Osman ghazi was an actually big sultan. But because he was the first, people dont know about him so much. He was so clever and the founder, who set the basis strategy for the Ottomans, which is "Conquer through Constantinople and Europe". The ottomans followed this "doctrin" in all their lifetime. He was a great leader for both Turks, Muslims and humanity, he was merciful. RIP
Spell portion of the implication insinuated is the Mongolian invasion of Quuarezria indirectly seated the Ottoman Empire albeit with many intervening footsteps branching histories in the Multiverse sense.
“The American missionary Eli Smith and G. H. O. Dwight, who traveled through turkey at the beginning of the nineteenth century observed that the turkomans were generally called Turks by the Ottomans, who abhorred the name Turk and preferred to be called Musalmans (Muslims). To the Ottomans, “turk” was a name that belonged to the people of Turkestan and the nomadic hordes who roamed the steppes of khurrusan. They considered themselves civilized Ottomans, and could not understand why Europeans called them Turks. As a sophisticated ruling class, the Ottomans looked down upon the Turkish peasantry, calling them esek Turk (Donkey Turk), and kaba turk (stupid turk). Expressions like “turk-head” and “turk-person” were contemptuously used by ottomans when they wanted to denigrate each other.”
“the Turkic identity of the empire rapidly dropped off. By the sixteenth century "Turk" was more a term of abuse than one of approbation. "In the Imperial society of the Ottomans," says Bernard Lewis, "the ethnic term Turk was little used, and then chiefly in a rather derogatory sense, to designate the Turcoman nomads or, later, the ignorant and uncouth Turkish-speaking peasants of the Anatolian villages. To apply it to an Ottoman gentleman of Constantinople would have been an insult" (Lewis 1968: 1-2; see also 332-33).8 To be a "Turk" or "Turkish" was, to the educated inhabitants of the empire, to be "ignorant," "witless," "senseless," "stupid," or "dishonest." Turks were called "country bumpkins" and "mischief-makers"; they could also be deviants and heretics, such as those who rallied to the Safavid Shah Ismail in the sixteenth century, or those who rebelled against the central government in the seventeenth century (Imber 2002: 3; Finkel 2007: 548). In the face of this history of disparagement and ridicule it is not surprising that the Turkish nationalist Ziya Gökalp should exclaim that "the poor Turks inherited from the Ottoman Empire nothing but a broken sword and an old-fashioned plow" (quoted Armstrong 1976: 397). This is by no means the only case, as we shall see, when the ostensible "imperial people"-in this case the Turks -feel that they got a raw deal out of "their" empire. Not only were Ottomans not Turks; "Turk" and "Turkish" were themselves vague and shifting designations. There was no sense of nationhood among the backwoods peasants of Anatolia who were usually referred to as Turks. Their affiliations were to their village or clan, or to the wider community of Islam”
bro, there are thousands of sources and evidences, which proves that ottomans kept their turkish identity. Beginning from the most simple one, they f.ex. continued to speak turkish in the palace, unlike the seljuks and some other big turkic empires. Another small but important proof could be that they used to attach bird feathers to their caps, a tradition they inherited from the older turkic states. Another could be, that they, besides the turkish language, also continued to use many of turkic traditions, which takes long time to write here. Do you want more proofs? It seems like your source are not reliable so much..
His sources western BS look who he is quoting jokers. European history is written to suit their own agenda proven lies deception. WE ARE TURKS & WE KNOW WHO WE ARE, THE OTTOMANS MY ANCESTORS
Some historians believe that malhun was the first wife and a bey kizi while others say that she was the daughter of Sheikh edibali and some also say that malhun and Bala are the same person and She was sheikh edibali’s daughter named Rabia Bala Mal hatun
Ottoman's Best Sultans: Ertugral Gazi- prepared the Oak's Soil Osman Gazi- planted the Oak Seed Orhan Gazi- Watered/ Nourished the Oak tree Well Sultan Murad 2nd - Rooted/Matured the Oak Tree Fully Mehmed 2nd : Unleashed The Oak's might/Shade to Istanbul and Beyond Selim 1st: Extended the Oak's might/shade to Asia and Arabia ( Caliphate) Sulieman Kanuni: Ruled and Regulated the mighty Oak Empire at its Finest with islamic Laws Notable Mention: Mehmet 1st- Saved the Oak tree from internal Worms and Fungus. NB: The Oak Tree is the Ottoman Empire
Türklerin atası Osman bey değildir.Türklerin atası kayıtlı ilk tarihe göre Milattan önce 2500 Oğuz , Teoman , Metehandır.Kayıt dışı olarak da Nuh Peygamberin oğlu Yafesten geldiğine inanılır…O da Milattan önce 4500 dür
“The American missionary Eli Smith and G. H. O. Dwight, who traveled through turkey at the beginning of the nineteenth century observed that the turkomans were generally called Turks by the Ottomans, who abhorred the name Turk and preferred to be called Musalmans (Muslims). To the Ottomans, “turk” was a name that belonged to the people of Turkestan and the nomadic hordes who roamed the steppes of khurrusan. They considered themselves civilized Ottomans, and could not understand why Europeans called them Turks. As a sophisticated ruling class, the Ottomans looked down upon the Turkish peasantry, calling them esek Turk (Donkey Turk), and kaba turk (stupid turk). Expressions like “turk-head” and “turk-person” were contemptuously used by ottomans when they wanted to denigrate each other.”
“the Turkic identity of the empire rapidly dropped off. By the sixteenth century "Turk" was more a term of abuse than one of approbation. "In the Imperial society of the Ottomans," says Bernard Lewis, "the ethnic term Turk was little used, and then chiefly in a rather derogatory sense, to designate the Turcoman nomads or, later, the ignorant and uncouth Turkish-speaking peasants of the Anatolian villages. To apply it to an Ottoman gentleman of Constantinople would have been an insult" (Lewis 1968: 1-2; see also 332-33).8 To be a "Turk" or "Turkish" was, to the educated inhabitants of the empire, to be "ignorant," "witless," "senseless," "stupid," or "dishonest." Turks were called "country bumpkins" and "mischief-makers"; they could also be deviants and heretics, such as those who rallied to the Safavid Shah Ismail in the sixteenth century, or those who rebelled against the central government in the seventeenth century (Imber 2002: 3; Finkel 2007: 548). In the face of this history of disparagement and ridicule it is not surprising that the Turkish nationalist Ziya Gökalp should exclaim that "the poor Turks inherited from the Ottoman Empire nothing but a broken sword and an old-fashioned plow" (quoted Armstrong 1976: 397). This is by no means the only case, as we shall see, when the ostensible "imperial people"-in this case the Turks -feel that they got a raw deal out of "their" empire. Not only were Ottomans not Turks; "Turk" and "Turkish" were themselves vague and shifting designations. There was no sense of nationhood among the backwoods peasants of Anatolia who were usually referred to as Turks. Their affiliations were to their village or clan, or to the wider community of Islam”
Sizin bildiğiniz her şey yanlış.Osmanoğlu olarak yazıyorum ; Biz Türküz ve Türklük şeref , Namus , savaşçı , adil , Nazik , Heybetli , Sanatçı , Akıllı , Çevik ve güçsüze dosttur.Biz Oğuz boyunun Kayı kolundan geliyoruz.Ve biz gibi 14 kol daha vardır…Hepsi Türk’tür ve akın akın şimşek gibi yağarız.Osmanoğulları olarak Türklüğümüzü hiç bir zaman inkar etmedik…Bunu inkar etmek bizi işte o zaman düşük gösterir…Türklük Allah’ın bize vermiş olduğu yüce bir kimliktir.Tarihi sizin tarihinizden daha çok zaferlerle dolu bir ırktan bahsederken kelimelerinize dikkat edin…
@@Kurdish20226 you are spamming the same message. So i do also: " bro, there are thousands of sources and evidences, which proves that ottomans kept their turkish identity. Beginning from the most simple one, they f.ex. continued to speak turkish in the palace, unlike the seljuks and some other big turkic empires. Another small but important proof could be that they used to attach bird feathers to their caps, a tradition they inherited from the older turkic states. Another could be, that they, besides the turkish language, also continued to use many of turkic traditions, which takes long time to write here. Do you want more proofs? It seems like your source are not reliable so much.."
“We do not conquer the lands, we conquer the hearts.”
- Mehmed II
Sure..
Osman ghazi was an actually big sultan. But because he was the first, people dont know about him so much. He was so clever and the founder, who set the basis strategy for the Ottomans, which is "Conquer through Constantinople and Europe". The ottomans followed this "doctrin" in all their lifetime. He was a great leader for both Turks, Muslims and humanity, he was merciful. RIP
Perhaps merciful is just a tad bit of exaggeration. The altruism aspect may have been Paul Bunyanized.
historic battles is the greatest
GREAT VIDEO, 👍
I wish for this series to couniue and see great series for this interesting history
Nice video❤🎉
Masha Allah
Thanks brother
For this 🎉
Found ur youtube channel today. Keep going Algorithm is kicking in.
Thank you for this early Turkish History ❤❤❤
Brother dont give up , we are waiting for your next video ❤ keep it up beother ❤🎉
Underrated bro 💖💖
nice vid
They say Atatürk is the father of Turks but I believe Osman Gazi is the father of Turks(in my opinion)
Ataturk it’s father of modern Turks
@@blancac6620he’s a traitor to the Turks he was a big contributor to the fall of the Ottoman Empire
Attaturk was a spawn of devil, who destroyed the Islamic spirit of this country, under the influence of West
Yeah this true, Osman gazi is the real father of turks
Atarturk was the father of stray path turk, but Ertugrul, Osman were the father of true Muslim turk
Like how this could be apart of the mongol mix as well
The great ottoman empire
Are you going to upload the hext video to about orhan and then his son and then his son ?
He hearted, it seems like a yes😅
make pt2 pt 3 etc
Yes, will be WAITING..
Next year
Spell portion of the implication insinuated is the Mongolian invasion of Quuarezria indirectly seated the Ottoman Empire albeit with many intervening footsteps branching histories in the Multiverse sense.
“The American missionary Eli Smith and G. H. O. Dwight, who traveled through turkey at the beginning of the nineteenth century observed that the turkomans were generally called Turks by the Ottomans, who abhorred the name Turk and preferred to be called Musalmans (Muslims). To the Ottomans, “turk” was a name that belonged to the people of Turkestan and the nomadic hordes who roamed the steppes of khurrusan. They considered themselves civilized Ottomans, and could not understand why Europeans called them Turks. As a sophisticated ruling class, the Ottomans looked down upon the Turkish peasantry, calling them esek Turk (Donkey Turk), and kaba turk (stupid turk). Expressions like “turk-head” and “turk-person” were contemptuously used by ottomans when they wanted to denigrate each other.”
“the Turkic identity of the empire rapidly dropped off. By the sixteenth century
"Turk" was more a term of abuse than one of approbation. "In the Imperial society of the Ottomans," says Bernard Lewis, "the ethnic term Turk was little used, and then chiefly in a rather derogatory sense, to designate the Turcoman nomads or, later, the ignorant and uncouth Turkish-speaking peasants of the Anatolian villages. To apply it to an Ottoman gentleman of Constantinople would have been an insult" (Lewis 1968: 1-2; see also 332-33).8 To be a "Turk" or "Turkish" was, to the educated inhabitants of the empire, to be "ignorant," "witless," "senseless," "stupid," or "dishonest." Turks were called "country bumpkins" and "mischief-makers"; they could also be deviants and heretics, such as those who rallied to the Safavid Shah Ismail in the sixteenth century, or those who rebelled against the central government in the seventeenth century (Imber 2002: 3; Finkel 2007: 548). In the face of this history of disparagement and ridicule it is not surprising that the Turkish nationalist Ziya Gökalp should exclaim that "the poor Turks inherited from the Ottoman Empire nothing but a broken sword and an old-fashioned plow" (quoted Armstrong 1976: 397). This is by no means the only case, as we shall see, when the ostensible "imperial people"-in this case the Turks -feel that they got a raw deal out of "their" empire.
Not only were Ottomans not Turks; "Turk" and "Turkish" were themselves vague and shifting designations. There was no sense of nationhood among the backwoods peasants of Anatolia who were usually referred to as Turks. Their affiliations were to their village or clan, or to the wider community of Islam”
bro, there are thousands of sources and evidences, which proves that ottomans kept their turkish identity. Beginning from the most simple one, they f.ex. continued to speak turkish in the palace, unlike the seljuks and some other big turkic empires. Another small but important proof could be that they used to attach bird feathers to their caps, a tradition they inherited from the older turkic states. Another could be, that they, besides the turkish language, also continued to use many of turkic traditions, which takes long time to write here. Do you want more proofs? It seems like your source are not reliable so much..
His sources western BS look who he is quoting jokers. European history is written to suit their own agenda proven lies deception. WE ARE TURKS & WE KNOW WHO WE ARE, THE OTTOMANS MY ANCESTORS
Excelente vídeo. A história do Império Otomano com Ertugrul Osman são sensacionais.
Sheikh edibali daughter is Bala hatun not Malhun hatun and his first wife was Bala hatun ❤
There are different names in different sources, i think the channel preferred one of them
osman bey ki life history dekhny ky liyy mera channel visit karyn urdu ma maps per @lesson Of History On Map
We don't know for sure
stop believing those turkish dramas
Some historians believe that malhun was the first wife and a bey kizi while others say that she was the daughter of Sheikh edibali and some also say that malhun and Bala are the same person and She was sheikh edibali’s daughter named Rabia Bala Mal hatun
subtitelnya dibenerin dong
Ottoman's Best Sultans:
Ertugral Gazi- prepared the Oak's Soil
Osman Gazi- planted the Oak Seed
Orhan Gazi- Watered/ Nourished the Oak tree Well
Sultan Murad 2nd - Rooted/Matured the Oak Tree Fully
Mehmed 2nd : Unleashed The Oak's might/Shade to Istanbul and Beyond
Selim 1st: Extended the Oak's might/shade to Asia and Arabia ( Caliphate)
Sulieman Kanuni: Ruled and Regulated the mighty Oak Empire at its Finest with islamic Laws
Notable Mention: Mehmet 1st- Saved the Oak tree from internal Worms and Fungus.
NB: The Oak Tree is the Ottoman Empire
Seslendirme güzel ama haritadaki yazılar Türkçe İngilizce olması gerek.
🙏🙏
His wife was Bala not malu
Bro, why are you stealing content
This is harp tahiri’s second channel.
He doesn't steal content? What do you mean?
Plzz add malayalam sub
Please add subs 😢
🤩🤩
👍👌
🎉🎉
Ana kanala video gelsin.
Türklerin atası Osman bey değildir.Türklerin atası kayıtlı ilk tarihe göre Milattan önce 2500 Oğuz , Teoman , Metehandır.Kayıt dışı olarak da Nuh Peygamberin oğlu Yafesten geldiğine inanılır…O da Milattan önce 4500 dür
Kimse atası demiyor ki zaten😅
Instead of pronouncing Usmaan you keep saying Os man😅
Father of Turks
OSMAN GAZI FATHER OF THE TURKS 🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷
Fuck you and your father subhuman only father that we have is ATARURK.
“The American missionary Eli Smith and G. H. O. Dwight, who traveled through turkey at the beginning of the nineteenth century observed that the turkomans were generally called Turks by the Ottomans, who abhorred the name Turk and preferred to be called Musalmans (Muslims). To the Ottomans, “turk” was a name that belonged to the people of Turkestan and the nomadic hordes who roamed the steppes of khurrusan. They considered themselves civilized Ottomans, and could not understand why Europeans called them Turks. As a sophisticated ruling class, the Ottomans looked down upon the Turkish peasantry, calling them esek Turk (Donkey Turk), and kaba turk (stupid turk). Expressions like “turk-head” and “turk-person” were contemptuously used by ottomans when they wanted to denigrate each other.”
“the Turkic identity of the empire rapidly dropped off. By the sixteenth century
"Turk" was more a term of abuse than one of approbation. "In the Imperial society of the Ottomans," says Bernard Lewis, "the ethnic term Turk was little used, and then chiefly in a rather derogatory sense, to designate the Turcoman nomads or, later, the ignorant and uncouth Turkish-speaking peasants of the Anatolian villages. To apply it to an Ottoman gentleman of Constantinople would have been an insult" (Lewis 1968: 1-2; see also 332-33).8 To be a "Turk" or "Turkish" was, to the educated inhabitants of the empire, to be "ignorant," "witless," "senseless," "stupid," or "dishonest." Turks were called "country bumpkins" and "mischief-makers"; they could also be deviants and heretics, such as those who rallied to the Safavid Shah Ismail in the sixteenth century, or those who rebelled against the central government in the seventeenth century (Imber 2002: 3; Finkel 2007: 548). In the face of this history of disparagement and ridicule it is not surprising that the Turkish nationalist Ziya Gökalp should exclaim that "the poor Turks inherited from the Ottoman Empire nothing but a broken sword and an old-fashioned plow" (quoted Armstrong 1976: 397). This is by no means the only case, as we shall see, when the ostensible "imperial people"-in this case the Turks -feel that they got a raw deal out of "their" empire.
Not only were Ottomans not Turks; "Turk" and "Turkish" were themselves vague and shifting designations. There was no sense of nationhood among the backwoods peasants of Anatolia who were usually referred to as Turks. Their affiliations were to their village or clan, or to the wider community of Islam”
Sizin bildiğiniz her şey yanlış.Osmanoğlu olarak yazıyorum ; Biz Türküz ve Türklük şeref , Namus , savaşçı , adil , Nazik , Heybetli , Sanatçı , Akıllı , Çevik ve güçsüze dosttur.Biz Oğuz boyunun Kayı kolundan geliyoruz.Ve biz gibi 14 kol daha vardır…Hepsi Türk’tür ve akın akın şimşek gibi yağarız.Osmanoğulları olarak Türklüğümüzü hiç bir zaman inkar etmedik…Bunu inkar etmek bizi işte o zaman düşük gösterir…Türklük Allah’ın bize vermiş olduğu yüce bir kimliktir.Tarihi sizin tarihinizden daha çok zaferlerle dolu bir ırktan bahsederken kelimelerinize dikkat edin…
@@Kurdish20226 you are spamming the same message. So i do also: " bro, there are thousands of sources and evidences, which proves that ottomans kept their turkish identity. Beginning from the most simple one, they f.ex. continued to speak turkish in the palace, unlike the seljuks and some other big turkic empires. Another small but important proof could be that they used to attach bird feathers to their caps, a tradition they inherited from the older turkic states. Another could be, that they, besides the turkish language, also continued to use many of turkic traditions, which takes long time to write here. Do you want more proofs? It seems like your source are not reliable so much.."
What greec😅is it not Greec is byzantine.
He didn’t “ build “ it , he started it
He founded Ottomans as state
@ the next 10 rulers during their time made the empire strong reaching its peak
Muhydeen Bin Arabi was a heretical figure
Lan harp tarihi