The Square Wave 1961

แชร์
ฝัง

ความคิดเห็น • 36

  • @w3vjp568
    @w3vjp568 6 ปีที่แล้ว +37

    Is it just me, or does the opening music sound like the score to nearly every 50's sci-fi movie?

    • @sto2779
      @sto2779 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      gives me the questionable goosebumps...

  • @cattflap1447
    @cattflap1447 6 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    Here thx to Mr Carlsons Lab .. . Great Channel :)

    • @lo2740
      @lo2740 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      good for you, sheep

  • @JoseSilveira-newhandleforYT
    @JoseSilveira-newhandleforYT 6 ปีที่แล้ว +25

    Excellent tutorial and equally valid today. Pitty the image quality is so poor that it's hard to see much detail. Probably the original film recording is no longer available and this was taken from VHS tapes or similar.
    I thank Mr. Carlson's Lab for pointing me to this channel.

  • @SJayanth
    @SJayanth 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Just how close is a quarter of a billionth of a second to zero rise time?
    well, ask how close is a billion to infinity!
    Such a beautiful line at the end.

  • @JetNmyFuture
    @JetNmyFuture 7 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    "....approaching 1 and a half of a billion cycles per second" - times have changed. We now have 100 Ghz scopes at the exotic level and I have a 6Ghz scope on my bench as the 'daily driver'
    Fantastic film that does a nice job of explaining the content and structure of a square wave and its importance.

  • @siddikanasari2867
    @siddikanasari2867 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very very best tektronics instruments

  • @PecanPie1102
    @PecanPie1102 6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Love memory Lane, Intel Xenon at 4 ghz now. Thanks Mr Carlson. 2017

  • @OctavMandru
    @OctavMandru 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Such amazing explanations, excellent work for bringing back to us these awesome videos

  • @materialsguy2002
    @materialsguy2002 7 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Thanks for posting all these videos

  • @Daveyk021
    @Daveyk021 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Very educational, more so than I remember learning in electronics scool 38 years ago.

    • @foureyedchick
      @foureyedchick 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      School, not Scool

  • @sto2779
    @sto2779 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    5:30 - that makes sense... I bet most people doesn't know how a square wave is truly formed.

    • @oldolfmann8927
      @oldolfmann8927 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I bet you think it is composed of many frequencies

    • @sto2779
      @sto2779 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@oldolfmann8927 Well isn’t this so stated on the video? However I think this is only true making square waves using analog tech. However modern square waves are digital, it is not composed of analog frequencies.

  • @leeslevin7602
    @leeslevin7602 ปีที่แล้ว

    Brilliant!

  • @warphammer
    @warphammer 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    "Hey, Joe, try not to show off that HP audio generator too close." Great film, though!

  • @INeedAttentionEXE
    @INeedAttentionEXE 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Here from Carlson lab -like a lot of other people- and just like him I’ve never hit sub so quickly.

  • @MaxKoschuh
    @MaxKoschuh 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    excellent upload
    excellent video

  • @babakvernal6696
    @babakvernal6696 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent

  • @joefutofu
    @joefutofu 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you for uploading this video, at work I don't know how these things work

  • @grzesiek1x
    @grzesiek1x ปีที่แล้ว

    I like this dramatic music haha

  • @Kryoclasm
    @Kryoclasm 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good info!

  • @pietromoopy2010
    @pietromoopy2010 ปีที่แล้ว

    They were way more coherent in explaining things back then. Everything wasn't a sales pitch.

  • @andrewlindh5047
    @andrewlindh5047 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    So a quarter of a billionth of a second would be a 250ps rise time....and viewing it when tubes still ruled electronics. (edit: oops, math corrected, thanks)

    • @gigadabyte
      @gigadabyte 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Correct if I'm wrong but 1e-9/4=250e-12, so 250ps. Even today that is fast. Greetings.

  • @sujitsingh7446
    @sujitsingh7446 ปีที่แล้ว

    You did not mention the value of C1 and C2.

  • @mishu9356
    @mishu9356 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    🤕😵

  • @amarissimus29
    @amarissimus29 ปีที่แล้ว

    Of course we all know the answer to the last question is 42. Shouldn't even have to ask.

  • @sujitsingh7446
    @sujitsingh7446 ปีที่แล้ว

    Picture quality is poor.

  • @phonotical
    @phonotical 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    low quality and 240p? come on¬

    • @ydonl
      @ydonl 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      This is how technologies develop over time. It has always been this way. It always will be this way. The film was apparently made about 60 years ago, so... no, it doesn't look the same as if it had been made last year!

    • @phonotical
      @phonotical 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ydonl its on 35mm film, you can blow that up to 8ki easily, this just looks like a video from a 90s server

    • @ydonl
      @ydonl 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@phonotical I'm not sure you're being realistic.

    • @phonotical
      @phonotical 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ydonl youre not understanding my comment