The Schrödinger Equation Explained in 60 Seconds

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 30 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 390

  • @herp_derpingson
    @herp_derpingson 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1643

    Video title: Can I Explain the Schrödinger Equation in 60 Seconds?
    Me: No
    Me: * Watches video *
    Me:

    • @domainofscience
      @domainofscience  4 ปีที่แล้ว +185

      Haha brilliant. That's how I feel about most of quantum mechanics tbh.

    • @chillphil967
      @chillphil967 4 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      wait would comments be fermions or bosons..?

    • @rodrigoappendino
      @rodrigoappendino 4 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      @@chillphil967 Bósons, because they don't have spin (spin 0).

    • @TeslaElonSpaceXFan
      @TeslaElonSpaceXFan 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@rodrigoappendino Ohh, and what about 100%? 1/√2 + 1/√2 != 1

    • @rodrigoappendino
      @rodrigoappendino 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@TeslaElonSpaceXFan You forgot to square the coefficients of the base states.

  • @dominik.w1226
    @dominik.w1226 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2519

    watching at x2 speed -> understanding Schrödinger's equation in 30 secs

    • @wibufisika9606
      @wibufisika9606 4 ปีที่แล้ว +54

      Download the video, speed it up, then you can understand it in faster than light!

    • @vitery100
      @vitery100 4 ปีที่แล้ว +23

      You live in 2090

    • @dillbourne
      @dillbourne 4 ปีที่แล้ว +33

      Physics professors HATE this ONE trick!

    • @mihapetek3418
      @mihapetek3418 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Smert

    • @amanrawatskosmos4548
      @amanrawatskosmos4548 4 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      @@wibufisika9606 nope! Then it will take 2 minutes to only download 😂😉

  • @somerandomguy___
    @somerandomguy___ 4 ปีที่แล้ว +701

    Alternative title : explaining the schrödinger equation speedrun any%

  • @domainofscience
    @domainofscience  4 ปีที่แล้ว +637

    Hey this is just a bit of an experiment. Sometimes you just want a quick introduction to something rather than diving into a full 20 min video. And it was a fun challenge to see if I could explain it in a minute. I'm still working on longer videos but might make more of these. What do you think?

    • @katelinhudak1947
      @katelinhudak1947 4 ปีที่แล้ว +41

      Yes, really enjoyed the quick video, would like to see more!

    • @karthikdulam9830
      @karthikdulam9830 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Nice, that's this bit, that's that bit.

    • @YeeLeeHaw
      @YeeLeeHaw 4 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      These are great because it forces the teacher to remove unnecessary bloat and can focus on the fundamentals instead.

    • @madeofcake6972
      @madeofcake6972 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Obviously this video was just for fun, but it would be good to see a more in depth video on it! Cheers.

    • @fernweh3726
      @fernweh3726 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Certainly I do not appreciate this format, to me it seems useless

  • @edibesare
    @edibesare 4 ปีที่แล้ว +261

    That was really brilliant for a minute.

  • @waficlabban8658
    @waficlabban8658 4 ปีที่แล้ว +121

    You had me in the first minute not gonna lie

  • @moffboffjoe
    @moffboffjoe 4 ปีที่แล้ว +105

    I forgot that this was only 60s, the end caught me completely off guard

  • @LookingGlassUniverse
    @LookingGlassUniverse 4 ปีที่แล้ว +63

    Nailed it! 😍

  • @emanoelanselmo180
    @emanoelanselmo180 4 ปีที่แล้ว +102

    "Can I Explain the Schrödinger Equation in 60 Seconds?": yes
    Can I understand the Schrödinger Equation in 60 Seconds?: no, but i like the speedrun.

    • @samblock4937
      @samblock4937 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      It’s not that complicated

    • @gerardo49078
      @gerardo49078 3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      @@samblock4937 Whoa, easy there, Tesla

    • @golden1975
      @golden1975 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@gerardo49078 it really isn't

    • @redtoxic8701
      @redtoxic8701 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @@golden1975 to understand what he explained not, but I still don't know what more than half of the symbols mean

    • @mikuculus3720
      @mikuculus3720 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@redtoxic8701 you need a background in math it’s mostly partial derivatives

  • @englebertmagentaschweiger1447
    @englebertmagentaschweiger1447 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    This is the best brief explanation of the Schrödinger equation I've ever seen. Well done.

  • @davidhd7816
    @davidhd7816 4 ปีที่แล้ว +34

    If you keep going like this, you,ll make every each one of us a quantum physicist.

  • @GediMini
    @GediMini 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Didn't even see the title before clicking on the video. Was shocked when it just ended abruptly. But great video! It can't be easy to explain a concept so well in is so few words

  • @wmelstan
    @wmelstan 4 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    It would be really interesting to watch about laser cooling and why it is not using in our regular life as an opposite of infrared heaters, to cool the surface of our bodies and furniture without cooling an air inside the room.

  • @petaflop.
    @petaflop. 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The first minute of the video was really crazy!

  • @TotalImmort7l
    @TotalImmort7l 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Thank you very much for this Top tier content.

  • @Exler_Ko
    @Exler_Ko ปีที่แล้ว +1

    i was actually hoping for the explanation to the equation

  • @ad.i
    @ad.i 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Man this is REALLY COOL. Well done :D

  • @ankanart03
    @ankanart03 4 ปีที่แล้ว +88

    Physicist : Quantum Physics is very complicated
    DOS : Hold my 1m video 😄😄😄

    • @S20171
      @S20171 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      This is chemistry

    • @mathskafunda4383
      @mathskafunda4383 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@S20171 And Physics.

  • @lazarusunkwon6
    @lazarusunkwon6 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    So basically it's a partial differential equation adapted to the realm of discrete mathematics? I thought it would turn out to be more difficult, but if I were to compare it to other theories in the fields of science, like Das Kapital from economics, phylosophy and a bit of calculus; it turns out to be quiet easy. Just use your imagination and that's all. Thanks a lot to this man I can see that vague idea a lot clearer now, but at the same time it shows the long way I still need to develop it. Once more thank you very much DoS.

  • @luc7478
    @luc7478 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    It hits exactly the spot.

  • @SerumCRM114
    @SerumCRM114 4 ปีที่แล้ว +29

    I learned more from you in one minute than a whole semester of quantum chemistry 😂

    • @crazyraptor2907
      @crazyraptor2907 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Omg I wanna study quantum chemistry

    • @gabrielchavez6066
      @gabrielchavez6066 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@crazyraptor2907 How are you doing so far?

  • @yoshikojanededel4306
    @yoshikojanededel4306 4 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Never clicked on something so fast

  • @deepakvpd9535
    @deepakvpd9535 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    We want more of these shorts please❤️

  • @david_porthouse
    @david_porthouse 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The Schroedinger equation is ambiguously a wave equation and an equation of tachyonic Brownian motion. There's more than one way to travel faster than light, and these two behaviours are orthogonal to each other. Interesting things happen when our entity interacts with an electromagnetic field.

  • @rv706
    @rv706 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Rather than "energy stays the same in time", I would say: "energy is what generates the dynamics", which is quite literally true from the math.

  • @throwaway7425
    @throwaway7425 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    actually more useful than my textbook, thank you

    • @VarunSaiHere
      @VarunSaiHere ปีที่แล้ว

      your textbook must be your username tho🤣

  • @mayurvalvi13
    @mayurvalvi13 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I would love to see more vids like this ! This is a quick revision and very helpful 🤝👏👏👏👏👏

  • @romanbykov5922
    @romanbykov5922 4 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    Easy!
    Neo: I know Quantum Physics.
    Morpheus: Show me.

  • @rock3tcatU233
    @rock3tcatU233 ปีที่แล้ว

    This was an awesome explanation!

  • @englishinenglish3473
    @englishinenglish3473 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    It’s amazing, even after 2 month working with it , have found new for a minute )

  • @alexbailey791
    @alexbailey791 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I think this was very successful and helpful

  • @jackshih6084
    @jackshih6084 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    To those don't know wave equation, it is Asin(kx-wt) for a periodic wave(including EM wave)

  • @tiong2351
    @tiong2351 4 ปีที่แล้ว +62

    Minute physics Xd

    • @mobizoid2571
      @mobizoid2571 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      😅😅😂😂👍

    • @adamxue6096
      @adamxue6096 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Actually, why *_ISN'T_* this on Monute Physics instead XD

  • @kumailaziz146
    @kumailaziz146 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very Clear and GREAT!!!
    Go ahead and make more videos at the same way

  • @woufff_
    @woufff_ 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Brilliant, reminds me of minutephysics, feel free to be flexible with the timing too :)

  • @rivv6796
    @rivv6796 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Alternative title : Can you understand Schrodinger's equation in 60 secs?

  • @strangerannie
    @strangerannie 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Schrödinger : you doesn't spell my name correctly, how can you derive equation

  • @sinecurve9999
    @sinecurve9999 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    How my quantum mechanics professor described the Schrodinger Equation: it's like the diffusion equation, but time is complex.

    • @DrAtomics
      @DrAtomics 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Lol, he is over complicating things... That sucks to get those kinds of professors

  • @sabrinae.6361
    @sabrinae.6361 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    This video was incredibly helpful, thank you.

  • @spaghettimeatballs6352
    @spaghettimeatballs6352 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You should do a map of Earth Science, because Earth Science is one of the 4 main sciences, and is the only one of the 4 mains missing (includes geology, meteorology, oceanology, etc.)

  • @iliketrains0pwned
    @iliketrains0pwned 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you very much, my assignment is due TONIGHT!

  • @JohnVKaravitis
    @JohnVKaravitis 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    0:12 Whether you treat it as a particle or a wave depends on what you are studying. Electrons do have particle behavior, but they also have wave behavior. FYI, I am wrapping up my BS - Physics, and have taken two Quantum Mechanics classes.

    • @seanki98
      @seanki98 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      you have to sweep a hell of a lot under the carpet to make a minute video on quantum physics

  • @thecoolpanther3103
    @thecoolpanther3103 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great! Your channel is very cool!

  • @himstitute9030
    @himstitute9030 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    please start a map series for classs 11th and 12th for every chapter

  • @billoddy5637
    @billoddy5637 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Dude, this equation is mad wavey!

  • @aadityapratap007
    @aadityapratap007 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    That's exactly how I'll describe it next time to someone who dont know about it. Thanks.

  • @RobertHildebrandt
    @RobertHildebrandt 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Love this!

  • @TheQuackingGuy
    @TheQuackingGuy 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    This feels very wrong. Trying to act like partial derivative with respect to time means "over time" and Hamiltonian acting on ψ meaning "Energy stays the same" can't be true. What you're describing is "total derivative of Hamiltonian is zero". Is that where schrodinger comes from?

    • @shoaibakhtar4389
      @shoaibakhtar4389 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Can you explain me in detail?

    • @markho4958
      @markho4958 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      As a PhD student in Physics, this video is so wrong. Schrodinger Equation does NOT mean "energy stays the same".
      The correct way to interpret the Schrodinger Equation is: "Energy (or Hamiltonian) is the generator of time evolution of a wavefunction".
      To understand this sentence more easily, one can try to understand another similar statement "Momentum is the generator of space evolution(or translation)" , which is essentially saying "because an object have momentum, it translates( or it moves)"

    • @shoaibakhtar4389
      @shoaibakhtar4389 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@markho4958 Thanks for explanation bro

  • @kassakal4530
    @kassakal4530 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    you are PERFECTO
    One question. Wave function we are talking about is the representation of wave shape, right? (a simple example: Amplitude=sin(t))

  • @yungifez
    @yungifez 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I'm getting cringed up
    I learn something in class today and a youtuber posts it
    This is the third time this week

    • @DrAtomics
      @DrAtomics 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Same here!

  • @DrAtomics
    @DrAtomics 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Currently taking quantum class, this was well timed lol.

  • @Dyslexic-Artist-Theory-on-Time
    @Dyslexic-Artist-Theory-on-Time 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Based on what this video says we have photon ∆E=hf electron interaction continuously transforming potential energy into the kinetic Eₖ=½mv² energy of matter, in the form of electrons as an uncertainty ∆×∆pᵪ≥h/4π probabilistic future comes into existence.

  • @kennethbrack4061
    @kennethbrack4061 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you ! I knew the Schrodinger equation had to do with wave functions and it was important and comprehensive but that is all I knew. So it is basically a conservation of energy equation ! Ah. So simple.

  • @jaari2032
    @jaari2032 4 ปีที่แล้ว +58

    Nobody:
    The smart guy in the movie over complicating a simple thing with science stuff which don’t make sense

    • @tomimated1638
      @tomimated1638 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I mean, it’s pretty well justified in its complexity, he explained a basic proxy for understanding a single character (repeated in triplicate), but it would probably take either of us several hours at least to use it to calculate the potential electron locations for like a caesium atom or something.

    • @strangerannie
      @strangerannie 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      But the main problem is detecting the neutrinos at the particle accelerator of our laboratory which can make annihilation of antineutrinos present there

  • @scienceentanglement2180
    @scienceentanglement2180 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Can I understand the Schrodinger equation in 60 seconds?
    yes yes yes yes yes
    yes yes yes yes yes
    ye s yes yes yes yes
    yes yes yes yes yes

  • @mathadventuress
    @mathadventuress 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    That left me with more questions than answers lol

  • @macovv7320
    @macovv7320 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    It was excellent, eventhough I don't know what wave functions, that made some sense Because I know what kinetic and potential energies are

  • @B05S
    @B05S 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for clarifying

  • @BluetonicUK28
    @BluetonicUK28 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Amazing job

  • @MrGotmymojoworkin
    @MrGotmymojoworkin 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Fantastic . Thank you very much.

  • @imjustpassinthru
    @imjustpassinthru 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I'm not exactly new to this subject. I'm a working class guy with a good basic understanding of quantum mechanics because that sort of thing interests me. I get really frustrated with scientific language -- i.e., the "narrative" part of a theory in between the math equations -- because it's often vaguely written and subjective. Searching the internet for a basic definition of the Schrodinger equation, I keep reading that the equation deals with the evolving state of a "dynamic system." That's what I wanna know about. What all is included in the meaning of a "dynamic system?" The word "system" sounds like more than just one particle. Is the Schrodinger equation applicable to an atom? A molecule? A cluster of molecules? How about just a single electron or photon?

  • @ju1911
    @ju1911 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Up next please:
    How to understand the Schrödinger equation in 60 seconds

  • @dorottyachoma2430
    @dorottyachoma2430 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I wish I saw this video before my physical chemistry exam. :D

  • @dosomething3
    @dosomething3 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Really brilliant

  • @siddharthpatil3099
    @siddharthpatil3099 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Is Schrödinger's equation applicable to all the particles present in different dimensions of the universe,like if there is a particle moving in 5th dimension. And if I want to prove that dark matter consist of gravitons,will this eq help to prove it

  • @cccircuit8296
    @cccircuit8296 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good job!

  • @theonebuffdudeSHORTS
    @theonebuffdudeSHORTS 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Well done

  • @aaaaahhhhhh6969
    @aaaaahhhhhh6969 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Resolution is trivial and left as an exercise for the reader

  • @pelasgeuspelasgeus4634
    @pelasgeuspelasgeus4634 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Can you tell us when and how was experimentally proven the validity of that equation?

  • @wassollderscheiss33
    @wassollderscheiss33 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I need this explained in detail to a somewhat layman (engineer)

  • @parthmehta909
    @parthmehta909 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Could you please make a video on special theory of relativity

  • @TheDogn
    @TheDogn 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Saw the video and clicked it, duh. Then it was over in 60 seconds 😆 took me by surprise. But then I though about it and realized how genius it was. 🤔

  • @harshchaurasia5869
    @harshchaurasia5869 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The uncertainty principle says that you can't simultaneously make people understand the SE as well as make the video short

  • @1Reevee
    @1Reevee 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    once I learned what psi was the whole equation became much less scary

  • @pegah9413
    @pegah9413 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Yep, you nailed it! Now I have to go find another video that tells me what all those symbols are for. There is no end to curiosity B)

  • @Atlasik
    @Atlasik 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    when you have 1 minute left till your online meeting

  • @MrAndrewiphone1
    @MrAndrewiphone1 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Now you should do "Can I Explain the Schrödinger Equation in 60 minutes"

  • @craftbuzzwonky4752
    @craftbuzzwonky4752 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Now please accept a challenge of explaining this in 45 hours!

  • @alurma
    @alurma 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    hey! make more of those :)

  • @rimasfaxi6165
    @rimasfaxi6165 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can you please explain the dirac equation??

  • @gaurangshekhar
    @gaurangshekhar 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    please make a 10min video with more data and deeper explaination

  • @volbla
    @volbla 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Now explain how to find that wave function :)

  • @yashgarg4864
    @yashgarg4864 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wow, That will help in my quiz tomorrow.....
    But seriously guys, wish me luck

  • @mipsuperk
    @mipsuperk 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Short video, but I still watched it at 2x speed. Ain't nobody got time for normal speed videos.

  • @strwz
    @strwz 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    great, now make me understand the Schrodinger equation in 60 seconds

  • @BiggFanDDD
    @BiggFanDDD 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Now make a 1 hour video describing it

  • @dnhdfnfkrjxjxfjjggj3002
    @dnhdfnfkrjxjxfjjggj3002 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    In only 60 seconds, a minute passed here😳😳🤯

  • @BCdesu
    @BCdesu 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The real minute physics

  • @coastsidescience
    @coastsidescience 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Anyone know what program is used to make these vids? I'm a science teacher and would love to use something similar .. Great vid btw! Thanks :-)

  • @muhammadhaikal1896
    @muhammadhaikal1896 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Nice, Now I can register for Harvard

  • @ValidatingUsername
    @ValidatingUsername 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Integrating a resistance to further bending of space time metric would solve lots of problems mathematically 😊

  • @db112nl
    @db112nl 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Now make these 3 minutes and you have something amazing going.

  • @mynameisgleeriplaypiano4620
    @mynameisgleeriplaypiano4620 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can you explain about Multiverse with Many Worlds Theory?

  • @kitesurfingspot
    @kitesurfingspot 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    That was fun!

  • @pravargupta6285
    @pravargupta6285 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I have already studied standard string waves so this video was extremely easy for me to understand.!!

  • @sukursukur3617
    @sukursukur3617 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Does electron obey morlet wavelet pattern?

  • @muhammadahmad4610
    @muhammadahmad4610 ปีที่แล้ว

    which software use for making videos?

  • @mynameisbryanok
    @mynameisbryanok 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I know DoS stands for Domain of Science, but are you also making a reference to the density of states?

  • @kagannasuhbeyoglu
    @kagannasuhbeyoglu 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Respect👍

  • @utsavbose424
    @utsavbose424 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    What software can be used to make such video and edits?