Econ Nobel Predictions, Missed Chances, and Questionable Winners | The Marginal Revolution Podcast

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 25 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 17

  • @Libertyfudge
    @Libertyfudge หลายเดือนก่อน

    Before watching, I want to give my two cents that János Kornai should have won the Nobel Prize in Economics at some point in his career; his analysis and comparison of socialism vs capitalism and his advice on transitioning away from socialism alone is worth rewarding

  • @antigonid
    @antigonid หลายเดือนก่อน

    Simulating economies with ai is a problem I've been thinking about for ages and didn't know was already being worked on. So glad some is. It'll make experiments on simulated USAs possible, taking the social out of 'social science'

  • @hkumar7340
    @hkumar7340 หลายเดือนก่อน

    How about Avinash Dixit? He is in his eighties now, and he has a variety of contributions -- including the path-breaking Dixit-Stiglitz model of monopolistic competition.

  • @zardzhang
    @zardzhang หลายเดือนก่อน

    Well deserved!

  • @arunnandabodapati3083
    @arunnandabodapati3083 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The comments on the influence of AI on the Prizes was quite prescient especially with both the Physics and Chemistry being weighed heavily by AI techniques and not just computational methods. And yes Susan Athey deserves it!

  • @abudioc
    @abudioc หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    What’s that Taylor has against Acemoglu?
    I can assure you, he’s going to win this 2024 Nobel in Economics. Just see this year’s so far Noble prize recipients!

  • @franknuzzo2576
    @franknuzzo2576 หลายเดือนก่อน

    There is no beating back inflation. It’s built into every monetary system.

  • @lobster5782
    @lobster5782 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Imagine appointing Buterin for a Nobel in Economics and forgetting about one of the Ethereum founders that led on to build Polkadot and continues to revolutionize the network with groundbreaking updates - Gavin Wood. At least appoint both for founding Ethereum...

  • @FelipeSantos-vw6ef
    @FelipeSantos-vw6ef หลายเดือนก่อน

    Jesus Christ
    Excelente!

  • @joaopedrocamarapereira8478
    @joaopedrocamarapereira8478 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    What do you think of Anwar Shaikh?

    • @hkumar7340
      @hkumar7340 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Heterodox economics is valued slightly better these days than, say, thirty years back. But, no, there is practically zero likelihood that Anwar Shaikh will be a laureate.

    • @joaopedrocamarapereira8478
      @joaopedrocamarapereira8478 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@hkumar7340 I see. Well, in my opinion, that's unfortunate. You can't exactly say that Stiglitz is an ortodox economist, and yet the man has won a Nobel Prize.

    • @hkumar7340
      @hkumar7340 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@joaopedrocamarapereira8478 Stiglitz has made significant contributions to orthodox neo-classical economics; only in the second half of his career did he start thinking differently. Therefore the Nobel...

    • @joaopedrocamarapereira8478
      @joaopedrocamarapereira8478 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@hkumar7340 Interesting. Thanks for the info, I didn't know this.

  • @DF-ss5ep
    @DF-ss5ep หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Crypto, datasets, good out of the box thinking.
    IMO, datasets have untapped potential. The future is not datasets as public goods, but as products. They will be sold in crypto markets. This is useful not only for companies, but to make research more reproducible.

  • @s15e
    @s15e หลายเดือนก่อน

    Curious Gap in Crypto Research?
    Economics and cryptocurrencies:
    1) Why might economists be less engaged?
    2) Could traditional economic frameworks help shed light on this evolving space?
    3) What's your perspective on this intersection of traditional economics and emerging tech?