Very glad there is now public awareness that it is possible to harness nationalistic pride, in sheer hypocrisy, to deliberately harm a competitor or to use technology to terrorise an individual. That much need justice to clear his name is taking very long to surface but the tide is turning, slowly but surely. My heartfelt support for ZZH, ZZH's family and the amazing fans who have been banned for 180 days by WeiBo too.
Hace un año Zháng Zhe Han, era víctima de insultos vejaciones y toda clase de maldad, se ensañaron con un joven digno trabajador y honesto, afortunadamente se descubrió al verdadero culpable y Zháng Zhe Han, volvió a los escenarios para demostrar que es un ser humano talentoso , e inteligente, y que es capaz de superar cualquier adversidad. Gracias profesor Wan , por defender el estado de derecho de los ciudadanos de su nación.
To all those that tried to hurt and destroy the career of Zhangzhehan. Karma is coming for you. What is done in the Dark Will come to the Light! That young man was afraid to go out, his mum, family and friends we're being attacked and bullied with messages of hate. And yet all the evidence shows this was a deliberate attempt to take down Zhangzhe. As a fan I am thankful that his career has now gone from strength to strength. Another international no1 single and award winning documentary and sell out concert at home and abroad. Darkness can't drive out darkness only Light can do that Hate can not drive out hate only Love can do that! We are with you Zhangzhehan and we love you ❤️
Хотелось бы знать , как сейчас идут судебные дела у Чжэ , что-то хоть меняется в этой несправедливой стране , у меня пропало всякое уважение к этой госмашине .
Wang, Yong on 2022-02-21 Looking at the law system from Zhang Zhehan Incident (813 Incident) Source: China News-Law Supervision The second expert we have invited is: Professor of Law School of China University of Political Science and Law, Director of Hong Fan Institute of Law and Economics, and Professor Wang Yong. Welcome. Distinguished leaders and esteemed colleagues, good afternoon! My name is Wang Yong, professor at China University of Political Science and Law. The topic of my speech is regarding Zhang Zhehan’s 813 Incident and the rule of law. On August 13, 2021, an incident happened - August 13 Incident. Here is the brief case description of this incident. On August 13, hundreds of marketing accounts on Weibo and Wechat simultaneously posted photos of Actor Zhang Zhehan traveling in Japan in 2018. Photos of him in a cherry blossom park. Netizens’ opinion convicted him of worshipping the Yasukuni Shrine. I don't know this person Zhang Zhehan before December last year. I have never watched his TV dramas. Even now I cannot name a TV drama that Zhang Zhehan has appeared in. However, as a law professor, along with our fellow law professionals, we are all paying special attentions to this incident. We have studied this incident independently. We consider this incident a serious violation of the rule of law in the era of Internet. It is a residual atmosphere of the Cultural Revolution in the era of internet, which should deserve the highest attention in the law field. I will discuss this incident from three perspectives: factual issues, legal issues and political issues. Factual issues. During the 8-13 incident of Zhang Zhehan, netizens accused and convicted him of worshipping the Yasukuni Shrine. This establishes a case of slander and libel. Defamation has three characteristics. 1st is the traditional techniques. His photos in cherry blossom park were tampered with Photoshop to change the background to Yasukuni Shrine. 2nd, the higher class method - altering of the Baidu entries. Zhang Zhehan and Lady Dewi was photographed together, while they attended a friend's wedding. We know Lady Dewi is an old friend of China, wife of President Sukarno. However, one day before August 13, someone altered her Baidu entry. They switched the name of her late husband from President Sukarno to President Suharto. Suharto is the one responsible for mass massacre of Chinese-Indonesians. What a coincidence in the timing. The 3rd characteristics: over 800 marketing bots including WeChat accounts released this false news at the same exact time. Plus huge amount of robots and water armies commented on the relevant news reporting posts. Some of our official media outlets were not aware of the facts, perhaps because the operators were young and inexperienced staff members. So they reposted these info. And the public opinion quickly spiraled out of control. 4th characteristics: China’s Association of Performing Arts (CAPA) used false information and rumors on the internet, to enforce an Internet boycott of Zhang Zhehan, without following formal procedures. On August 15th, CAPA directly released the list of immoral artists, to enforce a industry-wide boycott against Zhang Zhehan. Such are the 4 main characteristics of this incident. Now what are the legal implications of this? First, when a citizen's reputation and personality rights are violated based on fabricated truths, under Civil Code, this is slander and defamation. This constitutes as defamation according to the civil law rules, and the people's court should file the case。 However, when Zhang Zhehan, as an ordinary citizen of People's Republic of China, filed a lawsuit for defamation or infringement of reputation, the People's Court refused the case. This goes against the Supreme People’s Court’s established case-filing registration system, which it repeatedly emphasized at the end of the year, that citizens' prosecutions cannot be refused. Complete contradictory - we don't know where the powers of this session of the People's Court come from? 2nd, which is somewhat pleasing to hear, that Zhang Zhehan reported his case again as "criminal defamation". The public security department has accepted it and is now waiting to file a case. The 3rd issue, a legal one, is about CAPA CAPA should have followed formal procedures when it listed Zhang Zhehan as an artist with bad behaviors. The association says it was through its ethics committee. But the member list of this ethics committee, its procedures, hearing procedures, are all missing. From 8-13 to 8-15, such a short period. Secondly, can an association punish some actors using words: "artists with bad behaviors"? In my opinion, the laws should forbid anybody from being insulted - It is a basic principle. Even criminals are spared of insults according to the law. They can be penalized, but not publicly shamed. How can an association have the power to take the 2 words "bad behaviors" from a 4-words idioms to label others? Terms in law must be technical, not to mention a word like "bad". The hidden meanings can be contradictory. Who are bad? People who "break laws" or "lose morality"？ Then Zhang Yimou who violated the National Family Planning policy to give birth to 3 children, and got fined for over 7 million Yuan - is he also an "artist of bad behaviors"? There are still more such cases. Who are bad? Who are not? CAPA is not a legislative body, but they still must abide by the basic principles of the law. This is the 2nd point. The 3rd point: CAPA is not an administrative agency. Yet their conjoined boycott are indeed administrative penalties. Enforcing the industry prohibition of administrative punishment, depriving citizen's labour rights stipulated in the constitution. But there is no guarantee of procedure The 4th issue involves the anti-monopoly law. Paragraph 5 of Article 13 of the Anti-Monopoly Law clearly states that: conjoined boycott is a behavior of monopoly. Under the organization of the association, the publication of such a list, and the call for a boycott, completely constitutes the violation of antitrust law under Paragraph 5 of Article 13. As an association, doesn't it have a political stance on the anti-monopoly law that the central government attaches great importance to? The 3rd issue is the political one. I'll bring up three points of views here. 1st, we should be at alert to the legacy of the Cultural Revolution in the Internet age This era of ours has a biggest characteristic, that is the artificial intelligence of the Internet. Capital. Capital controls the platform; capital has advantages; capital has the monopoly; Capital owns the algorithms. Under this situation, as the other speaker has mentioned, where is the news? Where is the truth? It's highly possible that everyone of us is currently inside a little dark room, while the real truth, real news are under the control of those technologies. The incident of Zhang Zhehan I mentioned earlier fully demonstrated this technical feature. This is the 1st point that we must be alerted to. Be alerted to the pitfalls of the Internet era. These technologies can completely ignore the laws. Can violate the basic rights of citizens. Can also use technologies to attack its competitors. 2nd point - we must beware of False Nationalism We Chinese all love our country. We all are hot blooded. This is our precious nationalism and patriotism. But nationalism and patriotism can be true or false. Some people utilize nationalism and patriotism to attack their competitors. They use nationalism to create public opinion terror, and persecute our own Chinese nationals Chinese persecute Chinese themselves - this is essentially an anti-nationalism, anti-patriotism. So we must be aware. 3rd point: we must insist on the rule of laws in this era. Law is the biggest political matter. The Party Central Committee has issued the resolution on the rule of law in 2014. The rule of law is a principle that the central government attaches great importance to. The rule of law is related to the basic rights of every citizen To put it into practice, that is, judicial review by judicial organs, judicial trials, and judicial filing of cases are the last barrier to protect the basic rights of citizens. We cannot use vague reasons, slogan reasons, or procrastination to reject a citizen's request for defense and protection of his rights, or a request for filing a case. If we can't even do this one thing, then our case registration system is nothing but a dead letter. If we can't even do this one thing, then how can we build a country ruled by law? So my topic today is the Zhang Zhehan Incident. The victim is the individual Zhang Zhehan himself. However, if the 3 issues are not resolved, the victim will not be limited to one person, Zhang Zhehan, but can be you, me, and others in the future. Everybody can become a victim. That's why in this era, it's more important for us to pay special attentions to the rule of law, to resolve social conflicts and ensure economic development and political stability. Therefore, I hope Zhang Zhehan Incident can arouse our great attention. Thank you.
![CAMPปลิ้น | รวม Highlight 2024! PART [1/2]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/6hnvNnvYloU/mqdefault.jpg)
那麼久了，何時能還他清白？
一個認真工作努力生活的年輕人就這樣被誣陷謾罵封殺禍及家人朋友，他能撐住沒自怨自艾，沒就此一蹶不振，反而自立自強拓展事業及市場到國際，真的是太令人佩服了
希望黑暗後的光明快點到來，還他一個公道跟正義
李學政老師講法護法，正義光明，卻被禁言！
王涌老師繼續補上，講法護法，分析張哲瀚被惡意綱暴事件，義正嚴辭！
懇請國家法政機構，坐言起行，擔當起立國威的角色，以法律懲治綱暴黑資方、黑公關，還綱絡空間文明，還受害人清譽！💪🏻💪🏻💪🏻💪🏻💪🏻
短短十一分钟，分析的已经很透彻了。虽然已经过去这么久了，还是很心疼小哲
好心疼小哲，張哲瀚是我心目中的英雄
致敬王涌教授！期待公平正义的到来！
期望更多正義之士為小哲發聲。🙏🙏🙏
+1
波特王也有做一篇
謝謝王涌教授！
演唱會第二篇章的＂抉擇＂，最為動情！
《無題》寫下江湖風雨江湖情。
《給電影人的情書》寫盡演藝界的辛酸與艱難。
《孤夢》道盡幾番風雨幾番情，
＂霎那之間人去樓空＂情難卻！
《不說》無言的不屈，濁世清流的冷靜。
《倔強》600多天的磨難，百鍊成金，走出困境渡己渡人，堅毅自救闖新天！
感謝冉以音樂，第二篇章的＂抉擇＂最為動情！
你我都是這塲陷害張哲瀚的見證者，凡有良知的都憤怒黑勢力惡競者龔俊一方所為！
幸好孤勇的張哲瀚沒有被打跨，從深淵中努力走出來自救，今天看見他自救的驕人成績引以為傲。
他生活的地方，黑勢力企圖要他滅口消失，他就倔強的堅持依法起訴，堅信真相一定會被法律認證，堅強用才智跨界創業！找到出口！
在網路上發生這種不可思議的事，官方竟然不查處竄改百度搜索結果的幕後黑手，反倒是將被冤枉的演員封殺.真是沒有公平正義可言!!!
小哲是個有才能的有智慧的演藝者,絕處逢生,此處不留人自有留人處,現今在國以再度重生發光發熱,得到廣大觀眾愛護,支持者日益增加,繼續努力,加油
说的透彻！分析到位！期待正义！
ขอบคุณผู้แบ่งปัญข้อมูลเราติดตามข่าวตลอดขอบคุณทุกท่านที่ให้ความสำคัญเกี่ยวกับสิทธิพลเมืองหรือประชาชนในประเทศชื่นชมค่ะ
非常感谢王教授为张哲瀚发声🙏🏻
恶竞如此恶毒，制造灾难。唯一庆幸是哲瀚活下来了，多亏他的坚强。苦难不值得歌颂，佩服哲瀚和不断为公正、真相奔走的义士、学者。错误不纠，我们不退。
很難得看到有勇氣說真話的專業法界人士。
沒想到在中國資本高過法律，不是社會主義人民正義至上的國家嗎？加油 ！不要讓黑手黨搞壞秩序！
所以我們海哲戰友夥伴路人，一定要用善來，處理事情，保護張哲瀚安全成功，也是一件好事海哲不離不棄哲瀚你也。認知幫你的人，不能放棄他們替你做的事，要永遠感恩世界的人。
Very glad there is now public awareness that it is possible to harness nationalistic pride, in sheer hypocrisy, to deliberately harm a competitor or to use technology to terrorise an individual.
That much need justice to clear his name is taking very long to surface but the tide is turning, slowly but surely.
My heartfelt support for ZZH, ZZH's family and the amazing fans who have been banned for 180 days by WeiBo too.
Hace un año Zháng Zhe Han, era víctima de insultos vejaciones y toda clase de maldad, se ensañaron con un joven digno trabajador y honesto, afortunadamente se descubrió al verdadero culpable y Zháng Zhe Han, volvió a los escenarios para demostrar que es un ser humano talentoso , e inteligente, y que es capaz de superar cualquier adversidad. Gracias profesor Wan , por defender el estado de derecho de los ciudadanos de su nación.
哭死了 我的小哲😭 还有没有天理啊
就有幕後黑手故意弄死他啊
I pray that Mr Li and his team will be able to help zhang zhehan case .
Waiting & waiting 😔
我还在
為何到現在都沒還他一個公道？
To all those that tried to hurt and destroy the career of Zhangzhehan. Karma is coming for you. What is done in the Dark Will come to the Light! That young man was afraid to go out, his mum, family and friends we're being attacked and bullied with messages of hate. And yet all the evidence shows this was a deliberate attempt to take down Zhangzhe. As a fan I am thankful that his career has now gone from strength to strength. Another international no1 single and award winning documentary and sell out concert at home and abroad.
Darkness can't drive out darkness only Light can do that
Hate can not drive out hate only Love can do that! We are with you Zhangzhehan and we love you ❤️
Please see directed by Zhang Zhehan for his journey to find inner peace through cycling to Lhasa in 2023.
又翻到王涌教授的这个视频，还是感慨，当事人还没获得清自，大众也没知晓真相
清白
這到底是怎樣的法治國家呢？連正義的李老師都被禁言，法律是欺負沒權勢的人嗎？也希望今天王潼老師的正義，不要也被禁言，不然張哲翰真的是可憐。
Хотелось бы знать , как сейчас идут судебные дела у Чжэ , что-то хоть меняется в этой несправедливой стране , у меня пропало всякое уважение к этой госмашине .
你好嗎哲瀚？北京歡迎你！法治進步需要你！
813你被網暴非法社死，莫明失去公民權利，讓我們看到同行惡競者的猙獰面目，天下竟有這幫惡魔藏身之地，嘆句無法無天！
否極泰來，倔強堅強的你從沒放棄自救，世界各地的歌迷粉絲、良知路人、正義聯盟一直支持你，用各種方法護你周全！我們積極等待晴天的到來。
得道多助，你的冤案一定會在公平公正的法律下得到審結，你的光明正大真相一定會得到法律的認證！這趟你到北京，祈盼法治進步，得到法律援助，撥亂反正！💪🏻💪🏻💪🏻
可惜啦 他回不来大陆发展了☹总感觉被陷害了吧 或者是拉他出来垫背的掩盖更大的娱乐事件
Wang, Yong on 2022-02-21 Looking at the law system from Zhang Zhehan Incident (813 Incident) Source: China News-Law Supervision
The second expert we have invited is: Professor of Law School of China University of Political Science and Law, Director of Hong Fan Institute of Law and Economics, and Professor Wang Yong. Welcome.
Distinguished leaders and esteemed colleagues, good afternoon! My name is Wang Yong, professor at China University of Political Science and Law.
The topic of my speech is regarding Zhang Zhehan’s 813 Incident and the rule of law.
On August 13, 2021, an incident happened - August 13 Incident.
Here is the brief case description of this incident.
On August 13, hundreds of marketing accounts on Weibo and Wechat simultaneously posted photos of Actor Zhang Zhehan traveling in Japan in 2018.
Photos of him in a cherry blossom park. Netizens’ opinion convicted him of worshipping the Yasukuni Shrine.
I don't know this person Zhang Zhehan before December last year. I have never watched his TV dramas.
Even now I cannot name a TV drama that Zhang Zhehan has appeared in.
However, as a law professor, along with our fellow law professionals, we are all paying special attentions to this incident.
We have studied this incident independently.
We consider this incident a serious violation of the rule of law in the era of Internet.
It is a residual atmosphere of the Cultural Revolution in the era of internet, which should deserve the highest attention in the law field.
I will discuss this incident from three perspectives: factual issues, legal issues and political issues.
Factual issues. During the 8-13 incident of Zhang Zhehan,
netizens accused and convicted him of worshipping the Yasukuni Shrine. This establishes a case of slander and libel.
Defamation has three characteristics. 1st is the traditional techniques.
His photos in cherry blossom park were tampered with Photoshop to change the background to Yasukuni Shrine.
2nd, the higher class method - altering of the Baidu entries.
Zhang Zhehan and Lady Dewi was photographed together, while they attended a friend's wedding.
We know Lady Dewi is an old friend of China, wife of President Sukarno.
However, one day before August 13, someone altered her Baidu entry.
They switched the name of her late husband from President Sukarno to President Suharto.
Suharto is the one responsible for mass massacre of Chinese-Indonesians.
What a coincidence in the timing.
The 3rd characteristics: over 800 marketing bots including WeChat accounts released this false news at the same exact time.
Plus huge amount of robots and water armies commented on the relevant news reporting posts.
Some of our official media outlets were not aware of the facts, perhaps because the operators were young and inexperienced staff members.
So they reposted these info. And the public opinion quickly spiraled out of control.
4th characteristics: China’s Association of Performing Arts (CAPA) used false information and rumors on the internet,
to enforce an Internet boycott of Zhang Zhehan, without following formal procedures.
On August 15th, CAPA directly released the list of immoral artists, to enforce a industry-wide boycott against Zhang Zhehan.
Such are the 4 main characteristics of this incident.
Now what are the legal implications of this?
First, when a citizen's reputation and personality rights are violated based on fabricated truths,
under Civil Code, this is slander and defamation.
This constitutes as defamation according to the civil law rules, and the people's court should file the case。
However, when Zhang Zhehan, as an ordinary citizen of People's Republic of China,
filed a lawsuit for defamation or infringement of reputation, the People's Court refused the case.
This goes against the Supreme People’s Court’s established case-filing registration system,
which it repeatedly emphasized at the end of the year, that citizens' prosecutions cannot be refused.
Complete contradictory - we don't know where the powers of this session of the People's Court come from?
2nd, which is somewhat pleasing to hear, that Zhang Zhehan reported his case again as "criminal defamation".
The public security department has accepted it and is now waiting to file a case.
The 3rd issue, a legal one, is about CAPA
CAPA should have followed formal procedures when it listed Zhang Zhehan as an artist with bad behaviors.
The association says it was through its ethics committee. But the member list of this ethics committee, its procedures, hearing procedures, are all missing.
From 8-13 to 8-15, such a short period.
Secondly, can an association punish some actors using words: "artists with bad behaviors"?
In my opinion, the laws should forbid anybody from being insulted - It is a basic principle.
Even criminals are spared of insults according to the law. They can be penalized, but not publicly shamed.
How can an association have the power to take the 2 words "bad behaviors" from a 4-words idioms to label others?
Terms in law must be technical, not to mention a word like "bad".
The hidden meanings can be contradictory. Who are bad? People who "break laws" or "lose morality"？
Then Zhang Yimou who violated the National Family Planning policy to give birth to 3 children, and got fined for over 7 million Yuan - is he also an "artist of bad behaviors"?
There are still more such cases. Who are bad? Who are not?
CAPA is not a legislative body, but they still must abide by the basic principles of the law.
This is the 2nd point. The 3rd point: CAPA is not an administrative agency.
Yet their conjoined boycott are indeed administrative penalties.
Enforcing the industry prohibition of administrative punishment, depriving citizen's labour rights stipulated in the constitution.
But there is no guarantee of procedure
The 4th issue involves the anti-monopoly law.
Paragraph 5 of Article 13 of the Anti-Monopoly Law clearly states that: conjoined boycott is a behavior of monopoly.
Under the organization of the association, the publication of such a list, and the call for a boycott, completely constitutes the violation of antitrust law under Paragraph 5 of Article 13.
As an association, doesn't it have a political stance on the anti-monopoly law that the central government attaches great importance to?
The 3rd issue is the political one.
I'll bring up three points of views here.
1st, we should be at alert to the legacy of the Cultural Revolution in the Internet age
This era of ours has a biggest characteristic, that is the artificial intelligence of the Internet.
Capital. Capital controls the platform; capital has advantages; capital has the monopoly;
Capital owns the algorithms.
Under this situation, as the other speaker has mentioned, where is the news? Where is the truth?
It's highly possible that everyone of us is currently inside a little dark room, while the real truth, real news are under the control of those technologies.
The incident of Zhang Zhehan I mentioned earlier fully demonstrated this technical feature.
This is the 1st point that we must be alerted to.
Be alerted to the pitfalls of the Internet era. These technologies can completely ignore the laws.
Can violate the basic rights of citizens. Can also use technologies to attack its competitors.
2nd point - we must beware of False Nationalism
We Chinese all love our country. We all are hot blooded.
This is our precious nationalism and patriotism. But nationalism and patriotism can be true or false.
Some people utilize nationalism and patriotism to attack their competitors.
They use nationalism to create public opinion terror, and persecute our own Chinese nationals
Chinese persecute Chinese themselves - this is essentially an anti-nationalism, anti-patriotism.
So we must be aware.
3rd point: we must insist on the rule of laws in this era.
Law is the biggest political matter.
The Party Central Committee has issued the resolution on the rule of law in 2014.
The rule of law is a principle that the central government attaches great importance to.
The rule of law is related to the basic rights of every citizen
To put it into practice, that is, judicial review by judicial organs, judicial trials, and judicial filing of cases are the last barrier to protect the basic rights of citizens.
We cannot use vague reasons, slogan reasons, or procrastination to reject a citizen's request for defense and protection of his rights, or a request for filing a case.
If we can't even do this one thing, then our case registration system is nothing but a dead letter.
If we can't even do this one thing, then how can we build a country ruled by law?
So my topic today is the Zhang Zhehan Incident. The victim is the individual Zhang Zhehan himself.
However, if the 3 issues are not resolved, the victim will not be limited to one person, Zhang Zhehan, but can be you, me, and others in the future.
Everybody can become a victim.
That's why in this era, it's more important for us to pay special attentions to the rule of law, to resolve social conflicts and ensure economic development and political stability.
Therefore, I hope Zhang Zhehan Incident can arouse our great attention. Thank you.
2024/8/31，三年后的八月最后一天
三年多了，还得不到合法公民权，对郭嘉彻底失望透了🤨
是否有文字版？我想转给亲戚朋友。
🔥🔥🔥《从张哲瀚事件看法治》🔥🔥🔥
在2021年8月13号，发生了一起“813事件”。这个事件的简要案情是这样的：在微博上数百个营销公号，微信公号同时发布了演员张哲瀚在2018年的一次的日本旅游，在樱花林拍的一张照片，舆论将其定罪为“参拜靖国神社”。
在去年12月之前，我都不知道张哲瀚这个人，我也从来没有看过他演的电视剧，我现在都说不出张哲瀚演了哪一部电视剧。但是作为一个法学教授，和我们法学同仁，对这一事件高度重视，我们对此进行了独立的研究，我们认为这个事件是网络时代一起严重的破坏法律制度的事件，是网络时代的“文革遗风”事件，应当引起法律界的高度的重视。
主要有三个问题：第一是事实问题；第二是法律问题；第三是政治问题。
事实问题
在张哲瀚的“813事件”当中网络定罪其“参拜靖国神社”。这是一起诽谤事件。
第一，是传统的技术。将张哲瀚在樱花林的照片通过技术的PS，将背景更换为靖国神社；
第二，是修改百度词条。张哲瀚和黛薇夫人在参加一个朋友的婚礼当中，与黛薇夫人有一张合影。大家知道黛薇夫人是中国的老朋友，苏加诺总统的夫人，但是在8月13号的前一天，有人将黛薇夫人的百度词条进行了修改，将黛薇夫人是苏加诺的夫人改为苏哈托的夫人，而苏哈托是屠杀华人的罪魁祸首，时间是如此的巧合；
第三，是舆论最终失控。是有八百多个营销公号、微信公号在同时发布了这个不实消息，还有大量的水军、机器人在相关的报道下面进行评论。我们有些官媒，不明真相，也可能是小编在那操作，转发相关的这些消息，舆论最终失控。
第四，中国演出行业协会未经正当程序的联合抵制。利用网络上的这些信息，没有经过正当程序，采纳了网络意见，在8月15号发布“劣迹艺人名单”，进行全行业对张哲瀚进行联合抵制。这就是这件事的四大特点。
法律问题
第一，涉及到一个公民的名誉、人格权受到侵犯，捏造事实，这就是《民法典》所规定的诽谤和侮辱。它构成民法上的诽谤的名誉侵权，人民法院应当立案。但是张哲瀚作为中华人民共和国的一个普通公民，在向人民法院提交诽谤名誉侵权的起诉状，我们的人民法院拒绝受理。这个和最高人民法院关于立案登记制，并且年底一再强调的不得拒绝公民的起诉是完全相悖的！我们不知道这些人民法院的权力是从何而来！
第二，比较让人欣慰的是张哲瀚提起了刑事诽谤主张，公安部门受理了，现在等待是否立案程序；
第三，关于中国演出业协会，中国演出业协会在将张哲瀚列为“劣迹艺人”，应当经过一个正当的程序。
1、协会说是通过一个道德委员会，但道德委员会的名单、程序、听证程序，一概都没有说。从8月13号到8月15号，时间相差极短。
2、一个协会在惩处一些演员的时候能不能用“劣迹艺人”这四个字？我认为，法律不侮辱他人这是一个基本原则，法律连犯罪分子都不能侮辱，只能是惩处，不能游街，不能示众。一个协会哪来的权力，能用一个成语上的“劣迹斑斑”的“劣迹”去定义他人，法律的词语应当具有禁止性，更何况“劣迹”这个词，内涵也很模糊。哪些人是“劣迹”？违法失德都是劣迹。那张艺谋当年违反计划生育生了三胎罚了七百多万，这是不是劣迹艺人呢？还有林林总总、诸如此类，哪些是“劣迹”的，哪些不是“劣迹的”呢？协会虽然不是立法机关，但是应当遵循法律的基本原则给与一个标准。
3、协会不是行政机关，但是他做出的这样的一种联合抵制，实际上是一种行政处罚，是行政处罚中的行业禁令，是对宪法上所规定的公民的劳动权的一种剥夺，但是在程序上没有任何保障。
4、涉及咱们的反垄断法第十三条的第5款，明确规定了联合抵制交易是一种垄断行为。在协会的组织下，所发布的这样一种名单，并且号召联合抵制完全构成了反垄断的第十三条第5款。作为一个协会，对于现在中央高度重视的反垄断法难道没有一点政治立场吗？
政治的问题
第一，要警惕网络时代的“文革遗风”。我们这个时代在技术上有一个非常大的特点，就是网络、人工智能、资本，资本控制平台、资本具有优势、资本具有垄断地位，资本拥有算法。在这种情况下，正如刚才张建伟老师所说的，新闻到底在哪里？真相到底在哪里？很可能我们每个人都被关在一个小黑屋里，而真正的事实、真相、新闻是被一个技术在操控，刚才我所讲到的张哲瀚事件的813，就完全展现了这样一种技术特点。这是我们要警惕的第一点，警惕网络时代的“文革遗风”。这些技术它们会完全不顾法治，侵犯公民的基本权利，并且用技术来打击竞争对手；
第二，一定要警惕虚假的民族主义。我们中国、中国人民都是爱自己的国家，都有一腔热血，这就是我们的珍贵的民族主义和爱国主义，但是民族主义和爱国主义也有真假之分。有一些人现在利用民族主义为了打击竞争对手打击他人，利用民族主义来制造舆论恐怖，来迫害中国人自己，中国人迫害中国人自己这本质上就是一种反民族主义，反爱国主义，所以我们一定要警惕。
第三，一定要坚持法治原则，法治是最大的政治。党中央在2014年就发布了依法治国的决议，法治是中央高度重视的一个原则，法治关系着每一个公民的基本权利。落实到实处，就是司法机关的司法审查、司法审判、司法立案是保障公民权利的最后一道屏障，我们不能以模糊的理由、拖沓的做法来拒绝一个公民为自己权利的申辩和保护的诉讼请求、立案的请求。如果连这一点都做不到，那么我们的立案登记制岂不是一纸空文，如果连这一点也做不到，我们的法治国又如何建立起来？
今天主题是张哲瀚事件，受害人是张哲瀚个人，但是刚才讲的三个问题不解决的话，在今后受害人就不仅仅是张哲瀚这一个人，可能是你、我、他，每一个人都可能成为受害人，所以在这个时代我们更重要的要高度重视法治，以法治来解决社会利益的冲突保障经济的发展和政治的稳定。
这个视频有英文字幕：th-cam.com/video/baoskGTLhP8/w-d-xo.html
@@zhehanzhangforeverblossom 非常感谢！
@@zhehanzhangforeverblossom謝謝你寫的很好
幕后黑手到底是谁？
工骏
是山河令同框的龚俊恶魔，背后捅刀，偷小哲童年照，想置他于死地取代小哲
【二月二正能量】
二月初二，龙抬头:
一抬头，丰收在望好兆头；
二抬头，福禄寿喜全都有；
三抬头，烦恼霉运全溜走；
四抬头，成功事业攥你手；
五抬头，步步顺达争上游抬头，幸福健康到永久。
今天是龙抬头日，祝你一年好运从头到尾。
[合十][合十][合十][玫瑰][玫瑰][玫瑰]
吉祥美好的二月二从抬头微笑祈福纳祥转运开始
[微笑][微笑][微笑][调皮][调皮][调皮]
昨日看到大學學術殿堂，教受以813張哲瀚案為主要研討單元，一個社會人民案件，引起學術研究討論，代表此案件，有著法律對人民保護不全。
813案乃牆外一般人都認為，天大笑話。怎有可能幾張旅遊照，會讓一位旅遊者，受到無情網暴。
一位還高唱「紅船」愛國歌者，一夕之間消失掌聲中。
簡直五雷轟頂，讓張哲瀚與海哲們連閃躲一秒都沒有。
牆外很多媒體開始對牆內黑水獄軍、媒體、個播主、小粉轟不可思意行為，感到震驚。紛紛批判著，這是網路亂殺的行為「惡質網暴」，對被暴者無情傷害，這些無知沒良者，不只是；犯罪行為，也有損害賠償法律責任，將會到來。
這些；亂寫，無知腦殘者，認為被傷者是公眾人物，有最高道德標准，傷他是正義化身。
公眾人物雖有被認定「道德標準
」，但是；最高道德標準，卻是有最基本人權「生命財產」生存權，乃不可毀之。
這些網暴者已深深傷害813受害者張哲瀚，「生存權」最大為害。
這次學術網暴討論，渴望牆內一定要修改，網暴法律程序與罪罰。
張哲瀚好好走出陰霾，面對法律之路，就當一齣實境演出法律劇。
目前只有劇名，劇情主軸，主角是他，各種角色未定，內容變化會高潮迭起，海哲們要参與當群眾演員。
此劇2021年8月13日開播......讓世界各角落觀眾繼續看下去。