A big mystery: Why Russia is INCAPABLE of Air Superiority over Ukraine

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 21 มิ.ย. 2023
  • During the Russian invasion of Ukraine, the expected large-scale Russian air campaign to establish air superiority did not materialize. Instead, Russian formations conducted strikes in smaller numbers against targets near the Ukrainian borders. Ukrainian mobile surface-to-air missile systems started inflicting losses on Russian aircraft. The Russian Air Force appeared unprepared for a large-scale campaign aimed at suppressing and neutralizing enemy air defense systems. Furthermore, they struggled to coordinate complex and extensive formations, which could have leveraged the strengths of their diverse and modern fleet of fast jets to compensate for weaknesses. This unforeseen weakness has been a major contributing factor to Russia's failure in attaining air superiority over Ukraine.
    Subscribe Now :
    / @military-tv
  • วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี

ความคิดเห็น • 218

  • @joem0088
    @joem0088 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +56

    1. Because Ukraine has the excellent S300, BUK and other Russia AD technology. 2. Russia does dominate East Ukraine skies by and large. 3 Russia is not risking the bulk of its air assets in anticipation of highly possible war with NATO.

    • @mccormyke
      @mccormyke 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I think Russian pilots are better educated & informed than even Russian Navy. The Air Force seems loyal to Russia, not Putin or the Federation Government. Let's hope so. Russian Air Force controls most of Putin's nuclear weapons

    • @lsad705
      @lsad705 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Thats not why

    • @hanselchristopher534
      @hanselchristopher534 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      @@lsad705 thats exactly nato has been involved in war with countries that didnt have any air defence system of any kind wheres as ukraine has s300,buk and russian defense tech which they know are very capable. Us and Nato only fought countries that didnt have any air defense nor any trained army.

    • @shawnr100
      @shawnr100 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@lsad705 No, that is exactly why.

    • @joem0088
      @joem0088 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@lsad705 NATO always claims air dominance, against goat herder wearing sandals, and a third world army with no real air force or air defense such as Iraq.

  • @TheRealBillBob
    @TheRealBillBob 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    The other big mystery: Why haven't Ukraine been able to take advantage of it? See? Ask a stvpid question....🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

  • @alex3261
    @alex3261 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +35

    During the war in Yugoslavia, in 1999, the allied forces operated pretty much the same way, while dealing with a much weaker opponent.

    • @aleksandarstix3097
      @aleksandarstix3097 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      f117 down f16 down a10 neva 60 godine😂😂😂😂😂

    • @Scroapy
      @Scroapy 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      true, but desert storm was different story....

    • @Elver_Galarga816
      @Elver_Galarga816 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@ScroapyThe eagle dominates the skies 🇺🇸

    • @jdogdarkness
      @jdogdarkness 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      The same as the Russians? Eh, idk give me some examples plz if ur making a comparison.

    • @jdogdarkness
      @jdogdarkness 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The Kosovo war was driven by completely different tech.

  • @jampie2789
    @jampie2789 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +48

    Russians save their aircrafts for the conflict with NATO. The less the Russians use their aircraft, the less NATO can anticipate on tactics when used fullscale.

    • @fernandoc.dacruz1162
      @fernandoc.dacruz1162 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Tá brincando, a Russia com essa velharias voadoras não dá nem para o começo.

    • @Cminor11
      @Cminor11 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      these morons don't even have brains to understand Russia's strategy. 🤣
      Putin is just keeping his abilities classified

    • @madsteve9
      @madsteve9 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      (ruling out the use of WMD's first)
      Nato's tactics, would be the same tactics as Israel vs Syria in 1982 over the Bekaa Valley.
      And has been the Wests standard operating procedure in every, non-policing action since.
      The only improvement, is the addition of Stealth Attack aircraft and Cruise Missiles taking out the C3 (Command, Communication & Control) first.
      Once the Russian Air Superiority Fighters have been taken out. Then the tactical fighters, would come down on the Russian Army.

    • @therealdaveseaman
      @therealdaveseaman 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Really?
      So putler is preparing to attack NATO according to you?
      ok.
      I'd like to hear more about that from a well informed person like yourself.
      Any idea how they were planning to win such a conflict? Are they planning to conquer all that NATO territory?
      I mean, I guess they have to if they don't want NATO to keep on defending itself against ruzzian aggression, right?
      Also, the economy is the size of that of Spain.
      Any idea how the kremlin is supposed to keep a war like that funded?
      The soviet union needed the allies to finance their war effort, seems to me the current kremlin regime has a lot less resources.
      Anyway, here's a dose of reality for you.
      Air Force - -
      Total aircraft 20,633 4,182
      Fighters / interceptors 3,398 773
      Ground attack aircraft 1,108 744
      Transport aircraft 1,506 444
      Special aircraft (e.g reconnaissance) 970 147
      Tanker aircraft 615 19
      Total helicopters 8,614 1,531
      Guess which side has the first row of numbers.
      Spoiler, it ain't ruzzia.
      Good luck with the world war dreams, igor ! 😗

    • @jampie2789
      @jampie2789 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      ​@@fernandoc.dacruz1162 you listen to much NATO propaganda. After USA, Russia has the biggest airforce.

  • @ursulaeissner1743
    @ursulaeissner1743 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +22

    Why Russia is INCAPABLE of Air Superiority over Ukraine ? What are you smoking ?

    • @Tod_oMal
      @Tod_oMal 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      Exactly.

  • @3r1cratpool22
    @3r1cratpool22 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    what???? you live in a parallel world? 😂😂😂 cant believe...

  • @bazz6490
    @bazz6490 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    I'm getting tired of this stupid question. Why can't they why haven't they etc.

    • @BrassLock
      @BrassLock 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Why, oh why are you getting tired Bazz?

    • @jampie2789
      @jampie2789 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Because the critical questions are only ask about Russia. If you ask a critical question about NATO or Ukraine they call you immediatly a Putin lover instead of answering the question, just to disqualify your legitimate question.

    • @MICLakVER
      @MICLakVER 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@jampie2789 exactly this channel are backed by westren media so they always point toward russia but thier changing weapon turning failed weapon and they cant question on west weapons tall claims

  • @zukislumber
    @zukislumber 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    They’re saving fighters and bombers for NATO

  • @hoodintellect313
    @hoodintellect313 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    More Misleading Information ℹ️

  • @alexwhite5258
    @alexwhite5258 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Гитлер тоже думал что мы отсталый народ неспособный сопротивляться

  • @tasoszonios5021
    @tasoszonios5021 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Maybe because 32 countries keep sending aa weapons to ukraine

  • @dwijfouzdar1377
    @dwijfouzdar1377 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    Think not of this war, as though it is existential war for them, but not the one that required Russian arsenal rebalancing/ planning but think of a major conflict with nato or china or Japan or USA:-
    1. SAMs make manned aircrafts useless over hostile enemy space. It is a trend already clearly established. Aircrafts are mere missile trucks to carry missiles fast to their launch location from far off storage fields. It is most significant for Russian doctrine, huge landmass, large tactical nuclear stockpile, Huge HEU stockpile to make nukes from. The role of airforce is a. To survive thus air to air capabilities I. E. Defeat enemy air raids that penetrate b. To deliver/launch tactical nukes 2000 km away from the zone of destruction that's it nothing more.
    B. The stealth is not that necessary for the aircraft itself but for the smaller missile like kh 102. With a real reasonable cost of
    5 million each, range of 3000km and a 200 kiloton warhead made from just 40kg HEU Russia can place an army of 6000 such nuclear missiles at cost of just 30 billion dollars in just 10 years from merely 240 kT of HeU which is 1/3 of their total stockpile. A perfect number of tactical nukes to prevent any invasion dispersed all over russia and deliverable at supersonic speed from anywhere to anywhere. Thus a perfect defence shield against any conventional war.
    3. This is a war to break the nationalistic ukrainian will power and to keep that nation from ever be able to be a staging ground for Nato offensive. Without breaking the back of Russian armed forces. It is meant to be fought with artillery. And such massive bloodshed is expected in contested space, kherson city beyond dnipro or Kharkhiv were not contested at all, they were given up on first sight of trouble. drones and asymmetrical warfare capabilities make Blitz impossible in contested spaces.

    • @BosMass617
      @BosMass617 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Great comment

  • @kongphallack7954
    @kongphallack7954 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    It's hard to imagine that Russia can fight not only with Ukraine but also the NATO bloc & US , no country in the world can fight like Russia does,, Russia knows how to manage this conflict because Russia never regards this fight as war, just a special military operation in Ukraine

  • @panderjitsinghvv8199
    @panderjitsinghvv8199 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    I regard everything I read, hear and see about every war as propaganda.

    • @vincentconti-jb3hd
      @vincentconti-jb3hd 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Good thinking.... especially on TH-cam

    • @RunPJs
      @RunPJs 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Researchers study and try to understand wars for centuries to come.
      It's very very hard to get to the truth

    • @recoil53
      @recoil53 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Why bother believing there is a war?

    • @zov_tv
      @zov_tv 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      and this video you're watching now is total bullshit propaganda that's for sure

    • @Iv4Bez
      @Iv4Bez 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@recoil53 you personally saw Putin? No. He doesn't exist.

  • @jetcrisostomo9325
    @jetcrisostomo9325 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    If the Russia is incapable of air superiority why is the Ukraine is asking for F16🤣

    • @Mattiedamacdaddy
      @Mattiedamacdaddy 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      How much college have you had?

  • @meejinhuang
    @meejinhuang 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Fear of MANPADs.

  • @deochlaidir4042
    @deochlaidir4042 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    Guys, we are detected the F-35 perfectly well in Syria.

    • @recoil53
      @recoil53 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Detected and being able to target at range are oh so different.
      Stealth is not about complete lack of detection but the difficulty in being targeted.

    • @hanselchristopher534
      @hanselchristopher534 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@recoil53 it has been targeted to turkish military have claimed that they were to able to target one

    • @recoil53
      @recoil53 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@hanselchristopher534 From what range? I said difficulty, not impossibility.
      And on what equipment? It wasn't on that Russian stuff they have.

    • @nashazzi8399
      @nashazzi8399 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@recoil53 F35 not so invisible like west hype it to be. If turkey can detect it when it in syrian, it pretty much not invisible. If radar can detect, it can be shot. Hence the reason why they SEAD/DEAD the air space 1st.

  • @aerohk
    @aerohk 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Would be interesting to see more air combat actions. Seems like there hasn't been any documented air to air fight in the past 2 years.

  • @cerita_kang_kebon_420
    @cerita_kang_kebon_420 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Because lancet can do most aircraft attacks...
    Also much much cheaper😂

  • @gentianm5450
    @gentianm5450 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

    They have air superiority truth be told.

    • @marsmotion
      @marsmotion 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      agree this is very outdated or false info in that specific. they took out 5 patriot systems easily. by missiles alone they control ukraines airspace. i bet nato air cant operate in ukraine.

    • @JP-qb3ny
      @JP-qb3ny 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      With drones, yes

    • @shivanshna7618
      @shivanshna7618 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Local yes full no

    • @Ulises-Gonzalez-3131
      @Ulises-Gonzalez-3131 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@JP-qb3ny and kinzals

    • @hannibalwantsahuggrande3433
      @hannibalwantsahuggrande3433 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@marsmotionYep. More USA/Ukraine propaganda for the dumb masses.

  • @whitehorse1092
    @whitehorse1092 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Your blindness doesn't give you a chance to understand that Russia doesn't treat Ukraine as Vietnam as you did

  • @scothf1273
    @scothf1273 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Wtf they have air superiority thats why ukraine is asking for f-16s and more air defense systems.

    • @levilastun829
      @levilastun829 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The Russians have air superiority near the front lines, not deep in Ukrainian territory. They are asking for F-16's and air defense systems because the Soviet equipment they curelty have is getting grinded down little by little until they have nothing left

  • @Gabberag
    @Gabberag 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    when you look at what America was able to do in Desert Storm and compare it to what Russia has done in Ukraine. Weird

  • @africadeclassified
    @africadeclassified 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This even raises questions about Russian ability to deliver nukes in case they decide to use them.

  • @user-uh5uo9np6n
    @user-uh5uo9np6n 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Военной техники и оружия НАТО гораздо больше, чем говорят. Кроме этого воюют не только добровольцы, но и специалисты НАТО. Работает разведка НАТО. Войска Украины управляются силами НАТО. Если бы мы воевали только против Украины, то уже давно бы добились поставленных целей. Нельзя воевать против ядерной державы! Рано или поздно самое главное оружие может быть применено. Сначало маломощное по военным базам и аэродромам. И ничего НАТО не сделает. Иначе будет серьёзная война. Смысла нет. И Россия всё равно победит.

    • @drpeterc12
      @drpeterc12 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Don't waste your time replying to this stupid type of propaganda, which is bombarding the west. All we hear from our elites is how stupid russians are. The opposite is true, western diplomats and politicians have all been bought by their media oligarchs.

    • @JP-qb3ny
      @JP-qb3ny 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      If it turns into ww3 Russia won’t win but neither NATO. We all lose when it comes to nuclear Armageddon

  • @batmin6446
    @batmin6446 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Superiority??? Please explane how many military air ports are left in Ukraine,its essential for landing, or air superiority is Kind of kamicaze job?

  • @CliveBarnettrecluse
    @CliveBarnettrecluse 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I learned a new military term from some American commentators. " Projection "

  • @internetisinteresting7720
    @internetisinteresting7720 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I have just watched a video from Deutsche Welle, saying that Ukraine is using helicopters because they have no air force since a year ago

  • @remisofola5703
    @remisofola5703 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Propaganda nonsense.

  • @craig4867
    @craig4867 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I'm on the battlefield and this guy is wrong! Ukraine has lost over 325,000 soldiers and compare that to Vietnam! 🇷🇺

    • @MasterAquatics
      @MasterAquatics 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      What's it like over there? Fill us in

    • @craig4867
      @craig4867 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@MasterAquatics . You don't want to know! It's a meat grinder and the amount of dead bodies is beyond comprehension and there's not much left of Ukraine, most of it has been obliterated and this war is going to continue as long as NATO and United States keeps supplying Ukraine with weapons and they don't want it to end, it's a proxy war and it's not about Ukraine, as far as NATO and United States is concerned, it's about defeating us, Russia as a whole and that's not going to happen! We just want Ukraine to stay neutral and not become a part of NATO and were eliminating the Nazi factions that have taken over Ukraine! We lost 27 million lives in World War 2, meaning Russia, because of the Nazis and we helped the United States defeat the Nazis in World War II and people seem to forget that! 🇷🇺

  • @Ulises-Gonzalez-3131
    @Ulises-Gonzalez-3131 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I don't agree with the aseveration of pilot russians no being well trained, when in reality are top three in the world, having 12 years of experience in Syria where they eliminated thousands of nato and arabig funded terrorists trying to topple syrian president Assad. Also constantly train protecting their huge territories from marauding natostani fighters.
    The other thing in which I disagree is on their fight against ukronazi fighters and sams, because the first ones are already destroyed and the ones that appear are recent arrivals, which russians destroy on the first or second attempt to attact the fighting line, and also the sams which survive a little longer because the all nato AWACS 24/7 fly near the border sending the radar information to help them remain in pasive mode and to turn only when russian and helicopter planes are in their range. But the natostani manpads or stingers arenow unable to take down the ka-52 because uses the EWS Vitobsk 25 that deflected over a dozen of those misiles, ukro nazi missiles very near depleted in this weeks, so the end is near for the total air supremacy. So the few mambas that the french will send this days won't last the next month, and that's why the natostani mafia are doing this month their massive air excercise on that region, trying to frigthen the russians.

  • @John-is9nj
    @John-is9nj 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Maybe, because they are only able to produce a few number of high-performance planes ? Like the D-Day deception that allies played, who knows how many of their high-performance planes actually exist but are old planes made to look like them..

    • @hannibalwantsahuggrande3433
      @hannibalwantsahuggrande3433 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Shut up

    • @recoil53
      @recoil53 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      A lot of their newer air frames are just Soviet air frames that have been modernized a bit.

  • @pik6921
    @pik6921 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This is NOT the war that Russia needs to attrition it's air offensive capability - that phase of the war, can only begin if Ukraine receives more advanced western assets, or the war escalates to include Nato direct involvement....
    There is a good reason why nobody is giving Ukraine the same assets-the strategic logic remain consistent across all the involved parties...

  • @dodicicilindri
    @dodicicilindri 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I don't understand why nobody is pointing out as a reason for such a failure, the fact Ukraine is backed by USA surveillance and intelligence, most probably NATO RC-135 fleet, MQ-9 drones and probably satellite intelligence are monitoring any RU aircraft round the clock. In addition, air defence is quite massive and mobile, and RU has failed in SEAD operations since the beginning. It's misleading to refer to air campaign against Iraq or Afghanistan, much weaker opponents and not backed by any major power. Also use of stealth planes such as F-117, helped a lot the USA. Russia does not or cannot use the SU-57 into Ukraine skies.

  • @joem0088
    @joem0088 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Ukraine's air defense advantage is that it has Russia made S300, BUK, and Pantsir AD systems.

  • @jdogdarkness
    @jdogdarkness 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I think this anybody else notice hiw MilitaryTV perpetuates w.e the latest Russian propaganda talking points are? 3 videos about Loepard being destroyed in a month....

  • @IgorChudov
    @IgorChudov 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The music is too loud and makes it impossible to listen to your presentation

  • @marcelodearaujoeliseu3113
    @marcelodearaujoeliseu3113 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Very good!

  • @jdogdarkness
    @jdogdarkness 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Btw, its not S.D.E.A.D..... its S.E.A.D- Suppression of Enemy Air Defenses. Or D.E.A.D-Destruction of Enemy Air Defense.

  • @devologue
    @devologue 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    As an American, it's your duty to find why it failed so many times over the decades

  • @Tala2n
    @Tala2n 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The air is probably the biggest russian advantage because of the aircraft count. The ground is full of UK forces, so russians can't win without the air IMO.
    USA has a long experience in bombing things. Syria was not a good training for russians because the opposition wasn't equipped.

  • @frederick6570
    @frederick6570 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Is Russia even trying to take over the whole country? I thought it was eastern ukraine support

  • @scootanow85
    @scootanow85 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    They don’t have modern jets or anything give me a break

  • @dineshsingh-gb6un
    @dineshsingh-gb6un 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Air dominance kese hojayegi agar missile Ukraine ko milti rahegi to

  • @Schwarzwolf88
    @Schwarzwolf88 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Because they didn't sent them 🤷🏻‍♂️✌🏼 ask me for more tips and hints 😂

  • @unscinfinitydropshippalmer6146
    @unscinfinitydropshippalmer6146 หลายเดือนก่อน

    what are you talking about..... you can just send jets just for the sake.... they are pretty much using their aviation those 500 FAB boms ain't dropping themselves and those KA helicopters are pretty much not piloting themselves either.... like the ukranians said... this war is different its not afghan war where you fight BC military technology.. its simply useless comparing the US war strategies to ukrain those two are just soo different......

  • @kristianndrsn
    @kristianndrsn 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Got nothing to do with losing planes to himars

  • @Fran-ct4kb
    @Fran-ct4kb 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    1000’s of manpads, multiple types of Mobile sam systems!

  • @jdogdarkness
    @jdogdarkness 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Listen to how he gushes over Russian tech, don't listen to me, look for yourself in the future. Keep it in mind & decide for yourself.

  • @johndao5870
    @johndao5870 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It's like playing basketball.

  • @ioanbota9397
    @ioanbota9397 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I like this powerful fighters jets

  • @vincentconti-jb3hd
    @vincentconti-jb3hd 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What i want to know "is god on our side"? Cause if he isn't....we are screwed!! What side are we on anyway....gotta love the music!!! Da da...da da....dadadada!!!! If you are reading my nonsense....you deserve it!!!!

  • @blloom2270
    @blloom2270 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Donba? Wtf

  • @edwardwongiii2229
    @edwardwongiii2229 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    A big mystery. Why does the Western Propaganda Machine fail to see that the only losses of Russian aircraft were due to air defense but at the same time, the Russian air force has yet to lose a single air-to-air combat interdiction. The Ukrainians have excellent pilots, but their equipment and their level of competence is no match for the Russians. And if Ukraine gets the F-16, they will all suffer the same fate. Game, set, match.

  • @eliaswikman-kb8vv
    @eliaswikman-kb8vv 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Wars take time, the americans would have just as much problems against a nation with more modern weapons

  • @mohammadtoficmohammad3594
    @mohammadtoficmohammad3594 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I don't know why maybe because of corruption, nato weapons are too expensive, nato will not be able to sustain war because of huge expenses needed for their weapons, Tyrkia proved that simple cheap weapon are most efficient and effective against Russia in Syria, azrabijan and Libya

  • @StPiter111
    @StPiter111 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Where are Ukranian air force? 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

  • @juancarrero6652
    @juancarrero6652 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    In fighting with pregozin isn't helping.

  • @abdulmuizz4887
    @abdulmuizz4887 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Lmao...this is stale tbh

  • @mccormyke
    @mccormyke 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Perhaps the Russian Aur Firce has the sanest & most intelkigent officers. Why luse my life & a billion dollar aircraft fir Putin"s foolishness .
    Out live putin & hope for someone rational.

  • @2Sage-7Poets
    @2Sage-7Poets 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    you mean to defeat russia.. ukraine needs long range missiles? but are they allowed to attack russia using such weapon? or they are waiting for the right time to attack russia together with NATO..

  • @user-rr2gt3cg3i
    @user-rr2gt3cg3i 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Когда взлетают русские самолеты, то США тут же передают информацию со спутников и самолетов разведчиков для Украины. Самолеты разведки постоянно в воздухе над черным морем и около западных границ Украины.

  • @unscinfinitydropshippalmer6146
    @unscinfinitydropshippalmer6146 หลายเดือนก่อน

    this is not top gun. stop smoking that thing boehh cs they really have airsuperiority AF

  • @dawitdima-se4vj
    @dawitdima-se4vj 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Ukraine was fortified with air defence systems for the last 9 years by NATO

    • @MICLakVER
      @MICLakVER 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thats why patriot and iris-t blown by kinzal and lancel drone 🤣

  • @Tod_oMal
    @Tod_oMal 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    How to tell 10 min of BS in a 10 min video.
    This is the example. Zero understanding of war strategy and zero knowledge about the capabilities of the enemy.
    Truly laughable.

    • @wojciechkarwowski7302
      @wojciechkarwowski7302 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @@PS2_Best_Era In a year they almost destroyed second biggest army in Europe, with very big number of tanks, artillery, much more soldiers, and only ones in Europe with fighting experience and NATO equipment which value is around whole yearly Ru military budget! And remeber that Ru did only one mobilisation, before they fought with around 100 000 troops + LNR/DPR + Wagners. UA had at least 1 000 000. Count how many soldiers per day You have to kill/wound to achieve victory. This are just staggering numbers. It is just unthinkable that peace which was almost signed around march last year was broken by the west, Boris mainly. That is just pure scandal, all what is, could be prevented with those peace negotiations.
      And have in mind, current UA offensive is done with NATO equipment, and NATO training... look how it goes, they didn`t even reached FIRST line of defense. And there is quite few more of them in line.

    • @Tod_oMal
      @Tod_oMal 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@PS2_Best_Era Well, I have never heard that the Russians are in any kind of hurry (And I am watching the war closely). I get the sense that they are extremely happy going slow, because the slower they go, the more enemy hardware they destroy. I will tell you what Prigoschin said in an interview: "Our goal is not to hurry up and conquer territory, our goal is to first destroy the enemy, when that is done, we can go on and get their territory without effort and risks". I think what he sais makes total sense. Never underestimate the Russian Military doctrine.

    • @Ulises-Gonzalez-3131
      @Ulises-Gonzalez-3131 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Yea, I also don't agree with his aseveration of pilot russians no being well trained, when in reality are top three in the world, having 12 years of experience in Syria where they eliminated thousands of nato and arabig funded terrorists trying to topple syrian president Assad. Also constantly train protecting their huge territories from marauding natostani fighters.
      The other thing in which I disagree is on their fight against ukronazi fighters and sams, because the first ones are already destroyed and the ones that appear are recent arrivals, which russians destroy on the first or second attempt to attact the fighting line, and also the sams which survive a little longer because the all nato AWACS 24/7 fly near the border sending the radar information to help them remain in pasive mode and to turn only when russian and helicopter planes are in their range. But the natostani manpads or stingers arenow unable to take down the ka-52 because uses the EWS Vitobsk 25 that deflected over a dozen of those misiles, ukro nazi missiles very near depleted in this weeks, so the end is near for the total air supremacy. So the few mambas that the french will send this days won't last the next month, and that's why the natostani mafia are doing this month their massive air excercise on that region, trying to frigthen the russians.

    • @Ulises-Gonzalez-3131
      @Ulises-Gonzalez-3131 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@PS2_Best_Era , natostani mafia spent seven years arming and training the ukronazi regime since 2015, when they were forced to sign the Minsk 2 peace agreements with the two "rebel" republic of Donbass that wanted more autonomy from central government. And you forget that the ukros where pumped with over one hundred billions since last year to buy the conscience of those people, not counting the help received of those migrating to european countries.

  • @milekragulj325
    @milekragulj325 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I don't think that Ukraine can fly clode to Frontline.

  • @DiSSchwarz
    @DiSSchwarz 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Learning reason of aggression NATO

  • @DavidCooper-rl2ue
    @DavidCooper-rl2ue 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    You might be giving Russia an idea and they will probably see this

  • @familypowergroup
    @familypowergroup 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Great content, thank you 🙏🏻

  • @morexbong6980
    @morexbong6980 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Russia will definitely lose this war

  • @rogeriodearaujobonito6377
    @rogeriodearaujobonito6377 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    IMAGINE SOME F22 RAPTORS WITH HIPERSONIC METEOR MISSILES WITH RANGE OF 300 KMS AND MISTERY IS SOLVED !

    • @DOOMSDAYD-KILLS-EVERYONE
      @DOOMSDAYD-KILLS-EVERYONE 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      What an ass whooping it wood be.

    • @nam3less14
      @nam3less14 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@DOOMSDAYD-KILLS-EVERYONEF-22s would all burn and then you would have a list of excuses.

    • @umu8934
      @umu8934 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      LMAO hypersonic meteor bvraam😹😹😹😹 do your research.... Meteor is just supersonic AFAIK 😸🙃😜

    • @jampie2789
      @jampie2789 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@umu8934MUAHAHAHA!!! Just let them believe what they want. They act like toddlers believing in fairy tales😂😂

    • @DanAth-il1uq
      @DanAth-il1uq 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      You can do some good imagining in Arma 3. Western weapons are showing they aren’t that good against a “peer” opponent 😂😂😂😂

  • @jakovskaro8224
    @jakovskaro8224 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I say this once again. Change researcher!
    This one is crap.

  • @likemostthings
    @likemostthings 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    "limited gains"??? They have 1/3 of the country... the part with all the resources.

  • @zero1breaker
    @zero1breaker 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Another channel already said Russia doesn't have enough aircraft to cover the large area of Ukrainia.

  • @abdirahmanabdullahi9087
    @abdirahmanabdullahi9087 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Are you neuteral or pro-ukraine

  • @1981page
    @1981page 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Modern jets? They are using satellite navigation from cars and on their mobile phones 😂

  • @ChristianGustafson
    @ChristianGustafson 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Jeez, the Russians are the good guys in this.

    • @recoil53
      @recoil53 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Not in any way imaginable.

    • @ChristianGustafson
      @ChristianGustafson 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@recoil53 Bet you got your booster, too. The West is bankrupt and must loot Asia or implode.

  • @dufifa
    @dufifa 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    It gets, that's why Ukraine crying to give f16 her

    • @zamraaj0652
      @zamraaj0652 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      F16 are not likely to fare any better than Leopard 2 - the much touted unstoppable juggernaut.

  • @lonesomealeks4206
    @lonesomealeks4206 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Bullschlacha.

  • @brightside4459
    @brightside4459 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Lie

  • @antoonvugts7484
    @antoonvugts7484 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Desinformation

  • @iviciaable
    @iviciaable 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    What is Air superiority? when engaged with adversary planes and the opponent have no quantities left? Ukraine have 20-30 left only at its best..around 80% were destroyed in air and mostly on ground during the first week or two of the war..
    Air superiority is to fly over Kyiv and other big cities to bomb targets there!? why you would risk planes in a heavily SAM guarded areas when you can use long range cruise missiles, drones and most of all hypersonic missiles!?
    Russians on the other hand fly something like hundred sorties per day but in a close combat support missions because it is the thing which matters the most currently and they have no opponents on the other side as most of the Ukranian SAM systems are around the big cities and outside the range of the russian artillery and outside of those nasty smart guided drones like Lancet and similar..
    So my point is, when I see a videos like this and I see it quite frequently lately, it makes me laugh honestly as it has nothing to do with reality and with military logic, amateurism at its best..
    Peace in Ukraine!

  • @shinderpal6908
    @shinderpal6908 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Stay strong russia 🇷🇺

  • @shadracksteve3712
    @shadracksteve3712 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Western propaganda

  • @px7321
    @px7321 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Bro i have watched your videos and found interesting and informative please compare new Jets of 4.5 gen of India and Pakistan and compare the overall fleet it's much demanding

    • @emzee586
      @emzee586 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Really? Why don’t we compare the slingshot against the bow?

  • @anthonypickup8697
    @anthonypickup8697 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    They have. The alligators are running amok on the front lines.

  • @m80116
    @m80116 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The biggest mystery is not why Russia has no air superiority, but HOW BADLY the western support turned out to be for Ukraine if they have NO NAVY and they can't even control their own skies... which can only be considered "contested" at best.
    The western governments after failing to recognize the war and turning a blind eye on it after 2014 are risking HEAVY CONSEQUENCES for the European continent. And they still FAIL to acknowledge... stepping up support which is still INSUFFICIENT when it's clear they should have sent in troops and all kind of equipment much earlier.

    • @Mattiedamacdaddy
      @Mattiedamacdaddy 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You’re too ignorant to realize you’re ignorant, why would the west give them F16s they can’t even operate and maintain, who’s giving them these F16s they don’t grow on trees

  • @mitropoulosilias
    @mitropoulosilias 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    just yesterday Russia used Su-35 to bomb targets in ukraine.. no problem

  • @ashokindian36
    @ashokindian36 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    RIP UKRAINIANS 😂🎉

  • @jijaji5363
    @jijaji5363 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    SALAVA RUSSIA 🇷🇺

  • @m1n5dmcs
    @m1n5dmcs 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    bruh maybe f-16 would lost again like how they did to the leo 2a6

    • @Refinement99
      @Refinement99 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Russia has lost T-80s, T-90s etc. tanks too. What did some expect, that 0 Leopard tanks will go bust? Is it made from alien metal armor?

    • @alsa3ka166
      @alsa3ka166 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​​@@Refinement99ew years back i had conversation with some idiot about the Abrams and kornets
      I told him a modren kornets will pen the Abrams everywhere except the front of the turret
      And hes stupidity told me the kornets will not pen anywhere except the back of the turret
      Now we see what happened to the leaopards 2a6s
      Wish some pepole argue that its better then abrames
      I was right lol

    • @alsa3ka166
      @alsa3ka166 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@Refinement99i dont blame them they are the same pepole that believe that ther more than two genders 😂

  • @jijbuizen
    @jijbuizen 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Z
    Z
    Z

  • @dineshsingh-gb6un
    @dineshsingh-gb6un 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Air dominance kese hojayegi agar missile Ukraine ko milti rahegi to

  • @kristianndrsn
    @kristianndrsn 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Got nothing to do with losing planes to himars

  • @dineshsingh-gb6un
    @dineshsingh-gb6un 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Air dominance kese hojayegi agar missile Ukraine ko milti rahegi to