I won $30 million at trial, but the Judge knocked it down to $3 mil! What gives?!

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 25 ส.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 30

  • @Mystoryisntoverjustyet
    @Mystoryisntoverjustyet หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    If it goes to appeal, could they even knock it down more from 3 mill ?

  • @dizzigmc5448
    @dizzigmc5448 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    I would’ve been beyond pissed

  • @MarioPonce-fx4zs
    @MarioPonce-fx4zs หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    the is just why the system wrong! then why have a jury!

  • @isaacstrade9358
    @isaacstrade9358 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Haha got me cracking up over hear. So basically keep it reasonable

  • @darlynegoo4251
    @darlynegoo4251 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Go in before sunrise, no lunch and leave early? Bring fans and Portable RV fridge. Work remote at home with AC. Hope you are comfortable somehow. Blessings on your helpful channel!

  • @ladyoftheflowers9781
    @ladyoftheflowers9781 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    As a mathematical person, I would love to see how attorneys calculate both pecuinary and non-pecuniary damages. Do you all use a spreadsheet or some kind of software, or other tool?

  • @EdisonFlow510
    @EdisonFlow510 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    This video was very informative and as usual had me laughing out loud LOL either you were prior military or you do comedy on the side🤣🤣

    • @ProSePlaintiff
      @ProSePlaintiff หลายเดือนก่อน

      Maybe Mr. White is a clown? 😮

    • @JobAttorney
      @JobAttorney  หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I tried to be Air Force JAG, they didn't want me

    • @ProSePlaintiff
      @ProSePlaintiff หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@JobAttorney Were you too crazy to be accepted in the JAG air force?

    • @EdisonFlow510
      @EdisonFlow510 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@JobAttorney now that's noteworthy, regardless to whether they were smart enough to take you or not. No bs. Most of the time it's either special warfare or the Navy seals that people try to get into. You trying to go Jag in the Air Force (at one point) is the same as going in the Navy to be a Nuke, THEE most highly respected jobs in the military. Respect💪🏾🙏🏾💯

  • @Tiffany-mason
    @Tiffany-mason หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    I’m in the middle of a EEO now and my case has been selected for early mediation. Now I don’t think I’m going to get $30M let alone $3M. My company legal department has placed me on a “legal hold” and asked to meet with me. Would I be considered “difficult” if I declined.

    • @EdisonFlow510
      @EdisonFlow510 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Yes and no. You know your case better than anyone so it depends. The early mediation may be the company's attempt to find a resolution that will benefit all parties involved in regards to the details within your case, or they may be trying to settle the case depending on if you or your attorney (if you've hired one) has submitted a demand letter or filed a lawsuit.

    • @mikeashley9578
      @mikeashley9578 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Even if you are, screw them. They have the upper advantage with at-will employment and they exploit it, so why shouldn't you exploit a situation over them when you can?

  • @Ooohmy
    @Ooohmy หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Vince, I got my RTS, and my attorney said he's writing up a proposal for the 4 partners, and they have to take a vote. I'm nervous. Should I be looking for another lawyer? It's been 30 days, and I've heard nothing yet.

    • @MyOtherChannel-zy3tf
      @MyOtherChannel-zy3tf หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Are they voting on representing you and filing your case in court?

    • @Ooohmy
      @Ooohmy หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @MyOtherChannel-zy3tf yes, they've already been representing me and I signed a Retainer Agreement, but in the fine print, the firm reserves the right to decide to represent the case in court. Now I'm worried that they may drop my case.

    • @MyOtherChannel-zy3tf
      @MyOtherChannel-zy3tf หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ​@Ooohmy , have you paid them thusfar? Filing and funding a case can get expensive, say $30,000 -$50,000. They may ask you to fund some of this expense upfront. In all actuality you pay all expenses if you win anyways. They may want you to have a risk as well as them.

    • @traemorris394
      @traemorris394 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@MyOtherChannel-zy3tfI would have the Plan B ready

    • @Ooohmy
      @Ooohmy หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @MyOtherChannel-zy3tf I haven't put anything down, and the retainer agreement said I'd have to pay $2K for filing expenses. But so far, they've went to my EEOC meeting and wrote a rebuttal for me and a few calls back/forth. Otherwise, I'm waiting to hear from them and whether the 4 partners agree to taking my case any further is where I am. Makes me nervous.. because I have less than 90 days at this point

  • @MarioPonce-fx4zs
    @MarioPonce-fx4zs หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The attorney can appeal this decision.

  • @aubreynaarcher8916
    @aubreynaarcher8916 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    So, can you explain the formula? I would actually be rational with applying it. Assume we're reasonable.

    • @JobAttorney
      @JobAttorney  หลายเดือนก่อน

      Absolutely, we have a whole playlist of videos on this channel discussing how to calculate damages. It's all there, hours of content.

  • @Gokywildcats11
    @Gokywildcats11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    What does prehearing/ start time denied mean

  • @carolmosher7745
    @carolmosher7745 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Vince you can argue "the formulae" is not based on Federal anti discrimination law. Yes there is a cap of $300,000 under the 1964 Civil Rights Act. But no "formulae" is written by Congress. And there are no caps under section 1981 of the 1866 Civil Rights act. So if a Jury awards 30 million in damages to a complaining party under these statutes then they should get their money!

  • @viralsheddingzombie5324
    @viralsheddingzombie5324 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Plaintiff (employee) gets a legal jury award of 30 million. The plaintiff won. Why is the defendant not required to file an appeal at this point? Why is the burden shifted to the plaintiff when the plaintiff prevailed?

    • @MyOtherChannel-zy3tf
      @MyOtherChannel-zy3tf หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Looks like the judge lowered the award because it was excessive and not actual loss. If this amount was a punitive award, say for retaliation, the judge may not have touched it because the jury has spoken.