Hope yall like. I found that the audio in this video was a little jumpy and could've sounded better, and so I'll be getting a new, better mic to use starting with my next video. Be sure to frolick and otherwise gather resources for my return! Looking to upload the next video sooner than this one; a much shorter gap than the time between this and my whitelib video.
A good place to start combating police corruption and something that is never brought up because the power they hold r the police Union’s. They r the driving force behind police misconduct and corruption thru the protection they provide to their members. 1 big problem these unions create is the fact that there is no separation between those who r 2 follow orders the low ranking street cop from those who give the orders the higher ranking cops who r 2 hold those below him/her responsible when they mess up. They r all brothers and sisters of the Union and r taught to keep any problems among union members only. In the corporate world there is a separation between union/ labor who best interests r those of the union members and management who best interests r those of the corporation / share holders. If a business were to be ran the way police departments r they would fail but police departments r funded by the city who is funded by the tax payer. Since this the case the more the police department fails it’s city the higher the crime and the higher the funding is for the department. Its not in the best interests of the police to do a good job it’s in there best interest to fail.
I don't know if we can say that Huell was "clearly" guilty of assault, ESPECIALLY under the presented conditions. His actions could be seen as attempting to defend his employer from a heckler. And more importantly, the prosecution's side was completely fabricated, as Huell definitely didn't recognize the man or intend to hurt him significantly at all. But since no one cared to listen to that fact, it was either get Huell off, or let him take a punishment he obviously didn't deserve that was based on false information.
I see what you mean, but I'd disagree. Huell walked right up to two dudes in an argument and knocked one of them upside the head, sending him to the ground. There was no indication that jimmysaul was in any danger; the cop wasn't threatening to use force, wasn't brandishing a weapon, wasn't approaching him threateningly. An argument isn't reason to hit somebody across the head, especially when you know nothing about the argument itself or its context. You're right that he didn't hurt him significantly, which would fall under the legal definition of battery. But assault is much more lax, and only requires an attempt to use force, which he 100% exhibited. Huell is pretty sick so I'm not complaining lol but even if the cop didn't pull the 'he recognized me' card, Huell was done until Kim stepped in in my opinion.
@@diamondbrook yeah I have no problem with Huell getting a punishment, it just frustrates me to see lawyers conflating it to a much bigger issue than it really was and having no room for discussion on it, like they don't really care what the truth is. Although I guess a jury would probably think Huell had a vendetta on the cop too, I guess I just empathize with Huell since I know the story. Damn can he swing some sandwiches though
@@diamondbrook but there’s also a point to make bout how huell thought that was the action to take so intuitively no? There’s people you can just punch and there’s people you can’t, and that in itself is unjust. Reforming people like Huell is important, but reforming a system that protects some and takes no efforts whatsoever to protect others, to the point where people don’t think twice before punching someone is in itself an interesting point the show is making, imo.
It chaps my ass that assaulting an off duty plain clothes cop is assaulting an officer. Yes, it was assault. But he had no way of knowing the guy was an officer. The prosecution probably would have lost at trial
A very succint summary. The lying, cheating, scumbag whom only cares about money gets the lighter sentence, whereas the man who takes responsibility for his crimes gets the longer sentence.
One thing that is different about Jimmy, as opposed to many of the other law breakers on this show, is Jimmy tends to con when another injustice happens, something the law should be accounting for, but doesn't. Sandpiper is a good case, they were actively obstructing justice, so he felt he had to con to have justice served. Another example of Jimmy recognizing this was falling on the sword, after his greed turned Irene's friends against her. Because there was an injustice served there, Jimmy felt the need to con his way back to where he felt life was fair again, or at least set things back a little bit. In that regard, I think Jimmy has the most complex idea of what justice and law is. One of his greatest lines in the show is telling Bill Oakley "Yes it was!" to the comment "That wasn't a crime" about Jimmy getting Chuck's insurance rates raised. No one in that court room can even process the problem here, but for Jimmy it's arguably worse than actually breaking the law.... cause it is. Sure, he followed the law, but he was able to hurt someone that way too, arguably worse than any law breaker could have.
"No one in that court room can even process the problem here" that is a massive reach. Bill Oakley was asking because he's Saul's damn lawyer, that doesn't mean none of the humans in the courtroom are able to discern the fact that pushing a close sibling to commit suicide is a bad thing 💀
What a well-thought-out analysis. My favourite aspect of Better Call Saul are the different interesting characters which represent different degrees of being lawful or criminal and the resulting interactions of these characters meeting each other. Connecting these traits to more general problems with the system of law and examples of failures of the law in real life is simply amazing.
Nice analysis man, congrats. The only thing I think that was missed was in the analysis of Kim - she didn’t allow darkness to take hold only for her own vendetta against Howard, I think she was also motivated by her passion for Jimmy - she wanted to appease Saul, the person she thought Jimmy was becoming & thus these two dogfighters spiralled above a cloudline where they met a crimson sun.
Amazing video! BCS is my favorite show not only for it's stellar story and characters but because it also teaches viewers a very valuable lesson: that legality is not a guide for morality. The Justice system does have some good individuals within it, people just like Howard Hamlin, but the system as a whole is morally bankrupt. Love this video especially when comparing Mike's past as a dirty cop to real world parallels like the Chicago PD. 12:06 this editing was fantastic too.
Incredibly well said. Every layer of this show is built around the fundamental premise that law is just a weapon and that 99% of the time it's used for the lucky few
Beautiful video, most people who talk about Saul end up falling short of the shows own commentary, you managed to analyze character and plot and say more than show did itself! Great video
Yes! I've seen tonnes of BCS analyses of varying quality but this one stuck out as unique. I really like Ari's style. You should watch his BB one too if you haven't
I never thought about Chuck as representing what the law "is," but shit, that makes perfect sense. Chuck is probably the greatest defender of what the law is, he spouts probably the most character filibusters about what it represents, but ultimately? He's just as human and fucked up as the rest of us. Maybe even more so. He's the way the law can be used as a bludgeon against people when all the impartiality is finally blasted away. And while there's definitely merit to his argument that "Slippin' Jimmy is a chimp with a machinegun," his efforts to keep Jimmy in a personal hell where he can never move forward (which, now that I think about it, isn't that different from how parole often works) definitely instilled in Jimmy the idea that he might as well be a criminal if the straight and narrow only got him punished.
I don’t usually comment on videos but your content is so good that I’m commenting and liking specifically to boost you. Your work deserves far more attention!
Your channel is criminaly underrated especially for someone who is relatively new your essays are so amzingly constructed and though out,this channel has a great future and i hope you keep it up you earned a sub
Positive law is different from Natural law. Positive law relates to the social sciences and game theory. Philosophy certainly has a connection to truth, justice, and prudence. Some of the cardinal virtues
Love this video and your editing style, I’ve watched plenty of BCS ‘analysis’ videos that are just rehashed summaries. This feels so much more complete esp with the real world examples. Also great music and timing in the editing (like 6:40) Love your channel!
Great video, you provided a very unique and insightful perspective that I’ve never considered before. I think your analysis of each character was spot-on. I’ll definitely be thinking about this for a while!
Of many many BCS essays I've watched, this is one of my favourites. I feel like you covered all the main points I've seen elsewhere but with your own unique additions and style too. I love your inclusion of real world political analysis through the lens of media. Really great work, Ali 🙏❣️
Jimmy and Kim also are up and comers, class wise. They have to commit crimes to climb up. Those who are already at top, probably have their lot handed down to them from the crimes of their parents, or their parents. This kind of noir story telling has a particular political realism to it.
I think you have brought up an excellent point that I don't see/hear people talking about. I thought that everyone "breaking" the rules in the show was pretty clear, Chuck lies, Howard lies, both of them use their power and influence to try push people around and all of their colleagues do the same. All the professionals are more shady, more so than the criminals who at least seemed to try their best to adhere to their own code of ethics.
@@leviswranglers2813 one of the best themes of BB/BCS is that disobeying a code of ethics has consequences. Your word has to be gold or you will be murdered in cold blood and it’s just business. However, this theme isn’t reciprocated at all in the legal world. They lie, they gaslight, they trump up charges, they manipulate the system- the legal hierarchy is quite literally mirrored with the carteles in these shows. The actors of the legal system only rarely break the law, but they always “break the rules” whereas the carteles and Gus are the exact opposite such that their existence as drug lords breaks the law, but they only rarely “break the rules” of the business they are running and when they do, they are murdered or targeted and then it’s just the biggest muscle wins. Best example of this is Werner. He never did anything wrong but he broke the rules. Subsequently, he was killed and he even put his wife in danger. Mike is torn up over it knowing he killed what was essentially an innocent man, but again- your word has to be gold or you will be murdered in cold blood.
@@BradsGonnaPlay while I agree with most of what you said, I’m not sure if your black and white analogy of you break rules= death is correct or even applicable in real life. An example that comes to mind is howard simply being there at the wrong time that still got him done. Maybe it’s what the show focuses on but that isn’t the main take from it
@@smileyent.3055 ironic that you called my statement black and white lol Lessen the consequences and the rule definitely applies. Break trust one too many times = unreliable friend/family member Break work conduct multiple times = fired It’s not just death. Your word has to be unbreakable in the BB/BCS world or there are consequences; some worse than others- just like real life.
One small criticism- when you're talking about the "red corner vs the blue corner," you describe the legal world as the red and the criminal world as the blue, but in the show it's the opposite, the legal world is represented as blue while the criminal world as red. Amazing video either way, that was just bugging me a bit
This is the best analysis of BCS I’ve seen. Too many channels tend to side with chuck and don’t analyze the full context of the show to make an argument that Jimmy is solely responsible for his actions (which he is).
These are all fantastic, I know the algorithm isn't kind to people who take the time to make videos but I sincerely hope your success continues to grow as I can only imagine what you could do with a bigger budget.
There's never going to be a perfect system, because any system is built by imperfect human beings. The Rule of Law is not some theistic ideal to have faith in. It's something we all have to reinforce by making it work for the greatest possible good.
3:17 Better Cali Sally - Kim’s secret child by Jimmy, born roughly nine months following Howard’s death, moves to California in adulthood and starts a new drug empire 🎩
Corrupt is perhaps not the term id use, but he's far from the perfect federal agent. With how he's ok with letting jesse die to bust walt, and he also didn't report everything to the dea because he wanted to personally catch heisenberg
Was so excited to watch this, but I'm only halfway through season 5, so for now it's going on my watch later playlist. Looking forward to seeing it soon!
Very well done Niash. This video will blow up soon if the audience has any taste! I think you will gain many new views coming off the heels of BCS ending. All the best.
6:28 why did you say that Tuco Salamanca is the son of Cliff Main? is it some sort of meme that I don't know about? any comments explaining this will help because I can't find anything in google regarding this, thank you
Hope yall like. I found that the audio in this video was a little jumpy and could've sounded better, and so I'll be getting a new, better mic to use starting with my next video. Be sure to frolick and otherwise gather resources for my return! Looking to upload the next video sooner than this one; a much shorter gap than the time between this and my whitelib video.
A good place to start combating police corruption and something that is never brought up because the power they hold r the police Union’s. They r the driving force behind police misconduct and corruption thru the protection they provide to their members. 1 big problem these unions create is the fact that there is no separation between those who r 2 follow orders the low ranking street cop from those who give the orders the higher ranking cops who r 2 hold those below him/her responsible when they mess up. They r all brothers and sisters of the Union and r taught to keep any problems among union members only. In the corporate world there is a separation between union/ labor who best interests r those of the union members and management who best interests r those of the corporation / share holders. If a business were to be ran the way police departments r they would fail but police departments r funded by the city who is funded by the tax payer. Since this the case the more the police department fails it’s city the higher the crime and the higher the funding is for the department. Its not in the best interests of the police to do a good job it’s in there best interest to fail.
I don't know if we can say that Huell was "clearly" guilty of assault, ESPECIALLY under the presented conditions. His actions could be seen as attempting to defend his employer from a heckler. And more importantly, the prosecution's side was completely fabricated, as Huell definitely didn't recognize the man or intend to hurt him significantly at all. But since no one cared to listen to that fact, it was either get Huell off, or let him take a punishment he obviously didn't deserve that was based on false information.
I see what you mean, but I'd disagree. Huell walked right up to two dudes in an argument and knocked one of them upside the head, sending him to the ground. There was no indication that jimmysaul was in any danger; the cop wasn't threatening to use force, wasn't brandishing a weapon, wasn't approaching him threateningly. An argument isn't reason to hit somebody across the head, especially when you know nothing about the argument itself or its context. You're right that he didn't hurt him significantly, which would fall under the legal definition of battery. But assault is much more lax, and only requires an attempt to use force, which he 100% exhibited.
Huell is pretty sick so I'm not complaining lol but even if the cop didn't pull the 'he recognized me' card, Huell was done until Kim stepped in in my opinion.
@@diamondbrook yeah I have no problem with Huell getting a punishment, it just frustrates me to see lawyers conflating it to a much bigger issue than it really was and having no room for discussion on it, like they don't really care what the truth is. Although I guess a jury would probably think Huell had a vendetta on the cop too, I guess I just empathize with Huell since I know the story. Damn can he swing some sandwiches though
@@diamondbrook but there’s also a point to make bout how huell thought that was the action to take so intuitively no? There’s people you can just punch and there’s people you can’t, and that in itself is unjust. Reforming people like Huell is important, but reforming a system that protects some and takes no efforts whatsoever to protect others, to the point where people don’t think twice before punching someone is in itself an interesting point the show is making, imo.
@@diamondbrook especially since jimmy and kim see the fact that the guy he punched was a cop as a inconvenience, showing they believe the same thing
It chaps my ass that assaulting an off duty plain clothes cop is assaulting an officer. Yes, it was assault. But he had no way of knowing the guy was an officer. The prosecution probably would have lost at trial
"while Kim does quit her career as a lawyer and Lalo quits his career as a living, breathing human being." _laughs and hits subscribe_
Saul goodman got 7 years in prison
Jimmy got 86
A very succint summary. The lying, cheating, scumbag whom only cares about money gets the lighter sentence, whereas the man who takes responsibility for his crimes gets the longer sentence.
One thing that is different about Jimmy, as opposed to many of the other law breakers on this show, is Jimmy tends to con when another injustice happens, something the law should be accounting for, but doesn't. Sandpiper is a good case, they were actively obstructing justice, so he felt he had to con to have justice served. Another example of Jimmy recognizing this was falling on the sword, after his greed turned Irene's friends against her. Because there was an injustice served there, Jimmy felt the need to con his way back to where he felt life was fair again, or at least set things back a little bit.
In that regard, I think Jimmy has the most complex idea of what justice and law is. One of his greatest lines in the show is telling Bill Oakley "Yes it was!" to the comment "That wasn't a crime" about Jimmy getting Chuck's insurance rates raised. No one in that court room can even process the problem here, but for Jimmy it's arguably worse than actually breaking the law.... cause it is. Sure, he followed the law, but he was able to hurt someone that way too, arguably worse than any law breaker could have.
"No one in that court room can even process the problem here" that is a massive reach. Bill Oakley was asking because he's Saul's damn lawyer, that doesn't mean none of the humans in the courtroom are able to discern the fact that pushing a close sibling to commit suicide is a bad thing 💀
@@lucienrichardson1650 lol what are you talking about? Bill Oakley literally proclaims "That isn't a crime". Work on your reading comprehension~
this was so beautiful i teared up at the end. such a good and well-constructed essay keep it up dude
Did NOT expect people to react like that. Surprised but good surprised. So glad you enjoyed it.
@@diamondbrook ca you make a video on how to make such astute analyses and essays like you have?
Just incredible-always great to see BCS analysis as nuanced and thoughtful as the show itself
What a well-thought-out analysis. My favourite aspect of Better Call Saul are the different interesting characters which represent different degrees of being lawful or criminal and the resulting interactions of these characters meeting each other.
Connecting these traits to more general problems with the system of law and examples of failures of the law in real life is simply amazing.
Nice analysis man, congrats.
The only thing I think that was missed was in the analysis of Kim - she didn’t allow darkness to take hold only for her own vendetta against Howard, I think she was also motivated by her passion for Jimmy - she wanted to appease Saul, the person she thought Jimmy was becoming & thus these two dogfighters spiralled above a cloudline where they met a crimson sun.
Amazing video! BCS is my favorite show not only for it's stellar story and characters but because it also teaches viewers a very valuable lesson: that legality is not a guide for morality. The Justice system does have some good individuals within it, people just like Howard Hamlin, but the system as a whole is morally bankrupt. Love this video especially when comparing Mike's past as a dirty cop to real world parallels like the Chicago PD.
12:06 this editing was fantastic too.
Incredibly well said. Every layer of this show is built around the fundamental premise that law is just a weapon and that 99% of the time it's used for the lucky few
Beautiful video, most people who talk about Saul end up falling short of the shows own commentary, you managed to analyze character and plot and say more than show did itself! Great video
Yes! I've seen tonnes of BCS analyses of varying quality but this one stuck out as unique. I really like Ari's style.
You should watch his BB one too if you haven't
You have got to be one of the most underrated channels on this site. Keep it up man!
Awh thank u☺
I never thought about Chuck as representing what the law "is," but shit, that makes perfect sense. Chuck is probably the greatest defender of what the law is, he spouts probably the most character filibusters about what it represents, but ultimately?
He's just as human and fucked up as the rest of us. Maybe even more so. He's the way the law can be used as a bludgeon against people when all the impartiality is finally blasted away. And while there's definitely merit to his argument that "Slippin' Jimmy is a chimp with a machinegun," his efforts to keep Jimmy in a personal hell where he can never move forward (which, now that I think about it, isn't that different from how parole often works) definitely instilled in Jimmy the idea that he might as well be a criminal if the straight and narrow only got him punished.
I don’t usually comment on videos but your content is so good that I’m commenting and liking specifically to boost you. Your work deserves far more attention!
Your channel is criminaly underrated especially for someone who is relatively new your essays are so amzingly constructed and though out,this channel has a great future and i hope you keep it up you earned a sub
Flip the ">10%" to "
eating dinner w this one. great release keep it up!
Amazing. Been waiting since this clip was announced!
babe wake up ali nisah uploaded
Incredible video and dissection of all the law-bound characters and what they represent, really enjoyed every single second of it.
Positive law is different from Natural law. Positive law relates to the social sciences and game theory. Philosophy certainly has a connection to truth, justice, and prudence. Some of the cardinal virtues
I am so happy you did this video especially seeing how you just knocked it out of the park with the Walt and Jesse show video
Love this video and your editing style, I’ve watched plenty of BCS ‘analysis’ videos that are just rehashed summaries. This feels so much more complete esp with the real world examples. Also great music and timing in the editing (like 6:40) Love your channel!
loved that mac miller good news instrumental really puts you in a place in my heart
Great video, you provided a very unique and insightful perspective that I’ve never considered before. I think your analysis of each character was spot-on. I’ll definitely be thinking about this for a while!
This video deserves more views and likes and you deserve way more subscribers
if you keep making videos this good i'll have no choice but to watch them all 😤😤😤
You covered it all so well! Based.
Saw your other vids. Subbed
Hope you get the views you deserve.
Of many many BCS essays I've watched, this is one of my favourites. I feel like you covered all the main points I've seen elsewhere but with your own unique additions and style too. I love your inclusion of real world political analysis through the lens of media.
Really great work, Ali 🙏❣️
amazing job yet again, nicely made constructed essay for bcs
You continue to knock it out of the park my dude, I look forward to more of your essays
I used to be subscribed to your previous channel and I thank the TH-cam algorithm for having recommended one of your videos to me!
I can't tell if he said "Jimothy" ironically or unironically
“In one corner, we have the rule of law” over a clip of Howard’s funeral. Rip
Unique style, quality and eye for the detail.
U r doing really good content sir
i let out such a big smile when i heard the shook ones l sample. amazing video
Man that ending section was about as powerful as the final episode itself
Jimmy and Kim also are up and comers, class wise. They have to commit crimes to climb up. Those who are already at top, probably have their lot handed down to them from the crimes of their parents, or their parents. This kind of noir story telling has a particular political realism to it.
I think you have brought up an excellent point that I don't see/hear people talking about. I thought that everyone "breaking" the rules in the show was pretty clear, Chuck lies, Howard lies, both of them use their power and influence to try push people around and all of their colleagues do the same. All the professionals are more shady, more so than the criminals who at least seemed to try their best to adhere to their own code of ethics.
@@leviswranglers2813 one of the best themes of BB/BCS is that disobeying a code of ethics has consequences. Your word has to be gold or you will be murdered in cold blood and it’s just business.
However, this theme isn’t reciprocated at all in the legal world. They lie, they gaslight, they trump up charges, they manipulate the system- the legal hierarchy is quite literally mirrored with the carteles in these shows. The actors of the legal system only rarely break the law, but they always “break the rules” whereas the carteles and Gus are the exact opposite such that their existence as drug lords breaks the law, but they only rarely “break the rules” of the business they are running and when they do, they are murdered or targeted and then it’s just the biggest muscle wins.
Best example of this is Werner. He never did anything wrong but he broke the rules. Subsequently, he was killed and he even put his wife in danger. Mike is torn up over it knowing he killed what was essentially an innocent man, but again- your word has to be gold or you will be murdered in cold blood.
@@BradsGonnaPlay while I agree with most of what you said, I’m not sure if your black and white analogy of you break rules= death is correct or even applicable in real life. An example that comes to mind is howard simply being there at the wrong time that still got him done. Maybe it’s what the show focuses on but that isn’t the main take from it
@@smileyent.3055 ironic that you called my statement black and white lol
Lessen the consequences and the rule definitely applies.
Break trust one too many times = unreliable friend/family member
Break work conduct multiple times = fired
It’s not just death. Your word has to be unbreakable in the BB/BCS world or there are consequences; some worse than others- just like real life.
Agree👍laws are made to dominate the weak and the stupid( and annoying people)
Great video dude!
"Jimothy Mcgill"
Great Video keep up the good work happy to discover you just subscribed looking forward to more, it's all Good Man!
Exceptional analysis, going through your other videos now and hoping you can continue to make them!
0:27 lol Jimothy
this is by far one of the very best thoughts i've heard about the show. thank you so much. brilliant
I need more of this in my life. Thank you.
Best video essay I’ve seen in a long time
One small criticism- when you're talking about the "red corner vs the blue corner," you describe the legal world as the red and the criminal world as the blue, but in the show it's the opposite, the legal world is represented as blue while the criminal world as red. Amazing video either way, that was just bugging me a bit
This was great commentary. Nicely done!
Thank you 🤗 more videos on their way.
How does this video only have 35k views? This algorithm needs to go to work.
Hope to see more of your content, you have a unique presentation that’s really engaging.
Yet another banger. Was waiting so long for this one!
great choice of music, that rambourine in anenome is iconic
This is the best analysis of BCS I’ve seen. Too many channels tend to side with chuck and don’t analyze the full context of the show to make an argument that Jimmy is solely responsible for his actions (which he is).
Excellent video, very well communicated and extremely thorough.
Amazing video. Fantastic analysis of one of the best shows of the decade (:
Amazing job on this video!
These are all fantastic, I know the algorithm isn't kind to people who take the time to make videos but I sincerely hope your success continues to grow as I can only imagine what you could do with a bigger budget.
Jimothy McGill Esquire.
There's never going to be a perfect system, because any system is built by imperfect human beings. The Rule of Law is not some theistic ideal to have faith in. It's something we all have to reinforce by making it work for the greatest possible good.
One of the best videos I've seen about BCS/BB, especially as you delve into the injustices of white collar crime!
Such a good video essay! Can't wait for the next video
Ohhhh so excited to see another video from you!!
the music in the backround of this video goes crazy
Another banger
awesome video, keep it up!
Amazing video!! Scary to see all the real world connections to what goes on in the show and the real world
3:17 Better Cali Sally - Kim’s secret child by Jimmy, born roughly nine months following Howard’s death, moves to California in adulthood and starts a new drug empire 🎩
Jimothy McGill💀
Hang on, when did Hank ever show himself to be corrupt? At 21:00 you imply that Hank abuses his power but he was a straight arrow from what I remember
Corrupt is perhaps not the term id use, but he's far from the perfect federal agent. With how he's ok with letting jesse die to bust walt, and he also didn't report everything to the dea because he wanted to personally catch heisenberg
an issue as old as time, the phrase "who watches the watchmen" is from Roman times
edit: just finished the video, it was great. thank you
“Jimothy McGill”
This is a phenomenal video. Well done sir❤️👍🏾
So happy to see you upload again! you’re easily becoming one of my favorite channels
"Tuco is Cliff Mains son" 💀💀 This was a dope video keep it up 💯
Great analysis! What a dope video.
Was so excited to watch this, but I'm only halfway through season 5, so for now it's going on my watch later playlist. Looking forward to seeing it soon!
There is one huge mistake: All the lawbreakers wear some kind of red in BCS and the lawman wear blue
the boxing analogy therefore drives me crazy :D
what’s the name of the song that plays when the Jimmy&Chuck part of the video essay commences??
That's it. You're my favorite video essayist.
Really good analysis, would love to see something like this again 👍
Sneaking some Money Trees in the video was a good idea. GKMC is beautiful.
Great stuff, love your analysis and channel!
Always interesting analysis well done my man
15:00 there is a men called finger
damn good video man
loved this show so much
Dude, you're criminally under-subbed. Good stuff, keep it up :)
Nice job. Great questions. Thoughtful stuff...
Such an underrated channel
Your videos are great so far, hope to see more 👍
Keep this work up. Tremendous stuff.
Very well done Niash. This video will blow up soon if the audience has any taste! I think you will gain many new views coming off the heels of BCS ending. All the best.
6:28 why did you say that Tuco Salamanca is the son of Cliff Main? is it some sort of meme that I don't know about? any comments explaining this will help because I can't find anything in google regarding this, thank you
it was revealed in WatchMojo's Top 20 Breaking Bad references that yes, Tuco was birthed from Cliff Main's luscious child bearing hips
good channel. you deserve to grow
Great Video!
turn your mic volume up, please
A half-hour analysis of BCS? Your my type of guy 👍
Can't wait for Saul Shankman Redemption movie with Kim Wexler narrating it.
6:28 wait what?
yeah i was confused too
Ah yes the breaking bad universe lore momentum 100 pt.2 electric waterloo