I’d been shooting wildlife with an R5 with the 100-500 and picked up an R7 for the crop factor. This is one impressive camera. I’ve barely touched my R5 since. Good ergo, great pixel density, improved af, similar low light performance and a path to an effective 800mm.
Thanks again Vanessa for this review of the R7. I purchased my R7 to pair as an extra body with my R6 (for portraits). However, I've used it only for Dog Show Events. I have to say, that I am totally impressed with the accuracy of focusing at the Dog Show Arena; they are fast moving subjects and having that extra reach is perfect. R7 paired with the RF 70-200 f2.8 lens is a game changer. I'll have to test it out for portraits too.
I've got mine and I LOVE IT!!!!!! Having a hard time deciding between the R and the R7 for when I want to go out and shoot! I guess I'll just have to take both!
I have both and both have its pros and cons at the end I still take both during events I just add more ISO for the r7 while using the on camera flash to compensate for the difference of the EOS r with the full frame sensor and at the end you can’t tell what camera shot what
The R7 is a very capable camera, use it with the RF 35mm 1.8 and my Canon R 24-70mm 2.8 at a sweet 16. At the end of the day you couldn't tell which camera shot what photo.
Great timing on this video! UPS just dropped my R7 off (which is my first camera in years), so I'm watching this as I unbox and start playing with the new camera! Love your videos, they're incredibly insightful and entertaining!
Hi Vanessa, it's interesting that you like the super high res sensor of the R7. In my hands on review video I tried it out with the RF18-150mm, third party Sigma lenses and of course EF glass. The results were very surprising!
Hi Vanessa. Thank you so much for this review of the R7. I just got my R7 and I am so excited. would you recommend the 85mm f2? I just got the 35mm 1.8 and the 16 you recommended on this video! thank you so much.
Good point. I actually haven’t tested it in low light so I try not to talk about specs in cameras I haven’t used on the job. I think the highest I’ve shot this camera is around 1600 and it was pretty clean, but obviously not as clean as the R3/R5 but better than an RP/ m50. Focus was good in lower light in general and dynamic range… I mean, pretty standard but I also shoot for highlights in general, shoot RAW or use flash if I’m trying to balance exposure so that’s not something I rely on the minutia of difference too much.
I second shoot 35 weddings per yr, still using 5DIV’s. Not liking Canon’s mirrorless offerings: sad 20mp R6 or $4k R5. The R7 seems like it would work for 2nd shooting weddings, what’s your opinion on pro use of the R7 and the crop factor? I always use on and off camera flash all day. Thanks!
@@steventurcios2477 the canon one is better but has a blue blush if you stop down which i do not do so that one, the viltrox one physically wobbles so dodgy for video but no blush stopped down
@@gerardferry3958 I've not seen a speedbooster for the R7. Got a link for one? I understand Canon fired off a cease and desist to Viltrox for their boosters.
Wow Absolutely Amazing clarity color and lighting balance!!: What camera, lens, lighting did you use to shoot this video’s in studio lecture with the shelving unit and blue background?
Trying to get a good art print camera that can also do well all around without expensive lenses for the all around stuff. Or should I just start off with full frame EOS R?
I have done pro work, on and off, on an 7D and 7D2 for years - weddings, portraits, news papers, commercial etc. The R7 is light years ahead of the 7D/7D2 so I'd say definitely. It's not going to be as sharp as the FF R series cameras but it's image quality is still very good. Apart from an EFs wide zoom I use FF EF/L lenses (and the RF 50mm 1.8) on it and the results are very good. Most clients will be very happy with the results. High ISO is where it tends to fall down. I use DxO RAW to fix that.
I brought an R7 recently to replace my 7D2 and I have to say that it's pretty good. For me the Eye Detect is a game changer - the camera snaps instantly onto the eye regardless of placement in the frame. It makes shooting portraits super quick and easy. I use mostly EF lenses on it. The 85mm 1.4L is particularly good on it. I also like the RF 50mm 1.8 - it's not as sharp 85mm 1.4. But it's size and light transmission makes it a very good lens for social situations in low light. The IBIS makes the 50mm 1.8 very usable in low light. Noise is not too crash hot at high ISO but I can completely tame it with DxO RAW. It will focus in very low light but I had to switch from Eye Detect to spot focus in extremely low light (1/6th, f1.4, 12800iso). I shoot the odd wedding and can't wait to shoot one with this. My insta, for anyone interested: instagram.com/tonygrantpix ...
I've given up on Canon now. I was expecting an 7D/7D mk II mirrorless. The same build, weather resistance, NORMAL button layout, and a battery grip. What, a disappointment.
I was a little disappointed in some aspects of the R7 when it was first announced but after having replace my 7D/7D2 with one I have to say that it's a great camera. The eye Detect and the IBIS are game changers, and the reason I brought it. Having an EVF will be great for shooting video too. And of course - a flip screen!
If a professional photographer uses a cell phone camera, is the professional status lost? It's all in the photographic eye in using any brand, model, or vintage camera. A professional photographer is one who gets paid for being a creator, regardless of the camera used. I will say post editing is a big plus for the eye appeal. All this said, the genre of photography will dictate the proper tools for picture taking. Sports action photographers reed a bigger tool box than product and photographers.
I tried two R7's. The first one was total crap. I am mostly a bird photographer & especially BIF. I never got an in-focus picture out of that first camera. I sent it back to B&H & they send another new one. This one was slightly better, but my keeper rate is less than 5%. My R5 has a keeper rate of over 90%. So you can imagine how dissatisfiedI was. I wanted the crop sensor for the extra reach. Again disappointment since the longer photos were the worst OOF pics. I always wait until the focus points found the bird, but the photo would still be OOF. The second R7 went back to B&H & I got my money back. I guess I will save up and get a second R5. I always want 2 bodies, & I want to go totally mirrorless. I had hoped the R7 would meet that, but another R5 will do the job.
Not questioning the RF line or the camera capabilities. They are amazing. For anyone going with RF APS-C, only affordable options are the non-l series primes. There is nothing from third party no semi pro lenses from canon. As of now, cannot start with Canon without breaking the bank. Background: I am a part time hybrid shooter/hobbyist. I own an R6, rf 24-105l, rf 70-200l and looking for affordable options for the next step up. Jumping the boat seems a better option.
@@VanessaJoy the rf lines good lenses are over 1500, competition ahs third party manufacturers for much better prices, sorry Vanessa, your work is amazing because : the gear matter! reliable, sharp, quality of images and because of your vision and talent
I’d been shooting wildlife with an R5 with the 100-500 and picked up an R7 for the crop factor. This is one impressive camera. I’ve barely touched my R5 since. Good ergo, great pixel density, improved af, similar low light performance and a path to an effective 800mm.
Nice!
Ordered my R7 and I'm looking forward to it. Thankyou for the great video. learnt alot. 👍👍
Thanks again Vanessa for this review of the R7. I purchased my R7 to pair as an extra body with my R6 (for portraits). However, I've used it only for Dog Show Events. I have to say, that I am totally impressed with the accuracy of focusing at the Dog Show Arena; they are fast moving subjects and having that extra reach is perfect. R7 paired with the RF 70-200 f2.8 lens is a game changer. I'll have to test it out for portraits too.
I'd imagine the crop factor is actually a nice thing for you too, since you're shooting further away :-)
R7 is a beast, you are the beauty😍
Absolutely true!
I've got mine and I LOVE IT!!!!!! Having a hard time deciding between the R and the R7 for when I want to go out and shoot! I guess I'll just have to take both!
Same!!!!!🙌🏾🙌🏾🙌🏾
Does R have fast focus
I have both and both have its pros and cons at the end I still take both during events I just add more ISO for the r7 while using the on camera flash to compensate for the difference of the EOS r with the full frame sensor and at the end you can’t tell what camera shot what
The R7 is a very capable camera, use it with the RF 35mm 1.8 and my Canon R 24-70mm 2.8 at a sweet 16. At the end of the day you couldn't tell which camera shot what photo.
Great timing on this video! UPS just dropped my R7 off (which is my first camera in years), so I'm watching this as I unbox and start playing with the new camera! Love your videos, they're incredibly insightful and entertaining!
Hi Vanessa, it's interesting that you like the super high res sensor of the R7. In my hands on review video I tried it out with the RF18-150mm, third party Sigma lenses and of course EF glass. The results were very surprising!
do you mean its good? I found an r7 with 18-150 for 1100 with 4yr warranty is that good? should i get it?
@@iancunicolae2626 have a look at my review on my channel and see if it's for you
I just found you from the video with Manny where ya'll used cheap gear. Super inspirational I'm glad to have found you!
Thanks so much for being here!
Hi Vanessa. Thank you so much for this review of the R7. I just got my R7 and I am so excited. would you recommend the 85mm f2? I just got the 35mm 1.8 and the 16 you recommended on this video! thank you so much.
Yup! Great lens at a great price. Here’s my review on it: th-cam.com/video/t7zfM5q1DK0/w-d-xo.html
Thank you so much Vanessa! Very helpful and informative review! Good lick!
I want to upgrade my Nikon camera & equipment. I like what the Canon R7 offers. I might make that switch over.
Nice!
Love this camera...focus engine is AMAZING.~! Better than all of my Sony bodies. yes in photo and video.
Most of this video consist of advertising and photo editing. I'd like to see eos R7 performance in low light, high iso, dynamic range.
Good point. I actually haven’t tested it in low light so I try not to talk about specs in cameras I haven’t used on the job. I think the highest I’ve shot this camera is around 1600 and it was pretty clean, but obviously not as clean as the R3/R5 but better than an RP/ m50. Focus was good in lower light in general and dynamic range… I mean, pretty standard but I also shoot for highlights in general, shoot RAW or use flash if I’m trying to balance exposure so that’s not something I rely on the minutia of difference too much.
I think you are missing the main use for this camera, wildlife and sport photography. Get the rf 100-500 and the rf 200-800 lens you are set.
Nice!
It looks like a great camera but you do know what EOS stands for right?
goddess of the dawn
@@VanessaJoy Yep Greek Goddess no wonder you use Canon!!!
I second shoot 35 weddings per yr, still using 5DIV’s. Not liking Canon’s mirrorless offerings: sad 20mp R6 or $4k R5. The R7 seems like it would work for 2nd shooting weddings, what’s your opinion on pro use of the R7 and the crop factor? I always use on and off camera flash all day. Thanks!
You’d prob like the R6 ii. I’m obsessed with it for weddings!
The R7 is a good backup camera for events but wouldn’t be my first choice
@@VanessaJoy
Thank you, appreciate your advice!
It has uses.: crop good for telephoto effect,. speedboosster good for night shots. f1 anyone? two slots and ibis costs buttons
What speed booster would you use for R7?
@@steventurcios2477 the canon one is better but has a blue blush if you stop down which i do not do so that one, the viltrox one physically wobbles so dodgy for video but no blush stopped down
@@gerardferry3958 I've not seen a speedbooster for the R7. Got a link for one? I understand Canon fired off a cease and desist to Viltrox for their boosters.
Wow Absolutely Amazing clarity color and lighting balance!!: What camera, lens, lighting did you use to shoot this video’s in studio lecture with the shelving unit and blue background?
look in the description - I have it all listed out for you! Nanlights and Canon R5 with RF 85mm 1.2 :-)
Yes I know the settings r just as important: do you remember and can also share what settings were used?
@@VanessaJoy ok yes I see it all there : super thank you!😊
Vanessa, I thought the R10 is the beginner camera and the R7 is the more advanced one. I never question the ambassador but...
I'll get to that in the r10 vs r7 comparison video I made :-) I have thoughts about the R10...
They are starting to ship body only shipments. Just got mine today
yay congrats! What are your thoughts on it?
Which is value for money r10 or r7
R7 imo
Would this camera be good for shooting pastel and acrylic paintings to sell prints of them?
Trying to get a good art print camera that can also do well all around without expensive lenses for the all around stuff. Or should I just start off with full frame EOS R?
I don’t see why not. How big are you planning on printing?
@@VanessaJoy she works with canvases that are 36x36 and under right now for the foreseeable future.
Question is this a pro camera for a budget
I think so 🤷🏻♀️
I have done pro work, on and off, on an 7D and 7D2 for years - weddings, portraits, news papers, commercial etc. The R7 is light years ahead of the 7D/7D2 so I'd say definitely. It's not going to be as sharp as the FF R series cameras but it's image quality is still very good. Apart from an EFs wide zoom I use FF EF/L lenses (and the RF 50mm 1.8) on it and the results are very good. Most clients will be very happy with the results. High ISO is where it tends to fall down. I use DxO RAW to fix that.
I brought an R7 recently to replace my 7D2 and I have to say that it's pretty good. For me the Eye Detect is a game changer - the camera snaps instantly onto the eye regardless of placement in the frame. It makes shooting portraits super quick and easy.
I use mostly EF lenses on it. The 85mm 1.4L is particularly good on it. I also like the RF 50mm 1.8 - it's not as sharp 85mm 1.4. But it's size and light transmission makes it a very good lens for social situations in low light. The IBIS makes the 50mm 1.8 very usable in low light.
Noise is not too crash hot at high ISO but I can completely tame it with DxO RAW. It will focus in very low light but I had to switch from Eye Detect to spot focus in extremely low light (1/6th, f1.4, 12800iso).
I shoot the odd wedding and can't wait to shoot one with this.
My insta, for anyone interested: instagram.com/tonygrantpix ...
For wedding photographer (photo session and shirt video clios) R7 it is good choice??
Hmmmm I don’t see why not - or the R6 if budget allows
@@VanessaJoy in lebanon r6 more expensive around 2500$ body only , do u think that R7 similar or better than 5d iv ?
For portrait photography RF 35mm 1.8 good for canon r7 ?
You’d have to stand pretty far away but it would be gorgeous
Looking good again.... The R7, i really want this camera, but its still out of stock here in europe....
Very informative. Will have to check out this Nikon camera.
😂
Lord the black dress... Great review also, thanks!
What 3rd Party lenses are/Will be available
Canon announced that there won’t be any third part lenses available for R mount.
Just the adapter to mount any EF as far as we know
Thanks for reviewing this!
I've given up on Canon now. I was expecting an 7D/7D mk II mirrorless. The same build, weather resistance, NORMAL button layout, and a battery grip. What, a disappointment.
I was a little disappointed in some aspects of the R7 when it was first announced but after having replace my 7D/7D2 with one I have to say that it's a great camera. The eye Detect and the IBIS are game changers, and the reason I brought it. Having an EVF will be great for shooting video too. And of course - a flip screen!
Yeah learning the different button layouts can be annoying for muscle memory for sure
If a professional photographer uses a cell phone camera, is the professional status lost? It's all in the photographic eye in using any brand, model, or vintage camera. A professional photographer is one who gets paid for being a creator, regardless of the camera used. I will say post editing is a big plus for the eye appeal. All this said, the genre of photography will dictate the proper tools for picture taking. Sports action photographers reed a bigger tool box than product and photographers.
quite true!
I tried two R7's. The first one was total crap. I am mostly a bird photographer & especially BIF. I never got an in-focus picture out of that first camera. I sent it back to B&H & they send another new one. This one was slightly better, but my keeper rate is less than 5%. My R5 has a keeper rate of over 90%. So you can imagine how dissatisfiedI was. I wanted the crop sensor for the extra reach. Again disappointment since the longer photos were the worst OOF pics. I always wait until the focus points found the bird, but the photo would still be OOF. The second R7 went back to B&H & I got my money back. I guess I will save up and get a second R5. I always want 2 bodies, & I want to go totally mirrorless. I had hoped the R7 would meet that, but another R5 will do the job.
Hmmmm, I definitely don’t have experience photographing birds with either of those cameras take your word for it ☺️
What lenses were you using? RF-S, full frame RF or adapted EF ?
Looks like a very capable camera for the price!
Wow maybe next month I'll try your presets when I recover after this purchase. You make it seem so easy!
😂
I love my R7 bought it within the first hour it was out.
it's a killer camera - esp for the price and being in the RF line of lenses
@@VanessaJoy Yup sold soany through my channel but Canon don't care about smaller channels. Great to see you doing great things with them.
Had my R7 for about 2 months and just love it. My hobby is commercial transport, trains, buses, canals and it’s fine for these subjects.
you are awesome -thanks for sharing everything!
You are so welcome! Thanks for watching!
Vanessa , Tell us about the EOS R6 II ! 🤫🤭🤫
Ok. That sounds like a job for Canon Rumors 😂
@@VanessaJoy 😭
$15k on the wedding. Nice! 👌🏻👌🏻👌🏻
Lol thx ☺️
I watched the video cause I was curious to see more of that smile of yours ❤️ . Lovely
Nice review
Thanks!
Don't let your math ability trouble you...Albert Einstein also had trouble with simple math...
😂
Vanessa you are gorgeous! ❤
Oh thank you!
Too bad being Canon ambassador you have to make this camera look good, poor ISO, lack of lenses...
Lack of lenses for sure.
Lack of lenses? 😂 the RF line is amazing
Not questioning the RF line or the camera capabilities. They are amazing. For anyone going with RF APS-C, only affordable options are the non-l series primes. There is nothing from third party no semi pro lenses from canon.
As of now, cannot start with Canon without breaking the bank.
Background:
I am a part time hybrid shooter/hobbyist.
I own an R6, rf 24-105l, rf 70-200l and looking for affordable options for the next step up. Jumping the boat seems a better option.
@@VanessaJoy the rf lines good lenses are over 1500, competition ahs third party manufacturers for much better prices, sorry Vanessa, your work is amazing because : the gear matter! reliable, sharp, quality of images and because of your vision and talent
You can fit EVERY EF & EFs lens on this thing as well as the RF lenses. That's a massive lens range!
What a cute photographer
aw thanks
Beautiful you are 😊💕📸
Thank you!! 😊
That black dress... wow
oh... you saw my secret thing :-)
But the link doesn’t work …….
🌷🌷🌷🌷🌷👍
You're a very good photografer and very beautiful woman.
E-os not e-oooosss
Actually, I asked Canon this. And they said eeeeos
@@VanessaJoy No they didn't.
@@jasonswift7098 That’s what they told me when I called them a few years ago while they were looking into up.
But hey, whatevs
@@spuddlefunk Its just Eos.