>"Lolicons am PDF Files guys" >Also makes animations that would be cp by own standards >Gets criticized for it >Spergs out and sends meatriding fanbase to white knight
@@potatortheomnipotentspudaren’t most of his animations specifically satirical parodies of things he finds to be grotesque or creepy, giving reason for his grotesque and creepy animation style? Right? I think a lot of his critics are just a wee bit media illiterate
Lolicon is pure fictional, whereas furry can be both fake and real due to some furries performing sex acts on real animals. So no, he isn't a hypocrite for not liking furry.
Satire or not, he isnt one to talk about fictional content people consume with that kind of crap anyways. Nothing but a bunch of virtue signaling and posturing over fictional crap.
It’s all satire, dark humor, and playing on stereotypes. I never see his actions with bad intent, I think if you see it that way its just not your form of comedy.
Satire is supposed to be funny. (Take South Park, for example, same kind of satire it even uses real-life people, but there is actually a punch line that goes with it. While current meatcanyon is gross just to be gross, which sucks but sum people like it like that)
Gross out shock humor isn’t satire. Satire needs a punchline and an actual comedic critique of what it’s satirizing. Not just drawing a incredibly detailed and gross depiction of said thing.
@@justingibson7807 again, you don't seem to get it at all. Were not trying to cancel him, were just calling out his hypocrisy. If he wants to believe Loli is CP, fine. He can have his garbage take of an opinion. But if he's gunna preach that something is bad, the absolute very least he can do is practice what he's preaching.
@@xxprototypexx5056 I have to ask what is loli then? Why have these fictional characters stylized/inspired by children and act like children. Can’t they act dumb and goofy without acting like children and I can’t help but feel you can convey the same narrative with adults and have the same happiness feeling so many lolicons talk about.
@@bobsummer7987 Loli doesn't mean child, its a body type. Typically small and petite. Ppl associate it with children because that's what they see the model as.
@@xxprototypexx5056 Sorry about the late response. I understand what you’re saying about petite characters in shows automatically being labeled a loli, but can you blame them most shows when introducing a a “loli" character they act like a child. But I also mentioned the narrative itself why is loli character needed in some of these shows, and if it is needed could you please elaborate on why and give me the show’s name.
@@justingibson7807 he wasn't defamed. He made a video that the federal law itself classifies as CP It's why he not only deleted the video, but is also deleting comments calling him out for the tom Brady video. One of the comments got over 400 liked and then was deleted. Gee I wonder why🤔
@@justingibson7807 LMAO "comparing numbers of a ratio, therefore you're wrong". Meat Made a few bad takes and being another hypocrite. Why so defensive? You replied and act all smug. No need to be a sore loser.
More likes than dislikes, and it's been two months. It seems the answer is obvious if there aren't any more "Meatriders" trying to defend the hypocrite.
@@justingibson7807 bro yes it was. It literally meets the definition federal law 1A states is animated CP. He even took the video down because he couod have been jailed 25 to life if he didn't.
@@justingibson7807 no, what's pathetic is that your all being hypocrites and calling Lolis PDF files while defending actual CP. It doesn't matter what personal opinion or belief you have on the subjects. Federal law dictates that the Tom Brady video is CP due to being based on a real child, while Loli isn't due to it being pure fictional. Your opinions and beliefs won't change that. Cry about it.
Birds of a feather flock together. Their defending him because ether they are a hypocrite or PDF file themselves and are trying to look out for one another. Yeah, I know it's absolutely disgusting.
@@justingibson7807 you call us hypocrites, yet you have no logical reason or point as to why were hypocrites. I however can name a few points where you're a straight hypocrite. If mean genuinely considers Loli and Lolicon to be CP even when it's purely fictional, then by his own logic, all of his animations involving child characters in sexual situations should also be considered CP. Especially the Tom Brady video as it's based on a real child from a real incident.
@@justingibson7807 no it doesn't. It's pure fictional and most Lolis and Shota's are depicted as legal age. I'v been told I look 15 even though I'm 26. By your logic, someone liking me would be a PDF file even though I'm legal age.
@@justingibson7807 it doesn't matter if it wasn't shown or glorified. If you think it matters, then you've clearly never heard of implied pornography. Implied pornography is literally a genre of porn, like lesbian or feet porn. It doesn't matter if it wasn't shown or even glorified, implied pornography is still considered pornography.
@@justingibson7807 I feel this is bitterly ironic considering you typed 3 separate replies, all within the hour to emphasize that im deluded. Maybe that glass house needs some reinforcement? Im sensing a cope.
@@kyperactive No joke, this tard justin can't stop commenting if someone makes fun of MeatCanyon or says something good about Rev. And he's acting like others are the ones coping. Massive L.
@@justingibson7807 Obviously not, but if bro is trying to get on lolicons for their enjoyment of fictional content, bro best believe his fictional content, especially one that depicts an actual child, gon get the same scrutiny regardless of the intent. Ya cant make ped jokes in your vids then suddenly call lolicons peds in the same breath, at that point, might as well jail yourself 💀
Damn, a genuinely good animation calling out hypocrisy and all the comments are Papa Meatriders having a meltdown. Sad that this is what these people dedicate their time too. Love the animation by the way. Earned a new subscriber!
Meatcanyon didn't draw lolicon so i have no idea how he's a hypocrite lol. Also has lolicon been normalized or something? How long have I been out of the loop? It's totally fine to like Anime women... that aren't drawn like 4 feet tall, hyper sexualised and also... canonically underage. I don't like the meatcanyon animation but no way could that ever be compared. In fact he purposely didn't show the long kissing (which, it was literally just kissing. Not Shadman stuff) bc he's not that kind of person. The boondocks animators animated R Kelly pissing on a girl. Are you to call them hypocrites for being against R Kelly's actions?
As stated in the video, he once made an animation that was based on a something a real kid experienced, only to make that animation highly exaggerated in a way. That isn't something you can say about lolicon or shotacon, which are based on fictional characters, whether they're canonically "underaged" or not.
Bruh Context - He made animation about Tom Brady situation where Tom after winning Super Bowl kissed his son in a lips and asked the same from him Meatcanyon "Slightly" exaggerated it(huge sarcasm) and remade it like they hightly in love and almost f*cked there(including 'daddy' moaning). While all the reporters were standing nearby watching and filming, clearly enjoying the show (=_=) Oh almost forgot his wife been standing nearby and he hit her few times to go away from him He's hypocrite because of this. Like you can't attack lol*con while doing the same sh*t shadman did not to mention justifying himself that it's just "edgy joke" yea. video with real life kid. K*ssing and moaning while half of the stadium watch and film them and look like they on the verge to bust a nut 💀💀💀 "Just a edgy joke" my a*s
Long story short because youtube don't like details (=_=) He make an VERY exaggerated animation about real life situation. Almost the same bullsh*t Sha*man did (just google his footbal animation) And about lol*con - a long time ago. Since twitter been a thing. For few different reasons but almost all of them the same. people just realized that - yes it's weird! But It harms someone? - no! they fictional! While antis on the other hand actually harm people in many different ways and most of the time outed as predators or hypocrits themselfs (And all that just to boost their morality) It didn't been totally normalized but there totally less hate than before and gained many sympatizers or just people who hate antis more than them To the point that even child protection groups ask to not report it.(for a good reason) And there actual laws with jail time for traying to missrepresent virtual thing as actual real thing The same happened with pr*ship. Even tho they originaly was just chill organisation and then twitter remade them into pe*os just to have scapegoat.
Long story short (=_=) He make an VERY exaggerated animation about real life situation (just google his footbal animation) And about lol*con - a long time ago. Since twitter been a thing. For few different reasons but almost all of them the same. people just realized that - yes it's weird! But It harms someone? - no! they fictional! While antis on the other hand actually h*rm people and most of the time outed as pred*tors or hypocrits themselfs It didn't been totally normalized but there totally less hate than before and gained many sympatizers or just people who hate antis more than them To the point that even protection groups ask to not report it.(for a good reason) And there actual laws with jail time for traying to missrepresent virtual thing as actual real thing The same happened with pr*ship. Even tho they originaly was just chill organisation and then twitter remade them into pe*os just to have scapegoat.
@@PKSuperStar256 Hey. I've also heard that he bought a spicy anime girl figurine of an minor character. If that's true, that's more proof if his hypocrisy.
@@justingibson7807You know I always find it funny how people complain about loli or the sexual content in anime, but they never complain about the sexual content in American cartoon’s like Total Drama or Big Mouth
@@jeromebuck9279cause Big Mouth’s purpose is sorta of that point about Puberty and weird phases you go through as a kid I think my opinion on the whole matter is that both these fuckin douche bags are wrong in some light
@@justingibson7807 Also maybe one of the reasons I defend Lolicons is because I keep noticing a pattern of behavior where people who call lolicons pdf files are either hypocrites or actual pieces of trash
I watched the Tom Brady meat canyon vid and I don’t think it makes him a hypocrite the video didn’t show the kiss and it wasn’t glorying it, it was showing it as something gross But that’s just my opinion Also I find it kinda disturbing that saying “cp is bad” is a hot take nowadays. Also good art btw.
Bruh, saying that loli stuff is on the same level as real cp is insulting. Imagine calling the cops and the cops arrive at the criminal’s house expecting to save a child from sexual assault but nah, they found drawings. Thats it. Nothing, nada. Oh woops, news just said that a pedophile killed their victim after they raped them and would’ve been saved if the officer wasn’t held back from their investigation due to DRAWINGS.
Satire is perfectly fine. However I, and many other people, find it a bit odd that he had made a creepy/edgy animation about a football player kissing his son and include the on-lookers in the animation licking their lips and what not, as well as the magic school bus animation where the kids take a trip in miss frizzle's hew-ha, but he than calls people predators over fictional content. It's just really strange. Also, no one's saying that CP isn't bad. Not liking loli/shota content is completely fine, you can find it gross, weird, disgusting or so forth, but I genuinely do not think that saying "Don't call someone a bad person over fictional content" is the same as defending cp/actual predators. As it doesn't have the practical means of being labeled as such, due to it being purely fictional artwork that doesn't hurt or exploit actual kids, also i've seen instances were the people who do treat this as cp have made police reports about it, which wastes resources that can help actual victims of real abuse, along with there being no study of this stuff directly linking to predatory behavior, I just don't think bizarre artwork is as important as real victims. Also, I genuinely appreciate your comment about my artwork. Your civility and kindness is highly appreciated < 3
you realize that people who watch animated cp, are imageining that child being real, and get aroused by it, how is that not pedophilia, you get aroused by children, doesnt matter if its real or not thats still literally pedophilia, if a person imagines a child, and they get aroused, thats fictional, they are still the definition of a fucking pedophile.@@RinnMayy
@@RinnMayy Lolicon content is considered CP in the U.S. Hey guys this is an edit I just found out Lolicon COULD be considered cp, Yeah it COULD be illegal if it's really graphic like $ex, but some loli is not illegal because it does not have any graphic content..
@@joshjess9841 At least Meatcanyon's artstyle isn't as cringe as this one. Literally 99% of people who draw like this are terminally online losers who also happen to be pedos
@@joshjess9841 His media is made for comedy reasons, anime does it to get a sexual rise out of the viewers. The intellectual dishonesty of this comparison is mind-blowing.
Meat canyon wasn't sexualizing the child, he was making a joke about it. He didn't make the video for people to masturbate to it, unlike all the lolicon content you people defend. Actually unintelligent beings...
@@PCCrasher42069 They made a statement about the video. I'm interested, and I would just like to hear them clarify how the RinnMayy is "missing the point". It's cool if they don't feel like taking time to explain. I feel like I might already know the answer, anyway.
@@joshjess9841 The point is that this video makes a strawman of Meatcanyon, using audio with no contex to try to paint him as some sort of weirdo himself. The video itself the audio is from hides most of the screen and focuses on the audience disgust and shock at what Tom Brady's caricature is doing. If you don't get it, is meant to mock and deride Tom Brady and not to sexualizie Brady's son. Most of Meatcanyon's videos are of a similar nature. Satirical parodies with gross and exaggerated versions of real people and or fictional characters. I mean is the same reason people get away drawing parodies of politicans and public figures being mutilated or beat up, compare all that to what Meatcanyon is doing by not showing everything in excessive detail and notice is far from as offensive. I don' think it makes Meatycanyon a hypocrite in any way to point out people don't have to draw or support the sexualisation of children in media, whilst also creating a parody that eldues to how gross intimate acts with children are. Do I think Tom Brady is a pedophile? No. Was the parody a real low blow? Yes, I wouldn't make something like that, but I can tell what the intent of that video was. I can't say I understand the moral reasoning and intent behind those that defend Loli media which makes bank off appealing to the very things Meatcanyon is trying to mock and go against. By the way, the creator of this video has #revsaysdesu as a tag. That channel goes after anybody that critize Lolicons and drawn media. This rant is not about him in specific but let's say I don't feel the need to spare my good will with people who side alongside Rev.
I follow Rev but I don't get it. There's a clear difference between a guy making purposely grotesque satire and instances like Vaush were he gas more lewd art than most of what meat canyon really has. If you dont like ita videos, that's fine, but its not good proof that he's a hypocrite. Also, which video that he made thats basedan actual event? Cause half of his videos are based around real events so you have to be specific.
And yet at no point in the video does it feel like it's supposed to hot or glorified. It's supposed to be gross and uncomfortable. The thing you basement dwellers keep pushing aside is INTENT.
Cope, Meat-rider. He's a hypocrite by his own standard and having to simply accept that is like fucking kryptonite to you goons, just like hearing the utterance of a simple 4-letter L-word causes you to want to peel off all your skin. It's really pathetic and it continues to show ever further your delusion and lacking of self-awareness with how you all basically want to condemn people for watching anime, NOT condemn people who unironically want to be with real minors, or individuals who genuinely advocate for the age of consent in the U.S. to be lowered to normalize adults having relationships with actual kids. You antis want to clutch your pearls around Japanese anime art that feature lolis, and you wanna cry and fret about the "INTENT" of it, but when you turn and look in the direction of western-made animated media that feature characters that ARE intended to be minors, and DO have the intent of being sexualized... *crickets. Absolute crickets from you hypocritical normies. You only seem to despise the sexualization of minors being sexualized in art and animation ONLY when it comes to anime & manga, because you hate that, but you give Meatcanyon a pass when he does it, because it's done for "sATiRe". You claim to wanna "eliminate the depictions of sexualization children", which you think lolicons created and glorify, but you what you REALLY mean is "nah, forget actual victims of CP and CSEM. Let's go mess with and bully people who consume fictional anime content. That's way easier and it makes it look like we're fighting for a just cause. You antis are like politicians without any significant influence: you have your campaign, you have your designated moral-panic as a target, yet despite how hard you shame & condemn & attack that moral-panic (anime and weebs), guess what? It's doing literally NOTHING to stop or deter actual sickos and chomos from targeting actual minors in real life.
Intent doesn’t matter. The people who made Cuties “intended” to showcase how children were being treated in Hollywood or something to the effect. It didn’t work at all and everyone hated it. Why would this be any different? He created a scene that depicted a real life father and son in an explicit manner, and it doesn’t matter if you don’t actually see what they are doing, a cameraman was licking his lips, obviously aroused, and you can clearly hear moaning of some kind, too. And not the moaning in pain kind of moaning.
Coming back to this, I see the comment I made criticizing OP, as long of an essay it was, wound up getting deleted. I didn't even get a notification from TH-cam about whether what I said violated TOSn nor given warning like in the past. That's neat. I guess it was because I had a lot to say, and YT just deletes certain comments that are long after being posted.
papemeat made video talking about how lolis and shotas are creepy and rev got mad and called him (papameat) a pedo for an old animation parodying tom brady and his son even though to this day he does not like the animation and admits it is weird also rev is a lolicon so he has no room to talk
No meatcanyon is not a hypocrite becuse his videos are not supposed to be sexual. He does not make his videos with the intent of people waking off to them. they are supposed to be disturbing your supposed to acknowledge what you looking at is disgusting. Vaush had lolicon which is supposed to be sexual anime kids so no meat canyon is not a hypocrite.
He is since it's still a depiction of such no matter if it's for "comedy" or not, in fact it's worse since MeatCanyon made one specifically based on a real event involving someone who was a minor at that time. If it were a joke, it would actually be funny. Lolicon is different since it ONLY applies to fictional anime girls with short and petite body types with cutesy aesthetics.
@@PKSuperStar256 1: humor is subjective 2: the intent of the material absolutely matters might I add that meatcanyon has never drawn any explicit nudity of a child 3:…you wouldn’t happen to be a fan of… lolicon would you?
@@hammishhiggins153, 1. You don't depict real minors in "that" way. 2. The intention of the material doesn't always matter. Since MeatCanyon made a video based on a real event involving someone who was a minor at the time, that automatically makes that media exploitative, which is something you can never say about media involving only fictional characters. 3. No, I'm not. I don't like it and I personally don't want to see it. However, I believe it should be okay to be one and like lolicon material since all it involves is fictional anime girls with small body types, whether they're "underaged"/have a childish personality or not.
Bro @RinnMayy you kind of missed the point from the Meat Canyon Tom Brady video it was satire and the lolly video was about people putting children into suggestive themes like showing more of their skin, brother the Tom Brady video did not even show the making out scene, Meat Canyon just made wired noises. DO YOUR REASEARCH!!!
he still used a real kid in the video while anime lolis are not real and are just cartoons, now the moment actual kids get involved it is understandable
@@crawlingboy Did meat really showed the scene? It just cut to people looking at it in the background disgusted. NO he did not sexualize Brady's son you could see because of the art style meat canyon makes people look ugly and unattractive.
@@xxprototypexx5056 Hey forgot about this comment here mainly cause I have a life outside of TH-cam unlike you. But justingibson7807 just explained it. Have a good day!
@@justingibson7807 Loli and Lolicon is not Animated CP. The law directly states so long as the animation isn't depicting anything resembling a REAL LIFE CHILD, it's not classified as CP. Just because you personally believe it is, doesn't mean your personal belief is fact. If anything your a hypocrite because the guy your defending actually did draw legally classified Animated CP.
Lol dude. Revs such a waste of space. Makes no actual content. Complains about whatever can get him views. Meatcanyon makes content, dosent have a online show whoes entire thing is complaining about "wokeness" rev doesn't even knows what woke means but uses it to trigger the tiny manlets that watch him. Worst part is he always claims hs being attacked while being SHOVE down my throat on the feed. Even when i activly say sont show his channel.
The context for the video is complex. To summarize it, there is a streamer known as Vaush who has constantly made stances against lolicons, when he accidentally leaked his NSFW folder on-stream, with several of the displayed images having loli characters (with possibly more as there are folders within the one displayed). MeatCanyon hears of this to make a video to basically slander lolicons as "those who like the real life equivalent". Then Rev notices and makes a video criticizing MeatCanyon for hypocrisy as several of his animations feature underaged characters in "interesting situations" as well as the fact that one of them was a depiction of a real life event involving someone who was a child when that video specific was made.
He made a video calling Loli and loli-cons pedos for liking fictional characters when he made an animation of a real incident involving Tom Brady kissing his son in a very inappropriate way as well as having underage fictional characters like Ben 10 and other kid characters in sexual situations. The Tom Brady animation in particular is actually legally classified as CP, as it is depicting real people from a real incident, Essentially making him a massive hypocrite.
@@justingibson7807 Jokes are literally used by PDF files to justify talking about their fantasies of children. There is no excuse for making a skit about a real child from a real incident.
So would a sound only recording of an irl child getting the deed done to them not be considered CP by your own standards since it's not shown? @@justingibson7807
"You see I depicted one as a soyjack and the other one as a chad so I must be right!"
"It's over! I depict you as a soy wojak and myself as a chad wojak! I won!"
I’m pretty sure meat canyon just transforms into a monster like his animation
>"Lolicons am PDF Files guys"
>Also makes animations that would be cp by own standards
>Gets criticized for it
>Spergs out and sends meatriding fanbase to white knight
@@potatortheomnipotentspudaren’t most of his animations specifically satirical parodies of things he finds to be grotesque or creepy, giving reason for his grotesque and creepy animation style? Right? I think a lot of his critics are just a wee bit media illiterate
ending caught me so off-guard
Danm the reditors discord mods and genshin impact players really cooked this video up🔥💯🔥🔥
yes sir
We are getting the upvotes and kittens with this one 🗣🔥🔥🔥🤘🤘🤘🧊🧊🧊🥶🥶🥶
The fact that this guy made a genshin impact animation
How many antis ended up hypocrites? I've already lost the count. Anyway, great job! Rev looks cute.
@justingibson7807 how does that make him a hypocrite?
@@justingibson7807 what
@@justingibson7807 You don't know what the word Hypocrite means.
@@justingibson7807 They're both fiction.
Lolicon is pure fictional, whereas furry can be both fake and real due to some furries performing sex acts on real animals.
So no, he isn't a hypocrite for not liking furry.
Satire or not, he isnt one to talk about fictional content people consume with that kind of crap anyways.
Nothing but a bunch of virtue signaling and posturing over fictional crap.
It’s all satire, dark humor, and playing on stereotypes. I never see his actions with bad intent, I think if you see it that way its just not your form of comedy.
Satire is supposed to be funny. (Take South Park, for example, same kind of satire it even uses real-life people, but there is actually a punch line that goes with it. While current meatcanyon is gross just to be gross, which sucks but sum people like it like that)
@@zetao2 th-cam.com/video/eTsAvkYofj8/w-d-xo.htmlsi=oKXR-Xtvk2-SebJJ
Gross out shock humor isn’t satire. Satire needs a punchline and an actual comedic critique of what it’s satirizing. Not just drawing a incredibly detailed and gross depiction of said thing.
@@zetao2yeah South Park where in the game you twerk on 2 drunk guys as a 4th grader. Just because a joke didn't hit it doesn't discredit it.
You do realize that's unironically how Shadman defended his drawings, right?
You can tell this video hits home from all the anti's maulding in the comment section.
@@justingibson7807 again, you don't seem to get it at all. Were not trying to cancel him, were just calling out his hypocrisy.
If he wants to believe Loli is CP, fine. He can have his garbage take of an opinion. But if he's gunna preach that something is bad, the absolute very least he can do is practice what he's preaching.
you LIKE CHILDREN 💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀
@@xxprototypexx5056 I have to ask what is loli then? Why have these fictional characters stylized/inspired by children and act like children. Can’t they act dumb and goofy without acting like children and I can’t help but feel you can convey the same narrative with adults and have the same happiness feeling so many lolicons talk about.
@@bobsummer7987 Loli doesn't mean child, its a body type. Typically small and petite. Ppl associate it with children because that's what they see the model as.
@@xxprototypexx5056 Sorry about the late response. I understand what you’re saying about petite characters in shows automatically being labeled a loli, but can you blame them most shows when introducing a a “loli" character they act like a child. But I also mentioned the narrative itself why is loli character needed in some of these shows, and if it is needed could you please elaborate on why and give me the show’s name.
"he's a hypocrite therefore we're fine" is not a good argument either.
FBI here.
Thank you for your report.
We have this user MeatCanyon in our watchlist.
@@justingibson7807 Stop wasting our time or you'll go to jail for defamation.
@@F_B_I_xyou need to give your guys some coffee for your hard work
@@justingibson7807 he wasn't defamed. He made a video that the federal law itself classifies as CP
It's why he not only deleted the video, but is also deleting comments calling him out for the tom Brady video. One of the comments got over 400 liked and then was deleted.
Gee I wonder why🤔
@@justingibson7807 Not looking good so far. Tom Brady's family asked for a restriction order.
I kneel... Legit king shit.
I like the animation, the way you drew rev was cute :3
Thank you ❤
bro is making this video like meatcanyon even knows he exists
meatcanyon exist for real?
Meatcanyon is not even exist
@@reinaters Grammer Nice
That's what satire and criticism is the same thing as Meat Canyon's video.
You talk as if he cares about meatcanyons existence. Lol
Another W for Rev, also nice animation
Rev says W. Thank you by the way
@@RinnMayy No prob, love your art style.
@@justingibson7807 You're the only one coping here. But Nice try.
@@justingibson7807 LMAO "comparing numbers of a ratio, therefore you're wrong". Meat Made a few bad takes and being another hypocrite. Why so defensive? You replied and act all smug. No need to be a sore loser.
@@justingibson7807 Oh come on, you're still malding? Move on! You reek of tism. XD
More likes than dislikes, and it's been two months. It seems the answer is obvious if there aren't any more "Meatriders" trying to defend the hypocrite.
th-cam.com/video/eTsAvkYofj8/w-d-xo.htmlsi=oKXR-Xtvk2-SebJJ
I'm done with the "Meatcanyon is an hypocrite" BS.
Edit: Why is there an full uno match in replies? 😭
I'm done with "loli is p3d0" BS
anime watching pedos stay mad
He is
No you guys are spreading misinformation, did you even watch the papa meat video???
@@logicallouis543 *Loud incorrect buzzer sound*
MeatCanyon is gonna be Vaush 2.0. Nice animation btw
@@justingibson7807Cope
@@justingibson7807keep self reporting by defending a guy that made actual CP.
@@justingibson7807 bro yes it was. It literally meets the definition federal law 1A states is animated CP.
He even took the video down because he couod have been jailed 25 to life if he didn't.
@@justingibson7807 yes he did dude, it literally meets the definition that federal law states is CP.
@@justingibson7807 no, what's pathetic is that your all being hypocrites and calling Lolis PDF files while defending actual CP.
It doesn't matter what personal opinion or belief you have on the subjects.
Federal law dictates that the Tom Brady video is CP due to being based on a real child, while Loli isn't due to it being pure fictional.
Your opinions and beliefs won't change that. Cry about it.
Damn, why are there so many Papameat riders in this comment section?
Birds of a feather flock together.
Their defending him because ether they are a hypocrite or PDF file themselves and are trying to look out for one another.
Yeah, I know it's absolutely disgusting.
@@justingibson7807 you call us hypocrites, yet you have no logical reason or point as to why were hypocrites.
I however can name a few points where you're a straight hypocrite.
If mean genuinely considers Loli and Lolicon to be CP even when it's purely fictional, then by his own logic, all of his animations involving child characters in sexual situations should also be considered CP. Especially the Tom Brady video as it's based on a real child from a real incident.
@@justingibson7807 no it doesn't. It's pure fictional and most Lolis and Shota's are depicted as legal age.
I'v been told I look 15 even though I'm 26. By your logic, someone liking me would be a PDF file even though I'm legal age.
@@justingibson7807 it doesn't matter if it wasn't shown or glorified. If you think it matters, then you've clearly never heard of implied pornography.
Implied pornography is literally a genre of porn, like lesbian or feet porn. It doesn't matter if it wasn't shown or even glorified, implied pornography is still considered pornography.
@@justingibson7807 but I'm not 18, I'm 26. Well beyond the age limit, so idk why you even brought that up.
Pretty neat ~
Could be enhanced, but I love smug expression in 1st image. Quite on point!
meatcanyon is real??????
Apparently so. Shit, no one told me either.
@@pmp7922 IKR!!!! WHY DID NOONE TELL ME!!!!!!!
The Beat Meat Nation didnt like this one 😤
They just cant handle reality 😎
I know, they are so fragile.
Chad Rev won.
@@justingibson7807 I feel this is bitterly ironic considering you typed 3 separate replies, all within the hour to emphasize that im deluded.
Maybe that glass house needs some reinforcement? Im sensing a cope.
@@kyperactive No joke, this tard justin can't stop commenting if someone makes fun of MeatCanyon or says something good about Rev. And he's acting like others are the ones coping. Massive L.
@@justingibson7807you’re defending meatcanyon pretty hard? hypocrite much?
@@justingibson7807 Obviously not, but if bro is trying to get on lolicons for their enjoyment of fictional content, bro best believe his fictional content, especially one that depicts an actual child, gon get the same scrutiny regardless of the intent.
Ya cant make ped jokes in your vids then suddenly call lolicons peds in the same breath, at that point, might as well jail yourself 💀
Damn, a genuinely good animation calling out hypocrisy and all the comments are Papa Meatriders having a meltdown. Sad that this is what these people dedicate their time too.
Love the animation by the way. Earned a new subscriber!
th-cam.com/video/eTsAvkYofj8/w-d-xo.htmlsi=oKXR-Xtvk2-SebJJ
ANIMATED CHILDREN FETISHES ARE WEIRD AND PAPA IS NOT A HYPO FOR TRYING TO MAKE A SATIRE VID BUT TURNED OUT WRONG
Genuinely good animation? Okay?
I love meat canyon but that Brady video was very sus
@@smartyjess94 I never found any of his "Satire" anything more than deep as a puddle anyways.
I swear it's used as a excuse to defend badly made crap.
If he had just kept his mouth shut and didn't pull that card then he wouldn't of got hate
Meatcanyon didn't draw lolicon so i have no idea how he's a hypocrite lol. Also has lolicon been normalized or something? How long have I been out of the loop?
It's totally fine to like Anime women... that aren't drawn like 4 feet tall, hyper sexualised and also... canonically underage.
I don't like the meatcanyon animation but no way could that ever be compared. In fact he purposely didn't show the long kissing (which, it was literally just kissing. Not Shadman stuff) bc he's not that kind of person. The boondocks animators animated R Kelly pissing on a girl. Are you to call them hypocrites for being against R Kelly's actions?
As stated in the video, he once made an animation that was based on a something a real kid experienced, only to make that animation highly exaggerated in a way. That isn't something you can say about lolicon or shotacon, which are based on fictional characters, whether they're canonically "underaged" or not.
Bruh
Context - He made animation about Tom Brady situation where Tom after winning Super Bowl kissed his son in a lips and asked the same from him
Meatcanyon "Slightly" exaggerated it(huge sarcasm) and remade it like they hightly in love and almost f*cked there(including 'daddy' moaning).
While all the reporters were standing nearby watching and filming, clearly enjoying the show (=_=)
Oh almost forgot his wife been standing nearby and he hit her few times to go away from him
He's hypocrite because of this. Like you can't attack lol*con while doing the same sh*t shadman did
not to mention justifying himself that it's just "edgy joke"
yea. video with real life kid. K*ssing and moaning while half of the stadium watch and film them and look like they on the verge to bust a nut 💀💀💀
"Just a edgy joke" my a*s
Long story short because youtube don't like details (=_=)
He make an VERY exaggerated animation about real life situation. Almost the same bullsh*t Sha*man did
(just google his footbal animation)
And about lol*con - a long time ago. Since twitter been a thing.
For few different reasons but almost all of them the same.
people just realized that - yes it's weird!
But It harms someone? - no! they fictional!
While antis on the other hand actually harm people in many different ways and most of the time outed as predators or hypocrits themselfs
(And all that just to boost their morality)
It didn't been totally normalized but there totally less hate than before and gained many sympatizers or just people who hate antis more than them
To the point that even child protection groups ask to not report it.(for a good reason)
And there actual laws with jail time for traying to missrepresent virtual thing as actual real thing
The same happened with pr*ship. Even tho they originaly was just chill organisation and then twitter remade them into pe*os just to have scapegoat.
Long story short (=_=)
He make an VERY exaggerated animation about real life situation
(just google his footbal animation)
And about lol*con - a long time ago. Since twitter been a thing.
For few different reasons but almost all of them the same.
people just realized that - yes it's weird!
But It harms someone? - no! they fictional!
While antis on the other hand actually h*rm people and most of the time outed as pred*tors or hypocrits themselfs
It didn't been totally normalized but there totally less hate than before and gained many sympatizers or just people who hate antis more than them
To the point that even protection groups ask to not report it.(for a good reason)
And there actual laws with jail time for traying to missrepresent virtual thing as actual real thing
The same happened with pr*ship. Even tho they originaly was just chill organisation and then twitter remade them into pe*os just to have scapegoat.
@@PKSuperStar256 Hey. I've also heard that he bought a spicy anime girl figurine of an minor character. If that's true, that's more proof if his hypocrisy.
W rev says desu
@@justingibson7807 At least Rev isn’t a hypocrite
@@justingibson7807You know I always find it funny how people complain about loli or the sexual content in anime, but they never complain about the sexual content in American cartoon’s like Total Drama or Big Mouth
@@jeromebuck9279cause Big Mouth’s purpose is sorta of that point about Puberty and weird phases you go through as a kid I think my opinion on the whole matter is that both these fuckin douche bags are wrong in some light
@@jeromebuck9279 Tbh both shows are tasteless and unfunny compared to Loli content because at least they are braindead to the point it's funny.
@@justingibson7807 Also maybe one of the reasons I defend Lolicons is because I keep noticing a pattern of behavior where people who call lolicons pdf files are either hypocrites or actual pieces of trash
I watched the Tom Brady meat canyon vid and I don’t think it makes him a hypocrite the video didn’t show the kiss and it wasn’t glorying it, it was showing it as something gross
But that’s just my opinion
Also I find it kinda disturbing that saying “cp is bad” is a hot take nowadays.
Also good art btw.
Bruh, saying that loli stuff is on the same level as real cp is insulting. Imagine calling the cops and the cops arrive at the criminal’s house expecting to save a child from sexual assault but nah, they found drawings. Thats it. Nothing, nada. Oh woops, news just said that a pedophile killed their victim after they raped them and would’ve been saved if the officer wasn’t held back from their investigation due to DRAWINGS.
Satire is perfectly fine. However I, and many other people, find it a bit odd that he had made a creepy/edgy animation about a football player kissing his son and include the on-lookers in the animation licking their lips and what not, as well as the magic school bus animation where the kids take a trip in miss frizzle's hew-ha, but he than calls people predators over fictional content.
It's just really strange.
Also, no one's saying that CP isn't bad.
Not liking loli/shota content is completely fine, you can find it gross, weird, disgusting or so forth, but I genuinely do not think that saying "Don't call someone a bad person over fictional content" is the same as defending cp/actual predators.
As it doesn't have the practical means of being labeled as such, due to it being purely fictional artwork that doesn't hurt or exploit actual kids, also i've seen instances were the people who do treat this as cp have made police reports about it, which wastes resources that can help actual victims of real abuse, along with there being no study of this stuff directly linking to predatory behavior, I just don't think bizarre artwork is as important as real victims.
Also, I genuinely appreciate your comment about my artwork. Your civility and kindness is highly appreciated < 3
@@RinnMayyunless you have people who watched the Vice interview which basically glorified an actual offender’s time
you realize that people who watch animated cp, are imageining that child being real, and get aroused by it, how is that not pedophilia, you get aroused by children, doesnt matter if its real or not thats still literally pedophilia, if a person imagines a child, and they get aroused, thats fictional, they are still the definition of a fucking pedophile.@@RinnMayy
@@RinnMayy Lolicon content is considered CP in the U.S.
Hey guys this is an edit I just found out Lolicon COULD be considered cp, Yeah it COULD be illegal if it's really graphic like $ex, but some loli is not illegal because it does not have any graphic content..
A hater of MeatCanyon is a friend of mine, especially for his treatment of an editor of his…
Whoever animated this must be a real weirdo
Then Meatcanyon's also a weirdo cuz he makes it his living off of animating weird stuff, be it satirical or not.
looking at this animators account yeahh
@@joshjess9841 At least Meatcanyon's artstyle isn't as cringe as this one. Literally 99% of people who draw like this are terminally online losers who also happen to be pedos
@@joshjess9841 His media is made for comedy reasons, anime does it to get a sexual rise out of the viewers. The intellectual dishonesty of this comparison is mind-blowing.
@@SublethalCat So sexualizing kids is ok as long as you have a good reason for it? Where have I heard that one before?
At least that awful meatcanyon video got me this good cartoon to laugh at.
Meat canyon wasn't sexualizing the child, he was making a joke about it. He didn't make the video for people to masturbate to it, unlike all the lolicon content you people defend. Actually unintelligent beings...
@@justingibson7807 fr
@@justingibson7807If he watched it, then he'd have seen CP, as it was based on a real child.
@@justingibson7807 keep self reporting by defending the guy who made what federal law itself defines as CP.
Me when I'm at the "missing the point" competition and my opponent is @RinnMayy.
What's the point then, hm? Tell me, what's the point that this person RinnMayy here is missing?
@@joshjess9841lmfao do you not expect them to have a response
@@PCCrasher42069 They made a statement about the video. I'm interested, and I would just like to hear them clarify how the RinnMayy is "missing the point".
It's cool if they don't feel like taking time to explain. I feel like I might already know the answer, anyway.
@@joshjess9841 The point is that this video makes a strawman of Meatcanyon, using audio with no contex to try to paint him as some sort of weirdo himself. The video itself the audio is from hides most of the screen and focuses on the audience disgust and shock at what Tom Brady's caricature is doing. If you don't get it, is meant to mock and deride Tom Brady and not to sexualizie Brady's son. Most of Meatcanyon's videos are of a similar nature. Satirical parodies with gross and exaggerated versions of real people and or fictional characters. I mean is the same reason people get away drawing parodies of politicans and public figures being mutilated or beat up, compare all that to what Meatcanyon is doing by not showing everything in excessive detail and notice is far from as offensive.
I don' think it makes Meatycanyon a hypocrite in any way to point out people don't have to draw or support the sexualisation of children in media, whilst also creating a parody that eldues to how gross intimate acts with children are. Do I think Tom Brady is a pedophile? No. Was the parody a real low blow? Yes, I wouldn't make something like that, but I can tell what the intent of that video was. I can't say I understand the moral reasoning and intent behind those that defend Loli media which makes bank off appealing to the very things Meatcanyon is trying to mock and go against.
By the way, the creator of this video has #revsaysdesu as a tag. That channel goes after anybody that critize Lolicons and drawn media. This rant is not about him in specific but let's say I don't feel the need to spare my good will with people who side alongside Rev.
@@PCCrasher42069 Lmfao do not speak on others behalf.
Using rev to make a point backfired heavily
I follow Rev but I don't get it. There's a clear difference between a guy making purposely grotesque satire and instances like Vaush were he gas more lewd art than most of what meat canyon really has. If you dont like ita videos, that's fine, but its not good proof that he's a hypocrite.
Also, which video that he made thats basedan actual event? Cause half of his videos are based around real events so you have to be specific.
It's ok for Rev to jerk off to loli but not Vaush?
Wasn't Rev a Loli apologist?
There nothing wrong about being a lolicon. It's literally defended by federal law 1A
@@justingibson7807 yes it is.
@@justingibson7807read the law.
It is.
Read the law. It is. If anything, meatcanyons video of Tom bradys SON violates the federal law, since it depicts ACTUAL minors dude...
@@justingibson7807
It doesn't matter. He represented a real minor in media in a sexual way.
And yet at no point in the video does it feel like it's supposed to hot or glorified. It's supposed to be gross and uncomfortable. The thing you basement dwellers keep pushing aside is INTENT.
Cope, Meat-rider. He's a hypocrite by his own standard and having to simply accept that is like fucking kryptonite to you goons, just like hearing the utterance of a simple 4-letter L-word causes you to want to peel off all your skin. It's really pathetic and it continues to show ever further your delusion and lacking of self-awareness with how you all basically want to condemn people for watching anime, NOT condemn people who unironically want to be with real minors, or individuals who genuinely advocate for the age of consent in the U.S. to be lowered to normalize adults having relationships with actual kids.
You antis want to clutch your pearls around Japanese anime art that feature lolis, and you wanna cry and fret about the "INTENT" of it, but when you turn and look in the direction of western-made animated media that feature characters that ARE intended to be minors, and DO have the intent of being sexualized... *crickets. Absolute crickets from you hypocritical normies. You only seem to despise the sexualization of minors being sexualized in art and animation ONLY when it comes to anime & manga, because you hate that, but you give Meatcanyon a pass when he does it, because it's done for "sATiRe".
You claim to wanna "eliminate the depictions of sexualization children", which you think lolicons created and glorify, but you what you REALLY mean is "nah, forget actual victims of CP and CSEM. Let's go mess with and bully people who consume fictional anime content. That's way easier and it makes it look like we're fighting for a just cause.
You antis are like politicians without any significant influence: you have your campaign, you have your designated moral-panic as a target, yet despite how hard you shame & condemn & attack that moral-panic (anime and weebs), guess what? It's doing literally NOTHING to stop or deter actual sickos and chomos from targeting actual minors in real life.
Intent doesn’t matter. The people who made Cuties “intended” to showcase how children were being treated in Hollywood or something to the effect. It didn’t work at all and everyone hated it. Why would this be any different? He created a scene that depicted a real life father and son in an explicit manner, and it doesn’t matter if you don’t actually see what they are doing, a cameraman was licking his lips, obviously aroused, and you can clearly hear moaning of some kind, too. And not the moaning in pain kind of moaning.
@@breecegriffith5896 cuties used REAL children. Meatcanyon did not.
Coming back to this, I see the comment I made criticizing OP, as long of an essay it was, wound up getting deleted. I didn't even get a notification from TH-cam about whether what I said violated TOSn nor given warning like in the past. That's neat.
I guess it was because I had a lot to say, and YT just deletes certain comments that are long after being posted.
@leoscrymgeour5881 uh no he didn't. In case you didn't make it past kindergarten. Cartoons are not real. 🫨
Someone fill me in, on the comments here calling everyone and each other a "meatrider". Wtf are y'all on about.
It's a wordplay on Papa Meat's name for his fans who blindly follow him.
papemeat made video talking about how lolis and shotas are creepy and rev got mad and called him (papameat) a pedo for an old animation parodying tom brady and his son even though to this day he does not like the animation and admits it is weird also rev is a lolicon so he has no room to talk
@@oneagainst1999 Bro has a wife
@@oneagainst1999 Parody does not mean you get a pass from scrutiny.
Based. So fuckin zased.
Zased. Lol
Man, do we even gotta?
I love how ur calling him out as ur the one who’s dressed as a gong girl
>t.Didn’t follow the drama
Person who made this video isn't even the one who called him out as one lmao.
we makin it out of delulu land with this one
No meatcanyon is not a hypocrite becuse his videos are not supposed to be sexual. He does not make his videos with the intent of people waking off to them. they are supposed to be disturbing your supposed to acknowledge what you looking at is disgusting.
Vaush had lolicon which is supposed to be sexual anime kids so no meat canyon is not a hypocrite.
He is since it's still a depiction of such no matter if it's for "comedy" or not, in fact it's worse since MeatCanyon made one specifically based on a real event involving someone who was a minor at that time. If it were a joke, it would actually be funny.
Lolicon is different since it ONLY applies to fictional anime girls with short and petite body types with cutesy aesthetics.
@@PKSuperStar256
1: humor is subjective
2: the intent of the material absolutely matters might I add that meatcanyon has never drawn any explicit nudity of a child
3:…you wouldn’t happen to be a fan of… lolicon would you?
@@hammishhiggins153, 1. You don't depict real minors in "that" way.
2. The intention of the material doesn't always matter. Since MeatCanyon made a video based on a real event involving someone who was a minor at the time, that automatically makes that media exploitative, which is something you can never say about media involving only fictional characters.
3. No, I'm not. I don't like it and I personally don't want to see it. However, I believe it should be okay to be one and like lolicon material since all it involves is fictional anime girls with small body types, whether they're "underaged"/have a childish personality or not.
@@PKSuperStar256 what video involving “real minors are you referring to?
@@hammishhiggins153, the Tom Brady video MeatCanyon made.
Edit: Which is the main subject of the animation this comment section is attached to.
it's called satire
Honestly I dont like RevSaysDesu a lot more so I dont really care for this whole drama.
Yet you commented
Bro @RinnMayy you kind of missed the point from the Meat Canyon Tom Brady video it was satire and the lolly video was about people putting children into suggestive themes like showing more of their skin, brother the Tom Brady video did not even show the making out scene, Meat Canyon just made wired noises. DO YOUR REASEARCH!!!
he still used a real kid in the video while anime lolis are not real and are just cartoons, now the moment actual kids get involved it is understandable
@@crawlingboy Did meat really showed the scene? It just cut to people looking at it in the background disgusted. NO he did not sexualize Brady's son you could see because of the art style meat canyon makes people look ugly and unattractive.
Ehh agree to disagree @@crawlingboy
so it’s okay when it’s a real child but not when it’s fiction?
No@@strikeatnyte Meat did not sexualize Brady's kid or glorify the actions of what happened. That was my point.
Difference is that meatcanyons content isn’t supposed to be attractive.
I thought it worked?
not saying that meat canyons right but rev is equally as terrible
No meat is the worst.
Explain how Rev is also terrible.
9 days later, still waiting for your reasoning on how revs bad.
@@xxprototypexx5056 Hey forgot about this comment here mainly cause I have a life outside of TH-cam unlike you. But justingibson7807 just explained it. Have a good day!
@@justingibson7807 Loli and Lolicon is not Animated CP. The law directly states so long as the animation isn't depicting anything resembling a REAL LIFE CHILD, it's not classified as CP.
Just because you personally believe it is, doesn't mean your personal belief is fact.
If anything your a hypocrite because the guy your defending actually did draw legally classified Animated CP.
This is embarrassing dude
Lol
Lol dude. Revs such a waste of space. Makes no actual content. Complains about whatever can get him views. Meatcanyon makes content, dosent have a online show whoes entire thing is complaining about "wokeness" rev doesn't even knows what woke means but uses it to trigger the tiny manlets that watch him. Worst part is he always claims hs being attacked while being SHOVE down my throat on the feed. Even when i activly say sont show his channel.
What's the context?
The context for the video is complex. To summarize it, there is a streamer known as Vaush who has constantly made stances against lolicons, when he accidentally leaked his NSFW folder on-stream, with several of the displayed images having loli characters (with possibly more as there are folders within the one displayed). MeatCanyon hears of this to make a video to basically slander lolicons as "those who like the real life equivalent".
Then Rev notices and makes a video criticizing MeatCanyon for hypocrisy as several of his animations feature underaged characters in "interesting situations" as well as the fact that one of them was a depiction of a real life event involving someone who was a child when that video specific was made.
From all these pedos who had been cancelled, this one is the least one that I expected
genshin fans really cooked with this one 🔥🔥
This is rlly ironic consider the fact that Rev says is into l0lic0n
COPE
lmao u mad weeb
What happend
He made a video calling Loli and loli-cons pedos for liking fictional characters when he made an animation of a real incident involving Tom Brady kissing his son in a very inappropriate way as well as having underage fictional characters like Ben 10 and other kid characters in sexual situations.
The Tom Brady animation in particular is actually legally classified as CP, as it is depicting real people from a real incident, Essentially making him a massive hypocrite.
@@justingibson7807 Jokes are literally used by PDF files to justify talking about their fantasies of children. There is no excuse for making a skit about a real child from a real incident.
So would a sound only recording of an irl child getting the deed done to them not be considered CP by your own standards since it's not shown? @@justingibson7807
Found a weirdo lol you weird
.