Dr. Craig Keener on the Historicity of the Book of Acts

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 7 ก.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 17

  • @morrisjones9537
    @morrisjones9537 11 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    Craig S. Keener is one of the humblest, yet knowledgeable scholars on Brit Hadasha that the 21st century has. His books also have the least amount of Western bias that I have ever encountered.

  • @brooksbutler8547
    @brooksbutler8547 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I learned and found it interesting that Luke's two books are almost the identical in length.

  • @mirandarogers1558
    @mirandarogers1558 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    1 Corinthians 15:1-4
    Moreover, brethren, I declare unto you the gospel which I preached unto you, which also ye have received, and wherein ye stand;
    2 By which also ye are saved, if ye keep in memory what I preached unto you, unless ye have believed in vain.
    3 For I delivered unto you first of all that which I also received, how that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures;
    4 And that he was buried, and that he rose again the third day according to the scriptures:

  • @carmeister_
    @carmeister_ 11 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Cool

  • @JB-fb8mu
    @JB-fb8mu 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I just want to know if book of acts in the bible was written before or after Jesus' death?

    • @donj2222
      @donj2222 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      After

    • @gabepearson6104
      @gabepearson6104 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes after, however the traditions contained in them could be from around the time of his death

    • @davidortega357
      @davidortega357 ปีที่แล้ว

      Jesus Christ endorses whatever you do in word or deed do it in my Name Mark 16 15 18 in my Name or in the name of Jesus Christ is a name that's above all Names obey Acts 2 38

    • @andys3035
      @andys3035 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@davidortega357 Oneness pentecostal?

  • @johneagle5324
    @johneagle5324 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    The church,you,me and the neighborhood cat need less of these guys. They are the modern scribe and pharisee.

  • @Tomkins10
    @Tomkins10 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Strangely, or maybe not, he conveniently failed to mention the many major differences between the two accounts. Least western bias? Please study Galations 2 and Acts chapter 9 onwards.

    • @callums6570
      @callums6570 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Reformed Apologetics Ministries could you give me some sources? and in which volume in his huge commentary?

  • @Tsadi9Mem9Khet9
    @Tsadi9Mem9Khet9 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    The book of Acts is a work of revisionist history and deliberate deception. For one, it mentions the association of Antioch with the term Christian, but does not mention the fact, as is clear from the writings of second century bishop of Antioch, Theophilus, that it has nothing to do with Jesus, whom he doesn't mention at all in his apology, "Apologia Ad Autolycum". Theophilus says that the reason he and his flock are called Christians is because they are anointed with the oil of God.

    • @agentjackstone3543
      @agentjackstone3543 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      LOL

    • @leedza
      @leedza 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@br1rocks He did. The association of followers of Christ with Christianity is very early and recorded by non Christian sources as such.