I greatly prefer natural new suit forcing. The only advantage NMF has is that a rebid of 2 Hearts is not forcing and the partnership can play in hearts without getting too high.
"Checkback" (always bidding Clubs rather than the "New" minor) is used in the same situation... Is there any advantage/disadvantage compared to "New minor forcing" Interesting fact: Nmf (or "checkback") achieve what Stayman and transfers achieve those playing Weak NT hands (12-14 HCP).
Adam. On the hand where the bidding is: 1C. 1H, 1NT. - 2H, at the 7:20 mark, the responder is showing 14 cards. S T83, H AQ875, D 95, C Q542. This needs to be corrected.
![[ไฮไลต์] แบดมินตันชาย วิว กุลวุฒิ(ไทย) vs Kenta Nishimoto(ญี่ปุ่น) รอบ 16 คน | โอลิมปิก 2024](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/kaQRLljJkSI/mqdefault.jpg)
I have been trying to get the responses to this convention clear in my mind, and your video really helped! Like your teaching style. Thanks!
great lesson! I am a stranger, and you explain not too fast, I can follow you. Thank you very much
Very good analysis!!! Thanks!!!😊
Thanks … really enjoy your lesson
Nice clear lesson. Just need to remember the sequence with my partner.
I greatly prefer natural new suit forcing. The only advantage NMF has is that a rebid of 2 Hearts is not forcing and the partnership can play in hearts without getting too high.
"Checkback" (always bidding Clubs rather than the "New" minor) is used in the same situation... Is there any advantage/disadvantage compared to "New minor forcing"
Interesting fact: Nmf (or "checkback") achieve what Stayman and transfers achieve those playing Weak NT hands (12-14 HCP).
Adam. On the hand where the bidding is:
1C. 1H, 1NT. - 2H, at the 7:20 mark, the responder is showing 14 cards.
S T83, H AQ875, D 95, C Q542.
This needs to be corrected.