Agree. How do does Simon think we make scientific progress? Hypotheses. They all lead to scientific discovery. An unproven hypothesis gives the opportunity to test further. If you read ANY scientific study, 98 percent will tell you further research is needed. That's the beauty of research. That how we know where to go from there.
I highly disagree with your assertion that Bell’s idea on the multi nippled goat was stupid. It wasn’t a bad idea. It was science, especially back then when you didn’t have computers and the ability to see what would happen with genetics in a programable framework. Practical tests were the only way to figure something by out. hHe had a hypothesis, he tested it, The hypothesis turned out to be incorrect. That is literally the basis of science.
Agreed, it was a perfectly valid idea, he had evidence for it and reasons to think it would be advantageous to do it. It just turned out to not work out that way.
Not all experiments are an overnight success. Bell's scientific approach to the teat problem did have limited success. Bell was indeed a genius and probably his sheep with 4 - 6 working teats was used for something else, not a failure.
This is the first video with Simon that I regret watching. Any experiment or idea can be good or bad, but you won't learn unless you try. Doing nothing is failure.
Yeah, stupid video. For a terrible idea you expect stuff like using asbestos. Stuff that actuat causes damage or hurts people. That is terrible ideas. Stufff that simply doesnt work out? Par for the course, nothing terrible.
@johnlewan1114 Eventhough you are absolutely right from "Any experiment..." up untill the end of what you're saying, I don't regret watching the video. It was interesting.
Agree. How does Simon think we make scientific progress? Hypotheses. They all lead to scientific discovery. An unproven hypothesis gives the opportunity to test further. If you read ANY scientific study, 98 percent will tell you further research is needed. That's the beauty of research. That how we know where to go from there..
So we have: 1: an underused function in an app 2: a science experiment that didn’t pan out…as most experiments do 3: an interesting idea that even the one who made it admitted they weren’t sure how to do it 4: a guy’s hobby 5: a philosophy idea (how the heck does this even remotely qualify!?) 6: a bigger ballista And these are MASSIVE failures to you?
@ and I still think that half of these shouldn’t even be here. One is just a science experiment, one is someone’s hobby that even Simon said was popular at the time, and the other is DaVinci, a man with like a thousand projects like the one here that were also impractical.
To the writer Dave Page: Look up what "terrible" actually means. You don't seem to be using an agreed-upon definition. To Simon Whistler: You don't have to read out loud everything you are handed. Some material is simply not good enough to be turned into a video. I recommend you throw this one away.
Dave needs to be fired honestly. Simon is just Ron Burgundy and will read anything put in front of him, no hate that's the job. But Dave has constantly bad takes, and inserts his politics at every chance he gets
We nowadays have AI interpretating brainwaves and creating visual images from them. So, once again, Tesla was right. Look it up. Simon is really lacking in his research it seems.
Genius often involves throwing a lot of stuff at the wall to see if it sticks- and even if you find that bright shining flash of brilliance - there's usually a huge mess of stuff that dropped to the floor with a thud to clean up.
Agree. How does Simon think we make scientific progress? Hypotheses. They all lead to scientific discovery. An unproven hypothesis gives the opportunity to test further. If you read ANY scientific study, 98 percent will tell you further research is needed. That's the beauty of research. That how we know where to go from there..
Jobs was very good at turning great products into really great products. Basically adding a bit of polish to really push something to the top of pile. That's hard to do. Of course he was dick and don't take his medical advice (although he did eventually realise he was wrong), dunno about genius but I'd put him ahead of someone like Elon Musk.
@@j.f.christ8421 Except he wasn't. He was kind of like the person in the group who has no idea how things actually work and what is/isn't possible but keeps demanding that the other people add a feature or change a design. Eventually the people actually doing all the engineering manage to get that feature in at the cost of something else. Most people don't understand how things come to be and just think it's something that one person "invents" and suddenly it's a thing. It's years or decades of tiny, incremental progress by hundreds or thousands of people working on tiny parts.
I don’t think I’ve ever been disappointed by a video made by Whistler Boi before, but this one was…not good. People were experimenting and trying things that didn’t work out. These weren’t terrible ideas. I think they were GREAT ideas. They just didn’t happen to be PRODUCTIVE ideas. The only thing I can think is: Is Simon trying to go meta here? He’s someone who has lots of great videos, but every once in a while, I guess you’re going to have a failure, and this one is his??? 🤷🏻♀️
Writer is to blame here. I stopped watching when he got to Leibniz because I almost died from second hand embarrassment. Given that the academic study of esotericism is still young and to this very day even a lot of academics think (quite incorrectly) of Newton’s obsession with alchemy as some kind of embarrassing folly, I am willing to forgive the very contested claim of alchemy being nothing more than ‘pseudoscience’. But when he came to Leibniz and presented this oversimplified caricature of his optimism, I suddenly heard the roar of a thousand souls of philosophy undergrad students screaming out in agony all at once and I decided that I have seen and heard enough.
@@magurgle - urgh. That’s not good. I’m not sure I know his work. I thought I had most of the Basement Dwellers’ names memorized, but he must be new to the captives’ list. I know Fact Boi is busy running half the channels on YT but I hope he sees these comments. I’d hate to see his channels go down in viewership bc he’s got less than awesome scripts that he’s working with.
Leibniz didn't just co-invent calculus, he publicized it, taught it to others and started clubs dedicated to learning it. Newton kept his version hidden and did nothing to spread understanding of it.
Maybe I'm forgetting my 'math origins/history'. I know a golden-age Muslim invented Algebra, but I thought another invented calculus? Geometry (and by extension Trigonometry) were well developed in ancient Greece (400-300BC), some of it prob further back to Ancient Egypt/Mesopotamia (3500BC). I thought Leibniz and co just expanded on the ancient ideas for calculus (and found practical use of the math theories)?
You say we are no closer to being able to look at images in peoples brains but last year Meta used AI to read peoples thoughts and translate brainwaves into reaonably accurate images. I know this sounds like BS but I did fact check myself and it is indeed true, which blows my mind.
China has a LOT of very big crossbows (more ballistae by that point) and several of them can be found in a lot of museums. Their designs are out in the public domain as well so if someone wants to build one they can very well do just that. I and a bunch of classmates back during my university days made one as a physics project under the pretence of demonstrating the tensile strength of various materials which we were using as the giant crossbow’s arms. We had started with launching watermelons but eventually the sheer strength was so powerful it was exploding the watermelons as they were being launched, so we moved to launching sandbags instead. We did run a few tests with a bowling ball to our great enjoyment, though when we accidentally clipped the side of a shed with the last launch and ended up ripping an entire wall of the thing off, we decided to stop doing that before we exploded a cow or something.
8:01 Thing is, alchemy isn’t a fantasy anymore. Mercury was changed into gold in a science experiment. While technically successful, the cost for doing this was prohibitive.
In high school chemistry we learned that you could turn other elements into gold with a powerful enough nuclear reactor. Simply bombard chosen element with enough protons and neutrons and somehow keep it from exploding. *keeping it from exploding or being radioactive post production being the almost impossible part.
@@ZER0--I believe this is just done in a particle accelerator. Smashing two atoms of different elements so they fuse into a new element. In any case, the gold is produced one atom at a time. It would take several million years of doing this to have a handful of gold.
Dumb video!! Glad to see lot's of comments saying what I was going to say!🤔 These are not all terrible or even bad ideas just because they weren't successful. Developing new technology only happens by trying out things never done before. This video was a good idea but the result is a really stupid video. 🤨
"The optimist proclaims that we live in the best of all possible worlds; and the pessimist fears this is true. So I elect for neither label." - James Branch Cabell
lost me at the random JK Rowling dig. This is not a video of terrible ideas but mainly ideas that just didn't pan out. I was expecting "Einstein believed you could force feed a hamster to encourage nuclear war."
On the thought camera, we're actually making progress and can get an admittedly very low quality image of someone's thoughts/dreams using neural networks to analyze and translate brain patterns into grainy images.
The philosphers stone in the first Harry Potter film was able to produce the elixer for eternal life, the reason Voldermort wanted it. I do not recall any other usage explained for it. Cheap shot on JK Rowling, and I believe even worse research on the Stone.
A good set of kids/young adult books...but they don't hold up to adult criticism/critique well. Even from a 'fictional critique': Ripley Scroll is centuries old...snake-face couldn't figure out way to steal the recipe and make his own stone? But he can read ppl's minds? 1star review.
I just finished reading this book to my daughter. It did say it could create gold and the elixir of life. Voldemort wanted it for the latter reason, but the former was mentioned as well.
And the more pointless saving daylight becomes the further north a person works and lives. It goes into effect during the brightest times of the year for the northern latitudes. Case in point, Alaska. Six months of day....gee we better wake up with the sun? wtf.
These were not terrible ideas. They were incorrect, they were to some degree ignorant, but they weren't stupid or ridiculous given the common knowledge of their times. What I consider a 'terrible idea' are things like Elon Musk thinking you could terraform Mars by using nuclear bombs to evaporate the ice caps, Elon Musk saying he could reduce the data transmission time to Mars using a string of satellites between the Earth and Mars,.... just totally stupid ideas like those.
@@colt5189 She's not. If she was, she would have spent at least as much time complaining about Steven van de Velde as Imane Khelif, to pick one example.
That Rowling shot was cheap. It's like saying using Excalibur in your story makes you a hack. The writer really has to stop trying to use these videos as his own soapbox.
He didn't wash for one. He thought that if he ate the right foods that personal hygiene wasn't required. Apparently he stank so badly that he'd be told to have a shower before big meetings or people wouldn't attend. Definitely not genius
@@thehomeschoolinglibrarian People with empathy and morals don't tend to become rich. It usually requires a willingness (or _eagerness)_ to screw other people over.
I'm surprised you didn't actually mention Voltaire's _Candide_ as a satire and a response to Leibnitzian optimism. Like, literally the plot was basically mocking the crap out of Leibnitz's position by subjecting the character in the story that holds Leibnitz's position with the most hilarious of misfortunes.
The writer actually dodged a bullet there because Candide is in no way a good criticism of Leibniz' optimism. Still, Voltaire made a much better straw man of Leibniz than the writer did here; this video was really embarrassing to watch.
Nah, Leibniz's theory can be tolerated, because it inspired Voltaire to write Candide. And Candide is possibly one of the best stories ever written. I'll take ridiculous philosophical theory if it means we also get excellent literature skewering that theory.
Man, Simon, I love your videos, but this isn't it chief. You need to make sure your writers aren't having you read slop like this as it tarnished your reputation.
Simon making this video should have been on the list. I'm at a loss as to what Leibniz's terrible idea was supposed to have been. Perhaps just saying "religion is a bad idea" would have sufficed, rather than rattling on about it at length. As for Jobs and Bell, these weren't so much bad ideas, as simple failed experiments. Not everything in marketing and science raises humanity to a new plain, but it's not a terrible idea to at least try them. And you knock Newton for his alchemy, and Tesla for his mind images, because they couldn't make these things work. Although, had they been artsmen writing science fiction novels, these might have been considered brilliant. I'd have reacted better, for example, to a story about someone suggesting that we take horse medication or inject bleach to cure covid. These things really were terrible ideas, although they definitely didn't involve a genius, just someone who thinks he is.
Not only do I agree with many other comments on Graham Bell's experiment not being a bad idea, but I also must say that iTunes ping wasn't necessarily a stupid idea. To be clear, I hate Steve Jobs, I despise Apple and Apple related products (for philosophical reason, the tech itself is... fine) and I never got convinced at all by iTunes. But calling a first draft at a social network a bad stupid idea is really stretching it. It didn't work, they didn't fully hack the code, but what would follow years later proves that the concept wasn't all bad
Steve didn't create jack shit. He told people what to make and left it to them to figure out how to make it work and funded it. Anybody with enough money can spew ideas.
You write the script based on the general knowledge of the public. Harry potter is quite common now since most people grew up with it. Not sure how that's a bias?
@@BluePlanetMediaher motives are also public. But take it from the creator's point of view. He is damned for saying something or nothing. If that is a bais, then you proved the point.
@@ZexMaxwellThe general knowledge of the public can be wildly incorrect and at times disturbingly ignorant. It literally takes two minutes and basically reading comprehension to discover JKR is not against LGBTQ+ people and never was!
@@piperjaycie JK Rowling has been extremely public that she supports gays and lesbians but NOT transgender rights, which she sees as being fundamentally incompatible with woman’s rights. She has repeated misinformation put out by groups funded by conservative organizations who are anti-LGBT because it aligned with her personal anti-trans bias, which has complicated her relationship with the community.
Alchemy was considered a legit science back then, Philosopher's stone was like Higgs boson of chemistry. Something that was perceived 100% true but hard to actually prove in life
Listen... Every genius knows that if the world thinks you are an idiot, you will fade into obscurity and they will leave you alone. Tactical stupidity 🤣
Edison proposed a way around the 'transmission problem': modestly sized generating stations in every neighborhood. If your longest cable-run is under a mile, losses aren't too bad. Then again, having 100's of coal-burning 'mini-powerhouses' all across town would dirty up the air in no time.
Though now, it turns out long-distance HVDC is superior in a lot of ways. Though Edison didn't have the tech back then. Edison was right about AC being a lot more dangerous though, hundreds of thousands have been killed by AC when a DC setup wouldn't have shocked them in the first place (touching 1 wire vs two, etc.) Wikipedia excerpt: "A high-voltage direct current (HVDC) electric power transmission system uses direct current (DC) for electric power transmission, in contrast with the more common alternating current (AC) transmission systems.[1] Most HVDC links use voltages between 100 kV and 800 kV. HVDC lines are commonly used for long-distance power transmission, since they require fewer conductors and incur less power loss than equivalent AC lines. HVDC also allows power transmission between AC transmission systems that are not synchronized. Since the power flow through an HVDC link can be controlled independently of the phase angle between source and load, it can stabilize a network against disturbances due to rapid changes in power. HVDC also allows the transfer of power between grid systems running at different frequencies, such as 50 and 60 Hz. This improves the stability and economy of each grid, by allowing the exchange of power between previously incompatible networks. The modern form of HVDC transmission uses technology developed extensively in the 1930s in Sweden (ASEA) and in Germany. Early commercial installations included one in the Soviet Union in 1951 between Moscow and Kashira, and a 100 kV, 20 MW system between Gotland and mainland Sweden in 1954.[2] Before the Chinese project of 2019, the longest HVDC link in the world was the Rio Madeira link in Brazil, which consists of two bipoles of ±600 kV, 3150 MW each, connecting Porto Velho in the state of Rondônia to the São Paulo area with a length of more than 2,500 km (1,600 mi).[3]..."
Forget human heaven. When I die I want to go to cat heaven, which is to cats as the big rock candy mountain is to humans. richard -- “No silicon heaven?! Of course there is a silicon heaven! If there weren’t, where would the calculators go when they die?” - Kryten, in “Red Dwarf”
As long as scientific hypotheses are tested ethically, it's not an automatic failure. I disagree with some of your assumptions. How do you think we make scientific progress? Hypotheses. They all lead to scientific discovery. An unproven hypothesis gives the opportunity to test further. If you read ANY scientific study, 98 percent will tell you further research is needed. That's the beauty of research. That how we know where to go from there. Take the advice other scientists are giving you on this video.
I disagree about the mouse. In an era that every mouse looks and feels like a miniature cybertruck, I found the round transparent apple mouse a welcome change. And yes, I used it and it's very ergonomical.
For a follow up video, you should talk about Linus Pauling, winner of 2 Nobel prizes. At the end of his life, he was advocating for a controversial megavitamin therapy…
0:50 - Chapter 1 - Steve jobs & itunes ping 3:20 - Chapter 2 - Alexander graham bell & the 6 nippled sheep 5:15 - Chapter 3 - Tesla & the thought camera 7:20 - Chapter 4 - Isaac newton & the philosopher stone 8:55 - Chapter 5 - Gottfired leibniz ; we live in the best of all possible worlds 11:50 - Chapter 6 - Leonard da vinci & the mega crossbow
Tesla had the most amazing ideas - if he could have executed even half of them...can you imagine?! I really don't understand the criticism about this brain snapshot idea though. During his lifetime computers (let alone those new ones that fit in your pocket), space travel, video conferencing, and a whole slew of other modern tech would have been written off as absolutely preposterous and basically insane. So? Who is so smart here? No one knows what is coming next. If people who have kooky ideas are consistently ridiculed enough, those groundbreaking developments are less likely to happen. So lighten up! Is it unlikely his idea would ever pan out? Sure! SO WHAT?!
the ballista existed over a millennium prior to the existence of the cannon. why da Vinci thought his seige weapon was anything new, I cannot say. it certainly already existed and had existed for perhaps two millenia
This video is just a commentary on how you have issues with the Scientific Method. The way science works is that you have an idea, you test it, you refine your idea, you test it again, and you keep going until you have a proveable theory. By its nature, for every good idea, there must be hundreds or thousands of bad or incomplete ones. This video makes it seem like that's a bad thing and not just learning and discovering. No one hits it out of the park the first time they pick up the bat.
The philosophical idea suggests that the world is as perfect as it can be, considering the imperfections of human beings, who are virtually responsible for all the suffering you mentioned.
The whole 'turn metal in gold' thing, I think neutrons can turn lead into gold in a fusion reactor, could be about that though wrong, however, even if you develop the philosophers stone or use neutrons, why would want you? It's only valuable becuase it's rare, and when we start mining asteroids, we'll need to remember that rare Earth metals are just that, rare 'Earth' metals.
Rear Earth metals are not even rare an earth. They are called that because they all act identical to each other chemically, and can not be separated from each other or purified using chemical processes. It takes other more expensive physical means such as the use of mass spectrometers to separate them.
Leonardo's giant crossbow sounds like a dangerous weapon for those using it thinking of the enormous pent up energy it would have to store and if it started creaking and splintering all men operating it would have to prepare to meet their maker. A failure would be like the splintering of a tree struck by lightning.
Tesla had a lot of good ideas but he had a lot of crazy ones too, such as a lightning gun and earthquake machine. The second one they built from his blueprints on Mythbusters and tried it out, it didn't work.
Tesla was a moron; he claimed that the Moon does not rotate. Meanwhile, his good ideas were not original and his original ideas were not good. He desperately tried to maintain his 'genius' image by telling lies about antigravity, perpetual motion and death-rays.
@captainspaulding5963 Sort of but not quite, what Tesla was suggesting was a weapon that could shoot actual lightning bolts that could shoot down airplanes sink ships and even level cities, real mad scientist stuff. I read about it in a book about him I borrowed from the library once.
@@captainspaulding5963 When electricity began to be supplied to ordinary homes, fire-fighters began to worry that the current would travel down their water streams and electrocute them. Edison suggested that the situation could be reversed and that streams of water could be used to electrocute enemies. Water doesn't work very well, but people have tried to use beams of ultra-violet light to ionise a 'tube' of air and pass a current down the resultant conductive path.
@@G74 One day, a physicist will write a proper book about Tesla, and destroy that crackpot's reputation for good. So far, all of the books about Tesla have been written by journalists, non-scientists and downright cranks.
You know, it's really ironic for the writer to be accused of doing something what basically all writers need to do. Show me one book where all concepts, tropes and ideas are original. Also, there would be no chemistry without alchemy, so it was not a complete waste of time.
Yeah, it's so tragic that the police can't take a snapshot of your entire mind if they suspect you of a crime... WTF Simon how could that possibly be a good thing?! I mean sure, he doesn't live in the US and has likely never dealt with US cops, but still... Come on, man. Mind-reading cops. Wtf.
You'd need very strict rules governing this technology for it not to be a nightmare - like, say, it's only admissible in court if the person volunteered to have their mind scanned and there's objective proof that this was not coerced.
it's a real shame they didn't follow through with that philosophers stone idea, and drop actual physics on it.. so you use it, it sends an area down to 0 Kelvin
Ping could've actually been a good one. A service made for fans, but it just didn't catch on. Now we have TikTok, insta and tube for that sort of thing tbh. Davincis big ass ballista was crazy, but less so than his helicopter. Ballistas at least were a thing, and massive fortification busting weaponry and kit was a thing, especially in antiquity.
We need to be very careful with words like "genius" which nowadays appears to mean "someone with slightly higher IQ than ordinary people and therefore doesn't try to eat his shoelaces every morning." In reality there are very few geniuses in the world but there are plenty of people who are eager to take credit for the hard work of their subordinates. Jobs, Musk, and far too many other self-aggrandizing narcissists fall into this category and they are most evidently nowhere near the genius level. We ought to try to use words correctly instead of devaluing them by over-use.
What is arguably A.G. Bell’s least-well-known invention (or at least co-invention), some might suggest was almost as valuable as the telephone: The aileron!
Newton lived in the twilight of alchemy and rise of pure science. All things being equal, had he lived say 50 or 100 years later, his interest in alchemy might not have taken as much of his time as it did in the life that he had.
I wouldn't call Deviance's giant crossbow a terrible idea, just an idea that was past it's time. Even so, such a weapon could have been very useful in taking ships if used to harpoon and real in your prey.
Wait... so Davinci "invented" the Ballista? A siege weapon that had existed since 400BCE (That we know of) what's that saying about tech bros inventing the buss every Decade?
There are passages in the Bible used to support people who have lost pets by reassuring them that the animal is in heaven, so your assertion that "nowhere in the Bible" is unfounded depending on how the Greek and Hebrew were translated.
Yeah, I always laugh my butt off when the same people that use the Bible as some kind of authoritative source, are utterly ignorant about how much it has changed because it wasn't good enough for the same people to begin with.
Alchemy wasn’t “mystical”, it was more erroneous proto- science. No one knew that metals were elements not compounds, so transmutation through chemical means made perfect sense. (The transmutation of lead into gold was done, as an experiment, in a reactor.). Belief in God was evidently not a handicap for the physicist, who was also a Catholic priest, who conceived of the Big Bang theory.
5:07 I beg to differ! Just because something doesn't work doesn't mean it was a bad idea. The idea was to find out whether or not it WOULD work. After all, you had the idea to upload this video, and here are the majority of 500 commenters telling you it ain't workin'.
"I've never heard of it." You say that as if we should be surprised. As well traveled as you are compared to [astoundingly below average] me, I'm nonetheless constantly amazed at how many days of school you must have missed. Then again, I should probably blame the UK school system for skipping things like our school systems do. "If it didn't happen here, or because of us, we'll just ignore it."
Bill Gates = paper clip Bob, Windows 9 8SE, and the last that almost brought the entire world to a complete standstill, Microsoft Office ribbon bar. LOL
You’ll do the third episode five years from now. Do you remember when there was a United States before Elon Musk gotten involved with government and politics? Lol
There will be a fourth part, but you won’t be doing it. AI will be narrating that for the robots. Remember when Sam Altman pushed to hard for the development of AI.
Alchemy wasnt a mysical pseudoscience it was the foundation of chemstiy. Every alchemist who tried and failed helped us develop the sciance as we know it today.
Chapter 1: iTunes Ping 00:50 Chapter 2: The 6-nippled Sheep 03:15 Chapter 3: The Thought Camera 05:15 Chapter 4: The Philosopher's Stone 07:16 Chapter 5: We live in the best possible world 08:54 Chapter 6: The mega Crossbow 11:46
@@nymphrodellsalavinI mean, cant deny the man knows how to play his cards really well.. He built himself up to be one of the richest men and put his money to good use, creating companies and hiring talented people and putting them together and leading them, which in term has brought humanity forward quite a bit. Idk I definitely have respect for the dude.
An experiment that gives you new information isn't a failure.
Yes, this is very badly titled.
Nothing is ever a waste of time, the worst result is that you know not to do it again.
@@Wee_Langside Unit 731 was a great example.
Agree. How do does Simon think we make scientific progress? Hypotheses. They all lead to scientific discovery. An unproven hypothesis gives the opportunity to test further. If you read ANY scientific study, 98 percent will tell you further research is needed. That's the beauty of research. That how we know where to go from there.
@Pixdust77 claiming further research is needed keeps the research grants coming in
I highly disagree with your assertion that Bell’s idea on the multi nippled goat was stupid. It wasn’t a bad idea. It was science, especially back then when you didn’t have computers and the ability to see what would happen with genetics in a programable framework. Practical tests were the only way to figure something by out. hHe had a hypothesis, he tested it, The hypothesis turned out to be incorrect. That is literally the basis of science.
Completely agree. The fact that an idea doesn't pan out does not make it a terrible idea.
@@rodrigoma1350like this video... 😮
I concur, very much so.
Agreed, it was a perfectly valid idea, he had evidence for it and reasons to think it would be advantageous to do it. It just turned out to not work out that way.
Not all experiments are an overnight success. Bell's scientific approach to the teat problem did have limited success. Bell was indeed a genius and probably his sheep with 4 - 6 working teats was used for something else, not a failure.
This is the first video with Simon that I regret watching. Any experiment or idea can be good or bad, but you won't learn unless you try. Doing nothing is failure.
Yeah, stupid video. For a terrible idea you expect stuff like using asbestos. Stuff that actuat causes damage or hurts people. That is terrible ideas. Stufff that simply doesnt work out? Par for the course, nothing terrible.
In a Simon-read list you'll get a few dodgy entries but overall it'll be anything from okay to excellent. This was pretty much irredeemable.
@johnlewan1114 Eventhough you are absolutely right from "Any experiment..." up untill the end of what you're saying, I don't regret watching the video. It was interesting.
Agree. How does Simon think we make scientific progress? Hypotheses. They all lead to scientific discovery. An unproven hypothesis gives the opportunity to test further. If you read ANY scientific study, 98 percent will tell you further research is needed. That's the beauty of research. That how we know where to go from there..
@@dustylong agreed. Really enjoyed this video
So we have:
1: an underused function in an app
2: a science experiment that didn’t pan out…as most experiments do
3: an interesting idea that even the one who made it admitted they weren’t sure how to do it
4: a guy’s hobby
5: a philosophy idea (how the heck does this even remotely qualify!?)
6: a bigger ballista
And these are MASSIVE failures to you?
Libertarians have a success rate of at least 120%, so any slight stumble from someone more competent than them is a massive failure.
I think these are supposed to be viewed in comparison to the other works of said geniuses
@ and I still think that half of these shouldn’t even be here. One is just a science experiment, one is someone’s hobby that even Simon said was popular at the time, and the other is DaVinci, a man with like a thousand projects like the one here that were also impractical.
Yeah this video was an L
Simon is not as "Big Brained" as he purports.
To the writer Dave Page: Look up what "terrible" actually means. You don't seem to be using an agreed-upon definition. To Simon Whistler: You don't have to read out loud everything you are handed. Some material is simply not good enough to be turned into a video. I recommend you throw this one away.
I quite enjoyed the video.
Dave needs to be fired honestly.
Simon is just Ron Burgundy and will read anything put in front of him, no hate that's the job.
But Dave has constantly bad takes, and inserts his politics at every chance he gets
To be fair, while Tesla was inarguably brilliant, he was also sort of banana-pants crazy.
There's nothing crazy about banana-pants.
@Tregrense Well met. So very well met.
He just went increasingly unstable the older he got.
We nowadays have AI interpretating brainwaves and creating visual images from them. So, once again, Tesla was right. Look it up. Simon is really lacking in his research it seems.
@Schander I'm pretty versed in my Tesla history, but thanks.
Genius often involves throwing a lot of stuff at the wall to see if it sticks- and even if you find that bright shining flash of brilliance - there's usually a huge mess of stuff that dropped to the floor with a thud to clean up.
An fMRI gets pretty close to taking a snapshot of what a person is thinking… that must not have come up when researching this episode in Wikipedia.
@@TheElectronicDilettante Not to mention all the inventions Tesla made we still somehow don't have.
You don't have to be a genius to throw everything against the wall. Babies do that all the time.
Sometimes genius borders on the amoral and the mad. Things thrown at a wall often include people. Ethics committees exist for a reason.
Agree. How does Simon think we make scientific progress? Hypotheses. They all lead to scientific discovery. An unproven hypothesis gives the opportunity to test further. If you read ANY scientific study, 98 percent will tell you further research is needed. That's the beauty of research. That how we know where to go from there..
I thought Steve Jobs was a genius at " selling " you the product, while everyone else was inovating/working on it. 😮
Jobs was very good at turning great products into really great products. Basically adding a bit of polish to really push something to the top of pile. That's hard to do.
Of course he was dick and don't take his medical advice (although he did eventually realise he was wrong), dunno about genius but I'd put him ahead of someone like Elon Musk.
@@j.f.christ8421 Except he wasn't. He was kind of like the person in the group who has no idea how things actually work and what is/isn't possible but keeps demanding that the other people add a feature or change a design. Eventually the people actually doing all the engineering manage to get that feature in at the cost of something else. Most people don't understand how things come to be and just think it's something that one person "invents" and suddenly it's a thing. It's years or decades of tiny, incremental progress by hundreds or thousands of people working on tiny parts.
Apple/Jobs were great at taking someone else's idea or product and marketing it better. That's it!
@@rubiconnn I think that he had a good record at conceptualizing compelling products. He couldn't design or engineer them himself though.
@@j.f.christ8421 I'd rate a pot of yogurt ahead of Musk. At least that has some culture.😂
I don't feel any of these ideas were bad. They were wrong or not timely, but fundamentally good ideas worthy of exploration.
Or at least worthy of refutation. This isn't scientific.
Science is literally just coming up with good idea and then trying to disprove them.
@@nymphrodellsalavinYes, a process of trial and error. There will be many bad ideas for every genius idea.
Even the one where they wanted to take pictures of ones memory? I mean really.. Impossible.. Not even an opinion,that's a fact.
@@tomthompson2309not to mention the philosopher’s stone
I don’t think I’ve ever been disappointed by a video made by Whistler Boi before, but this one was…not good.
People were experimenting and trying things that didn’t work out. These weren’t terrible ideas. I think they were GREAT ideas. They just didn’t happen to be PRODUCTIVE ideas.
The only thing I can think is:
Is Simon trying to go meta here? He’s someone who has lots of great videos, but every once in a while, I guess you’re going to have a failure, and this one is his??? 🤷🏻♀️
Writer is to blame here. I stopped watching when he got to Leibniz because I almost died from second hand embarrassment. Given that the academic study of esotericism is still young and to this very day even a lot of academics think (quite incorrectly) of Newton’s obsession with alchemy as some kind of embarrassing folly, I am willing to forgive the very contested claim of alchemy being nothing more than ‘pseudoscience’. But when he came to Leibniz and presented this oversimplified caricature of his optimism, I suddenly heard the roar of a thousand souls of philosophy undergrad students screaming out in agony all at once and I decided that I have seen and heard enough.
It's the writer Dave Page. He is horrible
@@magurgle - urgh. That’s not good. I’m not sure I know his work. I thought I had most of the Basement Dwellers’ names memorized, but he must be new to the captives’ list.
I know Fact Boi is busy running half the channels on YT but I hope he sees these comments. I’d hate to see his channels go down in viewership bc he’s got less than awesome scripts that he’s working with.
Leibniz didn't just co-invent calculus, he publicized it, taught it to others and started clubs dedicated to learning it. Newton kept his version hidden and did nothing to spread understanding of it.
Maybe I'm forgetting my 'math origins/history'. I know a golden-age Muslim invented Algebra, but I thought another invented calculus?
Geometry (and by extension Trigonometry) were well developed in ancient Greece (400-300BC), some of it prob further back to Ancient Egypt/Mesopotamia (3500BC).
I thought Leibniz and co just expanded on the ancient ideas for calculus (and found practical use of the math theories)?
You say we are no closer to being able to look at images in peoples brains but last year Meta used AI to read peoples thoughts and translate brainwaves into reaonably accurate images.
I know this sounds like BS but I did fact check myself and it is indeed true, which blows my mind.
China has a LOT of very big crossbows (more ballistae by that point) and several of them can be found in a lot of museums. Their designs are out in the public domain as well so if someone wants to build one they can very well do just that. I and a bunch of classmates back during my university days made one as a physics project under the pretence of demonstrating the tensile strength of various materials which we were using as the giant crossbow’s arms. We had started with launching watermelons but eventually the sheer strength was so powerful it was exploding the watermelons as they were being launched, so we moved to launching sandbags instead. We did run a few tests with a bowling ball to our great enjoyment, though when we accidentally clipped the side of a shed with the last launch and ended up ripping an entire wall of the thing off, we decided to stop doing that before we exploded a cow or something.
8:01 Thing is, alchemy isn’t a fantasy anymore. Mercury was changed into gold in a science experiment. While technically successful, the cost for doing this was prohibitive.
Yeah, and without alchemy we would not have modern chemistry.
Have you got a link about mercury being turned into gold?
In high school chemistry we learned that you could turn other elements into gold with a powerful enough nuclear reactor. Simply bombard chosen element with enough protons and neutrons and somehow keep it from exploding.
*keeping it from exploding or being radioactive post production being the almost impossible part.
@@ZER0--I believe this is just done in a particle accelerator. Smashing two atoms of different elements so they fuse into a new element. In any case, the gold is produced one atom at a time. It would take several million years of doing this to have a handful of gold.
Dumb video!! Glad to see lot's of comments saying what I was going to say!🤔
These are not all terrible or even bad ideas just because they weren't successful. Developing new technology only happens by trying out things never done before. This video was a good idea but the result is a really stupid video. 🤨
What this video needs are definitions of terms. Terrible idea, failure. genius, for starters.
"The optimist proclaims that we live in the best of all possible worlds; and the pessimist fears this is true. So I elect for neither label." - James Branch Cabell
Steve Jobs worst idea was getting cancer and thinking a good diet would be better than chemo and radiotherapy to cure it.
lost me at the random JK Rowling dig. This is not a video of terrible ideas but mainly ideas that just didn't pan out. I was expecting "Einstein believed you could force feed a hamster to encourage nuclear war."
On the thought camera, we're actually making progress and can get an admittedly very low quality image of someone's thoughts/dreams using neural networks to analyze and translate brain patterns into grainy images.
I like the way you say "We." And I don't think what you've said is true. No dreams of anyone have ever been captured.
Exactly right and the images can be suprisingly good, very interestimg line of investigation.
That's a testament to Davinci's genius that a giant crossbow siege weapon is considered a terrible idea.
And a few centuries earlier, it could have been devastating. Except the ballista existed then and had similar capability.
Always have to have a back up for dragons
The philosphers stone in the first Harry Potter film was able to produce the elixer for eternal life, the reason Voldermort wanted it. I do not recall any other usage explained for it.
Cheap shot on JK Rowling, and I believe even worse research on the Stone.
Thank you for the post, it shows that I was not alone in my impression on the rhetoric.
A good set of kids/young adult books...but they don't hold up to adult criticism/critique well.
Even from a 'fictional critique': Ripley Scroll is centuries old...snake-face couldn't figure out way to steal the recipe and make his own stone? But he can read ppl's minds? 1star review.
I just finished reading this book to my daughter. It did say it could create gold and the elixir of life. Voldemort wanted it for the latter reason, but the former was mentioned as well.
Daylight Savings Time from Ben Franklin. Seriously, the worst idea as it messes with people's internal clocks and upsets people's sleep schedules.
And the more pointless saving daylight becomes the further north a person works and lives. It goes into effect during the brightest times of the year for the northern latitudes. Case in point, Alaska. Six months of day....gee we better wake up with the sun? wtf.
These were not terrible ideas. They were incorrect, they were to some degree ignorant, but they weren't stupid or ridiculous given the common knowledge of their times. What I consider a 'terrible idea' are things like Elon Musk thinking you could terraform Mars by using nuclear bombs to evaporate the ice caps, Elon Musk saying he could reduce the data transmission time to Mars using a string of satellites between the Earth and Mars,.... just totally stupid ideas like those.
Dave obviously don´t like JK Rowling .
And she not trying to deprive trans people of anything. She just pointed out that they are not what they think they are.
Typical lefty i guess
Being a creative writer is a far cry from being a boon to society…..
JK Rowling is trying to protect women, which is a group that Dave must not support.
@@colt5189 She's not. If she was, she would have spent at least as much time complaining about Steven van de Velde as Imane Khelif, to pick one example.
these aren't terrible ideas, just failures. Failure is how we learn.
... a video about me?
No, you shouldn't have. Really, I don't want this evidence at my trial. You know what to do, ETA.
That Rowling shot was cheap. It's like saying using Excalibur in your story makes you a hack. The writer really has to stop trying to use these videos as his own soapbox.
Yeah, loads of writers draw from existing lore for all sorts of things. It’s how we keep things consistent and somewhat believable.
💯
Steve Jobs was good at business, he was by no means a genius.
Steve Jobs was probably suffered from Psycopathy and had no ability to feel empathy which probably why he was so go at business.
He didn't wash for one. He thought that if he ate the right foods that personal hygiene wasn't required. Apparently he stank so badly that he'd be told to have a shower before big meetings or people wouldn't attend. Definitely not genius
He was indeed good at business and a smart guy who hired even smarter people, but he definitely had some pretty big personal issues.
@@thehomeschoolinglibrarian People with empathy and morals don't tend to become rich. It usually requires a willingness (or _eagerness)_ to screw other people over.
He was a bullsh*ter, a good one at that.
Not the best Video today.....
This writer is consistently bad
I'm surprised you didn't actually mention Voltaire's _Candide_ as a satire and a response to Leibnitzian optimism. Like, literally the plot was basically mocking the crap out of Leibnitz's position by subjecting the character in the story that holds Leibnitz's position with the most hilarious of misfortunes.
The writer actually dodged a bullet there because Candide is in no way a good criticism of Leibniz' optimism. Still, Voltaire made a much better straw man of Leibniz than the writer did here; this video was really embarrassing to watch.
Nah, Leibniz's theory can be tolerated, because it inspired Voltaire to write Candide. And Candide is possibly one of the best stories ever written. I'll take ridiculous philosophical theory if it means we also get excellent literature skewering that theory.
Steve Jobs was a bully.
Normal people: the telephone is great
Alexander G Bell: THERE'S SO MANY NIPPLES. WHY!? WE MUST FIND A USE FOR THE EXTRA NIPPLES
Man, Simon, I love your videos, but this isn't it chief. You need to make sure your writers aren't having you read slop like this as it tarnished your reputation.
Simon making this video should have been on the list.
I'm at a loss as to what Leibniz's terrible idea was supposed to have been. Perhaps just saying "religion is a bad idea" would have sufficed, rather than rattling on about it at length. As for Jobs and Bell, these weren't so much bad ideas, as simple failed experiments. Not everything in marketing and science raises humanity to a new plain, but it's not a terrible idea to at least try them. And you knock Newton for his alchemy, and Tesla for his mind images, because they couldn't make these things work. Although, had they been artsmen writing science fiction novels, these might have been considered brilliant. I'd have reacted better, for example, to a story about someone suggesting that we take horse medication or inject bleach to cure covid. These things really were terrible ideas, although they definitely didn't involve a genius, just someone who thinks he is.
Not only do I agree with many other comments on Graham Bell's experiment not being a bad idea, but I also must say that iTunes ping wasn't necessarily a stupid idea.
To be clear, I hate Steve Jobs, I despise Apple and Apple related products (for philosophical reason, the tech itself is... fine) and I never got convinced at all by iTunes. But calling a first draft at a social network a bad stupid idea is really stretching it. It didn't work, they didn't fully hack the code, but what would follow years later proves that the concept wasn't all bad
Steve didn't create jack shit. He told people what to make and left it to them to figure out how to make it work and funded it. Anybody with enough money can spew ideas.
Genuine geniuses along side hard nosed business men who’s only skill is owning the company
JK Rowling did WHAT @ 7:35? Your bias is showing.
You write the script based on the general knowledge of the public. Harry potter is quite common now since most people grew up with it. Not sure how that's a bias?
@@ZexMaxwell saying she campaigned against the rights of anyone is absurd, that was the point of my post. Sorry if I was not clear.
@@BluePlanetMediaher motives are also public. But take it from the creator's point of view. He is damned for saying something or nothing. If that is a bais, then you proved the point.
@@ZexMaxwellThe general knowledge of the public can be wildly incorrect and at times disturbingly ignorant. It literally takes two minutes and basically reading comprehension to discover JKR is not against LGBTQ+ people and never was!
@@piperjaycie JK Rowling has been extremely public that she supports gays and lesbians but NOT transgender rights, which she sees as being fundamentally incompatible with woman’s rights. She has repeated misinformation put out by groups funded by conservative organizations who are anti-LGBT because it aligned with her personal anti-trans bias, which has complicated her relationship with the community.
Elon is not a genius, he's a rich kid who made good investments.
Who sucks at the teet of the US taxpayers.
Alchemy was considered a legit science back then, Philosopher's stone was like Higgs boson of chemistry. Something that was perceived 100% true but hard to actually prove in life
This guy needs to define genius. Half these folk were lucky, and got rich, and nothing more.
Listen...
Every genius knows that if the world thinks you are an idiot, you will fade into obscurity and they will leave you alone.
Tactical stupidity 🤣
The locksmith in me appreciates that edge view of that door.
Albert Einstein said that his "Cosmological Constant" theory was the biggest mistake of his career.
So.. Da Vinci forgot ballista existed, dating back to at least ancient Greece.
Thomas Edison pushing for DC for electricity transmission was a dud horse to back.
Edison proposed a way around the 'transmission problem': modestly sized generating stations in every neighborhood.
If your longest cable-run is under a mile, losses aren't too bad.
Then again, having 100's of coal-burning 'mini-powerhouses' all across town would dirty up the air in no time.
Though now, it turns out long-distance HVDC is superior in a lot of ways. Though Edison didn't have the tech back then. Edison was right about AC being a lot more dangerous though, hundreds of thousands have been killed by AC when a DC setup wouldn't have shocked them in the first place (touching 1 wire vs two, etc.) Wikipedia excerpt:
"A high-voltage direct current (HVDC) electric power transmission system uses direct current (DC) for electric power transmission, in contrast with the more common alternating current (AC) transmission systems.[1] Most HVDC links use voltages between 100 kV and 800 kV.
HVDC lines are commonly used for long-distance power transmission, since they require fewer conductors and incur less power loss than equivalent AC lines. HVDC also allows power transmission between AC transmission systems that are not synchronized. Since the power flow through an HVDC link can be controlled independently of the phase angle between source and load, it can stabilize a network against disturbances due to rapid changes in power. HVDC also allows the transfer of power between grid systems running at different frequencies, such as 50 and 60 Hz. This improves the stability and economy of each grid, by allowing the exchange of power between previously incompatible networks.
The modern form of HVDC transmission uses technology developed extensively in the 1930s in Sweden (ASEA) and in Germany. Early commercial installations included one in the Soviet Union in 1951 between Moscow and Kashira, and a 100 kV, 20 MW system between Gotland and mainland Sweden in 1954.[2] Before the Chinese project of 2019, the longest HVDC link in the world was the Rio Madeira link in Brazil, which consists of two bipoles of ±600 kV, 3150 MW each, connecting Porto Velho in the state of Rondônia to the São Paulo area with a length of more than 2,500 km (1,600 mi).[3]..."
Forget human heaven. When I die I want to go to cat heaven, which is to cats as the big rock candy mountain is to humans.
richard
--
“No silicon heaven?! Of course there is a silicon heaven! If there weren’t, where would the calculators go when they die?” - Kryten, in “Red Dwarf”
As long as scientific hypotheses are tested ethically, it's not an automatic failure. I disagree with some of your assumptions. How do you think we make scientific progress? Hypotheses. They all lead to scientific discovery. An unproven hypothesis gives the opportunity to test further. If you read ANY scientific study, 98 percent will tell you further research is needed. That's the beauty of research. That how we know where to go from there. Take the advice other scientists are giving you on this video.
I disagree about the mouse. In an era that every mouse looks and feels like a miniature cybertruck, I found the round transparent apple mouse a welcome change. And yes, I used it and it's very ergonomical.
You know this channel is Simon's playground when all this sassiness comes out
Thinking Newton invented calculus is a terrible idea.
Literally none off these are bad ideas.... they are philosophical exercises or they are just non expected results. Thats the scientific method....
For a follow up video, you should talk about Linus Pauling, winner of 2 Nobel prizes. At the end of his life, he was advocating for a controversial megavitamin therapy…
Some geniuses didn't steal their only known work from a patent application in the 30s...
0:50 - Chapter 1 - Steve jobs & itunes ping
3:20 - Chapter 2 - Alexander graham bell & the 6 nippled sheep
5:15 - Chapter 3 - Tesla & the thought camera
7:20 - Chapter 4 - Isaac newton & the philosopher stone
8:55 - Chapter 5 - Gottfired leibniz ; we live in the best of all possible worlds
11:50 - Chapter 6 - Leonard da vinci & the mega crossbow
Tesla had the most amazing ideas - if he could have executed even half of them...can you imagine?! I really don't understand the criticism about this brain snapshot idea though. During his lifetime computers (let alone those new ones that fit in your pocket), space travel, video conferencing, and a whole slew of other modern tech would have been written off as absolutely preposterous and basically insane. So? Who is so smart here? No one knows what is coming next. If people who have kooky ideas are consistently ridiculed enough, those groundbreaking developments are less likely to happen. So lighten up! Is it unlikely his idea would ever pan out? Sure! SO WHAT?!
I appreciate the throwing of shade at hate-mongers like JK Rowling and weirdy cross-waving sky fairies.
I loved it too. The jabs at 'em are so over-deserved.
This is the best of all possible worlds. Finally, a statement on which
both optimists and pessimists agree.
richard
--
a god created both sides.🙏😸.. like playing chess with yourself.🙏😸
solipsism from its point of view
Jobs simply swung the lash, nothing more.
the ballista existed over a millennium prior to the existence of the cannon. why da Vinci thought his seige weapon was anything new, I cannot say. it certainly already existed and had existed for perhaps two millenia
As a kid I had wanted to build a "super crossbow" using a truck's leaf spring as a bow.
This video is just a commentary on how you have issues with the Scientific Method. The way science works is that you have an idea, you test it, you refine your idea, you test it again, and you keep going until you have a proveable theory. By its nature, for every good idea, there must be hundreds or thousands of bad or incomplete ones.
This video makes it seem like that's a bad thing and not just learning and discovering. No one hits it out of the park the first time they pick up the bat.
The philosophical idea suggests that the world is as perfect as it can be, considering the imperfections of human beings, who are virtually responsible for all the suffering you mentioned.
Innovators and inventors are not always geniuses. Both can true but usually not.
What Davinci really invented was the Rule of Cool.
The whole 'turn metal in gold' thing, I think neutrons can turn lead into gold in a fusion reactor, could be about that though wrong, however, even if you develop the philosophers stone or use neutrons, why would want you?
It's only valuable becuase it's rare, and when we start mining asteroids, we'll need to remember that rare Earth metals are just that, rare 'Earth' metals.
Rear Earth metals are not even rare an earth. They are called that because they all act identical to each other chemically, and can not be separated from each other or purified using chemical processes. It takes other more expensive physical means such as the use of mass spectrometers to separate them.
Leonardo's giant crossbow sounds like a dangerous weapon for those using it thinking of the enormous pent up energy it would have to store and if it started creaking and splintering all men operating it would have to prepare to meet their maker. A failure would be like the splintering of a tree struck by lightning.
Tesla had a lot of good ideas but he had a lot of crazy ones too, such as a lightning gun and earthquake machine. The second one they built from his blueprints on Mythbusters and tried it out, it didn't work.
Tesla was a moron; he claimed that the Moon does not rotate. Meanwhile, his good ideas were not original and his original ideas were not good. He desperately tried to maintain his 'genius' image by telling lies about antigravity, perpetual motion and death-rays.
Lightning gun, you say...... sounds kinda like a taser gun to me..... and they seem to work perfectly well.
@captainspaulding5963 Sort of but not quite, what Tesla was suggesting was a weapon that could shoot actual lightning bolts that could shoot down airplanes sink ships and even level cities, real mad scientist stuff. I read about it in a book about him I borrowed from the library once.
@@captainspaulding5963 When electricity began to be supplied to ordinary homes, fire-fighters began to worry that the current would travel down their water streams and electrocute them. Edison suggested that the situation could be reversed and that streams of water could be used to electrocute enemies. Water doesn't work very well, but people have tried to use beams of ultra-violet light to ionise a 'tube' of air and pass a current down the resultant conductive path.
@@G74 One day, a physicist will write a proper book about Tesla, and destroy that crackpot's reputation for good. So far, all of the books about Tesla have been written by journalists, non-scientists and downright cranks.
You know, it's really ironic for the writer to be accused of doing something what basically all writers need to do. Show me one book where all concepts, tropes and ideas are original.
Also, there would be no chemistry without alchemy, so it was not a complete waste of time.
Yeah, it's so tragic that the police can't take a snapshot of your entire mind if they suspect you of a crime... WTF Simon how could that possibly be a good thing?! I mean sure, he doesn't live in the US and has likely never dealt with US cops, but still... Come on, man. Mind-reading cops. Wtf.
You'd need very strict rules governing this technology for it not to be a nightmare - like, say, it's only admissible in court if the person volunteered to have their mind scanned and there's objective proof that this was not coerced.
it's a real shame they didn't follow through with that philosophers stone idea, and drop actual physics on it.. so you use it, it sends an area down to 0 Kelvin
Ping could've actually been a good one. A service made for fans, but it just didn't catch on. Now we have TikTok, insta and tube for that sort of thing tbh.
Davincis big ass ballista was crazy, but less so than his helicopter. Ballistas at least were a thing, and massive fortification busting weaponry and kit was a thing, especially in antiquity.
"No one knows what's a good idea or a bad idea until you try it."
-- Marc Randolph
We need to be very careful with words like "genius" which nowadays appears to mean "someone with slightly higher IQ than ordinary people and therefore doesn't try to eat his shoelaces every morning." In reality there are very few geniuses in the world but there are plenty of people who are eager to take credit for the hard work of their subordinates. Jobs, Musk, and far too many other self-aggrandizing narcissists fall into this category and they are most evidently nowhere near the genius level. We ought to try to use words correctly instead of devaluing them by over-use.
What is arguably A.G. Bell’s least-well-known invention (or at least co-invention), some might suggest was almost as valuable as the telephone: The aileron!
Jobs worst indeed was he could treat his cancer through ' natural means' rather than medical. So bad was that idea it cost him his life 😮
Newton lived in the twilight of alchemy and rise of pure science. All things being equal, had he lived say 50 or 100 years later, his interest in alchemy might not have taken as much of his time as it did in the life that he had.
Yo when did Simon get Buff AF? Look at those guns he has drawn at the start of this video
He's certainly not skipping gym-day.
I wouldn't call Deviance's giant crossbow a terrible idea, just an idea that was past it's time. Even so, such a weapon could have been very useful in taking ships if used to harpoon and real in your prey.
Wait... so Davinci "invented" the Ballista? A siege weapon that had existed since 400BCE (That we know of)
what's that saying about tech bros inventing the buss every Decade?
Genius is no guarantee of wisdom.
Neither is anybody's favorite superstition.
There are passages in the Bible used to support people who have lost pets by reassuring them that the animal is in heaven, so your assertion that "nowhere in the Bible" is unfounded depending on how the Greek and Hebrew were translated.
Yeah, I always laugh my butt off when the same people that use the Bible as some kind of authoritative source, are utterly ignorant about how much it has changed because it wasn't good enough for the same people to begin with.
I'm glad I'm not the only one that thought this episode was horrible
About the Air Power thing, Steve Jobs was long dead when that was announced
Alchemy wasn’t “mystical”, it was more erroneous proto- science. No one knew that metals were elements not compounds, so transmutation through chemical means made perfect sense. (The transmutation of lead into gold was done, as an experiment, in a reactor.). Belief in God was evidently not a handicap for the physicist, who was also a Catholic priest, who conceived of the Big Bang theory.
"The father of the technology which would eventually become the device that you are most likely watching this video...."
Um, you mean the toilet?
5:07
I beg to differ! Just because something doesn't work doesn't mean it was a bad idea. The idea was to find out whether or not it WOULD work.
After all, you had the idea to upload this video, and here are the majority of 500 commenters telling you it ain't workin'.
This genius video cured my terrible Crohn's. 10/10
but then Bells experiment was good... he "confirmed" that the multi nipples sheep sucked.
"I've never heard of it."
You say that as if we should be surprised.
As well traveled as you are compared to [astoundingly below average] me,
I'm nonetheless constantly amazed at how many days of school you must have missed.
Then again, I should probably blame the UK school system for skipping things like our school systems do.
"If it didn't happen here, or because of us, we'll just ignore it."
Bill Gates = paper clip Bob, Windows 9 8SE, and the last that almost brought the entire world to a complete standstill, Microsoft Office ribbon bar. LOL
Melinda French failure = Bill Gates. : )
I know where the second and third part of this are going because they will both be dedicated to Elon Musk
You’ll do the third episode five years from now. Do you remember when there was a United States before Elon Musk gotten involved with government and politics? Lol
There will be a fourth part, but you won’t be doing it. AI will be narrating that for the robots. Remember when Sam Altman pushed to hard for the development of AI.
Simon is unaware of many advancements in devices similar to a "thought camera".
0:07 oh! I had no idea we were still pretending EM isn't a Buffoon
Alchemy wasnt a mysical pseudoscience it was the foundation of chemstiy. Every alchemist who tried and failed helped us develop the sciance as we know it today.
I think you may have made a mistake. JK Rowling is an advocate for woman and girls rights.
Chapter 1: iTunes Ping 00:50
Chapter 2: The 6-nippled Sheep 03:15
Chapter 3: The Thought Camera 05:15
Chapter 4: The Philosopher's Stone 07:16
Chapter 5: We live in the best possible world 08:54
Chapter 6: The mega Crossbow 11:46
I wouldn't necessarily say all these people are geniuses.
Elon Musk, and Hyperloop springs to mind.
That implies Musk is a genius, which he isn't
@@nymphrodellsalavinI mean, cant deny the man knows how to play his cards really well.. He built himself up to be one of the richest men and put his money to good use, creating companies and hiring talented people and putting them together and leading them, which in term has brought humanity forward quite a bit. Idk I definitely have respect for the dude.
@@eliteiel9747 Respect which is just _slightly_ destroyed by Musk behaving like the world's richest four year old
@@eliteiel9747 Yeah, he built himself up to "insanely rich" from the humble starting position of "already rich".