Nikon 14-30 lens vs 24-120. Why compare these 2 lenses? Plus a tedious update on monopods.

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 5 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 7

  • @smkunder1
    @smkunder1 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Love your videos, I would love to get that 24-120, but the hit you take on the 24-70 is a killer

    • @folkartandcamera
      @folkartandcamera  ปีที่แล้ว

      yep, the retail on both lenses is nearly the same, but the 24-70 doesn't hold its value anywhere near. thanks for the comment!

    • @Hrishi1970
      @Hrishi1970 ปีที่แล้ว

      Did you mean the 24-70mm f4 or f2.8?

    • @smkunder1
      @smkunder1 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Hrishi1970 the F4

  • @andresce1308
    @andresce1308 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    It appears the lenses were not centered the same and they gave different looks. Also, various lenses have different reproduction rates. Some lenses at same focal length will show a reduced image depending on brand and year of production. Not sure what this video is pointing out. They are both great lenses. 24-120 is known as a videographers lens. The 14-30 is known as the landscapers lens. Their usage make them different, but no better than the other.

    • @folkartandcamera
      @folkartandcamera  ปีที่แล้ว

      you have a keen eye. at one point I looked at the tripod and thought the ball head had drooped a little. wasn't entirely sure but I re-shot a couple of the comparisons. While the 24-120 is an essential lens, I find I'm shooting my studio segments almost entirely on the 14-30 now. Since making the video I believe the 14-30 is finding focus quicker when I move around in the frame. thanks for the comment!

    • @andresce1308
      @andresce1308 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@folkartandcamera 14-30 does focus a bit faster. I own the lens as well. I actually returned my 24-120 and purchased the 24-70 S 2.8. All good lenses. I would buy the 24-120 refurbished by Nikon when they have them in stock. Your videos look great.