. If that trend continues, we may well have a very low estate tax exemption at some point in the future.
Meanwhile, yes, your death benefit would be in your gross estate IF you own the policy in your own name. But people with estate tax concerns are going to use ILITs. Meanwhile, trusts can't own IRAs. So you can't move any wealth in your IRAs, etc. out of your estate. It's trapped there.
Don't get me wrong... I'm a YUUUUUUGE fan of term... especially with shorter terms, like 1 year and 5 years. (People selling 10-20 year term on a BTID concept don't quite understand their own system, or they're trying to goose their commissions, too). I'm also a HUUUUUGE fan of index investing.
But people in high tax brackets, with successful businesses, significant real estate, real asset-protection concerns, etc. are playing a different ballgame than W-2 folks working jobs... even if some of those jobs pay pretty well. It's a different mindset. A lot of online content and financial journalism doesn't get that. What's good advice for a schoolteacher isn't going to be great for the guy who owns a chain of tire shops, a general contracting company, or a good-sized farm, and vice versa.
I got talked into this scam and lost 5k. I didn't know anything about investing so I was an easy target. After cancelling it, I Invested in Tesla and made 60k the next year. Not a fair comparison, but there are better investments out there.
Sad part of this video is that they left out that Tia has probably around $400-450k of death benefit over the top of the cash value. However, if you buy whole life to have your cash value compete with investments, you are doing it wrong and will be disappointed, which they do address. Lastly, IRR on good WL policies are typically 3-4%. So higher than shown, but do not compare with long term investment returns.
I made a call to Dave Ramsey about this. The video is called Aunt and Uncle $5,000,000 mistake. I couldnt talk my aunt and uncle out of it, but showing a video of Dave Ramsey talking to me about it sure did.
One thing you forgot that I think is important is people with whole life think their dependents will receive the cash value along with the policy. Thats false, the insurance keeps the cash value, they only get the policy.
Depends on the policy.
The cash value is the face amount. What are you talking about lol
@@kevinjohnstone2911 Cash value and death benefit are two separate things and in some cases a policy would pay both.
@@jeremyed9507 Same shit, different mask. Cash value is only used for emergencies and never for leasure
@@jeremyed9507 leisure
Look into reverse mortgages too! It seems sketchy af
I was in the mortgage business for awhile and 98% of the time, reverse mortgages do NOT make sense for the client. There are far better ways to utilize debt if you absolutely have to.
100% true. I used to sell life insurance, and I would never ever sell whole life... because I have a conscience.
I have 3 policies, all whole life should I cancel them and keep 1 or cancel all 3 and get term. Term is scary because I'm 38 even if I get a 30 yr term what happens when I turn 69 and term expires
@@ebo7310 you def should rewrite your three policies into one get money back from your cash value that you have built up and with the 3 policies into one it will make the premium cheaper as well as have less hassle for your beneficiaries because they wont have to put in three different claims to get money
me personally think term is a scam because statistically terms never pay out there face amount due to it having to expire and with medicine nowadays most live past there term
also more often then not what term is really good for is the fact that its cheap and get high face amount but the use of that is lets say you have multiple properties and also a business your able to get a term and have a high face amount to pay for all the assets u left behind while having a cheap premium but thats honestly one of the only good reasons other than that its whole life all the way you dont need a 100k whole life 20k is more then enough to pay for a proper burial and with just 20k as a face amount your premium will be very low (of course based on age and health) but assume you have good health and ur 38 you would only be paying 42 bucks a month while building cash value an other things along with that people dont really know benefits of whole life
so sorry i ranted on this thread but had to be done
My husband and I just entered our 40s fretting over not having a life insurance policy in place. Thank you for sharing this insight. We're late in getting our act together, but just in time to start making smarter financial decisions.
Nowhere in this vid did they say you shouldn't have life insurance. Get it together.
Thanks for making this video, nearly bought whole life a few years ago. I'll take my Roth accounts, thanks!
Dave ramsary is right after all.... thank you 😊
We were able to get some term life insurance past year on the recommend of our FA. It was stupid cheap and really easy
Please make sure to invest the difference in a Roth IRA partnered with mutual funds.
Somewhere Dave Ramsey is smiling right now.
humbertXX
“SELL THE CAR ALREADY!!!”
humbertXX term life insurance or whole life insurance with beans and rice
Make the kids think they're next!
You mean Mr. know it all?
One thing I guess you guys are missing that Tia still has death benefit of $500k against Tiamera who has nothing as a death benefit to protect the beneficiaries. So basically Tia still has approx $774k while Tiamera has approx $650k.
If Tiamera decided to continue with new Term policy at the age of 70, she might need to pay lefty monthly premium.
Also, for me and my wife, we both pay $1800 annual whole life premium and we are 29 years old. We would need to pay it until next 20 years which would be total $36000 each and we are getting $41000 cash value at that time (death benefit is always there).
Cash value would increase as the years pass on and beneficiaries are protected by death benefit.
What do you think about this scenario and did we make good choice to go with whole life insurance against the term life insurance?
Amazing video and keep it up!
Simple question: What happens to all that cash value when you die?
We ladder up here: 20 year term, five years later - another 20 year term, repeat. We have three terms going on me right now @ about $750,000 total and is good till I reach 75 (slowly dwindling to that point). All of them allow me to switch to a whole if I desire. However, we also have our IRA, which we will expand on and put money into, apart from whole (which would be a last scenario option). I agree with the video: Term, ladder up if you can, and look into any sort of portfolio to increase that compounding interest till you retire (or longer). Awesome job, guys.
For those who are curious; it all depends on your health and age. But, throughout my laddering (from 35-45 years old), I have a 20-term+, another 20-term+ and now a 30-term+, totally $750,000 and only pay about $130/month. Which may seem steep for some. However, if I die before any of those expire, my family gets three-quarters of a million dollars. A good trade off for a little over a hundred a month. If someone stuff the same amount of cash in their pillow to reach that payout, it would take them over 480 years to acquire it. So, in short, term life is a good safety net to have. It is not a get rich quick scheme; it is there as security for your family, if anything should happen to you.
Oh my gosh I'm so happy this came up in my recommended. I was at a loss for words as to how to explain this to my husband but. Now I can just be like, "watch this! This! Thisthisthis!"
That's why we're here, Julie!
Please Julia this youtube is very generic and takes nothing about the persons needs wants and desires. Did they mention that over 92% of term policies never get paid out as a claim? If this person was a licensed salesperson they would be fined for calling Life Insurance an investment..Just my two cents. Plan carefully. Something is wrong here. If this is what you are using to make BIG decision for you and your family, your making a big mistake.
Or have an actual professional explain it instead of a TH-camr
So if I understood this video correctly, term insurance is like a contingency plan on life until one can build enough wealth to cover funeral expenses + dependent costs? So when term life insurance runs out in 20 or 30 years, you’re not insured anymore?
Yes, but you can choose your term.
Yes, that’s exactly right. Have insurance to cover the short fall. Once build enough wealth, cancel it because you are now self insured.
Yes! But if you aren’t disciplined and actually save you’ll be up a creek. That’s why I have an increasing term. I’m insured all the way until I’m 80 if I want to keep it that long. Just in case I get sick or something and wouldn’t be able to buy more insurance when I need it.
Riley Yandell Yes, getting term for the right length of time is important. Having it be renewable is essential too.
I’ve been working in the insurance industry for several years and started with a life insurance company. What I find shameful is “experts” using their personal opinions to sway people one way or the other. This was not an objective view. It was merely another opinion that as usual fell short of the full picture. Both term and whole life insurance serve their purpose depending on the circumstances. The reality is not everyone can afford to buy term and actually invest the difference.
The other issue I find ridiculous is only acting as if there’s only the options of term and whole life insurance. There are multiple types of term insurance as well as permanent insurance that consumers should be educated about.
In the end, a decision should be made based on the circumstances including but not limited to affordability, age, health, family situation (do you have small children?) assets, liabilities, and final expenses. I often recommend a combination of both depending on these variables.
Bottom line, speak with someone who can offer more than opinions based on their own views and experiences. Find a trusted advisor who’s has the ability to understand you personal circumstances and advise accordingly with your best interest in mind.
i hope u doing better,that sound rough
I canceled one after three months once I learned the pay out at 65 was halved!
Primerica financial was founded on this concept.. buy term and invest the difference. Term insurance is the way to go!
This is exactly why I stopped selling insurance, I could not provide a product that I couldn't enthusiastically get behind
Look into universal index life. It’s like a whole life but the moneys invested into an index fund.
@@Marcustrismegistus That still doesn't solve the issue. The premiums will be higher, the cost of insurance goes up annually until the cost of insurance is exceeds the level premium. Then the Automatic Premium Loan Rider kicks in, eat all the cash value and the policy lapses even before the client can blink...
@@SpasticRocks may be true if it’s level cash value meaning the cash value can never exceed the life ins amt. if it’s increasing cash the life insurance grows bc the cash value exceeds the amt your covered for. I own a couple of indexed life and they’re pretty much on track to what illustrated at 8%. These policies can later be switched to level death benefit when you take out money for retirement or what ever you need lowering the cost of insurance.
@@Marcustrismegistus Question is how much is the monthly premium? I'm sure the cost is 6-8 times of term. Buy Term and Investing the difference yourself would yield better, if not more ideal results. You may be getting 8% returns, however how much of that is eaten up in fees? For the average person in the US, they don't have insane estate planning needs, so Cash Value policies make no sense for them.
Most of the information I'm sharing is cause I'm a licensed agent and there's plenty of books that share the same message. I'm not bashing against the product. It has its uses for certain people, but in the interest of most people, selling them a whole life policy that they don't understand and overpay for is not the right thing to do. This is why most people don't trust insurance agents or companies!
@@SpasticRocks my premium is pretty low since I got them when I was around 25. They used to say big term and invest the difference and before in the 80’s and early 90’s sure. You can pretty much use a dart throw it on the wall and what ever stock it landed on you can make 12-15 returns. The fee part maybe true on whole life but not IUL. The total cash value I’m supposed to have by 65 is 4-5 times more than what I invested with cost and fees. If I buy term and invest the difference, let’s say I buy a term rn to cover my exp, wages, kids school etc. I’d prob pay $120 for 1 mil coverage. If I get it now at 34 at a 30 year term. I invest the difference, where am I gonna get 8%. I’m only getting that on the iul bc it has a cap and a floor strategy which I don’t loose money and caped at 15% return. On investment if I make 10% and have it on risky investment the total fees are around 3%. Total return 7%. If I loose 7% the next year, guess what? They still charge me the acct fees, agent fess, etc. -3%+ -7% return = 10% loss. Let’s say I accumulate a measly 1million by retirement. My term expired. If I want to transfer wealth guess how much my premium is going to be? 1,500 a month. Bc as you said yourself? Cost of insurance goes up as mortality goes up. I’m have couple of securities license, life and health in different states. I’m sure you’re very well educated in the subject as am I. I’m a Certified Financial Educator and just have to pass the certification to be a Certified Financial Planner. I’ve been a professional at this for almost a decade.
Liscensed financial advisor and insurance agent here. You're onto something with the commission bit, like a lot. But I would also point to policies for young people and children. The premiums are often inexpensive the younger you are. That's why I would have loved to have heard a bit on the insidious side of "grow up" policies for small children/babies. Personally I think whole life can be a viable option for retirement in the right set of circumstances for the right person under the right balance of premiums to payout. But undercutting that, usually it's not.
Love your channel 2cents. I am glad there is at least one other pro-whole life insurance policy person here. I got a whole life policy mainly because of the protection if gives you from creditors. I work a job where there is a decent chance I am going to get sued one of these days. Earning 7% on zero dollars = zero dollars at the end of the day.
Jedidiah Young for the right person whole life is a good option, typically the younger you are the more time you have to pay into it, when I worked with it we never treated it as an investment, more so as a savings plan. People get fussy with slow growth when it can be a stable asset that takes a long time to grow.
@@danielshen5349 it has to be for the right combination of cost/reward. Term life as a strategy means you might be rewriting policies frequently (once every 10 yrs). Cash value is not the main selling point it's a secondary strategy. The main thing I see is locking in a good rate and helping people get set with their financial future. It's not a silver bullet but it's a good tool.
Yes it is. I have designed children policies that often are difficult to keep from MEC’ing just because the returns are so high early and cash value accumulation is also high. I like to always illustrate the ACTUAL rate of return, and when designed properly you get high 4% low 5% close to MECing. A 1000/mo (150k total contribution) 15pay starting age 1 gets 2.5mil in retirement at age 65. If they wait another 15 years at age 80 they will have 4.5 mil. At this point it makes more sense to have annual cash value surrender/loan of about 100-125k/year (65 to 70), !tax free! which is not a bad retirement, even accounting for inflation. It is in fact several times more than what you’d get from a similar contribution from Social Security. The highest return policies are 5-pay but it also requires a lot of free cash, this is why the wealthy park some their money on these for their children. But again it’s life insurance with living benefits. Not a replacement for investments.
@@MasterFallenHero It also largely depends on the company offering the product. I was surprised at the average return of 2%. Mutual companies pay more into the cash value. I also think its not made to be compared to the market. It's a lower return with less risk. I think it's safe to say that with an expected higher return, you can expect a higher risk. They should have compared this to a CD or High Yield Savings account
So I've been considering Whole Life insurance but not for the investment opportunity, but for the Infinite Banking Opportunity (I invest in other ways). So I really wished you could have elaborated more on whether that aspect of it was a good idea. Would taking out a loan against your life insurance to buy things like cars or other large ticket items be a better source than a standard loan and are there any downsides to it. For me, the whole life wouldn't be an "investment" arm so much as just life insurance WITH a savings account attached. If I'm already putting $500 in savings a month (using your example) wouldn't it be worthwhile to use a whole life insurance as a savings arm instead of an investment arm?
olandir No. If the savings is your money, why would you have to take it as a loan? Buy cheap Term and invest the difference in a Roth IRA. Also with Whole Life there is only one pay out.... either the death benefit and the insurance company keeps the cash or you get the cash which likely has about a 2% return and the policy is canceled. If you borrow from it you have to pay it back with interest either way. If the idea of taking money out of your own savings account and it being treated as a loan with interest seems stupid, Whole Life is exactly that.
its not worth it at all. invest in realestate if you want take a shot at the silverbullet. you can take out loans based on the value of your real assets.
Tia has 200,000 tax free that she can collateralize so her 200,000 keeps growing at 4-6% even is she takes out loans against the policy. If she does this in retirement she has income that does not increase her total taxable income. She could have set up a policy that only required her to make 5-10 payments so even though the policy never expires she does not need to pay for her "whole life". The value of her account can never go down. She also has half a million dollars that will go to her beneficiary tax free.
Tamara has 600,000 that she has to pay tax on so really she has $400,000. As she spends the money she stops getting a return on the money spent. The vale of her account can go down. She has also taken on a risk called sequence risk. If the market has a few bad years in the beginning of her retirement it can significantly reduce the amount of income she will have for retirement. The order in which she gets her returns can add to the depletion of her account.
Neither account by itself is going to be enough to get the sisters through their retirement. But if Tia uses her financial tool while she is alive to be efficient in paying for the major costs of life it will open up funds for her to put into a second account. Tamara doesn't fully understand this and she can never use the money in her account to be efficient in other areas or else she risks not maximizing the return her chosen account can provide.So Tamara goes through her whole life thinking she has made the right choice because her account will have a bigger number on her retirement day. Little does she understand, like most people using her method, that bigger number does not equal more money to use in retirement.
I have been watching tons of videos trying to understand more about whole life insurance and whether it makes sense. This is definitely the best one. Thank you Two Cents.
Northwestern Mutual will be the first dislike.
BunkMasterFlex77 I’m a Northwestern Advisor. I actually love it! I may show it to my clients.
The only thing I will say is if you run the numbers using our policies (lowest cost of insurance in the business) it’s much more comparable. Plus, I never recommend it as a primary investment. Merely as a compliment to investments. It makes a great alternative to other fixed income assets (bonds or cash) and is especially useful for reducing market exposure. (No downside risk.)
@@rileyyandell3505 but you guys selling a long paid whole life tho. It's no good compare to short paid...
Riley Yandell Not all NM advisors are like you... and at the end of the day it’s a bad product in my opinion
@@ksmoothy28 in defense of Riley, NM has custom built, qualified whole life policies that are paid up in as few as 7 years, and pre-packaged whole life policies that complete payments in as soon as 10 years.
@@miles9922 i know but I'm saying most reps only sell traditional whole life.... Mostly due to higher commission ;)
You left out the part that the company only pays out the DB upon death while keeping the cash value.
They keep whatever one you don't pick. True though that you only get to pick between the cash value or the death benefit
Watching this I'm surely glad I went for simple life insurance for €40/month rather than (something like) whole life which in my case was "only" €50/month first year but in 40 years I would end up near the €400/month range (and how would I be able to afford that when in 40 years I'd be pensioner? And no I didn't calculate the price further that was enough for me).
But the idea of investing the difference seems like a good choice :)
Term life is the same for the whole term-then it can go up, because the original premiums were based on your risk during that time frame. That's why you select a term that lasts until it is no longer needed to pay off debt or take care of descendants-then you drop it.
First of all ...Whole life insurance is not an investment. You cannot loose money on it so it’s not a investment.....
Their conclusion doesn’t make sense, they did not include the death benefit the sister will leave her loved one (tax free). So her total $274,000 + 500,000 (her family will get) =$774,000. It doesn’t mention that Tamara will have to pay taxes of 35%. So out of $619,000 ($200,00 +in taxes ) so approx less than $ 400,000. They are biased, and miss informing their viewers.
You didn't mention the worst thing about the whole life policy that Tia bought. Let's say she dies when she's 69 years old. Her beneficiary receives the $500,000 death benefit as agreed, but the $270,000 investment cash value that she built up in her account is lost. The insurance company gets to keep it. This, in my opinion, is criminal.
You're 100% correct, sir.
@@dakotadak100 So you think Tia's beneficiary, in this example, would receive $770,000? You're wrong. The beneficiary receives $500,000.
@@dakotadak100 Semantics. They're owed whatever the agreement says they're owed. I'm not saying they're violating the terms of the agreement, I'm saying the agreement itself is ridiculous. Tia paid about 10 times (or thereabouts; I don't feel like watching the video again) what she would have paid for a term policy with an equivalent death benefit because she understood that there was some amount of money that's hers as some sort of "investment." That's why she bought it; there's no other reason to buy whole life. But when Tia dies, the "investment" is gone. If everyone understood this, no one would buy whole life.
@@dakotadak100 couldn't have said it better myself! There is tons of misleading information in this video!
I've been wrestling with this for the past month. I've had a whole life policy through Northwestern Mutual for the last four years, and this video and conversations with friends have made me start to rethink it. I met with my financial adviser from NWM earlier this week to talk through it. He said of course he'd do whatever I said regarding the policy, but he wanted to talk about why I'm rethinking it. His main argument in favor is that it's a shelter from bear markets during retirement. He acknowledged that it doesn't grow as efficiently as an index fund or something similar, but he said the savings from pulling money from the cash value instead of a market-related fund in retirement during a bear market can be huge. He showed some graphs and sent me some materials to read over.
It's all pretty overwhelming for me. I'm digging in, but I don't feel like I have the background to make the decision. Is there any validity to that argument? I don't have an dependents, so the insurance component doesn't mean much for me. I've already maxed out my IRA and am putting money in a brokerage account, so this is more of an extra thing he recommends as protection during a recession.
Any advice on how to validate the accuracy of the bear market shelter stuff and how to determine if that's worthwhile?
@@NateGreensides Thanks for the input! From what I understand from what my FA told me and what the Whole Life paperwork says, after age 65 I quit paying the premium. From there there's a guaranteed cash value and an estimated cash value based on estimated dividends (which my FA says is slightly low-balled). The insurance payout includes a base amount plus cash value, so what gets paid to my beneficiary includes a guaranteed amount plus part of my remaining cash value, as I understand it.
My FA mentioned annuities and other options that work for bear market protection as well, but he recommended the whole life policy because of the dividends and the tax benefits.
He also said that this policy is different from a lot of the whole life policies out there. He said that most of them are crap, but this type of policy is the OG whole life, not one of the newer models. I don't remember what terms he used specifically.
What he said made sense to me, but I'm still thinking about getting a second opinion from a fee-only FA.
@@NateGreensides Thanks for the insight. I do not live in CA, but this is helpful for informing my conversations with my FA.
According to my paperwork, the premium will never go up. I also have a document that shows what the policy looks like each year. The insurance payout column starts at the base amount and increases as the cash value increases. That's what my FA meant by the two being combined. I'll ask for clarification, though.
The annual premium column stays the same until age 65, when it goes to 0. There are two cash surrender value columns, one that is guaranteed and another that adds in potential dividends. The guaranteed column is always slightly higher than the total premium paid column, but it continues to increase even when the premium stops at age 65. The cash value column with potential dividends is significantly higher (almost double) the guaranteed.
I've been putting around 500 a month for over 5 years now. With covid19 my unemployment was stuck and I had the plan pay for itself for a month. I've taken out quite a few loans on the policy and it's been quite helpful. I now have a son and it's good to know that even if I never pay back the loan the death benefit still pays a large sum minus the loan amount.
Buying into stocks fluctuates a lot and buying these days when the market is up (falsely imo) is quite risky.
Overall I'm happy that I'm doing the policy and also have other investments that have higher risk but I can count on the policy.
I can’t speak to the individual integrity of your FA, but he has a personal relationship with you, knows your needs, and can be held accountable for his advice. Those other sources can’t.
I recommend sticking with your FA if he’s trustworthy and gets good results.
Thank you for this video, this also applies to variable life insurance but its worse since they transfer the risk to the insured. Term and Invest are the best!
It’s very simple. Will you need life insurance for your whole life? You shouldn’t! Life insurance is to insure yourself when others depend on you. If you’re the breadwinner and/or your family depends on your income, you should be insured. But do you plan on having others depend on you for the rest of your life? When you retire you probably won’t need life insurance since you should have a retirement fund to take care of you and your spouse. your kids might already be out of the house but if they’re not they too can benefit from your retirement savings.
Probably the best video yet on this channel! I recently had someone talking to me about this and personally felt it sounded scammy