So a Swedish Newspaper could have access to the site but Russian investigators could not? What information has been been removed? Could not a ROV be set down the pipe? We need an independent UN inspection along with samples from the blast sight and inspection of the remaining pipe to determine is there are non exploded bombs
The only result of a Ruzzian 'investigation' could be what Vladolf wants to come out. Just like the 'investigation' of that Malaysian Airlines Flight shot down over Donbas by Ruzzian fascists using a Buk missile from the Ruzzian 53. Air Defense Brigade from Kursk. International experts were hindered to move around the crash site by Ruzzian separatists, and then Ruzzian 'experts' found out that the Ruzzkie missile wasnt a Ruzzkie missile. Sure. We believe everything Lawrow and Putler say. Just like they said three days before the attack on Ukraine they wouldn't attack Ukraine. Stupid clown. Sit down under the next tree and wait for Rudy Reindeer to bring you a beer.
The US controlled UN will *NEVER* do an investigation let alone an independent investigation. FWIW, Norway was in on the sabotage, why would there be any interest in finding any unexploded bomb?
Sweden is neutral it hasn't joined nato yet dispite the intent. And Russia is a direct belligerent along with the US so yeah I think that's a fair call. UN would be great but they don't do anything nor do they really end up impartial so whats the difference.
From my past experience on land based pipelines the failure mechanism came from inside the pipe. If the red internal coating is being seen with the pipeline steel laid out flat then that indicates an internal explosion or pipe failure. You need to keep in mind that to cause a pipeline to fail by applying pressure from the outside the amount of force would be extremely high as the explosion would have to over come the pressure loss to the sea and sea floor and the pressure inside the pipeline. The explosive would need to be placed in the trench next to the pipe.. Pipelines are built with cleaner launching and receiving facility on each end. A pipeline cleaner is placed in the launcher which allows it to go into the gas stream, the cleaner moves along with the gas stream pushing liquids and debris ahead of it to keep the pipe line flowing efficiently. Cleaners can be launched at any given time. If the explosives were placed on the cleaner, remote or timed detonation could take place.
Finally someone who knows something about pipelines. I have though about Pipe pig behind used to destroy the pipe as well but it would require some serious manpower to run on the ground. you need large cranes and many people to install a pig launcher and such. I floated the idea of the anchor dragging method long time ago (I put the answer on quora 2 years ago). I was a underwater diver when i was young and i remember going out on jobs because some dumbass captain dragged an anchor and damaged the pipeline (gulf of mexico). once you hook the pipeline (this pipe was at 80m ~260ft, which is NOT covered, pipeline was covered in trench closer to shore) and puncture it, J-T effect (google this, i know you seen this effect) will take care of the rest and completely destroy the pipeline. pipeline of that much volume of gas will shrink the pipe so much! but hey, what do i know, im just a pipe weld inspector with background in underwater welding.
What I find most extraordinary is that this video is placed on TH-cam in the first place. Who gave the order to put this on youtube with which goal? Furthermore, we are told this is done by five men and a woman on a 15 meter sailing yacht. With these depths alone one needs special equipment that does not even fit on a 15 meter yacht, let alone hide it from plain sight Ones more this proves that governments are lying to us. I have worked for a supplier of steel pipes and I have worked for a supplier for welding equipment for these kinds of pipes. When I heard the news, I really thought how these people can be so stupid to think that we believe their lies. Whoever allowed this to be on TH-cam, thank you for showing this.
Ex-Commericial diver here. I used to work on pipelines underwater when i was young. I don't know why people are fixated on bombs being placed on pipe theory. It's simply too difficult to do without being detected. Many people don't know what it's like to be underwater working. It would be FAR easier and simpler to drag an anchor a hook like contraption to hook a pipeline. All you need to do is damage it enough to cause a leak. J-T effect will destroy the pipeline even further after that. If you look at the video of the drone footages, the trenches you see in the video is VERY narrow. The pipe is over 40 inches wide while the drone sent underwater is slightly bigger then a desktop PC. (look at blueeyes robotics)
@@koreanese1 Thank you for your additional information. Indeed, working on these depths is a world apart. Though these pipelines are welded together on a ship and while this ship is sailing in a slow pace they let the pipeline slide and sink to the bottom. I think that the ones who placed these bombs wanted to make a public statement and it worked. The whole world saw the consequences. Now, a year after the event the truth starts to leak through. The latest is that the people on the sailing yacht (They are still holding on on that yacht story) worked together with the CIA. Well, that is closer to the truth than 6 guys and a woman on a boat Now that Biden and his gang of crooks are out the door the truth will come out. We only have to wait a little longer and then Trump inherits another problem.
@@Ctrl_Del_0 i saw the process of how they installed the pipe. i worked on pipe laying barges before so i am very familiar with the process. welding wise, i watched many footages of this pipeline being built. The pipe is coated with concrete for extra protection on land. when it's welded on the ship (right before its dropped under water, they fit the next section using traditional pipefitting method. Then welders will put in root and hot pass by hand. rest will be filled and capped by automatic welding. then join is covered in special wrap to protect it.
@@Ctrl_Del_0 my main thing is that bomb theory is just too difficult. at 260ft you will need mixed gas diving system as well as decompression chamber. you need a large vessel for that sitting there for long time. also many people dont know just exactly how hard it is to find the pipeline in the water in first place. there are no magical "map marker" to find these. There are coordinates, sure. But when i was diving, we always had hard time finding anything underwater since visibility always sucks at bottom of the ocean. you are talking at best, 10ft vis. it is not easy to find anything. at 260ft deep you are also fighting currents too
A drone like this one that captured the scene that allows you to place explosive charges that you can drop from the boat right next to the pipe doesn't seem impossible to me. Nobody has to dive!
Ex-Commericial diver here. I used to work on pipelines underwater when i was young. I don't know why people are fixated on bombs being placed on pipe theory. It's simply too difficult to do without being detected. Many people don't know what it's like to be underwater working. It would be FAR easier and simpler to drag an anchor a hook like contraption to hook a pipeline. All you need to do is damage it enough to cause a leak. J-T effect will destroy the pipeline even further after that. If you look at the video of the drone footages, the trenches you see in the video is VERY narrow. The pipe is over 40 inches wide while the drone sent underwater is slightly bigger then a desktop PC. (look at blueeyes robotics)
From what I have seen, this pipe was made using the spiral winding method which requires a multiple pass helical weld. Submerged arc is the typical process, first pass inside with all remaining passes on outside. Next, we must look at typical stresses. Two axes of stress are principle, hoop stress which wants to expand the diameter and longitude stress which wants to make the pipe longer. Hoop stress in thin wall cylinder is twice that of longitude stress. Helical angle plays into these stress levels.
Wrong. It was made from sheets of high strength steel..........Be nice if everybody watched the construction and laying of the pipe videos before they spout garbage...............Z
spiral winding is for flange gaskets... For actual welding of pipe, Fit was done using traditional method , root and hot pass was done by actual welders(cant tell the process because no footage in videos) and fill and cap was done by automatic welding process GMAW. Source- im a weld inspector for pipeline and ex-diver
Take a section of pipe and test it under controlled conditions to determine the structural integrity of the pipe. What is clear that such an act of sabotage could only be undertaken by a professional team who is well-resourced and trained. A state actor not a group of mavericks. Either the US or the man with the white fluffy cat. Spectra
I just love that every armchair expert commenting on this video neglects to mention that pressurized gas erupted from these pipelines and that the forces of these eruptions further rupture, split and bend the steel outwards no matter what the cause of the initial failure.
Pressurized to 164bar (2400psi) would generate a thrust roughly equivalent to 1.5 SpaceX Merlin engines. So yes, the pipes would whip around up and out of their trenches.
man how many times i tried to explain people of J-T effect on piping. I have background in commerical diving and pipe weld inspection. I personally believe that pipeline was damaged from anchor dragging. with that much volume of gas in the pipe, all you need to do is cause enough damage to start a J-T effect and start chain reaction of damage from constriction of pipeline. people dont even know how deep the pipeline is and going around talking about divers and shit. at 260ft(80meters) you need mixed gas to even go that far down, regular air can kill you from nitrogen narcosis. air diving is different then free-diving.
Nice presentation, especially the calming music, in case we get disturbed and beautiful hand movements of the therapist… everything becomes immediately so clear, no need for international investigation…
@Brown Green So you believe Sy Hersh's source was a Russian plant when Russia was publicly suspecting the UK and said as much in the public news, but their Russian inside agent in the USA had a better idea, by duping Hersh into the elaborate explanation of diverse aspects of US military operations interwoven to contradict Russia's public suspicion ? How can that be credible. ?
@@browngreen933 It is commonly understood that America would not engage in such behavior. The United States prioritizes promoting peace, fostering democratic ideals, and consistently offering support to its allies. The United States is often regarded as a prominent global leader in advocating for and facilitating peace efforts.
I have a image of the pipe breaking, and the two ends flailing like a garden hose out of control. Two hundred metres of pipe whipping like a jockey in the grand national.
Unless of course, blowing up a pipeline stops eastern Europe from financing its own destruction and increases America's energy exports, offsetting the cost of all of those wonderful weapons they send for Ukraine to defend herself.
Thanks for sharing this vid Judged by its quite smooth line, the broken edge seems like welding joining. If the detonator was placed on the top of the pipe, the broken edge should be bent inward in a random curve form or a random form of hole(s).
The shaped concrete cladding is some distance from the pipe. The shattered pipe looks circular. It’s not pushed inwards in any way. The images after 14:50 show the steel is bent outwards. This could only happen from an internal explosion. They are not consistent with a mine detonating on the pipe exterior.
The explosion could have only occured inside the pipe. There is no compressive effect from the exterior. The bomb was placed in the pipe on land at the site where access was intended to take place. The entry point was hundreds of kilometers from the blast site.
There are previous cases of similar pipelines being repaired, just that the damage was by different causes. In any case the cause of the damage does not change the way it is repaired. They cut off a length of pipe on each side of the pipe and install a new length in that part. Of course not an easy job, the most difficult being joining the new length of pipe to the rest of it. There will also need to be extensive cleaning and possibly recoating of the interior.
@@stefpix Dry welding is done at depth using a diving bell device over the weld joint. It is at local pressure, about 1 Bar each 10 meters of sea water depth. Cleaning and drying the pipeline is done with moving plugs called pigs. Very dry air is used to remove all water. Vacuum is also used.
In a court case Gazprom got sued by German (company?) for failing to adhere to the contract to deliver gas to the German entity. That case cost Gazprom €13 Billion however since Nord got destroyed Gazprom was physically unable to fulfill the contract to deliver the gas and this saved them an extra €40 Billion in costs due to it being beyond the control of Gazprom. Pretty convenient IMO.
When was is sued? Gasprom was willing to provide gas as soon as Germany would agree to accept it. Siemens could not fix Nordstream 1, because their factory in Canada could not return the turbines to Russia due to the sunctions. Yet, Russia was more than eager to provide the gas through Nordstream 2. However, Germany refused to use it, for it was under sunctions as well.
not all of us, i don't know - and i'm grown up enough to admit that i don't know when i don't know you people are suspecting and believing, this is not knowing - next someone comes and points to a part of the bible where it was foretold if only a highly trained group of specialist can do this, it must be US ?? there are no other specialists on the whole planet (which is a globe btw.) building is always much harder than destroying so, if only trained specialists == US, then only US could build such a pipeline ? it might have been US, yes - but there is still no proof, except a retired 'investigative journalist' having a secret informant telling him something important, so he can feel important again. conspiracy theories are fun... maybe it was the aliens watching us from inside the hollow moon, or the nazis from the far side of the moon - no sorry, the nazis are supposed tho be in ukraine now and we as humans are said to be an intelligent species ? note, that we are telling this to ourselves - so it must be true.
----- > ... @ 7 29 - 8 01, "there is no angle grinder signs on the edge of the steel. And it would be strange to me if say someone had bent this. The force of bending 45 millimeters of steel and that side is quite heavy. And, it, at least to me, really looks like its been torn off. And, with the high pressure inside the pipes, it is not hard to understand that it could bend the pipe."
9:42 👍 good idear Thank you VERY much for uploading this ❓ 11:56 13:02 and you don't need a lot of effort to blow up the pipe, it can be done with a drone full of explosives that magnetagly atatches to the iron in the pipe. This is real usa tacktics/foolishness, the same as the whole Afganistan debacle.
wikipedia: "Björn Lund, Associate Professor in Seismology at The Swedish National Seismic Network said "there is no doubt that these were explosions" at an estimated 100-kilogram (220 lb) TNT equivalent.". That would be 75 kg RDX *4. About the weight of one men per explosion.
@@janklaas6885 I don't know what explosives were used. Seymour Hersh mentioned C4. Someone reacted to me that Seymour was wrong on this, but did not provide a source. The Swedish government investigators published there were (traces of) explosives found on the pipes, but did not mention what kind. The German Bundesanwaltschaft said they found traces of explosives on the yaght, but also did not mention what kind. (Correct me if I'm wrong.) I only mentioned RDX as an exemple to show that 100 kg TNT equivalent can be less in modern explosives. Just checked: It would be 80 kg semtex. What are your sources?
@@HvdHaghen Im not a prof. but if i think about it, it has been done on the most easy way, thats not with divers. And the pipes were not made outoff steel but iron, you can see its broken, only the thin layer of steel between the concreate and the iron is bent. And of cource the usa did it, proffesor J Sacks is also convinced about that just like S Hersh and just like me th-cam.com/video/2MP6lPyhRrI/w-d-xo.html
You watch Max Blumental in his Speech the US pay 4.5 Million Dollar to Atlantic Driving Supply with Specified Explosive Equipment only was able to pick in his report just wondering , thanks for nice informative Vedio
No, the pipeline can be repaired, tested with pressurized water, dried and put back into service. It must be absolutely dry as methane and water form an ice called gas hydrate that will plug flow.
"...nuclearpowerelectricfactory olkiluoto 3 was testing even 1600mw/day, oxygenlesswater move with north-west wind to the blue-green alga area, and somewhere have to be a hole, because both nordstream and nordstream II pipelines explosed
It's estimated that a minimum of 150 TONS of explosives were used. That isn't gonna fit on a shitty yacht......lol.......I'm thinking it was a Tactical Nuke.......fwifw.................Z
Steel bent outward. That indicates the explosion was generated within the the pipe itself. The real question now is, who planted the explosive devices in the maintenance slug that gets run through the pipe? I'd almost bet it was destined to explode at Germany's terminal port to wreck havoc on it with it's storage tanks....
I can see that from Putin, but I think the "mystery factor" was part of the equation. Speaking of mysteries, we have a small boat theory for six; why didn't they scuttle the Andromeda? There is a whole lot of the "theory" floating around that seems off the point.
One guy who studied all the videos said Nord Stream 1 looked blown by explosives, while Nord Stream 2 looked like a rip caused by faulty construction. That, plus the fact that the failure locations between NS 1 and NS 2 are 80 km apart made him think NS 2 was a natural failure, but that caused whoever planted bombs on NS 1 to detonate them because they knew inspection drones would be sent down and would find the planted bombs.
Faulty construction - I have seen how these tubes are welded together, and it seems rather unlikely. If a “natural rupture”, the ends should be rather close, as a rupture would not blow away many meters of tube. But its tricky, because the hole near Bornholm (NS2a), is the tube which has 2 holes, the first up near Sweden, close to the other holes. And the second tube is NS2b, is completely intact. Isn’t it strange, if the purpose was to halt gas altogether, why leave 1 tube intact, which means in fact half the capacity of the gas received so far, the 2 tubes in NS1, remains? This leads us to think, this sabotage was more of “a message”, than a desire to stop all gas. Now, if Germany wanted to import gas from Russia, they could start right away. Putin offered that many months ago, as he perfectly knows one tube is still intact. Importing gas through only one tube, would insure the price for that remains high. If there was gas flowing through all 4 tubes, that would far exceed demands, and price would plummet. Who would be interested in sending gas through 4 tubes for 100 Euros, at full capacity, when you could send through 1 tube, and still receive 100 Euros?
@@poulnrgaard7820 Video blamed faulty construction on the pipeline laying ship/crew rushing things before sanctions against NS 2 took effect. He also showed how the pipe boat was pushed all over in a storm right in the area of the break, leading him to suspect rushed, faulty construction leading to failure. Yes, who potentially benefits from one NS 2 remaining intact? Russia. Plus NS 2 is 100% Russian owned while blown NS 1 is just 51%. I think Putin wanted drive a wedge between USA and Germany using the Biden comment as cover. Russian false flag psyop. Putin KBG 4D chess.
@@poulnrgaard7820 ---- > Evidently, the ruptures didn't occur on the same day. In a September 8, 2022 interview, Putin said there was already a rupture in Nordstream 1 .... Gazprom performed August maintenance about a week before an in-person interview on September 8, 202 where Putin said: : .... "Now, the last turbine is out of order. Representatives from Siemens (in Germany) came and looked. There is an oil leak. There is an explosive and flammable situation. But, of course, the turbine cannot work. Give us a turbine, we will turn on Nordstream 1 tomorrow. They don't give anything. They say we use gas as a weapon. What weapon? They themselves have done things. It's them who have put themselves into an impasse because of the sanctions." (Vladimir Putin) @ 0: 50 - 1: 18 Nord Stream 1 Shut, Putin Dangles Nord Stream 2 Offer | Move To Lure Germany As EU Caps Russian Gas? (crux Sept 8, 2022) th-cam.com/video/dcV5nhRySHk/w-d-xo.html .... On August 31, 2022, Gazprom had closed Nordstream 1 for three days of repairs at the Portovaya compression station in Russia, about three weeks before the reported explosions of September 24, 2022) Putin claimed the damage was caused due to sanctions on the return of turbine. Kremlin: only sanctions prevent Nord Stream gas pipeline from working www.reuters.com/business/energy/kremlin-only-sanctions-prevent-nord-stream-gas-pipeline-working-2022-08-30/ It was determined that the turbine was not the cause. Also, on August 4, Russia's Gazprom refused to accept return of the turbine.(Kyiv Independent). It was, again, offered to be returned on August 8 still within the allotted time frame.. (cnbc) Deadlock with Russia over Nord Stream gas turbine is not our fault, Siemens Energy CEO says www.cnbc.com/2022/08/08/russia-gas-siemens-energy-ceo-says-turbine-dispute-is-not-our-fault.html In his September 8, 2022 interview, Putin expressed no concern that Nordstream 1 had been sabotaged. No one has asked if Gazprom did a search for explosives during that time. Some had warned Russia's manipulation of the flow of gas in the pipes was dangerous but there still had to be a spark to set off the fire. Potential sabotage: What's behind the Nord Stream pipeline leaks? | DW News th-cam.com/video/ShXmPA21j-E/w-d-xo.html
The US (lunatic Biden) & Norway should be billed by Russia, Germany and the other smaller investors who paid to have Nord Stream build. A Lawsuit should be filed with The International Court in the Hague for repairs, cost and total economic, environmental impact should be assessed and The US & Norway should pick up the entire cost.
Vivà le Putin 👍 President Vladimir Putin is the greatest leader of the free World 🌍 We fully support all his actions in Ukraine and pray for his success and glory 🙏 May God bless him and the people of Russia Amen From Pakistan 🇵🇰
That's a huge assumption, the easiest way to blow something up that is under pressure is to simply weaken it from the outside, then let the internal pressure finish the job by blowing it out. This provides no evidence that the initial weakening or explosion was internal or external, just that the result was a massive blowout, which is hardly surprising.
So a Swedish Newspaper could have access to the site but Russian investigators could not? What information has been been removed? Could not a ROV be set down the pipe? We need an independent UN inspection along with samples from the blast sight and inspection of the remaining pipe to determine is there are non exploded bombs
The only result of a Ruzzian 'investigation' could be what Vladolf wants to come out. Just like the 'investigation' of that Malaysian Airlines Flight shot down over Donbas by Ruzzian fascists using a Buk missile from the Ruzzian 53. Air Defense Brigade from Kursk. International experts were hindered to move around the crash site by Ruzzian separatists, and then Ruzzian 'experts' found out that the Ruzzkie missile wasnt a Ruzzkie missile. Sure. We believe everything Lawrow and Putler say. Just like they said three days before the attack on Ukraine they wouldn't attack Ukraine.
Stupid clown. Sit down under the next tree and wait for Rudy Reindeer to bring you a beer.
The US controlled UN will *NEVER* do an investigation let alone an independent investigation. FWIW, Norway was in on the sabotage, why would there be any interest in finding any unexploded bomb?
Very true.
Sweden is neutral it hasn't joined nato yet dispite the intent. And Russia is a direct belligerent along with the US so yeah I think that's a fair call.
UN would be great but they don't do anything nor do they really end up impartial so whats the difference.
russia had *very* early access to the site of the explosion
ETA: What I'm saying is that russia blew it up
From my past experience on land based pipelines the failure mechanism came from inside the pipe. If the red internal coating is being seen with the pipeline steel laid out flat then that indicates an internal explosion or pipe failure.
You need to keep in mind that to cause a pipeline to fail by applying pressure from the outside the amount of force would be extremely high as the explosion would have to over come the pressure loss to the sea and sea floor and the pressure inside the pipeline. The explosive would need to be placed in the trench next to the pipe..
Pipelines are built with cleaner launching and receiving facility on each end. A pipeline cleaner is placed in the launcher which allows it to go into the gas stream, the cleaner moves along with the gas stream pushing liquids and debris ahead of it to keep the pipe line flowing efficiently. Cleaners can be launched at any given time. If the explosives were placed on the cleaner, remote or timed detonation could take place.
Thanks for the description of this feature and possibility. Thought provoking.
Finally someone who knows something about pipelines. I have though about Pipe pig behind used to destroy the pipe as well but it would require some serious manpower to run on the ground. you need large cranes and many people to install a pig launcher and such. I floated the idea of the anchor dragging method long time ago (I put the answer on quora 2 years ago). I was a underwater diver when i was young and i remember going out on jobs because some dumbass captain dragged an anchor and damaged the pipeline (gulf of mexico). once you hook the pipeline (this pipe was at 80m ~260ft, which is NOT covered, pipeline was covered in trench closer to shore) and puncture it, J-T effect (google this, i know you seen this effect) will take care of the rest and completely destroy the pipeline. pipeline of that much volume of gas will shrink the pipe so much! but hey, what do i know, im just a pipe weld inspector with background in underwater welding.
What I find most extraordinary is that this video is placed on TH-cam in the first place.
Who gave the order to put this on youtube with which goal?
Furthermore, we are told this is done by five men and a woman on a 15 meter sailing yacht. With these depths alone one needs special equipment that does not even fit on a 15 meter yacht, let alone hide it from plain sight Ones more this proves that governments are lying to us.
I have worked for a supplier of steel pipes and I have worked for a supplier for welding equipment for these kinds of pipes.
When I heard the news, I really thought how these people can be so stupid to think that we believe their lies.
Whoever allowed this to be on TH-cam, thank you for showing this.
Who are "WE" and which goverment told you that it was that yacht? You seem retarded.
Ex-Commericial diver here. I used to work on pipelines underwater when i was young. I don't know why people are fixated on bombs being placed on pipe theory. It's simply too difficult to do without being detected. Many people don't know what it's like to be underwater working. It would be FAR easier and simpler to drag an anchor a hook like contraption to hook a pipeline. All you need to do is damage it enough to cause a leak. J-T effect will destroy the pipeline even further after that. If you look at the video of the drone footages, the trenches you see in the video is VERY narrow. The pipe is over 40 inches wide while the drone sent underwater is slightly bigger then a desktop PC. (look at blueeyes robotics)
@@koreanese1
Thank you for your additional information.
Indeed, working on these depths is a world apart. Though these pipelines are welded together on a ship and while this ship is sailing in a slow pace they let the pipeline slide and sink to the bottom.
I think that the ones who placed these bombs wanted to make a public statement and it worked.
The whole world saw the consequences.
Now, a year after the event the truth starts to leak through.
The latest is that the people on the sailing yacht (They are still holding on on that yacht story) worked together with the CIA. Well, that is closer to the truth than 6 guys and a woman on a boat
Now that Biden and his gang of crooks are out the door the truth will come out.
We only have to wait a little longer and then Trump inherits another problem.
@@Ctrl_Del_0 i saw the process of how they installed the pipe. i worked on pipe laying barges before so i am very familiar with the process. welding wise, i watched many footages of this pipeline being built. The pipe is coated with concrete for extra protection on land. when it's welded on the ship (right before its dropped under water, they fit the next section using traditional pipefitting method. Then welders will put in root and hot pass by hand. rest will be filled and capped by automatic welding. then join is covered in special wrap to protect it.
@@Ctrl_Del_0 my main thing is that bomb theory is just too difficult. at 260ft you will need mixed gas diving system as well as decompression chamber. you need a large vessel for that sitting there for long time. also many people dont know just exactly how hard it is to find the pipeline in the water in first place. there are no magical "map marker" to find these. There are coordinates, sure. But when i was diving, we always had hard time finding anything underwater since visibility always sucks at bottom of the ocean. you are talking at best, 10ft vis. it is not easy to find anything. at 260ft deep you are also fighting currents too
A sail boat, a team of six hobby divers, no compression chamber... They must think we're brain dead.
A drone like this one that captured the scene that allows you to place explosive charges that you can drop from the boat right next to the pipe doesn't seem impossible to me.
Nobody has to dive!
Most are brain dead........that's the problem..........lol.............Z
Ex-Commericial diver here. I used to work on pipelines underwater when i was young. I don't know why people are fixated on bombs being placed on pipe theory. It's simply too difficult to do without being detected. Many people don't know what it's like to be underwater working. It would be FAR easier and simpler to drag an anchor a hook like contraption to hook a pipeline. All you need to do is damage it enough to cause a leak. J-T effect will destroy the pipeline even further after that. If you look at the video of the drone footages, the trenches you see in the video is VERY narrow. The pipe is over 40 inches wide while the drone sent underwater is slightly bigger then a desktop PC. (look at blueeyes robotics)
I'm surprised you didn't find the passports.
they found them! in that ridiculous boat rent theory and they were ukrianians 🤣😂😂😂🤣
I heard they found russian news papers in a car parked near the site
excellent
Thank you very much. Now we know the depth of the target site and water temperature. 75m, 13C.
From what I have seen, this pipe was made using the spiral winding method which requires a multiple pass helical weld. Submerged arc is the typical process, first pass inside with all remaining passes on outside.
Next, we must look at typical stresses. Two axes of stress are principle, hoop stress which wants to expand the diameter and longitude stress which wants to make the pipe longer. Hoop stress in thin wall cylinder is twice that of longitude stress.
Helical angle plays into these stress levels.
Is that so And
Keith, thank you for that information ......Paul in USA
Wrong. It was made from sheets of high strength steel..........Be nice if everybody watched the construction and laying of the pipe videos before they spout garbage...............Z
@@zardiw
Are you Stevie Wonder? The pipe has a spiral weld.
spiral winding is for flange gaskets... For actual welding of pipe, Fit was done using traditional method , root and hot pass was done by actual welders(cant tell the process because no footage in videos) and fill and cap was done by automatic welding process GMAW. Source- im a weld inspector for pipeline and ex-diver
Take a section of pipe and test it under controlled conditions to determine the structural integrity of the pipe. What is clear that such an act of sabotage could only be undertaken by a professional team who is well-resourced and trained. A state actor not a group of mavericks. Either the US or the man with the white fluffy cat. Spectra
aswedishjournalistjustprovedyouwrong....ashedidithimselfwithverylimitedresourcesdidhenot(spacekeystuckneednewkeyboard)
I just love that every armchair expert commenting on this video neglects to mention that pressurized gas erupted from these pipelines and that the forces of these eruptions further rupture, split and bend the steel outwards no matter what the cause of the initial failure.
Pressurized to 164bar (2400psi) would generate a thrust roughly equivalent to 1.5 SpaceX Merlin engines. So yes, the pipes would whip around up and out of their trenches.
man how many times i tried to explain people of J-T effect on piping. I have background in commerical diving and pipe weld inspection. I personally believe that pipeline was damaged from anchor dragging. with that much volume of gas in the pipe, all you need to do is cause enough damage to start a J-T effect and start chain reaction of damage from constriction of pipeline. people dont even know how deep the pipeline is and going around talking about divers and shit. at 260ft(80meters) you need mixed gas to even go that far down, regular air can kill you from nitrogen narcosis. air diving is different then free-diving.
Thanks for this, just now seeing it. Fantastic footage sir.
Nice job done...similar to the movie "thunderball" where the covert operation was done underwater of a busy ocean.
Nice presentation, especially the calming music, in case we get disturbed and beautiful hand movements of the therapist… everything becomes immediately so clear, no need for international investigation…
Seymour Hersh - 'How America Took Out The Nord Stream Pipeline'
How Seymour Hersh was duped by Russian intelligence.
@Brown Green So you believe Sy Hersh's source was a Russian plant when Russia was publicly suspecting the UK and said as much in the public news, but their Russian inside agent in the USA had a better idea, by duping Hersh into the elaborate explanation of diverse aspects of US military operations interwoven to contradict Russia's public suspicion ? How can that be credible. ?
@@browngreen933 It is commonly understood that America would not engage in such behavior. The United States prioritizes promoting peace, fostering democratic ideals, and consistently offering support to its allies. The United States is often regarded as a prominent global leader in advocating for and facilitating peace efforts.
@@AlexS-gs9ov So do buy that USA did it?
@@AlexS-gs9ov
Welcome to the real world.
US INTERVENTIONS SINCE WWII
(BOMB ATTACKS, SABOTAGE, ATTEMPTED REGIME CHANGE)
LAOS,1964-73
LIBYA,1989
SYRIA,1949
DOMINICAN
PHILIPPINES,1989
KOREA,1950-53
REPUBLIC,1965-66
PANAMA,1989-90
CHINA,1950-53
PERU,1965
IRAQ,1991
IRAN,1953
GREECE,1967
KUWAIT,1991
GUATEMALA,1954 GUATEMALA,1967-69 SOMALIA,1992·94
TIBET,1955-70s
CAMBODIA,1969-70
IRAQ,1992-1996
INDONESIA,1958
CHILE,1970-73
BOSNIA,1995
CUBA.1959
ARGENTINA,1976
IRAQ,1998
ANGOLA,1976·92
SUDAN,1998
REPUBLIC OF TURKEY,1980 AFGHANISTAN,1998
CONGO,1960-65
POLAND,1980-81
YUGOSLAVIA,1999
EL SALVADOR,1981-92 AFGHANISTAN,2001
NICARAGUA,1981-90
IRAQ,2002-03
VIETNAM,1961-73
CAMBODIA,1980-95
SOMALIA,2006-07
BRAZIL,1964
LEBANON,1982-84
IRAN,2005-PRESENT
REPUBLIC OF GRENADA,1983-84 LIBYA,2011
CONGO,1964
LIBYA,1986
VENEZUELA,2019
GUATEMALA,1964
IRAN,1987-88
I have a image of the pipe breaking, and the two ends flailing like a garden hose out of control. Two hundred metres of pipe whipping like a jockey in the grand national.
Patrick, what a great description, Paul in the USA
Blowing up the pipe must rate a crime against humanity..........I say those who ordered it should get the death sentence.
Unless of course, blowing up a pipeline stops eastern Europe from financing its own destruction and increases America's energy exports, offsetting the cost of all of those wonderful weapons they send for Ukraine to defend herself.
Nice job Trond, regards Graham
When did you perform this drone investigation?. Water temperature is at 12 point 5 °C, it is cold but not that cold.
Thanks for sharing this vid
Judged by its quite smooth line, the broken edge seems like welding joining. If the detonator was placed on the top of the pipe, the broken edge should be bent inward in a random curve form or a random form of hole(s).
youdropthechargeunderneaththepipethewayitaliansdroppedminesinalexandriaunderbritishbattleshipsiwithminisubsinWW2
please don't add background music.
The music is for your relaxation while watching such disturbing video…
Hello Trond, thanks for the video..do you think Same thing happened to N.St.2 ??
The shaped concrete cladding is some distance from the pipe. The shattered pipe looks circular. It’s not pushed inwards in any way. The images after 14:50 show the steel is bent outwards. This could only happen from an internal explosion. They are not consistent with a mine detonating on the pipe exterior.
Maybe you meant the images after 11:50?
The explosion could have only occured inside the pipe. There is no compressive effect from the exterior. The bomb was placed in the pipe on land at the site where access was intended to take place. The entry point was hundreds of kilometers from the blast site.
je pense la même chose
They blew up one pipe twice though didn’t they? Hell of an error to do from the end of a pipe when they could’ve just turned off a valve.
Then how come Sweden said it was sabotage ?
Hello. Have you also recorded the site of the Nord Stream 2 blast (south east of Bornholm)?
wonderful information, thank yo so much, I find your sincerity is very nice, cheers rorm Florida, USA....Paul
Interesting. What could the thing(s) on 12:43 possibly be?
Nice Work!
The explosion looks to have started inside the pipe. Everything is pushed outward.
We have ways.
Is this a total lost to the pipelines or can it be repair?
There are previous cases of similar pipelines being repaired, just that the damage was by different causes. In any case the cause of the damage does not change the way it is repaired. They cut off a length of pipe on each side of the pipe and install a new length in that part. Of course not an easy job, the most difficult being joining the new length of pipe to the rest of it. There will also need to be extensive cleaning and possibly recoating of the interior.
It can be repaired. Within hyperbaric dry welding depth or it can be raised to the surface..IIRC, this was an S lay pipeline as it isn't deep.
@@listerdave1240 looks shot to hell, to me... the smoking gun!
@@keithjurena9319 how do they perform welding at depth? Also cleaning the pipeline of sand and debris must be complex
@@stefpix
Dry welding is done at depth using a diving bell device over the weld joint. It is at local pressure, about 1 Bar each 10 meters of sea water depth.
Cleaning and drying the pipeline is done with moving plugs called pigs. Very dry air is used to remove all water. Vacuum is also used.
Is this aeria not forbidden ? I suppose poutin would like to have a closer look !
In a court case Gazprom got sued by German (company?) for failing to adhere to the contract to deliver gas to the German entity. That case cost Gazprom €13 Billion however since Nord got destroyed Gazprom was physically unable to fulfill the contract to deliver the gas and this saved them an extra €40 Billion in costs due to it being beyond the control of Gazprom. Pretty convenient IMO.
When was is sued?
Gasprom was willing to provide gas as soon as Germany would agree to accept it.
Siemens could not fix Nordstream 1, because their factory in Canada could not return the turbines to Russia due to the sunctions.
Yet, Russia was more than eager to provide the gas through Nordstream 2. However, Germany refused to use it, for it was under sunctions as well.
give a link
Biden told the world he was going to destroy the pipe,dont tell lies about who did this crime.
You Sir are misinformed
Great work...
Now we all knew that the US blewup the pipeline. Now who's going to do something about it??? He he he!
@Edmon Dantes and this is the smoking gun, so to say...
No proof at all. Demolition by internal blast means that the charges were place in the pipes on land. No other way.
not all of us, i don't know - and i'm grown up enough to admit that i don't know when i don't know
you people are suspecting and believing, this is not knowing - next someone comes and points to a part of the bible where it was foretold
if only a highly trained group of specialist can do this, it must be US ?? there are no other specialists on the whole planet (which is a globe btw.)
building is always much harder than destroying
so, if only trained specialists == US, then only US could build such a pipeline ?
it might have been US, yes - but there is still no proof, except a retired 'investigative journalist' having a secret informant telling him something important, so he can feel important again.
conspiracy theories are fun... maybe it was the aliens watching us from inside the hollow moon, or the nazis from the far side of the moon - no sorry, the nazis are supposed tho be in ukraine now
and we as humans are said to be an intelligent species ? note, that we are telling this to ourselves - so it must be true.
@@guruware8612 what more proofs do you need, when the US president bragged about blowing up the pipeline for so many times in the media???
Fantastic job
young detective, expert witness.
Great job, thank you.
----- > ... @ 7 29 - 8 01, "there is no angle grinder signs on the edge of the steel. And it would be strange to me if say someone had bent this. The force of bending 45 millimeters of steel and that side is quite heavy. And, it, at least to me, really looks like its been torn off. And, with the high pressure inside the pipes, it is not hard to understand that it could bend the pipe."
torn, agree!
9:42 👍 good idear
Thank you VERY much for uploading this ❓
11:56
13:02 and you don't need a lot of effort to blow up the pipe, it can be done with a drone full of explosives that magnetagly atatches to the iron in the pipe.
This is real usa tacktics/foolishness, the same as the whole Afganistan debacle.
wikipedia: "Björn Lund, Associate Professor in Seismology at The Swedish National Seismic Network said "there is no doubt that these were explosions" at an estimated 100-kilogram (220 lb) TNT equivalent.".
That would be 75 kg RDX *4. About the weight of one men per explosion.
@@HvdHaghen
They used C4 or semtex
@@janklaas6885 I don't know what explosives were used. Seymour Hersh mentioned C4. Someone reacted to me that Seymour was wrong on this, but did not provide a source. The Swedish government investigators published there were (traces of) explosives found on the pipes, but did not mention what kind. The German Bundesanwaltschaft said they found traces of explosives on the yaght, but also did not mention what kind. (Correct me if I'm wrong.)
I only mentioned RDX as an exemple to show that 100 kg TNT equivalent can be less in modern explosives. Just checked: It would be 80 kg semtex. What are your sources?
@@HvdHaghen
Im not a prof. but if i think about it, it has been done on the most easy way, thats not with divers.
And the pipes were not made outoff steel but iron, you can see its broken, only the thin layer of steel between the concreate and the iron is bent.
And of cource the usa did it, proffesor J Sacks is also convinced about that just like S Hersh and just like me
th-cam.com/video/2MP6lPyhRrI/w-d-xo.html
The US Govs answer to no one, not even their own people, ZERO accountability.
You watch Max Blumental in his Speech the US pay 4.5 Million Dollar to Atlantic Driving Supply with Specified Explosive Equipment only was able to pick in his report just wondering , thanks for nice informative Vedio
do the recent findings, match your personal hypothesis about what happened here?
My first inpresion is that it was Don by the inside bicorse of the steel bending out side
Sure, four men and a woman on a 49 foot sailboat did that.
sow salt water goe inside pipes also the remain part of nord stream is destroyed, right?
We will leave it to experts to confirm.
No, the pipeline can be repaired, tested with pressurized water, dried and put back into service. It must be absolutely dry as methane and water form an ice called gas hydrate that will plug flow.
i.e. "blown to smitherines!"
good one
Great Videos! Either Godzilla or Biden ! Both Monsters!
So is it flammable
Three explosions, four pipes. One pipe still intakt. Maybee one detonator did not work. Then it should be possible to find it! 2:32
"...nuclearpowerelectricfactory olkiluoto 3 was testing even 1600mw/day, oxygenlesswater move with north-west wind to the blue-green alga area, and somewhere have to be a hole, because both nordstream and nordstream II pipelines explosed
send down a Lidar equiped drone who can digitalize the crime scean
It's estimated that a minimum of 150 TONS of explosives were used. That isn't gonna fit on a shitty yacht......lol.......I'm thinking it was a Tactical Nuke.......fwifw.................Z
Steel bent outward. That indicates the explosion was generated within the the pipe itself. The real question now is, who planted the explosive devices in the maintenance slug that gets run through the pipe? I'd almost bet it was destined to explode at Germany's terminal port to wreck havoc on it with it's storage tanks....
I can see that from Putin, but I think the "mystery factor" was part of the equation. Speaking of mysteries, we have a small boat theory for six; why didn't they scuttle the Andromeda? There is a whole lot of the "theory" floating around that seems off the point.
Sawdix magic show in memphis
It say Russia all over this.
One guy who studied all the videos said Nord Stream 1 looked blown by explosives, while Nord Stream 2 looked like a rip caused by faulty construction. That, plus the fact that the failure locations between NS 1 and NS 2 are 80 km apart made him think NS 2 was a natural failure, but that caused whoever planted bombs on NS 1 to detonate them because they knew inspection drones would be sent down and would find the planted bombs.
Faulty construction - I have seen how these tubes are welded together, and it seems rather unlikely. If a “natural rupture”, the ends should be rather close, as a rupture would not blow away many meters of tube. But its tricky, because the hole near Bornholm (NS2a), is the tube which has 2 holes, the first up near Sweden, close to the other holes.
And the second tube is NS2b, is completely intact. Isn’t it strange, if the purpose was to halt gas altogether, why leave 1 tube intact, which means in fact half the capacity of the gas received so far, the 2 tubes in NS1, remains? This leads us to think, this sabotage was more of “a message”, than a desire to stop all gas. Now, if Germany wanted to import gas from Russia, they could start right away. Putin offered that many months ago, as he perfectly knows one tube is still intact. Importing gas through only one tube, would insure the price for that remains high. If there was gas flowing through all 4 tubes, that would far exceed demands, and price would plummet. Who would be interested in sending gas through 4 tubes for 100 Euros, at full capacity, when you could send through 1 tube, and still receive 100 Euros?
@@poulnrgaard7820
Video blamed faulty construction on the pipeline laying ship/crew rushing things before sanctions against NS 2 took effect. He also showed how the pipe boat was pushed all over in a storm right in the area of the break, leading him to suspect rushed, faulty construction leading to failure.
Yes, who potentially benefits from one NS 2 remaining intact? Russia. Plus NS 2 is 100% Russian owned while blown NS 1 is just 51%. I think Putin wanted drive a wedge between USA and Germany using the Biden comment as cover. Russian false flag psyop. Putin KBG 4D chess.
@@poulnrgaard7820 ---- > Evidently, the ruptures didn't occur on the same day. In a September 8, 2022 interview, Putin said there was already a rupture in Nordstream 1
.... Gazprom performed August maintenance about a week before an in-person interview on September 8, 202 where Putin said: :
.... "Now, the last turbine is out of order. Representatives from Siemens (in Germany) came and looked. There is an oil leak. There is an explosive and flammable situation. But, of course, the turbine cannot work. Give us a turbine, we will turn on Nordstream 1 tomorrow. They don't give anything. They say we use gas as a weapon. What weapon? They themselves have done things. It's them who have put themselves into an impasse because of the sanctions." (Vladimir Putin)
@ 0: 50 - 1: 18
Nord Stream 1 Shut, Putin Dangles Nord Stream 2 Offer | Move To Lure Germany As EU Caps Russian Gas? (crux Sept 8, 2022)
th-cam.com/video/dcV5nhRySHk/w-d-xo.html
.... On August 31, 2022, Gazprom had closed Nordstream 1 for three days of repairs at the Portovaya compression station in Russia, about three weeks before the reported explosions of September 24, 2022) Putin claimed the damage was caused due to sanctions on the return of turbine.
Kremlin: only sanctions prevent Nord Stream gas pipeline from working www.reuters.com/business/energy/kremlin-only-sanctions-prevent-nord-stream-gas-pipeline-working-2022-08-30/
It was determined that the turbine was not the cause. Also, on August 4, Russia's Gazprom refused to accept return of the turbine.(Kyiv Independent). It was, again, offered to be returned on August 8 still within the allotted time frame.. (cnbc)
Deadlock with Russia over Nord Stream gas turbine is not our fault, Siemens Energy CEO says www.cnbc.com/2022/08/08/russia-gas-siemens-energy-ceo-says-turbine-dispute-is-not-our-fault.html
In his September 8, 2022 interview, Putin expressed no concern that Nordstream 1 had been sabotaged. No one has asked if Gazprom did a search for explosives during that time.
Some had warned Russia's manipulation of the flow of gas in the pipes was dangerous but there still had to be a spark to set off the fire.
Potential sabotage: What's behind the Nord Stream pipeline leaks? | DW News
th-cam.com/video/ShXmPA21j-E/w-d-xo.html
They probably bumped into it with whatever they used to plant the explosives
@@poulnrgaard7820Were not "ruptures" on Nordstream 1 discovered first?
And there were reports sbout a mine found at the intact line of Nordstream 2
I am a swede and i dont think i know this was the u.s well still hate russia but right have to be right
Is it possible to dive to this depth from a sailboat?
Yes, with a proper ladder and some help from the boat crew it should not be a problem. But using a diver for this is not a smart thing.
ah ha! Crime Scene!
ｐｒｏｍｏｓｍ
The US (lunatic Biden) & Norway should be billed by Russia, Germany and the other smaller investors who paid to have Nord Stream build. A Lawsuit should be filed with The International Court in the Hague for repairs, cost and total economic, environmental impact should be assessed and The US & Norway should pick up the entire cost.
Vivà le Putin 👍
President Vladimir Putin is the greatest leader of the free World 🌍
We fully support all his actions in Ukraine and pray for his success and glory 🙏
May God bless him and the people of Russia Amen
From Pakistan 🇵🇰
Great footage, thanks. The pipeline was clearly destroyed by an internal explosion as seen in 4:58; 8:53; 11:36 and NOT sabotage.
That's a huge assumption, the easiest way to blow something up that is under pressure is to simply weaken it from the outside, then let the internal pressure finish the job by blowing it out. This provides no evidence that the initial weakening or explosion was internal or external, just that the result was a massive blowout, which is hardly surprising.
could have been planted before the pipe was sunk... seems the two that said it would happen already expected the pipe was booby trapped/sabotaged.
Wow how do you make that judgement?
you talking bullshit
@@jamienye5351 good point
very interesting. but i miss some loosin PASSPORTS !