Poilievre kicked out of parliament for calling Trudeau a “wacko”
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 29 เม.ย. 2024
- Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre was kicked out of the House of Commons during question period on Tuesday after he called Prime Minister Justin Trudeau a “wacko.”
“Twenty-two British Columbians have died of drug overdoses, but he continues to allow those drugs to kill the people in our hospitals and on our public transit. When will we put an end to this wacko policy by this wacko prime minister?” Poilievre said.
House Speaker Greg Fergus offered Poilievre multiple chances to withdraw his comments, but the Opposition leader only said that he would replace the word with “radical,” then that he would "simply withdraw and replace" the language with the term "extremist."
Fergus then said the Conservative leader was disregarding the authority of the chair, ordering the Conservative leader to withdraw from parliament for the remainder of the day. All Conservative MPs left the chamber in protest after the incident.
For more info, please go to globalnews.ca/news/10460333/p...
Subscribe to Global News Channel HERE: bit.ly/20fcXDc
Like Global News on Facebook HERE: bit.ly/255GMJQ
Follow Global News on Twitter HERE: bit.ly/1Toz8mt
Follow Global News on Instagram HERE: bit.ly/2QZaZIB
#GlobalNews #Poilievre #Trudeau
Calling Trudeau a 'wacko' is an understatement.
Total projection by Poilievre. He's the wacko! The guy seriously thinks that electricians capture electricity from lightening! He is totally unfit to be PM!
Trudy is betraying Canadians left and right... now immigrants get fast-traced government mortgages, while Canadian students are wlft suffering in debt unable to find decent paying jobs.
Using this ableist language is pre twentieth century.
@@BearbearbearbearbearbearRarrrrwhat
@@nmacesic1 what don’t you understand that you can’t clear up with an ai service?
Basically, he said what 90% of Canadians are thinking.
The other 10% just don't think at all.
I was thinking a few things far worse than 'wacko.'
Not so fast there billy-ray
😂😂😂
Only in your delusions. Maybe 40-50% think that.
no he is not! 90% of Canadians have controll of name calling you wako!
Whacko is probably the nicest word that most Canadians would use to describe Trudeau !
I agree ☝️
That's a solid and overlooked point. Given the bottom-dwelling quality of turdeau's character, "wacko " as it was used, was quite complementary. Thanks for the perspective.
most Canadians don't talk like HIll Billys
@@judynagy8612 most Canadians don’t support incompetence and corruption either, yet here you are.
That you or “most Canadians “ feel entitled to casually throw around ableist tropes is exactly the problem here. Time to grow up. It’s the twenty first century now.
Oh please after all the names Trudeau called the people who wouldn’t get the jab ….
Still unvaccinated, still alive. Sadly however my friend is not alive: died at the age of 27 of a brain aneurysm a few weeks after getting vaccinated and boosted (she had refused to be jabbed throughout most of the pandemic but had to be vaccinated and boosted for a job)
Come on!!
I died 4 times during the winters of severe illness an death. 😂
What name ???
never forget, never forgive
Fergus is completely BIASED!
No, he's definitely not at fault here. Perhaps a bit of research into parliamentary procedures, member conduct, and permissible behaviour would shed some light on the matter for you.
@@cleopatrasnile Nice try! He didn’t use those same rules on Trudeau! You’re obviously a Liberal supporter!
Don't be racist Bob@@bobskaftfeld5611
@@cleopatrasnile he withdrew the term wacko and replaced it with extremist yet Fergus insists he ONLY withdraws.
This is extremely biased because there alot of parliamentary words that you can use so that the statement becomes parliamentary
Poilievre could have simply withdrawn the comment. There are rules in the house and Poilievre must follow them while in the house. Simple.
Fergus has clearly lost control of parliament. He needs to be removed from his job. His Liberal bias is showing. He even breaks the rules of the House and calls Pierre by name. Sooooo much wrong there.
And what about Poilievre acting like a child?
What Global doesn't show is Trudeau labelling Pierre extremist in his previous comment, which is why Pierre changed it to "Extremist" to make a point, of the bias this SPeaker was showing.....SINCE WHEN, can you call names like Extremist in parliament.....ONLY SINCE A LIBERAL APPOINTED SPEAKER has taken that seat has no CLUE what unbiased is, obviously. They also don't show the full conservative party get up and leave, costing Canadians HOW MUCH MONEY FOR THAT DAY, and conveniently didn't report on that either, or get a financial count on how much money it cost and how much time was left on question-answer period that his bias has cost us all with his Liberal Egomaniac Outburst. This guy's days are numbered for sure, as he doesn't seem to get much except how to sit and grin like a hog at the trough, that Pierre is trying to rectify. Wacko, I can assure you isn't the word the rest of us Canadians are using for Trudeau..... When he can Label truckers Extremist Nazis in one sentence, in Parliament, then in his next show he invites a Nazi and applauds him from the Ukraine, there is a bit of a bias right there. That alone should have gotten us a vote, if it was 20 to 30 years ago it may have gotten us an execution for treason. If it was in France they would have brought back the Guillotine, as the last guy in 1979 who was executed on it, likely did far less to deserve it than Trudeau has done to this nation.
@@thedevil4981 Strange, the name calling went both ways - wouldn't that make them both childish and both, should have been removed...
The Speaker is responsible for maintaining order in the Chamber by ensuring that the House’s rules and practices are respected. Which they clearly were not by Pierre Poilievre! The Speaker’s disciplinary powers are intended to ensure that the debate remains focused. The right to speak is tempered by the written rules of the House which, in general, impose limitations on what may be said and when, by whom and for how long.
The proceedings of the House are based on a long-standing tradition of respect for the integrity of all Members. Pierre Poilievre consistently overlooks the importance of civility and respectful discourse, opting instead for vitriolic and disrespectful remarks.
The use of offensive, provocative or threatening language in the House is strictly forbidden. Personal attacks, insults, and obscenities are not in order. The rules of the House are based on the idea that elected officials should work to maintain a sense of respect for all members of Parliament. The Speaker, along with the other presiding officers, is responsible for enforcing these long-standing rules.
@@thedevil4981 From the CBC: "Before Poilievre's removal, Fergus had Conservative MP Rachael Thomas removed from the chamber after she shouted at him and called him "a disgrace" for not immediately demanding that Trudeau withdraw his comment about Poilievre being "spineless." "
He's not wrong
Seems like Pierre Poilievre's track record speaks louder than his words. From combative exchanges with reporters to cozying up to far-right groups, his behaviour reeks of extremism. With a departure from Canadian norms of decency and democracy, it's no wonder some fear a 'neo-Mulroney' era under his leadership. His populist rhetoric and divisive antics paint a clear picture: Pierre Poilievre embodies the very definition of 'wacko' and 'extremist'.
My thoughts exactly 😂
Said the extremist Con.
you are wrong wako
Trudeau isnt a wacko hes an absolute nutcase and an extremist, defending him now indicates he is not alone on those matters.
What is wrong with the word Wacko. PM has used worse words and never gets called out. This speaker is the most annoying, bias speaker I have ever witnessed.
it's semantically wrong : whether or not a person is « wacko » (or any similar label) cannot be established by experience… at best, one can says that a person has an history of behaving in a manner that they, or other people, deem is « wacko, » but even that doesn't imply that each and every action they have ever taken, and/or that they will take in the future, can de facto be deemed « wacko »… and that's the whole point : the problem is never the person themselves, but what they do/don't do or what they say/don't say… and thus the problem here is not whether or not PM Trudeau « is wacko, » the problem, at least according to MP Poilievre, is that the policy « is wacko »… so, for his criticism to be legitimate, MP Poilievre should target the policy, and not the person of the PM, but he doesn't… he rather insists, even after being offered several opportunities to withdraw the personal attacks, and repeats the offense using different labels…
moreover, personal attacks, such as name calling, are a well-known logical fallacy that consists in trying to discredit the person rather than properly refuting their points, or in the present instance, policies… and obviously that is fallacious because it doesn't actually address the points themselves… and ultimately that amounts to fooling oneself, as the points haven't been properly refuted, and thus the problem, and the burden of addressing it, remain whole…
also, that a person resorts to such fallacious methods suggests that they don't really have any sort of substantial argument to support their criticism… if they did, they would simply have to present those arguments, and thus properly refute the points of the other person, and that would be the end of the story… truth needs no artifice…
why all of this is important has to do with order, and how order is related to personal well-being… basically, allowing falsehood into one's mind is courting internal trouble, and thus upholding truth is a requirement of the physiology of human consciousness…
« To conceive order, to return to order, to realize order in oneself, around oneself, by means of oneself, this is aesthetic and moral beauty, it is well-being, it is what ought to be. » ― Henri-Frédéric Amiel
that being said, personally i typically lean towards the left, but as you pointed out, PM Trudeau has also made similar mistakes in the past, for instance during the last federal campaign when he quite spectacularly insulted people who were refusing vaccination…
it would be nice if the people who want to govern a country would wake up to their duty of leading by example, and at the very least apologize for committing such unjustifiable missteps…
The Canadian parliamentary rules outline conduct guidelines for speaking members:
Members must be in their designated place, stand to be recognized, and address the Chair when speaking.
Attire expectations include jackets, shirts, and ties for male Members.
Freedom of speech is a crucial privilege, but it must be exercised with respect and within the rules.
Members are expected to maintain order and decorum, respecting others' viewpoints and avoiding offensive behaviour or language.
The Speaker plays a vital role in maintaining order and enforcing rules.
These rules are intended to foster respectful and orderly debate within the House-an aspect that seems lost on Pierre Poilievre and his internet trolls.
@@cleopatrasnile calling them « internet trolls » misses the mark though… there's no need to debase oneself in going there… stating the rules would have been sufficient… ✌
@@cleopatrasnile You have any self awareness whatsoever? Now do Trudeau smearing everyone.
Seriously, this is the liberal voter on full display. Zero self awareness.
That you or “most Canadians “ feel entitled to casually throw around ableist tropes is exactly the problem here. Time to grow up. It’s the twenty first century now.
So Polievre gets kicked out of question period for using the same language that Trudeau uses??? How is this democracy??
The house speaker is a liberal
Democracy is mob rule. Its how quebec has been in control since at least 1967.
It's not. It's Canada’s Dictatorship under the Liberal Regime.
That you or “most Canadians “ feel entitled to casually throw around ableist tropes is exactly the problem here. Time to grow up. It’s the twenty first century now.
When you look at it closer it's communism.
Poilievre just increased his votes by hundreds of thousands saying what Canadians have been thinking out loud.
and for standing his ground, even if it meant he would be removed for the day! That's a guy who won't be intimidated and the kind of leader we need now that the country is in the toilet.
Pierre was telling the truth and he got kicked out of her house 🏠
He was speaking like a child and he was kicked out of the house.
@@northgoneCan you elaborate what you're saying? 😅 Your comment doesn't even make sense.
Insulting someone in order to prove your point, isn’t professional in a debate setting. Period. Not that hard to understand.
@@oliviadutta7991It does. Children speak with emotions. Adults speak with rational since they understand the repercussions of their words.
Trudeau is 100% a wacko!!! And Fergus is 100% biased. Who agree’s with me? Pierre for PM!
That you or “most Canadians “ feel entitled to casually throw around ableist tropes is exactly the problem here. Time to grow up. It’s the twenty first century now.
@@BearbearbearbearbearbearRarrrr
Justin calls Pierre "Shameful" and "spineless"
Justin then calls Pierre a "white supremacist"
Fergus does nothing.
Pierre says Trudeau's Canadian killing drug policy is "wacko"
Fergus throws Pierre out.
You can't have different rules for both sides of the house.
(another YTer)
@@BearbearbearbearbearbearRarrrr There is nothing casual about accuratly describing Trudeau as wacko.
@@EyesRed I agree that all of them need an update re decorum, and I think it’s a distraction to think these are partisan issues. The problem tends to flow from discriminatory insurance and judicial environments….thats the “leaky roof” here. Pp and CO’s energy is better spent holding big pharma accountable for drug crises, targeting humane and constructive solutions. Dehumanizing rhetoric indicates a detachment from this reality that we should all be outraged about, I think.
@@jeffspicolli593 there is an ongoing horror that you or any leader feels entitled to throw around ableist rhetoric that dehumanizes people more, rather than getting to the root of a major drug crisis by holding big pharma accountable. That you and “most Canadians “ seem to leap on this discourse as a reason to ignore these facts seems to be where the deficiencies lie, no matter what side you tell yourself you’re on.
So proud of Polilievre... Im glad he didn't back down
He’s a cad and a coward for not recognizing such a malicious error. That you or “most Canadians “ feel entitled to casually throw around ableist tropes is exactly the problem here. Time to grow up. It’s the twenty first century now.
The man with integrity would never allow himself to be removed from the house over a childish taunt. Your admiration is misplaced.
@@BearbearbearbearbearbearRarrrrhuh? Sarcasm?
@@poomanjones4853 this issue is about people dying.
@@northgone there’s no integrity in behaving like children over issues as serious as a full blown health crisis. This sort of distorted sense of entitlement is a very serious problem in Canada.
REMOVE Fergus immediately! The bias is undeniable.
WAHHHHH! THE RULES APPLY TO PP!
Stop with that. I support Pierre poliviere but the speaker needs to be respected. That’s normal and certainly not bias
I don’t want my fellow Canadians to act with emotions just like the usa.
Bias is crystal clear. Fraudeau wasn't asked to withdraw his statement for calling him spineless.
No one is above the rules of parliament. No special treatment.
Fergus has demonstrated incompetence already and FJT !!!
You're either not Canadian or don't understand how our system works. Poilievre was WAY over the line. You don't argue with the speaker.
That's true but the call itself was absurd
@@Caesar316
Another hated “man” in power over us!
@@Caesar316 You want to talk about Canada ?
Tell me about the De Facto Government and Little Child Act Of 1990 Big Mouth
@@Caesar316 The speaker is a liberal and not neutral! Poilievre was no where close to the line that Trudeau set for setting the bar of "name calling" in the house and he never was told to leave. I would say you do not know how the system works or are aloof to how it works or are corrupt and play said system for what it is like Trudeau does
Tax your citizens 20-47%, provide 3rd world healthcare, ask for CRA payment on the day of notice otherwise we are charged 10% interest (more than the bank!). You’ve turned Canada to an absolute circus. And now you kick out the one person who makes sense 👏 👏
Our taxes pay your salary, do your job. You’re embarrassing us, playing childish games while your people are suffering.
I did my taxes yesterday and have to pay $2k back by today otherwise they immediately place a 5% interest on top. I dread to think of the people having to may more. Bunch of thieves.
@@gingeroconnell4634 Well said! 👏 🙌
@@gingeroconnell4634 The raise they give to themselves by approving it themselves while Canadians struggle financially. Even a small corporation will look at your track record and evaluate, if and how much, you are worth a raise. By the lowest standards also, really no one in this parliament should be getting a raise.
Poilievre/Conservatives will have no social health care at all, it will all become pay as you go. Canada is ranked #25 out of 172 countries in the list of highest-taxed countries in the world. Pay your taxes on time and you won't get dinged for interest.
I, concerned you may be a bit misled into thinking this has anything to do with partisanship, and not ableism. Lots of tools to help clarify this for you.
Kicked out because he called JT an extremist while JT can call Pierre a white supremest with no consequence. The speaker of the house must be removed. Also, the speaker needs to stop muting the question period live feed!
He wasn't kicked out because he call JT an extremist, "wacko" was the final straw. PP would not denounce a white supremacist group that he has been courting.
I bet your afraid of rainbows
@@user-cr6rg6nl7j I bet you're afraid of rainbows.
@@WittyUsernamehere when you see them on cars etc
@@WittyUsernamehere you think our rainbows will convert you
All the conservatives walked out soon after.
Super. The less authoritarianism and corporate puppets, the better.
@@raynwolfsbane2084 Yet, you champion the liberals who have made the rich uber rich. Keep ha
Good. I’d be happy if they stayed out.
@MrsRubens they will be the majority government next election
@@MrsRubensfar left wacko 😅
The speaker is a joke.
Pee Pee is the joke!
Fungus is a Liberal joke
The Liberal Speaker is so biased. Kick him out.
Perhaps a crash course in parliamentary decorum and acceptable conduct might illuminate the path to enlightenment for you. Engage in a little literary exploration for the collective benefit of humanity, won't you?
@@cleopatrasnile "Literary Exploration"? It's obvious that you are trying so very hard to sound intelligent, but I suggest that you put aside the thesaurus.
@@karentoffan7027 What they said is indeed 100% accurate and makes complete sense. I do think a literary exploration would benefit you and most other conservatives these days, because if you think elegant words are an attempt to "sound intelligent", well that's honestly more of a self report than anything. People can be intelligent without TRYING to be, that often comes with the territory of knowledge.
Need a tissue?
@@Fenthule I used to teach English literature at at the university level, so please, I don't need the "benefit of literary exploration."
Censorship at its finest 😂 what a joke
Was he arrested?
@@raynwolfsbane2084 Did anyone say they were arrested? Does one need to be arrested for censorship to occur?
@@raynwolfsbane2084 No. He was censored.
It hurts to hear the truth!! He's worse than a wacko! !!
That you or “most Canadians “ feel entitled to casually throw around ableist tropes is exactly the problem here. Time to grow up. It’s the twenty first century now.
What’s not acceptable is you Ferguson and the Liberal/NDP
Canadians will stand behind Pierre and Trudeau will go down in the polls even faster than first anticipated 👏👏
As a Canadian, I don't
Elections will be a fraud
Looks like Fergus was already prepared to do this, having his notes with a post-it readily available. How convenient.
He really did have that paper all ready to go, I said the same thing
He initially asked Pierre to withdraw the “term” and he did. Then he changed his request to withdraw the term”comment” when doesn’t like the replacements. Ha ha. He is clearly biased. Most Canadians will agree with Pollievre that this PM and his drug policy is wacked.
your description is counterfactual : for one, replacing is not withdrawing… replacing a derogatory label with another doesn't really change the gist of the comment : it remains a personal attack… so then MP Poilievre was asked to withdraw the attack, but he refused to comply, and did so on several occasions… that he was kicked out for this is consistent with the rules of the House…
that being said, if the Speaker doesn't apply those rules equally to everyone, including PM Trudeau, as has been suggested elsewhere in this comment section, then there's indeed of problem of bias…
also, MP Poilievre should have directed his criticism towards the policy only… in targeting the person of the PM, he merely shot himself in the foot, as the whole debate was derailed, and the opportunity to show which aspects of the policy are inappropriate has been lost…
@@christopher.stewart So, how about “lying” is that consistent with house rules? Right after Pierre leaves the house Trudeau accuses him of visiting a Diagalon encampment when in fact it was a carbon tax protest. You can quibble over the precious house rules, but any reasonable Canadian knows Trudeau brakes them all the time in the most egregious ways.
@@christopher.stewartdoes anyone even take these debates seriously? They never answer the question, go off on some unrelated tangent with a few insults thrown in and then everyone claps like idiots. This isn't how a meeting gets done in real life. You never see a corporate boardroom act like that. It's all theatre and nothing more.
@@bentooreo9849 you raise some interesting points… though personally, i'd say i don't watch enough of such debates to conclude something like « It's all theatre and nothing more »… but based on those i've seen in the last few years, it seems to occur quite frequently that questions are essentially dodged and never really duly answered, in quite a mechanical manner, as if it were a normal and expected part of the culture… and indeed it often seems that the exercise has become primarily about partisanship, often through making petty personal remarks, than actually trying to find a common ground, which is supposed to be the whole point of these talks…
regardless of which side of the aisle they're on, when elected officials act in such a manner, i find it quite hard to see how they actually serve the people, the ideals of democracy, and at times even their own aims, which they should be able to explain and justify without having to resort to such avoidance strategies… this is clearly not the example i want to be led by, and i doubt that many people do…
@@bentooreo9849 sadly, yes. Some people do take this seriously (some of Canadians)
I can’t believe we live in a world where a man saying it is whako to let people consume hard drugs in public is being censored.
That you or “most Canadians “ feel entitled to casually throw around ableist tropes is exactly the problem here. Time to grow up. It’s the twenty first century now. Why not temper your belief with some fact finding and throw your energy into the root of the issues, rather than the runoff?
@@BearbearbearbearbearbearRarrrr if saying that people should not be allowed to shoot themselves with heroin in libraries or public transits is an ableist trope, then I am guilty.
@@Ralph-id3xg ignoring he root of the issues and refusing to think about preventable solutions , demonizing the run off from serious social issues rather than the source and worse - seeming proud of it all - is quite a legacy for you to stand so strongly on. What makes you feel this entitled?
@@BearbearbearbearbearbearRarrrr 10 years of living in Vancouver, watching the issue exponentially expending and having to deal with the economic, sanitary and safety consequences of it. What about you?
@@Ralph-id3xg I’m tired of seeing even one year go by without addressing the root issues such as the role big pharma, insurers lawyers and adjudicators play in prevention the horrible human outcome.
To me it’s like watching people get upset at the people and wildlife affected by any sort of pollution. You think ableist name calling is a pragmatic next step, or maybe asking pharma for some humane less stigmatizing solutions ?
I see the latter as a more responsible approach than calling one another, out of date names and tropes in this over entitled inefficient system of ours.
I don’t see any of this as partisan as much as cultural.
We can do better. We do in fact have the tools and the resources. What messes with our system is this sort of display of hubris and theatre - no matter who threw the first insult.
All of this on our dime with juicy retirement medical etc benefits. Yep. Something is wrong if we haven’t changed trajectory in ten years. You think dehumanizing people is part of the solution?
Global removes your comments if you say Trudeau loves Hamas
And they love him
And yet. This comment remains
Obviously you are wrong, again.
And YOU have no idea what the Israel / Palestine conflict is all about.
@@DjWellDressedMan Would YOU explain it in 20 words or less?
He's speaking facts.
Which fact?
Trudeau and his campaign of media control... they closed most media outlets over the past decade, and now guess who runs the ones left? Government.
Now it seems like the actual court of Canada can't handle honest truth... seems a little censor-driven in this scenario.
Trumplite PP speaking truth? Not a chance. Maybe invest some time in honing your 'Keyboard Warrior' skills on Google before unleashing your troll-like comments on the internet.
@@cleopatrasnile And what exactly kind of information should he be looking for?
@@cleopatrasnile If Pierre is "Trumplite" he's definitely got my support. I love good leaders.
Canada and the US are a complete mess under their current incompetent fools as their leaders.
Why not show the whole story and rest of what happened global? Like the fact that all the conservatives walked out with him to leave the right of the house empty!
That’s fantastic
Awesome
FJT
...and WJT
Get Trudy out of there.
Unlike CBC, at least you have your comments turned on,,,, I do believe that the Wacko call Pierre "spineless" but FERUS had no issue with this... double standards
Before I start watching this video, Ill comment now..............Let's see how much Global defends Trudeau and goes after Pierre. Trudeau calls Canadians names everyday and Pierre gets kicked out for what? lol
For ableism. There’s some truth in comments about problems with eugenics based ideologies in Canada, as demonstrated by these public servants.
Definitely not funny.
We need impartial speaker
They are supposed to be. This guy is not
We have one. Blaming House Speaker Greg Fergus for Pierre Poilievre's inability to follow parliamentary rules is absurd!
@@cleopatrasnile are you the Sturmabteilung?
Wait, Trudeau called the conservatives Nazis and nothing happened. And Trudeau has said far worse many times. This is hypocritical. Why does Trudeau get a pass all the time???
Because there are obviously unresolved issues with eugenics based ideologies, when a prime minister in waiting, is blissfully unaware of how dehumanizing his comments and perspectives are….perpetually at the run off of a number of preventable problems, rather than the root. Why not put this much energy into holding big pharma accountable for drug crises?
Fascist probably...I don't think nazi suits him just yet. He will always support big business before working class people.
I know Anthony Rota was a liberal speaker who invited that SS guy in the house, but at least he wasn't that biased as this Fergus guy in the HoC
No truer words have been spoken in the house
We are by law required not to smoke tobacco in restricted areas. But hard drugs are acceptable. How stupid is the Trudeau government. Please kick me out also.
My first day of University is tomorrow at Grant MacEwan in Edmonton. I went to pick up my books today. Upon leaving the school, first I saw two people in broad daylight in the bus stop in front of the school smoking meth freely. Then, I was followed by a man all the way to the parking lot where my car was. I told him you need to stop following me. He said I'm robbing you, this is what we're doing right now. He said give me your money. When he was following me he got so close I thought he was gonna whack me over the back of the head. Luckily a school bus showed up and I waved at the driver and he let me in. He told me "sometimes God puts these things in your path to make you aware and to let out the Goliath in you." Its my first day tomorrow and this was my experience. This country is in bad shape.
I'm in Edmonton myself, really sorry to hear you went through that. Edmonton unfortunately has gone downhill extremely fast
@@adamfroggatt7091 thanks fellow Edmontonian ☺️ yeah it has really gone down. Downtown has been bad since I came in 2013 but it’s just filled with crack heads now/meth heads.
Poilievre for PM!
That you or “most Canadians “ feel entitled to casually throw around ableist tropes is exactly the problem here. Time to grow up. It’s the twenty first century now.
Trump lite ..no thanks. pp is secretive about stance on abortion. Fascism on the way.
There needs to be an election.
No, there needs to be an update to the insurance entitle,emits for all these public servants. If we want to take these ableism and drug crisis issues seriously. This theatre is a distraction that roils up ableism (hatred of the mentally ill) - not solutions…like holding big pharma accountable for drug crises.
Pierre pollivere had years to stop Tru dope
@@AnneDeo-uu9nb don’t be fooled into thinking these are partisan issues, or lured into ableism.
We need to get Wakco JT trending
Yes ! New flags need to be made
That you or “most Canadians “ feel entitled to casually throw around ableist tropes is exactly the problem here. Time to grow up. It’s the twenty first century now.
Dont say wacko, but continue to avoid answering any questions you are asked and waste our time and tax dollars. HMMMMMMM if there was no fuss raised about the word wacko being said, would that waste time and tax dollars? When politicians avoid answering questions over and over again, does that waste time and tax dollars?
Ableism isn’t acceptable anywhere. Because there are obviously unresolved issues with eugenics based ideologies, when a prime minister in waiting, is blissfully unaware of how dehumanizing his comments and perspectives are….perpetually at the run off of a number of preventable problems, rather than the root. Why not put this much energy into holding big pharma accountable for drug crises?
Only a wacko legalizes hard drug use. Especially around the areas spoken of.
That you or “most Canadians “ feel entitled to casually throw around ableist tropes is exactly the problem here. Time to grow up. It’s the twenty first century now.
@@BearbearbearbearbearbearRarrrr Lighten up Francis.
@@hebber1961 there’s nothing funny about ableism or eugenics. We don’t have those entitlements. What had you thinking otherwise
@@BearbearbearbearbearbearRarrrr When you're triggered it's hilarious. But sock boy making policy that un-lives people, that's not funny. His policies...un-live people and make people's lives harder. You love that. Sad.
@@hebber1961 your confused, ableist name calling does do anyone any good. That you seem to find these views as an entitlement, suitable for any workplace is what’s truly sad. Do you know how many people are needlessly hurt when you assert dehumanizing views? The data and reporting certainly is in our lexicon, like the mental health commission of Canadas 2008 report that breaks down these issues. Looks like no one in our public workplace’s have read it? Yikes. Willful ignorance is not an entitlement, it’s a deficiency.
Thats the minimum way to describe Mr TurdO.
TurDo!😂 Hadn't heard that before...thanks!
That is so childish.
That you or “most Canadians “ feel entitled to casually throw around ableist tropes is exactly the problem here. Time to grow up. It’s the twenty first century now.
@@MrsRubens TurdO 💩
That’s a leader right there - Peirre Poilivre is my Prime Minister of Canada 🇨🇦 ❤
100 %
Poilievre is totally unqualified & unfit to be PM.
Ableism does not make for reliability. Means there’s some entitlement possibly some delusion in the mix. Might want a rethink. Because there are obviously unresolved issues with eugenics based ideologies, when a prime minister in waiting, is blissfully unaware of how dehumanizing his comments and perspectives are….perpetually at the run off of a number of preventable problems, rather than the root. Why not put this much energy into holding big pharma accountable for drug crises?
Gets kicked out for calling a spade a spade. A wacko a wacko!!! Wadda country we live in.
Yes we have a very serious problem with entitlement and ableism. Because there are obviously unresolved issues with eugenics based ideologies, when a prime minister in waiting, is blissfully unaware of how dehumanizing his comments and perspectives are….perpetually at the run off of a number of preventable problems, rather than the root. Why not put this much energy into holding big pharma accountable for drug crises?
BC is sinking. Come - visit and enjoy a walk in DTES. And bring your kids for a walk.
Check the real estate prices.
Bc is run by commies like California
Yet the speaker of the house breaking ethics is acceptable.
Foxtrot Juliet Tango
Wacko is an understatenent
Ableism is a problem that cannot be overstated.
If the shoe fits
Screw that guy. Good on you Pierre
Pierre for Prime Minister
Pierre Poilievre as Prime Minister? Perish the thought! The man's track record speaks for itself, and it's not exactly a shining beacon of excellence. Comparing him to Andrew Scheer? Well, let's just say it's not a competition for the title of "Worst." LOLLLLLLL
@@cleopatrasnileI would like for you to show me examples. I’ll appreciate it (or you can just tell me to go to Wikipedia)
Kicked out for speaking the truth.
Ableism isn’t truth,it’s hatred.
I can't wait for Trudeau to have to take the walk of shame when Canada votes him out.
Had he started by using the terms “ radical” or “extremist” had he been removed? Very unlikely. Those replacement words were not out of line…So commencing to toss him was unparliamentary.
This Speaker has always been incompetent
Wacko is an understatement
Whacko is pre twentieth century ableist trope, intended to dehumanize and demonize people, effectively roiling up hatred and ignorance to divert from the root of something as serious as a major drug crisis. Why not put the energy into holding insurers and pharma and our judiciary more accountable?
You notice the CBC , CTV and Global don't cover the actual issue that the de criminalization of these drugs
is destroying the lives of Canadians in BC .
Instead , the CBC , CTV and Global focus on all the personal comments in the HoC's .
.
The speaker of the house did the right thing. The House of Commons is not a playground where children are learning language and exchanging inappropriate words because the lack vocabulary. There should be a standard of decorum for these ADULTS. Use of this type of language is a slippery slope to slush language and is NOT appropriate in what is considered a civilized society......unless we are no longer civilized...Hmmm. Canada and Canadians can do better and must do better.
Well said.
Fergus is just Trudeau in his favorite costume.
The truth hurts?
Fergus. Where'd they get this guy? It was a simple matter of expelling Poilievre, however, he had to read it off (complete with post - it note attached) because it seems he was incapable of coming up with the words on his own. Notice, he didn't expel Trudeau for his name - calling of Poilievre.
CTV....why don't you show the rest of the conservatives leaving along with Pierre. Pierre for PM 2025!
Because they’re afraid of talking mean about their prince!
Pierre pollivere is controlled false opposition unfortunately
...but the right-wing, nationalist, conspiracy theorists remarks don't get Jussie T booted out?
Guess we shall have to do that next election.
You’re confused and wreckless to think one form of ignorance justifies another. This is a problem of entitlement we Canadians burden one another with. Because there are obviously unresolved issues with eugenics based ideologies, when a prime minister in waiting, is blissfully unaware of how dehumanizing his comments and perspectives are….perpetually at the run off of a number of preventable problems, rather than the root. Why not put this much energy into holding big pharma accountable for drug crises?
He is 100% biased. If Pierre had used the term "radical" or "extremist" in the first place it would have been fine
So you are kicked out for saying truth now?
Ableism isn’t truth, it’s hatred.
Weird that he let the term spineless slip but go full bias on the word wacko.
Wacko is the nicest name I’ve ever heard trudeau be called
I can't believe what has happened here in the US and what is happening in Canada
These policies are destroying families and needs to be highlighted with utmost severity. Thank you for that ❤
Perhaps Trudeau should be charged with crimes against humanity as he is refusing to end the 3 year experiment...which in itself a crime.
Wako is a nice word… I would’ve used worse!
We Canadians have a problem with our entitlement. Because there are obviously unresolved issues with eugenics based ideologies, when a prime minister in waiting, is blissfully unaware of how dehumanizing his comments and perspectives are….perpetually at the run off of a number of preventable problems, rather than the root. Why not put this much energy into holding big pharma accountable for drug crises?
Global left out the part where Trudeau calls Pollievre "spineless", and the speaker responds by kicking out the Lethbridge MP
So it's ok for Trudeau to characterize Pollivre as an extremist but not the other way around. Hmmm
What's were the animaniacs names again 😅? Yakko WAKKO and Dot? 😅.
Why is speaker not allowing compliments?
Bravo to truthful PP! He calls it as it is!
💯00 % The Goat 🐐 ❤️
Yes, limiting comments in the house should be minimalized by leaders... but damn that was good! 😆👏
Wacko is the best word
Wacko… white surpremacist … which is worse?
If the shoe fits!
Speaker should say....the right wing dishonourable prime minister.....never answers any questions ..defflect defflect.....throw him out
Hold up..
You did not show the party leave with Pierre.
I want to know who were throwing the F bombs at 1:39 ish mark.
Good Catch....i missed that....I did catch alot of it today, especially the parts the media isn't showing in this clip that i outlined in the reply to the first comment you should take a look at.......but I'm sure it was probably just another Liberal Back Bencher....wonder if it was my riding.....hopefully I get a chance to vote her out. It was definitely a female voice saying it.
Trudeau is far worse than a wacko.
They’re all far too over entitled, and unaccountable for their very serious errors. Because there are obviously unresolved issues with eugenics based ideologies, when a prime minister in waiting, is blissfully unaware of how dehumanizing his comments and perspectives are….perpetually at the run off of a number of preventable problems, rather than the root. Why not put this much energy into holding big pharma accountable for drug crises?
A 2 minute penalty for tripping for Pierre, I love this man! Let the hockey game begin.
Did buddy have this written out before hand and just read from it? dafq?
This speaker is clearly bias.
I see a new Trudeau flag being designed right now. " Wacko Trudeau " Has a nice ring to it.
I’m wondering how your comments meet community guidelines…ableism is hatred. Because there are obviously unresolved issues with eugenics based ideologies, when a prime minister in waiting, is blissfully unaware of how dehumanizing his comments and perspectives are….perpetually at the run off of a number of preventable problems, rather than the root. Why not put this much energy into holding big pharma accountable for drug crises?
If the speaker is going to remove Poilievre, he could at least hold Trudeau to the same standard and call him out as well for using "unparliamentary language".
he’s not a wacko he’s a seiko
Pierre Poilievre speaks for the people of Canada. Wacko is the most polite word what majority of Canadians call Trudeau.
And yeah, almost forgot, FJT.
Canada has a very serious discrimination and entitlement problem. Because there are obviously unresolved issues with eugenics based ideologies, when a prime minister in waiting, is blissfully unaware of how dehumanizing his comments and perspectives are….perpetually at the run off of a number of preventable problems, rather than the root. Why not put this much energy into holding big pharma accountable for drug crises?
replace wacko with "wacko feminist"
Insert Trudeau's house comments about Trucker Labels being Nazis, and Extremists, against his own lawfully protesting citizens that he orders the arrest of them with his right hand Christina Freeland who was issuing orders diretly to CSIS of what her office wanted to be conducted, that they fail to report on unbiased news reporting. They failed to report today how much the speaker costed us at Global of course and just conveniently failed to show the Conservative Party all walking out of Parliament in support of Pierre, how much did that speaker cost us in that move today. Failed to show Trudeau labelling Pierre "Extremist" just the few statements before which is why he changed his statement to "Extremist" showing some significant bias on Parliamentary house terms......This speaker has no business being in his position as he can't remain un-biased and of course he was a Liberal Appointed Speaker.......yet again more corruption......more bias media.....more failure to tell the WHOLE STORY to the public.......just what they WANT you to see.....this is TRUDEAU'S Canuckistan and you'll LIKE HIM, or you'll be SUBJECTED to more CHINESE INTERVENTION....the CSIS agent that ratted on that is GUARANTEED out of his career by now thanks to Liberal Corruption too.....but Media is hush hush on that one too.....
You work for your ward news?
Why is it OK for JT to call Poilievre “spineless” in same exchange of words? Why can’t JT just answer the question he’s asked?
Yes they are all over entitled and that’s making them wreck less with these issues, ie name calling rather than holding big pharma accountable for drug crises.
@@BearbearbearbearbearbearRarrrrTrudeau is responsible...fully responsible for every overdose death for refusing to reverse the decriminalization of hard drugs as Eby has requested....it is a 3 year experiment....how many more will die in the next 2 years?
So now speaking the truth is not allowed. I got that right?
“Wacko” is a lot milder than what most Canadians would call the Turd.
Just saying what everybody thinks. WACKO WACKO TRUDEAU WACKO
I’m wondering if you wrote the n word like that, if your comments would be removed. Because there are obviously unresolved issues with eugenics based ideologies, when a prime minister in waiting, is blissfully unaware of how dehumanizing his comments and perspectives are….perpetually at the run off of a number of preventable problems, rather than the root. Why not put this much energy into holding big pharma accountable for drug crises?
Getting sick of Greg fergus too
Unacceptable
Truth to power