For over 40 years, haven't you heard about the fall of the Berlin Wall and the fall of the communist Soviet Union? The Communist Party was banned until 2000 the soviet union no longer exists Yugoslavia no longer exists Czechoslovakia no longer exists You're ridiculous and you don't even know it.
Ты смеешься или вы просто насмотрелись мультика "Анастасия"? Он был ужасным императором, совершенно не понимал, что происходит в народе, настроения, голод населения и эта совершенно ненужная война с Японией, которая и стала началом конца. Вы понятия не имеете, что происходило в ту эпоху в России
He also sent millions of Russians to their death in a war he didn't know how to win even though he had numbers, land and resources. And when people were starving, he didn't care. Say what you want about Lenin, but he gave people what they wanted. Land and bread.
It's a myth that the Russian Empire "was a horrible place", though it was obviously not heaven either, it was just "normal". What was a horrible place was the Soviet Union that formed later- over 20 million dead thanks to its down governments policies. I dont recall a Tsar that got that many innocents killed in such a short time.
He sent millions to die in a pointless war and ruined his country's economy, and people were starving. He is the reason there was a Soviet Union. He was totally out of touch. He would have been better off abdicating after 1905 or becoming a Constitutional Monarch. That way he could have lived. But World War I destroyed Russia.
McBabwe : I don't think the problem was Nicholas II's reign itself but instead it was the problem of the political autocratic system by which he ruled under. Autocracy may have worked well during the 17th & 18th centuries during the reign of Peter I "aka" (Peter the Great). But it was completely unworkable in the 20th century during Nicholas II's reign. I truly believe that if he had been a constitutional monarch and wasn't forced to meddle in politics that Nicholas II would have been a truly beloved and respected Tsar/Emperor. In that instance the Russian monarchy could have survived instead of suffering the terrible fate of history which actually occured to it.
Idiocy knows no bounds. It's easy to cry for the Czar when all you know about Imperial Russia comes from a Don Bluth animated movie. I'm sure the Russian people's new access to secular education, healthcare, literacy, and jobs make Auschwitz look like a family picnic.
@@herondelatorre4023 Russia today is in a pretty good spot, and its culture and its territory are incredible assets. There is still plenty of potential for Russian splendour.
Tsar Nicholas II was in one of the toughest spots anyone could have been as a leader, especially a hereditary leader. Russia had a history of strong tsars, autocrats and nobility, when the world around it was constitutionalizing. Tsar Nicholas II, as many said, did not think he was going to have to become Tsar of All Russians, but fate had different plans, he wanted a happier and simpler life, but he did what was his duty to the best of his ability. From what I can understand, he felt, along with most people, God selected him to lead his people, to improve the nation out of the 19th century and into the 20th, but due to the Russian-Japanese conflict and communists exploiting the defeat, he really was struggling against an uphill battle. So, in my opinion, Tsar Nicholas II loved his people, he loved Russia and did the best he could in a really bad situation; and it's important to remember, the short republic after his murder did not last long, at all, it fell incredibly quickly to the USSR. May the last Tsar, his family, along with those soldiers and civilians who defended the legacy of the Russian people, rest in peace.
@@BartoloVids United Kingdom of GreatBritain - Russian royal families intermarriage dates from the begining till the End of Monarchy.Britain has the First priority to inherit the Throne.
12 million Russians that died because the Tsars wouldn't give up, breaks my heart. I give two shits about some royal parasite whose family had more wealth than the city of Moscow produces in an entire year today.
True. Ending the war, bringing free secular education and healthcare to the people, creating jobs, housing, industry and interfering with God's plan for Russia. Horrible man!
Today we mourn the losses of the last Tsar and his beautiful family. It’s a terrible part of Russian history. A huge mistake that cannot be compensated. Russians killed part of their national identity when they allowed such massacre. May the Romanovs rest In Peace.
Alexandra Feodrovna was Queen Victoria’s favorite grand daughter. There is a photo of Baby Olga with her great Grandma Queen Victoria, they honestly looked like twins next to each other. If Queen Victoria was alive when Alexandra was murdered I do believe a war could’ve broke out because when Victoria was alive Alexandra was a member of the British Royal family, a close member. But when Victoria’s son became King it kinda changed. She was pushed out of the loop
Holding the monarch accountable was fair, Blaming the royal consort was expected, Involving the children was heartless, The way they were killed was pure evil.
@@BolshevikCarpetbagger1917 and by looking at India, the Middle East and Europe is suggesting that national socialism is returning. Italy just had an election. China is Not fully communist and Cuba and North Korea are INSIGNIFICANT. Japan can easily destroy North Korea.
Lenin, the guy who brought peace and unified Russia. Stalin the guy who lead the Soviets against Germany and actually won. I don't think they matter here. The focus is on the tsar and his failures.
Los hijos eran inocentes, el zar era un incompetente que se escondía tras los lujos de palacio mientras su gente moría de hambre y sus soldados morían en las trincheras.
@@4st7lb25 el nisiquiera queria ser zar y dijo que no estaba preparado, lo obligaron y en la revolución no tenía casi a nadie de su lado así que nunca pudo hacerle frente a los comunistas, ni adaptarse al trono ya que estuvo siempre en guerras constantes cosa para lo que el no era bueno
Nicholas never wanted to be Tsar. It takes a narcissistic personality to lead, it wasn't in him. I dont think he had a choice when your country, generals and military turn on you. 😒 Either way this is very disturbing, immoral and sad. God bless their souls 🙏 ❤
@@davec1615 On the contrary, there is evidence that Lenin was involved. In the diary of Yurovsky, the chief executioner, he says he got the orders from Lenin, Yakov Sverdlov and one other guy. Whether you want to admit it or not, that right there, is concrete evidence that Lenin indeed was a monster and was involved in killing children just so he wouldn't lose his power. He wasn't a noble man like the communist agenda makes you believe. He was just possibly better than Stalin or Hitler, that's it.
A kingdom wasn't spawned out of thin air, it was built, bricks by bricks. A king can't claim the throne, he must earn the throne. Long live the great kings and queens of today and of history.
Tsar Nicholas the II was not a demon but neither he was an angel but he did not deserve to end like that his family did not deserve that and people need to know that and read more, the Tsar was a man like any other he made mistakes, Lenin and Stalin were much worst then the Romanovs would ever be.
I'm so pleased to see someone from the Romanov still alive h got five children and I hope one day they will have more children princess Olga still Alice I'm glad I read their story and I watch how they where executed very sad how human can do this to another
Watching the end of nicholas ii rule makes me think of Mohammad Reza Pahlavi the last Emperor of Iran who was also overthrown by a revolution and the Ussr and Islamic Republic of Iran became horrible not giving human rights and made their countries horrible.
@@kittycatwithinternetaccess2356 Imperial guards followed a mandate that was enacted by Czar Nicky II. By the way, why don't you open up a book and learn the brutality of Nicky II's Russification policy in Ukraine???? Or is your Ukrainian flag just to be cool and patriotic in whatever Western cesspool you originate from?
@@kittycatwithinternetaccess2356 Yes, Lenin was so brutal that the Bolsheviks enacted a policy of Ukrainianization in Soviet Ukraine. I guess that was tyrannical back then because Ukraine broke away from Russia's only democracy, right? Stalin had nothing to do with anything with respect to the Bolshevik victory. Silly Westerner.
@@kittycatwithinternetaccess2356 Then why the strong fetish for the Romanovs? You know, Putin's Russia is a hippie commune compared to Czarist Russia. As I said, live up to your "Save Ukraine" nonsense and do some research on Ukraine under Czarist rule.
@@kittycatwithinternetaccess2356 That's my point. You can find nothing to slander the Bolsheviks without resorting to Stalin. Popular tripe prevails over historical fact. The Soviet famine of the 30s was a devastating result of Stalin's economic adventurism of forced collectivization. Nothing more. Now your turn. Tell me ONE thing of Czarist Russia not from the 1997 Don Bluth animated film. I want to know about how wonderful Ukrainians lived in the Czar's democracy that those horrible Bolsheviks destroyed.
The Tsar may have been ill-prepared, but he nor his family were evil. The communist regime was the true evil force, and a simple video or research into recounting the murders of the Romanov family would tell you as much; they were awful murders.
Sharad gautam Tsar Nicholas ii isn't "evil" or a "bad guy" he wasn't prepared physically nor mentally to undergo the responsibility of becoming a high level tsar, ruler of all Russia. But none the less, he nor his family doesn't deserve to be murdered, they could've exiled them, King George brought up sanctuary for them, but later took his offer back, it doesn't matter, they didn't deserve this.
Long live the fallen Bolsheviks who got rid of these devils! Long live Lenin! Long live Stalin! Long live the wisdom of Freidrich and Karl, for they are immortal, and shall rise from the shadows again! Soyuz!
They're living rent free in the heads of disillusioned Middle class American kids who are riddled with debt by taking a useless un-profitable courses such as gender studies or liberal arts.
@@GameSteph dude it wasnt like that the people of the russian empire lived a much better life lol wth are you saying dumbass the ussr took all their money and didnt share it they lettet it for themself lol
The tsar was not a bad man . He just wasnt the right person to become tsar. May they rest in peace...
Nicholas II was his name
@@Luis_Facil I know
@@Luis_Facil Nikolai Alexandrovich Romanov was his name
@Comrade Hellas: I smell a gulag lover.
@@adrianh.3102 Sure, gulags are amazing
It was not an execution. It was murder. Long live the long-dead tsar!
@Churchill AVRE And the Bolsheviks were trash. Too bad it took so long to take them out.
He was not a failure, communist lady, he was the best tsar of all time, his only mistake was he did not eliminate your idol Lenin.
💯
For over 40 years, haven't you heard about the fall of the Berlin Wall and the fall of the communist Soviet Union?
The Communist Party was banned until 2000
the soviet union no longer exists
Yugoslavia no longer exists
Czechoslovakia no longer exists
You're ridiculous and you don't even know it.
She’s a jew
Ты смеешься или вы просто насмотрелись мультика "Анастасия"? Он был ужасным императором, совершенно не понимал, что происходит в народе, настроения, голод населения и эта совершенно ненужная война с Японией, которая и стала началом конца. Вы понятия не имеете, что происходило в ту эпоху в России
He also sent millions of Russians to their death in a war he didn't know how to win even though he had numbers, land and resources. And when people were starving, he didn't care. Say what you want about Lenin, but he gave people what they wanted. Land and bread.
It's a myth that the Russian Empire "was a horrible place", though it was obviously not heaven either, it was just "normal".
What was a horrible place was the Soviet Union that formed later- over 20 million dead thanks to its down governments policies. I dont recall a Tsar that got that many innocents killed in such a short time.
He sent millions to die in a pointless war and ruined his country's economy, and people were starving. He is the reason there was a Soviet Union. He was totally out of touch.
He would have been better off abdicating after 1905 or becoming a Constitutional Monarch. That way he could have lived. But World War I destroyed Russia.
The Tsar wasn't a bad man, he simply was incompetent to handle all the power he had.
McBabwe : I don't think the problem was Nicholas II's reign itself but instead it was the problem of the political autocratic system by which he ruled under. Autocracy may have worked well during the 17th & 18th centuries during the reign of Peter I "aka" (Peter the Great). But it was completely unworkable in the 20th century during Nicholas II's reign. I truly believe that if he had been a constitutional monarch and wasn't forced to meddle in politics that Nicholas II would have been a truly beloved and respected Tsar/Emperor. In that instance the Russian monarchy could have survived instead of suffering the terrible fate of history which actually occured to it.
@@herondelatorre4023 absolutely agree with you. However, one must be said. The great Russian splendour died in the fires of the revolution in 1918.
@@VisithDantanarayana1993 I agree. The great russian splendor of monarchy and the romanovs was replaced by 74 yrs of unbearable communism.
Idiocy knows no bounds. It's easy to cry for the Czar when all you know about Imperial Russia comes from a Don Bluth animated movie. I'm sure the Russian people's new access to secular education, healthcare, literacy, and jobs make Auschwitz look like a family picnic.
@@herondelatorre4023 Russia today is in a pretty good spot, and its culture and its territory are incredible assets. There is still plenty of potential for Russian splendour.
Tsar Nicholas II was in one of the toughest spots anyone could have been as a leader, especially a hereditary leader.
Russia had a history of strong tsars, autocrats and nobility, when the world around it was constitutionalizing. Tsar Nicholas II, as many said, did not think he was going to have to become Tsar of All Russians, but fate had different plans, he wanted a happier and simpler life, but he did what was his duty to the best of his ability. From what I can understand, he felt, along with most people, God selected him to lead his people, to improve the nation out of the 19th century and into the 20th, but due to the Russian-Japanese conflict and communists exploiting the defeat, he really was struggling against an uphill battle.
So, in my opinion, Tsar Nicholas II loved his people, he loved Russia and did the best he could in a really bad situation; and it's important to remember, the short republic after his murder did not last long, at all, it fell incredibly quickly to the USSR.
May the last Tsar, his family, along with those soldiers and civilians who defended the legacy of the Russian people, rest in peace.
satanic luciferian Frankists Jews killed Tzar family ...
Juritsky was Satanic anti jewish ...Frankists sadistic man ,same as Yankel AKA Sverdlov
There are still living members of the house of Romanov. The monarchy can be reinstated.
Yeah, even one of them is already one of rulers in britain
These members hold no legitimacy, the line is dead and... nobody actually supports their restoration in Russia, like literally nobody.
Only problem is that none of the remaining ones are married to or related to other royal families which was a requirement to become the tsar of Russia
@@BartoloVids United Kingdom of GreatBritain - Russian royal families intermarriage dates from the begining till the End of Monarchy.Britain has the First priority to inherit the Throne.
@@ComradeHellas Why are you even here? And also, there are plenty of people in Russia who want to bring back the Monarchy.
I think Alexei breaks my heart the most
12 million Russians that died because the Tsars wouldn't give up, breaks my heart. I give two shits about some royal parasite whose family had more wealth than the city of Moscow produces in an entire year today.
@@ComradeHellas Alexei was a child he was innocent
MissCxJ And he was in constant pain from hemophilia and Rasputin’s “treatments”
Comrade Hellas Also, dude he was 13.
@@makaelaischillin Did you read what I wrote?
May they rest in peace. Lenin was a criminal
Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov
True. Ending the war, bringing free secular education and healthcare to the people, creating jobs, housing, industry and interfering with God's plan for Russia. Horrible man!
I think I have seen somewhere in wikipedia saying that Lenin is not responsible for the execution of the tsar and the rest of the family
We don’t know of Lenin ordered it or not.
God save the Tsar and his family may they rest peacefully. ✝️☦️
They're resting peacefully in the Siberian soil.
Thinking of tsar nicholas makes me so sad
and his family too. RIP
@@yumallah Bro you like being shot to death serveral times?
@@yumallah Oh my Go-
@@yumallah Oh my goodness. What a monster you are !
@@PoffHistory Death For Royalty ..
Everyone Must Have Equal Opportunites No One Special
Today we mourn the losses of the last Tsar and his beautiful family. It’s a terrible part of Russian history. A huge mistake that cannot be compensated.
Russians killed part of their national identity when they allowed such massacre.
May the Romanovs rest In Peace.
😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢
Long live the Russian monarchy.
Saint Tsar Nicholas II, pray for us! 🟨⬛⬜☦️☝️❤️
The movie Anastasia fascinates me about the Romanovs and Russian history, I pray for everyone from Malaysia!
Alexandra Feodrovna was Queen Victoria’s favorite grand daughter. There is a photo of Baby Olga with her great Grandma Queen Victoria, they honestly looked like twins next to each other. If Queen Victoria was alive when Alexandra was murdered I do believe a war could’ve broke out because when Victoria was alive Alexandra was a member of the British Royal family, a close member. But when Victoria’s son became King it kinda changed. She was pushed out of the loop
The rear of her army will be kicked like the Germans and the French
Odd that “Lipman” doesn’t recognize the Tzars greatness
Bring the Tsar monarchy BACK! But into a semi-constitutional monarchy!
With who there is no heir
@@tbphillips9649 someone who treats their subjects as their own flesh and blood, become an elective monarchy.
@@tbphillips9649It doesn’t have to be a direct descendant to Nicholas, they have plenty of siblings, cousins, etc who could easily fill the role.
@@tbphillips9649 there are
NO CONSTITUTIONAL MONARCHY! we want an actual Monarchy!
Holding the monarch accountable was fair,
Blaming the royal consort was expected,
Involving the children was heartless,
The way they were killed was pure evil.
If I was Jewish like Ms Lipman, I'd keep quiet.
Why’s that?
Thanks for praying for my family
I started hating communists after this...
Me too
So? People started hating Lincoln and Grant after reading Gone with the Wind.
@@BolshevikCarpetbagger1917 why are you even bothering? Communism is dead.
@@robi9942 The starvation embargo against Cuba, the sanctions on North Korea, and the war drive against China suggests otherwise.
@@BolshevikCarpetbagger1917 and by looking at India, the Middle East and Europe is suggesting that national socialism is returning. Italy just had an election. China is Not fully communist and Cuba and North Korea are INSIGNIFICANT. Japan can easily destroy North Korea.
He EVEN SAID HE WASNT READY
Lenin was a murduder and the Soviet Union served to fall for what they did to the tazr
Maria Lipman should be asked about Stalin and Lenin and others before she comes to conclude about Nicholas.
That's whataboutism.
@@BolshevikCarpetbagger1917 typical response from a commie
Lenin, the guy who brought peace and unified Russia. Stalin the guy who lead the Soviets against Germany and actually won. I don't think they matter here. The focus is on the tsar and his failures.
Emocionante ver a los rusos recordando el asesinato de esos seres inocentes.
Los hijos eran inocentes, el zar era un incompetente que se escondía tras los lujos de palacio mientras su gente moría de hambre y sus soldados morían en las trincheras.
@@4st7lb25 Parece que no lees nada, el la 1ra guerra mundial el zar tuvo que ir al frente y tomar el mando del regimiento en Stalvka
@@nadir5091 El zar era un mal comandante militar.
@@4st7lb25 el nisiquiera queria ser zar y dijo que no estaba preparado, lo obligaron y en la revolución no tenía casi a nadie de su lado así que nunca pudo hacerle frente a los comunistas, ni adaptarse al trono ya que estuvo siempre en guerras constantes cosa para lo que el no era bueno
Nicholas never wanted to be Tsar. It takes a narcissistic personality to lead, it wasn't in him. I dont think he had a choice when your country, generals and military turn on you. 😒 Either way this is very disturbing, immoral and sad. God bless their souls 🙏 ❤
"It takes a narcissistic personality to lead" this is why women stay out of politics.
@@oboroth51 ong
@@oboroth51 woman staying out of politics? Catherine the Great said otherwise.
@@oboroth51 Women take indirect part in politics.
@@avel3470 catherine the great was a warmonger tho
He was a bad guy but killing his family was one of the most inhuman thing that Lenin has ever done......
Smt X its not done by lenin..its done by bankers
Viktor Orbán your grand father😂😂
Prathap Reddy Edgy, but baseless.
there's no proof lenin was involved with the killing
@@davec1615 On the contrary, there is evidence that Lenin was involved. In the diary of Yurovsky, the chief executioner, he says he got the orders from Lenin, Yakov Sverdlov and one other guy. Whether you want to admit it or not, that right there, is concrete evidence that Lenin indeed was a monster and was involved in killing children just so he wouldn't lose his power. He wasn't a noble man like the communist agenda makes you believe. He was just possibly better than Stalin or Hitler, that's it.
A kingdom wasn't spawned out of thin air, it was built, bricks by bricks.
A king can't claim the throne, he must earn the throne.
Long live the great kings and queens of today and of history.
Quite.
☦️
Nicholas was just clueless what to do
1:00 is a picture of the royal family of Romania and the royal family of Russian Empire.
Any Tsar would be better than the Tyrant now.
@@TheMrPeteChannel whis that?
Who?
Tsar Nicholas the II was not a demon but neither he was an angel but he did not deserve to end like that his family did not deserve that and people need to know that and read more, the Tsar was a man like any other he made mistakes, Lenin and Stalin were much worst then the Romanovs would ever be.
Well done princess Olga suggesting to get marry in Russia back to his own roots in the Orthodox church well done
Never forget the tsar
Tsar Rules
I'm so pleased to see someone from the Romanov still alive h got five children and I hope one day they will have more children princess Olga still Alice I'm glad I read their story and I watch how they where executed very sad how human can do this to another
Al Jazeera always has to complain about Russia and Christianity. Give me a break
thx for the Anastasia movies in 1998, attrach me to know everything about romanov and rusian empire
Maria ( lipman) I smell a jewress.
yup.they are everywhere who cheap money is
yeap a jew
I love it when Czar-lovers expose the true nature of the Russian Empire with their anti-Semitism.
Russia's Jews suffered tremendously under his rule. Do you really expect them to sing his praises?
Everyone seems to have conveniently forgotten about the pogroms.
LETTER SENDING DISABLED BY TH-cam TEAM
Israeli Revolution
Watching the end of nicholas ii rule makes me think of Mohammad Reza Pahlavi the last Emperor of Iran who was also overthrown by a revolution and the Ussr and Islamic Republic of Iran became horrible not giving human rights and made their countries horrible.
His guards massacred men women and children who were protesting that they were staving - that is not an act of a saint.
He didnt order it
@@kittycatwithinternetaccess2356 Imperial guards followed a mandate that was enacted by Czar Nicky II. By the way, why don't you open up a book and learn the brutality of Nicky II's Russification policy in Ukraine???? Or is your Ukrainian flag just to be cool and patriotic in whatever Western cesspool you originate from?
@@kittycatwithinternetaccess2356 Yes, Lenin was so brutal that the Bolsheviks enacted a policy of Ukrainianization in Soviet Ukraine. I guess that was tyrannical back then because Ukraine broke away from Russia's only democracy, right? Stalin had nothing to do with anything with respect to the Bolshevik victory. Silly Westerner.
@@kittycatwithinternetaccess2356 Then why the strong fetish for the Romanovs? You know, Putin's Russia is a hippie commune compared to Czarist Russia. As I said, live up to your "Save Ukraine" nonsense and do some research on Ukraine under Czarist rule.
@@kittycatwithinternetaccess2356 That's my point. You can find nothing to slander the Bolsheviks without resorting to Stalin. Popular tripe prevails over historical fact. The Soviet famine of the 30s was a devastating result of Stalin's economic adventurism of forced collectivization. Nothing more. Now your turn. Tell me ONE thing of Czarist Russia not from the 1997 Don Bluth animated film. I want to know about how wonderful Ukrainians lived in the Czar's democracy that those horrible Bolsheviks destroyed.
Bal shoye spasiba
💝🌙
สงสารครอบครัวพระองค์ท่านมากๆเศร้ามาก
Masacre cobarde
Coward massacre
🤬🤬🤬😤😤
Muderers
Poccya 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111
pUTIN - BUDOUCNOST
The Monarchist shills in the comment section are truly cancerous
You definitely don't understand how a kingdom was built and how a king was chosen
@@popthatbeep I actually do plus have you lived under a corrupt monarchy
Give me Chemotherapy then 😛
it was a beautiful day
Indeed, everyone rejoiced.
@@ComradeHellas and then the soviet union sent them to their death lol
@@haikat4 that was the most beautiful day, Sic semper tyrannis.
Stupid Commie.
Commies are genocidal.
Tsar was reslly bad guy he destroyed everything
Sharad gautam and what about the bolchevicks?
The Tsar was a not the kind of person who should have been ruling an empire nor did he want to but he was never evil.
Zachary Legaspi he was not ready,his father never prepared him to be the Czar
The Tsar may have been ill-prepared, but he nor his family were evil. The communist regime was the true evil force, and a simple video or research into recounting the murders of the Romanov family would tell you as much; they were awful murders.
Sharad gautam
Tsar Nicholas ii isn't "evil" or a "bad guy" he wasn't prepared physically nor mentally to undergo the responsibility of becoming a high level tsar, ruler of all Russia. But none the less, he nor his family doesn't deserve to be murdered, they could've exiled them, King George brought up sanctuary for them, but later took his offer back, it doesn't matter, they didn't deserve this.
Lol long live the Soviet union
Cringe commie
Virgin communist vs chad tsar
@@shlokyadav348 Yes
Soviet LARPer.
Long death to satanic communism 💩💩💩💩💀💀
Long live the fallen Bolsheviks who got rid of these devils! Long live Lenin! Long live Stalin! Long live the wisdom of Freidrich and Karl, for they are immortal, and shall rise from the shadows again! Soyuz!
Stalin kill millions and communist means you be broke and f..k the communist regimes
gaynin
They're living rent free in the heads of disillusioned Middle class American kids who are riddled with debt by taking a useless un-profitable courses such as gender studies or liberal arts.
@@GameSteph dude it wasnt like that the people of the russian empire lived a much better life lol wth are you saying dumbass the ussr took all their money and didnt share it they lettet it for themself lol
@@GameSteph ikr