Actual Unedited "Happy Valley" Film With John Ziegler Commentary, Part 2
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 2 ธ.ค. 2014
- This is Part 2 of the actual movie "Happy Valley," "fair used" with commentary in the annotations from documentary filmmaker John Ziegler who runs the website www.FramingPaterno.com. Part 1 can be viewed at this link: • Actual Unedited "Happy... For more commentary and information on the film, go to: framingpaterno.com/huge-annive...
But Sue, Jim Clemente had NO impact on the Sandusky case regarding Jerry himself or your husband because he didn't interview anyone which means he clearly didn't study the case!
I can't believe they treated that old man with the sign like that. no matter what they shouldn't have been aggressive towards an elder, and honestly everything he said was the truth and wasn't anything outlandish or really even disrespectful, it was just the truth. its great to be loyal for me it is THE most important thing, but you have to be realistic and most certainly when it comes to hurting children. Joe Paterno could have been the real hero of the story and with the type of pull he had could have made anything happen. Its actually so disappointing that he didn't. he reported it, but how could he them even breath the same air as J.S. let alone allow him to continue any affiliation with the school. the artist did well.
Also yeah you shouldn't erase history.
Volume needs tuning... very interesting, part 1 was very touching. Thank You !!
Couldn't you have recorded this without a glaring reflection of your camera on the screen throughout the whole thing?? Lol
Some of the quips and challenges written in the box on the screen are absurd.
maybe clean your screen next time..
Looks like the screen has been sneezed on, eaten off, and generally NEVER cleaned - yeogh, just think of the germs on it !
This is a powerful documentary. The commentary running over it is oddly silent on the crux of the story.
Shubin is a colossal scumbag. @ 10:29 he's talking about "moral and ethical standpoint". If he had been hired as counsel for Curley, Shultz or Spanier he would laugh in the face of Freeh... Emails "thunderously demonstrate" ... WTF?
This movie just makes me angry.
i watched this vid so i could watch the doc for free but after sitting through the annotations i wish i had just bought it.
I love Matt's story of making the movie so the rest of the Sandusky family would face the truth. What is the truth Matt? That if just one of the foster kids, adopted kids or natural kids had said that Jerry rubbed up against them at prayer time at night that they too could have made millions of dollars??? The fact that none of them did is amazing and tells me all the truth I need to know.
Great film, but why did you post a pirated version? It was obviously shot off of an extremely dirty screen with a video camera on a tripod. Audio horrible. WTH?
How is paterno in the freeh report for covering up but mcqueary isn’t and he saw it happening
I'll say this, I'm from North Carolina, so I'm really indifferent when it comes to Penn State as a school and a football program, but Jesus, the white-haired guy holding up the sign at the Joe Paterno statue was being a total dick.... If he wanted to protest JoePa's legacy, then that's fine, he's entitled to his own opinion. However, that doesn't give him the right to invade people's personal space and family photographs. All he had to do in order to act like a respectable human being was move about six or seven feet to his left, and most rational people wouldn't have had a problem with him at all. But because he continued to be extremely rude and uncooperative with those who were trying to engage in an activity that they knew that they would probably never get an opportunity to do again, the police had to move him over to the spot where he should have been standing in the first place. Give people the freedom to CHOOSE to read what you wrote, not shove it inconsiderately in their faces
Mr. Ziegler, I don't give a hoot about football or Penn State. I chose to watch your commentary in order to watch this documentary. But you consistently assign motivations to the speakers, engage in name-calling and denigrate Sandusky's clearly underage victims with speculation. It appears to me you are guilty of the same practices you accuse many in the film of doing and that you have garnered many interviews regarding your specious victim-blaming in order to promote your "brand" and make money yourself. I find you to be a hypocrite and shameless self-promoter.
"Denial is healthy for me" - another COWARD
Welcome to CANCEL CULTURE