The AG only sifted through 50% of SDTC contracts at random. Of that randomly selected 50% over 80% had conflicts of interest. Presumably the same amount of conflicts of interest would be found in the other 50% of the SDTC contracts. This would approach 800 million inappropriately placed funds! In my opinion, unaccountability is our governments largest problem and the RCMP has the unfortunate history of letting these things slide (failure to ask for SNC warrant, Nova scotia shooting ect). The move may be unprecedented and partisan, but it is better than the alternative of letting yet another scandal go unpunished and perhaps prompted the RCMP to do something (via the normal way). What Minister Gould is talking about this being the first step leading to a police state is beyond hyperbole.
And the conversation ends on how happy Gould is that everyone she could see around her is on the government dole, somehow this raises "equality" in Canada. *Sigh* my generation is in so much trouble.
@@stratford374 tent cities didn’t exist, most people had a doctor, parks weren’t littered with needles and drugs, food banks weren’t empty, people were generally far happier, families weren’t torn apart over vaccine mandates, soldiers were given ammo instead of tampons, yeah- the facts aren’t wrong. The only people who still support these current goofs is unemployed freeloaders.
Yes. Now We have much more higher numbers in people going to food bank . We din’t have 2 million people going to food bank during Harper years. We didn’t have nearly 10000 homeless camps in Canada during Harper years. Those kind of “ improved numbers” keep going up and up. After next election this minister deserved to be on permanent retirement with many of her liberal colleagues in the cabinet and the caucus. Hopefully their retirement date would come soon.
I really like David. I watch most of his content even though I would consider myself a conservative. But boy oh boy, I can’t wait for Trudeau and Karina to be off of the airwaves. Thank goodness, Pierre will hopefully be the next Prime Minister. I’ve been wishing for years that we had Harper back. And I am guilty of voting for Trudeau 2015. But then I grew up.
Oh my god, take the L on the gun issue. I don't shoot semi autos, I don't want handguns but the way target shooters and hunters have been treated under this Liberal government has been abysmal. We follow the laws, we fund the majority of conservation efforts and yet we are treated as an enemy within. I otherwise quite like Gould and felt bad for her getting rolled on election reform but this one part struck me badly.
I typically enjoy the dynamic nature of your podcasts, and offering of different viewpoints. This week is definitely a miss- Karina Gould is one the worst of the woke, whiny, entitled , elitist Liberal party.
“Canada will be I unrecognizable if Pierre is elected”…..Karina the irony is the reason he is going to be elected is because of your government this country is no longer recognizable from what it was prior to Trudeau’s time as prime minister…..IT IS COMPLETELY UNRECOGNIZABLE!!! People don’t like what this country has become. I little just met people from Brazil that have lived here for a while and they said “we are moving back to Brazil because Canada has lost what Canada used to be”. I hope they campaign on climate change and DEI so they can be up in last place.
David I am a loyal never miss the curse of politics. Why is it you do not have conservatives on the Herle Berle ? Soft ball questions to Ms Gould shows your biased so much.
Because the CPC doesn't let their MPs do interviews. This dates back to the Harper days and they've always put very, very tight controls on their MPs media appearances.
David, i am a loyal fan of the show, and in general, find you fairly impartial given your long Liberal pedigree. I must say, however, that i am disappointed with your lack of pushback against Ms. Gould's many unfounded accusations against Pierre. For example, "How, specifically, is Poilievre more 'extreme' than Harper?". Or, " you say he'll slash all these programs upon which Canadians depend. What is your evidence, from his record or his statements, that would justify such a drastic statement"? Unfortunately, Ms.Gould simply rehashed the same unsubstantiated allegations that Trudeau makes. Also, she criticized Pierre's response that he will give women a right to choose to buy a house wgen Trudeau asked him if he was pro-choice. Sure, Pierre's answer wasn't in response to abortion, but Trudeau's question about abortion was completely irrelevant to Pierre's previous question put to him. That kind of blatant hypocrisy by Gould should've been called out. Also, you correctly challenged her on the carbon tax, but not on the preachy wokeness of her government which has alienated a lot of voters.
@@terryomalley1974 Poilievre refuses to respond when, on the rare occasion he actually takes questions, he is asked what he would cut. So you asking someone to point to a statement about where he's specific is kind of impossible because he doesn't take questions and won't say what he would do. He's planning for austerity and we won't know what his plans are until he becomes PM. Because once people see what he'll cut he's going to have problems. Is he going to raise the retirement age, like Harper did, to cut back on old age benefits? Is he going to gut pharma and dental care? Daycare? That being said I agree with you that it would've been nice to see a little more push backs from Herle, but I also don't expect him to be a hard hitting journalist. Great guy, but he's no Vassy. The abortion question is a tried and true Liberal line that's unsurprising for them to bring out. Poilievre says he's pro choice, and I believe him, but there is a not insignificant percentage of his party that is anti-abortion. Now I would love criticize Trudeau because if he's so worried about it they could also pass legislation to protect that right, since we're in a similar state as the USA in that abortion isn't codified. So, I think it's a criticism that falls flat because in the truest Liberal fashion, they're outraged nothing is being done while they're the ones in power. As a quick point of comparison for Poilievre and Harper. I would somewhat agree with Poilievre being more extreme in terms of who he panders too. I was not a fan of Harper but he was a brilliant politician and he would not have entertained the Convoy crowd or dog whistled to conspiracy theories to the WEF. And I honestly think that's not a good move, longterm. I think he played it up to win the leadership and to get back the support they lost to the PPC and it'll come back to bite him if he doesn't catered to them like Danielle Smith does. I don't think Poilievre is some kind of extremist or threat to our country but I think he's playing with fire by entertaining some of the more extreme elements. Though, either way, we can fully expect the Liberals to frame him as such. They did the same with O'Toole and he's pretty milquetoast.
@stratford374 Very good analysis. The truth of the matter, however, is that the Liberals are just putting words in Pierre's mouth because he hasn't said what he'll cut, and he's under no obligation to until the writ is dropped. Just like they do during QP, the Libs mistakenly think that the leader of the opposition is the one who has to answer questions rather than the government. I hear you about Herle and agree that he's a good guy, but I still think he could have held her feet to the fire because Gould was playing very fast & loose with the facts.
Hi David, really enjoy the show. But not this week. Having to listen to this individual in Question Period is enough torture. But to have her on your show, burns to the core. JT, Freeland, Gould, please no. We're all tuned out now. What were you thinking?
Not to ascribe motive to David, but I would say that he, a die hard Liberal partisan, is thinking he wanted to have a conversation with the government House leader of the Liberal party. All the folks clutching their pearls in the comment section because he didn't spend an hour dunking on her and holding her feet to the fire are just addicted to rage bait. Herle's not a journalist.
This interview screams of putting Party over your listeners. I'm really disappointed in this interview. It's the worst you've ever done. Hopefully this will be the bottom.
The new daycare system is only accessible to those who have the right contacts. The Quebec model was not one to emulate, and that is what this government did.
She would like to see the Liberals in power until fall of 2025? The vast majority of Canadians don’t want to see that happen. Prime example of how they put their interests in front of the country. Period. Thank you for confirming what we already knew.
... the woke lefties will vote for her in droves ... she's almost as pretty as JT ... I find her condescending, patronizing manner insulting .... but that's just me
I had to fast forward through most of this interview ... only seen a couple of your podcasts but what I see is pretty one-sided ... letting her slide on many of her assertions of what Pierre has or has not actually said is either lazy or assisting.
Great interview. I agree that our history books were so selective. Trailblazer, indeed. Congratulations, Rt. Hon. MP and Leader of the Government, Karina Gould.
The AG only sifted through 50% of SDTC contracts at random. Of that randomly selected 50% over 80% had conflicts of interest. Presumably the same amount of conflicts of interest would be found in the other 50% of the SDTC contracts. This would approach 800 million inappropriately placed funds! In my opinion, unaccountability is our governments largest problem and the RCMP has the unfortunate history of letting these things slide (failure to ask for SNC warrant, Nova scotia shooting ect). The move may be unprecedented and partisan, but it is better than the alternative of letting yet another scandal go unpunished and perhaps prompted the RCMP to do something (via the normal way). What Minister Gould is talking about this being the first step leading to a police state is beyond hyperbole.
It takes a special kind of person to be able to lie to your face with a smile.
And the conversation ends on how happy Gould is that everyone she could see around her is on the government dole, somehow this raises "equality" in Canada. *Sigh* my generation is in so much trouble.
No Minister Gould. Everything was better when Mr. Harper was PM.
No it wasn't. But I know that won't stop you from being nostalgic for an imaginary time!
@@stratford374 tent cities didn’t exist, most people had a doctor, parks weren’t littered with needles and drugs, food banks weren’t empty, people were generally far happier, families weren’t torn apart over vaccine mandates, soldiers were given ammo instead of tampons, yeah- the facts aren’t wrong. The only people who still support these current goofs is unemployed freeloaders.
Yes. Now We have much more higher numbers in people going to food bank . We din’t have 2 million people going to food bank during Harper years. We didn’t have nearly 10000 homeless camps in Canada during Harper years. Those kind of “ improved numbers” keep going up and up. After next election this minister deserved to be on permanent retirement with many of her liberal colleagues in the cabinet and the caucus. Hopefully their retirement date would come soon.
I almost always watch the Hurley Burly , but not this time. Gould is low octane . I just cant take her grin.
Ah.. a woman smiling upsets you. Got it.
@@stratford374 Gould smiles like Kamilla laughs.
@@mikenicol8618 *Kamala
So not only does a women smiling upset you, but laughing as well?
Fragile af.
@@stratford374 It is not my fault that these two politicians happen to be women, but you seem to have a problem with it.
@@mikenicol8618 Hah. I'm not the one upset by someone smiling. But you do you boo.
I really like David. I watch most of his content even though I would consider myself a conservative. But boy oh boy, I can’t wait for Trudeau and Karina to be off of the airwaves. Thank goodness, Pierre will hopefully be the next Prime Minister. I’ve been wishing for years that we had Harper back. And I am guilty of voting for Trudeau 2015. But then I grew up.
Oh my god, take the L on the gun issue. I don't shoot semi autos, I don't want handguns but the way target shooters and hunters have been treated under this Liberal government has been abysmal. We follow the laws, we fund the majority of conservation efforts and yet we are treated as an enemy within. I otherwise quite like Gould and felt bad for her getting rolled on election reform but this one part struck me badly.
One of the worst sycophants in the government.
Please let this not be a puff-softball interview. Please let this not be a puff-softball interview. Please let this not be a puff-softball interview.
Too bad.
Can’t do it!!!
I typically enjoy the dynamic nature of your podcasts, and offering of different viewpoints. This week is definitely a miss- Karina Gould is one the worst of the woke, whiny, entitled , elitist Liberal party.
“Canada will be I unrecognizable if Pierre is elected”…..Karina the irony is the reason he is going to be elected is because of your government this country is no longer recognizable from what it was prior to Trudeau’s time as prime minister…..IT IS COMPLETELY UNRECOGNIZABLE!!! People don’t like what this country has become. I little just met people from Brazil that have lived here for a while and they said “we are moving back to Brazil because Canada has lost what Canada used to be”. I hope they campaign on climate change and DEI so they can be up in last place.
Too much puff. I'm skipping this episode.
David I am a loyal never miss the curse of politics. Why is it you do not have conservatives on the Herle Berle ? Soft ball questions to Ms Gould shows your biased so much.
He is and was a Liberal after all
Because the CPC doesn't let their MPs do interviews. This dates back to the Harper days and they've always put very, very tight controls on their MPs media appearances.
@@stratford374 well the lady from Calgary was on the show...Rempel. So that's not completely true
@@stratford374Not true. I have seen lots of conservative MP's interviewed. Northern Perspective has done 2, Jordan Peterson has done a few......
@@kqh123 You're right, my apologies. She's been one more than once... Anyone else though?
Sorry, hard pass this week.
David, i am a loyal fan of the show, and in general, find you fairly impartial given your long Liberal pedigree. I must say, however, that i am disappointed with your lack of pushback against Ms. Gould's many unfounded accusations against Pierre. For example, "How, specifically, is Poilievre more 'extreme' than Harper?". Or, " you say he'll slash all these programs upon which Canadians depend. What is your evidence, from his record or his statements, that would justify such a drastic statement"? Unfortunately, Ms.Gould simply rehashed the same unsubstantiated allegations that Trudeau makes.
Also, she criticized Pierre's response that he will give women a right to choose to buy a house wgen Trudeau asked him if he was pro-choice. Sure, Pierre's answer wasn't in response to abortion, but Trudeau's question about abortion was completely irrelevant to Pierre's previous question put to him. That kind of blatant hypocrisy by Gould should've been called out. Also, you correctly challenged her on the carbon tax, but not on the preachy wokeness of her government which has alienated a lot of voters.
@@terryomalley1974 Poilievre refuses to respond when, on the rare occasion he actually takes questions, he is asked what he would cut. So you asking someone to point to a statement about where he's specific is kind of impossible because he doesn't take questions and won't say what he would do.
He's planning for austerity and we won't know what his plans are until he becomes PM. Because once people see what he'll cut he's going to have problems. Is he going to raise the retirement age, like Harper did, to cut back on old age benefits? Is he going to gut pharma and dental care? Daycare?
That being said I agree with you that it would've been nice to see a little more push backs from Herle, but I also don't expect him to be a hard hitting journalist. Great guy, but he's no Vassy.
The abortion question is a tried and true Liberal line that's unsurprising for them to bring out. Poilievre says he's pro choice, and I believe him, but there is a not insignificant percentage of his party that is anti-abortion. Now I would love criticize Trudeau because if he's so worried about it they could also pass legislation to protect that right, since we're in a similar state as the USA in that abortion isn't codified. So, I think it's a criticism that falls flat because in the truest Liberal fashion, they're outraged nothing is being done while they're the ones in power.
As a quick point of comparison for Poilievre and Harper. I would somewhat agree with Poilievre being more extreme in terms of who he panders too. I was not a fan of Harper but he was a brilliant politician and he would not have entertained the Convoy crowd or dog whistled to conspiracy theories to the WEF. And I honestly think that's not a good move, longterm. I think he played it up to win the leadership and to get back the support they lost to the PPC and it'll come back to bite him if he doesn't catered to them like Danielle Smith does.
I don't think Poilievre is some kind of extremist or threat to our country but I think he's playing with fire by entertaining some of the more extreme elements. Though, either way, we can fully expect the Liberals to frame him as such. They did the same with O'Toole and he's pretty milquetoast.
@stratford374 Very good analysis. The truth of the matter, however, is that the Liberals are just putting words in Pierre's mouth because he hasn't said what he'll cut, and he's under no obligation to until the writ is dropped. Just like they do during QP, the Libs mistakenly think that the leader of the opposition is the one who has to answer questions rather than the government. I hear you about Herle and agree that he's a good guy, but I still think he could have held her feet to the fire because Gould was playing very fast & loose with the facts.
@@stratford374 The gravy train HAS TO END ... you KNOW this.
Hi David, really enjoy the show. But not this week. Having to listen to this individual in Question Period is enough torture. But to have her on your show, burns to the core. JT, Freeland, Gould, please no. We're all tuned out now. What were you thinking?
Not to ascribe motive to David, but I would say that he, a die hard Liberal partisan, is thinking he wanted to have a conversation with the government House leader of the Liberal party.
All the folks clutching their pearls in the comment section because he didn't spend an hour dunking on her and holding her feet to the fire are just addicted to rage bait. Herle's not a journalist.
Oh man.... Just starting but how much is she going to talk about PPs clearance?
She can’t stop with her TruAnon talking points.
Soft ball garbage
what...the first minister to give birth while in office. Well that sure is important. Cause that makes all her lies ok right? (face palm)
This interview screams of putting Party over your listeners. I'm really disappointed in this interview. It's the worst you've ever done. Hopefully this will be the bottom.
One of the worst examples of mp’s Canada has to offer
😂😂😂😂😂 and 😂😂😂😂😂 and 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Horrible, woke guest. She must be drinking the woke liberal kool-aid every day. Couldn’t watch past 15 minutes.
No
Kind of strange she doesnt mention coming out of the global young leaders program.
Childcare isn’t affordable though. You’re just mortgaging childcare services and making our children pay for it.
The new daycare system is only accessible to those who have the right contacts.
The Quebec model was not one to emulate, and that is what this government did.
@ Could be. We got into our daycare. I know it’s just going to have to be paid for by someone else later though.
Really?
She would like to see the Liberals in power until fall of 2025? The vast majority of Canadians don’t want to see that happen. Prime example of how they put their interests in front of the country. Period. Thank you for confirming what we already knew.
I really wish she would stop giving a wink to conspiracy theorists.
TruAnon is toxic and disingenuous, and she is auditioning to be their president.
If you wanted to hear Karina Goulds thoughts you could of flushed a toilet, would have saved you a hour of absolutely nothing
👎
Sorry Dave. Why too much propaganda on this show. Really showing your hand.
... the woke lefties will vote for her in droves ... she's almost as pretty as JT ... I find her condescending, patronizing manner insulting .... but that's just me
Hello dear mem
I had to fast forward through most of this interview ... only seen a couple of your podcasts but what I see is pretty one-sided ... letting her slide on many of her assertions of what Pierre has or has not actually said is either lazy or assisting.
If you knew how hooked we are on HB and COP, you'd charge us real money
Great interview. I agree that our history books were so selective. Trailblazer, indeed. Congratulations, Rt. Hon. MP and Leader of the Government, Karina Gould.
don't need to listen to this interview - it will all be BS
Karina Gould has always done a good job at whatever portfolio she was given. Capable
Lmao you should start a stand up career
What portfolio is that? The Ministry of Lies and Gaslighting?