Incredible Machining: Parts Made In Seconds Using 8 Spindles

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 5 มิ.ย. 2023
  • Making precision parts in 7 seconds on Torno’s MultiSWISS 8x26 CNC machine. Every second matters when running high quantity parts and Donnie shows you how to shave off those milliseconds on the programming side of CNC Machining.
    Tornos - bit.ly/3MDcqLh
    Join this channel to get access to perks:
    / @titansofcnc
    Join our community Discord! / discord
    Help us fund FREE Education by purchasing tools seen in our videos here:
    TITANSofCNCTooling.com
    Create your free CNCEXPERT profile here:
    rebrand.ly/TiCNCEx
    FREE CNC Machining Academy:
    rebrand.ly/TiAcademy
    FREE Aerospace Academy:
    rebrand.ly/TiAero
    FREE Grinding Academy:
    rebrand.ly/TiGRIND
    Subscribe for daily content and expert knowledge: rebrand.ly/SUBTITANS
    ___
    ___
    Follow us on Instagram:
    rebrand.ly/TiINSTA
    Like us on Facebook:
    rebrand.ly/TiFACEBOOK
    Join the conversation on our Facebook Group:
    rebrand.ly/TiFBGroup
    Connect with us on LinkedIn:
    rebrand.ly/TiLINKEDIN
    ___
    ___
    THANK YOU to our Partners who make this content possible:
    Kennametal - rebrand.ly/TiKennametal
    Heller: us.heller.biz/titansofcnc/
    DN Solutions - www.titansfordn.com/machines
    United Grinding - hubs.ly/Q013zHpC0
    Mastercam - rebrand.ly/MastercamEDUTiYT
    Tornos - bit.ly/3MDcqLh
    Blaser Swisslube - rebrand.ly/TiBlaser
    Solidworks - rebrand.ly/TiSLDWRKS20
    Trumpf - rebrand.ly/TiTRUMPF2022
    Markforged - bit.ly/Titans_Markforged
    Tyrolit - rebrand.ly/TiTYROLIT
    Mitutoyo - rebrand.ly/TiMitutoyo
    Haimer - rebrand.ly/TiHAIMER
    Schunk - rebrand.ly/TiSchunk
    Kaeser Compressors - us.kaeser.com/titan
    #Machining #Machinist #Engineering
  • วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี

ความคิดเห็น • 418

  • @liamnelson49
    @liamnelson49 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +559

    I work in a small shop and all the parts I make are for in house assembly. so I can have periods where I have no work so I'd fill my time by speeding up my run times which just lead to longer periods with no work.

    • @Houcnc
      @Houcnc 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      😂

    • @willemhaifetz-chen1588
      @willemhaifetz-chen1588 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Sell that time obviously

    • @mikeorr9533
      @mikeorr9533 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      The software does not work out fastest time...!!? Okay then.

    • @willemhaifetz-chen1588
      @willemhaifetz-chen1588 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +30

      @@mikeorr9533 Factory settings are more safe to prevent maintenance, tool and material use...

    • @sudacaenny
      @sudacaenny 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      😂😂😂

  • @neiltonks
    @neiltonks 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +183

    I had a supervisor that used to do this, try and squeeze every tiny bit of time from the programme. Taking the tools to the absolute limit of their capabilities, which in theory is great, but unless your going to monitor the machine constantly, in case of tool failure, sometimes it's got to be better to loose a little time per part knowing that every part will be fine, than gaining some time but loosing it on tool breakage and sort outs

    • @MakeItWithCalvin
      @MakeItWithCalvin 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +23

      This. Milling brass/aluminum is way more forgiving than stainless and titanium. I worked for a very short time for a shop that did Swiss work and took the max-setting suggestions as suggestions for high nickel stainless/titanium. In short, they burned tools left n right and I genuinely wondered if they really saved money with the scrapped parts.

    • @neiltonks
      @neiltonks 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @@MakeItWithCalvin brass is forgiving, depending on what type of is, aluminium is ok but can get 'sticky' on the tools if the cooling isn't ideal and the tool is being pushed to hard.

    • @mjodr
      @mjodr 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      I was thinking the same thing. You can speed it up just to the point of having a failure every 1,000 parts and not notice it. Then you lost all that time fixing it and getting it running again. I deal with the same thing on my 3D printer trying to reduce every second of print time. I tweak it so far it fails in the middle of a 8 hour print. Then I have to start all over again. So how much time did I save? lol

    • @MakeItWithCalvin
      @MakeItWithCalvin 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      @@mjodr Boom! You nailed it on the 3D printing side of things. People want speed, but then cry when the print reliability is crap. That's the price you pay pushing things.

    • @travistucker7317
      @travistucker7317 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@mjodr have you tried 150% infill line width at near your max volume flow?

  • @Silvergum
    @Silvergum 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +212

    mad respect to you guys for being dedicated to delivering free education and insight into machining at a high level

    • @sud9320
      @sud9320 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I assume that making these video's is super expensive. What do you thing their motivations are? Are the channel and their sponsors just making these video's to get young people interested in CNC machining and other related careers? (It's working 🤣)

    • @taxicamel
      @taxicamel 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@sud9320 I don't know about the "expensive" side. What is "super expensive"? The motivations is very likely to make more money from a different source ....TH-cam. "Benefit to others" would only be up to the audience.
      HOWEVER, standing in front of a machine not running, is "non-productive".....losing money ....lost machine time.
      .

    • @traviscrawford2664
      @traviscrawford2664 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Tittyboy/owner is the only one doing okay(he is nearly free). The rest of these Jabronies, are lames. Only the owner is winning what so ever. Everyone else in these vids are broke assses

    • @cartoondog5
      @cartoondog5 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Eh... too many assumptions, they might be waiting for a material shipment.@@taxicamel

  • @franklinblazek25
    @franklinblazek25 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +67

    I always tell the people I train you can make bad parts just as fast as good ones lol

    • @POWER-LINKS
      @POWER-LINKS 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It's either a usable PART, or it's junk. No such thing as a BAD part. It's how I was taught. (.005 tolerance to us actually meant .002-3 max)

  • @M4kron20
    @M4kron20 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    That was definitely worth the wait to see it make parts. That machine is insane with 7 seconds cycles. it just blow my mind. 🤯

  • @jurysummons2194
    @jurysummons2194 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    In 1965, fresh out of High School, I got a job as an apprentice tool designer for a screw machine shop. The shop had about 30 multiple spindle screw machines, and a half dozen single spindle machines. I think the biggest were Acme-Gridley RA-8. 8 spindle behemoths, clouds of cutting oil and tons of chips. I only worked there about a year, then I worked for President Johnson, he was Commander in Chief, I was a Private.

  • @kylestewart5500
    @kylestewart5500 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +22

    It was amazing seeing this run in person while I was there and for Donnie giving us a personal explanation of it. Thank you Titan for allowing us to have a tour of your shop and too Trevor for giving us the amazing tour. Also thank you to the rest of the Titans for showing us everything you guys are doing and saying hi to us. Thanks Kyle

    • @donniehinske
      @donniehinske 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Thank YOU kyle! Also thanks for stopping by! 🤙

  • @EvilGeniusGaming84
    @EvilGeniusGaming84 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Golly man, that machine is very advanced! I remember working at a shop and we were machining the exhaust elbows for Holset, they went on the dodge Cummins turbo diesels. We were required to get 20 parts an hour done, and I was always in competition with 2nd shift on who could get the most parts done per shift so I messed with the feeds and speeds on the machine and figured out I was able to get 30 parts an hour done without wearing down the inserts more. No wonder why my boss loved me, come to find out, I saved a lot of time for the cycle time of the parts 🤙🏽😉

  • @kumkan3588
    @kumkan3588 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I'm from South Africa and just love these videos

  • @stevehayward1854
    @stevehayward1854 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +45

    I used to set multi spindles many years ago, but instead of CNC they where cam operated and utilised form tools, our multi spindle bay were manufacturing millions of parts per week. Single spindle auto's were making olives 3 at a time with 6 second cycle

    • @TyBaumMTB
      @TyBaumMTB 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Cam driven multispindles are very fast and still hold amazing tolerance. I used to design all the form tools, tool holding and setups for some. These CNC ones have a huge advantage though, fast setup/changeovers

    • @LordViktor299
      @LordViktor299 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      I currently work on that. Acme-gridly 6 spindle. I'm cranking out a dual delivery part. Cycle time of 6.7 seconds (divide in half cause of the dual delivery.) While this vid is awesome, you're right. I'm holding a 2 tenths of a tho tolerance. crapping out 900k in a few months.

    • @ringsofbravo
      @ringsofbravo 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I'm a davenport guy. We can get down to 2 seconds or so. But man they take a long time to set up

    • @MyAudioPipe
      @MyAudioPipe 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      In norway we have much faster speed pr part than this. 3 sec at some point depending at what wee was making. the gippring part have a cycle time of 1.3 sec that's cam machines. the index ms 40 cnc could make this par in this video at 5 sec may be faster. run it as a dual 4 spindel machine . if its not a special cut that i cant se.

    • @R2_D3
      @R2_D3 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Index 25's and Traub A25's, and other models of course, were/are king of high speed production!! Only ''problem'' is/was, calculating the curves on the cam plates and making the plates for a new part, and fine-tuning the cycle. But if it was done correct, it was blistering fast!! The good old days!!

  • @corncrasy
    @corncrasy 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Always enjoy your videos Donny keep up the great work!

  • @McChaffer
    @McChaffer 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    really cool to see the in-depth optimization

  • @cheatinggravity173
    @cheatinggravity173 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    Old school manual machinist here. Really neat to watch these incredibly amazing machines and the guys who are pros at running them.
    I do find it surprising that you don't get unacceptable dings in your finished parts, especially on the threads of heavy brass fittings, dropping into the bins the way they do.

    • @seanb9818
      @seanb9818 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It has a part catcher. You see it come in and clamp the part just as it's parting off then retracts. He also tries to change the time it takes for the part catcher to move from 0.4 seconds to 0.1 but it doesn't allow him as the minimum it can go is 0.2 seconds.
      I'm guessing once the catcher retracts it drops the part maybe 4" into the baskets which (again guessing) are on a conveyor. So they can be emptied when the machine is still running. So there's no time lost stopping to empty 1 full basket of parts every 5 minutes.

    • @cheatinggravity173
      @cheatinggravity173 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@seanb9818 ahhh, I gotcha, hadn't seen that. Makes sense now.

  • @Fizzie_K
    @Fizzie_K 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Been running a couple 8x26's for a few years now and about to get a third and they are wonderful machines. Get them setup correctly and they will just pump out parts. We've had it run a single part for weeks at a time with online minor offset changes.

  • @st3althyone
    @st3althyone 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    It's crazy how intuitive that Tornos software is. Great job showing us what is possible with these amazing machines.

    • @stefan-bayer
      @stefan-bayer 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      With an IT background the software looks outdated and could be even more intuitive from my impression. Not sure if this is the best of the best.

    • @st3althyone
      @st3althyone 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@stefan-bayer I never said it was “the best of the best,” only that it is intuitive.

    • @stefan-bayer
      @stefan-bayer 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@st3althyone Sorry, was not meant to sound mean from my side :) - just wanted to check if someone had the same impression that this could be improved more

    • @mjodr
      @mjodr 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      It looks the opposite of intuitive to me. Like Sefan said, it could have a way better UI. Especially having to close the editor windows to open up the variable definitions, just to have to go back again to edit. Like...make a pop-up of the definition when you hover over it? What year is this? lol...but I know why. They want ultimate reliability.

    • @st3althyone
      @st3althyone 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@stefan-bayer I have no doubt that it could be improved, just like any other software.

  • @BTR_m
    @BTR_m 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Thank you 👍, as always Donnie's video = fun and super informative about swiss machining

  • @robertwest3093
    @robertwest3093 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I'm impressed with what these machines are capable of doing. I'm even more impressed at the brains of the company that designed and manufactured this machine!

  • @chuckbeaver6473
    @chuckbeaver6473 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    nice work. hopefully the tools will stay fine as long as they do before ;) how long does it take to setup this part manufacturing on the 8 spindle? (Programming and Tool setup) TY and chip on!

  • @shaniegust1225
    @shaniegust1225 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Sheesh! Great video Donnie! This is super impressive.

  • @PraetexDesign
    @PraetexDesign 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

    Honestly this was a cool video. Not sure I'll ever be in the market for a multi-spindle Swiss-type machine, so it's nice to see a break down of some of the features as an onlooker.

    • @wannabecarguy
      @wannabecarguy 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Jobs like these go overseas.

    • @PraetexDesign
      @PraetexDesign 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@wannabecarguy Not always.

  • @suvajit_Dutta
    @suvajit_Dutta 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +33

    Very impressive this machining so powerful it can only handle by barry

    • @donniehinske
      @donniehinske 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      You spelled Donnie wrong

    • @suvajit_Dutta
      @suvajit_Dutta 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Just watch it and reply

    • @suvajit_Dutta
      @suvajit_Dutta 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @Donnie Hinske I just remembered the reaction in this video 🤣😂th-cam.com/video/dr23brKzzlg/w-d-xo.html

    • @randywl8925
      @randywl8925 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      ​​@@donniehinske 😂😂😂
      I was surprised he called you Barry because you're the only guy on Titan that's one Donnie wide. 😁
      Edit:
      And one Donnie tall.

  • @LumenPsycho
    @LumenPsycho 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Impressive speechcraft, probably backed up by your knowledge as well.
    To many companies do things half heartedly.
    Efficiency & safety should always be the top keywords for any workphase.

  • @Kardos55
    @Kardos55 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Got to love those variables.

  • @seancollins9745
    @seancollins9745 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    excellent, I'm always fighting to keep machine time down good stuff

  • @TheReecebob
    @TheReecebob 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Loved the video! One question, how does the machine get the material? keep up the amazing videos!

  • @MJ-iy4fb
    @MJ-iy4fb 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This stuff blows my mind, I wish I would have gotten into machining years ago. Super cool stuff!!

  • @emojidinosaur7300
    @emojidinosaur7300 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    If i had that at my old shop I would have increased the cycle time by 4 seconds. When the boss made a dollar, i made a dime.

  • @holdernewtshesrearin5471
    @holdernewtshesrearin5471 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    My question is who wrote the original program and why was so much inefficiency written in to begin?
    Was it originally intended for a steel part?
    And why isn't there a master program or key parameter to set the program for the material used that would automatically optimize feed rates, spindle speeds and machine operations for the material chosen?

  • @vadkani7279
    @vadkani7279 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    My collegues dont give a shit about cycle time, they like to hang on their phone and walk around

  • @martinkscott
    @martinkscott 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Superb machining sir

  • @Michael-nu1py
    @Michael-nu1py 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    After years of watching this channel I have come to find out titan has only hired geniuses

  • @pwest3732
    @pwest3732 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Unbelievable. Machining is amazing.

  • @ramongeorge8897
    @ramongeorge8897 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Love this guy 1000 words a mins

  • @joachimbui4841
    @joachimbui4841 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    If you reduce the timer. Then I guess that the pressure between the part and the tool will be higher. Then how do you select the appropriate operation time to avoid damaging your tool?

  • @spdcrzy
    @spdcrzy 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Saving 2 days for a half mil unit job just from cutting off 300ms is NUTS.

  • @codorin
    @codorin 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    We at my place whe use alfing ad400 on line 2 . We do the 6.6 duramax connecting rods. 4 parts per cycle. 53 sec a cycle. Super fast. Seeing this machine is amazing.

  • @dustinsteiniger3762
    @dustinsteiniger3762 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Question...
    Are those variables stored with the program, or with the machine?
    Once Donnie changes the dwell time on the parts catcher, does that mean this can never be sped up further on any other part? Or is it only changed within this program?

    • @silent_tofu7921
      @silent_tofu7921 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      It's stored in the machine, but you can always set up a program to reinitialize your variables for a particular part.

  • @smoking_monk3257
    @smoking_monk3257 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I used to make those parts on old oil cooled cam driven 6 spindle. Those things light up like an oil well until you kill the air. You have never seen so many calm people while something the size of a moving van is a raging inferno inside the building. Lol

  • @cavsh00ter
    @cavsh00ter 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Gives me inspiration

  • @SDMFDave06
    @SDMFDave06 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Cool excited to show you how to be a badass you're killing me here dude what's Titans video I've seen

  • @Jeremy-80
    @Jeremy-80 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It would be nice to be able to expand my education because every shop here dont have machines or parts to actually learn anything new. It would be nice to expand my horizon.! Love the videos

  • @FrozenThai
    @FrozenThai 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    This is sick. When i'm in the store and see parts like these where It's obvious they have been machined, I have always wondered how they were made efficiently.

  • @jeremymatthies726
    @jeremymatthies726 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    Donnie, nice job explaining the software, my question to you is how long does it take to write the program for an operation like that?

    • @drafty0183
      @drafty0183 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Not to mention to set the tooling. Mind you, they have a pretty efficient way of setting offsets (touch setters etc) quite quickly on each tool.

    • @mjodr
      @mjodr 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It would take me more than a week to get the initial program set up, so throw that whole week of time gained away, lol.

    • @Azure1Zero4
      @Azure1Zero4 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      When you do large and long part run with a machine like he's using. Long setup time and programming is really a small percentage of the total time you save. He's doing what would takes a single feed swiss lathe a min in 7 seconds.

  • @TheBeachbum9102
    @TheBeachbum9102 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Ok heavily thinking about a Swiss machine now!

  • @gc6549
    @gc6549 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Well done !

  • @ironictragedy
    @ironictragedy 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Can the software be run on a desktop in a more ergonomic position, but also so it can be developed while the machine is doing another job?
    Even better if there was simulator so you can watch what the machine would actually be doing before any material has to be run.

  • @cavsh00ter
    @cavsh00ter 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    This guy has the brain of a computer its awesome to see him think and show how milli seconds means serious time

  • @OscarMendez-ff5cz
    @OscarMendez-ff5cz 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This is awesome

  • @DJHeyl
    @DJHeyl 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    i loved to work on index ms32p, its littel bit diffrent then the Torno’s MultiSWISS.

  • @master8laster49
    @master8laster49 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I'm thinking formtool, get the EDM guys to make a carbide tool for all the OD work. The machine is awesome!!!!

  • @kw2519
    @kw2519 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Nice, that’s how you use that thing!

  • @662OutdoorAdventures
    @662OutdoorAdventures 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I always enjoyed TB Deco. I have seen lots of people struggle with it.

    • @j-dog2231
      @j-dog2231 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      i like TB deco its pretty easy to understand

  • @garbo8962
    @garbo8962 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Years ago I did some electrical work in a shop that had maybe 12 screw machines. I noticed they had some stubby left hand drill bits so I had to ask where they use them. To!d me right after an operation that was turning CCW. with the older machines thought they to!d me they save a full second from not having to stop machine then reverse rotation.

  • @MikeBaxterABC
    @MikeBaxterABC 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I used to set up and run a Brown & Sharpe Automatic 2G Screw Machine .. Most of the parts I made were HIgh Speed Steel, punches. My goal was 300 parts a day average (including set ups) :)

  • @agp9844
    @agp9844 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What about tooling wear at the accelerated pace

  • @bencordell1965
    @bencordell1965 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This guy should ask for a raise

  • @donlong1234
    @donlong1234 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Wow those are like davenport times😮

  • @jordanolsonm
    @jordanolsonm 11 วันที่ผ่านมา

    You should show / explain the process of keeping a machine like this filled with material. Do you have down time every 20 minutes or whatever to load 8 more sticks of brass in?

  • @ArcheryMultiverse
    @ArcheryMultiverse 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Crazy damn engineering

  • @jkpaschal
    @jkpaschal 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This MF HEELY'd over during the transition! LMAO that is fantastic.

  • @user-di6ve8ds8w
    @user-di6ve8ds8w 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Your machining is my vision
    I want to raise my factory and utube channel~!

  • @whiskeythetwisty5564
    @whiskeythetwisty5564 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    2:22 Is he wearing heelies?😂😂

    • @trumanhw
      @trumanhw 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      exactly. I searched for others to find your comment via CMD+F of a 2 and a colon.
      wtf? you're the only other person aside from me who's weirded out by this? lol.

  • @Spikeydelic
    @Spikeydelic 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Donny is so epic. :D cool machine too..

  • @benotyourboss
    @benotyourboss 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Sry for asking what is a “Swiss Supervisor” or a “Swiss Machine”? I mean I know that Swiss means from Switzerland, but I never heard it in relation to these terms… thx for explaining!

  • @zacharycaron4834
    @zacharycaron4834 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Did he slide up to the camera on heelies? 🤣. My dawg!

  • @mrd.808
    @mrd.808 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Curious what Titans of CNC Machining thinks of Shars Tool Company???? Nice videos as always. 🤙🏽

  • @iamnoone.
    @iamnoone. 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    Speeding up the program is all well and good, but how much undo ware are you putting on the machine. You may save a day, but how much time in downtime for machine failure. Plus, the tools have a max work speed. How many of them are over working. When they program these machines, they are all ready working at optimal speed

    • @BPond7
      @BPond7 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      Seeing as he’s cutting brass, I’d say it’s a non-issue.

    • @MarioAPN
      @MarioAPN 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Well, when you are writting your code for that machine...

    • @supremecommander2398
      @supremecommander2398 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@BPond7 in this case it may not... but its something he didn't cover in the video. those changes may have an impact on tool-life, and as such you eventually have to consider tool-change times too.
      in my past job i had to redesign an injection mold from pure mechanical sub-division demoulding to a hydraulic driven one, because they couldn't just write a better control-code for the machine to not accelerate/decelerate to fast for the couplings and whatnot.
      Being able to save cycletime just on the machine is a great feature...

    • @scottwatrous
      @scottwatrous 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      The defaults can sometimes be fairly conservative so that it can cover all bases as the person setting it doesn't know what will be going on in each specific case. It's up to a smart programmer to know when bringing times down won't cause problems, and bump things back up when they do.
      It could be that the ideal solution for something like this is to reduce certain dwells on specific ops where that will affect the end result but keep dwells longer on stations that can afford it without affecting total time, if doing so would improve reliability or so-on.
      Because saving 1 second might save a week but if it causes a 5 day downtime for maintenance (plus expenses) was it worth it? That said if running a cylinder harder means needing to be swapped out in 5 years instead of 7, but also means you get 7 years of parts done in 5, then it's worth it.

    • @BigDogEnergy-69420
      @BigDogEnergy-69420 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You can't even spell 'wear' correctly, how can you can even be trusted to predict and handle the wear characteristics of anything when your first solution is "just give up" before you've taken a single measurement or changed a single variable? Quitters like you are hilarious

  • @steveb9270
    @steveb9270 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    As a old school machinist i always tell my apprentices slow and steady wins the race ! My car does 250 kph but i would like to arrive a bit later than dead on time,

  • @flightmaster999
    @flightmaster999 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    So this is basically MS Project for CNC machines, interesting!

  • @465maltbie
    @465maltbie 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Is this machine running bar stock or ground stock? Charles

    • @donniehinske
      @donniehinske 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Just regular stock

    • @465maltbie
      @465maltbie 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@donniehinske Thanks, have a great week.

  • @bmxscape
    @bmxscape 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    wont the tools dull quicker in theory too? for a machine like this would you change out every tooling at once or do some last longer than others

    • @berniepragle948
      @berniepragle948 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Tool wear isn't too big of a problem on brass parts, esp with carbide tooling. Some tools in the setup last longer than others. Generally related to stock removal.

    • @codorin
      @codorin 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Each tool has its own tool life count. Tool life can vary widely. Example ee have taps that are done at 300 and reamers that go 3000.
      Material, feed rate, the tool material, the coolant, spindle speed, all have an effect on tool life.

  • @joecordero1699
    @joecordero1699 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    What’s the cam software that is used for this machine?

    • @El_Indio_Juan_Diego_
      @El_Indio_Juan_Diego_ 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Tb deco you program by hand on the machine or your computer but the macros make it a breeze to jump into it

  • @jmannUSMC
    @jmannUSMC 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Don't get me wrong I love these vids, I just wish the intensity went down like 2 notches.

  • @JaggedJack1
    @JaggedJack1 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    How might this fail if you pushed these timings to fast (and the software did not catch it and stop you)? Would it simply result in wasted parts that were not made to spec, or could it damage the (presumably exceedingly expensive) CNC machine you are running? In other words, what are the stakes here?

    • @travistucker7317
      @travistucker7317 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      In this instance, i think running a spindle into the parts catcher is the most likely issue. That would be bad, could be very bad. A spindle for that machine might be 50k and take a week to replace, maybe more. Probably need a tool catcher, too.
      The spindle hitting things, or things hitting the spindle can happen with all machines, and is always bad, and often expensive.

  • @anujgiri8771
    @anujgiri8771 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    hello sir, Could you please guide me how i can join your team. i am a mechanical Enginner and also know Autocad And Solidworks.

  • @AquaMarine1000
    @AquaMarine1000 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    "Boom!" is catching.

  • @HighGear7445
    @HighGear7445 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Used to mentor newby's and these were with newbys setting the tools and writing the program. I would have them set tool change speed to 1/4 of norm until they were comfortable with there settings and proved out there program.
    We only did short run parts and the average order was generally just several hours long.
    The manager didn't like me telling them that so 100% tool changes it was and there were some spectacular crashes.
    Crashing at 1/4 speed caused for less carnage but it wasn't my call heh heh.

  • @toolmakerdave5287
    @toolmakerdave5287 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    super interesting👍👍

  • @95lovi
    @95lovi 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Of course use metrics its more transparent and quicker to grasp and acknowledge as an machine human interface. But what your explainig is the process optimization which I think will be a process that will be taken over by AI in the very near future. What are the most effective operation process with the capabiltys given by the machine

  • @y2ksw1
    @y2ksw1 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    How much are you willing to invest for an automated optimization procedure?

  • @DG-mk7kd
    @DG-mk7kd 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This is the kind of optimization that artificial intelligence systems could excel
    especially with integration into an overall production line

  • @andypandy9931
    @andypandy9931 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    used to do this 50 years ago with cam auto's

  • @adammiller4879
    @adammiller4879 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    So is this considered a conversational machine then Donnie ? Looks a lot like it, never seen a machine where all the tool paths are running off off variables. This is a headache 😂but looks to make editing programs on the fly way faster.

    • @donniehinske
      @donniehinske 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      No it’s not conversational. It outputs a template for you to add the cutting toolpaths. That’s all you typically have to add tho. It’s one of the easiest ways to do a 8 spindle in my opinion because all the staging is done for you. All of the cutoff operations were in there before I started. I only added like 10% of what you are seeing on the screen

  • @kdenyer1
    @kdenyer1 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Now we are machining 🥳

  • @IanMott
    @IanMott 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Would you like software that is easier to use?

  • @Daniel-om4sc
    @Daniel-om4sc 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    10:43 Donnie Donald is Living on the edge

  • @shaynemackey3614
    @shaynemackey3614 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great animator!

  • @derekb4731
    @derekb4731 10 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Brilliant, hope the customer knows how long it takes to make lol

  • @ilyamanyakin8241
    @ilyamanyakin8241 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    Looks like a good application for optimization algorithms/"AI" - although it seems surprising that the CAD software doesn't include that already - perhaps it's trading off speed for tool durability or probability of failure?

    • @stefan-bayer
      @stefan-bayer 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Yes totally agree. Was wondering about the same in my comment, coming from an IT background. Also the whole UI looks somewhat dated, can someone comment, is this state of the art?

    • @srck4035
      @srck4035 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      @@stefan-bayer it's normal for cnc machines to run somewhat old looking software. Stuff needs to be 100 percent bug free or crashes will happen and they are costly and dangerous. We have machines from 2018 with ui that looks like windows 98

    • @stefan-bayer
      @stefan-bayer 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@srck4035 I understand the point you are coming from.
      I will argue the lack of startup made it this way because the R&D needed to start in the machining industry is very high so until now no real innovative startup has competed. But a well design UI is not prone to have more errors. The better UI just improves the operators error so this would go hand in hand normally if the industry leaders would not be that “ancient”.
      But that’s just my impression

    • @srck4035
      @srck4035 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@stefan-bayer just saying it takes ages to test the ui. Imagine one bit flip from. 0.1mm to 10mm. Crash.

    • @nickbell3546
      @nickbell3546 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Good input, although this would not be possible with EAR and ITAR parts as the part dimensions are national security. You would need a localized AI server that is ITAR controlled/not connected to the internet.

  • @austindudla
    @austindudla 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    NINE channel? holy moly

  • @jackmclane1826
    @jackmclane1826 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What is extremely weird: The fastest machines are still analog. Driven by cam disks and gears! o.o
    I also didn't believe that at first, but these beasts are still made in a high tech plant in northern Italy (I've been there) and they run a lot of parts for the automotive industry. Sometimes with sub second cycle times.
    Of course, they have other insane drawbacks like changeover times and modularity.

  • @kdenyer1
    @kdenyer1 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Definitely a faster setup than old schools wickman 6 spindle 😂

  • @richardcooke9948
    @richardcooke9948 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Back in the 70s I ran a multi spindle chucker. No CNC or computer. Young people don’t realize that things were made without computers and made quite fast.

  • @lyjansen5138
    @lyjansen5138 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Why is it running with TB deco and not with tisis?

    • @j-dog2231
      @j-dog2231 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      its just what the multi-spindles run on

  • @stewartstewartstewart
    @stewartstewartstewart 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Keep your arms still man!

  • @ababab9831
    @ababab9831 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    So how many test passes are needed to ensure a good finish with a given s&f per operation? Seems like that’s a complication not addressed 🤔

    • @Dan-gs3kg
      @Dan-gs3kg 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      A lot of N-of-M checks, batching, binning, histograms, and extrapolation.

  • @leensteed7861
    @leensteed7861 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    Id be happy with the income from recycling the chips coming off

  • @ricbarker4829
    @ricbarker4829 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The machine may finish a part every 7 seconds, but it takes 56 seconds to make a part.

  • @victorpedersen7479
    @victorpedersen7479 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    yooo i like this Donald Danger Dude!

  • @mobilePCreviews
    @mobilePCreviews 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    you heard it first here folks, 0.7 seconds is a lot.