Stirling Engines - the power of the future?

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 27 พ.ย. 2016
  • Stirling engines are having a bit of a revival. What are they, and how do they work? Could they generate our electricity in the future? See the follow-up video: • Stirling engines - an ...
    Support me on Patreon: / lindybeige
    More ranty videos here: • Rants
    I like machines that show their workings. You can see all the parts of a stirling engine doing their jobs. Stirling engines are simple, but use a principle that may be unfamiliar to many viewers. One thing that you have to remember from your science classes is that gases expand and contract very rapidly indeed, making this sort of engine practical.
    Stirling engines are not very powerful nor do they have great power to weight ratios. I know of one annual boat race that takes place in England on a river using stirling engines, and it is somewhat sedate.
    Lindybeige: a channel of archaeology, ancient and medieval warfare, rants, swing dance, travelogues, evolution, and whatever else occurs to me to make.
    You can now buy the music I use over the end-plates of my videos, which was written as the theme music for The Adventures of Stoke Mandeville, Astronaut and Gentleman: lindybeige.bandcamp.com/releases
    ▼ Follow me...
    Twitter: / lindybeige I may have some drivel to contribute to the Twittersphere, plus you get notice of uploads.
    Facebook: / lindybeige (it's a 'page' and now seems to be working).
    Google+: "google.com/+lindybeige"
    website: www.LloydianAspects.co.uk
    / user "Lindybeige"

ความคิดเห็น • 6K

  • @JarthenGreenmeadow
    @JarthenGreenmeadow 3 ปีที่แล้ว +366

    "Its a stirling engine, and whats more its a stirling engine and you might be wondering: What's a stirling engine? Well, this is"
    *Video ends*
    I will never tire of your humor.

    • @dcarbs2979
      @dcarbs2979 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @charles wheelock It would also need to be Stirling Engine because it's a noun.

    • @GrumpaGladstone1809
      @GrumpaGladstone1809 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@dcarbs2979 "a Stirling engine", capital S after Robert Stirling, small e because engine is just a normal noun.

    • @dcarbs2979
      @dcarbs2979 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@GrumpaGladstone1809 I got it wrong i think.
      Stirling engine = Noun
      Stirling Engine = Proper noun
      Sterling engine / sterling engine = adjective. Make up your own pun accordingly :-)
      A Stirling Engine is a sterling engine.

    • @nicholasadams2374
      @nicholasadams2374 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@dcarbs2979 Yes. It's a sterling engine, and a Stirling engine. You got it :)

    • @billynomates920
      @billynomates920 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@nicholasadams2374 even if silver was the best material, i just haven't the sterling for a sterling sterling stirling engine but i reckon raheem has...

  • @munch15a
    @munch15a 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1272

    TO quote adam savage "this is not free energy but it is free to me energy"

    • @pablorepetto2759
      @pablorepetto2759 4 ปีที่แล้ว +91

      Or as the British may put it: "this is not free real estate, but it is free to _me_ real estate"

    • @Rid3thetig3r
      @Rid3thetig3r 4 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      @David Jones It was all given back. And see how they flourish...

    • @vegetorat
      @vegetorat 4 ปีที่แล้ว +27

      @@Rid3thetig3r Turns out life is a lot easier when someone else is telling you what to do. It's a lot harder when you gotta figure it out yourself.

    • @raygodwin3496
      @raygodwin3496 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      The very best kind in my humble opinion

    • @NwoDispatcher
      @NwoDispatcher 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Like slaves and communists

  • @nadaa2370
    @nadaa2370 4 ปีที่แล้ว +419

    I love how I have become an ardent defender and advocate of the Stirling Engine ten minutes into this video.

    • @ahmadtarek7763
      @ahmadtarek7763 4 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      Rightly so, they are almost better than other engines in every way , being silent, safe and lacking any waste product whatsoever, except for the power/weight ratio which unfortunately matters a lot.

    • @AcidxAnarchy
      @AcidxAnarchy 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@ahmadtarek7763 I'm sure the power and weight ratio can be improved upon greatly. You could probably improve it a lot just by adding a more intricate pulley system lol

    • @yetanother9127
      @yetanother9127 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      @@AcidxAnarchy I don't think pulleys would help--they'd just change the torque ratio, not the amount of energy coming out, which is useful for some applications but doesn't really help in terms of power generation. The main avenue of improvement is getting the weight down, I think.

    • @Xrayflames
      @Xrayflames 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@yetanother9127 i believe that there was an effort to make an electric car where the stirling engine didnt directly cause a car to drive, rather it charged a battery which powered the car. Quoting a piece on it "The MOD II project in 1980 produced one of the most efficient automotive engines ever made. The engine reached a peak thermal efficiency of 38.5%, compared to a modern spark-ignition (gasoline) engine, which has a peak efficiency of 20-25%. The Mod II project replaced the normal spark-ignition engine in a 1985 4-door Chevrolet Celebrity notchback. In the 1986 MOD II Design Report (Appendix A) the results showed that highway gas mileage was increased from 40 to 58 mpg‑US (5.9 to 4.1 L/100 km; 48 to 70 mpg‑imp) and achieved an urban range of 26 to 33 mpg‑US (9.0-7.1 L/100 km; 31-40 mpg‑imp) with no change in vehicle gross weight. Startup time in the NASA vehicle was a maximum of 30 seconds, while Ford's research vehicle used an internal electric heater to quickly start the engine, giving a start time of only a few seconds. The high torque output of the Stirling engine at low speed eliminated the need for a torque converter in the transmission resulting in decreased weight and transmission drivetrain losses negating somewhat the weight disadvantage of the Stirling in auto use. This resulted in increased efficiencies being mentioned in the test results."

    • @kyleb3754
      @kyleb3754 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      They are incredibly inefficient, using something like 40HP worth of fossil fuel to make 1 HP. Other than that, I would be a great advocate.

  • @FoxRiverBridge
    @FoxRiverBridge 4 ปีที่แล้ว +526

    "Churches don't traditionally move around all that much"
    Brilliant

    • @gabeclancy9937
      @gabeclancy9937 3 ปีที่แล้ว +62

      Evidently Lindy has not heard of Warhammer 40k.

    • @swampdonkey1567
      @swampdonkey1567 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I know Churchill’s family church is a museum in Missouri it is great.

    • @arthas640
      @arthas640 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Sounds like a circuit preacher, in the early days they were basically a priest with a bible, some wine, and bread on horseback who traveled town to town in rural communities too dispersed to support a full time priest (it occurred in catholic and protestant communities but I think it was more common in rural America and canada with their dispersed farms in the midwest)

    • @duskyflathead4483
      @duskyflathead4483 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      Laughs in imperator class

    • @slinky6481
      @slinky6481 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Unless they're on a fault line

  • @robertguttman1487
    @robertguttman1487 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4453

    Leave it to the British to invent an engine that could be powered by a cup of tea.

  • @harbl99
    @harbl99 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2408

    6:45 -- "Churches traditionally don't move around that much."
    Sage wisdom right there. Not to be overlooked.

    • @Clint945
      @Clint945 7 ปีที่แล้ว +62

      To be fair... he's not wrong! :p

    • @chriscos123
      @chriscos123 7 ปีที่แล้ว +105

      Beige wisdom

    • @ptonpc
      @ptonpc 7 ปีที่แล้ว +31

      Although in the novels by Alistair Reynolds, the churches do move..

    • @sergepokorny3972
      @sergepokorny3972 7 ปีที่แล้ว +65

      They do tent to create big movements though.

    • @str_j1649
      @str_j1649 7 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      I've seen some and they weren't moving at all.

  • @alerty8791
    @alerty8791 5 ปีที่แล้ว +523

    my guess that these engines would be really good in Iceland, using the geothermal heat and the icy climate would perfect

    • @0isay
      @0isay 3 ปีที่แล้ว +23

      That's how man-made climate change should be done! :)

    • @theenhancer
      @theenhancer 3 ปีที่แล้ว +83

      True but geothermal is once again more efficient to heat water for steam turbines.

    • @sevenproxies4255
      @sevenproxies4255 3 ปีที่แล้ว +69

      @@theenhancer Why not put stirling engines on top of it?
      I mean, with steam turbines you still have waste heat.

    • @sbkenn1
      @sbkenn1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +29

      Steam turbines are easier to build and maintain. Iceland doesn't need energy efficiency. They have far more heat than they can usefully harvest, but they are too far from other populations to export it.

    • @Tubespoet
      @Tubespoet 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Iceland? Canada has lots of cold, does it have geothermal as well? Just thinking out loud.

  • @sameggenton1077
    @sameggenton1077 3 ปีที่แล้ว +493

    “Churches traditionally don’t move around all that much”
    Clearly he’s never heard of warhammer

    • @benaskalinskas4154
      @benaskalinskas4154 3 ปีที่แล้ว +36

      that's why he said "traditionally"

    • @martinlagman
      @martinlagman 3 ปีที่แล้ว +23

      If Billy doesn't go to church, then the church will come to Billy!

    • @cupofearlgreytea7651
      @cupofearlgreytea7651 3 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      @@martinlagman HERESY DETECTED

    • @1tuuber
      @1tuuber 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I was interested in the engine until he started talking. It's 95% his ego and 5% about the Sterling....

    • @Aaron-is8yt
      @Aaron-is8yt 3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      @@1tuuber The funny thing is, your comment shows way more ego than he allegedly showed.

  • @MonoMan1
    @MonoMan1 5 ปีที่แล้ว +717

    "It's powered by ice, that's cool!"
    Doesn't even flinch.

    • @vinayseth1114
      @vinayseth1114 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Ya he's not Michael from VSauce.

    • @RDO-tw4qn
      @RDO-tw4qn 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Lindies hard if humor.... That's what makes him so funny.

  • @brandontrueblood9798
    @brandontrueblood9798 3 ปีที่แล้ว +153

    You left out the "regenerator" which was what set the Stirling apart from the other closed cycle heat engines of the day. The regenerator is a thermal baffle and battery which thermally isolates the hot and cold sections of the engine. As the hot air passes through the regenerator a portion of the heat in the air is transferred to the material of the regenerator, as the temperature drops the pressure of the working fluid drops at a rate proportional to the change in temperature thus aiding flow from the hot section to the cold section by the induced negative pressure differential. Truly a Brilliant solution to closed cycle heat engine problem efficiency conundrum. Sorry, I had to bitch about it, my inner mechanical engineering nerd would not be quiet. Amazing engine developed by a Minister who was tired of watching members of his congregation get blown up. I love your videos, thanks for your excellent explanations and humorous descriptions.

  • @Gearz-365
    @Gearz-365 4 ปีที่แล้ว +532

    We should have an era called "Stirlingpunk." Like steampunk, but with Stirling engine technology rather than steam

    • @consciousness147
      @consciousness147 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      BRilliant!!!

    • @chaoticmasterpiece
      @chaoticmasterpiece 3 ปีที่แล้ว +46

      Too late. It's nuclear energy era soon, if not already. People are just scared of it for absolutely no reason.

    • @main135s
      @main135s 3 ปีที่แล้ว +23

      @Yes No Let's not forget stories like... I don't know... a tidal wave hitting Japan, causing a Nuclear Reactor to detonate as a level 7 accident. (Fukushima, 2011)
      Nuclear power isn't as dangerous as people say, but that doesn't mean it's not dangerous, and doesn't mean that it can't leave an area a health hazard for tens of years. Potentially upwards of 40, just to handle removing all the fuel from Fukushima.

    • @antiagonista
      @antiagonista 3 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      @@main135s it's still safer than hydro power

    • @chaoticmasterpiece
      @chaoticmasterpiece 3 ปีที่แล้ว +41

      @@main135s Now, if people had stopped using steam power because they blew up, where would we be? It applies to the same area, especially since nuclear energy is now safer than it used to be, and less wasteful.

  • @Jaxon_America
    @Jaxon_America 4 ปีที่แล้ว +68

    "From flywheel to good!"
    Lindybeige-2k16

  • @philipocarroll
    @philipocarroll 5 ปีที่แล้ว +290

    The Stirling Engine, the engine of the future since 1816

    • @sirsydneycamm1883
      @sirsydneycamm1883 4 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      Give it a chance, it's only 23:24 now. Maybe it's the engine of tomorrow.

    • @BenMitro
      @BenMitro 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Just like fusion power.

    • @kevinclass2010
      @kevinclass2010 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Mazda will probably buy the license and make a RX9 with it.

    • @DavidEllis94
      @DavidEllis94 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Penguiniel Fusion with direct energy conversion or gtfo.

    • @robertbennett9949
      @robertbennett9949 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Like nuclear fusion perhaps.....always 30 years away.

  • @antonhaeffler784
    @antonhaeffler784 5 ปีที่แล้ว +655

    I'm currently writing a paper on a Swedish energy company which uses stirling engines to take advantage of excess gasses from heavy mining operations.
    Normally these gases are too "rough" to be used so they are just burned straight into the air. Since the stirling engine only needs a temperature difference, it can operate using the heat created from the burning of these excess gasses. Therefor, a lot of energy that was previously wasted can now be turned into electricity.
    It's really interesting how something so simple can work. I think this technology has huge potential for the future.

    • @evoliveoil
      @evoliveoil 5 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      Can I read your paper?

    • @antonhaeffler784
      @antonhaeffler784 5 ปีที่แล้ว +42

      @@evoliveoil It's sadly not published anywhere, and it's in swedish. But you can look up the company if you want, it's called Ripasso Energy. :-)

    • @evoliveoil
      @evoliveoil 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@antonhaeffler784 Thanks.

    • @SkullCandy5671
      @SkullCandy5671 5 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      i wonder if it would be more efficient to use those gasses to spin a turbine

    • @CUBETechie
      @CUBETechie 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@hakimmohamad6216 in Iceland they use the Steam to power the turbine.

  • @patrickeh696
    @patrickeh696 5 ปีที่แล้ว +394

    A Stirling engine powers the quietest and most deadly attack submarine in the world...

    • @archivearchive9457
      @archivearchive9457 5 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      Hi do you have any links and why a Stirling engine was used? I'm doing a project about Stirling engines and would love to know where they're being used and for what reasons they chose to use Stirling engines

    • @patrickeh696
      @patrickeh696 5 ปีที่แล้ว +54

      @@archivearchive9457 Why? Low noise for one. The USN had it attack an alerted Carrier group TWICE and both times it penetrated ALL ASW assets and sunk our super carrier. Go to the sub manufacturers website

    • @justarandomtechpriest1578
      @justarandomtechpriest1578 4 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      @@archivearchive9457 theres a type of sonar that detects noise from the sub engine

    • @timearly5226
      @timearly5226 4 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      @@archivearchive9457
      The secret to the world’s most silent submarine
      saabgroup.com/media/stories/stories-listing/2015-02/the-secret-to-the-worlds-most-silent-submarine/

    • @pagarb
      @pagarb 4 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      @@timearly5226 yeah but I understand that every so often the crew has to do what Lindybeige did, which is to put their hands on the engine to restart it..

  • @Plus_Escapee
    @Plus_Escapee 4 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    Robert Sterling was one of the scientists that Tesla took great interest in. I don't belief this platform has been applied to it's maximum potential yet, so I'm sure it will play it's part in future energy production.

  • @wheturangi
    @wheturangi 7 ปีที่แล้ว +129

    I know of an old Stirling engine that is used for a water pump at a farm. Been there for at least a hundred years as there is a bronze plate with the year 1890 on it. It's big and clumsy, but just does its job and seems to need very little upkeep.

    • @sheepieworks4974
      @sheepieworks4974 7 ปีที่แล้ว +38

      yeah it just goes round and round. nothing more and nthing less. no explosions. no nothing. just some warmth and some cold and there ya go

    • @dangerouswitch1066
      @dangerouswitch1066 6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Fascinating, i would like to see a picture.

    • @graemeallan54
      @graemeallan54 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      photo?these were used on american farms cos wood was every where

  • @ahmjamil0
    @ahmjamil0 5 ปีที่แล้ว +340

    We used a Stirling engine powered fan when I was very young. It ran on kerosin/paraffin oil. There was a regenerator. My father had purchased it in the 1940's in Kolkata. We used it when there was a power outage, which was more often than not.

    • @ballHand
      @ballHand 5 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      very cool

    • @putheflamesoutyahoo1503
      @putheflamesoutyahoo1503 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      still have it?

    • @vinayseth1114
      @vinayseth1114 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I actually came here after watching a post shared on Facebook showing the type of fan you just mentioned! Thanks for sharing :)

    • @ahmjamil0
      @ahmjamil0 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@putheflamesoutyahoo1503 No, that was almost 70 years ago.

    • @bobcostas6272
      @bobcostas6272 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Neat

  • @GusCraft460
    @GusCraft460 4 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    Actually, close to the equator you could basically modify it to word as a sort of solar-sterling engine. Paint the top black to absorb heat and keep the bottom in in the shade and you can still get a decent output, especially considering that you aren’t even using fuel.

    • @Caesar-do2pl
      @Caesar-do2pl ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Could also make some sort of water cool at the bottom.

  • @d_knightly7225
    @d_knightly7225 5 ปีที่แล้ว +42

    This could well be the most interesting video I've seen on TH-cam.

  • @Ganbalf
    @Ganbalf 7 ปีที่แล้ว +69

    Stirling engines are great. Sweden has a submarine powered with a stirling engine, The US has come to call it "Swedens little carrier killer" It is close to impossible to detect, The US navy literally could not find it, During exercises it "sunk" several of the US's atomic submarines and the largest aircraft carrier, The USS Reagan and was still not detected.
    The sub is called the HMS gotland

    • @Ganbalf
      @Ganbalf 7 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      Swedens politics might be littered with feminists, and our army may the small AF, and we may be pacifists, But we do know how to build military equipment

    • @arudegesture
      @arudegesture 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Yeah, because we're selling it to anyone willing to pay. Shameful, really.

    • @antred11
      @antred11 7 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      While quiet submarines are definitely a lethal threat, let's not forget that this happened during a time where the US Navy was exceptionally crappy at anti-submarine warfare due to negligence and excessive post Cold War budget cuts. They are trying to remedy those problems now.
      Also, a sub that was set up specifically to test the US Navy's ASW defenses is one thing. Actually finding the carrier group out in the ocean, positioning the sub to intercept it and then penetrate its defenses and attack the carrier is quite another.

    • @marklarizzle
      @marklarizzle 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      antred thats interesting.

    • @BigBoss-sm9xj
      @BigBoss-sm9xj 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Lazor XD I love it

  • @founoe
    @founoe 7 ปีที่แล้ว +529

    I'm looking forward to Stirling-punk.

    • @xiaoxiao01
      @xiaoxiao01 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      i thought the same thing xD

    • @fernandocabette6050
      @fernandocabette6050 7 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      You might want to look into solar punk, it is already thing. Quite interesting actually.

    • @foodfoodfood8898
      @foodfoodfood8898 7 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      The cities in the book series Mortal Engines are powered by Stirling Engines. Though the cities don't exactly remain still...
      Peter Jackson is producing a movie of it in December 2018.

    • @Strideo1
      @Strideo1 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I think it already fits in with steam punk, really. No reason to create a new genre for it.

    • @fernandocabette6050
      @fernandocabette6050 7 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      I guess it could be kind of a anti steam-punk if you will. While steam-punk is usually dark and dystopian, compounded by the dirty looking soot etc, a stirling punk could be the exact opposite as with delivering clean and fresh energy.

  • @Barttek
    @Barttek 4 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    This is amazing! As I was learning physics in school, I always wondered if there is an engine, that could turn heat into power instead of just disposing of it.

    • @trouts4
      @trouts4 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Well.... steam turbines :)

  • @BL4D3RUNN3R0M3N
    @BL4D3RUNN3R0M3N 5 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    Really cool to see a video of someone so knowledgeable & passionate about such an obscure technology. I think we all have that one weird passion we can relate with. Thanks for sharing!

  • @TheGreatSteve
    @TheGreatSteve 7 ปีที่แล้ว +122

    You've mentioned two shit bands in this episode, One direction and Cold plate.

    • @TheSecondVersion
      @TheSecondVersion 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Thumbs up for the wordplay

    • @TheGreatSteve
      @TheGreatSteve 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Vito C Coldplay wordplay no less. :-)

  • @TheTank1900
    @TheTank1900 7 ปีที่แล้ว +61

    This could be really useful to me as an amateur science fiction writer. I was looking for a method to 1) get rid of excess heat without massive heat dispersers, and 2) provide some power to the internals of a ship without putting a massive nuclear reactor or something and taking some of that power from the engines and routing it into the ship. This could be really useful for both of those tasks. Thank you, Lindybeige, for proving that you never know when learning for the sake of learning might come in handy.

    • @lindybeige
      @lindybeige  7 ปีที่แล้ว +24

      Be careful if you mean SPACE ship, because seawater around a submarine carries heat away whereas the vacuum of space does not.

    • @moosemaimer
      @moosemaimer 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      You need something to turn heat energy into radiation so it can be emitted into the vacuum. The space station has large radiators unfolded from its modules, that look like solar panels only white.

    • @NarpytheCrimeDog
      @NarpytheCrimeDog 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The vacuum of space does allow heat to travel through it, though. Not as well as an atmosphere, but heat does travel through space.

    • @HammaneggsAirborne
      @HammaneggsAirborne 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      As Lindy said, space can't carry the heat away very well. The reasoning behind it is that because space is nearly empty, you can't really get the heat dispersed very well. In water you have lots of particles in which to send heat, and it can dissapate into the rest of the water. In space, well, you just have the occasional particle hit you.
      IMO, you would be better off with some sort of system that dispenses something with low mass and high heat capacity. Rockets work so well because they are shooting most of the heat that they generate away from themselves in the form of very fast particles.

    • @ZombieSurvivalist11
      @ZombieSurvivalist11 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Great video Lindy! I enjoy your video and almost always learn something.
      It might be a cool video idea if you compare and contrast different energy sources. Like the pros and cons of nuclear power vs wind turbines or hydroelectric damns vs geothermal wells and just do one big video on how they all could work and the most viable for the future.
      Might be a long video but I'm sure a lot of people would be able to learn a lot from it.
      Greetings from the U.S.!

  • @Persephon94
    @Persephon94 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Just thought I come back to this video: This was the one that hooked me into subscribing to you, and later inspired one of my nation's submarine navies in their subartic seas.Keep up the good work Lloyd!

  • @rudsong35
    @rudsong35 4 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    "What is a Stirling Engine?"
    - Loydboy: Well... this is!
    Directed by George Lucas

  • @bitfreakazoid
    @bitfreakazoid 7 ปีที่แล้ว +33

    That transition to the trying something hot segment. Was not expecting that and I busted out laughing.

  • @Someloke8895
    @Someloke8895 7 ปีที่แล้ว +156

    There is actually an automatic teaspoon machine, a Stirring engine.

    • @absurdist5134
      @absurdist5134 7 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      It'll revolutionize the world.
      Well, maybe not, but it'll definitely be a hit in Britain!

    • @jeffsmith8197
      @jeffsmith8197 7 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      I had a clothes washer once that was 31 years old, required little energy and worked perfectly. Couldn't cook very well, though.

    • @crestfallensunbro6001
      @crestfallensunbro6001 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      why were you cooking with a clothes washer?

    • @jeffsmith8197
      @jeffsmith8197 7 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      matthew hurley Because I thought that she could do more then one thing. :-)

    • @charleswood4635
      @charleswood4635 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Jeff : Bet you ate a lot of soup.

  • @erg0centric
    @erg0centric 4 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    Please consider the irony of measuring Sterling Engine output in Watts, the inventor of the reciprocating steam engine.

    • @temkin9298
      @temkin9298 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      It makes sense
      On a different note:
      Don't you feel like these engines could be viable when there is a great difference in temperature like magma in antarctica.
      Then again when you try to do that you will inevitably heat up the surrounding air.
      Maybe in a different planet. One in where it is -45°C. Can be also used to heat up the planet.

    • @ghostwheelppk
      @ghostwheelppk 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      We could create a new unit, pounds Stirling - feet per second.

  • @AnAfricanApe
    @AnAfricanApe 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I have a lab lesson today at Uni and we're using one of these for our experiment this week. I came here to get a head start and I'm glad I did! I feel like I'm going to go in much more prepared now. Thanks!

  • @pcarrierorange
    @pcarrierorange 7 ปีที่แล้ว +25

    But what if you strapped a sniper rifle to it?
    Can it end my opponents as rightly as a pommel?
    THESE QUESTIONS NEED ANSWERING!

    • @spud4242
      @spud4242 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      now if we use the barrel of a spandau as the hot end......

  • @Ricardo8388
    @Ricardo8388 7 ปีที่แล้ว +55

    Cold is what you feel when the object STEALS your energy to HEAT itself

    • @Ricardo8388
      @Ricardo8388 7 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Like water steals your heat to evaporate which it finds more comfy

    • @weebmarck9833
      @weebmarck9833 7 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      NOOOO NOT MY HEAT I WILL KILL IT

    • @1234macro
      @1234macro 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Damn you and your elementary education!

    • @Ricardo8388
      @Ricardo8388 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Lord Geezmo Well I like to explain things in its elementary form..so all dummies understand :)

    • @pandemiceclipse6596
      @pandemiceclipse6596 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I can finally say I'm so hot that it makes things melt!

  • @beshkodiak
    @beshkodiak 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I do so enjoy your so British calm but enthused way of speaking. A couple of my professors spoke this way and it kept my interest up to pass with rather good grades.

  • @robertdouville74
    @robertdouville74 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Bravo, I love it, I add today to my knowledge in mechanics, the counter part of what I was familiar with the electric thermocouples, who can use the differences in temperature to create energy also.

  • @LadyLunarSatine
    @LadyLunarSatine 7 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    This has me contemplating something for a fantasy setting where some enterprising spellcaster/engineer figures out a way to place gates to the Elemental Plane of Fire and the Elemental Plane of Water on opposite sides of a massive Stirling frame in order to power a death ray.

    • @JudgeDeadMJ
      @JudgeDeadMJ 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      That'd be great, actually.

    • @ancapftw9113
      @ancapftw9113 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Solemn Howler why not just trap air elemental in VAWTs?

    • @josephpotter5766
      @josephpotter5766 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      assuming magic that violates physical principles and machines that rely on those physical principles means that it is almost always a trivial exercise to create perpetual motion or over unity engines in fantasy settings... as a writer and creator i find it much more interesting to try and explain why they have not been created already, as otherwise every fantasy setting undergoes a magitech based industrial revolution as soon as you start applying common sense engineering.

    • @blazednlovinit
      @blazednlovinit 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Keep a lobotomised dragon on top of one?

    • @Jmat-tc8zs
      @Jmat-tc8zs 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      That sounds pretty awesome

  • @mcpartridgeboy
    @mcpartridgeboy 7 ปีที่แล้ว +24

    wow good video i had no idea a sterling engine could cure loanliness and depression for 20 mins , thankyou ! basic science is really interesting to me !

  • @slackerpope
    @slackerpope 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent video and very interesting. I've always wanted to see a video like this. Thank you! Cheers!!!

  • @Fredministrator
    @Fredministrator 4 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    now and then I come back here just to watch the first 20 seconds again

  • @TheTrueReiniat
    @TheTrueReiniat 7 ปีที่แล้ว +146

    You could even attach them to standard combustion engines to get extra power from the wasted heat.

    • @niffenator2395
      @niffenator2395 7 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Or use a turbocharger to better effect

    • @foobar201
      @foobar201 7 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      No. The stirling engine is less effective in carrying heat away from the primary engine than a proper cooler, thus the cool end of the primary engine is not as cool anymore and it loses efficiency. The loss in the primary engine is always greater than what the second engine would produce.

    • @evil001987
      @evil001987 7 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      +niffenator An engine with turbochargers are still producing waster heat.
      +foobar201 The heat will still have to go somewhere. The cooler can carry the heat away from the engine and to a stirling engine. And it doesn't matter if it can produce energy for all of the lost energy in heat. If it is effective enough to make up for its weight it can add to a more fuel efficient car.

    • @niffenator2395
      @niffenator2395 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Patrik Lilja ALL heat engines must reject some heat in order to work. A turbocharger can be used to increase the thermal efficiency of the engine however by recovering waste energy from the exhaust.

    • @evil001987
      @evil001987 7 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Yes? So? That is waste energy from the exhaust. The stirling would not interfer with the turbocharger as it will be powered by the waste heat outside of the exhaust.

  • @curtisbrown547
    @curtisbrown547 7 ปีที่แล้ว +84

    the qeustion is can it power a modified spandau that shoots katanas

    • @worldsfutureleader5952
      @worldsfutureleader5952 7 ปีที่แล้ว +25

      god damn it

    • @ScienceDiscoverer
      @ScienceDiscoverer 7 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      Only katanas with pommels will do enough dmg to be useful!

    • @inferno7181
      @inferno7181 7 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      But only of those pommels can unscrew

    • @almachizit3207
      @almachizit3207 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      As long as they end them rightly

  • @biblehistoryscience3530
    @biblehistoryscience3530 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Your reference to Brownian Motion (say a nice hot cup of tea) reminded me of the Infinite Improbability Drive from the Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy. Well done, old chap!

  • @stevesloan7132
    @stevesloan7132 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Wow, he actually used the phrase,"Brownian motion!" Magnificent! Bravo! What's next? Boyle's Law? Keep up the good work pal!

  • @Snailman3516
    @Snailman3516 7 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    actually, the Antarctic idea is pretty good, Lindy. The center of the earth has a lot of radiation heating and it is set to last for millions of years. Unless we do some very stupid things to the earth, the Antarctic will always be incredibly cold as heat radiates out of the Antarctic.

    • @Snailman3516
      @Snailman3516 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      it won't heat up the Antarctic because the heat will just radiate into the sun. It's the trapping of that radiation that leads to all kinds of climate change. Simply moving raw kinetic energy into the Arctic won't change anything unless it is on a scale that would fry the earth.

    • @mattpelzek3809
      @mattpelzek3809 7 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      There's a particularly good place for it: Mount Erebus is a volcano in antarctica. Extreme heat and extreme cold, all in one place.

    • @absurdist5134
      @absurdist5134 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Well, yes, but we don't actually use much energy in Antarctica. I think you'll find transporting the energy to anywhere useful to be somewhat of a hassle.

    • @Snailman3516
      @Snailman3516 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Absurdist then just move some industries to Antarctica.

    • @absurdist5134
      @absurdist5134 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Equal opportunity means a job for every penguin!

  • @stenrod2383
    @stenrod2383 7 ปีที่แล้ว +332

    But the real question is, can it power a bren gun?

    • @peridoodle2644
      @peridoodle2644 7 ปีที่แล้ว +63

      The real real question is, can we design a Bren gun that requires a Stirling engine to run?

    • @garethbull2226
      @garethbull2226 7 ปีที่แล้ว +29

      Think bigger. Can it power a Tesla death ray?

    • @jackdaniels4975
      @jackdaniels4975 7 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      Can we design a Bren gun that uses the power of a Stirling engine that shoots pummels?

    • @eclipseslayer98
      @eclipseslayer98 7 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      Think even bigger, can it power a pommel catapult?

    • @jackdaniels4975
      @jackdaniels4975 7 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Eclipseslayer98
      A pommel minigun?

  • @pointer2null
    @pointer2null 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    First video of yours I've every come across and I love your style!

  • @jdraper12
    @jdraper12 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I'm about halfway through your video, but it may interest you to know that Sterling engines are perfectly viable and are used for spacecraft power generation. They have a fairly decent specific power

  • @MikeysPsyche
    @MikeysPsyche 7 ปีที่แล้ว +43

    GEEZ! The damn "BEIGE!" scared the absolute shit out of me!

  • @miken7918
    @miken7918 7 ปีที่แล้ว +98

    and it was in a blackened saucepan, I would've liked the video, but did you see the state of his saucepans

    • @mitchrils
      @mitchrils 7 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      mike n He's made a video on it.

    • @miken7918
      @miken7918 7 ปีที่แล้ว +24

      That was the joke

    • @guitarlover1204
      @guitarlover1204 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      use that blackened saucepan of yours to do a facepalm mate....
      a facepan...

    • @reececrump8483
      @reececrump8483 7 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      awful. horrible sauce pan maintenance. his family should be ashamed

    • @mortimersnead5821
      @mortimersnead5821 7 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Since this is an engineering video, the black residue means that his range is burning it's fuel inefficiently. A well designed gas stoved, working properly should give off nothing but clean blue flame.
      Because of this, Lloyd's utility bill is a little higher than needs be, but the marginal cost is probably too small to justify a new range.

  • @trevorthieme5157
    @trevorthieme5157 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    10:50 That has to be one of the more pleasant intermissions to listen to! lol

  • @tonymoon4525
    @tonymoon4525 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Just love your enthusiasm. The Best Of British. Thank you.

  • @jMcWill781
    @jMcWill781 7 ปีที่แล้ว +31

    This one earned my thumbs up in the first 35 seconds

    • @olliephelan
      @olliephelan 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Its so graceful , ye could watch it all day .

    • @olliephelan
      @olliephelan 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      yeah , stick it on a cool can of beer and let the fans cool your face !
      But meditate to nothing
      If your concentrating on something your not meditating , your concentrating

    • @olliephelan
      @olliephelan 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      FlyingAxblade emmm.....yeah , I suppose it would ......But on a scorching day , and you want a cool beer / put it on your can and it could fan your face (for a while )(i think)(maybe)....................
      I want Lloyd to muse about the roman dodecahedron

    • @olliephelan
      @olliephelan 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      FlyingAxblade I was just searching it , and a chap actually knitted a perfect set of gloves using each hole for the different fingers and the "nodes" were essential to knitting it .
      And it makes sense considering most were found in cold Gaul rather than warmer countries .
      Theres a vid on him doing it .
      I was a bit skeptical at start but when I saw the finished result it was convincing .

    • @olliephelan
      @olliephelan 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      FlyingAxblade ill go there then.
      But my channels content is varied .
      Not sure what youd be looking for .
      My brother works building cryostats for universities and institutions around the place , and works one week a month in the IQOQI....but I never knew how to upload the vides he sent me .

  • @liamcraven4936
    @liamcraven4936 7 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    I thought the video had ended 24 seconds in. Great job, it made me laugh more than I should have.

  • @Alive6371
    @Alive6371 ปีที่แล้ว

    I love the way you explained it. Keep up the good work ! ❤️

  • @RichardFoleher
    @RichardFoleher 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    What a great video, thanks. Now I want to build one!

  • @agylub
    @agylub 5 ปีที่แล้ว +61

    Lindybeige. The missing Python

  • @axiezimmah
    @axiezimmah 7 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Wow, I never knew lindy could make a video of only 30 seconds.

  • @Gr8thxAlot
    @Gr8thxAlot 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is like an updated "Secret Life of Machines"! Love it, nice work.

  • @fauseth
    @fauseth 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    You are my most favorite presenter. I dig your style. Thank you for the videos.

  • @Destiny1G
    @Destiny1G 7 ปีที่แล้ว +25

    was really thinking that the video was going to be 40 seconds long.

  • @bigfil1981
    @bigfil1981 5 ปีที่แล้ว +87

    "churches don't tend to move around that much."

    • @hharvey6492
      @hharvey6492 4 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      "traditionally"

  • @snowbullsmovingimages6088
    @snowbullsmovingimages6088 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Informative and entertaining, very nice video that I quite enjoyed. Thank you.

  • @someoneme7057
    @someoneme7057 4 ปีที่แล้ว +27

    Churches don't move around much?
    Someone never been to a black church here in the South.

    • @Perktube1
      @Perktube1 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      True that.

    • @deltoroperdedor3166
      @deltoroperdedor3166 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Ah don geht it

    • @JBGARINGAN
      @JBGARINGAN 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@deltoroperdedor3166 the gospel singers love dancing and putting soul into their prayers

    • @chrisporter9397
      @chrisporter9397 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@deltoroperdedor3166 They're very uppity and rowdy.

  • @WumbologistPhD
    @WumbologistPhD 7 ปีที่แล้ว +151

    I like to think of the suggested Stirling submarine. In a tense moment the captain orders the whole crew to do jumping jacks in order to heat up the inside of the sub even more to get just a bit more speed and escape!

    • @dingchavez09
      @dingchavez09 6 ปีที่แล้ว +23

      The Swedes use a sterling powered submarine! The Gotland Class.
      en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gotland-class_submarine

    • @djdm2603
      @djdm2603 6 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      wasn't there a Finnish sub that used one and beat the US navy in a War Game because it remained undetected because of no radiation signature or signal noise? think i saw a video on it by real engineering...

    • @djdm2603
      @djdm2603 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      rigegs ty

    • @robertgoff6479
      @robertgoff6479 5 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      The Gotland is awesome. It uses two Stirlings that appeared to fit in a 2-meter cube each. They're powered by diesel fuel and compressed oxygen, cooled by seawater, and the diesel exhaust is compressed on board and retained until it can be safely discharged. It was completely invisible to US anti-submarine assets, both active and passive.

    • @axel0_02
      @axel0_02 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@robertgoff6479 I find that very unlikely to be invisible to active sonar... I suggest that the crew found a good place to hide in. I don't know what happened in reality I just think that my version is a bit more possible based on what I know (which is something, on how an active sonar work... but close to nothing on the war game that we are talking about)

  • @AwakenedSaxon
    @AwakenedSaxon 7 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    One good setup would be focusing sunlight onto the top plate while the bottom plate is submerged in some sort of running stream/river.

    • @nikolaspersson1052
      @nikolaspersson1052 7 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      If you have a stream you might as well use a water wheel or hydroelectric generator directly. If you have non-running water though it might be a good heatsink.

    • @Nevir202
      @Nevir202 7 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      I had a similar thought, but for residential use. Focus the sun onto the top and have the bottom plate be the lid of a water tank hooked up to the mains. The water will be somewhat warmed in the process, so if you are in a cold place you can get slightly warmer inlet water to your whole home. But if you're in a hot place where you don't want your "cold" water being any hotter than it already is, just use it to pre-warm the water that is going into your water heater. Either way, whenever you use water coming out of the tank it will slightly boost the efficiency of the unit by replacing some of the warmed water with cooler water.

    • @TheMadJestyr
      @TheMadJestyr 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Or alternately you could use the earth as a heat sink.

  • @itisyarb
    @itisyarb 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is a really entertaining and informative video, fab work!

  • @williambianchi2006
    @williambianchi2006 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    You, Sir, are an excellent teacher. Many thanks.

  • @greyareaRK1
    @greyareaRK1 7 ปีที่แล้ว +26

    You'd think we have stirling engines everywhere here in Canada. So long as the energy produced is greater than the energy lost via heat to the engine. We'll have to install these on our igloos, post haste.

    • @greyareaRK1
      @greyareaRK1 7 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      I could put one on my winter coat.

    • @Papierflugzeug95
      @Papierflugzeug95 7 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      It's not possible to produce more energy than you lose, however you can use the energy that goes to waste otherwise (heat, for example, in a factory).

    • @jeffthecoder
      @jeffthecoder 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      In the future after ww3 you'll be burning your landfills to make electricity using stirling engines

    • @greyareaRK1
      @greyareaRK1 7 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Don't be ridiculous. Burning landfills just attracts the radioactive megachihuahuas.

    • @charleswood4635
      @charleswood4635 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      All the way from Mexico ?

  • @tomasspace4819
    @tomasspace4819 7 ปีที่แล้ว +25

    Most british engine engine ever. YOu can power it by tea and it works better in worse weather. :D

  • @TheAussieincalgary
    @TheAussieincalgary 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Enjoyed this, entertaining and educational, even though I have known about this for years and built one out of a paint can, a milo tin, tomato paste tin, a ballon water pipe joiner a CD and bed roll foam.

  • @jamesart9
    @jamesart9 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Holy crap, that was strangely fascinating.
    Thank you.

  • @NarpytheCrimeDog
    @NarpytheCrimeDog 7 ปีที่แล้ว +32

    So, we could run a massive-ass sterling engine on top of the plutonium and uranium baths to produce energy as well instead of just wasting water?
    Also, do these produce a lot of condensation?

    • @JL-dance
      @JL-dance 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      NarpytheCrimeDog he explains all of this in the video, the stirling uses cold and heat to create motion, so i really don't understand what that has to do with uranium and plutonium baths, a place where people put the used materials from a nuclear power plant so that the radiation doesnt cause everybody in the area to get radiation sickness and long term radiation caused damage (like cancerous cells)

    • @farmerboy916
      @farmerboy916 7 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Issue with that would be that the reactors are designed to use the water baths as safety mechanisms. But yes, and it'd look a hell of a lot nicer than a typical nuclear power plant too. A steampunk monstrosity rather than an ugly concrete one.

    • @JL-dance
      @JL-dance 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      farmerboy916 really? i find nuclear power plant cooling towers to have a certain industrial look to them, if you just imagine that all the water vapor is smoke from heavy machinery

    • @farmerboy916
      @farmerboy916 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      yo boi jonx
      I mean yeah, but they have the downside of having had an aura of fear built up around them. Plus, people tend to like the industrial look in some circumstances but it increases the "not in my backyard" effect.

    • @TheDetonadoBR
      @TheDetonadoBR 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      If you had that you would still need some kind of fluid to make that trade of heat, water or air, you would still to have fluid. And imagine the air going out of that engine, it would be full of water radioactive vapor.

  • @gralha_
    @gralha_ 7 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    Love that transition

  • @ravensmith8614
    @ravensmith8614 หลายเดือนก่อน

    My partner and I enjoy your videos during our breakfast. Our kind of nerd beyond words and she is thankful for your content.

  • @martentrudeau6948
    @martentrudeau6948 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks Lindy, very nice explanation of a brilliant engine!

  • @WILD4X4D
    @WILD4X4D 7 ปีที่แล้ว +761

    Cody sent me here

  • @muhammadschuitema1443
    @muhammadschuitema1443 5 ปีที่แล้ว +149

    It could work at the equator. Plop the bottom in a lake and paint the top black you,d get a heavy temp difference.

    • @northrupthebandgeek
      @northrupthebandgeek 5 ปีที่แล้ว +43

      That'd be a useful way to get these working reasonably-well in a hot desert, too. Dig the "cold end" deep underground (where it's cooler) and fill that underground reservoir with water, and maximize the amount of heat on the hot end.

    • @User_2
      @User_2 5 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      northrupthebandgeek | not really sure about that.. isn’t sand relatively good at insulating? I’d imagine the area below the engine would just heat up and - almost - equalize the temperature after a short while.

    • @northrupthebandgeek
      @northrupthebandgeek 5 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      @@User_2 Right, but then at night it'll get cooler at the surface and equalize the other way.

    • @bilbobaggins7137
      @bilbobaggins7137 4 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      Parabolic mirrors aimed at the plate for the heat, the bottom on a lake? WELL done.

    • @eewweeppkk
      @eewweeppkk 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      At that point you have to ask yourself if the temperature difference between the water and heat from the sun produces more energy for a similarly shaped solar panel. I couldn't tell you the answer, but pointing out that you're trying to use a source of energy that we have already been utilizing.

  • @Hypersim
    @Hypersim ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks to your excellent explanation, I FINALLY understood the theory of a Sterling motor, thank you very much for that!!

  • @circuitdotlt
    @circuitdotlt 4 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    Thank you for interesting video. Micro cogeneration is still in it's infancy, but these things are slowly coming to residential market.
    In my case I am heating my house with natural gas (from pipes, not bottles), which is 3 times cheaper here, compared to electricity. So I started looking in to electricity generation from heat. Found your video.
    All is nice, youtube is full of these demonstration units, however I am still to find a working unit at 10kW or so.

    • @hermitoldguy6312
      @hermitoldguy6312 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      You can convert a car engine to burn gas.

    • @circuitdotlt
      @circuitdotlt 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@hermitoldguy6312 Do some calculations :) New engine will fail in one-two years and will need oil changes every week.

    • @hermitoldguy6312
      @hermitoldguy6312 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@circuitdotlt Nicolaus Otto was making gas engines in the 1860's (hence the Otto cycle).

    • @circuitdotlt
      @circuitdotlt 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@hermitoldguy6312 I run my car on gas, too. But it's not the same as 24/7 operation.

  • @Stettafire
    @Stettafire 6 ปีที่แล้ว +58

    3:30 That same method is used to power my step dad's fan. It works, you see because it's on top of an enclosed fireplace, the bottom is hot, but the air above it is colder, so it powers the fan using the differential. It's useful because then the fan blows hotter air back into the room.

    • @guythepirate
      @guythepirate 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      That is a peltier cell however, a bit different.

    • @_tyrannus
      @_tyrannus 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      guythepirate Absolutely not. Here's an example of what he's talking about: www.stirlingengine.co.uk/d.asp?product=VULCANSTOVEFAN

    • @guythepirate
      @guythepirate 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Aha thought it was one of these
      www.ecofan.co.uk/woodstove-ecofans.html
      Never seen a Stirling version! Thanks

    • @davidross5770
      @davidross5770 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      SO = IN THE DEAD OF WINTER AND THE DEAD OF SUMMER - ONE OF THESE MACHINES PLANTED IN THE GROUND WITH THE HEAT OF THE EARTH IN THE SUMMER COOLING IT AND THE HEAT OF THE SUN WARMING IT WOULD MAKE IT RUN BEST AND DURING THE WINTER WITH THE HEAT OF THE EARTH WARMING IT AND THE COLD OF THE AIR COOLING THE TOP OF IT AGAIN IT WOULD WORK BEST USING THERMAL ENERGY OF THE EARTHS CHANGES COMPARED TO THE OUTSIDE TEMPERATURE.. HMMMM ... this engine would slow down in the spring and fall compared to the winter and summer

  • @geennaam1201
    @geennaam1201 7 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    i'm just imagining that insulating plate to be some guy with a high pitched voice jumping up and down yelling: ahh thats cold, ahh thats hot, ahh thats cold, ahh thats hot

  • @frequentfiler
    @frequentfiler 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    "And it's another first for Britain!" sounded like the Pathe' newsreel announcer.

  • @johnrobert6127
    @johnrobert6127 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Must say I saw these years ago and loved the idea. Powered with heat or cold.
    Brilliant potential

  • @misium
    @misium 7 ปีที่แล้ว +30

    Heat engines as this one are not very efficient. They are limited by thermodynamic limit of efficiency, called the carnot efficiency. Moreover that theoretical maximum efficiency can only be achieved at zero power output.
    The more power you want, the farther away from the carnot efficiency the engine gets.
    Electric engines don't have these problems, because they don't run on expanding gases and temperature differences.

    • @NieroshaiTheSable
      @NieroshaiTheSable 7 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      It's weird that people are suddenly touting this as the technology to solve our energy problems, given those facts. We abandoned this long ago except in novelties for a reason, that reason being we found something more powerful.

    • @ChucksSEADnDEAD
      @ChucksSEADnDEAD 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Nieroshai I don't see it as a way to advance, I see it as a way to achieve small scale subsistence off the grid... or just as a stepping stone if civilization broke down.
      One can make a lathe from scratch with salvaged materials.
      I sure as hell can't build a new solar panel from scratch, but use a parabolic antenna coated in reflective tape to power a Stirling engine made from a bucket of scraps? I could try.

    • @MrMonkeybat
      @MrMonkeybat 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      All engines are heat engines and Sterling are the most efficient at any given temperature variant. But have other drawbacks.

    • @pingwingugu5
      @pingwingugu5 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      +misium
      Stirling engines are low-tech easy to made and easy to maintain solution for renewable energy. To make solar panels you need a high-tech know-how and expensive materials, if you brake a solar panel it is done, you can not fix it.
      As such it might be a good idea to use stirling engine generators in 3rd world countries. For example instead of sending them solar panels we could help them build factories making stirling generators.
      I don't understand why are you mentioning electric engines, the video was about using waste heat for powering things. We are not discussing stirling powered cars, we are discussing how to charge batteries of electric cars with stirling engines.
      The only way that we can generate energy without heat engines right now is using solar panels and wind/water turbines (and maybe peltier cells, which are less efficient that Stirling engines).

    • @migkillerphantom
      @migkillerphantom 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      misium You need to get that electricity first. Which we usually do by making something spin and hooking a generator on it. Something like a heat engine.

  • @RuneChaosMarine
    @RuneChaosMarine 7 ปีที่แล้ว +50

    a sterling silver sterling engine cast in the city of sterling?

    • @lindybeige
      @lindybeige  7 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      You missed one out.

    • @RuneChaosMarine
      @RuneChaosMarine 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Lindybeige
      when will you go to the BRS and see Keith!? and be on the channel Objectivity?

    • @Dreska_
      @Dreska_ 7 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Sterling's sterling Sterling Engine cast from sterling in Sterling

    • @tonyoliver2167
      @tonyoliver2167 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      That it is a stirling, Stirling engine?

    • @fishgun604
      @fishgun604 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      A sterling example of_______

  • @matthew.daniel
    @matthew.daniel 18 วันที่ผ่านมา

    I really enjoyed this, thanks for making it

  • @alexanderwallberg640
    @alexanderwallberg640 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great demonstration and explaination!

  • @MGoudsmits
    @MGoudsmits 5 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    we used sterling engines for cooling the thermal imaging sensor for our tank night vision cameras around 1987. when you drive the engine from outside it will cool down on one side

  • @VYxFrost
    @VYxFrost 7 ปีที่แล้ว +73

    then one day, Sterlingpunk!

    • @bengineer8
      @bengineer8 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      xD

    • @dangerouswitch1066
      @dangerouswitch1066 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Lol

    • @mipmipmipmipmip
      @mipmipmipmipmip 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Lobbying by Big Steam killed off Sterling before it could catch on.

    • @coyoteannabis1192
      @coyoteannabis1192 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I actually wrote a story a few years ago about a goblin city powered by a massive Stirling engine.
      Underground aqueducts passed water over the cold side. The warmed water then flowed through a huge, city with parabolic solar array which brought it up to supercritical temperatures to power the hot side. The flywheel, located beneath the city, was so large the engine could be completely shut down for a week and it would still be spinning enough to generate power.

  • @WJack97224
    @WJack97224 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for the demonstration and education. Good on ya mate.

  • @dominikrutkowski1720
    @dominikrutkowski1720 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Awesome video as always. Thanks

  • @danielpintjuk
    @danielpintjuk 7 ปีที่แล้ว +28

    it is more efficient to use waste heat from servers to power a heat exchange to heat houses.

    • @wierdalien1
      @wierdalien1 7 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Daniil Pintjuk which is happening. though I wouldn't be surprised you wouldn't lose a lot even if you did use them in a server farm so you could both

    • @theondono
      @theondono 7 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Daniil Pintjuk the nice thing of using stirling engines in your server farm is that they naturally provide a feedback system to keep a constant temperature. If you use the engines to power the refrigerators you get a nice trick:
      - if the servers get exceedingly hot, the temperature difference grows and so does the power output of the engine, cooling the servers down again.
      - if they get too cold, the engines slow down, and the temperature goes back up.

    • @wierdalien1
      @wierdalien1 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Xavi Ondoño is getting too cold a problem for a server farm?

    • @jackdaniels4975
      @jackdaniels4975 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      If the server farm is using water to disperse the heat more efficiently, then yes

    • @ShadeOnTheUtube
      @ShadeOnTheUtube 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Could you not potentialy use a PH neutral liquid with much higher boiling and much lower freezing points than water? Not that i know of one atm, but in theory.

  • @JamesK89
    @JamesK89 5 ปีที่แล้ว +122

    You have very distinct character and are so interesting to listen to. That being said you remind me very much of John Cleese.

    • @jonfenrir1018
      @jonfenrir1018 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      I get what you mean :') Less high pitched than Cleese tho

    • @kinshaw3086
      @kinshaw3086 4 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      he reminds me of a highschool history teacher who went through a rough divorce and his wife took everything so now he has to live out of his car, love his vids tho haha

    • @kinshaw3086
      @kinshaw3086 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      ​@Joel Smith how are you not embarrassed to use a joke that lame? no originality whatsoever bro

    • @adamcetinkent
      @adamcetinkent 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Cleese? Surely Chapman?!

    • @dadkinson
      @dadkinson 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@kinshaw3086 that is some imagination you got there :)

  • @govindarajd3248
    @govindarajd3248 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Cody sent me here and now I'm subbed!

  • @AlkalineGamingHD
    @AlkalineGamingHD 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    saw this recommended for weeks and i avoided it because I thught it would be one of those crappy informal videos that just shows off something I already know exists. This was a million times more informative and interesting. Well done

  • @terryendicott2939
    @terryendicott2939 7 ปีที่แล้ว +33

    You do not have to go to Antarctica but look at the geothermal pools in Iceland. Iceland it self can be a bit chilly too.

    • @Grumpy_old_Boot
      @Grumpy_old_Boot 7 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      True, but then, Iceland have some nice geothermal power plants as well. :)

    • @RichyArg
      @RichyArg 7 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      then the question would be, what is more efficient, using stirling engines or the turbine generators most geothermal plants use

    • @terryendicott2939
      @terryendicott2939 7 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      You would have the same question with Antarctica, but Iceland would be closer and less expensive to run test.

    • @Holynub
      @Holynub 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Why not both? Don't geothermal plants also have wasted heat? What if this was attached near the exhaust portion of the plant, and it could capture/use some of that waste to provide even more electricity at only the cost of construction and maintenance. Now, is this cost efficient/economical at a municipal level. But that's something they'd have to investigate if they were to implement these.

    • @nonfunctionalslackfill
      @nonfunctionalslackfill 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Terry Endicott yes but the also have letters like þ and đ.

  • @koneal2000
    @koneal2000 7 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    That's one long closing card.

  • @philipdemaeyer1665
    @philipdemaeyer1665 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Brilliant! Good explanation, thank you Sir Lindybeige.

  • @Pizzagulper
    @Pizzagulper ปีที่แล้ว

    I love the ideas mentioned here. One thing That I would like to add about it not working well in hot climates, is you may be able to undo that problem a bit, by having water running over the top plate via aqueduct, or just building it on a bank to a water source. It would be most useful, in a wilderness domestic sort of setting.
    Also thanks for the great description of how it works. I looked up how they work, and people kept giving conflicting and confusing answers. Most of their answers didn't seem like they would work, so it's nice to finally find one that makes logical sense.