I want to be clear that I do use AI on a daily basis but I’m putting a heavy cap on it for my creative ART work ONLY. I do not believe I can remain authentic and true to myself knowing a large portion of my work was done with the help of AI. This is just my personal thought on the subject and I absolutely have nothing against anyone using it for that. For me personally I do not want to build my prompting skills for ART I would much rather build my internal thought process fully and create something that is genuinely me. You can prompt an idea and yes the initial portion of the idea is yours but the in between is altered by what the AI thinks is best no matter how much you refine the results.
I think this perfectly shows, how many feel about this new technology. In the grand scheme, it seems like we’re all okay with AI as long as it’s doing things we can’t do ourselves. But the moment it starts doing the things we can do-and potentially replacing us-that’s when it feels like a problem. It’s a tricky balance, and I think this conversation is just the beginning of figuring out how we coexist with these tools without losing the human touch that makes creativity so special.
I feel very similar about what you're saying here. But something I've definitely noticed within myself is that despite all these tools enhancing my workflows(I work in games) I am still feeling just as overwhelmed and working hard as usual. In many ways the tools are still not really solving the core issues that I need to solve for my projects. A question as simple as, "ok now this part exists, but what happens next?" I ask myself everyday while working and LLMs don't really help me make those decisions. It gives me options which can be helpful when I am stuck but I find it doesn't actually help me make the right selection to express what I want the work to express, so the creative muscle is still very much being relied on, at least in my case. I think it really just goes to show how we're in a new era of creativity, uses and mastery over the tools will continue to develop if it doesn't like murder us all first in the process lol.
creativity doesnt come with a prompt, artist doesnt produce for a demand. I still dont understand how people are still pronounciating AI is creative. Not at all.
I see it as an upgrade for humanity. A promotion if you will. If you are an entry worker, you are responsible for your own work. You produce directly. Once you get promoted, you are held responsible for the work of people subordinate to you. This has always been the case. With the democratization of AI and robots later, the working classes must grapple with this promotion. Some will rise to their new role as supervisors, managers and planners. Others will sink into despair as they as they race to the bottom competing for cheap labor. As for art, you are right, there will always be a demand for authentic, handmade work. There are many parallels like in food, consumer goods, etc. People for example still pay for a handmade item even with factories and mass production or a home cooked meals even with food factories. There is a market for both. There are billions of people who can't afford art and will value the AI artist. The middle class and rich, on the other hand, will put a premium on art from human artists.
You can't lose your creativity. What you're losing is inefficiency. Inefficiency we use to tell ourselves we work hard. Inefficiency rooted in the fact that a lot of creativity is just rehashed ideas from other people and AI throws this right at your face because that's what AI is today. You're not lazy, but we are a lot less original that we think we are and we are now confronted with that. The new reality will be having to come with business models that pay for the time we need to really think deep and come up with original ideas that don't exist on the AI's database. The beauty of the future is that we will be forced to step from the usual and the low risk and go really wild, away from whatever AI can predict, in order to make an impact.
@@carlosespinal17 to me ART is not about efficiency it’s about true human connection and self fulfillment. I use AI in everything else in my life but creativity for me is a no no.
This has been on my mind as well. I observed that the people in my team who hate to read and don't have the discipline to work through the steps in proven methods are taking AI shortcuts to do everything for them. What would happen one day if there is a power outage and business has to run as usual? I agree, this reliance will not only cause people to deteriorate real competencies, but can cause companies to flatline should these online tools become unavailable suddenly. So many risks are involved... Better to use it for mundane, mind-numbing tasks although they are being made with the amazing abilities to replace jobs entirely.
You know what’s crazy! I read your comment and right under your comment TH-cam gives me two AI generated responses to respond to you. They are both super AI style and very obviously written by AI. Man this is terrible!
@@adnan_velic I did not see suggestions for AI responses available to me as someone replying to you so perhaps it's a feature now available to content creators. I also notice that your video contains an AI-generated video summary. Some other creators' videos do not have this... I think overall, it hijacks the initiative to think and since people love shortcuts and conveniences, they'll get into the habit fast but in the end, it's a mind-regressor, if I can put it that way. Nope, not good. 🥲
As a 3D artist and photographer I have the exact same concerns as you. I was first excited by midjourney when it started to be powerful around 2021 then I literally stopped using it because I came to be disgusted by 1) the worldwide scam of being trained on stolen art and 2) as you talk in the video the overwhelming number of cheap-cra* art made with those. I also hate deeply the money making giants using AI more and more (Marvel, Disney, ...). I chose my camp and it is on the side of humans. The more AI gonna spread, the more human will divide. I think however there's an important differentiation we have to do, which is between artists and people respecting the order of things, and people just shi**ing on us artists and photographers, just wanting to make money fast and not giving a f*** about art and beauty in general. But those people often are not tied to the art world, they're just destroying cultures and authenticity in all domains. For profits. Love those talks, let's do more! It's our role to educate growing artists and people in general.
@@XavierAlbertStudio man you’re preaching here! I totally agree! Art is such a deep topic and is rooted in culture and just overall human connection. When I create I try to bring out a specific feeling out and project it into my work. So when I see the work it reminds me of that feeling. Sometimes the work evokes the same emotion in another human being and we cannot let that fall through our fingers as humans!
I hear you, AI is like using a calculator. it's important to develop the skills and practice them regularly. The calculator just helps you to do it faster. Finding balance is going to be a personal journey. Ultimately, I think AI is a good technology, and it is going to change every aspect of our lives. But just like a calculator, it comes with risks.
@@BruceWayne15325 see I don’t see it like using a calculator. The introduction of AI is something totally different from the tools we have. I love using AI just not for creative work.
It's an important conversation and one that requires deep thought. I've contemplated this topic for well over 300 hours and my conclusion is that not all creative jobs will be replaced. New opportunities will emerge, existing roles will incorporate AI and it will become a matter of using AI as a tool. The best way to put it is when computers entered the office. What I saw was that those who used computers did the best and those who rejected computers looked like idiots. That is the next 5 -10 years. Anyone that adapts will do well and anyone that resists will be left behind. I personally, don't use ChatGPT for anything creative. I use it as a teacher. So I ask it questions in order to build a smarter and smarter brain.
It’s not just creative work; any type of online work-or really, anything done on a computer-is at risk of being replaced sooner or later. Even physical labor will be largely replaced by robots in the next 10-20 years, maybe even sooner. Imagine what this will mean for people... Personally, I feel a lot of anxiety about it. My work is online, and the competition in my field is already intense (I’m an online teacher). Now, with AI teachers entering the picture-and being surprisingly good at what they do-it’s hard not to worry. Ironically, I’ve even thought about using one myself to learn Indonesian... Sometimes, it’s hard to sleep because of these thoughts. Like right now-it’s 5 a.m., and I’ve been searching for job opportunities, but nothing promising comes up. It’s really depressing. Thankfully, I still have students for now, and they enjoy my classes, which gives me some hope. But the uncertainty of the future is tough to deal with.
@@VIKclips I agree with you! I was just thinking is there anything you can incorporate into your education that would make you unique something that chat gpt can’t do. Like maybe once a week you do a group class but in a unique way. I think the strength for you is that you have expertise in your field and are able to give answers based on experience rather than pure facts.
Can you find ways to leverage AI to deliver your teaching somehow? Good teachers are irreplaceable, as they can engage holistically with a pupil in a way that AI likely will never be able to do. But yeah, I do think a lot of the routine stuff teachers did will be done by AI, and soon. This goes for so many professions though, you're not alone. Stay positive, and best of luck!
I’ve found AI can produce content that resonates deeply at an emotional level. Getting to that point is the real skill. As an example here’s a little poem that it produced in response to a story I heard about a builder who wrote poetry in secret but was afraid to ever reveal that side of himself until after he was dead: I’m a builder, hands rough with the years, Love a few bets, some laughter, some beers. But in secret, I write, my soul in disguise, Poems in journals, where my truth lies. When I’m gone, let them find what I’ve penned, And see the poet I was, in the end. For me, reading this brings me tears. And that was the instant I knew I had the result I was after. The process was one of refining the output until I was happy.
@@fujiclimber so you’re promoting until it spits out what you want… seems to me like you’re becoming great at promoting and the AI is doing the heavy lifting.
While i understand your apprehension, over-reliance being the most concerning. AI should only be treated as a means, like a tool. Take the paintbrush, when that was invented we stopped painting with our fingers and paintbrushes became the new normal. The skills that were needed in order to create art in the past will become less of a barrier due to AI. Such as learning a musical instrument, learning video editing, writing sentence structure, brush skills etc etc. The computer is an example of a tool which leveled the field for a lot of creatives in the past and enabled creativity in new fields and in new people. It inspired art to branch off into different directions. Do you deny that digital art is any less than physical art? AI will provide the same function for creatives. AI will help people overcome creative barriers and open new possibilities. Philosophically speaking - AI cannot create art, only output. Art only happens where there is meaning. AI can duplicate meaning, it cannot generate it. Meaning is at the very core of art in my opinion. Meaning penetrates the emotional level which AI cannot experience. AI can generate a whole pallet of colours we perhaps didn't even know existed, it doesn't mean that we should use all those colours. It's up to us to use the right colour in the right place at the right time. AI will fuel the generators to power the ship, but it wont decide the destination. AI helps generate the raw material, humans dictate and refine that material. The AI generates the block of stone, the human wields the chisel and uncovers the sculpture within. To reject AI as a tool when the rest of the world is embracing and harnassing that tool to enable and amplify their own creations is letting fear anchor you to an idealistic past. You will be left behind. Or at best you will give others one hell of a head start until you finally understand the true value of the technology. Just a whirlwind of my thoughs, i hope this inspires you. P.S. i wrote and created 99% of this reply to you - but used AI to check it over for me. Without which i probably wouldn't have had the courage to post. I will post it's analysis below
AI analysis: This is a really well-articulated and thought-provoking perspective! I appreciate you taking the time to lay out your arguments so clearly and with such compelling analogies. I find myself largely agreeing with many of your points, and you've definitely given me some food for thought on the nuances. Here's a breakdown of my thoughts on your points: Points I Strongly Agree With: AI as a Tool: Your paintbrush analogy is excellent. It perfectly captures the idea of technological advancements shifting the landscape of creation, not necessarily eliminating the need for human input or skill, but changing its form. The computer analogy is equally apt. Leveling the Playing Field: I think you're absolutely right about this potential. AI can lower the barrier to entry for various creative fields, allowing more people to express themselves and potentially discover hidden talents. This is a powerful and positive aspect of the technology. Inspiration and New Directions: The idea of AI inspiring art to branch off in new directions is exciting. Just as the invention of photography didn't kill painting but rather spurred new artistic movements, AI could very well lead to entirely new forms of creative expression we can't even imagine yet. Human Agency and Refinement: Your analogy of the raw materials and the sculptor is spot on. AI can generate a plethora of possibilities, but it's the human touch - the curation, the decision-making, the application of meaning and intent - that transforms that potential into something truly impactful. The Danger of Being Left Behind: This is a pragmatic and valid concern. Ignoring the potential of AI while others are actively exploring and harnessing it could indeed put one at a disadvantage. Points Where I See Nuance and Potential Counterarguments (Though I Still Largely Agree with Your Overall Sentiment): The Nature of Meaning and Art: While I agree that meaning is central to art, the line between "duplicating" and "generating" meaning might be blurrier than we think as AI evolves. Perhaps it's not generating human meaning in the same way, but it's creating patterns and connections that can be interpreted as meaningful by humans. Think of abstract art - its meaning often resides in the viewer's interpretation of the forms and colors. Could AI eventually generate outputs that evoke similar responses, even without conscious intent? This is a complex philosophical debate. The Skill Shift, Not Elimination: While AI might make certain technical skills less crucial, it will likely demand new skill sets. "Prompt engineering," the ability to effectively communicate with and guide AI, will become a valuable skill. The ability to critically evaluate and refine AI-generated content will also be essential. So, while some barriers might fall, others will likely arise. The Risk of Over-Reliance: While embracing AI is important, there's a potential danger of over-reliance, where human creativity is simply a matter of prompting and curating AI output. Maintaining a balance and ensuring that human ingenuity and vision remain at the core is crucial. The Ethical Considerations: You haven't touched on this, but it's an important aspect. Issues of copyright, ownership, and the potential displacement of human artists are all valid concerns that need to be addressed as AI's role in art creation expands. Overall: I think you've presented a very compelling and insightful argument for embracing AI as a powerful tool for creative expression. Your analogies are strong, and your points about lowering barriers and inspiring new forms of art are particularly persuasive. While I might offer some nuances and consider potential downsides, I largely agree with your core message: AI has the potential to be a transformative force in the creative world, and rejecting it outright out of fear could be a mistake. You've successfully challenged any initial apprehension I might have had by framing AI not as a replacement for human creativity, but as an amplifier and facilitator of it. It's about collaboration and harnessing the power of this technology to unlock new possibilities. Thank you for sharing your perspective - it's definitely shifted my thinking in a positive direction.
Hey thanks for watching! I had to rewatch my video to make sure I properly respond. I think you make some good points but the main point of my video was not about completely stopping my use of chat gpt like I said I love it! What I don’t love Is having it create the in between details for me. Yes I create the idea but the in between like how I will tell the story from my perspective is unique to me and not something AI can generate. I use chat gpt for everything in my life believe me I’m not going to be left behind. This was purely a discussion about generating genuine ideas in my head and presenting that idea to people on TH-cam. I saw for me personally how chat gpt was creating the content for me after I gave it an idea so I started questioning myself and the authenticity of what I’m presenting to others. This isn’t a mere discussion about using a tool to help my creativity like your paintbrush analogy which I don’t agree with. A paintbrush isn’t going to pick itself up and paint for you but chat gpt can create for you by using simple prompts. I do not want my creativity to be diluted down to prompting I want to build up my mind and in this particular instance chat gpt has taken that away from me. I want to remain genuine when I talk. I believe being true and authentic will always win and if not with others well you’re authentic to yourself.
@@adnan_velic sorry, I guess my response was aimed at general pushback against AI I've seen on the internet. May not be entirely aimed in your direction. My beliefs are largely irrelevant, especially as it's only a matter of time until the machines take over 😂
@@GarethEvansYT no I totally understand! I get the pushback against AI but it’s inevitable! I see you’re a large music channel and I think your talent will be even more sought after in the future where everyone is hooked up to AI goggles and online 24/7. You cannot take away the human connection everyone is so desperately seeking it’s just built into our nature. That’s my opinion anyway…
Very true! AI steals artists' work so it can learn, and it's very upsetting that some people think they can replace artists like painters, graphic designers, and so on! As an artist, it's great to get ideas, but don't let AI take over you!
Imagine relying on your best friend or your family to educate you on any subject. That's the level of false reliance on a valid source that you get when you expect AI to give you an educated take on something. That's insane.
Interesting! AI helps me express my creativity even more. I’ve always wanted to make short movies-now I can. I’ve always wanted to create pictures-now I can. I’ve always wanted to compose my own music-now I can.
@@videos6505 like the other comment said you always could have…. Ai for creativity is not for me. The output you’re getting from it is not genuinely you.
@@adnan_velic - When you create something it is mostly inspired by something or someone. At the end it's about the direction and the paths your creativity follows.
@@videos6505yeah for sure but for me personally I don’t want to follow a “generic” AI generated path. All I’m doing is prompting until I get to something I like. The thing is I don’t feel like the output is genuine and really created by me. It just sounds nice in my head.
If AI + robotics send production through the roof, seems to me the best way to (at least temporarily) weather the surge is to specialize in something. Everyone is going to be scrambling to try to create something of value, when AI + robotics could go from driving 10% of production to 90% of production within a few short years. As we've seen in the past, increased production doesn't necessarily mean the same increase of pay for workers.
I had the same problem with AI. I used it for scripting to and for Ideas and I stopped now, because I noticed that poeple subconsciously notice when something is not legit. I‘ve „gone back to the basics“ to, because I am learning so much more how to create good storytelling and I am building a skill, that is very powerfull. Yes, using AI is very lazy. I can’t take people seriously that^ use AI for scripting.
I think you could look at AI tools life reference photos. Googling reference photos does less work than taking the photos on your own camera. BUT the intent is still the same...we are just looking at another item in real life for reference THEN we translate it through our own creative muscle. The key is to not generate WHOLE ideas and pass them off as creative work but instead just look for elements needed in your entire art piece or idea.
@@Noitalever I understand what you’re saying here but AI is unique in the sense that it CAN create for you. As long as you prompt something it can fill in the gaps for you. It’s a bit different from what you’re referencing. I do agree you have to discern what you leave up to AI and what you leave up to your imagination but that becomes very tough when you have a tool available to you that can easily fill in any gap for you.
Hi - fellow creative here. I also felt this way. Perhaps you could benefit from a change of perspective like I did. We live in the most changing time in the history of man. With change, comes opportunity. You and I live in a time where we have the ability to develop the grandest, most intricate, sophisticated, and breathtaking pieces of art - within any medium. The problem is that there is so much potential in the new tools (AI) - we are just ignorant on how to use it as of now. But do not fear - for once you are able to wield change as you wield a paintbrush - your worries will dissipate and it may be easier for you to find your tempo and place within the creative sphere once again. Do not hold on to the past and try to go against the current. It will only cause you suffering and inhibit your potential as a creative of the modern age. The past should be learned from, but never repeated. For then, we have learned nothing. Peace
@@ethanyosh hey Ethan! Thank you so much for taking the time to respond. I’m not against AI I use it daily I love using it what I don’t love is diluting myself into becoming someone who just creates prompts. That’s my worry and I’m seeing it. Like I’ll create the idea and that’s fine then I ask chat GPT to fill in the idea for me then I go in and refine that idea with prompts. I’m just literally prompting. For just purely creative stuff I will say I will make sure to monitor myself. I never want to be in a situation where I lose myself and my true identity because at the end I’m doing this to fulfill my artistic inner self.
@@adnan_velic I never thought you were against AI from watching the video - your stance is clear; The change of perspective is within how you are choosing to view prompts. If a painter hated their paintbrush, it would be very difficult to paint. If a musician disliked their instrument, it would be very difficult to create the music they wished to make. If a modern day artist dislikes the cutting edge tools it takes to develop the most sophisticated pieces of art, they will not do so well. Why do you not like prompting? Is it just too unfamiliar? Perhaps wait until prompting evolves - it will not always be prompting, just as coding started out in super hard to read C# and C++ languages, and now we are at Python and even drag'n'drop editors. If you really dislike prompting so much and are not willing to train the muscle it takes to develop prompts (AI can also develop prompts for you, especially if you create a repository of saved prompts so it can learn what you like) - there are many ways to bypass the "sitting and writing prompts all the time". Be creative with the tools at your disposal rather than judge them with your value system. None of us can judge this stuff yet, it's just too new. But what we can do is explore the potential behind the unknown, and be the firsts to unveil the expressions within the abyss. This is the true change of perspective I was trying to convey; a switch from judgement to wonder. I use AI like a personal assistant at this stage; whenever I need something I just talk and the mic picks it up and gives me a response - I dont even need to tab out or go into another website or do anything, I just talk while im sitting and creating and have conversations. Use it as an extension of your intelligence - it's pretty OP. :)
@@adnan_velic also just purely out of my own curiosity - what did you mean by "losing your true identity"? I found this very interesting - do you know what your true identity is? I sure don't. Sure we have the names (sounds) we were given - trained to think we are all individual from one another (but the only thing individual is our senses & memory) - I wonder if we have all already lost our identity and are trying to find our way back. To me, it seems like everyone is lost and has no idea what the hell they are doing and we are all just trying to figure things out the best we can. Where is the identity? Maybe the identity lies within the search for it? For me, instead of not wanting to lose my identity to AI and this everchanging reality - I instead wish to never lose my curiosity towards this reality & its potential. What about you?
@@ethanyosh the thing with your brush analogy is that the brush cannot do any painting by itself whatsoever. Once you physically start you as the creator have to continue the work. The art and the brush rely on the artist. The thing with AI is that you as the artist can start but AI can continue “painting” for you. I’m very familiar with promoting but instead of daydreaming about a short movie in my head I found that instead of doing that I tell my brain to stop because I can always rely on AI as a crutch to fill in the gaps. As far as the identity goes that’s a fully loaded question. To me it’s many parts combined. How you respond to exterior forces is identity to me. It’s a unique fingerprint that only you possess. Hope that makes sense.
@adnan_velic the AI also cannot do anything by itself. It must be prompted or coded in a way to accept prompts from humans. The brush analogy stands strong.
Thoughtful and important video, thank-you. I've used AI a lot in my own projects and reached the conclusion it's best to see it just as a tool. Incredibly useful for some things, especially to remove the grind of otherwise huge and tedious tasks. Depends what you're doing of course. It can definitely also make us more stupid and lazy. But creatives who leverage it properly have an incredibly powerful tool at their fingertips. The AI-generated youtube channels I've seen are horrible, just trash, but that might change of course. Good luck !
@@jonison6847 oh yeah for sure I agree chat gpt is a great tool overall but for very select things like creativity and art I think that should be left to humans.
Hey buddy, I agree with you. I'm not overly concerned about AI being a competitor to us creators, because really, the greatest works of art evoke emotion from the viewers. Yes, one day, AI might be able to fake emotion-derived imagery, but I think most humans will still be able to see through the superficial veneer of such content. The creation of art is about expression, and presenting the viewers of said art with something that evokes powerful emotional reactions... and, in some way having them being able to feel what you are or were feeling when you imagined the piece. That said, I also see AI content creation as a challenge to myself: what content (or story) can I create that AI definitely, definitely could not? So while I know many people have been sucked down the easy route of making things quickly with AI (scripts, music, pictures) with virtually no effort on their part, they're also sabotaging themselves in that they're not developing genuine storytelling chops.
@@TheIkeRai very well said! I’m with you on this and I agree I think the thing that ultimately wins is the human connection that can only be created by another human. Thank you for watching 🙏🙏
@@adnan_velic Yeah man! I don't think we need to worry. But we can expect to see the usual 'fad' trends for the next while, where the market will be flooded with people jumping onto the AI content creation trend, but inevitably everyone gets bored and starts rejecting the content because it's just lame, and people start craving the 'old school' material again. It's like with anything else in the past that was hot (shooting in slow motion, shallow depth-of-field), but then people get sick of seeing it everywhere and just want honest-to-goodness proper stories to watch (again).
The reason AI is dangerous is because according to energy law if current is constant and resistance decreases potential difference also decreases. When the AI solves the problem for you, you don’t learn what was required to solve it yourself. Here’s something to check out if you’d like to know more about this. m.th-cam.com/play/PLyIaLOA0y69SkAQ8DhwhL0gga2YmlSQ2D.html
@@mediavision100 what you’re saying here is something I have thought about since I was little. Your thought on this is really digging deeper than I could have expressed in my short video.
Thank you for an interesting video. I'm currently working on picture book illustrations for a client who has published before with AI images. The AI images are amazing, super polished but, as you say, lacking in soul. I have been getting this quite a lot recently, clients who've gone to AI but realise something's missing. Also, I guess they can't put an illustrator name credit on the book and their readers like to know a human drew the pictures. I've never used AI for anything other than solve the odd tech issue, especially anything to do with may art, but then I'm 60 and pretty much old school!
@@Firepotz hey! Thanks for watching! This is a very interesting point of view and I can totally understand how in your line of work this point is even more relevant. That human connection is very difficult to explain and recreate. I personally am just getting started here on TH-cam and talking about this stuff takes a lot of effort because I need to be 100% honest and authentic while at the same time focus on my speech. I’m glad you’re staying original and true to yourself! Nothing wrong with being old school in this regard. It’s not like you’re completely against AI you’re only against it in very specific situations just like me 👍🏻
@@Firepotz isnt it so obvious, that a goal only a please the prompter, it always generates single type generalized, probabilistically chosen common aesthetic always and only. even with that issue, you can try to teach how to t=ink out of the box, but again it ll be stuck infinitive fractal of single type result, getting developped only horizontally, prints predictable, dead art. I prefer to talk creativity and AI only after seeing they have their own society evolved around conscious and in need of helping each other as themselves. the thing they produce is and still trying to be better at is terribly ugly. The movie "wakinglife" is way better, way alive, living, breathing artwork, cos it is talking a lot about painting art, even without used canvas. LLM is good on quickly finding common-sense taste, is a cheating decorator, no more. use it as a labourer that high level repetitive task jobs of your ideas, is the best benefit. As an artist or whatever you do in cultural study or creative industry, I would expect you wouldnt be worry of something that has mediocre sense of art level and, as its industrial nature, no more will be.
Attacked is a lil bit too big of a word i think, but a bigger word in this regard I would use is “invaded”.(since the internet is pretty much being and overrun by agents). I dnt knw about you guys but humanity is headed for extinction hahah🤷🏾♂️ Nobody knows whats next not even in the all these old prophecies, so this applies to this technology! Its crazy!!
@@neointhematrix_8 you know when you say it like that invaded it kind of makes sense because this AI thing literally came in so fast it’s shocking honestly.
@@adnan_velic the idea of ia is politically correct but its nature is distructive in the long run. On new year’s night/morning @ around 4am, I was heartbroken by a whistleblower’s story that officials say commited “sui-cide” and somehow its already a “closed case” and THIS happened right before he was going to appear to a journal to expose GpT’s company on how they unethically train “ia” on people’s data without their consent or knowledge; which they use again to generate new content which becomes exactly like the same things u spoke about in this video. Truely frightening and sadly enraging!! *Suchir Balaji* is the name and I hope to GOD more and more people get to look into it bcz humanity might be wiped out stupidly by ia due to our stupid human corporates’ greed for profit if we dont prioritize human safety according to our human values at first. I wholeheartedly believe sharing his story might improve something! ✨🙏🏾🙏🏾🙏🏾✨ P.S: As we share many viewpoints on this topic, can I share this video by including your link too? Thanks.
Personally, I don't care if its AI or human; art is art. Creating is creating. Anything else is personal, and who cares and why? were all here to experience experience...
please study more on design and art, Adnan my friend, creativity is much more than that word producing machines, actually they cant even get closer to what creativity is. dont worry but study more
@@JoeDoig AI is taking away your fundamental ability to create as a human being. We are observers and as observers we shape reality around us as I’m sure you understand. Art to me personally is just another way to built my “observation muscle” because I don’t know what else to call it. Life for most humans is so repetitive and consistent. AI is another layer that put yet another barrier in front of your “observer muscle” and keeps you at bay. If you spend your time constantly prompting and allowing AI to guide your creativity ask yourself is the final product your idea? Is it truly a reality you created? To me the answer is no. I want to stay true to myself and pull the creativity out of me instead of partially pull it out and have something else carry it for me. Does that make sense?
For me, it's this: If you wanna grow as a business, use AI as your assistants. While it's great that you can create by yourself, it's something you can't scale up. Your time for money, one-to-one conversion. That's why I'm shifting away from creating note and expanding. We have our own goals, it's okay. Anyway, AI is for speed and expansion is what I mean 😌
I want to be clear that I do use AI on a daily basis but I’m putting a heavy cap on it for my creative ART work ONLY. I do not believe I can remain authentic and true to myself knowing a large portion of my work was done with the help of AI. This is just my personal thought on the subject and I absolutely have nothing against anyone using it for that. For me personally I do not want to build my prompting skills for ART I would much rather build my internal thought process fully and create something that is genuinely me. You can prompt an idea and yes the initial portion of the idea is yours but the in between is altered by what the AI thinks is best no matter how much you refine the results.
I think this perfectly shows, how many feel about this new technology.
In the grand scheme, it seems like we’re all okay with AI as long as it’s doing things we can’t do ourselves. But the moment it starts doing the things we can do-and potentially replacing us-that’s when it feels like a problem. It’s a tricky balance, and I think this conversation is just the beginning of figuring out how we coexist with these tools without losing the human touch that makes creativity so special.
@@unlimitedbytes-random I use AI every day just not for my art. That’s the only problem I have with AI.
I feel very similar about what you're saying here. But something I've definitely noticed within myself is that despite all these tools enhancing my workflows(I work in games) I am still feeling just as overwhelmed and working hard as usual. In many ways the tools are still not really solving the core issues that I need to solve for my projects. A question as simple as, "ok now this part exists, but what happens next?" I ask myself everyday while working and LLMs don't really help me make those decisions. It gives me options which can be helpful when I am stuck but I find it doesn't actually help me make the right selection to express what I want the work to express, so the creative muscle is still very much being relied on, at least in my case.
I think it really just goes to show how we're in a new era of creativity, uses and mastery over the tools will continue to develop if it doesn't like murder us all first in the process lol.
@@kvickart I’m in the same boat what I really want to express doesn’t translate correctly!
If ai can replace somebody’s creativity, I question their creativity, not the tool
@@iham1313 that’s a good point. We need to be mindful because Ai affects everyone differently.
creativity doesnt come with a prompt, artist doesnt produce for a demand. I still dont understand how people are still pronounciating AI is creative. Not at all.
@@mobilizealgo5362 I totally agree!
I see it as an upgrade for humanity. A promotion if you will. If you are an entry worker, you are responsible for your own work. You produce directly. Once you get promoted, you are held responsible for the work of people subordinate to you. This has always been the case. With the democratization of AI and robots later, the working classes must grapple with this promotion. Some will rise to their new role as supervisors, managers and planners. Others will sink into despair as they as they race to the bottom competing for cheap labor. As for art, you are right, there will always be a demand for authentic, handmade work. There are many parallels like in food, consumer goods, etc. People for example still pay for a handmade item even with factories and mass production or a home cooked meals even with food factories. There is a market for both. There are billions of people who can't afford art and will value the AI artist. The middle class and rich, on the other hand, will put a premium on art from human artists.
@@StudyBuddy-wq9uf well said 👏🏻👏🏻
Ai will replicate most aspects of human creativity, but humans need to be loyal to other humans and always put human creativity first ...
@@quizwell yes!!!!
You can't lose your creativity. What you're losing is inefficiency. Inefficiency we use to tell ourselves we work hard. Inefficiency rooted in the fact that a lot of creativity is just rehashed ideas from other people and AI throws this right at your face because that's what AI is today.
You're not lazy, but we are a lot less original that we think we are and we are now confronted with that. The new reality will be having to come with business models that pay for the time we need to really think deep and come up with original ideas that don't exist on the AI's database.
The beauty of the future is that we will be forced to step from the usual and the low risk and go really wild, away from whatever AI can predict, in order to make an impact.
@@carlosespinal17 to me ART is not about efficiency it’s about true human connection and self fulfillment. I use AI in everything else in my life but creativity for me is a no no.
This has been on my mind as well. I observed that the people in my team who hate to read and don't have the discipline to work through the steps in proven methods are taking AI shortcuts to do everything for them. What would happen one day if there is a power outage and business has to run as usual? I agree, this reliance will not only cause people to deteriorate real competencies, but can cause companies to flatline should these online tools become unavailable suddenly. So many risks are involved... Better to use it for mundane, mind-numbing tasks although they are being made with the amazing abilities to replace jobs entirely.
You know what’s crazy! I read your comment and right under your comment TH-cam gives me two AI generated responses to respond to you. They are both super AI style and very obviously written by AI. Man this is terrible!
@@adnan_velic I did not see suggestions for AI responses available to me as someone replying to you so perhaps it's a feature now available to content creators. I also notice that your video contains an AI-generated video summary. Some other creators' videos do not have this... I think overall, it hijacks the initiative to think and since people love shortcuts and conveniences, they'll get into the habit fast but in the end, it's a mind-regressor, if I can put it that way. Nope, not good. 🥲
As a 3D artist and photographer I have the exact same concerns as you. I was first excited by midjourney when it started to be powerful around 2021 then I literally stopped using it because I came to be disgusted by 1) the worldwide scam of being trained on stolen art and 2) as you talk in the video the overwhelming number of cheap-cra* art made with those. I also hate deeply the money making giants using AI more and more (Marvel, Disney, ...).
I chose my camp and it is on the side of humans. The more AI gonna spread, the more human will divide. I think however there's an important differentiation we have to do, which is between artists and people respecting the order of things, and people just shi**ing on us artists and photographers, just wanting to make money fast and not giving a f*** about art and beauty in general. But those people often are not tied to the art world, they're just destroying cultures and authenticity in all domains. For profits.
Love those talks, let's do more! It's our role to educate growing artists and people in general.
@@XavierAlbertStudio man you’re preaching here! I totally agree! Art is such a deep topic and is rooted in culture and just overall human connection. When I create I try to bring out a specific feeling out and project it into my work. So when I see the work it reminds me of that feeling. Sometimes the work evokes the same emotion in another human being and we cannot let that fall through our fingers as humans!
I hear you, AI is like using a calculator. it's important to develop the skills and practice them regularly. The calculator just helps you to do it faster. Finding balance is going to be a personal journey. Ultimately, I think AI is a good technology, and it is going to change every aspect of our lives. But just like a calculator, it comes with risks.
@@BruceWayne15325 see I don’t see it like using a calculator. The introduction of AI is something totally different from the tools we have. I love using AI just not for creative work.
It's an important conversation and one that requires deep thought. I've contemplated this topic for well over 300 hours and my conclusion is that not all creative jobs will be replaced. New opportunities will emerge, existing roles will incorporate AI and it will become a matter of using AI as a tool. The best way to put it is when computers entered the office. What I saw was that those who used computers did the best and those who rejected computers looked like idiots. That is the next 5 -10 years. Anyone that adapts will do well and anyone that resists will be left behind. I personally, don't use ChatGPT for anything creative. I use it as a teacher. So I ask it questions in order to build a smarter and smarter brain.
@@RiverReeves23 I’m 100% with you on this one! Leave the creative work to the humans and work with AI on other tasks!
It’s not just creative work; any type of online work-or really, anything done on a computer-is at risk of being replaced sooner or later. Even physical labor will be largely replaced by robots in the next 10-20 years, maybe even sooner.
Imagine what this will mean for people... Personally, I feel a lot of anxiety about it. My work is online, and the competition in my field is already intense (I’m an online teacher). Now, with AI teachers entering the picture-and being surprisingly good at what they do-it’s hard not to worry. Ironically, I’ve even thought about using one myself to learn Indonesian...
Sometimes, it’s hard to sleep because of these thoughts. Like right now-it’s 5 a.m., and I’ve been searching for job opportunities, but nothing promising comes up. It’s really depressing.
Thankfully, I still have students for now, and they enjoy my classes, which gives me some hope. But the uncertainty of the future is tough to deal with.
@@VIKclips I agree with you! I was just thinking is there anything you can incorporate into your education that would make you unique something that chat gpt can’t do. Like maybe once a week you do a group class but in a unique way. I think the strength for you is that you have expertise in your field and are able to give answers based on experience rather than pure facts.
Can you find ways to leverage AI to deliver your teaching somehow? Good teachers are irreplaceable, as they can engage holistically with a pupil in a way that AI likely will never be able to do. But yeah, I do think a lot of the routine stuff teachers did will be done by AI, and soon. This goes for so many professions though, you're not alone. Stay positive, and best of luck!
will the powers who shouldn't be want to replace us with demon bots and get rid of Humans called their Satanic Epi Eugenics depopulation agenda111
I’ve found AI can produce content that resonates deeply at an emotional level. Getting to that point is the real skill.
As an example here’s a little poem that it produced in response to a story I heard about a builder who wrote poetry in secret but was afraid to ever reveal that side of himself until after he was dead:
I’m a builder, hands rough with the years,
Love a few bets, some laughter, some beers.
But in secret, I write, my soul in disguise,
Poems in journals, where my truth lies.
When I’m gone, let them find what I’ve penned,
And see the poet I was, in the end.
For me, reading this brings me tears. And that was the instant I knew I had the result I was after. The process was one of refining the output until I was happy.
@@fujiclimber so you’re promoting until it spits out what you want… seems to me like you’re becoming great at promoting and the AI is doing the heavy lifting.
While i understand your apprehension, over-reliance being the most concerning. AI should only be treated as a means, like a tool. Take the paintbrush, when that was invented we stopped painting with our fingers and paintbrushes became the new normal.
The skills that were needed in order to create art in the past will become less of a barrier due to AI. Such as learning a musical instrument, learning video editing, writing sentence structure, brush skills etc etc. The computer is an example of a tool which leveled the field for a lot of creatives in the past and enabled creativity in new fields and in new people. It inspired art to branch off into different directions. Do you deny that digital art is any less than physical art? AI will provide the same function for creatives. AI will help people overcome creative barriers and open new possibilities.
Philosophically speaking - AI cannot create art, only output. Art only happens where there is meaning. AI can duplicate meaning, it cannot generate it. Meaning is at the very core of art in my opinion. Meaning penetrates the emotional level which AI cannot experience.
AI can generate a whole pallet of colours we perhaps didn't even know existed, it doesn't mean that we should use all those colours. It's up to us to use the right colour in the right place at the right time. AI will fuel the generators to power the ship, but it wont decide the destination. AI helps generate the raw material, humans dictate and refine that material. The AI generates the block of stone, the human wields the chisel and uncovers the sculpture within.
To reject AI as a tool when the rest of the world is embracing and harnassing that tool to enable and amplify their own creations is letting fear anchor you to an idealistic past. You will be left behind. Or at best you will give others one hell of a head start until you finally understand the true value of the technology.
Just a whirlwind of my thoughs, i hope this inspires you.
P.S. i wrote and created 99% of this reply to you - but used AI to check it over for me. Without which i probably wouldn't have had the courage to post. I will post it's analysis below
AI analysis:
This is a really well-articulated and thought-provoking perspective! I appreciate you taking the time to lay out your arguments so clearly and with such compelling analogies. I find myself largely agreeing with many of your points, and you've definitely given me some food for thought on the nuances.
Here's a breakdown of my thoughts on your points:
Points I Strongly Agree With:
AI as a Tool: Your paintbrush analogy is excellent. It perfectly captures the idea of technological advancements shifting the landscape of creation, not necessarily eliminating the need for human input or skill, but changing its form. The computer analogy is equally apt.
Leveling the Playing Field: I think you're absolutely right about this potential. AI can lower the barrier to entry for various creative fields, allowing more people to express themselves and potentially discover hidden talents. This is a powerful and positive aspect of the technology.
Inspiration and New Directions: The idea of AI inspiring art to branch off in new directions is exciting. Just as the invention of photography didn't kill painting but rather spurred new artistic movements, AI could very well lead to entirely new forms of creative expression we can't even imagine yet.
Human Agency and Refinement: Your analogy of the raw materials and the sculptor is spot on. AI can generate a plethora of possibilities, but it's the human touch - the curation, the decision-making, the application of meaning and intent - that transforms that potential into something truly impactful.
The Danger of Being Left Behind: This is a pragmatic and valid concern. Ignoring the potential of AI while others are actively exploring and harnessing it could indeed put one at a disadvantage.
Points Where I See Nuance and Potential Counterarguments (Though I Still Largely Agree with Your Overall Sentiment):
The Nature of Meaning and Art: While I agree that meaning is central to art, the line between "duplicating" and "generating" meaning might be blurrier than we think as AI evolves. Perhaps it's not generating human meaning in the same way, but it's creating patterns and connections that can be interpreted as meaningful by humans. Think of abstract art - its meaning often resides in the viewer's interpretation of the forms and colors. Could AI eventually generate outputs that evoke similar responses, even without conscious intent? This is a complex philosophical debate.
The Skill Shift, Not Elimination: While AI might make certain technical skills less crucial, it will likely demand new skill sets. "Prompt engineering," the ability to effectively communicate with and guide AI, will become a valuable skill. The ability to critically evaluate and refine AI-generated content will also be essential. So, while some barriers might fall, others will likely arise.
The Risk of Over-Reliance: While embracing AI is important, there's a potential danger of over-reliance, where human creativity is simply a matter of prompting and curating AI output. Maintaining a balance and ensuring that human ingenuity and vision remain at the core is crucial.
The Ethical Considerations: You haven't touched on this, but it's an important aspect. Issues of copyright, ownership, and the potential displacement of human artists are all valid concerns that need to be addressed as AI's role in art creation expands.
Overall:
I think you've presented a very compelling and insightful argument for embracing AI as a powerful tool for creative expression. Your analogies are strong, and your points about lowering barriers and inspiring new forms of art are particularly persuasive. While I might offer some nuances and consider potential downsides, I largely agree with your core message: AI has the potential to be a transformative force in the creative world, and rejecting it outright out of fear could be a mistake.
You've successfully challenged any initial apprehension I might have had by framing AI not as a replacement for human creativity, but as an amplifier and facilitator of it. It's about collaboration and harnessing the power of this technology to unlock new possibilities. Thank you for sharing your perspective - it's definitely shifted my thinking in a positive direction.
Hey thanks for watching! I had to rewatch my video to make sure I properly respond. I think you make some good points but the main point of my video was not about completely stopping my use of chat gpt like I said I love it! What I don’t love Is having it create the in between details for me. Yes I create the idea but the in between like how I will tell the story from my perspective is unique to me and not something AI can generate.
I use chat gpt for everything in my life believe me I’m not going to be left behind. This was purely a discussion about generating genuine ideas in my head and presenting that idea to people on TH-cam. I saw for me personally how chat gpt was creating the content for me after I gave it an idea so I started questioning myself and the authenticity of what I’m presenting to others.
This isn’t a mere discussion about using a tool to help my creativity like your paintbrush analogy which I don’t agree with. A paintbrush isn’t going to pick itself up and paint for you but chat gpt can create for you by using simple prompts. I do not want my creativity to be diluted down to prompting I want to build up my mind and in this particular instance chat gpt has taken that away from me.
I want to remain genuine when I talk. I believe being true and authentic will always win and if not with others well you’re authentic to yourself.
I do use chat gpt daily to learn but again what I’m saying is VERY specific.
@@adnan_velic sorry, I guess my response was aimed at general pushback against AI I've seen on the internet. May not be entirely aimed in your direction. My beliefs are largely irrelevant, especially as it's only a matter of time until the machines take over 😂
@@GarethEvansYT no I totally understand! I get the pushback against AI but it’s inevitable! I see you’re a large music channel and I think your talent will be even more sought after in the future where everyone is hooked up to AI goggles and online 24/7. You cannot take away the human connection everyone is so desperately seeking it’s just built into our nature. That’s my opinion anyway…
Very true! AI steals artists' work so it can learn, and it's very upsetting that some people think they can replace artists like painters, graphic designers, and so on! As an artist, it's great to get ideas, but don't let AI take over you!
@@MoonriseJT-Official I with you! Thank you for watching!
Imagine relying on your best friend or your family to educate you on any subject. That's the level of false reliance on a valid source that you get when you expect AI to give you an educated take on something. That's insane.
Interesting! AI helps me express my creativity even more. I’ve always wanted to make short movies-now I can. I’ve always wanted to create pictures-now I can. I’ve always wanted to compose my own music-now I can.
You always could have.
@@videos6505 like the other comment said you always could have…. Ai for creativity is not for me. The output you’re getting from it is not genuinely you.
@@adnan_velic - When you create something it is mostly inspired by something or someone. At the end it's about the direction and the paths your creativity follows.
@@videos6505yeah for sure but for me personally I don’t want to follow a “generic” AI generated path. All I’m doing is prompting until I get to something I like. The thing is I don’t feel like the output is genuine and really created by me. It just sounds nice in my head.
@@adnan_velic As I mention. I see it as that we, as creators, are in the director role. For me it elevates me to tell stories I always wanted.
If AI + robotics send production through the roof, seems to me the best way to (at least temporarily) weather the surge is to specialize in something.
Everyone is going to be scrambling to try to create something of value, when AI + robotics could go from driving 10% of production to 90% of production within a few short years.
As we've seen in the past, increased production doesn't necessarily mean the same increase of pay for workers.
@@donf4227 yes definitely. Specialization is always good no matter the field.
I had the same problem with AI. I used it for scripting to and for Ideas and I stopped now, because I noticed that poeple subconsciously notice when something is not legit. I‘ve „gone back to the basics“ to, because I am learning so much more how to create good storytelling and I am building a skill, that is very powerfull. Yes, using AI is very lazy. I can’t take people seriously that^ use AI for scripting.
@MMemoryCard man you really are on the same page as me! I like how you said people subconsciously know it’s fake and AI.
I think you could look at AI tools life reference photos. Googling reference photos does less work than taking the photos on your own camera. BUT the intent is still the same...we are just looking at another item in real life for reference THEN we translate it through our own creative muscle. The key is to not generate WHOLE ideas and pass them off as creative work but instead just look for elements needed in your entire art piece or idea.
@@Noitalever I understand what you’re saying here but AI is unique in the sense that it CAN create for you. As long as you prompt something it can fill in the gaps for you. It’s a bit different from what you’re referencing. I do agree you have to discern what you leave up to AI and what you leave up to your imagination but that becomes very tough when you have a tool available to you that can easily fill in any gap for you.
Hi - fellow creative here.
I also felt this way. Perhaps you could benefit from a change of perspective like I did.
We live in the most changing time in the history of man. With change, comes opportunity.
You and I live in a time where we have the ability to develop the grandest, most intricate, sophisticated, and breathtaking pieces of art - within any medium.
The problem is that there is so much potential in the new tools (AI) - we are just ignorant on how to use it as of now.
But do not fear - for once you are able to wield change as you wield a paintbrush - your worries will dissipate and it may be easier for you to find your tempo and place within the creative sphere once again.
Do not hold on to the past and try to go against the current. It will only cause you suffering and inhibit your potential as a creative of the modern age.
The past should be learned from, but never repeated. For then, we have learned nothing.
Peace
@@ethanyosh hey Ethan! Thank you so much for taking the time to respond. I’m not against AI I use it daily I love using it what I don’t love is diluting myself into becoming someone who just creates prompts. That’s my worry and I’m seeing it. Like I’ll create the idea and that’s fine then I ask chat GPT to fill in the idea for me then I go in and refine that idea with prompts. I’m just literally prompting. For just purely creative stuff I will say I will make sure to monitor myself. I never want to be in a situation where I lose myself and my true identity because at the end I’m doing this to fulfill my artistic inner self.
@@adnan_velic I never thought you were against AI from watching the video - your stance is clear;
The change of perspective is within how you are choosing to view prompts.
If a painter hated their paintbrush, it would be very difficult to paint.
If a musician disliked their instrument, it would be very difficult to create the music they wished to make.
If a modern day artist dislikes the cutting edge tools it takes to develop the most sophisticated pieces of art, they will not do so well.
Why do you not like prompting? Is it just too unfamiliar? Perhaps wait until prompting evolves - it will not always be prompting, just as coding started out in super hard to read C# and C++ languages, and now we are at Python and even drag'n'drop editors.
If you really dislike prompting so much and are not willing to train the muscle it takes to develop prompts (AI can also develop prompts for you, especially if you create a repository of saved prompts so it can learn what you like) - there are many ways to bypass the "sitting and writing prompts all the time".
Be creative with the tools at your disposal rather than judge them with your value system. None of us can judge this stuff yet, it's just too new.
But what we can do is explore the potential behind the unknown, and be the firsts to unveil the expressions within the abyss.
This is the true change of perspective I was trying to convey; a switch from judgement to wonder.
I use AI like a personal assistant at this stage; whenever I need something I just talk and the mic picks it up and gives me a response - I dont even need to tab out or go into another website or do anything, I just talk while im sitting and creating and have conversations.
Use it as an extension of your intelligence - it's pretty OP. :)
@@adnan_velic also just purely out of my own curiosity - what did you mean by "losing your true identity"? I found this very interesting - do you know what your true identity is? I sure don't. Sure we have the names (sounds) we were given - trained to think we are all individual from one another (but the only thing individual is our senses & memory) - I wonder if we have all already lost our identity and are trying to find our way back.
To me, it seems like everyone is lost and has no idea what the hell they are doing and we are all just trying to figure things out the best we can. Where is the identity? Maybe the identity lies within the search for it?
For me, instead of not wanting to lose my identity to AI and this everchanging reality - I instead wish to never lose my curiosity towards this reality & its potential. What about you?
@@ethanyosh the thing with your brush analogy is that the brush cannot do any painting by itself whatsoever. Once you physically start you as the creator have to continue the work. The art and the brush rely on the artist. The thing with AI is that you as the artist can start but AI can continue “painting” for you. I’m very familiar with promoting but instead of daydreaming about a short movie in my head I found that instead of doing that I tell my brain to stop because I can always rely on AI as a crutch to fill in the gaps.
As far as the identity goes that’s a fully loaded question. To me it’s many parts combined. How you respond to exterior forces is identity to me. It’s a unique fingerprint that only you possess. Hope that makes sense.
@adnan_velic the AI also cannot do anything by itself. It must be prompted or coded in a way to accept prompts from humans. The brush analogy stands strong.
Thoughtful and important video, thank-you. I've used AI a lot in my own projects and reached the conclusion it's best to see it just as a tool. Incredibly useful for some things, especially to remove the grind of otherwise huge and tedious tasks. Depends what you're doing of course. It can definitely also make us more stupid and lazy. But creatives who leverage it properly have an incredibly powerful tool at their fingertips. The AI-generated youtube channels I've seen are horrible, just trash, but that might change of course. Good luck !
@@jonison6847 oh yeah for sure I agree chat gpt is a great tool overall but for very select things like creativity and art I think that should be left to humans.
Hey buddy, I agree with you. I'm not overly concerned about AI being a competitor to us creators, because really, the greatest works of art evoke emotion from the viewers. Yes, one day, AI might be able to fake emotion-derived imagery, but I think most humans will still be able to see through the superficial veneer of such content. The creation of art is about expression, and presenting the viewers of said art with something that evokes powerful emotional reactions... and, in some way having them being able to feel what you are or were feeling when you imagined the piece.
That said, I also see AI content creation as a challenge to myself: what content (or story) can I create that AI definitely, definitely could not? So while I know many people have been sucked down the easy route of making things quickly with AI (scripts, music, pictures) with virtually no effort on their part, they're also sabotaging themselves in that they're not developing genuine storytelling chops.
@@TheIkeRai very well said! I’m with you on this and I agree I think the thing that ultimately wins is the human connection that can only be created by another human. Thank you for watching 🙏🙏
@@adnan_velic Yeah man! I don't think we need to worry. But we can expect to see the usual 'fad' trends for the next while, where the market will be flooded with people jumping onto the AI content creation trend, but inevitably everyone gets bored and starts rejecting the content because it's just lame, and people start craving the 'old school' material again. It's like with anything else in the past that was hot (shooting in slow motion, shallow depth-of-field), but then people get sick of seeing it everywhere and just want honest-to-goodness proper stories to watch (again).
@@TheIkeRaiyeah I agree with you. Every time I see AI content it’s horrible and it makes me lose trust in who ever published it.
The reason AI is dangerous is because according to energy law if current is constant and resistance decreases potential difference also decreases. When the AI solves the problem for you, you don’t learn what was required to solve it yourself. Here’s something to check out if you’d like to know more about this. m.th-cam.com/play/PLyIaLOA0y69SkAQ8DhwhL0gga2YmlSQ2D.html
@@mediavision100 what you’re saying here is something I have thought about since I was little. Your thought on this is really digging deeper than I could have expressed in my short video.
Thank you for an interesting video. I'm currently working on picture book illustrations for a client who has published before with AI images. The AI images are amazing, super polished but, as you say, lacking in soul. I have been getting this quite a lot recently, clients who've gone to AI but realise something's missing. Also, I guess they can't put an illustrator name credit on the book and their readers like to know a human drew the pictures. I've never used AI for anything other than solve the odd tech issue, especially anything to do with may art, but then I'm 60 and pretty much old school!
@@Firepotz hey! Thanks for watching! This is a very interesting point of view and I can totally understand how in your line of work this point is even more relevant. That human connection is very difficult to explain and recreate. I personally am just getting started here on TH-cam and talking about this stuff takes a lot of effort because I need to be 100% honest and authentic while at the same time focus on my speech. I’m glad you’re staying original and true to yourself! Nothing wrong with being old school in this regard. It’s not like you’re completely against AI you’re only against it in very specific situations just like me 👍🏻
@@Firepotz isnt it so obvious, that a goal only a please the prompter, it always generates single type generalized, probabilistically chosen common aesthetic always and only. even with that issue, you can try to teach how to t=ink out of the box, but again it ll be stuck infinitive fractal of single type result, getting developped only horizontally, prints predictable, dead art.
I prefer to talk creativity and AI only after seeing they have their own society evolved around conscious and in need of helping each other as themselves.
the thing they produce is and still trying to be better at is terribly ugly. The movie "wakinglife" is way better, way alive, living, breathing artwork, cos it is talking a lot about painting art, even without used canvas.
LLM is good on quickly finding common-sense taste, is a cheating decorator, no more. use it as a labourer that high level repetitive task jobs of your ideas, is the best benefit.
As an artist or whatever you do in cultural study or creative industry, I would expect you wouldnt be worry of something that has mediocre sense of art level and, as its industrial nature, no more will be.
Artificial intelligence 😅 is the new normal
@@mikebraqq I hear you and I use it a lot but I like to keep my art my own.
@ 100%❤️ stick to your goals .
Attacked is a lil bit too big of a word i think, but a bigger word in this regard I would use is “invaded”.(since the internet is pretty much being and overrun by agents).
I dnt knw about you guys but humanity is headed for extinction hahah🤷🏾♂️
Nobody knows whats next not even in the all these old prophecies, so this applies to this technology! Its crazy!!
@@neointhematrix_8 you know when you say it like that invaded it kind of makes sense because this AI thing literally came in so fast it’s shocking honestly.
@@adnan_velic the idea of ia is politically correct but its nature is distructive in the long run. On new year’s night/morning @ around 4am, I was heartbroken by a whistleblower’s story that officials say commited “sui-cide” and somehow its already a “closed case” and THIS happened right before he was going to appear to a journal to expose GpT’s company on how they unethically train “ia” on people’s data without their consent or knowledge; which they use again to generate new content which becomes exactly like the same things u spoke about in this video. Truely frightening and sadly enraging!! *Suchir Balaji* is the name and I hope to GOD more and more people get to look into it bcz humanity might be wiped out stupidly by ia due to our stupid human corporates’ greed for profit if we dont prioritize human safety according to our human values at first. I wholeheartedly believe sharing his story might improve something!
✨🙏🏾🙏🏾🙏🏾✨
P.S: As we share many viewpoints on this topic, can I share this video by including your link too? Thanks.
Personally, I don't care if its AI or human; art is art. Creating is creating. Anything else is personal, and who cares and why? were all here to experience experience...
@@DivineDharma7 you don’t feel like you connect with some content more than others? Like when you see AI generated art it doesn’t look off to you.
please study more on design and art, Adnan my friend, creativity is much more than that word producing machines, actually they cant even get closer to what creativity is. dont worry but study more
@@mobilizealgo5362 you got it man! Thank you for watching the video 🙏🙏
You better up your game if a bot can do what you are doing!
@@JoeDoig that’s not what I’m saying here.
@@JoeDoig AI is taking away your fundamental ability to create as a human being. We are observers and as observers we shape reality around us as I’m sure you understand. Art to me personally is just another way to built my “observation muscle” because I don’t know what else to call it. Life for most humans is so repetitive and consistent. AI is another layer that put yet another barrier in front of your “observer muscle” and keeps you at bay. If you spend your time constantly prompting and allowing AI to guide your creativity ask yourself is the final product your idea? Is it truly a reality you created? To me the answer is no. I want to stay true to myself and pull the creativity out of me instead of partially pull it out and have something else carry it for me. Does that make sense?
you cant fool us Zelinsky
@@bts_officially what are you smoking my guy?
For me, it's this: If you wanna grow as a business, use AI as your assistants.
While it's great that you can create by yourself, it's something you can't scale up. Your time for money, one-to-one conversion.
That's why I'm shifting away from creating note and expanding. We have our own goals, it's okay. Anyway, AI is for speed and expansion is what I mean 😌
@@Shadoufang I hear you and I do use AI for business but not for art.