@@jakemensik2842 They are not going to because they are not in for the money rather they want to make quality high end products for the more professional audience. MSFS is a game, not a simulator, and people who actually want realistic flight models, systems, and open-source freedom will stay with X-Plane. Take the Hotstart challenger for example. No plane is ever going to beat that level of accuracy and system depth in any flight simulator in the near future.
@@CaptainStandiford XP will not die because it is the only flight sim certified for training and professional use and is used in professional simulators and the only sim that can be both FAA and EASA certified it has also been used by some aircraft manufactures to test some design choices in a virtual environment. Also what is the point in wishing the competition to die ? the only reason we got FS2020 and are now getting 2024 is because for the longest time XP was the only sim being regularly updated and that was not technically a military training tool like Lockheed Martin P3D which was essentially modified FSX since MS killed Flight Sim after FSX. MS saw there was still a huge market and decided to bring MSFS back.
@@jakemensik2842 xplane will not die it has a community that is very passionate about the game and it’s an awesome game. It will not die and msfs will not kill it
@@Nonavation Headwind won't change the flight model though, which feels terrible and far from realistic. But this tbf is an issue with almost every larger aircraft in MSFS
When it comes to textures yes, they are not great, but systemwise this is indeed the best a330 that exists on any flight simulator at the moment. I am very curious to see how good the inibuilds a330 in msfs2024 will be, even though probably it is not going to be as detailed as this cause it is made to be a default aircraft, but i'm sure it's gonna be better than the aerosoft a330, which sadly doesn't even simulate correctly all the basic features that will make a flight from A to B possible.
MSFS has horrendous flight dynamics. And a disastrous Aerosoft A330. It’s a sim more for gamers only interested in textures resolution rather than anything else (becausw it‘s the only thing they seem to care of). If 90$ is too much for you for such a high-fidelity system simulation of the A330 you must be very broke.
@@angelicguru4066 yes, it is too much and i’m sure it is the same for everyone. one bad aircraft doesn’t mean the whole game is bad. msfs 2024 is the best simulator this year and that is the truth. more people play msfs over x plane and we all know why, because of the arcadey ahh graphica
Hey, swiss001 do you know what time of year it is, right, Microsoft Flight Simulator 2024 is around the corner. So that is why they are so many ultra realistic airliners.
Not really. It’s 83€ on the org. But if you are just looking for perfect cockpit textures and don’t value the hard work put into the almost perfect systems and flight dynamics it may simply just not be for you. Or you are very poor. Or both lol.
@@frankbyte Very poor? Are you being serious right now? The base game costs 80 bucks, semi good sim hardware costs $300+, and you're calling me "very poor" because I don't think a single aircraft is worth a hundred bucks? Not even full fidelity DCS modules cost that much and they're of higher quality.
@@ImNotQualifiedToSayThisBut lol, yes you are simply broke, just admit it. It‘s not even worth mentionning knowing 1h in a level D sim costs 250€. For only 1h! And they developped that plane with very acurate and almost complete systems that real Airbus pilots find very good. It’s a joke how little we have to pay nowadays to get such high systems-fidelity.
Yeah...XP is done for me lol. Those cockpit textures are HORRID! And before the "It'S XpLaNe, It'S NoT SuPpOsEd To LoOk PrEtTy", yeah I get that but the new MSFS 2024 physics are going to pretty much kill X-plane. Combine and graphics of MSFS 2020 and the physics of XP and you get MSFS24, what more do you want?
Agreed brother, x-plane is the only simulator where you can do a long flight without your sim crashing Which is probably why most long haul aircraft devs use X-Plane
@@MSDAviation_idk what your talking about. I haven’t had a single crash of fs2020 for over 2 years knock on wood. In xplane I used to get it about every 2 flights. Instability is what steered me away from xplane
X-Plane can run in Windows, Mac and Linux and Laminar is working on new scenery engine. X-Plane is not going anywhere no matter how much MS fanbois wish it.
@@majoraviatior1611 the only crashes I’ve had since XP12 were caused by autoortho but is mostly fixed now. MSFS I had dozens of crashes for over a year after it first released and then started having them again after a recent SU
100 euros for this ? What is the great feature in this plane that worths 100 euros ? Like, just the systems ? Yeah, they are great, but for 100 euros ?? You as a normal personal are going to use this addon to your A330 TR or something that justifies it? I know that nobody does that but let’s just pretend that none addon worths 100 euros when you only have a good simulation system but the rest of the airplane is fucked up. We don’t even have a proper wing flex, not to even mention the modeling and graphics of this plane… Jesus
The wing flex is adjustable so he possibly had it on the lowest setting. And what is it with people moaning about textures? Is it Fenix level? No, but why should it be? And if you read the forums people do actually use this for TR training
@@tomstravels520 why not to be at Fenix or iFly level? If you for instance complain about the Aerosoft/CaptainScam for having bad simulated systems, why then it should have? Demanding decent graphics and sounds when you are paying 100 euros is not an absurd, but what every product should have. This is not free yo. Imagine if now every sim dev does what ToLiss does… we would be still in the 2005 of the flight sim with this mediocre mentality
@@stlucia-b7u you seriously expect the same graphics as Fenix or iFly…….addons that don’t run natively and require their own program to function ….. would you like their FPS rate as well? Or are you gifted with an RTX4090 so it’s no issue even at 8K? We’re talking about 2 different simulators here, of course the graphics are going to be different. Do you think the Aerosoft A330 is a good plane because of the level of cockpit textures? And I don’t complain about Captain Sim because I wasn’t suckered into buying it
@@tomstravels520 my point is about the price only. If the plane was 40 euros for example, it would worth maybe. But for 100 euros??? No way… You don’t need a RTX4090 to run X-Plane 12. And fyi MSFS2020 is way more optimized and less consuming power than X-Plane 12. Anyways, it’s just our opinion in the end of the day, it won’t change anything. Cheers bro!
@@stlucia-b7u no but you need an RTX4090 to run MSFS2020 and the Fenix and something like JFK or LHR at 60fps. And it is absolutely not less power consuming. I have a smart meter at home that runs higher when MSFS2020 is being used
![[UNCUT] บอสพอล แผลงฤทธิ์ บอสพระ-นักร้อง ก. โดนแฉยับ! I คนดังนั่งเคลียร์ I 21 ต.ค. 67](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/XKf6HeftoPI/mqdefault.jpg)
We now have the most realistic Airbus a330 and the most realistic 777. What a time to be a xplane user
@@jakemensik2842 How do you know if they will move to msfs lol.
@@jakemensik2842 They are not going to because they are not in for the money rather they want to make quality high end products for the more professional audience. MSFS is a game, not a simulator, and people who actually want realistic flight models, systems, and open-source freedom will stay with X-Plane. Take the Hotstart challenger for example. No plane is ever going to beat that level of accuracy and system depth in any flight simulator in the near future.
@@BobTheBucket Because msfs will be the only good simulator if X-plane dies.
@@CaptainStandiford XP will not die because it is the only flight sim certified for training and professional use and is used in professional simulators and the only sim that can be both FAA and EASA certified it has also been used by some aircraft manufactures to test some design choices in a virtual environment. Also what is the point in wishing the competition to die ? the only reason we got FS2020 and are now getting 2024 is because for the longest time XP was the only sim being regularly updated and that was not technically a military training tool like Lockheed Martin P3D which was essentially modified FSX since MS killed Flight Sim after FSX. MS saw there was still a huge market and decided to bring MSFS back.
@@jakemensik2842 xplane will not die it has a community that is very passionate about the game and it’s an awesome game. It will not die and msfs will not kill it
0:00 I thought for a second I went to the wrong tube
The start of the video 😭
What are those groans 💀💀
Bro came
DreamySwissxx1 💀
orgasm
Nahh💀
@@Kuro-mg8vc bro what
10:37 "then, we can FLUSH" 😂
Better than the aerosoft one from last week?
Try making the airbus beluga extra wide and long 😂
edit: 6:13 plane ges BOINGG
7:47 That was an Aerosucre Takeoff 😆💀
ToLiss A330 is stunning and phenomenal.Take notes Aerosoft 💀💀💀
W video tho
New Editor Vibes
Hey Aerosoft, eat your heart out with this one!
You missed quite a few features, like the HUD and overrun protection. They can be turned on via the ISCS
Love toliss!! still surprised they didn’t update the graphics
9:03 thats pure laughing stock man i wanna die 😂😂😂
Headwind forever 🙌🏻
Literally the goat
@@dominicstewart1941 fr
Headwind is utter dog shit compared to this
@@Orovcol Considering the price and overall. If headwin change the cockpit it will be perfect.
@@Nonavation Headwind won't change the flight model though, which feels terrible and far from realistic. But this tbf is an issue with almost every larger aircraft in MSFS
3:42 accurate lmao
When it comes to textures yes, they are not great, but systemwise this is indeed the best a330 that exists on any flight simulator at the moment. I am very curious to see how good the inibuilds a330 in msfs2024 will be, even though probably it is not going to be as detailed as this cause it is made to be a default aircraft, but i'm sure it's gonna be better than the aerosoft a330, which sadly doesn't even simulate correctly all the basic features that will make a flight from A to B possible.
5:26 “Shiesa” lol😂
Its cursing in german
@@doggostudios1 didn’t know, thanks for telling me
Nah what is that butter 😂😂 the passengers in their seats 💀💀
YESSS, A REALISTIC PLANE MODEL
0:01 Bro was a little too happy
My favorite sentence in this video is
"we can flush"
That made me genuinely laugh
The orangutan 😭😭 lol 😂
Tbh, I liked the Tollis A340 600 better. Has great realism, is way cheaper and has 3 tilted landing gear.
Way cheaper? They’re both $89.99
@@tomstravels520 Ye mb, I think that it was 50$ when I bought it.
@@richa-cool that would have been on sale then
$90 for each plane in x plane is diabolical i’ll stick with msfs which is better anyway
MSFS has horrendous flight dynamics. And a disastrous Aerosoft A330. It’s a sim more for gamers only interested in textures resolution rather than anything else (becausw it‘s the only thing they seem to care of). If 90$ is too much for you for such a high-fidelity system simulation of the A330 you must be very broke.
@@angelicguru4066 yes, it is too much and i’m sure it is the same for everyone. one bad aircraft doesn’t mean the whole game is bad. msfs 2024 is the best simulator this year and that is the truth. more people play msfs over x plane and we all know why, because of the arcadey ahh graphica
Same as McDonalds are the best restaurants because they are the most visited (by teenagers).
@@angelicguru4066 you havent seen fenix right? we got both, great simulations of systems and a good loocking aircraft not like roblox simulator lol
Yesterday I watched a stream by Capt. JC Rage an Airbus A330 pilot from he Philippines and he noticed that there was a problem with th RNAV.
better make a joystick made out of purely fresh butter
Make a butter stick
Bro was really edging to that gear 😂
A330 cockpit quality reminds me Extreme Landings Android specially cockpit lighting
Me: click on video
Swiss in the first 3 seconds: huhhh😩😩😩😩😩😩😩 huhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh😩😩😩😩😩😩😩😩😩
Love the vid, Please review the flybywire a320 mod!
Hey, swiss001 do you know what time of year it is, right, Microsoft Flight Simulator 2024 is around the corner. So that is why they are so many ultra realistic airliners.
Swiss never fails to make me jealous
it's almost like it's a WIP, Swiss.
past 3 videos: ULTRA REALISTIC - IS IT WORTH IT??
Tries to test out the ROPS feature……..didn’t enable the ROPS feature
Right
0:37 james may moment
ima buy it after this
EVERYONE WAKE UP!!! SWISS001 UPLOAD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
BEFORE ONE BILLION YEARS
👇
50 40 30 20 10 10…. Swiss oo 1 butter classic is back
Swiss when are you going to refresh the member list at the end
12:32 Most Replayed?
The goat uploads again!!!
Bro took off with 59 tons of fuel 💀🤦♂️
Don't smoke
Youre videos are the best
0:01 organism
The toilet A330 has no toilet? 🤔
Is this the LVFR version or the Headwind version?
It's the Toliss for x-plane 11/12
Toliss wasn’t about graphics in the first place
I was here for the stream🗿
“Airplane review channel”
Why is Swiss001 SO HIMATHY
Bro just thinks of a plane and make a video about how good it is
finally xplane making a comeback. toliss made shit better then aerosoft
Sorry mate I was searching what up what a Skinwalker is🕷️
here before 50 views!
The A330’s V1 is slower than my 737😑
Whats with the vine booms?
Stardenburdenhardenbart
100€ for this? for real?
Not really. It’s 83€ on the org. But if you are just looking for perfect cockpit textures and don’t value the hard work put into the almost perfect systems and flight dynamics it may simply just not be for you. Or you are very poor. Or both lol.
@@frankbyte Very poor? Are you being serious right now? The base game costs 80 bucks, semi good sim hardware costs $300+, and you're calling me "very poor" because I don't think a single aircraft is worth a hundred bucks? Not even full fidelity DCS modules cost that much and they're of higher quality.
@@ImNotQualifiedToSayThisBut lol, yes you are simply broke, just admit it. It‘s not even worth mentionning knowing 1h in a level D sim costs 250€. For only 1h! And they developped that plane with very acurate and almost complete systems that real Airbus pilots find very good. It’s a joke how little we have to pay nowadays to get such high systems-fidelity.
@@frankbyte lmao you're insane
@@ImNotQualifiedToSayThisBut lmao you should get a decent job.
Im the 100 person to like the video!!
Awesome!
Worth it
Germans at 5:24: 😂
watch not cut yourself on those sharp edges in the cockpit
I dont really like commenting yet here I am
I would buy it but its just too expensive 😭
Yeah...XP is done for me lol. Those cockpit textures are HORRID! And before the "It'S XpLaNe, It'S NoT SuPpOsEd To LoOk PrEtTy", yeah I get that but the new MSFS 2024 physics are going to pretty much kill X-plane. Combine and graphics of MSFS 2020 and the physics of XP and you get MSFS24, what more do you want?
A computer that can actually run MSFS2024 at 60fps without costing over $1000
Agreed brother, x-plane is the only simulator where you can do a long flight without your sim crashing Which is probably why most long haul aircraft devs use X-Plane
@@MSDAviation_idk what your talking about. I haven’t had a single crash of fs2020 for over 2 years knock on wood. In xplane I used to get it about every 2 flights. Instability is what steered me away from xplane
X-Plane can run in Windows, Mac and Linux and Laminar is working on new scenery engine. X-Plane is not going anywhere no matter how much MS fanbois wish it.
@@majoraviatior1611 the only crashes I’ve had since XP12 were caused by autoortho but is mostly fixed now. MSFS I had dozens of crashes for over a year after it first released and then started having them again after a recent SU
does swiss respond
Is he always gonna moan when he sees a smooth landing?
No
its still looks terrible or shit as you said😁😁😁
Jardesign lowkey better tho
Before 11 minets
Yo
Try FlightGear
Deine Videos sind immer voller Ideen und Kreativität. Vielen Dank für die Inspiration!💙💗🍀
.
Bros internet footprint is gonna be wild 💀
I found out that my duolingo can actually help for word mixing into sentences:)
@@MichaelGAMING99 ok
Hi
😮
Realistic
30 Min gang
👇
swissgasm 😂😂
Hi 🎉
Hallo Mr Schmid
Groan001
Broing 💀
A340 better
100 euros for this ? What is the great feature in this plane that worths 100 euros ? Like, just the systems ? Yeah, they are great, but for 100 euros ?? You as a normal personal are going to use this addon to your A330 TR or something that justifies it? I know that nobody does that but let’s just pretend that none addon worths 100 euros when you only have a good simulation system but the rest of the airplane is fucked up. We don’t even have a proper wing flex, not to even mention the modeling and graphics of this plane… Jesus
The wing flex is adjustable so he possibly had it on the lowest setting. And what is it with people moaning about textures? Is it Fenix level? No, but why should it be? And if you read the forums people do actually use this for TR training
@@tomstravels520 why not to be at Fenix or iFly level? If you for instance complain about the Aerosoft/CaptainScam for having bad simulated systems, why then it should have? Demanding decent graphics and sounds when you are paying 100 euros is not an absurd, but what every product should have. This is not free yo. Imagine if now every sim dev does what ToLiss does… we would be still in the 2005 of the flight sim with this mediocre mentality
@@stlucia-b7u you seriously expect the same graphics as Fenix or iFly…….addons that don’t run natively and require their own program to function ….. would you like their FPS rate as well? Or are you gifted with an RTX4090 so it’s no issue even at 8K? We’re talking about 2 different simulators here, of course the graphics are going to be different. Do you think the Aerosoft A330 is a good plane because of the level of cockpit textures? And I don’t complain about Captain Sim because I wasn’t suckered into buying it
@@tomstravels520 my point is about the price only. If the plane was 40 euros for example, it would worth maybe. But for 100 euros??? No way… You don’t need a RTX4090 to run X-Plane 12. And fyi MSFS2020 is way more optimized and less consuming power than X-Plane 12. Anyways, it’s just our opinion in the end of the day, it won’t change anything. Cheers bro!
@@stlucia-b7u no but you need an RTX4090 to run MSFS2020 and the Fenix and something like JFK or LHR at 60fps. And it is absolutely not less power consuming. I have a smart meter at home that runs higher when MSFS2020 is being used
Third
early!
first
not even close
👇 Before 2 minutes
begging for likes won’t get you anywhere
Begging for likes in 2024 is wild
Bro what did i do wrong
not this time😢
“👇” Is what’s wrong
First
First
Nuh uh
@@nonamefais3427Actually, yes. They are first
@@nonamefais3427You were 3