Getting the Most Power From a Stirling Engine

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 18 มิ.ย. 2024
  • I show several ways to improve the efficiency and power of these simple engines.
    Lindy's video: • Stirling Engines - the...
    Help me make videos by donating here: / codyslab

ความคิดเห็น • 2.4K

  • @MrNight-dg1ug
    @MrNight-dg1ug 4 ปีที่แล้ว +48

    9:40
    "Okay, so I'm gonna turn on this electric heater!"
    *Electrifies all fish*

    • @jimmio3727
      @jimmio3727 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      That's not how low voltage electricity in relatively clean water works.

    • @2.5rs_subaru
      @2.5rs_subaru 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@jimmio3727 r/whoosh

    • @abhigyanmishra1743
      @abhigyanmishra1743 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@jimmio3727 r/whoosh

    • @AKiDNAMEDLAX
      @AKiDNAMEDLAX 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@jimmio3727 r/whoosh

  • @Sparrow_Bloodhunter
    @Sparrow_Bloodhunter 7 ปีที่แล้ว +73

    those poor fish, always having to put up with Cody's bullshit.

  • @hithere3247
    @hithere3247 4 ปีที่แล้ว +137

    Cody: *loses 12 hours on a small experiment that brings no real personal benefit to himself*
    Also Cody:*'Tis but a scratch*

  • @ecash00
    @ecash00 7 ปีที่แล้ว +384

    NOW,
    for the GEEKS OUT THERE....
    how about a stirling engine from a Heat sink on a computer???

    • @CrackedPlayz
      @CrackedPlayz 7 ปีที่แล้ว +44

      If you watch Lindy's video he mentions using spare heat of a serverbuilding to regain power

    • @ecash00
      @ecash00 7 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      Thats a server building..
      How much would a Rich geek pay for Lights and moving Things inside his case..

    • @CrackedPlayz
      @CrackedPlayz 7 ปีที่แล้ว +60

      Then I would recommend AMD parts for extra heat ^^

    • @HaplessIdiot
      @HaplessIdiot 7 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      An overclocked processor would be spades better at generating heat.

    • @robertgrenzray7657
      @robertgrenzray7657 7 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Damn that's a really good idea. If you have a large gpu with a backplate it would be difficult.

  • @gdxd7956
    @gdxd7956 7 ปีที่แล้ว +43

    A FYI from that i got from thermodynamics studying in college. A colder cold-source is more efficent than a hotter heat-source.
    That is, you will get more power if you decrease the cold source 5º than if you increase the heat source 5º.

    • @MrTrollicus
      @MrTrollicus 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      how so?

    • @gdxd7956
      @gdxd7956 7 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Math. And Algebra. Can't remember the exact formula explanation, it was pretty long.
      But, my physical explanation for it is, probably because the cold source (being colder) has more density of mass that can transfer heat out of the system. The heat source has less mass density and therefore is less efficient at transfering heat into the system.
      IE. the cold source can absorb energy faster than the heat source can put into it. Making cold more efficient at creating a bigger temp difference.

    • @caydjj
      @caydjj 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Gustavo XD the smaller in the difference in the heat reservoirs also leads to a much more efficient engine as well (at least for a Carnot engine)

    • @MrTazhiman
      @MrTazhiman 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Carnot cycle isn't it

    • @miguelescalantemilke7204
      @miguelescalantemilke7204 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I don´t think so. Eff=1-T1/T2 where T1 stands for the cool source, and T2 is the hot one. So you gotta make the difference as big as you can if you want efficiency

  • @biblical_figure
    @biblical_figure 7 ปีที่แล้ว +427

    You've been blowing up lately, it seems like yesterday when you were drinking cyanide at 700K subs

    • @Super1337357
      @Super1337357 7 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      TH-cam changed how people get promoted to try to promote higher quality content. The new system decided Cody is high quality.

    • @gamingmarcus
      @gamingmarcus 7 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      Cyanide, Mercury and a few explosions here and there is all you need on TH-cam.

    • @csrph
      @csrph 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      +mr1337357 That's because Cody IS and always has been high quality.

    • @bronsonstephens5799
      @bronsonstephens5799 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Ricardo Vazquez he definitely deserves it though.

    • @dylanzrim1011
      @dylanzrim1011 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Karl Wilson I got a boat load of views in a week then it dropped off and didn't come back. I guess it helps to upload regularly

  • @MrRolnicek
    @MrRolnicek 6 ปีที่แล้ว +222

    It's been a year and a half, I'd like to see that super efficient upscaled generator.

    • @kasai7272
      @kasai7272 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      MrRolnicek me too

    • @bearcatben4762
      @bearcatben4762 5 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      2 and a half years now

    • @jekanyika
      @jekanyika 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Tbf "some day" doesn't really put a timescale on it.

    • @finnice
      @finnice 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      He might do it for power on his mars project

    • @pimpdaddy1469
      @pimpdaddy1469 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Me too

  • @maxfreeman3764
    @maxfreeman3764 5 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    I love it when I find out my favourite channels have connections, especially when they don't even have much in common, lindybeige is amazing

  • @pinzgauernorcal
    @pinzgauernorcal 7 ปีที่แล้ว +469

    build a solar powered version using a fresnel lense for the heat scource

    • @0-Kirby-0
      @0-Kirby-0 7 ปีที่แล้ว +34

      And then put it into a high pressure chamber at as many psi as possible.

    • @pered5
      @pered5 7 ปีที่แล้ว +99

      You can't do that, the energy generated by the engine would create a black hole

    • @Alontrle
      @Alontrle 7 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      pered5 Energy doesnt make black holes. A large amount of matter collapsed in a small area of space. In order for energy to make a black hole you'd need the energy to transform into matter, abd even though E=MC^2 we have never been able to make a large amount of matter from energy, (or any at all to my knowledge)

    • @0-Kirby-0
      @0-Kirby-0 7 ปีที่แล้ว +172

      Alontrle | Gaming | Livestreams
      ☐ Got the joke
      ☑ Didn´t get the joke

    • @Taunus-Tim
      @Taunus-Tim 7 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      You mean one of these? de.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar-Stirling
      Or just google "solar dish"

  • @jellyman1735
    @jellyman1735 7 ปีที่แล้ว +133

    Oh hey look its Lindybeige!

    • @Locke3OOO
      @Locke3OOO 7 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      jeffrey damen a lot of fuckin nerds lmaoooo 😂😂😂👌👌👌👌👌

    • @jellyman1735
      @jellyman1735 7 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      I mean this is a sciency channel so yeah lots o' nerds here.

    • @TheSadButMadLad
      @TheSadButMadLad 7 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      The number of times I watch one channel to find that they also subscribe to a number of other channels that I watch. Great minds think alike - I think! :-)

    • @dubspool
      @dubspool 7 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      I mean Cody is a fan of Kurzgesagt considering he has a calendar for 12,017 HE

    • @FLOABName
      @FLOABName 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      LINDYBEIGE! BEIGE, GOOD!

  • @thief9001
    @thief9001 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I'm really glad you linked to lindy beige. he has a great channel and makes really good content, so I'm really glad to see you supporting him! I think I first some him through you or an AVE cross link. I just really like knowing all the engineering and science TH-cam channels follow and support eachother. it's really encouraging!

  • @johnladuke6475
    @johnladuke6475 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Cody suggesting Lindy? Gotta love when your favourite channels watch each other.

  • @MrPotatoPro
    @MrPotatoPro 7 ปีที่แล้ว +141

    I'm so glad you gave Lindy a shout-out, the guy has quality content that is often overlooked.

    • @tarzaan2603
      @tarzaan2603 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I frekn love lindybeige!!

    • @tarzaan2603
      @tarzaan2603 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Just read your username 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

    • @jamesswanson7213
      @jamesswanson7213 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Lindybeige is Awesome

  • @terrydavis8451
    @terrydavis8451 7 ปีที่แล้ว +88

    Today on cody's lab we make depth charges.

  • @Riker626
    @Riker626 6 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    Side note: due to the fanning motion of the wheel the heavier gasses will not settle at the bottom. There will be an even mixture of what ever gasses are in the bottle.

  • @catfish552
    @catfish552 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Yes! A Cody-Lindy connection was just what I needed to close the last gap in my Web of TH-camrs I Watch!

  • @jamesproffitt6304
    @jamesproffitt6304 7 ปีที่แล้ว +208

    Cody: "I hope I'm not bothering the fish."
    Fish: "OMG, we are going to be part of an experiment! We're all gonna die! RUN! RUN FOR YOUR LIVES!!!"
    OR
    Fish: "Oh wow! What is this spinny thing? Is it food? Why is it ticking? I can't eat it! Don't torture us, oh Great Wanderer of Land!"

    • @chasewilbur851
      @chasewilbur851 7 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      *swim

    • @Shepard_AU
      @Shepard_AU 7 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      I think they're more like "where's the explosives".

    • @Taunus-Tim
      @Taunus-Tim 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Nate Smith are you really going to tell us that ONE volt is a thread to these fishes?

    • @Taunus-Tim
      @Taunus-Tim 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Nate Smith and that would matter why? An increase in voltage? Just nope. Voltage doesn't pile up. This engine in this setup would eventually even slow down because the atmosphere in the bottle will heat up, decreasing tbe temperature difference for the engine.

    • @AlexRedstart
      @AlexRedstart 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The reason why they were swimming back and forth was because they were courting, based on their behavior i can tell that they are 2 males and a female, and they are in heat. So the way they were acting it's not related to the experiment itself. Now if the experiment was safe for the fish or not, that's a different discussion.

  • @kballwoof00
    @kballwoof00 7 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    I just bought a high temperature Stirling engine when you get it running it will vibrate so much it almost moves off the table. Its pretty epic.

  • @TheCsel
    @TheCsel 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    i recently learned about these from lindybeige's channel. I was curious to know more, and now you picked it up, sweet!

  • @kungfuasgaeilge
    @kungfuasgaeilge 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Aww, I've been watching both you and Lloyd's videos for ages, it's great to see the link. I feel like I'm in good company!

  • @____5t
    @____5t 7 ปีที่แล้ว +27

    this guy is my new favourite TH-camr

    • @bensullivan420
      @bensullivan420 7 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      Welcome to the club.

    • @5tonyvvvv
      @5tonyvvvv 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      check out angry grandpa

  • @terribleauthority
    @terribleauthority 7 ปีที่แล้ว +164

    Man, I love me some Sterling engnes!

    • @Phoenix88.
      @Phoenix88. 7 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      The worst part is that is not Sterling but Stirling LOL

    • @wyattroncin941
      @wyattroncin941 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Phoenix AF it's a sterling stirling engine. just ask lindybeige.

    • @Phoenix88.
      @Phoenix88. 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Nope

    • @marty7682
      @marty7682 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      yeah especilly when theyre with ice n stuff

    • @oliverturner1649
      @oliverturner1649 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Stop it you, Cody doesn't need to spell. He has the power of alchemy!

  • @fevensteather
    @fevensteather 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Love all of your videos and knowledge! I hope to see the larger version that you were talking about at the end of this ❤️👍

  • @Prince_Tricky
    @Prince_Tricky 7 ปีที่แล้ว +39

    What if you used Liquid Nitrogen as your cold source?

  • @KeystoneScience
    @KeystoneScience 7 ปีที่แล้ว +144

    Yes another video :D I had never heard of a sterling engine so thanks for the new knowledge!

    • @richard2mitchell
      @richard2mitchell 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      never played moded minecraft?

    • @KeystoneScience
      @KeystoneScience 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      richard mitchell haha, not for a long long time xD

    • @richard2mitchell
      @richard2mitchell 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Keystone Science yea same but i think it was in the mod forstery i think

    • @richard2mitchell
      @richard2mitchell 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      White Genocide Resistor yea it was buildcraft lol had to look it up

    • @JoTheVeteran
      @JoTheVeteran 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      What? Really? I expected you be someone who knew already. Well what are you still doing here, go build one, stat! :)

  • @earthbjornnahkaimurrao9542
    @earthbjornnahkaimurrao9542 7 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    the PV diagram shows that doubling the pressure should double the power.
    and since electrical power is proportional to voltage squared you should expect the second voltage to be roughly sqrt(2) or 1.41 times the first voltage.
    so 0.745 V / 0.520 V = 1.43 .... seems to check out!

    • @earthbjornnahkaimurrao9542
      @earthbjornnahkaimurrao9542 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      now I'm curious if this rule continues for 3, 4, 5 times the pressure, etc.
      3x pressure = 0.90 V
      4x pressure = 1.04 V
      5x pressure = 1.15 V
      etc.

    • @earthbjornnahkaimurrao9542
      @earthbjornnahkaimurrao9542 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      I think the speed of the engine would also be proportional to the sqrt of the power.
      so measuring the speed at twice the pressure it should be 1.41 times as fast as at normal pressure.

    • @johanengqvist4333
      @johanengqvist4333 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Earthbjorn Nahkaimurrao, Nice observation!

    • @cheaterman49
      @cheaterman49 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Checks out a bit too well IMO, doesn't account for friction in various parts of the engine as Cody points out in the video - these would really not be negligible in this scenario.

  • @jondoe2542
    @jondoe2542 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Loved the video!
    You're awesome Cody, keep up the good work.

  • @KURDinEXILE
    @KURDinEXILE 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    I really enjoyed this video. Thank you!

  • @jbeanp1
    @jbeanp1 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    **rage quit** **ad** Thanks TH-cam
    Side note NEARLY TO 1MIL CODY!!

  • @farLander1
    @farLander1 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Inching closer to 1mil. Congrats in advance, Cody!

  • @DiscountPeople
    @DiscountPeople 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    I love your videos, I run into them totally randomly too. Very good, much coolness.

  • @eric1052
    @eric1052 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Geez dude. I've never watched one of your videos without learning something new... Thanks a lot for all your input in your videos. you'd be an excellent teacher if you ever choose to be one

  • @adamgolden1802
    @adamgolden1802 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Getting close to 1 million cody! Happy new year's!

  • @leberkassemmel
    @leberkassemmel 7 ปีที่แล้ว +27

    Is it Sterling (Thumbnail) or Stirling (Title)? You have to choose one!

    • @isaaclegler234
      @isaaclegler234 7 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      Michi Lo It was invented by Robert Stirling, so it is in fact Stirling with an i.

    • @BobisKool
      @BobisKool 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Michi Lo - yes

    • @hiothezebra
      @hiothezebra 7 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      The Stirling engine is a sterling engine! She's a pun.

    • @hellterminator
      @hellterminator 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Stirling. The title originally also said Sterling. I guess fixing the title is easier than fixing the thumbnail.

    • @ziiofswe
      @ziiofswe 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      You could always make it in sterling silver...

  • @oklocapse
    @oklocapse 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you for uploading this on my birthday. I love the Sterling Engine.

  • @wolf1066
    @wolf1066 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    It's astounding how interconnected all the cool channels seem to be. I've watched Lindy's vids for years, I found your channel through watching Isaac Arthur and now I see a vid where you reference Lindybeige's channel.

  • @Xenol1997
    @Xenol1997 7 ปีที่แล้ว +158

    CODY AND LINDYBEIGE ARE AWARE

    • @jellystick2525
      @jellystick2525 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Emperor_Xenolius collab aye ?

    • @Xenol1997
      @Xenol1997 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      That would be heaven

    • @TheCsel
      @TheCsel 7 ปีที่แล้ว +37

      in next episode Cody and Lindybeige demonstrate how Hannibal dissolved rocks with vinegar and fire to cross the Alps.

    • @MathiasLaakkonen
      @MathiasLaakkonen 7 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Lindybeige mostly talks out of his ass though.

    • @commodorjack8633
      @commodorjack8633 7 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      but its damn good ass-talk.

  • @MrKelsomatic
    @MrKelsomatic 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I'm way late, but I'm so glad to find out that you're friends with LindyBeige

  • @johnmcclain3887
    @johnmcclain3887 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    About the time you made this video, I bought one exactly like it, off ebay. When it arrived, I replaced the stainless steel plates with aluminum, 1/16th inch, which doubled the rpm at least. I've played with many versions of this engine, from superheated, and cooled, to the simple "atmospheric" as this one, their best feature is their simplicity of design, and of driving needs, they are simply not "torque monsters" in any way, shape or form, but do very well with simple basic tasks such as pumping water from a mine, day and night, minimal service and maintenance. We've jumped past a great many basic engine designs that are perfect for specific tasks, because we tend to leap on "new", with little debate on "effective". These have great potential in any situation where one has differential temperature, and a "constant, low load engine need". The issue is one of choosing the application to meet the facts, not changing the situation to meet the needs of an engine. Most people don't know, we operated Newcomen's steam condensing engine, as most effective until the idea of wrapping music wire around a wrought iron boiler, allowed for a pressure engine, designed by James Watt, a century later. Most of our technology has come into its own, only when another technology makes it possible to do things vastly different, as "Bessemer steel" made possible high speed steam, and ultimately, diesel and gas engines. I've played with "atmospheric engines", flamesuckers, for many years, because they make great gifts, but first, because I found I could see the actual anular flow of gases, watching the action of the flame, "external combustion", sucked into the cylinder, something air, in a flow bench, with colored smoke, can only begin to show. I have long enjoyed your delving into the exotic, strange, and the general organic chemistry. Thanks for some really interesting work.

  • @alexandrevaliquette3883
    @alexandrevaliquette3883 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wow! Very clever way to demonstrate the theory, cheap n dirty like I love! I was aware of Sterling motors, but the Helium under pressure is brillant!

  • @A_Box
    @A_Box 7 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Wow this guy knows Lindybeige!

  • @jacobholt7481
    @jacobholt7481 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Hey Cody you should get some clear acrylic pipe and unscrewable endcaps and put a valve stem on it it would allow you to put way more pressure and show just how much power you could get

  • @NoOne-yt6yf
    @NoOne-yt6yf 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Always impressed with your stuff.

  • @KaosFireMaker
    @KaosFireMaker 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Cody is always really great about sending views to other channels, and sending people to things they want to see.

  • @russellwalker3830
    @russellwalker3830 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I swear when you build that it will be my favorite video on youtube.

  • @adrianadrian2735
    @adrianadrian2735 5 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I have always wondered if Stirling Engines can be used to harness energy from heat (which is lost energy) in many devices, essentially converting the heat into energy and keeping it in a loop

    • @littlesnowflakepunk855
      @littlesnowflakepunk855 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      there are two problems with this
      one, a stirling engine will eventually stop moving even though heat is being produced, because heat will creep into the rest of the engine through the base, and it relies on a temperature differential between the base and the rest of the engine in order to run. the greater the difference in temperature between the base and the rest of the engine, the faster the engine goes. for this reason, in addition to just stopping eventually, the conversion will get less efficient the longer it runs.
      the other issue is that stirling engines don't actually generate that much torque, and harvesting electricity from rotational movement steals rotational energy from that movement, requiring yet more torque to keep the thing spinning. these are the same reasons you can't have an electric car charge its own battery from the spinning of its wheels while it's driving - that would create a perpetual motion machine if it were possible.

  • @AdricM
    @AdricM 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Went back and rewatched after all these years. Still a fantastic video!

  • @Kelsdoggy
    @Kelsdoggy 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Such a cool guy Cody love the calm caring nature you have

  • @hernancoronel
    @hernancoronel 6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Hi Cody, how about building one on top of a compost bin and using the composting process as a heat source? It'd be a great recycling example! Thanks for the video it was awesome!

  • @zorrowhelgen3314
    @zorrowhelgen3314 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I like how your fish are trying to breed in the background

  • @brandonrothwell1570
    @brandonrothwell1570 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    I think your idea is great Cody keep up the good work

  • @BobMonkeypimp
    @BobMonkeypimp 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wow! Synchronicity at it's finest. I collect and run model steam engines & was just looking into getting my first Stirling engine in the future.

  • @vakusdrake3224
    @vakusdrake3224 7 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    You should see how fast you can make the stirling engine go by putting the base in liquid nitrogen and heating up the other side with whatever the hottest thing you can use that won't damage it is.

  • @alecviau8132
    @alecviau8132 5 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    When will you build a stirling engine Cody? it's 2019 and i'm still waiting!!! :)

    • @filonin2
      @filonin2 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Still waiting in 2020

    • @Jack-tu5zf
      @Jack-tu5zf 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Still waiting in 2021

    • @casemodder89
      @casemodder89 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      '22 right now. still interesting tech !

  • @TheMasonX23
    @TheMasonX23 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I rewatched Lindy's video, and when I returned, the app picked up where I left off, with you saying "now that you're caught up to speed..." Surprised me haha

  • @needarandomname4330
    @needarandomname4330 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    I'm definitely looking forward to that man!

  • @coolevi123
    @coolevi123 7 ปีที่แล้ว +129

    On Cody's next video he runs it in his vacuum chamber.

    • @CoolAsFreya
      @CoolAsFreya 7 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      coolevi123 impossible...

    • @TheTrojanMaker
      @TheTrojanMaker 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      why should you do that? for less energy???

    • @yannadeau8308
      @yannadeau8308 7 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      for less molecules friction but not at complete vacuum

    • @coolevi123
      @coolevi123 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      i know it wouldn't work

    • @ancapftw9113
      @ancapftw9113 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      coolevi123 I want to see if it worked at mars pressures and a co2 atmosphere.

  • @brotherlucker
    @brotherlucker 7 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    this wouldn't work in a vaccum, right? I still kinda wanna see it in a vacuum.

    • @theCodyReeder
      @theCodyReeder  7 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      well the power output would be proportional to the pressure and so if the pressure is zero...

    • @JyothiSwaroopM
      @JyothiSwaroopM 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Cody'sLab why

    • @0815Skorpio
      @0815Skorpio 7 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      a stirling engine works with gas pushing around, when you remove the gas it has nothing to work with so output is 0

    • @brotherlucker
      @brotherlucker 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      yeah, I know that, but i'd still like to see it try, maybe you could get it working with a really high pressure differential? Your vacuum chamber isn't perfect, after al

    • @LemmingGoBoom
      @LemmingGoBoom 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      If you have a high pressure differential... you don't have a vacuum. Well maybe on one side of it, but then the return stroke wouldn't work.

  • @randallmillican1359
    @randallmillican1359 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi Cody
    Love the video. One thing to understand the power output of the engine. This can be done by adding various loads (resistors) until the voltage starts to drop from the 1 V you measured. At that point measure the max current while 1 V output and measure the load amount. Now you know max power output.
    One step further is to know the efficiency. How much power in vs power out.
    Love you videos thanks for sharing.
    😊

  • @Jetblastjoe
    @Jetblastjoe 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    This was entertaining and informative.

  • @dingo23451
    @dingo23451 7 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    RIP that first Stirling Engine.

  • @dots5641
    @dots5641 7 ปีที่แล้ว +45

    Cody did you have the motor run back to your heating coil?????

    • @brotherlucker
      @brotherlucker 7 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      it wouldn't have generated nearly as much power

    • @theCodyReeder
      @theCodyReeder  7 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      no, I used a battery charger for that.

    • @dots5641
      @dots5641 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      The Crow I'm talking as an additive. Like to rev it up even more

    • @dots5641
      @dots5641 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Cody'sLab ok

    • @dots5641
      @dots5641 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The Crow like a feedback loop. Put energy in to produce energy in the engine and have the energy produced to go back into the heating coil so that it becomes a little less reliant on the energy you put in. Rinse and repeat. Although I think the heat might become too much for the engine to use for the same reason Cody stated where a lot of heat is lost.

  • @funkaddictions
    @funkaddictions 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    That's awesome! Great job!

  • @othtorpotato9960
    @othtorpotato9960 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Well I'm always up for watching more Lindybeige.

  • @chiimpy
    @chiimpy 7 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    Here come all the "Engne" comments.

  • @Taunus-Tim
    @Taunus-Tim 7 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Cody you seemed to ignore that the atmosphere inside of that bottle will heat up due to your heating wire. The cooling side of the sterling engine will also heat up and your temperature difference will drop. You might want to install some cooling mechanism for the "cold side" of your engine. If you ever build a large scale sterling engine you also should install a cooler. If you are in possession of some constantly cool groundwater for example you should use a watercooling.
    Again i want to point out that a sterling engine is an incredible engine with a high efficiency (if build well) but the relative low pressure difference compared to other combustion engines and the limited time to cool your working gas at high speed due to the missing gas load exchange, leeds to a really low power:weight ratio of such engines. We use a lot of sterling engines in germany combined with our home gas heatings. But those relatively heavy and large engines in stationary work have but a few horsepowers. Normally they generate about .5-2 kW electricity.
    The torque of sterling engines is pretty low, so that you have to run them at a high speed to gain the needed power, leeding to even less time for the heat exchange. Also one of the biggest issues why sterling engines aren't used in large scale is because you can't use any kind of lubricant like motoroil inside of the engine. You can't lubricant your pistons etc.so they tend to stuck and break at high revolutions. This makes it quite impossible to build engines in a realistic scale with a useful power output to run electrical engines etc. You always need high capacity batteries as a buffer.
    Nevertheless i really look forward to your large scale sterling engine! Please build one.

    • @thelastwoltzer
      @thelastwoltzer 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Taunus-Tims Welt he used the tank water to cooldown the bottle

    • @seededsoul
      @seededsoul 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Attila Junior That helps, but it only guarantees that the bottle won’t melt. It doesn’t keep it cool.

  • @Eragon954
    @Eragon954 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Can't believe, a crossover with the two best channels on youtube!

  • @rodneymoore7270
    @rodneymoore7270 ปีที่แล้ว

    WELL DONE! WELL DEMONSTRATED! THANK YOU!

  • @shawnwolff4490
    @shawnwolff4490 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Are you ever going to build the 10x version of the Sterling engine?

  • @hanafaizah9485
    @hanafaizah9485 7 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    Hey Cody, how many gallons is your goldfish tank? It looks a tad bit cramped there for 3 goldies

    • @theCodyReeder
      @theCodyReeder  7 ปีที่แล้ว +57

      They are only here temporary because their pond froze solid.

  • @chillypepperjr
    @chillypepperjr 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Im so glad you and Lindy are friends!!!

  • @risebad
    @risebad 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    you're the best, Cody!

  • @Amphinase
    @Amphinase 6 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    Question: Could you further improve the Sterling engine's effiency by using a hydrogen/helium mix? (hydrogen alone doesn't seem safe)

    • @jonathanstott3957
      @jonathanstott3957 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      what, you dont want to hindenburg the fish tank

  • @davidonfim2381
    @davidonfim2381 7 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Triops!!!! I've tried a couple of times to grow Triops, but they always die soon after hatching :(
    I don't know why.

    • @ReedLove
      @ReedLove 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Really? I've had pretty good luck with the little kits I've used in the past. Perhaps you're experiencing a temperature issue?

    • @davidonfim2381
      @davidonfim2381 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      That could be it, I don't have a good way of keeping the temperature at the right level. I didn't think the temperature changes would be enough to outright KILL them though. I've always kept them in my room, so it stays at a temperature comfortable for a human all the time.

  • @XavierBetoN
    @XavierBetoN 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    I just got the idea of stirling watercooling for cpu! Thanks for upload

  • @-NGC-6302-
    @-NGC-6302- 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Ha! I just watched his video last night! It's amazing how the TH-cam community is connected.

  • @thestalkinghead
    @thestalkinghead 7 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    ohh are those triops (and fairy shrimp) in the background? i get intermittently obsessed with them, but they have a reasonably short lifespan so i can have a break

    • @theCodyReeder
      @theCodyReeder  7 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      yes they are, I want to try using them instead of fish in an aquaponic system since they will eat waste leaves and such.

    • @8Jory
      @8Jory 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Cody'sLab please, oh please, post videos of your experiments with aquaponics.

    • @thestalkinghead
      @thestalkinghead 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      they would probably be slightly higher maintenance due to the short life cycle, but you could have a sort of egg nursery net made of fine mesh net inside the main tank and just empty it into the tank and refill it weekly (or a better timing) to keep the population up, then maybe the maintenance would even out due to them being slightly easier to feed

    • @verdatum
      @verdatum 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      8Jory, I miiiiiight be thinking of a different channel, but I think he did a bunch of videos about this a couple years ago. They were really good and in-depth too.

  • @TheNullreaper
    @TheNullreaper 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    You've got some synovial fluid in hand, yeah? I hear it's a great lubricant.

  • @chutneyferret3569
    @chutneyferret3569 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Would like to see a demonstration on heat recovery, the concepts are really well executed here, best video I've seen on it by a long shot.

  • @npsit1
    @npsit1 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    That's actually really cool. Good job. I suppose this could work on larger Sterling Engines as well. You could heat it with a waste oil burner. There is a lot of heat available from those and I suspect you could get a lot of energy from it - not just to make electricity but to heat water in your hot water tank or radiant floor heating - whatever.

  • @linardsrozitis7667
    @linardsrozitis7667 7 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    yes this is good to know, but you should test if it will run at all in vacuum chamber...

    • @shadowblast4
      @shadowblast4 7 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      Linards Rozitis it wouldn't as it requires air to operate plus heat transfer in a vacuum isnt great

    • @PKIVV
      @PKIVV 7 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Linards Rozitis No need to test, it would not because it's the air moving up and down the powers the engine.

    • @linardsrozitis7667
      @linardsrozitis7667 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      ok now I get it, thanks :)

    • @TechyBen
      @TechyBen 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I think you could use photon pressure (as he showed in his over videos) for a similar (but different designed) device. :D

    • @KaitharVideo
      @KaitharVideo 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      It won't run in a perfect vacuum for the reasons given, but a better question of similar taste is: At what pressure does it stop running? How high above sea level does a Stirling Engine work?
      Incidentally, the radio-thermal generators used in space probes are also based on thermal differentials, I guess the power output of those is limited by either black body thermal or your willingness to pack some kind of coolant? It's weird to remember that space isn't as "cold" as you'd think because there's so little thermal loss.

  • @STDrepository
    @STDrepository 7 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Whiteboard markers on paper? What kind of monster are you?

  • @Extasie57270
    @Extasie57270 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You absolutely have to do the big scale stirling engine, it will be so awsome i'm looking forward to that !!
    greetings from France :)

  • @DustyEggSauce
    @DustyEggSauce 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Rage quit!! Hahah nice. Appreciate the referral to Lindys video. That definitely made me understand the way these work, in a tad more detail ✌

  • @trulyinfamous
    @trulyinfamous 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Oh Cody, using a dry-erase marker on paper

  • @lukeb6394
    @lukeb6394 7 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    I understand that the thinner gasses make it go faster but I'm wondering if thicker gasses would make it stronger? like more torque?

    • @CondensedComments
      @CondensedComments 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Lukes I wondered the same thing, lol. I think all it does though is take longer to heat up and cool down.

    • @Tuxfanturnip
      @Tuxfanturnip 7 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      Its not a matter of speed vs torque, just overall wasted energy

    • @AndersJackson
      @AndersJackson 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Nope, it will only spend more energy moving gasses in the machine, not producing engergy.
      You can get the energy out in high speed or more torque. But it is still the same amount of energy.

    • @AvNotasian
      @AvNotasian 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes, it would since now less energy is wasted shifting gases around, its the reason it goes faster.
      The top speed is the speed at which the energy wasted per a cycle is equal to the energy generated per a cycle, if you were to reduce the waste you increase the max speed.
      The max speed comes about due to friction and other time dependant functions.
      Cody should have loaded the stirling engine to give a better demonstration, he assumed that was obvious though.

    • @garywithers852
      @garywithers852 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      To my understanding, Stirling engines are sealed, there is a fixed amount of working fluid or gas inside. So changing the gas in the bottle should not change the gas in the engine, it should be air.
      Unless I am missing something?.

  • @xander1052
    @xander1052 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Loved to see a full size one of these made by you in a video soon

  • @ahaveland
    @ahaveland 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent demonstration, and patience Cody!
    There are another couple of other factors - the surface area of the heat exchanger could be increased a lot using fins like a heat sink, preferably with a flow path to help the most gas to heat up/cool down.
    A smooth cylinder isn't going to be as effective as a rough or ribbed surface designed to maximize heat transfer.
    In addition to density and viscosity, different gases also have different heat capacities and conductivities so these will affect performance to some degree.
    Helium has a very low viscosity, but it also has a high heat capacity and thermal conductivity so it can absorb and release energy more quickly.
    It should be an ideal gas, if it didn't want to keep escaping to space forever...
    It would be interesting to see how hydrogen and the other noble gases perform.

  • @raa6504
    @raa6504 7 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Maybe you can use solar mirrors to direct the solar heat to the chamber, and water..

    • @jort93z
      @jort93z 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      thats basically a Concentrated solar power system. usually those use steam turbines though because its a lot more efficient.

    • @yield_yt
      @yield_yt 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Radu Adrian solar mirrors? Do you mean fresnel lenses?

    • @cakeswithbutterandsteroids7700
      @cakeswithbutterandsteroids7700 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      You can use mirrors, fresnel lenses are expensive for that type of aplication.

  • @skyr8449
    @skyr8449 7 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    Place giant stirling engines in hydrogen chambers on icebergs.

    • @MasterCedar
      @MasterCedar 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Need to be quick about it

    • @beaub152
      @beaub152 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Overlooked comment lol

  • @EngineerNick
    @EngineerNick 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    thanks for that dude that was a lot of fiddly work for that demo :)

  • @ne1cup
    @ne1cup 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    i watched this 3 times now,good info

  • @ezrafortner3690
    @ezrafortner3690 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I know conpost heats up quite a bit, maybe make it compost powered?

  • @caseynewland2614
    @caseynewland2614 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Where did you get your sterling engine that was used in the test?

    • @theCodyReeder
      @theCodyReeder  7 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      ebay

    • @caseynewland2614
      @caseynewland2614 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thank you

    • @adriancharkowski8411
      @adriancharkowski8411 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      How about if you use hydrogen gas inside the chamber instead of helium? Would it be more efficient? And what will be a difference in work on different pressure levels?

  • @amirreza6526gd
    @amirreza6526gd 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I just had thermodynamic lessons in my physics class
    And God, I wish our teacher could do/show experiments so that we could understand sooner!
    Now everything makes sense,
    Thanks a lot Cody

  • @toni7575
    @toni7575 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    you are a mad scientist. very interesting!

  • @Etheoma
    @Etheoma 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Cody pleas do the big Stirling Engine!!!

  • @omermagen824
    @omermagen824 7 ปีที่แล้ว +32

    Hey Cody. I heard about a something called Peltier Module which seems to be sort of a ''solid state Sterling engine''. I don't know a lot about it and it'll be nice if you could make a video about it as well.

    • @keenansmith6163
      @keenansmith6163 7 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Omer Magen peltier units use the same principle, the difference between temperatures on either side of it but I've heard it's not efficient at converting heat energy to electricity or cold energy

    • @AwsomeVids83
      @AwsomeVids83 7 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Keenan Smith Peltier junctions are extremely inefficient, I'm not sure how they compare to Stirling engines though. Also, there is no such thing as "cold energy".

    • @MsSomeonenew
      @MsSomeonenew 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Peltier elements reach about 1% or slightly over at their near melting point, they are great for small packaging and having no moving parts, but unless used merely as a minor power recovery device while heating something else there isn't much point.
      Stirling engines are predicted to possibly reach 50% power conversion, but we are talking extremely refined, insanely high pressure, several thousand degree type of devices. These toy ones only get a couple percent efficiency, some will only really turn themselves and nothing else.

    • @omermagen824
      @omermagen824 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      MsSomeonenew I heared that the Peltier module is used on some space probs such as Juno and the Voyager crafts. As those probs get very far away from the sun they need an alternative energy source. Using a piece of plutonium (which gives off heat) surrounded by Peltier elements, they are able to generate enough electricity for the prob's equipment.

    • @AwsomeVids83
      @AwsomeVids83 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Omer Magen The device which powers the Voyager spacecraft is called a nuclear battery. Also, the word is "probe" not "prob".

  • @monkeymanwasd1239
    @monkeymanwasd1239 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    thank you for being friends with him i love your channels

  • @mirvannascythes1764
    @mirvannascythes1764 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Great design and food for thought. I work in HVAC as a apprentice and have long wanted too make a stirling or steam setup for household power. You might want to try hydrogen, it goes even faster!~ But at the downside, hydrogen escapes it's container pretty easily, and you need too recharge such systems frequently. But there is one advantage, if you were too use solar+stirling as the energy source, you can than split water into hydrogen for a battery, some of which, you can use too bathe your stirling should it leak.