Quick correction: It is NOT your right to pick which cop you want to deal with. When a suspect who has been acting crazy and uncooperative demands to deal with another officer, it's just another way they try to take control of the situation.
You cannot ask for a "different cop" - you can ask for a supervisor (which is a different cop 99% of the time), but there is a distinction. It's the speaking to police equivalent of "I'd like to speak to the manager." This is in place to protect police departments from rookies or mentally deficient officers from racking up lawsuits for the department. Failure to call in a supervisor when asked for is basically 100% dismissal of charges unless it was a violent crime or something caught on bodycam. The reason most people would want to call in a supervisor (and why it's a good idea for anything aside from a standard ticket), is because you remove the arresting/detaining officer from the position of ultimate authority. Many cops do the job because of the authority power trip they get, so when you take that away from them, they're just another dude standing in the back and letting someone else talk.
I mean, I think her asking for a female officer is reasonable. Especially if one is already present. But it's definitely a situational thing rather than a universal thing.
You can request anything but it can also be denied. "There is no legal requirement for police to accommodate your request, but as a matter of policy, they will make an effort to do so."
@@zebrion5793 They can ask for a supervisor but it is they are not required. That’s a misconception people have, that cops have to bring their supervisor upon request and the cop has to stop what they’re doing until they arrive. The person could have their window smash, dragged out the car, put in handcuffs, and in the back of a cop car by the time the supervisor arrives and that’s all legal.
Yeah, you're "detained" when the police pull you over, and you can't leave until they are done with you, but it doesn't mean you're going to arrest you. Now, if your car gets pulled over and your passenger jumps out and runs for the woods, you're going to have a bad time.
Military police are also particularly sticklers, they have to be because of rowdy servicemen can get on a base-- they're like a step away from teachers pets, except they are also the teachers giving the punishment. But like any facet of the military they have their own culture and demeanor
That Military Police brother was trying real hard to not get himself in trouble and to explain her that she needed to cooperate. He was aware he has no jurisdiction.
Okay smol note. While cops are allowed to let suspects use the restroom, it is extremely risky. You do not have visual on the suspect at all. They may attempt to flee, tamper with, or destroy evidence. It is a huge mess, typically only saved for low risk suspects or bystanders/witnesses.
Plus, pretty much every difficult suspect I've seen (selection bias, of course, but still) immediately feels the urgent need to pee as soon as they're in cuffs/a squad, so it's not exactly an unknown dodge.
I recently saw an arrest where a lady tried stalling where when she finally took the breath test she was under the legal limit, HOWEVER unless you blow the amount you would without drinking, they do the math for the time it took for you to decrease those levels and then reverse it, so since the math proved she would have been over the legal limit when they arrived, they still arrested her for DUI
the female officer had true "Mom" energy. that death stare before grabbing her was enough to make my blood run a bit cold lmao. she was fucking DONE with her shit.
I'm trying to do police work if someone says I pay taxes, so I pay your salary, I would say this.Yes, you do, and I pay taxes too. So technically, I pay my own salary and you also pay me to arrest you.
If the cops stop you, the law supersedes your feelings. Cooperate, keep quiet. Emotional support animals are not a legally recognized thing so leaning on them as excuse will just land you in more trouble. Service dogs are an entire different thing as they are in fact legally recognized and trained.
Yup. Even if you feel something was done improperly, you can voice your refusal to give consent, but note that you'll still co-operate on the grounds that you can't object in that context. Court is where these questions are tested, and being reasonable and controlled, even (especially) if the officers aren't, will go a long way with a judge.
@@michaelccozens This 500%! Your cooperation is kept to a minimum to not get into more trouble, likw you said voicing your refusal to consent to searches is pretty much the only thing you should say, at that point your best bet is to either record if possible or right afterwards write everything down and take the contact info of any willing witnesses. The only job is surviving the encounter and documenting as much as possible for your case in court. It saves people a ton of extra hassle.
it´s always fascinating see the crazy patience, cops put forth in these situations. mad respect! ... nice, the moment she talked about anxiety, i literally had to burp. What a timing, lol. ... I feel sorry for the brother. ... also they told her, she is free to go AFTER the investigation!
Not to excuse poor cop behaviour, but if I was dealing with that shit weekly for years… I am just saying I understand why some police officers are unhinged.
2:49 little legal info here for ya😊 Detained does not mean arrested. It simply means they are being contained whilst police gather info and attempt to make an arrest. Imagine 2 friends getting pulled over and both step out of the vehicle, then one takes off running for some reason. Now imagine the same situation but both were placed in handcuffs beforehand. It is significantly harder for the one who attempts to run to get away because of the cuffs and if the other who doesnt run stays, then no charges are filed against them. Its a case of "better safe than sorry"
Yep, and if you have problems with being detained, yelling at the police usually won't help you, as if you make enough of a public display of a stink; it could get propped up to public disorder charge if the officers feel overzealous. Then you *would* be arrested, in essence for just talking back sternly Even then, if you have a complaint, there's still a process and you're supposed to submit the complaint AFTER being released, or processed at a station. The worst thing you can do is become volatile WHILE being detained or arrested, because that means they have recorded 'evidence' that your detention was justified, even if the reason for detention or arrest was BS to begin with and shouldn't have happened Shitty as it sounds, as there are equally bad cops as there are good cops, best thing to do is stay emotionally level and make your grievances known aloud, but not in a way that's threatening or combative. Majority of interactions with police are recorded, via chest cam or dashboard, which while intended to help police, also helps you define context when they're pulled for evidence whenever there is a complaint. YOUR rights are important, and they NEED to be cited, but at the appropriate times
@@Whazzupie Correct, when the cops stop you and start an investigation that is not the place to try an litigate you case, that is for the court, filming them is your only line of defense but you must cooperate. People really need to understand that charges are not like Pokemon you do not need to catch them all! Too many times people get into arguments with the police and escalate into the resisting arrest, disorderly conduct combo for no good reason. Raising a public stink mid police stop as if you are a victim of a great injustice only works if the cops are in the wrong, she was no damsel in distress though, she gaslighted and lied and denied which was probably used against her in court. The part of her naming her brother as an attorney early in the video could also result in her brother getting in trouble for impersonating a lawyer if the brother didn't correct her.
@@alexisrivera200xablei agree. Even if the cop is wrong it is always better to just cooperate and take action after the fact. It can save your life and possibly get you money if its a legal case.
There's a big difference between an "Emotional Support Animal" and a "Service Animal". Service animals are trained and get certified. Emotional support animals can really just be any pet that brings comfort to someone with mental health issues. Most of the time theres no actual legal distinction between an ESA and a regular pet, but some states and cities have policies allowing them into places regular pets cant go. The problem is its not something you can disprove, and so there's this stigma in the service industry that many people who claim to have ESA's are just saying that so they can bring the pet to a restaurant or supermarket There was actually a story recently about an emotional support duck getting kicked out of a Buc-ee's. Buc-ee's allowed service dogs, and the duck owner tried to argue that there was such a thing as a "service duck"
Isn't it funny how people like this lady only remember they have dependents when they think they can use them to get-out of consequences? If she cared about the dog, to say nothing of "not endangering it by drunk-driving with the dog in the car", she would have mentioned its care right off the top. Instead, she only brought it up when all her other attempts to delay or deny her arrest had failed. It's all very "kid kills their parents and then requests mercy on the grounds of being an orphan". If you only use your dependents as a shield, you're not their caregiver; you're their exploiter. Less parent, more pimp.
Brother: "there's really nothing i can do, here, and they're pretty much right" Her: "see? he needs to be here, and is explaining exactly why you're wrong."
16:22 so if you think you can wait out the alcohol it would take multiple hours. In most reports the length of time is taken into account when doing blood alcohol tests.
Friendly reminder that an “emotional support animal” (ESA) is not an animal that was trained at all and there is no official status for it. A “service animal” (SA) actually undergoes training to perform a service. It can be one or more services, but they can clearly and directly be articulated. An ESA is not a SA.
1:35:37 so in Florida if you have a 0.08% bac level (or higher) on the breathalyzer you fail and before this time stamp she was tryna say the cops were searching her car without a warrant the thing is they don’t need one if you fail the sobriety test because at that point they have probable cause
The cops never said they'd "let [the passenger] go" if she provided ID. They just said that they'd have to arrest her if she continued to refuse to ID (she's already committed obstruction at that point), and that they'd do their best to get the process moving. If she chose to hear "you'll definitely be free to go" (how could any cop make that promise? What if her ID came back with 30 murder warrants on it?), that's on her. Plus, "free to go" isn't the magic spell she seems to think. Even if one cop says it, even if they mean it, another can then detain you again on the spot. Thinking "free to go" means nobody can touch you is veering into "sovereign citizen" "the law is witchcraft" territory. Plus, the fact of the matter is that being in a motorized conveyance is already shaky ground, whether you're the driver or not. You have a legal right to travel; you don't have a right to do so in a vehicle. That's the Constitution. If you don't like it, write your Reps. I get that she's upset and drunk, but she's also an adult. You're still expected to control yourself. If you can't, you legally have to be taken into custody for the public's safety and your own anyway. When she pulled-away from the officers attempting to stop her, ignored lawful commands to stop, and seemed on the brink of fleeing, she had to be physically detained. Don't start nothing, won't be nothing.
Detainement isn't arrest, and on a normal traffic stop the passenger wouldn't be "detained." The problem here is that this isn't a typical traffic stop, they were suspected of hit and runs, a crime has been committed and they have reasonable suspicion to detain absolutely everyone involved to investigate.
You have a right to have a female officer pat you down, but when you're under investigation for several felony hit and runs everything else you ask for is a request at most.
2:57 Yes. The passengers need to be detained (are not free to leave until the officer says so) as well. This is because, at this point, the officer is not sure who's car this is. For all he knows, they switched places at the last second because the real owner has a suspended license, and therefore, shouldn't be able to just walk away until the investigation concludes.(hypothetical example) Thank you for coming to my Ted Talk 😂
36:00 i most certainty can and will blame her at that point cause SHE MADE THE CHOICE to drive impaired, to hit 3 vehicles, and to put food knows how many lives at risk.
I'm shocked more people don't blame ABS, auto-brewery syndrome. It's this weird thing where your stomach is a distillery. Then again faking an illness is a terrible thing to do.
The person in chat acting shocked saying you didn't go to pre school in response to not knowing your alphabet backwards is crazy. not only would that be - at least for me over 30 years ago - but it's not exactly a skill people brush up on. Like, if a cop said that to me I'd be like hell yeah I can do it, there's gonna be some long pauses as I say the alphabet normally but I got you. You give me the other tasks and I'm acing those.
she is being detained because her car matches the description. white truck with a black front end. the person thought they saw two latina's in the truck but could easily have only saw one and mistakenly guessed the other.
I feel bad for the friend, but like, if you are too high or drunk to comprehend basic instructions, you probably shouldn't go out in public because it's gonna go baaaaad
1:39 I wouldn’t be surprised if that was true, some people just tattooed kanjis just because they look cool without thinking it could mean something like “monkey poop”
Why do cops let people who are obviously acting in bad-faith keep talking? A couple reasons (NB: I'm not an expert). First, a use of force involves a lot of extra paperwork, including, in a lot of PDs, having to have a supervisor attend immediately and take statements from all involved. Big headache, and not something supervisors appreciate if they feel it wasn't necessary. Plus, if a supervisor was already requested, there's no point rushing things, especially as the supervisor probably has a better grasp of and experience with the particulars of the law in question than the officers on-scene. Second, a talking suspect is often a self-incriminating suspect, particularly if they're agitated, intoxicated, or both. This lady is providing more and more evidence for the officers that she's intoxicated, given her words and actions. It's the job of an officer to bring DAs cases they can win, and that means gathering as much evidence to support the charge as possible, as opposed to undermining your case by getting frustrated and making the situation about your ego and conduct, and not the suspect's charges. Third, as was noted, it's basic de-escalation. It's really hard to stay super-mad for an extended period of time, so the more energy a resistant suspect expends, the more likely they are to, in the end, come quietly. And, again, being consistently accommodating in the face of attempted aggravation does a lot to secure any "resisting/obstructing" charge you might want to add-on, and really makes it clear to a judge or jury who was acting responsibly. Fourth and finally, it's part of the PR for the department. The more the public sees officers bending-over backwards to be decent to the least-decent individuals, the more likely they are to co-operate with police, and police who don't have the trust and co-operation of the communities they're policing are worse than useless to the goal of serving the public trust and upholding the law. That's all part of why that egotistical "warrior cop" wannabe-Rambo "dominance-focused" crap is the opposite of policing, just as it's the opposite of animal training.
I feel not enough people know what detained means in this context. Detained means younare not free to leave until the officers investigation is completed. It doesn't mean you're under arrest, or in trouble, it just means you're possibly a part of whatever is going on, and, even if you're just a witness or bystander, officers will at the very least need your statement and name to put into their report to make sure they have a firm grasp on what went down before that got there. To compare your retelling of events to others (especially the suspect). So when you're detained, uts just cause they'll need to talk to you at some point and don't want you to just...leave with no way of contacting you, as there's a possibility that you have a crucial piece of evidence in your story.
i feel bad for the friend/passenger because she turned into the emotional/aggressive for lack of a better term drunk creating a problem for her. the driver was already being the aggressive drunk
If you are in a car that is part of a hit and run even as the passenger, then yes you are in trouble for not reporting the crime. You aren’t hit with the same charges as the driver, and with cooperation you usually aren’t given anything but a warning.
Bit of advice If you get pulled over just cooperate if you think it was invalid or you were treated inappropriately you file a report and take them to court all this is gonna do is aggravate the officer’s involved and escalate the situation . -_-
watching this is going to give me an aneurysm- Emotional Support Animal is not Service Animal... Anyone can (attempt to) claim an animal is a Support Animal. Service Animal is the one that gets all the special permissions. Military Police has Zero jurisdiction over Civilian Police This woman driving was left WAY too long with no consequences for her actions
there should be paperwork assosiated with all service animals, this aboids any BS like karens buying the vest and claiming the animals are service when they are not, specialy when its prescribed by a phsicologist
I think you’re 100% correct about service animals should be registered somehow. Thing is, even though I doin’t think there’s really an official registration now, I know that some entities offer some sort of paper certification identifying a “service animal”, like therapists’ offices, support service providers. ✌️
I saw that you needed this for the algorithm. Also, this woman is being difficult for no good reason. I thank the algorithm for giving me this juicy piece of content on my day off.
So the thing about having to go to the toilet. People use that ALL the time when in these situations. I guess they think they wouldn't be followed to the toilet so they can just walk away afterwards or some dumb shit, but it's an incredibly common tactic for them to try. But let's be honest, 99% of the time it's not going to be a real issue. *They're adults*, people learn to hold it veeery early in life. If it was really that big of an issue, one would imagine they'd stop at a gas station or something to go. That combined with the somewhat smug (even if she was confused) demeanor tells me she just fully believed she could simply refuse to talk and get to leave by going to the toilet. I also think that's the real reason she suddenly turned up on the aggression, she very suddenly realized that wasn't actually going to work.
There are bad cops out there. Cant deny that. But the fact there are people who think all cops need to disappear while we have videos like this is a problem since it leads to more people acting like this
people think all cops are bad because the media outlets promote the bad and often also dont show the full story. media gets more promotion and reactions from rage and such, so good policing is often ignored and suppressed.
@danroe3310 Very unpopular opinion. Floyd passed due to an OD with elevated stress, and that trial was a sham to meet public opinion. Not many people saw the full clip. The officer spent almost 10 minutes trying to calmly get Floyd out of the vehicle while he screamed, "I can't breathe," while in the back of a sedan. Only after 8 minutes of trying to calmly get Floyd to comply, was he pulled out of the vehicle and taken to the ground with force. It was an average forcefull take down for the situation, not using unessisary force like seen in MANY police brutality videos. Knee on neck, debatable. After which he proceeded to scream "I can't breath". That lasted for almost 8 minutes before paramedics arrived. That means the officers acknowledged Floyd was potentially in distress and needed ems. As someone who comes from a big city, 10 min is the min ambulance response time, if not 20 min. Proper procedures were followed in an attempt to get first aid to Floyd was ahead of time, roughly at the time Floyd first started yelling "I can't breath".I can't stand police brutality and abuse of power, but not a single officer involved in that should have been prosecuted. The media promoted tf out of that, told half the story, gave a false narrative, and it became a trial that was decided before it ever began, just to meet public outrage which in return, didn't actually solve anything...
@@danroe3310 that is true, but people are also in large part responsible for this themselves. people cannot just blame the media for how they view the world. as a kid i was often told how bad cops were, always told to stay away from em by my family and media had little to no good stories about cops. but at around the age of 12 i was old enough to start thinking that it made no sense. ''how come all cops are bad, how is that possible?'' so i walked to a cop on patrol and asked him for directions. he had a friendly smile, told me how to get where i needed to be, and when he was done he told how cool my new shoes were. since that day, if i see a cop that aint busy, i will try to make some small talk. and dont get me wrong, i know about bad cops, ive been stopped walking down the street plenty of times for no reason... and im white. XD now, i am dutch and live in the netherlands, so it isnt a 1 to 1 comparison. but ive seen plenty of incredibly kind and friendly cops in america, so i doubt a cop walking his patrol is gonna bite your head off for asking directions. americans are real quick to say they dont trust the media, but when they see a cop painted in the media as a bad cop, that is trustworthy info now, that is just so funny to me. xD
@@RanRayu i have only ever had one bad encounter with police and it was when i was in highschool in a anti white neighborhood. i fell asleep on my desk and dropped my binder so the teacher called the cops saying i was being extremely hostile and "had a knife" so the cop bashed me to the ground the second i woke up from having my shoulder shook. but i encounter cops in the new place i live very often and they are all pretty nice and helpful. and also since i had to start walking to and from work i asked about legal walking routes and they helped out. so yea. the bads are just really rare imo.
@@rainofkittens yea i heard and read about that allot. i was severely disappointed that the defense didnt ask for a transfer of jurisdiction. the court was clearly biased and so was the area so a appeal would have been logical. that said i dont know if it was possible to do so or not.
Imma be honest. I have been a drunk passenger in a drunk driver situation; you don't realize that the driver is drunk until you sober up the next morning (unless you get black out drunk) I was worried that my driver was Hella drunk at one point and asked their friends to put them through a sobriety test. I saw they failed but their friends said they were fine so I trusted them. (APPARENTLY noone thought Uber was the safe choice? ) When they drove me home, I went to sleep. I woke up to honking; they were on the wrong side of the street. Ya know what I did? I went back to sleep. There was nothing that I could do because I had no money in my bank account for an uber (an uber home would have been over $50 which if I over draw my account it's an extra $75) and I was unemployed. Noone else wanted to call for an uber so I just went back to sleep.
I’ve deeply deeply deeply deeply deeply deeply deeply deeply missed Alicia and her phenomenal content (I’m being genuine I absolutely adore her content but this is also to appease the algorithm gawds because the vile hacker knocked her off the algorithm)
Very much, the different jurisdictions are in place for a reason-- a cop from another county or city or state can't just roll up and arrest you for a crime that only applies to their area; for the same reason military police can't arrest you under the same namesake as civilian police unless you're causing trouble pertaining the base they're guarding. Military Police are beholden to the laws on the base, then the military branch, then to the overall Army. They can't operate like police. Police are beholden to the laws of the county, then the state, then to Federal law. They can't operate like military. The distinction is in place because there is a process, and a chain of command. To break the chain is to invalidate the process and make those above you responsible, for actions that are otherwise only applicable to you. Besides reflecting poorly on you, it reflects poorly on them, so they WILL throw the book at you ESPECIALLY if the cause was directly related to you or escalated because of you.
@@Whazzupie not to mention military members may get in trouble for significant others and family trying to wear their military significant others / military families rank.
I didn't realize cops really needed a passenger's ID, but even after she gave her ID, they didn't let her go to the restroom even after saying all she had to do was Identify herself and leave at 33:26. I felt a little bad for her, but maybe she got better friends after this situation.
Everyone gets detained at a traffic stop just in case they are leaving with contraband. I.e flee with the drugs or firearm so the police can't find it. The police also pick up a lot of people with warrants this way.
An officer can detain to get info and see if anyone was aiding/abetting in the actual crime. You can vote the right to not speak but must have ID on you. If not you may be brought in for identification.
The best piece of advice I have to give is; if a op pulls you over for any reason, cooperate, but do not answer any questions that can be construed as a "yes" or "no". If they start probing, say "I would like to speak with my lawyer." and say nothing else. NOTHING, until your lawyer is present. Yes, you'll likely get arrested, but you're not likely to do time unless you're a true dumbass. Also, GET A DASHCAM. One that has a cabin-facing camera, too. Pricey, yes. But prison is less fun than a bit of credit card debt.
To be fair this whole situation went on for an hour and the 2 of them didn't exactly make it easy for the officers. At some point everybodies patience will run out so them getting a bit rough is not surprising.
3:24 detained is not arrested. It just means they’re investigating a possible crime. In the event that there’s more things in the car than a drunk lady, the passenger could also get a charge for running.
She absolutely would not vibe with Donut as much as I love both of them. He uses a lot of harsh language and is extremely blunt when it comes to his breakdowns. Alicia might be a bit too emotionally sensitive for his content.
She might like some of the videos like the more light-hearted videos about goofy cop situations and Karens who try to interfere with a police investigation (particularly the one at the church), but I don't think that she would be into most of the stuff that he posts as most of them are shooting breakdowns or intense police interactions.
Problem is she kept trying to pull away from the officer and was uncooperative the entire time. They won't be gentle when you keep trying to pull away.
30:00 How do people even _get_ tattoos in prison? Contraband tattoo needles? 32:30 She's just soo hiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiaiaigh. High above me. So lovely. 38:00 It may be the police's moral responsibility to accomodate mentally impaired people, but it ain't their job. 49:00 These days only the state has the authority to break willful people. That's the only way to get through to these - and I mean this literally - mental children. By being the adult in the room and introducing consequences. All civvies can do is leave, which fixes nothing of the problem.
3:50 the honest to god rules of being pulled over are as follows by my dad…cooperate with them, do whatever they want…but don’t say shit…you’d be surprised how much can be used against you when you run your mouth. Now if you get pulled over and you haven’t done anything…then you can be a bit more social…still remember that they’re there to fill a quota…
1:22:00 She tied her hair up because she's used to having it tied, and she only untied it, trying to make herself look different. Same reason she changed her shirt.
I think if you're in the vehicle with someone whose been doing hit-and-runs and you haven't done anything to stop it or alert anyone and you're not fearing for your life or anything then that kinda makes you an accessory to the other person's crime... So yeah, they should probably detain the passenger too... Idk if they'd really detain you for info... If you haven't done any crime then I think you're probably free to not say anything and leave...
Omission of duty is a crime, so her not reportig her friend while knowing she did it could get her arrested and even end up as an aggravated sentence if she knew and covered for her. Either way, both are clearly intoxicated, so thats grounds enough to get arrested.
@kutami2951 Well if your the passenger it doesn't matter if your intoxicated or not... They have 'designated drivers' as a thing, that being the person who isn't supposed to drink (or at least not much) so that everyone else in the vehicle afterwards can be totally smashed off alcohol...
@@RealmRabbit Bruh, both were clearly intoxicated and this wasn't their first time causing an accident. Even if you wanna argue that her being extremely drunk and high while on the passenger seat isn't grounds for suspecting, she can totally get arrested for denying to identify herself, which is standard protocol. Not even for cops. Security guards also demand it and can detain you if you refuse identification (at most). Both of them were uncooperative too, so they could might as well get hit with obstruction of justice if the cops feel specially aggravated by their attitude. Being an accessory to a crime can be punitive for you, specially if you're not cooperating.
@kutami2951 Yeah... I'm not saying they shouldn't have detained her while assessing the situation, certainly if she'd be considered an accessory to the crimes that took place... BUT there is no law about just being intoxicated in the passenger seat... If you are so drunk that you're blacking out and you're not the driver, that isn't a crime... That's just obvious... Why tf would it be? The passenger is really just endangering themselves at that point... Maybe you could make some atypical hypothetical up where they're like reaching over to grab at the steering wheel but normally drunk passengers aren't really doing anything like that... And I don't think the passenger was rlly being all that uncooperative really (they were maybe struggling to cooperate through all the alcoholism but I don't think they were fighting too much, would need to rewatch to check... And they weren't answering questions but again could just be the alcohol and I don't think you're required to answer questions in fact a lawyer would probably advise you just plead the fifth on that and do not do so...) So not entirely sure what wasn't cooperative... They weren't running away either... As for identifying I'd also need to rewatch for that... Assuming she was asked and refused to then maybe detain would be justified? Probably not arrest but detain I could maybe see but it also might vary by state... They had good reason to detain the driver though, not arguing that...
@@RealmRabbit She can still be fined if they wanted to slap her wrist hard enough, depending on the drugs she ingested. Resistance can be passive too. If someone curled into a ball and refused to move, they're not doing harm, but they're also resisting. In her case, her resistance was both passive and active since she refused to identify herself and she attempted to get away from the scene (yes, she "thought" she got told she could go away, but what she did was still illegal lol). Also yeah, her refusal to identify herself would at most detain her until they can identify her in some way. I think it's important to remember that resistance can be passive too. You can resist without harming anybody by refusing to identify yourself or to explain what happened. Wasting the time or needlessly enlongating due process is still grounds for resistance to the authorities because the time they're wasting on you could be used to attend other crimes happening. In this instance though, she also attempted to flee, which is honestly a miracle they decided to group with her previous resistance instead of adding another charge on her.
I feel for the brother. I'm an older sibling whose had to deal with younger siblings getting wasted, he's probably facepalming so hard throughout this.
I'd like to point of if her brother is an MP she will cost him his ass if his duty station finds out about this phone call, on top of that MPs hold no authority outside of military installations.
If that’s true then wow that sucks. The brother is telling her to cooperate and to not escalate so if he does get in trouble as a result then in my opinion that messed up.
Only if the brother used his position to try leverageing anything or even getting into the conversation . The brother was just on the phone listening and telling her to cooperate . She was the one making wild claims about the MP getting involved and saving her
" I don't know much about my rights"...mad respect...to meany know nothing about rights and still act like that do ...and for what it's worth you do know the most important ones
i mean, the person in the car if they were in there while she had done the hit and run, and didnt stop them, i feel like that would be warranted. but dont mind me, im a dumb Canadian dude who doesnt pay attention to laws much.
Quick correction: It is NOT your right to pick which cop you want to deal with. When a suspect who has been acting crazy and uncooperative demands to deal with another officer, it's just another way they try to take control of the situation.
Note that she said that you have the right to request a different cop, not the right to pick a different cop.
You cannot ask for a "different cop" - you can ask for a supervisor (which is a different cop 99% of the time), but there is a distinction. It's the speaking to police equivalent of "I'd like to speak to the manager." This is in place to protect police departments from rookies or mentally deficient officers from racking up lawsuits for the department. Failure to call in a supervisor when asked for is basically 100% dismissal of charges unless it was a violent crime or something caught on bodycam.
The reason most people would want to call in a supervisor (and why it's a good idea for anything aside from a standard ticket), is because you remove the arresting/detaining officer from the position of ultimate authority. Many cops do the job because of the authority power trip they get, so when you take that away from them, they're just another dude standing in the back and letting someone else talk.
I mean, I think her asking for a female officer is reasonable. Especially if one is already present. But it's definitely a situational thing rather than a universal thing.
You can request anything but it can also be denied. "There is no legal requirement for police to accommodate your request, but as a matter of policy, they will make an effort to do so."
@@zebrion5793 They can ask for a supervisor but it is they are not required. That’s a misconception people have, that cops have to bring their supervisor upon request and the cop has to stop what they’re doing until they arrive. The person could have their window smash, dragged out the car, put in handcuffs, and in the back of a cop car by the time the supervisor arrives and that’s all legal.
"Your personality is ugly and your clothes dont fit right!"...
God i love you dont ever change.😂
Detained just means 'at this moment you cant leave' it doesnt mean shes being taken anywhere
didn't know this. thx
Yeah, you're "detained" when the police pull you over, and you can't leave until they are done with you, but it doesn't mean you're going to arrest you. Now, if your car gets pulled over and your passenger jumps out and runs for the woods, you're going to have a bad time.
Army MP have different jurisdiction and traffic codes than local police. He was desperate to leave that call 😅
Military police are also particularly sticklers, they have to be because of rowdy servicemen can get on a base-- they're like a step away from teachers pets, except they are also the teachers giving the punishment. But like any facet of the military they have their own culture and demeanor
That Military Police brother was trying real hard to not get himself in trouble and to explain her that she needed to cooperate. He was aware he has no jurisdiction.
Yeah, Vinnie is just like. "Sorry my sister is a drunken embarrassment. Please don't drag me into her stupidity."
"My brother are military police. Therefore, they big police, you smol police, he will save me"
Okay smol note. While cops are allowed to let suspects use the restroom, it is extremely risky. You do not have visual on the suspect at all. They may attempt to flee, tamper with, or destroy evidence. It is a huge mess, typically only saved for low risk suspects or bystanders/witnesses.
Or retrieve a weapon, yes.
Plus, pretty much every difficult suspect I've seen (selection bias, of course, but still) immediately feels the urgent need to pee as soon as they're in cuffs/a squad, so it's not exactly an unknown dodge.
I recently saw an arrest where a lady tried stalling where when she finally took the breath test she was under the legal limit, HOWEVER unless you blow the amount you would without drinking, they do the math for the time it took for you to decrease those levels and then reverse it, so since the math proved she would have been over the legal limit when they arrived, they still arrested her for DUI
So you would basically have to somehow stall till you blow a 0.
“My brother is military police.” That nice, lady, MP has no jurisdiction here.
"Okay. How about I contact his CO for interfering with an investigation." The Sergeant was done playing.
the female officer had true "Mom" energy. that death stare before grabbing her was enough to make my blood run a bit cold lmao. she was fucking DONE with her shit.
I'm trying to do police work if someone says I pay taxes, so I pay your salary, I would say this.Yes, you do, and I pay taxes too. So technically, I pay my own salary and you also pay me to arrest you.
“My taxes pay your salary!” “Sir you are being arrested for tax evasion”
Lmao@@lenny_has_arived6679
@@lenny_has_arived6679 LOL
If the cops stop you, the law supersedes your feelings. Cooperate, keep quiet. Emotional support animals are not a legally recognized thing so leaning on them as excuse will just land you in more trouble. Service dogs are an entire different thing as they are in fact legally recognized and trained.
Exactly. The state has the right to hurt you. And it's not abuse, it's use.
Yup. Even if you feel something was done improperly, you can voice your refusal to give consent, but note that you'll still co-operate on the grounds that you can't object in that context. Court is where these questions are tested, and being reasonable and controlled, even (especially) if the officers aren't, will go a long way with a judge.
@@michaelccozens This 500%! Your cooperation is kept to a minimum to not get into more trouble, likw you said voicing your refusal to consent to searches is pretty much the only thing you should say, at that point your best bet is to either record if possible or right afterwards write everything down and take the contact info of any willing witnesses. The only job is surviving the encounter and documenting as much as possible for your case in court. It saves people a ton of extra hassle.
Not the orb of confusion “ dahhhhh-duiiiiii-duahhhhh”
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Hey guys remember to share Alicia's video around
Her getting hacked took her out of the Algo so we gotta get her back
So, sacrifice virgins to the algorithym gods again? ,_,)
Getting pretty parasocial, huh?
@@Pink.andahalf Not really
She just said to share her videos cause her getting hacked hit her pretty hard in the algo
@@Pink.andahalf Stop using buzzwords you don't know how to use, it's embarrassing.
@@OrbObserver It isn't a buzz word this is absolutely parasocial behavior. No one is sharing youtube videos around lmao
it´s always fascinating see the crazy patience, cops put forth in these situations. mad respect! ... nice, the moment she talked about anxiety, i literally had to burp. What a timing, lol. ... I feel sorry for the brother. ... also they told her, she is free to go AFTER the investigation!
Not to excuse poor cop behaviour, but if I was dealing with that shit weekly for years… I am just saying I understand why some police officers are unhinged.
2:49 little legal info here for ya😊
Detained does not mean arrested. It simply means they are being contained whilst police gather info and attempt to make an arrest.
Imagine 2 friends getting pulled over and both step out of the vehicle, then one takes off running for some reason. Now imagine the same situation but both were placed in handcuffs beforehand. It is significantly harder for the one who attempts to run to get away because of the cuffs and if the other who doesnt run stays, then no charges are filed against them. Its a case of "better safe than sorry"
Yep, and if you have problems with being detained, yelling at the police usually won't help you, as if you make enough of a public display of a stink; it could get propped up to public disorder charge if the officers feel overzealous. Then you *would* be arrested, in essence for just talking back sternly
Even then, if you have a complaint, there's still a process and you're supposed to submit the complaint AFTER being released, or processed at a station. The worst thing you can do is become volatile WHILE being detained or arrested, because that means they have recorded 'evidence' that your detention was justified, even if the reason for detention or arrest was BS to begin with and shouldn't have happened
Shitty as it sounds, as there are equally bad cops as there are good cops, best thing to do is stay emotionally level and make your grievances known aloud, but not in a way that's threatening or combative. Majority of interactions with police are recorded, via chest cam or dashboard, which while intended to help police, also helps you define context when they're pulled for evidence whenever there is a complaint.
YOUR rights are important, and they NEED to be cited, but at the appropriate times
Ohhh
@@Whazzupie Correct, when the cops stop you and start an investigation that is not the place to try an litigate you case, that is for the court, filming them is your only line of defense but you must cooperate. People really need to understand that charges are not like Pokemon you do not need to catch them all! Too many times people get into arguments with the police and escalate into the resisting arrest, disorderly conduct combo for no good reason. Raising a public stink mid police stop as if you are a victim of a great injustice only works if the cops are in the wrong, she was no damsel in distress though, she gaslighted and lied and denied which was probably used against her in court. The part of her naming her brother as an attorney early in the video could also result in her brother getting in trouble for impersonating a lawyer if the brother didn't correct her.
@@alexisrivera200xablei agree. Even if the cop is wrong it is always better to just cooperate and take action after the fact. It can save your life and possibly get you money if its a legal case.
There's a big difference between an "Emotional Support Animal" and a "Service Animal". Service animals are trained and get certified. Emotional support animals can really just be any pet that brings comfort to someone with mental health issues. Most of the time theres no actual legal distinction between an ESA and a regular pet, but some states and cities have policies allowing them into places regular pets cant go. The problem is its not something you can disprove, and so there's this stigma in the service industry that many people who claim to have ESA's are just saying that so they can bring the pet to a restaurant or supermarket
There was actually a story recently about an emotional support duck getting kicked out of a Buc-ee's. Buc-ee's allowed service dogs, and the duck owner tried to argue that there was such a thing as a "service duck"
That lady was racking up charges like a Karen on Black Friday.
Charges are in fact, not like Pokemon... You don't need to "catch them all!" yet people like her sure try their hardest.
Gotta catch em all! Convictèd!@@alexisrivera200xable
Not 'like a' karen. She is one.
Isn't it funny how people like this lady only remember they have dependents when they think they can use them to get-out of consequences? If she cared about the dog, to say nothing of "not endangering it by drunk-driving with the dog in the car", she would have mentioned its care right off the top. Instead, she only brought it up when all her other attempts to delay or deny her arrest had failed. It's all very "kid kills their parents and then requests mercy on the grounds of being an orphan".
If you only use your dependents as a shield, you're not their caregiver; you're their exploiter. Less parent, more pimp.
100% the passanger is holding and trying to get to the restroom to flush it
I think they both were holding. The Karen in the purple shirt kept touching herself with an open fly.
"Why did you pull me over!?!" "You seem to have an itchy left flap, maam."
Remember the last body cam girl who had to pee and ran then drove off? I guess it happens often enough they just started saying no.
Body cam reactions and Vtubers
Name a more iconic duo
Vtubers and shoeonhead reactions?
@@bobobsen4104 that too lol
John Mulaney's The One Thing You Can Not Replace story and AU animations
VTubers and 40k lore
Brother: "there's really nothing i can do, here, and they're pretty much right"
Her: "see? he needs to be here, and is explaining exactly why you're wrong."
16:22 so if you think you can wait out the alcohol it would take multiple hours. In most reports the length of time is taken into account when doing blood alcohol tests.
I almost choked and spat out my coffee when you started parroting "Identify! Identify!"
Friendly reminder that an “emotional support animal” (ESA) is not an animal that was trained at all and there is no official status for it. A “service animal” (SA) actually undergoes training to perform a service. It can be one or more services, but they can clearly and directly be articulated. An ESA is not a SA.
Lol you dont get to declare that nobody is detained when a crime has been listed
1:35:37 so in Florida if you have a 0.08% bac level (or higher) on the breathalyzer you fail and before this time stamp she was tryna say the cops were searching her car without a warrant the thing is they don’t need one if you fail the sobriety test because at that point they have probable cause
The cops never said they'd "let [the passenger] go" if she provided ID. They just said that they'd have to arrest her if she continued to refuse to ID (she's already committed obstruction at that point), and that they'd do their best to get the process moving. If she chose to hear "you'll definitely be free to go" (how could any cop make that promise? What if her ID came back with 30 murder warrants on it?), that's on her. Plus, "free to go" isn't the magic spell she seems to think. Even if one cop says it, even if they mean it, another can then detain you again on the spot. Thinking "free to go" means nobody can touch you is veering into "sovereign citizen" "the law is witchcraft" territory. Plus, the fact of the matter is that being in a motorized conveyance is already shaky ground, whether you're the driver or not. You have a legal right to travel; you don't have a right to do so in a vehicle. That's the Constitution. If you don't like it, write your Reps.
I get that she's upset and drunk, but she's also an adult. You're still expected to control yourself. If you can't, you legally have to be taken into custody for the public's safety and your own anyway. When she pulled-away from the officers attempting to stop her, ignored lawful commands to stop, and seemed on the brink of fleeing, she had to be physically detained. Don't start nothing, won't be nothing.
Detainement isn't arrest, and on a normal traffic stop the passenger wouldn't be "detained." The problem here is that this isn't a typical traffic stop, they were suspected of hit and runs, a crime has been committed and they have reasonable suspicion to detain absolutely everyone involved to investigate.
You have a right to have a female officer pat you down, but when you're under investigation for several felony hit and runs everything else you ask for is a request at most.
2:57
Yes. The passengers need to be detained (are not free to leave until the officer says so) as well. This is because, at this point, the officer is not sure who's car this is. For all he knows, they switched places at the last second because the real owner has a suspended license, and therefore, shouldn't be able to just walk away until the investigation concludes.(hypothetical example)
Thank you for coming to my Ted Talk 😂
Yup if anything it is just to get info from all those involved in the scene for paperwork.
my favorite way to tell someone their wrong(like chatters who like to 'correct' people) is 'thank you for incorrecting me' XD
Jesus Christ, being arrested and being detained are two fundamentally different things...
36:00 i most certainty can and will blame her at that point cause SHE MADE THE CHOICE to drive impaired, to hit 3 vehicles, and to put food knows how many lives at risk.
Food knows sounds funny but I like it
I'm shocked more people don't blame ABS, auto-brewery syndrome. It's this weird thing where your stomach is a distillery. Then again faking an illness is a terrible thing to do.
I assume most people don’t know about it.
The person in chat acting shocked saying you didn't go to pre school in response to not knowing your alphabet backwards is crazy. not only would that be - at least for me over 30 years ago - but it's not exactly a skill people brush up on. Like, if a cop said that to me I'd be like hell yeah I can do it, there's gonna be some long pauses as I say the alphabet normally but I got you. You give me the other tasks and I'm acing those.
she is being detained because her car matches the description. white truck with a black front end. the person thought they saw two latina's in the truck but could easily have only saw one and mistakenly guessed the other.
I feel bad for the friend, but like, if you are too high or drunk to comprehend basic instructions, you probably shouldn't go out in public because it's gonna go baaaaad
The first person literally says "I have my insurance and my license, you cannot detain me," to a freaking police officer
1:39 I wouldn’t be surprised if that was true, some people just tattooed kanjis just because they look cool without thinking it could mean something like “monkey poop”
Why do cops let people who are obviously acting in bad-faith keep talking? A couple reasons (NB: I'm not an expert).
First, a use of force involves a lot of extra paperwork, including, in a lot of PDs, having to have a supervisor attend immediately and take statements from all involved. Big headache, and not something supervisors appreciate if they feel it wasn't necessary. Plus, if a supervisor was already requested, there's no point rushing things, especially as the supervisor probably has a better grasp of and experience with the particulars of the law in question than the officers on-scene.
Second, a talking suspect is often a self-incriminating suspect, particularly if they're agitated, intoxicated, or both. This lady is providing more and more evidence for the officers that she's intoxicated, given her words and actions. It's the job of an officer to bring DAs cases they can win, and that means gathering as much evidence to support the charge as possible, as opposed to undermining your case by getting frustrated and making the situation about your ego and conduct, and not the suspect's charges.
Third, as was noted, it's basic de-escalation. It's really hard to stay super-mad for an extended period of time, so the more energy a resistant suspect expends, the more likely they are to, in the end, come quietly. And, again, being consistently accommodating in the face of attempted aggravation does a lot to secure any "resisting/obstructing" charge you might want to add-on, and really makes it clear to a judge or jury who was acting responsibly.
Fourth and finally, it's part of the PR for the department. The more the public sees officers bending-over backwards to be decent to the least-decent individuals, the more likely they are to co-operate with police, and police who don't have the trust and co-operation of the communities they're policing are worse than useless to the goal of serving the public trust and upholding the law.
That's all part of why that egotistical "warrior cop" wannabe-Rambo "dominance-focused" crap is the opposite of policing, just as it's the opposite of animal training.
I feel not enough people know what detained means in this context.
Detained means younare not free to leave until the officers investigation is completed. It doesn't mean you're under arrest, or in trouble, it just means you're possibly a part of whatever is going on, and, even if you're just a witness or bystander, officers will at the very least need your statement and name to put into their report to make sure they have a firm grasp on what went down before that got there. To compare your retelling of events to others (especially the suspect).
So when you're detained, uts just cause they'll need to talk to you at some point and don't want you to just...leave with no way of contacting you, as there's a possibility that you have a crucial piece of evidence in your story.
i feel bad for the friend/passenger because she turned into the emotional/aggressive for lack of a better term drunk creating a problem for her. the driver was already being the aggressive drunk
If you are in a car that is part of a hit and run even as the passenger, then yes you are in trouble for not reporting the crime. You aren’t hit with the same charges as the driver, and with cooperation you usually aren’t given anything but a warning.
That went on so long, her soup got cold
Bit of advice If you get pulled over just cooperate if you think it was invalid or you were treated inappropriately you file a report and take them to court all this is gonna do is aggravate the officer’s involved and escalate the situation . -_-
watching this is going to give me an aneurysm-
Emotional Support Animal is not Service Animal... Anyone can (attempt to) claim an animal is a Support Animal. Service Animal is the one that gets all the special permissions.
Military Police has Zero jurisdiction over Civilian Police
This woman driving was left WAY too long with no consequences for her actions
there should be paperwork assosiated with all service animals, this aboids any BS like karens buying the vest and claiming the animals are service when they are not, specialy when its prescribed by a phsicologist
I think you’re 100% correct about service animals should be registered somehow. Thing is, even though I doin’t think there’s really an official registration now, I know that some entities offer some sort of paper certification identifying a “service animal”, like therapists’ offices, support service providers. ✌️
I saw that you needed this for the algorithm. Also, this woman is being difficult for no good reason.
I thank the algorithm for giving me this juicy piece of content on my day off.
"YOU GOT MATCHING SOCKS!?"
I feel that.
fun fact if you only buy one color of socks you'll always have matching socks :D
So the thing about having to go to the toilet.
People use that ALL the time when in these situations. I guess they think they wouldn't be followed to the toilet so they can just walk away afterwards or some dumb shit, but it's an incredibly common tactic for them to try.
But let's be honest, 99% of the time it's not going to be a real issue. *They're adults*, people learn to hold it veeery early in life. If it was really that big of an issue, one would imagine they'd stop at a gas station or something to go.
That combined with the somewhat smug (even if she was confused) demeanor tells me she just fully believed she could simply refuse to talk and get to leave by going to the toilet. I also think that's the real reason she suddenly turned up on the aggression, she very suddenly realized that wasn't actually going to work.
An hour and change of Alicia reacting to a Karen, I love this
I have to say that I'd never have made it through this video without your commentary being so damn funny. Pure chaos! Lol
There are bad cops out there. Cant deny that. But the fact there are people who think all cops need to disappear while we have videos like this is a problem since it leads to more people acting like this
people think all cops are bad because the media outlets promote the bad and often also dont show the full story. media gets more promotion and reactions from rage and such, so good policing is often ignored and suppressed.
@danroe3310 Very unpopular opinion. Floyd passed due to an OD with elevated stress, and that trial was a sham to meet public opinion. Not many people saw the full clip. The officer spent almost 10 minutes trying to calmly get Floyd out of the vehicle while he screamed, "I can't breathe," while in the back of a sedan. Only after 8 minutes of trying to calmly get Floyd to comply, was he pulled out of the vehicle and taken to the ground with force. It was an average forcefull take down for the situation, not using unessisary force like seen in MANY police brutality videos. Knee on neck, debatable. After which he proceeded to scream "I can't breath". That lasted for almost 8 minutes before paramedics arrived. That means the officers acknowledged Floyd was potentially in distress and needed ems. As someone who comes from a big city, 10 min is the min ambulance response time, if not 20 min. Proper procedures were followed in an attempt to get first aid to Floyd was ahead of time, roughly at the time Floyd first started yelling "I can't breath".I can't stand police brutality and abuse of power, but not a single officer involved in that should have been prosecuted. The media promoted tf out of that, told half the story, gave a false narrative, and it became a trial that was decided before it ever began, just to meet public outrage which in return, didn't actually solve anything...
@@danroe3310 that is true, but people are also in large part responsible for this themselves. people cannot just blame the media for how they view the world.
as a kid i was often told how bad cops were, always told to stay away from em by my family and media had little to no good stories about cops. but at around the age of 12 i was old enough to start thinking that it made no sense. ''how come all cops are bad, how is that possible?'' so i walked to a cop on patrol and asked him for directions. he had a friendly smile, told me how to get where i needed to be, and when he was done he told how cool my new shoes were. since that day, if i see a cop that aint busy, i will try to make some small talk.
and dont get me wrong, i know about bad cops, ive been stopped walking down the street plenty of times for no reason... and im white. XD
now, i am dutch and live in the netherlands, so it isnt a 1 to 1 comparison. but ive seen plenty of incredibly kind and friendly cops in america, so i doubt a cop walking his patrol is gonna bite your head off for asking directions.
americans are real quick to say they dont trust the media, but when they see a cop painted in the media as a bad cop, that is trustworthy info now, that is just so funny to me. xD
@@RanRayu i have only ever had one bad encounter with police and it was when i was in highschool in a anti white neighborhood. i fell asleep on my desk and dropped my binder so the teacher called the cops saying i was being extremely hostile and "had a knife" so the cop bashed me to the ground the second i woke up from having my shoulder shook.
but i encounter cops in the new place i live very often and they are all pretty nice and helpful. and also since i had to start walking to and from work i asked about legal walking routes and they helped out. so yea. the bads are just really rare imo.
@@rainofkittens yea i heard and read about that allot. i was severely disappointed that the defense didnt ask for a transfer of jurisdiction. the court was clearly biased and so was the area so a appeal would have been logical. that said i dont know if it was possible to do so or not.
Imma be honest. I have been a drunk passenger in a drunk driver situation; you don't realize that the driver is drunk until you sober up the next morning (unless you get black out drunk)
I was worried that my driver was Hella drunk at one point and asked their friends to put them through a sobriety test. I saw they failed but their friends said they were fine so I trusted them. (APPARENTLY noone thought Uber was the safe choice? ) When they drove me home, I went to sleep. I woke up to honking; they were on the wrong side of the street.
Ya know what I did? I went back to sleep. There was nothing that I could do because I had no money in my bank account for an uber (an uber home would have been over $50 which if I over draw my account it's an extra $75) and I was unemployed. Noone else wanted to call for an uber so I just went back to sleep.
Even without being drunk, i bet you shes hit everything but the lottery with her tahoe
I’ve deeply deeply deeply deeply deeply deeply deeply deeply missed Alicia and her phenomenal content (I’m being genuine I absolutely adore her content but this is also to appease the algorithm gawds because the vile hacker knocked her off the algorithm)
I love her energy so much. I aspire to only have a fraction of the chaos she holds.
can't a military PO getting involved in a case that the military isn't involved in and there not even present for result in punishment?
Very much, the different jurisdictions are in place for a reason-- a cop from another county or city or state can't just roll up and arrest you for a crime that only applies to their area; for the same reason military police can't arrest you under the same namesake as civilian police unless you're causing trouble pertaining the base they're guarding.
Military Police are beholden to the laws on the base, then the military branch, then to the overall Army. They can't operate like police.
Police are beholden to the laws of the county, then the state, then to Federal law. They can't operate like military.
The distinction is in place because there is a process, and a chain of command. To break the chain is to invalidate the process and make those above you responsible, for actions that are otherwise only applicable to you. Besides reflecting poorly on you, it reflects poorly on them, so they WILL throw the book at you ESPECIALLY if the cause was directly related to you or escalated because of you.
@@Whazzupie not to mention military members may get in trouble for significant others and family trying to wear their military significant others / military families rank.
“Hey man, how was your trip to Florida?”
“Oh, you know, it was good. I caught some crabs, I think I ate some too”
I didn't realize cops really needed a passenger's ID, but even after she gave her ID, they didn't let her go to the restroom even after saying all she had to do was Identify herself and leave at 33:26. I felt a little bad for her, but maybe she got better friends after this situation.
Everyone gets detained at a traffic stop just in case they are leaving with contraband. I.e flee with the drugs or firearm so the police can't find it.
The police also pick up a lot of people with warrants this way.
Someone said this but it's probably to flush drugs. Trusting people is stupid in that job. 😅
she's could have been holding (aka holding drugs) and going to the bathroom is the perfect excuse to go and flush them.
People REALLY don't understand what Miranda rights are for or when they need to do them.
Ah yes, the duality of drunkness: Confused drunk, and angy drunk. XD
That tattoo says, "chicken soup".
It looks like a 444 tattoo and it means purity, honesty, and integrity which is ironic.
If it was 222 it means peace and faith.
She gives us sociopath a bad name, I can handle being around corpses and high stress very well and it allows me to function while others can't
An officer can detain to get info and see if anyone was aiding/abetting in the actual crime. You can vote the right to not speak but must have ID on you. If not you may be brought in for identification.
The best piece of advice I have to give is; if a op pulls you over for any reason, cooperate, but do not answer any questions that can be construed as a "yes" or "no". If they start probing, say "I would like to speak with my lawyer." and say nothing else. NOTHING, until your lawyer is present. Yes, you'll likely get arrested, but you're not likely to do time unless you're a true dumbass. Also, GET A DASHCAM. One that has a cabin-facing camera, too. Pricey, yes. But prison is less fun than a bit of credit card debt.
The side of the cop cars say "New Smyrna Beach", that's in Florida.
To be fair this whole situation went on for an hour and the 2 of them didn't exactly make it easy for the officers. At some point everybodies patience will run out so them getting a bit rough is not surprising.
My mother is a narcissist. So I understand the levels of stupid with this.
3:24 detained is not arrested. It just means they’re investigating a possible crime. In the event that there’s more things in the car than a drunk lady, the passenger could also get a charge for running.
A movie-length video about Karens? This is going to be good lol
You know, i'm curious if she'd like donut operator. Granted, those are much different from these, but why not send her his way?
I feel she's too wholesome for Donut. As goofy and fun as he is, he's pretty edgy and can cover more serious stuff too.
She absolutely would not vibe with Donut as much as I love both of them. He uses a lot of harsh language and is extremely blunt when it comes to his breakdowns. Alicia might be a bit too emotionally sensitive for his content.
She might like some of the videos like the more light-hearted videos about goofy cop situations and Karens who try to interfere with a police investigation (particularly the one at the church), but I don't think that she would be into most of the stuff that he posts as most of them are shooting breakdowns or intense police interactions.
Where is a roll of duct tape when you need it. She just kept digging her hole deeper and deeper.
Problem is she kept trying to pull away from the officer and was uncooperative the entire time. They won't be gentle when you keep trying to pull away.
30:00 How do people even _get_ tattoos in prison?
Contraband tattoo needles?
32:30 She's just soo hiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiaiaigh.
High above me. So lovely.
38:00 It may be the police's moral responsibility to accomodate mentally impaired people, but it ain't their job.
49:00 These days only the state has the authority to break willful people.
That's the only way to get through to these - and I mean this literally - mental children.
By being the adult in the room and introducing consequences.
All civvies can do is leave, which fixes nothing of the problem.
3:50 the honest to god rules of being pulled over are as follows by my dad…cooperate with them, do whatever they want…but don’t say shit…you’d be surprised how much can be used against you when you run your mouth. Now if you get pulled over and you haven’t done anything…then you can be a bit more social…still remember that they’re there to fill a quota…
1:22:00 She tied her hair up because she's used to having it tied, and she only untied it, trying to make herself look different. Same reason she changed her shirt.
I think if you're in the vehicle with someone whose been doing hit-and-runs and you haven't done anything to stop it or alert anyone and you're not fearing for your life or anything then that kinda makes you an accessory to the other person's crime... So yeah, they should probably detain the passenger too... Idk if they'd really detain you for info... If you haven't done any crime then I think you're probably free to not say anything and leave...
Omission of duty is a crime, so her not reportig her friend while knowing she did it could get her arrested and even end up as an aggravated sentence if she knew and covered for her.
Either way, both are clearly intoxicated, so thats grounds enough to get arrested.
@kutami2951 Well if your the passenger it doesn't matter if your intoxicated or not... They have 'designated drivers' as a thing, that being the person who isn't supposed to drink (or at least not much) so that everyone else in the vehicle afterwards can be totally smashed off alcohol...
@@RealmRabbit Bruh, both were clearly intoxicated and this wasn't their first time causing an accident.
Even if you wanna argue that her being extremely drunk and high while on the passenger seat isn't grounds for suspecting, she can totally get arrested for denying to identify herself, which is standard protocol. Not even for cops. Security guards also demand it and can detain you if you refuse identification (at most).
Both of them were uncooperative too, so they could might as well get hit with obstruction of justice if the cops feel specially aggravated by their attitude.
Being an accessory to a crime can be punitive for you, specially if you're not cooperating.
@kutami2951 Yeah... I'm not saying they shouldn't have detained her while assessing the situation, certainly if she'd be considered an accessory to the crimes that took place... BUT there is no law about just being intoxicated in the passenger seat... If you are so drunk that you're blacking out and you're not the driver, that isn't a crime... That's just obvious... Why tf would it be? The passenger is really just endangering themselves at that point... Maybe you could make some atypical hypothetical up where they're like reaching over to grab at the steering wheel but normally drunk passengers aren't really doing anything like that...
And I don't think the passenger was rlly being all that uncooperative really (they were maybe struggling to cooperate through all the alcoholism but I don't think they were fighting too much, would need to rewatch to check... And they weren't answering questions but again could just be the alcohol and I don't think you're required to answer questions in fact a lawyer would probably advise you just plead the fifth on that and do not do so...) So not entirely sure what wasn't cooperative... They weren't running away either...
As for identifying I'd also need to rewatch for that... Assuming she was asked and refused to then maybe detain would be justified? Probably not arrest but detain I could maybe see but it also might vary by state...
They had good reason to detain the driver though, not arguing that...
@@RealmRabbit She can still be fined if they wanted to slap her wrist hard enough, depending on the drugs she ingested.
Resistance can be passive too. If someone curled into a ball and refused to move, they're not doing harm, but they're also resisting. In her case, her resistance was both passive and active since she refused to identify herself and she attempted to get away from the scene (yes, she "thought" she got told she could go away, but what she did was still illegal lol).
Also yeah, her refusal to identify herself would at most detain her until they can identify her in some way.
I think it's important to remember that resistance can be passive too. You can resist without harming anybody by refusing to identify yourself or to explain what happened. Wasting the time or needlessly enlongating due process is still grounds for resistance to the authorities because the time they're wasting on you could be used to attend other crimes happening. In this instance though, she also attempted to flee, which is honestly a miracle they decided to group with her previous resistance instead of adding another charge on her.
At 52:09 The way she looks the cop directly in the eyes and then proceeds to scratch her you know what i cannot bro
I feel for the brother. I'm an older sibling whose had to deal with younger siblings getting wasted, he's probably facepalming so hard throughout this.
I'd like to point of if her brother is an MP she will cost him his ass if his duty station finds out about this phone call, on top of that MPs hold no authority outside of military installations.
If that’s true then wow that sucks. The brother is telling her to cooperate and to not escalate so if he does get in trouble as a result then in my opinion that messed up.
Only if the brother used his position to try leverageing anything or even getting into the conversation . The brother was just on the phone listening and telling her to cooperate . She was the one making wild claims about the MP getting involved and saving her
I don’t know why, but I found it hilarious that none of that silence when she let the cat out got cut out. Just left it in.😂
" I just move my eyes, whatchu mean !?" 😂
I would have believed them too about the soup too.
" I don't know much about my rights"...mad respect...to meany know nothing about rights and still act like that do ...and for what it's worth you do know the most important ones
1:13:06 oh this is New Smyrna my brother lives there
Thank you Alicia for making the video bearable with your jokes.
It was very tiring to watch.
great video
These Karens make me look like Einstein I swear
This came right as I got back down the Karen rabbit hole, lol. Also glad the channel is back!
🎵I am a disability girl and I live in a disability world🎵
"what can she see through these?" certainly not why kids love cinnamon toast crunch.
“I pray for you and I pray for your mother”…………..”yea well I pray for you and I pray for the pimp that’s gotta deal with you girl” lol
you need to watch Boze vs the world. I think you would enjoy her channel
Today at work a Karen was yelling at the manager because she had a bad day and she forgot to submit her order for groceries
AN HOUR & A HALF??? You’re too good to us, queen 😔🙏👑
If the other chick had just shown her ID when asked, she could've gone pee an hour ago.
didnt she say she didnt have her ID on her?
@@danroe3310Yea, it just magically appeared in her hands to give to the officers after the phone call.
@@danroe3310 she somehow managed to provide it near the end before being stuffed into a cruiser
@@D3th10rdmeh i was half asleep during the video so i missed it
i mean, the person in the car if they were in there while she had done the hit and run, and didnt stop them, i feel like that would be warranted. but dont mind me, im a dumb Canadian dude who doesnt pay attention to laws much.