ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 31 พ.ค. 2024
- Available at ProAV: bit.ly/47lwQRu
Nathaniel compares three of our best selling wireless video systems in the £500 to £700 price range. The Hollyland Mars 4K, Accsoon CineView SE & SWIT Curve 500+
Chapters:
00:00 Intro
00:33 Price
00:45 Resolution
01:02 Power
01:14 Weight
01:24 Inputs / Outputs
01:33 Transmission
02:17 Latency
05:20 Image Quality
06:24 Range
08:09 Physical Design
09:45 Expanded Monitoring
12:06 Conclusion
ProAV Website: www.proav.co.uk/
Follow us on Twitter: / proav
Follow us on Facebook: / proav.co.uk
Follow us on Instagram: / proavuk
Follow us on LinkedIn: / 5107702 - ภาพยนตร์และแอนิเมชัน
This was by far the best video on these transmitters. Well done and thanks!
what a great comparison! I really appreciate the detailed review of these!
Great detailed review. Latency test was a+
Fantastic video!!! THANK YOU!
This is what I’ve been waiting on. ❤
really useful comparison! thanks team Proav!
Thanks for watching!
Thanks for the review
Awesome comparison! would have been great to also show the latency of other frame rates and resolution.
Glad it was useful! Thanks for watching
We’ve been using the Swit Flow 500 and the performance is outstanding in terms of stability and reliability, some times we noticed the banding compression but just a couple of times.
Fantastic, that’s great to hear
Is there a way for me to get two transmitters (one for each camera) and send them to a phone or tablet via an app? Which products support that of any? I need to monitor both cameras simultaneously or at least be able to switch on a handheld wireless monitor (phone/tablet)
Thank you
good test !
Thanks for watching!
I want to monitor to be a focusist! So do you recommend the SWIT Curve 500+?
Can the Accsoon also output the video signal to a computer to use it as a webcam or with OBS as well?
I’m sorry my English in advance. If I understood right, the Hollyland 4K transmits a better image quality. In my case I need it just for photo shootings and not video. So the Hollyland 4K should be the right one in this comparation?thanks
I have the Accsoon Cineye and love it, only thing I cannot figure out is when I have the signal sent out from my camera or monitor to an external LCD monitor for some reason the LUT profile never comes through and the image looks flat like the Slog I am shooting in, Anybody know what I might be doing wrong? The LCD monitor is a portable monitor but has no LUT's in it... Thanks in advance...
Your camera cannot output the LUT through HDMI or you need to turn Cine EI mode on
Something needs to be applying a LUT to the HDMI signal. Some cameras can, some cameras only apply a LUT to the on camera monitor but not HDMI so the monitor would need to add one.
Great video. I have the Hollyland Cosmo C1 (1080P60) and it's been really great. Its latency seems really low (not noticeable to me - I use it for focus pulling). Would have been neat to see how it compares in this test. I imagine it's similar to the Mars 4K in transmission as it's rated at 1000ft (304M).
Thanks for making this video! Great job!
Glad it was useful. I hear you, but sadly we can’t compare everything! Glad it’s working well for you though.
Thanks a lot ! Finally someone do a real comparison, with real delay results, and not just “bah… it has some delay”.
I think this kind of transmission will not be enough for focus in a really moving situation, but to make some focus adjustments, or some smooth and slow tracking it make the job. But I’ll definitely not ask to my AC to pull focus on a 85mm at 1.8 with it (or I’ll accept that he will put his focus wheel deep inside my… oups)
Amazing review. Thanks a lot. Mars 4K for me, despite all of them doing great overall.