Logic Statement for Transit Lane

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 18 ก.ย. 2024
  • I have created a logic statement that will allow for transit lanes to get a green interval before the main street vehicle traffic.

ความคิดเห็น • 15

  • @jtStracuse8
    @jtStracuse8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I am the traffic signals crew leader in Syracuse NY where Crouse Hindes is located. We still have a couple PCE'S in operation

  • @Petru.S
    @Petru.S ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks for sharing! Didn't realize from the engineering/planning perspective how much went into a standard LTI/LBI

    • @trafficsignalstraining7673
      @trafficsignalstraining7673  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It’s true…. It can be a lot of work!
      My words of wisdom to engineers: “just because you can do something doesn’t mean you should do it “.

    • @Petru.S
      @Petru.S ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@trafficsignalstraining7673 Yup, though I assumed LPIs were pretty easy to set up with the “delayed green” function, so for some reason I assumed the same for Leading Bicycle intervals as well.
      Slightly off topic, but I’d love to see a video about blank out (part time restriction) signs and how they work in a controller. I’m starting to consider them more with exclusive pedestrian phases and at other signals.

    • @trafficsignalstraining7673
      @trafficsignalstraining7673  ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Petru.S I have one video, although it just shows the blankout sign in action. it doesn't show the controller side, but we are driving it with an overlap green that serves when a specific crosswalk is active. Here it is... th-cam.com/video/dVVOj0oVfWo/w-d-xo.html

  • @TheTrafficTech
    @TheTrafficTech ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very cool! We don’t have any transit corridors on the intersections I maintain but I’ll have to go over some of the many logic statements I’ve implemented at our more complex intersections!
    Great video as always!

  • @trafficsignalstraining7673
    @trafficsignalstraining7673  ปีที่แล้ว

    I forgot to mention that phase 9 is in ring 3

  • @EngMadison
    @EngMadison ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The flashing triangle interval isn't required per the MUTCD...or at least it allows you to use some engineering judgement. I read that and we determined we were not going to flash the triangle...seemed like a massive headache.

    • @Petru.S
      @Petru.S ปีที่แล้ว +1

      That’s what I determined as well. Seems so difficult to program for little benefit

    • @trafficsignalstraining7673
      @trafficsignalstraining7673  ปีที่แล้ว

      It seems pretty clear in 8-C3 is there any more verbiage that has a variance on this? mutcd.fhwa.dot.gov/htm/2009/part8/fig8c_03_longdesc.htm

    • @trafficsignalstraining7673
      @trafficsignalstraining7673  ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@Petru.S Not too hard on an econolite EOS. It's just a setting per phase for LRT.

    • @EngMadison
      @EngMadison ปีที่แล้ว

      @Traffic Signals Training technically, this is for light rail. I think we found examples of other cities using solid triangle. But I'd have to look through my notes and our justification document.
      IMO, I'm not sure what a flashing triangle does. I can see flashing the vertical for a 2 section configuration, but not a 3 section.
      Plus, a flashing yellow means something else, and that's essentially what this is. I think it's one of those cases where someone overthought it.

    • @Petru.S
      @Petru.S ปีที่แล้ว

      @@trafficsignalstraining7673 good to know