182 is overall the best do all plane ever built. This looks like a wren ad of old ! No reversible prop ? Many a wren owners banged the firewall with the prop in reverse ! I have flown skydivers for years in all kinds of 180s through 185s. They all do the best of any job ask. For the price, weight and added fuel use, one must ask is this conversion worth it ?Could be, The wren did not make it
hangliders have to stay under the 130 degree nose swivel angle rule and the only other way is a cannard ..boeings 737 is grounded because of this problem of the incidence not activating because of luffing modulations decentering the lift centroid .. burt rutans cat bird is another good example and the italian paggio .. triple tandem wings are ahead of their time most engineers dont under stand harmonic modulations luffing the rear incidence rule and tail slides and flat spins and divergents ..... skeatesybubbuygoddess 2020
So the addition of the canard that is 1/10 the size of the wing allows you to fly at low speed at a low angle of attack? That makes no sense. I can understand that you have reduced trim drag and improved pitch response so that you aren't elevator limited at forward cg. But the canard can't reduce the aoa at a given speed by very much. You can't do slow flight at 0 aoa. It is still the wing that is producing 95% of the lift and it needs aoa to do it. Your cl vs aoa curve has not shifted that much. This flat attitude thing is marketing wank. Most pilots don't have an engineering background so it is easy to baffle them with bullshit.
To clarify the defenition of slow flight.... the addition of power, to fly at a slower airspeed. Power over drag. This has nothing to do with angle of attack, other than what you are used to seeing in conventional aircraft.
@@pauldavid1027 you think drag has nothing to do with aoa? it has everything to do with aoa. There are two drag components, parasite (cd0) and induced (kClsquared). At a certain aoa these are equal. That is the min. power speed. Any speed below this, or aoa above this, and you need to increase power. Everything in aerodynamics has to do with aoa.
![[UNCUT] ลูกหมี-ลิลลี่ เหงียน เปิดใจฟาด ปู มัณฑนา I คนดังนั่งเคลียร์ I 15 ก.ค.67](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/FKQ60Y7bJ6s/mqdefault.jpg)
Nice flying. Wish they had one of these for a 206.
I own a 260se it's a fun and safe bird!!! also gets a lot of attention at the airports 😀 👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻 Awesome machine Todd!!
The Katmai is and awesome aircraft, and is my dream airplane!
Excellent stuff bro
What an awesome airplane.
Is power-off flight affected, is range improved?
Land Rover with wings.
bermudarailway Land Cruiser*...this doesnt look like it burns oil or breaks down every month lol
182 is overall the best do all plane ever built. This looks like a wren ad of old ! No reversible prop ? Many a wren owners banged the firewall with the prop in reverse ! I have flown skydivers for years in all kinds of 180s through 185s. They all do the best of any job ask. For the price, weight and added fuel use, one must ask is this conversion worth it ?Could be, The wren did not make it
hangliders have to stay under the 130 degree nose swivel angle rule and the only other way is a cannard ..boeings 737 is grounded because of this problem of the incidence not activating because of luffing modulations decentering the lift centroid .. burt rutans cat bird is another good example and the italian paggio .. triple tandem wings are ahead of their time most engineers dont under stand harmonic modulations luffing the rear incidence rule and tail slides and flat spins and divergents ..... skeatesybubbuygoddess 2020
What is the cost and where can a person get a demo?
Anyone know of one of these for sale? Interested
The conversion was $300,000+
I know what you're thinking..."Wow, what a bargain."
I know, right?!
Is this an attachment on a 180? Or is this a new airplane?
@@farmerbrown3768 Add on dude, did you watch the plane? It's a modification(s).
Somehow this was made in 2015 and looks and sounds like it was made in 1985
Was this video made in the 80s?
90s
how much this airplanes
yes
It looks a lot like serbian airplane called SILA, but its probably a lot more expensive then SILA.
SILA... Is tha same as an Aeroandina MXP-150 Kimbaya 2... or an AMD Patriot... I think they are all made in Colombia by Aeroandina (MXP Aircraft)
Don’t show this video to drug runners
El Chapo alertt
Nice airplane, keep it on pavement✌
So the addition of the canard that is 1/10 the size of the wing allows you to fly at low speed at a low angle of attack? That makes no sense. I can understand that you have reduced trim drag and improved pitch response so that you aren't elevator limited at forward cg. But the canard can't reduce the aoa at a given speed by very much. You can't do slow flight at 0 aoa. It is still the wing that is producing 95% of the lift and it needs aoa to do it. Your cl vs aoa curve has not shifted that much. This flat attitude thing is marketing wank. Most pilots don't have an engineering background so it is easy to baffle them with bullshit.
RVguy: No marketing wank. Look at the plane flying in a level attitude with 20 degrees of flap. Fact.
Pelican1984 then the unmodified cessna does as well. The canard can't change that. All it does is improve pitch authority
So go bring a regular 182 in at 50 knotts and let us know how wrong are eyes are
To clarify the defenition of slow flight.... the addition of power, to fly at a slower airspeed. Power over drag. This has nothing to do with angle of attack, other than what you are used to seeing in conventional aircraft.
@@pauldavid1027 you think drag has nothing to do with aoa? it has everything to do with aoa. There are two drag components, parasite (cd0) and induced (kClsquared). At a certain aoa these are equal. That is the min. power speed. Any speed below this, or aoa above this, and you need to increase power. Everything in aerodynamics has to do with aoa.