I am so glad you posted this as I just saw his video and thought it was lacking. I went to post something, nicely, under his video mentioning the role of fats in diabetes and I cannot find my post. I think I will try one more time. If it's gone again I will know he is purposely misleading people.
He’s overly confident about what he thinks he knows. He seems to have absorbed too much of the low-carb propaganda. I agree that his heart in the right place. I think you’re spot-on here. I hope Dr. D sees this. He’s a good man but needs further education on nutrition, and to work from first principles instead of absorbing low-carb disinformation.
Yes! The major talking points out there are Only about decreasing Processed Foods! They aren’t going to touch on the effects eating animals has on our health in my opinion. I.e. they are Ignoring the Elephant in the room. Like suggesting making French fries with Beef Tallow. 👀
Agree completely. Walter Kempler reversed T2 by feeding a diet of white rice and sugar over 50 years ago as Dr. McDougall talked about many times. His heart is in the right place though calling out the medical industrial complex for what it is.
Yes. That'w why there is hope for him. It seems that he actually wants to help the proles. He just needs to read more nutrition and medical papers. He is woefullly ignorant
Until I encountered Dr. Rogers' vids on the subject of Type 2 diabetes, I thought diabetes was caused by eating a lot of carbs, in general. Now, I understand that Type 2 diabetes is caused by too much dietary fat. This is a revolution in my thinking. Now that i understand that fact, I can diabetes-proof myself and my family. Grateful.
He's telling people what they want to hear. He's presenting the 'alternative' viewpoint that is the one that gets millions of views and will make him a fortune.
My first impression of him was that he was sincere and was trying to help people.But then I saw him peddling supplements so I assumed he is just another con man charlatan
I mainly listen to him because he's very spot-on about the medical system in general and I am glad he is informing the public about the way the medical system really operates so that we can make informed decisions. That's what I mainly listen to him for. He's in the right place as far as not consuming toxic processed junk food but I know he tends to favor a low-carb diet which I don't agree with him on. I think it would be great if you two could do a debate and perhaps you could convince him of why a WFPB diet is the only way to eat.
I have far more knowledge than he does. No comparison. However, he is seen a "safe" to promote on you tube, so he gets thousands of times more views than me. If suggested to interview me, he would probably say to himself, why show the audience someone so much smarter & knowledgable than him, who might steal his audience, or make him look ignorant. That's another one of the reasons I seldom get interviewed. He has nothing to gain from it, except to learn more. And he can learn more by just watching my videos.
@PeterRogersMD yes very true indeed. I think he might sell supplements too. Your channel is so unique. You're close to 10,000 subscribers! That says alot about your content and especially for someone who's just doing it as a hobby.
@@laurieharnicker5451 My channel is the best health channel on the internet. I just don't have time to market it. There's no lying, no promotion of supplements or commercial foods. No sponsors. It's not monetized.
@@PeterRogersMDbut in China most of the time there was poverty, so if you say they ate rice then most of the days in a year they had to starve themselves because of lack of food of any sort, that is why is China they ate lot of pork because they got lot of fat that could be used as energy for the body during starvation time and during winters, by the way cultivable land in China is very less.
Dhand mainly rails against processed foods. You're right about high carbs, but they must be whole foods AND the fat content of the diet must be low. You can keep insulin and blood sugar under control by one of two ways: Low fat (< 10% of calories from fat) OR low carbs (< 100 g, maybe even < 50 g carbs per day). The former actually results in the body healing and after a few months you can add more fat. The latter is something you have to continue for life and most people find it very difficult. To me it's a no brainer, go for the low fat and after a few months you can start adding more fat to the diet. Name calling causes a knee jerk reaction in me, and I react by calling the name caller names. No excuse for it I know.
Maybe the doc is keeping up with the latest research, not some history references. 1. White rice consumption and risk of type 2 diabetes: meta-analysis and systematic review (BMJ, 2012) This meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies found that for each serving per day increment of white rice intake, the relative risk of type 2 diabetes was 1.11 (95% CI: 1.08 to 1.14). The study highlighted that higher consumption of white rice is associated with a significantly increased risk of type 2 diabetes, especially in Asian populations. 2. White rice, brown rice and the risk of type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis (BMJ Open, 2022) This systematic review and meta-analysis found that white rice consumption was associated with a higher risk of type 2 diabetes. Specifically, at intakes above ~300 g/day, a dose-response was observed, with each 158 g/day serving associated with a 13% higher risk of type 2 diabetes (95% CI: 11% to 15%).
Link to Dr Dhand's ignorant lecture on diabetes th-cam.com/video/SfmQLDDQqNU/w-d-xo.htmlsi=huBKW5Tz8KDiIJav
I am so glad you posted this as I just saw his video and thought it was lacking. I went to post something, nicely, under his video mentioning the role of fats in diabetes and I cannot find my post. I think I will try one more time. If it's gone again I will know he is purposely misleading people.
So glad you presented this one.
I disagreed with him when I heard that video, I knew it was wrong because I already knew the truth from studying Dr. McDougall!!
He’s overly confident about what he thinks he knows. He seems to have absorbed too much of the low-carb propaganda. I agree that his heart in the right place. I think you’re spot-on here. I hope Dr. D sees this. He’s a good man but needs further education on nutrition, and to work from first principles instead of absorbing low-carb disinformation.
Thank You Good Dr Peter
Yes! The major talking points out there are Only about decreasing Processed Foods! They aren’t going to touch on the effects eating animals has on our health in my opinion.
I.e. they are Ignoring the Elephant in the room. Like suggesting making French fries with Beef Tallow. 👀
Agree completely. Walter Kempler reversed T2 by feeding a diet of white rice and sugar over 50 years ago as Dr. McDougall talked about many times. His heart is in the right place though calling out the medical industrial complex for what it is.
Diabetes diet
His heart is in the right place. He is very upset with the current medical system...
Yes. That'w why there is hope for him. It seems that he actually wants to help the proles. He just needs to read more nutrition and medical papers. He is woefullly ignorant
I only trust those who aren't worried about making friends, or enemies. Dr Rogers is most trustworthy:^)
He raises cane against the medical system, but that's about it
The time he overdosed on cashews was amazing
Who overdosed on cashews? And what happened?
Until I encountered Dr. Rogers' vids on the subject of Type 2 diabetes, I thought diabetes was caused by eating a lot of carbs, in general. Now, I understand that Type 2 diabetes is caused by too much dietary fat. This is a revolution in my thinking. Now that i understand that fact, I can diabetes-proof myself and my family. Grateful.
Thanks!
He's telling people what they want to hear. He's presenting the 'alternative' viewpoint that is the one that gets millions of views and will make him a fortune.
Speak nonsense & the video gets promoted. Tell the truth, and the video gets shaadow baanned.
He's pretty dumb about a lot of other things too.
100 percent correct. He also never talks directly about virtually anything.
I followed him until he talked up how great eggs are for a person.
He doesn't know what he's talking about. He's so ignorant, that he doesn't know he is ignorant
My first impression of him was that he was sincere and was trying to help people.But then I saw him peddling supplements so I assumed he is just another con man charlatan
I mainly listen to him because he's very spot-on about the medical system in general and I am glad he is informing the public about the way the medical system really operates so that we can make informed decisions. That's what I mainly listen to him for. He's in the right place as far as not consuming toxic processed junk food but I know he tends to favor a low-carb diet which I don't agree with him on. I think it would be great if you two could do a debate and perhaps you could convince him of why a WFPB diet is the only way to eat.
I have far more knowledge than he does. No comparison. However, he is seen a "safe" to promote on you tube, so he gets thousands of times more views than me. If suggested to interview me, he would probably say to himself, why show the audience someone so much smarter & knowledgable than him, who might steal his audience, or make him look ignorant. That's another one of the reasons I seldom get interviewed. He has nothing to gain from it, except to learn more. And he can learn more by just watching my videos.
@PeterRogersMD yes very true indeed. I think he might sell supplements too. Your channel is so unique. You're close to 10,000 subscribers! That says alot about your content and especially for someone who's just doing it as a hobby.
@@laurieharnicker5451 My channel is the best health channel on the internet. I just don't have time to market it. There's no lying, no promotion of supplements or commercial foods. No sponsors. It's not monetized.
@@PeterRogersMDbut in China most of the time there was poverty, so if you say they ate rice then most of the days in a year they had to starve themselves because of lack of food of any sort, that is why is China they ate lot of pork because they got lot of fat that could be used as energy for the body during starvation time and during winters, by the way cultivable land in China is very less.
So eat a lot of sugar and carbs then try to burn it off with a bunch of cardio . What a dumb way to eat.
Starch eaters don't get type 2 diabetes
@ Yes they do lol 😆
@@SpikeFastingRacing No they don't
From what I've heard, it's pronounced: "Dahnd".
Dhand mainly rails against processed foods. You're right about high carbs, but they must be whole foods AND the fat content of the diet must be low. You can keep insulin and blood sugar under control by one of two ways: Low fat (< 10% of calories from fat) OR low carbs (< 100 g, maybe even < 50 g carbs per day). The former actually results in the body healing and after a few months you can add more fat. The latter is something you have to continue for life and most people find it very difficult. To me it's a no brainer, go for the low fat and after a few months you can start adding more fat to the diet.
Name calling causes a knee jerk reaction in me, and I react by calling the name caller names. No excuse for it I know.
have a debate with bart kay on carbohydrates :)
Bart Kay is a phony. He's built like a pregnant female.
@PeterRogersMD what credentials do you have ?
@@macatak275 Credentials don’t matter
@@SpikeFastingRacing to who ?
@@macatak275 Peter Rogers has many credentials and still pushing the wrong diet 😑
Hahahahahahahahaha
Maybe the doc is keeping up with the latest research, not some history references.
1. White rice consumption and risk of type 2 diabetes: meta-analysis and systematic review (BMJ, 2012)
This meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies found that for each serving per day increment of white rice intake, the relative risk of type 2 diabetes was 1.11 (95% CI: 1.08 to 1.14). The study highlighted that higher consumption of white rice is associated with a significantly increased risk of type 2 diabetes, especially in Asian populations.
2. White rice, brown rice and the risk of type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis (BMJ Open, 2022)
This systematic review and meta-analysis found that white rice consumption was associated with a higher risk of type 2 diabetes. Specifically, at intakes above ~300 g/day, a dose-response was observed, with each 158 g/day serving associated with a 13% higher risk of type 2 diabetes (95% CI: 11% to 15%).
I'll give you credit. Your whip and buggy joke the other day about my list of vegan world truth tellers was good.