Christenson Lane Splitter Review

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 24 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 6

  • @christopherberkoben3800
    @christopherberkoben3800 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    It's such a sick board. I am 5' 9" and 175, and I went for the 5' 8", and I am super stoked about it. Surfed knee-to-waste high beachies to chest-high slabbing reefs and haven't skipped a beat. You do have to figure out how to engage the rail to get the most out of it. Thanks for the review!

  • @edawg654
    @edawg654 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I just got this board. I’m a 93KG, 6’3” dude with a 5’10” @34.5Lish - It flys, and my first good top turn on it was insane. I have previously rode the 5’11 RNF96 at 36Lish and that was a boat, flew down the line but either my surfing wasn’t good enough to make tight turns or its bulk just projected me a lot. Much prefer this Christenson and have the fish to compliment it on the small days. Great boards, amazing shaper.
    Regarding your point that you have seen this at up to and around 7 foot - I had thought they were actually Wolverines, as the Wolverines seem to be the mid length version of the LS, with the same rocker etc.

  • @DelMaripper
    @DelMaripper ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great review & really enjoy your videos. Ive been eyeing this board... Im 5'11 165 intermediate based in San Diego.... looking to oversize this one a bit as a step up for when its bigger. Looking at the 5'10 or 6' model. Thoughts?

    • @Sweetheart_of_the_rodeo
      @Sweetheart_of_the_rodeo 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I ride a 6’4 up north and it goes insane. It’s not a groveler, but it can also grovel. Paddles really easy, very predictable when riding. I love it.

  • @luisulloa9572
    @luisulloa9572 ปีที่แล้ว

    What is your dims for this 6’4 you’re reviewing? Cheers

  • @bonsummers2657
    @bonsummers2657 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    slo mo sux