Black Sea Fleet Losses Prompt Russia To Build Aircraft Carrier Armed With Su-57? Ex-Admiral Says...

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 30 ก.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 484

  • @oldbutbold
    @oldbutbold 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    No, Russia does not need an aircraft carrier...it never did. It needs larger and more capital ships like destroyers to patrol the North Sea and other oceans it deems fit. 1 aircraft carrier can buy 2-3 destroyers or 5-7 frigates...the choice is clear to rebuild a navy.

    • @RoCK3rAD
      @RoCK3rAD 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Russia shouldn’t build a navy focus on air and ground. Slavic people by their nature are not sea going people they don’t have the ocean in their blood. Russia needs to focus on convincing the nearly 3 million Russian peoples to come back to the motherland and build their future their instead of the west. I believe Putin is working on that

  • @firefistace2985
    @firefistace2985 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    😂😂😂 another Russian PIPEDREAM😂😂😂

  • @andrewstone2806
    @andrewstone2806 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    I hear Putin already working on the supersized tugboat that’s going to tow it from port to port 😂

  • @milk_chemistry
    @milk_chemistry 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Lol wtf is with the rave music mid way through

  • @pingjuaneza2547
    @pingjuaneza2547 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    This plan tp build a super carrier.
    Just like the plan to take kiev in 3 days lol

    • @wouterkellerman4458
      @wouterkellerman4458 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Oi that was The Sun saying that. Putin said that it will take as long as it takes.
      Instead of showing your braineashed ignorance to the world, FIRST geg the FACTS ad THEN ONLY open your yapper 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

    • @whodaFru4551
      @whodaFru4551 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Putler is a mastermind according to russian shovels. Well, russian shovels are not the brightest, so that doesnt mean a lot 😅

  • @krystalmae5557
    @krystalmae5557 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +50

    A major problem for russia is the budget

    • @MausMasher54
      @MausMasher54 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      That and their resources are screwed, trains with raw materials are rolling off the tracks, highways will also become a Partisan Target Zone, if the Mines are not already experiencing issues, that by departing Ukraine could solve....

    • @northstar1060
      @northstar1060 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      dont be absurd,,,,,they sell 2 billion in oil DAILY

    • @pingjuaneza2547
      @pingjuaneza2547 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      ​@@northstar1060 To whom do they sell them your mother?

    • @steveb890
      @steveb890 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      @@northstar1060 HAHAHA whos being absurd ? 🤡.. They only make around $17Million/day !

    • @sphsmith3400
      @sphsmith3400 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      ​@pingjuaneza2547 You TH-cam generals seem to have a lot of top secret information about the Russians economy. Last I checked, Russia was the top four in the world economically.

  • @JoeZorzin
    @JoeZorzin 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    The best thing Russia could do for its citizens is give up trying to be a super power.

    • @grahamdrew5512
      @grahamdrew5512 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Exactly....Russia is a minor power with a major power's leftover weapons and no industry other than exporting raw materials.

  • @LutherusPXCs
    @LutherusPXCs 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    Russias GDP needs to be measured in PPP. The fact they still have money to run the war and industry under 16000 sanctions is starting to not make sense.

    • @NamelessOne-pi9sj
      @NamelessOne-pi9sj 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Then you really bought into western media

    • @Youjeez123
      @Youjeez123 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      They are hurting but by estimate they can this war for over 10 years russia's ppp is 5 trillion and currently russia only spent about 300$ usd in this war

    • @hanshuber1875
      @hanshuber1875 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      but your citizizen cant buy anything in the world with worthless rubel. and without a strong currency or foreign cash reserves, your economy cant buy what they need. So in fact, russia a poor country. Despite having the biggest landmass on earth and over 140mio people, Italy has a bigger GDP and this without selling massive amounts of recources and only having about 60 mio people. So offcourse can russia still fight a war, they got the biggest reserves on weapons the world has ever seen. But the USSR needed nearly half a decade to built them and russia is losing them so fast, by this rate, the are running out on "modern" T72/80 tanks in 2025/2026

    • @timonsolus
      @timonsolus 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@hanshuber1875 : Half a decade? I think you meant to say half a century.

    • @brownpleasure9320
      @brownpleasure9320 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@hanshuber1875 but their people are getting paid in rubels, meaning russia has very cheap labour

  • @jimbøb-i9q
    @jimbøb-i9q 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

    By all means.. Go ahead! .. It will make a beautiful reef..

  • @andrewstone2806
    @andrewstone2806 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Instead being supported by a striker carrier group it will be supported by a strike tow group of tugboats

  • @cndrih
    @cndrih 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Russia is so powerful that even US know and it dont want to directly messed with cause it will be US end.🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺💕💕URAAAASSS MOTHERLAND SO POWERFUL

    • @michaelsrensen3398
      @michaelsrensen3398 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      So powerfull that a nation with no navy has chessmate the russian black sea fleet.

  • @Look-at-yourself87
    @Look-at-yourself87 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Super carrier.. he doesn’t even have enough for ammo

  • @frankmcgowan3371
    @frankmcgowan3371 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +65

    Russia can’t equip their ground forces with proper equipment and currently have 14 SU-57 aircraft. The idea of building an aircraft carrier and the planes it needs are ludicrous. Dream on Putin.

    • @eddiejames9247
      @eddiejames9247 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      When a madman finally does lose it altogether you get ideas such as these

    • @steveb890
      @steveb890 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Pretty sure they only have ( had ) 6 `incomplete` aircraft ... now down to 5 after a cheap drone destroyed one ! 🤣

    • @drgonzo305
      @drgonzo305 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They lost 1 maybe 2 Su-57 to Ukrainian drones so more like 12 Su-57s

    • @normal_side
      @normal_side 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      You said it all, where is even the money for that now?

    • @shwetaraju1550
      @shwetaraju1550 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      No they have 22 su 57 10 prototypes

  • @roypfeiffer4442
    @roypfeiffer4442 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    AHHH.. Something New NEW to sink just as soon as. .WAIT!?...IT'S RUSSIAN?...This may be their newest Self Sinking design perhaps we should hold back some and.....

  • @evertonmcfarlane6383
    @evertonmcfarlane6383 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Almost 15 years now Russia came up with this ship building plan and all now it can't go into production.

  • @hkfoo3333
    @hkfoo3333 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +51

    Putr nonsense . You think building Carriers are like going to supermarkets to buy groceries?
    Stop making up stories

    • @lukeaquino7141
      @lukeaquino7141 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Dang, that gave pro russians a reality check lmao

    • @nsevv
      @nsevv 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      While it is being constructed it will be hit by ukraine drones...

    • @hkfoo3333
      @hkfoo3333 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@nsevv
      Another fella with pure nonsense.
      Ukrainian drones at most able to hit some near places .... to strike where carriers are built or any sensitive items? Even the entire US or Nato do not have that capabilities.

    • @sphsmith3400
      @sphsmith3400 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ​@@nsevvKeep dreaming.

    • @fredycorea4901
      @fredycorea4901 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@hkfoo3333
      You are right!
      Imposible to hit something that exists only Putin dreams 😂

  • @TheMilpitasguy
    @TheMilpitasguy 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    But.. but.. how? The Su-57 isn't even in production yet, and they're still waiting for those microchips from the West. LOL

  • @johnarthur6180
    @johnarthur6180 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    missiles and drones are the latest gadgets ships are now secondary and vulnerable

  • @Matthew-wn8oq
    @Matthew-wn8oq 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

    Now you know hes bananas 😂

    • @kam1470
      @kam1470 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You mean guy that says : we beat Medicare? Lol

    • @Matthew-wn8oq
      @Matthew-wn8oq 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@kam1470 mmmmmm what?

    • @aleserban9322
      @aleserban9322 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Just a question where you wil go after Ukraine lost war and west take western part of Ukraine and Russia with Russian people living in Ukraine has joined Russia..? Ukrainians are traitors of Slavs and scapegoat of west, I'm sorry for them but Neobandera nazi regime is near extintion

    • @kam1470
      @kam1470 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Matthew-wn8oq yeah google biden presiddntial debate:D

    • @whodaFru4551
      @whodaFru4551 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Putler dreaming about his ghost army. Already had that once in history..

  • @ruslan-pe3wx
    @ruslan-pe3wx 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Russia currently doesn't need any aircraft carrier. It needs to improve air force and land forces to defeat NATO armies in Ukraine.

    • @uckthis8079
      @uckthis8079 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Russia have the famous kuznecow which is so good that they don't need anything better. This is the greatest pride of the Russian army. The history of this ship, numerous repairs and recommissioning, should be known to every Russian

    • @cloudstrike4067
      @cloudstrike4067 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Lol what a joke, Russia do not have enough advance weapons and the so called advance weapons like S-400 and S-500 are just in paper and in reality is a Junk Weapons made by Russia..

    • @randym7961
      @randym7961 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Um what NATO Armies ?? I know it must seem embarrassing that Ukraine is not letting Russia win but man up and accept your failings !! Hey them Ukrainians are pretty Bad Arse

    • @fusonegro1462
      @fusonegro1462 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@uckthis8079 Putin's corrupt government from head to toe

    • @MasterMagz
      @MasterMagz 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      They already have an smoking aircraft carrier 😂

  • @rangiwirihana6902
    @rangiwirihana6902 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +23

    Putin won't live to see it 😂😂😂

    • @sphsmith3400
      @sphsmith3400 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      You're a comedian.

    • @kygocrysmaine3583
      @kygocrysmaine3583 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      At this rate, trump should consider this as an opportunity to befriend russia, make them pay in dollars to help rebuild their military in return. This will help US to stay ahead of China

    • @JosephStalin-y8x
      @JosephStalin-y8x 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@sphsmith3400 and?

    • @uckthis8079
      @uckthis8079 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thats true. Peapole dont live that long and puszkin is already almost done. There is 0% chances for him to see the russian made aircraft carrier 😂 maybr admiral kuznecow but that is just shame shame shame😂😂😂 kuzniecow is perfect example of corruption

    • @manuelhengel431
      @manuelhengel431 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      When in 100 years, will the eternal Putin thing come true!
      Every twenty years you can hear in the Kremlin: "Clone the next fucking face"!😂😂😂😂😂😂🤣🤣
      but please 90 percent fewer losers and 80 percent less megalomania!😉

  • @Concerned_Citizen665
    @Concerned_Citizen665 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Aircraft carriers are old tech it has vonrable against anti ship ballistic missiles and drone swarms. Also too expensive to run. You need Drone swarm carrier groups like China has. Its more effective.

    • @pistondo
      @pistondo 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      The only sensible comment

    • @whodaFru4551
      @whodaFru4551 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      💨

  • @whoofit
    @whoofit 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +36

    A better use of their money would be to get their navy personnel some advanced swimming lessons.

    • @LJC370
      @LJC370 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      You should spend some money on crayons and coloring books, good luck buddy!🤣👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻

    • @whoofit
      @whoofit 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      @@LJC370 I hit a sore spot, comrade? LMFAO!

    • @darwinsoriano6792
      @darwinsoriano6792 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Why swim....... if bodies can float, dead.

    • @cloudstrike4067
      @cloudstrike4067 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@LJC370 Russia do not have money for advance weapons, it's suck right?

    • @indrahaseo
      @indrahaseo 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      😂😂😂

  • @ronilotagyab1945
    @ronilotagyab1945 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +31

    Too late! Better make peace and get out of Ukraine!

    • @gabriels6795
      @gabriels6795 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      They aren't in Ukraine. All areas are populated by Russians/Ukrainian secessionists who voted to join the Russian federation. The UN charter of human rights states that every people has a right to self determination. Ever since Washington's coup in Ukraine the people of Donbass broke away, forming their own states. Go to Mariupol, go to Donbass, go to Crimea, you will find overwhelming support for Russia, Putin and the SMO/war. To support Ukraine in taking this land is to support an occupation and no doubt Ukraine will face tough resistance from the people, from the Russians, from the Natives.
      The facts are undeniable, you can even look at polling data in Ukraine, these regions have always historically voted for pro Russian options. No doubt all this info will make you feel emotional especially if you have been cheering for Russia's destruction, I bet you still think that there are no USA made Nazzzzz1 brigades and that Iraq still has WMD's and that the corona virus vaccine was safe and effective.... good luck to u. But again, Crimea, Zaporozhe, Lugansk, Kherson and Donetsk all do not want Kiev's 'Liberation'

    • @MjRadha
      @MjRadha 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      nato go home leave ukraine alone

    • @chopstixsix802
      @chopstixsix802 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      How about NATO go home! USA stop warmongering all over the world! Kind of hypocritical saying Russia wants to invade all of Europe yet it’s the USA with bases everywhere, reputation of invading numerous countries.

    • @OctavioTaveras-b6o
      @OctavioTaveras-b6o 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Absolutely right buddy!!!😅

    • @lazylizard6682
      @lazylizard6682 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

  • @gonzoalonzo
    @gonzoalonzo 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Didn't go well the last time they built a carrier. Nothings changed

  • @eddiewelch3160
    @eddiewelch3160 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hey Ukraine look!!! Fresh meat for grinder coming in a year or so. Juicy steak!!! Yummy! Loins!!!!!

  • @anglosaxon244
    @anglosaxon244 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    They should spend the money in FAB 500 - 800 - 1500 - 3000 ...Thats a good deal !!!
    5 billion just in that !!!,...and try to get close to Russia,after that!!!

  • @danyaradimacher6581
    @danyaradimacher6581 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

    This new carrier will be a gigantic sitting duck

    • @al68fc11
      @al68fc11 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Like the USS Eisenhower aircraft carrier, right? Yemen made the mighty US aircraft carrier shake it tail, and it was hit. So, think about that. YEMEN did it.

    • @al68fc11
      @al68fc11 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @AtheismScientism "PROPAGANDA" 🤔🤔🤔🤔, you mean facts and common sense for a better world . Only Western politicians and warmongers.

    • @Mishn0
      @Mishn0 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@al68fc11 The Eisenhower was not hit by the Houthis. It was hit by Photoshop. Some of the pictures claimed to show the damage to the Eisenhower weren't even pictures of the Eisenhower. Go touch some grass, the brain rot is getting to you.

    • @al68fc11
      @al68fc11 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @AtheismScientism My comment was deleted. FACTS and COMMON SENSE are forbidden here. I'm not against the West and never will. I'm against warmongers and corrupt politicians.

    • @al68fc11
      @al68fc11 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Keep deleting my comments 👏👏👏👏. I'm not gonna write things just to please this news outlet. NEVER!

  • @moussameman2221
    @moussameman2221 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The west is making Russia💪🏾🇷🇺 more and more stronger! Well done west 😂

  • @selvammaniamawasi697
    @selvammaniamawasi697 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Indian pariah news Crux pulling out news from their butt 😂

  • @rhodium1096
    @rhodium1096 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Black sea fleet losses are : Old Polish landing ships ( Ropucha), Old soviet Corvette( Tarantul), Patrol boat, fast boats and Moskova cruiser ( obsolete Soviet warship with no planned upgraded)...No modern frigates and Corvette armed with cruise missile have been sunk.

  • @caponekartel
    @caponekartel 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Maybe for beyond russian waters is compulsory...

  • @omegaz3393
    @omegaz3393 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This isn't going to happen.
    Half of ruZZian national wealth fund is depleted including 50% of its gold reserves.
    Of the half remaining, only about 50% of that is what's called liquid and that may be depleted by the end of 2024.
    Beyond that. It's doubtful they have the capability to build a working functioning Aircraft carrier.
    They've been suffering a Brain drain since 1990's and it has only accelerated. Especially since the Special Military Operation began.
    They're also suffering a major shortage of skilled labor. Like a shortage of 500k.
    They either left ruZZia or went to the meat grinder never to return☠.

  • @Alphamero101
    @Alphamero101 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    well they have money,they also have skilled labor for the job..they can achieve it.Technologically they are capable

  • @JoeyRay-fz1qe
    @JoeyRay-fz1qe 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Russia doesn't need a Super Carrier because of where there ports are. Black Sea, is blocked off. The Baltic Sea can be blocked off. The Arctic, freezes up and to try to get a huge ship like that out it would be a easy target. The only port is in the Pacific but it would be watched. Russia is a land country so it doesn't need huge ships, what they need is more Nuke Subs. Corvettes, Frigates and large Frigates will do with missiles like Hyper ones. It is better they spend there money on the Air Force making it larger and the Army!

    • @grahamdrew5512
      @grahamdrew5512 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Actually Russia should be spending money on infrastructure not war...The irrational fear of Russians of being invaded is made up BS. No one wants to take over Russia that was Putin's first lie and you all bought it. Wasting money on war is the epitome of wasted resources. No one wins but the Elites who rule you...

  • @mitchellculberson9336
    @mitchellculberson9336 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Just dreaming.Rhey don't have tje cash to fix the old one they have much lay down a keel for a supercarrier,much less 4 .

  • @junjiezerocool3307
    @junjiezerocool3307 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    Im starting to think Crux is pro Russia...

    • @Chriscers
      @Chriscers 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      so what??? Cuz Am tired to see the US bias CNN, FOX NEWS, New york TImes, that are pro Lies and against Russia, So USA is not the only media that exists

    • @vijaym2823
      @vijaym2823 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You are starting to see ,,, you mean you never taught that there might be Two side to a story or do you just drink CNN propaganda !!!!

    • @yourfather5093
      @yourfather5093 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      think again...

    • @kygocrysmaine3583
      @kygocrysmaine3583 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Crux was not even close to hindustan times. Compare them and you'll see

    • @bluebandites
      @bluebandites 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Kinda but it's nothing compared to times of India and Hindustan times

  • @bietlaichhaihlychho1618
    @bietlaichhaihlychho1618 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Russia is desperate now. Whatever Russia does is desperate's actions. I feel pity for Russia.

  • @delldell191
    @delldell191 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    We don't even know if the Soviet Union will exist in this predicted future. Predictions, less gloomy, indicate that we will soon have Little Russia in Russia, better known as the Soviet Union.

  • @braylinbateman4369
    @braylinbateman4369 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Operational in 45 days??? Must be smokin that good shit.

  • @ActiveDodger
    @ActiveDodger 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Why build ships? Just focus on submarines since Russian ships end up at the bottom of the sea. This will end up as a super submerged carrier 🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺

  • @AnangRobby-qt2nb
    @AnangRobby-qt2nb 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Perseden Putin Vladimir 👍✈️

  • @willgerona9523
    @willgerona9523 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Russia need to focus on it's own development. At the moment it is at the mercy of China. If Putin wasn't so Crazy, Russia could have been part of the EU and at least 3x it's current economy

  • @justme-ud2vk
    @justme-ud2vk 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    crap my pants laughing..... putin will get his gaddafi style.

  • @drgonzo305
    @drgonzo305 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Sure Putin, I’m sure the ship yards are getting right too it! If Russia is known for 1 thing, it’s the indomitable power of their existing aircraft carrier! 😂

  • @elchicano187
    @elchicano187 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Yeah, yeah yeah and the Chinese will build it for him too 😂😂

    • @topviewstudios
      @topviewstudios 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      The first Chinese aircraft carrier came from Soviet Union. Learn to talk with deep research and not propaganda

    • @whodaFru4551
      @whodaFru4551 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@topviewstudios And yet russia hasnt a single one thats operational. Thats funny 😄

    • @Findout66
      @Findout66 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@whodaFru4551 Russia is a landlocked country meaning it's greatest threaths will come from land, any attempt from sea can be foiled relatively easy with long range missles which is why they invest less in aircraft carriers, another reason is that unlike the US, Russia does not project it's forces all over the world so it has less of a need for aircraft carriers

    • @whodaFru4551
      @whodaFru4551 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Findout66 Apparently Putler thinks differently.

  • @madyak222
    @madyak222 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Aircraft carriers are probably the worst type of legacy vessel that could be built by Russia. if it was based on western designs. Russia is the leader in Hypersonic Missiles, with the Zircon & Kinzhal designed to sink Aircraft Carriers. Not to ment the Poseidon, Submarine Nuclear powered Torpedo Drone, which can also sink Aircraft carriers or any other type of large Naval Vessel. Russia is far better off focusing on leading edge technologies, including land, sea and air drones as well as Missiles along with HYpersonic planes and reusable space vehicles and nest generation Submarines. this "retired general who has proposed this aircraft Carrier idea is possibly just voicing an opinion of a Soviet trained individual with outdated cold war thinking.

  • @MasterMagz
    @MasterMagz 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Yeah I know you have vast experience in making smoking carriers 😂

  • @fusonegro1462
    @fusonegro1462 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What happen to his nuclear hypersonic stealth bomber strike, why is it suddenly not mentioned?

  • @caintindal1671
    @caintindal1671 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The very old broken down one Carrier that may not stay afloat and cost a fortune to run. against Americas 12 Carriers and Englands two Carriers yep will Russian power there.

  • @derekbatten9236
    @derekbatten9236 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The only country needs aircraft carriers is the US, as the US likes to assert dominance far away from home. Unfortunately, aircraft carries are becoming obsolete, Billions spent on them not including the aircraft, then one hypersonic missile and all is gone. I do not understand why Russia wants one.

  • @randym7961
    @randym7961 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Simple they do not have the facilities to build a Carrier of any size well other than that model Putin was playing with a number of years ago.. Putin has wanted a real carrier for a long time but they just can't build one as I said no yards can build anything bigger than a Cruiser and they don't have the tech needed to build one if they had the facilities.. Remember they had to have France build those 2 assault carriers that they never got , add to that their Ski Carrier isn't likely to ever leave port again. Then there is the Problem of the SU 57 very few being built and would likely need to be redesigned to be able to launch it with a catapult , well unless they went the Ski Jump method again but with it they can't launch planes with full loads of fuel and weapons . No Russia doesn't have a real Carrier in its future ...

  • @PeterAichberger-u9f
    @PeterAichberger-u9f 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    All materials needed will be supplied by China and North Korea

  • @Hassaan-hp3cy
    @Hassaan-hp3cy 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    The major problem for russia is that almost all of its seaports are blockaded by nato countries and that threatens their navy highly. In the north the water is too cold and mostly ice which makes naval ship passages almost impossible

    • @Concerned_Citizen665
      @Concerned_Citizen665 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Vladivostok port is free of ice. Also Kaliningrad port free of Ice.

    • @MausMasher54
      @MausMasher54 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@Concerned_Citizen665 I'm thinking tha Vladivostok is in Play for a Chinese or NK sale....

    • @Hassaan-hp3cy
      @Hassaan-hp3cy 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@Concerned_Citizen665 Yes but vladivostok port has the threat from japan as it is a huge US military and naval base in the region right at the exit of vladivostok. In kaliningrad port, there are still baltic and central european nato countries surrounding its area

    • @hyhhy
      @hyhhy 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@Hassaan-hp3cy That threat you describe is exactly what aircraft carriers would be useful for. They would add a lot of firepower to deal with such threats.

    • @4411825
      @4411825 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      But I thought the imperialist 4th Reich wasn’t a party to the war in Ukraine 🇺🇦😂🤣

  • @mikegrant8031
    @mikegrant8031 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Lol, it takes a while to build a aircraft carrier. Even if you know how.

  • @pathomthavaradhara
    @pathomthavaradhara 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    There is nothing wrong about dreams, but reality is even he stated today, it will take at least 2-3 years
    for planning and designing plus another 4-5 years to built one, assuming that the price tag may double
    or triple, have to retrain the Russian navy, he maybe be dead by the time it is built.

  • @blackhawkblackhawk2877
    @blackhawkblackhawk2877 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This is no news. Russia has been talking about this carrier for more than 8 years now long before the special miniature operation with Ukraine 🇺🇦

  • @americaneagle8019
    @americaneagle8019 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    How about you end this war, and spend the money on much needed infrastructure you putz.

  • @ariefpoerniawan
    @ariefpoerniawan 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I think it will be big mistake if russia new carrier still use ski jump ramp to launch aircraft… it should have catapult even steam is better than ski jump ramp…

  • @lutherngongang2863
    @lutherngongang2863 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Can he think about something else than something to kill people or get ready for war?

  • @robertboyle9146
    @robertboyle9146 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    They have a carrier and they never could figure out how to operate it or repair it. So why would they try to build and operate a more sophisticated carrier. They should become a peaceful nation maybe their people would have better lives.

  • @maynamar2517
    @maynamar2517 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Russia To Build Aircraft Carrier Armed With submarines

  • @garryb374
    @garryb374 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Russia does have an aircraft carrier. The Admiral Kuznetsov. Russia does need carriers if they want to operate in the worlds oceans they need to be able to operate in international waters amongst normal sea trade and pirates. The Pirates of HATO are very well armed and air power is useful over land and over sea. It improves situational awareness and reach. The difference of course is that a Russian carrier is not an invasion and colonial power carrier like western carriers. Russian ships carry air defence missiles and land attack missiles, an aircraft carrier for Russia will be an air defence carrier that protects their ships and shipping lanes from external influence.

  • @Dannyhunter1970
    @Dannyhunter1970 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Propaganda machine at work clowns 🤡

  • @robertryan7204
    @robertryan7204 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Well Hitler had MAUS tanks which were useless

  • @amandacollyer645
    @amandacollyer645 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    7 years repairing their one and only carrier? Yeah, I'm not worried.

  • @PAST0RYOUNG-um8tz
    @PAST0RYOUNG-um8tz 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    🐻🎖🎖🎖🎖🎖"KEEP TALKING 🐎💩💩 : WE ALREADY HAVE 2 AIRCRAFT CARRIERS"

  • @JoeBurnett
    @JoeBurnett 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It can be promoted to submarine like the rest of its naval crapheaps.

  • @0zeref
    @0zeref 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Yes carrier that doesn't exist and only make miniature mode 😂

  • @Spiegeltje22
    @Spiegeltje22 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Russia should take care of it s people instead of hopeless military adventures. This isn t te twentieth century anymore...

    • @wouterkellerman4458
      @wouterkellerman4458 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You surely mean murica😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

  • @MohamedMohamed-cr9fx
    @MohamedMohamed-cr9fx 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    just leave him be he's clearly crazy enough to think of building yet another arcraft carrier he cant even manage the first one he has so he shouldent even think about it.

  • @AuralioCabal-nl8gi
    @AuralioCabal-nl8gi 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    India will sell its Aircraft carrier Vikrant to Russia😂

  • @kenethantiga2534
    @kenethantiga2534 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Its too late. Building a single aircraft carrier could take more than a decade to become operational and a country like russia who is subject to multiple economic sanctions cannot secure all the resources needed to complete an aircraft carrier systems.

  • @ConfusedFlyingSaucer-co4be
    @ConfusedFlyingSaucer-co4be 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Nothing is too hard for the Russians they say they will do it they will do it

  • @wuhanChineseViras
    @wuhanChineseViras 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Slava Russia 🇷🇺

  • @allanjstark
    @allanjstark 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    So, most of the high level people already left the country, he will build this thing with khazakstani tec and know how!😮

  • @TrickShepherd
    @TrickShepherd 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Ice breaker carriers I can imagine they might build to operate in the Arctic ocean.

  • @YellowGun114
    @YellowGun114 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    If Russia collects all its scrap metal from Ukraine, at least they can use it to build the ship's hull.

    • @calanmacleod3948
      @calanmacleod3948 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      They don’t need scrap, they have huge deposits of every mineral required.

    • @YellowGun114
      @YellowGun114 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@calanmacleod3948 I bet the word recycling and environmental conservation are not the strong points for an extractive dependence economy like Russia's.

    • @tarasbolotov2486
      @tarasbolotov2486 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Plenty of scrap being transported back through Poland on Friday at least 10 military armoured vehicles 2 Abrahams on open flat artics 😢completely written off 😂😂😂😂😂

    • @YellowGun114
      @YellowGun114 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@tarasbolotov2486 Russians have a special bond with Abrams or "Abrahams" tanks. There's no day you guys don't talk about it.That's why your government pay you a reward for taking them out. It's a tacit acknowledgement of its superiority over whatever Russia has.

    • @randym7961
      @randym7961 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@calanmacleod3948 Maybe but your country doesn't have the facilities or know how to build a carrier,, just think Russia has never ever ever built one lol

  • @Peter-Dixonderass
    @Peter-Dixonderass 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    We must not be silent while witnessing injustice, i got thrown out of the LGBTQ community for being too gay...

    • @craig4867
      @craig4867 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      . Why don't you meet a woman 👠 that's part of being a man!

    • @elchicano187
      @elchicano187 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It’s OK Putin will now accept you into his inner circle

  • @jamessanthan2447
    @jamessanthan2447 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hi hi

  • @PedroLopez-bj6hq
    @PedroLopez-bj6hq 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    How hone missiles at su47 jets with drone boats

  • @naknak97
    @naknak97 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    but you cant afford. settle for giant rockets sir

  • @elevat1on
    @elevat1on 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hahah good luck!

  • @gregwilliams386
    @gregwilliams386 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    And......the only naval ship building yard big enough to build an aircraft carrier is in the Ukraine. And.... it takes years to build and an aircraft carrier and probably cost a gazillion Rubles.

    • @randym7961
      @randym7961 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      And that Yard is rotting so even if Russia took it , it wouldn't give them the ability to build one..

  • @Mic-uc2sm
    @Mic-uc2sm 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Ruzzia and aircraft carriers quite a comedy duo

  • @b21raider27
    @b21raider27 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    😂.
    Remember the very jealous comrades saying US aircraft carriers useless, 1 warp 9.99 speed (uhhh hypersonic) missile is all it ever takes.
    Putin’s super yacht navy I can believe in! Btw, his $700m one being upgraded in Italy,

    • @whodaFru4551
      @whodaFru4551 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      We talking about the same hypersonic missiles that got shot down by patriots?

  • @GamidRusiskyKatsapovitcvh
    @GamidRusiskyKatsapovitcvh 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    There is no way Russia can build this.

  • @danielmcleod2674
    @danielmcleod2674 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    i was fed the otherside with 0 secnds on the comments for 5 minutes

  • @sgladiadis
    @sgladiadis 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Interesting, where will they get the manpower to do that?

  • @Zindo.Majesty.HisMajesty
    @Zindo.Majesty.HisMajesty 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Well they did build a coal fired carrier a few years ago

  • @hervecyprienwansi3719
    @hervecyprienwansi3719 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    ❤❤❤❤❤❤🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉😊😊😊😊

  • @pooferfish1227
    @pooferfish1227 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    what a joke as if they could even afford one

  • @mikeluy
    @mikeluy 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Western experts on "Russian Shovel Theory!" 🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭

  • @wenbo595
    @wenbo595 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It needs frigates and drone mother ships

  • @mitchellculberson9336
    @mitchellculberson9336 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    SLAVA UKRAINI!!!!!!!

  • @paulwalker427
    @paulwalker427 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    such nafo copium - no it hasnt

    • @MausMasher54
      @MausMasher54 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Oh My, An Orc Troll in da Haus....

    • @whodaFru4551
      @whodaFru4551 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      🥲 russian tears so sweet

  • @James-uo1uh
    @James-uo1uh 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    No facts to support your position. Just BS.

  • @patrickducloux7426
    @patrickducloux7426 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    With submarine option

    • @usernwn7qe
      @usernwn7qe 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I don´t think it will ever progress that far given the SU57 has been in development since 2004 or so.

    • @patrickducloux7426
      @patrickducloux7426 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@usernwn7qe américain have super's carrer culture so englosh ans french with their nato ans impérial colonist interes
      russian sell their carrer to china and thé last one IS a catastrophic boat
      IS mane Admiral koutousov

  • @vaughnedwards1724
    @vaughnedwards1724 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The sea babies are waiting he is going to have to sail in the Siberian sea lol

  • @johntran3794
    @johntran3794 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂