I am very interested in puzzles and quizzes and I was scrolling through TH-cam and I saw This, so I decided to get one and I watched this video before so I fixed it quite quick. Thank you for making this video!!
I found this puzzle in one of my boxes, lubed it up and I actually love the super bumpy clicky feel. Great video and solution SCR. This is one puzzle that I never cared to solve because it looks so nice unsolved, almost cant tell. If I ever want to actually solve it ill watch this video for the fifth time. Im just going to mess around with it and enjoy the madness. Cheers. Also halfway through this video its giving me a nice Super Antonio Vivaldi vibe for some reason.
The packaging also makes it a little more obvious with molecules around the name and in Chem classes when you model molecules, you use balls like that to practice structure and bonds.
I tried this myself, and it worked! Turns out there is more than 1 solution to the cube, because my paper is completely different than how yours turned out. This is actually a really fun 3D sudoku puzzle
I solved it by making a drawing (like you) and then placing a green corner in a random place on the front face. This allowed me to place the second green corner, and also the corner opposite from the original on the front face had to be the opposite of the center color. Red edge opposite violet edge, then the two remaining corners I paired up with opposite colors and same with the remaining edges. From here the puzzle fell into place, and I was able to solve it like a normal 3x3. Here's the diagram of that face: G R I W Y D B V O I used D for black ("dark") and I for dark blue (indigo). This also removed the problem of different colors needing to occupy the same space, because everything already has a place to go.
I know you commented this a long time ago, but in the off chance you see this reply, what did you mean when you said "solved it like a normal 3x3?" I can solve a 3x3, but I don't know what you meant by that. As in, what step are you talking about in regards to solving a 3x3?
One thing for everyone to keep in mind, there are multiple solutions! Don't just watch this and copy his solution, work it out yourself, and it will be much more worth your while! I solved mine by deciding which pieces need to be in the top and bottom layers (I used black for bottom, white for top), based on colors and whether they were an edge or corner, then figuring out what needs to go into the middle layer based on those results. If you want to figure it out on your own, this would be a good place to start! Here's what I started with (cyan = light blue for me): Black side corners: orange, white, cyan, and green. Black side edges: blue, red, yellow, and purple. White side corners: yellow, blue, green, and black. White side edges: orange, purple, cyan, red.
That was a good way to solve it from the start. Last night I spent about 1 hour trying to solve direct in cube and it was a complete fail ahahahha. Btw I was trying to do the same thing you did, but it is hard to see without a sketch. Thanks for show me the step I was missing :)
I was given this cube for Christmas and had it solved within the same day after spending a lot of time inspecting it. What I noticed is that the green corners are always opposite, and that the yellow/orange, white/black, and blue/dark blue run in bands around the cube from green to green corner. So if you follow from a green corner down a side you might see white then black, and then going diagonally you'll see another white, then hit the other corner. Continuing you'll get a black/white/black band along the next side and diagonal, creating a band. This holds true for all three sides emanating from the green corners, with yellow/orange being the second, and blue/dark blue being the third. As for the red/purple, they form an alternating ring visible from either green corner, and the easiest way to decide where they go is that on each face, they are the sides opposite the green corner, and they will always be the same orientation when looked at from green. My typical solving strategy is to pick a green corner, and build the cross as usual. I typically choose white or black as my first layer, and looking from the corner, I'll position a yellow side beside my green if I see orange on the opposite side, or blue if I see dark blue, etc. This give me two of the sides on my top cross. The other two opposite the green corner will be red and purple, in whichever orientation you prefer, as long as you keep it consistent. Next is top corners, which will be the continuation of each line starting from the green corner. So after the yellow side will be an orange corner, after the white center will be an opposite black corner, etc. That solves the top face, at which point I flip the entire thing over. The middle layer has four sides to position. The white/blacks will be on opposite sides and should be a continuation of the lines. A red and purple will be on the other two opposing sides, and will be positioned against the red and purple on what is now the bottom, according to the orientation you decided for red/purple before. Finally the third layer I typically solve similar to the first layer, keeping in mind that the new green corner should be opposite the old one. Using standard 3x3 permutations to solve as normal. It *is* possible to encounter a parity error at this stage, as the red and purple sides aren't marked. I find swapping your third and second layer red or purple usually solves this. So yeah, no writing on paper or solving sudoku. The cube is a very logical layout with patterns you can exploit to find your solution.
I solved this puzzle. Using all manner of chicanery, mapping, charting, and a couple Latin incantations. I never even took it out of its package prior to mapping it out.
(Didn't watch the video yet, just posting my opinion) It seems to me a corner-first method would work here way better than something like beginner's or CFOP. Those methods give you 1 color each time to eliminate from a side, while solving corners first you have 4 reference colors eliminated. First of all, as far as I can see from the video, the cube STARTS with corners solved, technically, since all the corners are different colors. That means you don't actually have to solve them. From there you can use EPLL with setup moves to switch any non-matching edges into place, and finally use the flower alg (M' E' M E) to switch centers in case you need to (or you can do that before edges so you don't have to worry about preserving them).
+Cube Kid Depends on the situation. Usually Ortega but sometimes CLL if I k ow the case. On 3x3 I often do CFOP but sometimes switch it up and do ZZ or Roux. On 4x4 it's usually Hoya with 6-2 edge pairing. Pyraminx is keyhole but a bit of an intuitive 1-flip. I don't do megaminx but it is basically an extremes version of a 3x3.
Oh, now i know why its solving solution is different than the solution of a rubics cube coz the corners i mean corner ball and the edge of the molecube just have 1 shade
Seems like you'd have to solve the color scheme on paper, then do standard 3x3 type moves. I don't wanna finish the video though until I've gotten the puzzle myself and tried it!
I show this exact thing in the video. Bring up an identical edge to one that is already on the top layer and do an PLL that swaps those two edges and the two corners. Then bring the edge back down.
SpeedCubeReview Okey dokey! First things first, thanks for replying! Second, I had tried the algorithm you showed in the video but it messed up the rest of the cube. So I tried it again because it could've just been my mistake. It didn't work. Then I tried other algorithms that I found but none of those worked either. And as I'm sitting there staring at those last two frustrating and infuriating pieces, I remembered that when I first got the cube, it came apart while I was playing with it. Only two pieces fell off, but I apparently put them back in the wrong spots. But now they're back in the right spots and I mixed it up again to see if that was the issue, and it was. It's solved now! Yay! I still feel kinda like an idiot though. But anyway, thank you for your help!
Technically, all the red pieces and what you called purple (I've been calling it magenta) are interchangeable, which would give a second set of solutions that aren't just mirror images. I also vaguely remember an unrelated solution when I first solved this puzzle, so if I can't hunt down my paper where I did mapping like you did, I could confirm it works or not.
So it has come to my attention that my cube is impossible to solve for orange I had a corner, edge, edge and if u think about it there isn't a way for 2 oranges to not interfere I spent like an hour trying to get it to work but it's impossible
+Troopy Stoopy you can also switch two other edges that are the same color and do something like an H or a Z permutation. Or you can switch the two green corners and do something maybe like a Y or T perm. Just set up moves before hand.
SpeedCubeReview whenever im on the last layer, i try to always have the green in the correct place and change it accordingly, should i do something else?
+Troopy Stoopy if you just need to switch to individual edge pieces that is impossible and I 3 x 3. You can switch to edge pieces and two corners in since the two green ones are the exact same you can just swap those two and the two edges with an algorithm.
You have a lot of matching pieces. You can always bring an edge up that matches another one, lets say the red edge, do a J perm, T perm, Y perm or whatever is necessary and then move that other edge back down.
Every time I ask my friend to scramble my cube, they always try to not let any touch, so once they asked me to make none of the colors next to each other. So I solved to cube. And made a checkerboard pattern.
A 3x3 has one distinct color on each side and 20 moving pieces that are all different. This puzzle has 9 colors on each side and each color has 3 similar pieces which could be mixed up.
Lucie Wodskou think of it this way A 3 by 3 corner piece has 3 colors But if you look at this cube, one-whole corner is the same color Same for the other pieces of this cube
+JUSTIN All MIGHTY you solve it exactly like a 3 x 3. It's no different than a regular Rubiks Cube. You just have to follow this color guide to know where each piece goes.
I got the cube today and after about 6 hours I solved it. I found a picture of the fully solved cube graphed out like a 3x3 scramble, and then just solved exactly like a 3x3, although with extra headaches. The tutorial was by Mr.Roux86
give this to a non-cuber: "I'll scramble it so that they aren't the same colors on the same side"
A cube thats solved "scrambled."
*I'm in love.*
AHAHAHAHAHH xd
I am very interested in puzzles and quizzes and I was scrolling through TH-cam and I saw
This, so I decided to get one and I watched this video before so I fixed it quite quick. Thank you for making this video!!
I found this puzzle in one of my boxes, lubed it up and I actually love the super bumpy clicky feel. Great video and solution SCR. This is one puzzle that I never cared to solve because it looks so nice unsolved, almost cant tell. If I ever want to actually solve it ill watch this video for the fifth time. Im just going to mess around with it and enjoy the madness. Cheers. Also halfway through this video its giving me a nice Super Antonio Vivaldi vibe for some reason.
Who else thought it was pronounced mole (animal) cube?
I'm probably just dumb.
+TwistAL it does look like that. Once you make that connection of molecule it makes a bit more sense though
mmhm, I'm starting to see the connection between molecules and the mole-cube now.
The packaging also makes it a little more obvious with molecules around the name and in Chem classes when you model molecules, you use balls like that to practice structure and bonds.
TwistAL meeeee
TwistAL I did
those balls make me hungry it looks like cheewy candy
Ruzaini Roosfa omg yeas
Do you even know what you just said
“Those balls” yes
Ruzaini Roosfa chewy*
Ruzaini Roosfa and you forgot a comma after hungry
I tried this myself, and it worked! Turns out there is more than 1 solution to the cube, because my paper is completely different than how yours turned out. This is actually a really fun 3D sudoku puzzle
I've solved the same way you did it. but it took me so much more time. but your explanation is much better then mine. good job!
Took me a second to understand what you where doing but now I understand it’s just like solving and actual sudoku!
I just went layer by layer and eventually it worked. Yours is way cooler though.
I solved it by making a drawing (like you) and then placing a green corner in a random place on the front face. This allowed me to place the second green corner, and also the corner opposite from the original on the front face had to be the opposite of the center color. Red edge opposite violet edge, then the two remaining corners I paired up with opposite colors and same with the remaining edges. From here the puzzle fell into place, and I was able to solve it like a normal 3x3.
Here's the diagram of that face:
G R I
W Y D
B V O
I used D for black ("dark") and I for dark blue (indigo).
This also removed the problem of different colors needing to occupy the same space, because everything already has a place to go.
I know you commented this a long time ago, but in the off chance you see this reply, what did you mean when you said "solved it like a normal 3x3?" I can solve a 3x3, but I don't know what you meant by that. As in, what step are you talking about in regards to solving a 3x3?
wait does it have magnets or something?
+Pigeon Productions ball bearings.
+SpeedCubeReview ahh gotchu
Pigeon Productions yes it does...
SpongeClan no its doesnt
It's the same as a regular 3x3 but with balls instead of cubies. (If that's what they're called)
This cube is so satisfying to watch be turned. I'd really enjoy a timelapse of some solves
One thing for everyone to keep in mind, there are multiple solutions! Don't just watch this and copy his solution, work it out yourself, and it will be much more worth your while! I solved mine by deciding which pieces need to be in the top and bottom layers (I used black for bottom, white for top), based on colors and whether they were an edge or corner, then figuring out what needs to go into the middle layer based on those results. If you want to figure it out on your own, this would be a good place to start! Here's what I started with (cyan = light blue for me):
Black side corners: orange, white, cyan, and green.
Black side edges: blue, red, yellow, and purple.
White side corners: yellow, blue, green, and black.
White side edges: orange, purple, cyan, red.
That was a good way to solve it from the start. Last night I spent about 1 hour trying to solve direct in cube and it was a complete fail ahahahha. Btw I was trying to do the same thing you did, but it is hard to see without a sketch.
Thanks for show me the step I was missing :)
Is it the same as solving a sudoku cube?
That's not entirely accurate. It's a similar process for coming up with a solution, but it's not the same puzzle.
King Yakko Cubing l
no this one was way easier
TengYang no it isn’t, google sudoku cube
King Yakko Cubing 8
I was given this cube for Christmas and had it solved within the same day after spending a lot of time inspecting it. What I noticed is that the green corners are always opposite, and that the yellow/orange, white/black, and blue/dark blue run in bands around the cube from green to green corner. So if you follow from a green corner down a side you might see white then black, and then going diagonally you'll see another white, then hit the other corner. Continuing you'll get a black/white/black band along the next side and diagonal, creating a band. This holds true for all three sides emanating from the green corners, with yellow/orange being the second, and blue/dark blue being the third.
As for the red/purple, they form an alternating ring visible from either green corner, and the easiest way to decide where they go is that on each face, they are the sides opposite the green corner, and they will always be the same orientation when looked at from green.
My typical solving strategy is to pick a green corner, and build the cross as usual. I typically choose white or black as my first layer, and looking from the corner, I'll position a yellow side beside my green if I see orange on the opposite side, or blue if I see dark blue, etc. This give me two of the sides on my top cross. The other two opposite the green corner will be red and purple, in whichever orientation you prefer, as long as you keep it consistent.
Next is top corners, which will be the continuation of each line starting from the green corner. So after the yellow side will be an orange corner, after the white center will be an opposite black corner, etc. That solves the top face, at which point I flip the entire thing over.
The middle layer has four sides to position. The white/blacks will be on opposite sides and should be a continuation of the lines. A red and purple will be on the other two opposing sides, and will be positioned against the red and purple on what is now the bottom, according to the orientation you decided for red/purple before.
Finally the third layer I typically solve similar to the first layer, keeping in mind that the new green corner should be opposite the old one. Using standard 3x3 permutations to solve as normal. It *is* possible to encounter a parity error at this stage, as the red and purple sides aren't marked. I find swapping your third and second layer red or purple usually solves this.
So yeah, no writing on paper or solving sudoku. The cube is a very logical layout with patterns you can exploit to find your solution.
Splungified ...tmi TMI
2:49 it's magenta
Pennwise The Dancing Clown i
Those drawing skills are on point
How can I swap 2 opposite edges
As long as you swap two more edges or two corners as well.
Or are the edges supposed to be flipped and be swapped 🧐🤨🤓
It doesn't matter if any pieces are flipped or twisted.
i know, but it is not an H perm or a T perm
Notice what I do in this video. You set up a couple pieces to do something like a T perm to swap two of the same colors.
Non cubers say: That is not solved man!
Cubers: its solved!
Non cubers:No its not
Kirsten Chloe Rabanillo ur an army?
Does this work if you have already scrambled it?
+William Brassette Yes. It's just a 3x3
I solved it by putting one of each on top and bottom sides-b/w- in cube explorer then figured out horizontal slice edges easily
It would be cool to, once you got the solution on paper, solve it with old pochman 🤔
This is actually quite an elegant solution
And how did you solve it?
I solved this puzzle. Using all manner of chicanery, mapping, charting, and a couple Latin incantations. I never even took it out of its package prior to mapping it out.
(Didn't watch the video yet, just posting my opinion)
It seems to me a corner-first method would work here way better than something like beginner's or CFOP. Those methods give you 1 color each time to eliminate from a side, while solving corners first you have 4 reference colors eliminated.
First of all, as far as I can see from the video, the cube STARTS with corners solved, technically, since all the corners are different colors. That means you don't actually have to solve them.
From there you can use EPLL with setup moves to switch any non-matching edges into place, and finally use the flower alg (M' E' M E) to switch centers in case you need to (or you can do that before edges so you don't have to worry about preserving them).
yovli porat love that alg bro
MEME
Can you tell me what methods you use for 2x2-4x4, pyraminx, and megaminx?
+Cube Kid Depends on the situation. Usually Ortega but sometimes CLL if I k ow the case. On 3x3 I often do CFOP but sometimes switch it up and do ZZ or Roux. On 4x4 it's usually Hoya with 6-2 edge pairing. Pyraminx is keyhole but a bit of an intuitive 1-flip. I don't do megaminx but it is basically an extremes version of a 3x3.
Thanks!
so basically is like sudoku ?
I have a 3x3 sudoku cube. It is difficult as hell, usually I take the pieces out and put them back together.
hopefully someone can answer my question as soon you get the f2l do you automataccally do the t perm?
No. You solve like a regular 3x3. Depending on whatever the last layer is you might need to do any of the PLLs
THX so much I was wondering if I should get it but like you said it's to hard so thx!
I did not say it’s too hard. It has its own challenges making it very fun. Any sort of variation on 3x3 can be fun. Just like shape mods.
Okie THX
Oh, now i know why its solving solution is different than the solution of a rubics cube coz the corners i mean corner ball and the edge of the molecube just have 1 shade
*Can you flip corners?*
Orientation doesn’t matter on this
I just went off youtube. Wow. You’re fast!
Ya!
What's the t permutation u used
I have all my algorithms listed at www.SpeedCubeReview.com/PLL
SpeedCubeReview- in your color chart. the black and white "center" pieces are switched in comparison to the actual molecube.
What if your on the last layer and two adjacent edges needs to be swapped
Swap them and two matching corners as well with any alg that does two swaps. J or R perm would work
I bet it would have the best corner cutting
Seems like you'd have to solve the color scheme on paper, then do standard 3x3 type moves. I don't wanna finish the video though until I've gotten the puzzle myself and tried it!
Ya. I’ve been told some people did it without but it was fun doing it on paper first.
Thanks for the tutorial. I usually approach the solve with CFOP. But the end always gets me lol parity. 😅
I swear I get parity...two oposite corners are always switched.
+rockplay100 That is not parity. That is just needing to do something like I show. A T perm but you swap identical edges as wel
I have 2 corners on the same side that need swapped and that's all. The rest of it is solved except those darn corners. Any ideas?
I show this exact thing in the video. Bring up an identical edge to one that is already on the top layer and do an PLL that swaps those two edges and the two corners. Then bring the edge back down.
SpeedCubeReview Okey dokey! First things first, thanks for replying! Second, I had tried the algorithm you showed in the video but it messed up the rest of the cube. So I tried it again because it could've just been my mistake. It didn't work. Then I tried other algorithms that I found but none of those worked either. And as I'm sitting there staring at those last two frustrating and infuriating pieces, I remembered that when I first got the cube, it came apart while I was playing with it. Only two pieces fell off, but I apparently put them back in the wrong spots. But now they're back in the right spots and I mixed it up again to see if that was the issue, and it was. It's solved now! Yay! I still feel kinda like an idiot though. But anyway, thank you for your help!
You can use any PLL that you need to swap pieces around the list of the main ones for a 3x3 are at SpeedCubeReview.com/PLL
CAREFUL!! Your gonna open the gates of hell if u solve it!!! 😱😱😱😱😱!!
awesome video
Where did you buy it?from vat19?
I was going to get it at Target but got it from Amazon instead.
Analizza Haither ?? Vat19? Lol
SpeedCubeShop
Target
Doesn't this solve like a normal cube?
+Jason Bourne Much more difficult. It turns like a 3x3 but much harder to find the solution.
Like a sudoko cube bruh
Its a shape mod though, like a ghost cube or axis cube. This makes it far more difficult.
there is only one solved state for the molecube?
+Zen Lim yes. Although a mirrored state might be possible.
Technically, all the red pieces and what you called purple (I've been calling it magenta) are interchangeable, which would give a second set of solutions that aren't just mirror images. I also vaguely remember an unrelated solution when I first solved this puzzle, so if I can't hunt down my paper where I did mapping like you did, I could confirm it works or not.
You could also use Old Pochmann or m2 that's what I would probably do myself
helpp!! i followed your colour guide and im stucked with only 2 corners need to be switched w/ each other :/
I show that exact thing in the video. You can swap two identical edges and do any PLL needed. I believe I show a T perm being used in the video.
hi LINH NGUYEN, toi cung bi y nhu truong hop cua ban, ban da lam duoc chua co the chi dum toi duoc ko thanks
if you could solve this color coded, that would be amazing, but it's impossible
that cube is so weird
i read the title as mole (animal) cube and i dont read it any other way. its stuck in my head that way forever.
So Im kinda confused. Mine has a green center peice and 2 green edge peices, and no matter what I do one side is gonna have 2 green pieces
Me: watch this
Also me: take a bucket full of red paint and then throw the cube in the bucket 😎
How can I do i permutation?
It depends on which one. I have all PLLs listed at www.SpeedCubeReview.com/PLL
SpeedCubeReview the problem is, that my case on this cube is just like a pll parity.
No such thing for a 3x3. Remember you can swap identical colors just like I show in this video.
its like solving Sudoku and a Rubik's cube at the same time...
So it has come to my attention that my cube is impossible to solve for orange I had a corner, edge, edge and if u think about it there isn't a way for 2 oranges to not interfere I spent like an hour trying to get it to work but it's impossible
Can you be a crazy guy that doesn't follow the solving solution and solve it the rubics cube way?
This is solving a normal way but knowing where each piece goes by guessing and checking is nearly impossible.
I thunk you mean having one colour on wvery side, but since every piece only has 1 colour it wouldn't work
Let's not forget it has 9 colours
theres always two edges that need to be switched, and i cant get them correctly, any help?
+Troopy Stoopy you can also switch two other edges that are the same color and do something like an H or a Z permutation. Or you can switch the two green corners and do something maybe like a Y or T perm. Just set up moves before hand.
SpeedCubeReview whenever im on the last layer, i try to always have the green in the correct place and change it accordingly, should i do something else?
+Troopy Stoopy if you need to switch to edges you can also swap the two green pieces.
SpeedCubeReview im a bit confused by "switching" the corners, what d you mean by that?
+Troopy Stoopy if you just need to switch to individual edge pieces that is impossible and I 3 x 3. You can switch to edge pieces and two corners in since the two green ones are the exact same you can just swap those two and the two edges with an algorithm.
*when ur math teacher gives u homework*
Please tell me how to solve this parity
It's not "Parity" but just a regular 3x3 which ONLY has even amounts of swaps needed. You just swap two edges and two identical corners or vice-versa
So you're basically just using PLL algorithms to mover the colors around? I got all the colors except two haha I'm so close
You can use any PLL to swap pieces around. Remember that there are many pieces that are the same color that can swap places.
two corners on mine need to be switched and since that isn't possible on a 3x3 i don't know what to do
You have a lot of matching pieces. You can always bring an edge up that matches another one, lets say the red edge, do a J perm, T perm, Y perm or whatever is necessary and then move that other edge back down.
Every time I ask my friend to scramble my cube, they always try to not let any touch, so once they asked me to make none of the colors next to each other. So I solved to cube. And made a checkerboard pattern.
WitherQueen1805 lol totally me people are trying to get no 2 next to each other and I do checkerboard
I couldn't even solve the 1x1x1 of that...
you better tell me how to solve the cube with pictures, where the center is too round and when fully soures , the centers upside down or sideways ?
+peras argentinas What? The pieces are all one solid color. There is no "upside down or sideways"
THANKS I GOT MINE SOLVED
Lol I used the picture of each side using this video to use the Friedrich's method. And I solved it.
Lol l was about to comment if you would consider using old pochman but right as I started typing you said you might try using commutators in the video
You say yellow like YOLO
Ooh, Molecool! Me like.
How is it different to a 3x3??
A 3x3 has one distinct color on each side and 20 moving pieces that are all different. This puzzle has 9 colors on each side and each color has 3 similar pieces which could be mixed up.
Lucie Wodskou think of it this way
A 3 by 3 corner piece has 3 colors
But if you look at this cube, one-whole corner is the same color
Same for the other pieces of this cube
Very very different theres only one center one edge and one corner of each color
Its like a sudoku puzzle with colors
Jalia Copeland and you have to figure out turning into place too
I still can't get it
+JUSTIN All MIGHTY you solve it exactly like a 3 x 3. It's no different than a regular Rubiks Cube. You just have to follow this color guide to know where each piece goes.
If you Said ITS Like a rubiks Cube i can solve it normally? Cross, F2L, OLL, PLL?
Yes. That’s how I show it when I solve it only you never need OLL.
I dont understand! It is scrambled in All video. It mustn’t Need to have one hole white face, one black and other faces?
No. You want one of each color on each face. There are 9 colors. It’s like a Sudoku with colors instead of numbers.
that "purple" is called magenta
I challenge you to solve it like a normal 3x3x3.
i'm probably just gonna solve it like a 3x3x3 i'm too dumb to solve it like a sudoku
Help I’m on pll with lbl
So, I’d like a molecube guide for dummies. When you started saying things like T rotation I new I should have never scrambled this cube.
I got the cube today and after about 6 hours I solved it. I found a picture of the fully solved cube graphed out like a 3x3 scramble, and then just solved exactly like a 3x3, although with extra headaches. The tutorial was by Mr.Roux86
Molecule... Molecube... when people draw diagrams with particles, they usually draw circles.
Plz tell me that this wasn't an intended pun.
There is something with the sound of pen hitting the paper
This was way longer than it should be
Lol after I first scrambled mine no joke I got it in under 5 minutes. Luck? I think not.
I read this like ‘mowl - kewb’
This is funny
I like this video (for the newest giveaway)👏
is this guy a legal genus yet
Seems easy like a 3*3 after you get the diagram
I thought you needed to get each color to its middle like a Rubix cube cube
That wouldn’t work since there are nine colors
SpeedCubeReview oh that is what I thought lol I’m dum
i was about to get that
My is mixed up and I can't solve it and I can't find a vid to solve one that I can solve it with
+JUSTIN All MIGHTY This one :)
How do I put it back together with the paper because Every time I try it don't work
+JUSTIN All MIGHTY You just solve it like a 3x3. The paper was how I figured out where each piece needs to be.
Its just like a 3x3x3 rubicks cube just moley
It’s like sudoku
but how do I solve parity
There is no odd parity. If you just have two corners needed to swap, swap two identical edges as well with a T, R or J perm.
Tried to do this for months, even wrote in journals and shit. It’s solved now though. And I don’t care if i cheated 🤷♂️
I'm 12 and i need help finding a video that will help me solve a rubix cube
You should watch Noah Richardson's beginner tutorial (updated) That's the best beginner tutorial around.
For the one that know how to solve a rubix cube it like that
I have it
hes a genius
I Just bought this
Ocd people will be pissed how some of the lines in the square aren't all the way through.......
Im ocd..... So distracting.....
WoW - I have different colored centers