The Investment Insights of Charles Ellis, a Financial Legend for 60 Years

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 5 ก.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 45

  • @benscott4505
    @benscott4505 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Consuelo, you are to be commended for showcasing this man’s wisdom! This interview was just a homerun!

  • @iamkerenlouise
    @iamkerenlouise ปีที่แล้ว +11

    This man is a sage and wise investment powerhouse and legacy - I will read his book!❤ thank you for having him! He is still very sharp as a tack at 85! Wonderful!

    • @Jacobkeirnnfsk
      @Jacobkeirnnfsk ปีที่แล้ว +2

      His previous books are terrific as well.

  • @mikesmith-nj1ij
    @mikesmith-nj1ij ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Winning the Losers Game. A. Charles Ellis classic! Looking forward to this interview.

  • @wholeNwon
    @wholeNwon ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I recommend his and John Bogle's books to new investors.

  • @RWROW
    @RWROW ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Thanks for this interview with Mr. Ellis. His advice is invaluable for any ordinary investor.

  • @anandpatel2624
    @anandpatel2624 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    “Knowing thy self” what an amazing thought and absolutely well explained. Love the down to earth explanation. That mother’s return of investment was the children being this successful to be interviewed!!! ❤👏👍

  • @SY-jq4yw
    @SY-jq4yw ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Thanks for Charles’ wisdom.

  • @bernhardklinger4839
    @bernhardklinger4839 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great Interview! Charles Ellis is phenomenally intelligent and eloquent!

  • @brianhollenbeck8633
    @brianhollenbeck8633 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Having responsible parents that prepare for their children's future is a blessing. Not that I would know.😇👑🌍🌏🌎💚

  • @awalton9024
    @awalton9024 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Ellis says: "90% fail to keep up with the market)..etc. Simply put, if you take the other side of that bet you have a 90% chance of exceeding the market. An understanding of probability was my takeaway from business school and it has stood me in good stead. Ellis is always worth listening to but you have to listen very carefully to really aprehend what he's actually saying.

  • @mikejohnson4617
    @mikejohnson4617 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    "All of us have Bloomberg terminals"??? I had to look up what it was. Sounds like the starting point is $20k per year. Not at my house.

  • @mikkimikki5376
    @mikkimikki5376 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    So very interesting. Appreciate this kind of history lesson. ✨💫✨

    • @jessyjames7508
      @jessyjames7508 ปีที่แล้ว

      LOVE how Mr. Ellis thinks about investing, especially at his age. Zero bond position--that's truly investing and very contrary to to conventional portfolio thinking.

  • @supersteve8305
    @supersteve8305 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    My first investment in 1988, I had to call a trader and pay a $75.00 commission on a $250.00 investment. Now I could make a $250.00 (or whatever) trade, and pay nothing. Things have come a long way.

    • @michaelfelli7661
      @michaelfelli7661 ปีที่แล้ว

      Then, it was called investing. Today, its called speculating.

    • @jakejake7289
      @jakejake7289 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I remember those days. It used to kill me to pay those commissions to Shearson Lehman. I didn't have much money.

    • @craigwroten190
      @craigwroten190 ปีที่แล้ว

      They would have you believe that it costs nothing

  • @ednan9
    @ednan9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Another great show by Consuelo- Thx

  • @youtubebystander9294
    @youtubebystander9294 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    So much ideas and insights to ponder on and act on. Thank you guys ❤

  • @nkunam
    @nkunam ปีที่แล้ว +6

    9:22 Charles Darwyn would be fascinated by the amount of greedy and incompetent people still employed by the financial industry and investment management industry in particular. 90% of investment managers are serial underperformers and yet 99% of the managers get to keep their jobs. The entire hierarchy is driven by negative selection, and to quote Ron Desantis "There are so many worn-out greedy idiots (donkeys are lovely animals, and so I don't want to say donkeys and insult the donkeys) that need to be put out to pasture"

    • @yoshortyb
      @yoshortyb ปีที่แล้ว

      It is pretty incredible how many people work in investment management earning 7 figures doing absolutely nothing of value. How is it possible they can still get assets?

  • @billbonczek7238
    @billbonczek7238 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    It would have been interesting if Charles Ellis had calculated the investment return if his mother had invested his college money in the S&P 90 (the stock market index in place before the S&P 500 came into existence in 1957) compared to the 0 percent return on the money placed in the bank checking account.

  • @johnmerlino7011
    @johnmerlino7011 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    In the last two years, the Federal Reserve has manipulated stock and bond markets so that 'price discovery' is not real any longer. Factors that now effectively effect the stock and bond markets include: 1. Fundamentals, 2. Technicals, 3. Mechanics (Options - call/puts), 4. The Fed purchases of bonds (daily), and FX (DXY) valuation of the USD. All our education really is getting less meaningful when markets are manipulated in this manner. I don't believe we have 'free markets' any longer. Also, we probably are going into long term stagflation where GDP continues to decline. In that environment you can't just assume stock markets will go up.

  • @mtaqavi1408
    @mtaqavi1408 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you for this really informative video!

  • @YouBillyW
    @YouBillyW ปีที่แล้ว

    Great channel - great show

  • @marcb934
    @marcb934 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great guy! Thx.

  • @merchantsailor
    @merchantsailor ปีที่แล้ว

    A bubble in the financial services sectors, are they squeezing out the companies that do provide a service , make a product, and not just shuffle assets.

  • @kpduffy
    @kpduffy ปีที่แล้ว +1

    "The market is competitive, rational and efficient." Ok, explain 2021 when everyone lost their minds.
    There are plenty of ways to gain edges in the highly competitive investment game. For starters, avoid crowds, simple narratives and bubbles. Next, go fishing in the anti-bubbles. E.g., in the late '90s, New Economy stocks were in a bubble, while Old Economy stocks were abandoned and dirt cheap. During the late '80s, "Japan's rise" was the conventional wisdom, with "America's decline" its mirror image. This is a simple formula... but not easy.

  • @thomasotoole3212
    @thomasotoole3212 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    For the average retail investor, this was a useless interview.. Yes, Treasures for now, and transition to equities as the Fed pivots.. Nothing new here..

  • @aman101112
    @aman101112 ปีที่แล้ว

    Charles Ellis is a wise sage of investing but his views do not reconcile with the actual data. The last year should be a good example of how far valuations had gotten from reality. In an efficient market this shouldn't have happened.
    Markets will never be efficient. But for an average investor who is not willing to do the work, the views expressed are actually correct and very relevant.

    • @chetmohr8396
      @chetmohr8396 ปีที่แล้ว

      The last year evaluations didn’t get that crazy…and now P/E’s are in the mid-low teens

    • @chetmohr8396
      @chetmohr8396 ปีที่แล้ว

      Valuations can go high in an efficient market. How does that disprove it?
      Also, no one can beat the market long term, even the investor who spends 24/7 researching and studying.

    • @aman101112
      @aman101112 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@chetmohr8396 How do you justify prices of some of the SPACs based on market efficiency?
      Efficiency means all information is reflected in the price. What information existed last year that made SPACs 100x more valuable than they are today?

    • @chetmohr8396
      @chetmohr8396 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@aman101112 you’re asking what has changed since last year? Inflation, interest rates, earnings, elections, supply chain issues, the War in Ukraine - many things have happened since last year.

  • @mourad_weider
    @mourad_weider ปีที่แล้ว

    an investment wisdom

  • @rof8200
    @rof8200 ปีที่แล้ว

    When the USD debases, those treasury bills are going to be surprising.

  • @mossdale4591
    @mossdale4591 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I may be doing this gentleman a disservice, but I have stopped listening at 6:36, upon hearing his categorical support for the efficient market theory--which is surely one of the stupidest postulates ever held to by numbers of people of high I.Q.

  • @yoshortyb
    @yoshortyb ปีที่แล้ว +2

    This guy is always a broken record. I am a huge advocate for index investing, but it isn't the only game in town. Charlie never really sounds competent when he can really only speak to the failures of active managers and sounds inept whenever any other topic is brought up.

  • @qake2021
    @qake2021 ปีที่แล้ว

    👏👏👏😁👍👍👍👏👏👏

  • @conduit242
    @conduit242 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    So…59 years 😂

  • @Garce227
    @Garce227 ปีที่แล้ว

    CFA is no mean task!

  • @ApplesOranges123
    @ApplesOranges123 ปีที่แล้ว

    Just because the data is available 'does not mean it's being used, I can guarantee this gentleman is not using information sources used by Millenials. So he is espousing giving up.

  • @mrcmid9132
    @mrcmid9132 ปีที่แล้ว

    Manipulation......lol

  • @jayadsilva67
    @jayadsilva67 ปีที่แล้ว

    All those flashy accolades. But has he made any money. I bet he is all talk and nothing.