I see your from Utah; I literally just moved out here 2 months ago from the Midwest. Is there any good public ranges I can draw from holster and do weapon transitions that you can recommend?
Supersonic .300 AAC Blackout 110 to 147 grain bullets work fine in 5.56 x 45 magazines in my experience. I love AR-15 rifles chambered in .300 Blackout, 7.62 x 39 and 6.5 x 39 Grendel.
I've used 200gr 300BLK in my Magpul mags and they have worked fine so I suspect they would work in the Amend2 magazines as well. I will probably test it out here soon to be sure.
I bought two of these last month I've been hearing a lot of people saying that when they buy these they end up spraying their rounds everywhere just by sitting in storage but I keep seeing these comments that are a year old saying that when I bought these last month I haven't had any issues so I'm thinking they fix that issue in the last year
Yeah I am not sure. It's been very interesting to see the different reports from people. I haven't had any issues with these replacements but I don't think I've kept them loaded over time. I will probably fully load them and keep them loaded and see if I have issues since I have seen so many reports of them popping.
@@ArmatisReviews I really think the issues that people are talking about these magazines popping like that are just early issues that they had from manufacturing
I went today to pick up a pistol and 1000 rds of 223 and 1000 rds of 7.62 x 39mm i picked up 3 more ak mags and 3 a2 mags have not used these a2 mags before. SHOP AT CHEROKEE GUN AND PAWN IN CANTON GA> YOU WILL BE HAPPY ! HAPPY! HAPPY! . Hope they work good.
My 1st gen mags were FDE. $50 for six at Gunmag Warehouse I believe. I got rid of them. 2 years later though I'm sorry I got rid of any of them. I did the same with six MFT mags. That's a dozen mags that would have been great backup mags when the FBI, I mean zombies come knocking. At least I still have 17 magazines for one rifle but still, hindsight is 20/20.
They should be just fine. Being compressed for extended periods of time doesn't wear down springs nearly as much compressing and decompressing repeatedly. Now the feed lips, who knows. Maybe that's what you were curious about? I've heard stories of polymer magazines like the Pmags having their feed lips crack over time but I haven't ever experienced that and I have half a dozen Pmags that have been fully loaded for a few years now. It would be an interesting test regardless. Maybe I'll give that a try! Thanks for watching.
I can answer that I load em every time I buy them and I've got some I've had loaded over two years I've finnally rotated them and I've used some they work flawlessly
I had a pair of them that were loaded three weeks ago. I went to take them out to the range today, and one of them had ejected 10 rounds out. The other had ejected two rounds. Looked like the feed lips spread... in three weeks.
I totally get what you're saying. Could that be the case? Possibly. But I honestly don't think that's what happened, and here's my rationale: -They honestly never asked me to give a good review. I reached out to them, they sent out the mags, that was it. -When I approached them about the issues with the mags, they mentioned the cosmetic mags could be the issue. They asked what the dates were on the mags. I didn't want to give them the dates. I wanted them to tell me which dates were part of the cosmetic batch. So I had them give me the dates and I compared it to what I had. They said if they have date stamps on the mags before x date (I don't remember the exact date off the top of my head) then they were cosmetics. So I looked, and mine were a month or two before that deadline which meant they were part of the cosmetic batch, according to them. -They sent me new mags past that deadline, and they functioned perfectly. Now, could it have just been a general screw up in manufacturing and they claim it was a cosmetic batch that were mistakenly sent to me? Sure, that's possible and I get why people would think that. I honestly have no way to know for certain if that's the case or if they were truly cosmetics mistakenly sent to me. But I don't believe that's the case. I'll probably never know for sure. So take the follow up review for what you will. Thanks for watching and for the comment. I appreciate it!
Just picked up 4 of them 10$ each no tax here in WV . Can't use ETS mags in my new Springfield. if i know that i wouldn't got it. js Let you know how they work when i use them.
@@ArmatisReviews No they will not lock into the mag well, took it back to where I bought it and we try the ETS mags in all the Springfield Saint models and none of them ,locked the ETS into the mag wells.
@@ArmatisReviews Me too , when was at the gun store trying to get the ETS Mags to work with my Springfield.i seen the Amend2 MOD 2 mags and tried them right there in my Springfield and they locked in no problem.
Please don't use the amend 2 magazines. i purchased 1 because the store was out of pmag. well it failed miserably. you can load it but when you take pressure off the last round it immediately spits the rounds back out at you. the top of the magazine that retains the round has spread apart almost in a "Y" shape. i had to contact amend 2 twice in a span of 3 weeks to actually get them to respond once. they did say they would cover it under warranty but i would have to pay the cost to send it back to them. well i didn't want to pay more money for a product that had already failed just to get a new one and totally lose out on the cost of shipping it back to them. if you have them i don't suggest loading it and storing it loaded. load, fire, leave it empty when you are done. mine had only been stored loaded roughly about a month. i have plenty of pmags and not one has failed but i have started buying metal mags (aluminum case mags) they have worked flawlessly for our military for decades and they can be trusted. Personally i can't trust my life on an amend 2 mag.
That sucks. I haven't had any issues with my new mags they sent after the cosmetic examples fiasco. But I agree PMAGs have for sure proven to be superior.
I’m from NY and have a fixed Amend2 mag. My rifle double feeds quite often. I can’t tell if it’s the ammo I am using (Igman 5.56 55gr brass) or it’s just the Amend2 mag… I’ve used wolf 5.56 55gr rounds and it barely double fed. So it’s making me believe it’s not the mag? Does anyone have any experience with fixed mags ?
Unmarked "cosmetic" magazines. That is 100% BS lol At best it's a simplified explanation of a sequence of events that resulted in their ownership of free / discounted / full cost faulty mags they didn't want to dispose of for some unstated reason. At worst it's a cover-up for their poor quality. I don't understand why a mag company would be kicking around faulty mags that were indistinguishable from production mags. They should at least offer an explanation about why they still have those magazines and how they get mixed in with production mags to make it seem somewhat plausible, otherwise I have to assume they are lying to cover themselves for creating a low quality product. I have two Amend2 mags and my experience is the company only produces "cosmetic" magazines.
I get what you are saying. Obviously I have no way to know for sure if it was an honest cosmetic mistake or if it was just a defective production. My understanding is that they were made for photos and whatnot, and not necessarily fine-tuned for function yet. But, I am not a manufacturer, I don't know how all of that works or if it makes sense. I will say that I have purchased/used other Amend2 AR-15 mags and they work flawlessly. In fact I just did a test with them with 200gr 300BLK rounds to see if they would feed reliably, as they're technically not designed to work with 300BLK but I've had some people ask me if they work with 300BLK. So I did a test with them and they fed perfectly. So, in my eye they are generally good mags. They don't pay me to say good things about them (if they did then I would never have needed to post an updated review. The first one would have been perfect, right?). I get your skepticism though and I don't blame you. Sorry to hear that your mags are not working for you. Have you tried reaching out to them?
@@ArmatisReviews I'm not trying to cast doubt on your integrity. They gave you an explanation that seemed plausible based on your experiences and you relayed it in the review. I don't buy their explanation though. I can't see them commissioning an expensive mold that produces out-of-spec parts intentionally. It could be they were responsible for the faulty mold and therefore the faulty parts, but they wanted to retain them for displays (gun shows, maybe?) where function doesn't actually matter, and they colloquially refer to them as, "cosmetic." That explanation still provides some points that should probably be addressed: - Why would they use them for displays? Why not send them back, grind them up, and turn them into functioning, sellable products? It happens all the time in the plastics industry. When a supplier delivers a lot that contains maybe a single scratched or out-of-spec part, the whole lot can often be rejected and reprocessed at the supplier's expense. - After failing to separate known faulty parts from sellable parts, what have they done to prevent this? Why should consumers expect to not accidentally receive bad parts? - Is the root cause of the failure that produced the faulty parts understood and corrected, so consumers can expect to receive in-spec parts from now on? The tiniest bit of insight into the failure would help. And so forth. Each possible rationalization I consider poses its own set of unanswered questions that casts doubt on the reasonableness of their explanation. If you're able to press them for more information it would be invaluable for the review. It would also give the company an opportunity to reassure skeptics like myself that they have a handle on it through your review. I'm not into bashing companies just for the fun of it, and I appreciate a good deal. I actually keep these crappy mags because they suck. Practice shooting from them gives me opportunities to fix surprise problems that I don't experience with my other mags.
Yes, I've heard that as well. In my opinion if it's not causing any problems like malfunctions or throwing brass into your face, I wouldn't worry about it too much. If it's functioning properly and reliable and throwing the brass, then it's working. The brass is going forward because the BCG/extractor are throwing the brass into the brass deflector which is bouncing the bras forward.
hey thanks for the reply, mine seem to eject in a 2 to 3 o clock direction wasn't sure if it was an issue ( its not causing any issues other than having to chase my brass)
Yeah that can be annoying for sure. I feel your pain especially for my 300 BLK brass. You could always get something like a brass catcher: amzn.to/2JY0iq4
Sorry I just realized I forgot to answer the second part of your question. On the side of the magazine there are dates in a circle. There should be two triangles pointed to a month and a year. They're very small and might be hard to see.
@@ArmatisReviews I hope that's not right.. because I bought a lot of them from Brownells.. There is an arrow that points to a month and then it says 16.. So I bought several boxes dated from 2016. And they were not being sold as "Cosmetic only"... Will they replace them for me?? Who should I contact?
@@calholli So I got word back on your question. They said that the 7/17 dates are only relevant to the Mod 2 magazines. The ones that you ordered at that time would have been the Mod 1, which are fine. I got some of the first Mod 2 magazines that were cosmetic examples. So you should have no worries my friend! Thanks for the great question.
Wait, really?! That's... interesting and aggravating. I opened up the video probably a dozen times in incognito mode and I got solar panel, Urban Carry holster, and Otto insurance ads.
I haven't tried them with my 300 BLK loads yet. I keep meaning to whenever I take it out but I always forget because I have mags I use specifically for 300BLK. Some day I will remember :/
@@ArmatisReviews yes I checked into out of spec cosmetics those were only dealer samples and not the ones you were able to buy on the store anything 07/16 and newer were in spec you can ask them if you want check out their website
I bought the 3 pack. All garbage. They swell out when I loaded them. 30 round mag loaded with 28 rounds. Cant fit in the gun. Never been shot. And I cant get ahold of anyone.
@Armatis Reviews the 3 pack is called the Patriot 3-Pack special edition with unique red, white and blue internals. Only seen them at Sportsman's Warehouse for $36.99 plus tax.
That's very interesting. I haven't had THAT problem yet. Seems like the QC is all over the place. Some people report love for them, others report similarly to you. Sorry about your luck! :(
Those range shots are GORGEOUS! Good work, Armatis!
Thanks, Johnny! Utah does have some beautiful country!
I see your from Utah; I literally just moved out here 2 months ago from the Midwest. Is there any good public ranges I can draw from holster and do weapon transitions that you can recommend?
These are $10 a piece at my local gunstore. I've bought 2 so far and love them
Nice! My replacements have been running great.
Crap! I just bought 2 of these today... and I paid way too much. $12 bucks ea.
@@philly2x $12 for one? Damn thats expensive. Id return them
@@philly2x dude I bought two of these for 15 bucks
I've bought 14 of these to supplement my gi mags
I concur. Not many deals in the guns & ammo world these days, but this 1 of them
What's cool is that I live in Shelley Idaho, which is a 5 minute drive from their actual headquarters. I'm proud that Idaho is known for these mags.
That's super cool! Wife and I have talked about moving to Idaho some day :)
Aren't pmags made in Idaho to
@@jeremydarkcountrysteckman9496 Nope they’re made in Cheyenne, Wyoming. You’re close though.
Good review. Nice job. I bought 10 of these magazines in 2018.
Thank you!
I love my Ammend 2 mags!
Mine from this batch have been great!
@@ArmatisReviews It's cool being about 150 miles from them as well. I try to support Idaho made products.
@@TangoCharlieAlpha Awesome! That's one reason I like to support SilencerCo.
Supersonic .300 AAC Blackout 110 to 147 grain bullets work fine in 5.56 x 45 magazines in my experience. I love AR-15 rifles chambered in .300 Blackout, 7.62 x 39 and 6.5 x 39 Grendel.
I've used 200gr 300BLK in my Magpul mags and they have worked fine so I suspect they would work in the Amend2 magazines as well. I will probably test it out here soon to be sure.
I bought two of these last month I've been hearing a lot of people saying that when they buy these they end up spraying their rounds everywhere just by sitting in storage but I keep seeing these comments that are a year old saying that when I bought these last month I haven't had any issues so I'm thinking they fix that issue in the last year
Yeah I am not sure. It's been very interesting to see the different reports from people. I haven't had any issues with these replacements but I don't think I've kept them loaded over time. I will probably fully load them and keep them loaded and see if I have issues since I have seen so many reports of them popping.
@@ArmatisReviews I really think the issues that people are talking about these magazines popping like that are just early issues that they had from manufacturing
Good ! Thanks!
I went today to pick up a pistol and 1000 rds of 223 and 1000 rds of 7.62 x 39mm i picked up 3 more ak mags and 3 a2 mags have not used these a2 mags before. SHOP AT CHEROKEE GUN AND PAWN IN CANTON GA> YOU WILL BE HAPPY ! HAPPY! HAPPY! . Hope they work good.
Nice! Enjoy your haul!
@@ArmatisReviews thanks have a nice day just ordered 10 a2.mags Last night for 104.00 with tax and promo code Trump 2020.
My 1st gen mags were FDE. $50 for six at Gunmag Warehouse I believe. I got rid of them. 2 years later though I'm sorry I got rid of any of them. I did the same with six MFT mags. That's a dozen mags that would have been great backup mags when the FBI, I mean zombies come knocking. At least I still have 17 magazines for one rifle but still, hindsight is 20/20.
Very rarely do I get rid of gun things. My wife hates it 😂
I have the originals mine work just fine
Awesome!
I have 2 of these mags. I have the Hilary Clinton behind bars version and the regular one. I love both of theme. They work great at the range
Those are awesome mag designs!
I'd like to know how they hold up after being fully loaded for months at a time. You're video is well made. Keep them brief . People will watch.
They should be just fine. Being compressed for extended periods of time doesn't wear down springs nearly as much compressing and decompressing repeatedly. Now the feed lips, who knows. Maybe that's what you were curious about? I've heard stories of polymer magazines like the Pmags having their feed lips crack over time but I haven't ever experienced that and I have half a dozen Pmags that have been fully loaded for a few years now. It would be an interesting test regardless. Maybe I'll give that a try! Thanks for watching.
Thanks, Armantis
I can answer that I load em every time I buy them and I've got some I've had loaded over two years I've finnally rotated them and I've used some they work flawlessly
I had a pair of them that were loaded three weeks ago. I went to take them out to the range today, and one of them had ejected 10 rounds out. The other had ejected two rounds. Looked like the feed lips spread... in three weeks.
The 2 on the bottom is just a "good accent", it's a functional base plate removal button!
Yup.
Anybody noticed the feed lips spreading after time fully loaded? Because I have. Very disappointed. Had high hopes for Amend2.
I haven't noticed it myself. I will check next time I load up.
Thinking about a 10 round version.
Go for it! I think you'll be pleased.
Armatis Reviews definitely!
Why would anyone want a 10 round version?
Hurricane 863 my thoughts exactly lmao. He must live in California
@@OwnedEpicStyle ya no body thinks about a 10 round version of ANYTHING unless they live in a commie state
The manufacturer sent you a sample and it didn't work, then they send you a second hand picked sample and it worked. That isn't very encouraging!
I totally get what you're saying. Could that be the case? Possibly. But I honestly don't think that's what happened, and here's my rationale:
-They honestly never asked me to give a good review. I reached out to them, they sent out the mags, that was it.
-When I approached them about the issues with the mags, they mentioned the cosmetic mags could be the issue. They asked what the dates were on the mags. I didn't want to give them the dates. I wanted them to tell me which dates were part of the cosmetic batch. So I had them give me the dates and I compared it to what I had. They said if they have date stamps on the mags before x date (I don't remember the exact date off the top of my head) then they were cosmetics. So I looked, and mine were a month or two before that deadline which meant they were part of the cosmetic batch, according to them.
-They sent me new mags past that deadline, and they functioned perfectly.
Now, could it have just been a general screw up in manufacturing and they claim it was a cosmetic batch that were mistakenly sent to me? Sure, that's possible and I get why people would think that. I honestly have no way to know for certain if that's the case or if they were truly cosmetics mistakenly sent to me. But I don't believe that's the case. I'll probably never know for sure. So take the follow up review for what you will.
Thanks for watching and for the comment. I appreciate it!
Just picked up 4 of them 10$ each no tax here in WV . Can't use ETS mags in my new Springfield. if i know that i wouldn't got it. js Let you know how they work when i use them.
Look forward to hearing how they work for you! Do the ETS mags just not feed well in your Springfield?
@@ArmatisReviews No they will not lock into the mag well, took it back to where I bought it and we try the ETS mags in all the Springfield Saint models and none of them ,locked the ETS into the mag wells.
@@mofoco1971 Huh, interesting. I use ETS mags in my MP5K clone and my Glock/Vector and no issues. That's unfortunate! Sorry they don't work for you.
@@ArmatisReviews Me too , when was at the gun store trying to get the ETS Mags to work with my Springfield.i seen the Amend2 MOD 2 mags and tried them right there in my Springfield and they locked in no problem.
@@mofoco1971 Nice! Hope they work well for you!
I think they mint have worked for magpul . I have a bunch of 1 my mags work just fine
I have 2 mod twos and it always has failure to feed and when you load 30 it spits them out.
Thank you, Sir
My Condolences to our 13 Fallen Soldiers.
Our Bravest, Protecting America,
Semper Fidelis
Masonry Plus
Florida
I've got desert Earth mod ones and od green and black
Nice!
Please don't use the amend 2 magazines. i purchased 1 because the store was out of pmag. well it failed miserably. you can load it but when you take pressure off the last round it immediately spits the rounds back out at you. the top of the magazine that retains the round has spread apart almost in a "Y" shape. i had to contact amend 2 twice in a span of 3 weeks to actually get them to respond once. they did say they would cover it under warranty but i would have to pay the cost to send it back to them. well i didn't want to pay more money for a product that had already failed just to get a new one and totally lose out on the cost of shipping it back to them. if you have them i don't suggest loading it and storing it loaded. load, fire, leave it empty when you are done. mine had only been stored loaded roughly about a month. i have plenty of pmags and not one has failed but i have started buying metal mags (aluminum case mags) they have worked flawlessly for our military for decades and they can be trusted. Personally i can't trust my life on an amend 2 mag.
That sucks. I haven't had any issues with my new mags they sent after the cosmetic examples fiasco. But I agree PMAGs have for sure proven to be superior.
I’m from NY and have a fixed Amend2 mag. My rifle double feeds quite often. I can’t tell if it’s the ammo I am using (Igman 5.56 55gr brass) or it’s just the Amend2 mag…
I’ve used wolf 5.56 55gr rounds and it barely double fed. So it’s making me believe it’s not the mag? Does anyone have any experience with fixed mags ?
I'm afraid I don't, personally. Sorry! Hopefully someone can give some info.
@@ArmatisReviews thanks !!
What is the Silencer you are using at 3:27 into clip?
SilencerCo Omega 300
Unmarked "cosmetic" magazines. That is 100% BS lol
At best it's a simplified explanation of a sequence of events that resulted in their ownership of free / discounted / full cost faulty mags they didn't want to dispose of for some unstated reason. At worst it's a cover-up for their poor quality. I don't understand why a mag company would be kicking around faulty mags that were indistinguishable from production mags.
They should at least offer an explanation about why they still have those magazines and how they get mixed in with production mags to make it seem somewhat plausible, otherwise I have to assume they are lying to cover themselves for creating a low quality product. I have two Amend2 mags and my experience is the company only produces "cosmetic" magazines.
I get what you are saying. Obviously I have no way to know for sure if it was an honest cosmetic mistake or if it was just a defective production.
My understanding is that they were made for photos and whatnot, and not necessarily fine-tuned for function yet. But, I am not a manufacturer, I don't know how all of that works or if it makes sense.
I will say that I have purchased/used other Amend2 AR-15 mags and they work flawlessly. In fact I just did a test with them with 200gr 300BLK rounds to see if they would feed reliably, as they're technically not designed to work with 300BLK but I've had some people ask me if they work with 300BLK. So I did a test with them and they fed perfectly.
So, in my eye they are generally good mags. They don't pay me to say good things about them (if they did then I would never have needed to post an updated review. The first one would have been perfect, right?).
I get your skepticism though and I don't blame you. Sorry to hear that your mags are not working for you. Have you tried reaching out to them?
@@ArmatisReviews I'm not trying to cast doubt on your integrity. They gave you an explanation that seemed plausible based on your experiences and you relayed it in the review.
I don't buy their explanation though. I can't see them commissioning an expensive mold that produces out-of-spec parts intentionally. It could be they were responsible for the faulty mold and therefore the faulty parts, but they wanted to retain them for displays (gun shows, maybe?) where function doesn't actually matter, and they colloquially refer to them as, "cosmetic."
That explanation still provides some points that should probably be addressed:
- Why would they use them for displays? Why not send them back, grind them up, and turn them into functioning, sellable products? It happens all the time in the plastics industry. When a supplier delivers a lot that contains maybe a single scratched or out-of-spec part, the whole lot can often be rejected and reprocessed at the supplier's expense.
- After failing to separate known faulty parts from sellable parts, what have they done to prevent this? Why should consumers expect to not accidentally receive bad parts?
- Is the root cause of the failure that produced the faulty parts understood and corrected, so consumers can expect to receive in-spec parts from now on? The tiniest bit of insight into the failure would help.
And so forth. Each possible rationalization I consider poses its own set of unanswered questions that casts doubt on the reasonableness of their explanation. If you're able to press them for more information it would be invaluable for the review. It would also give the company an opportunity to reassure skeptics like myself that they have a handle on it through your review. I'm not into bashing companies just for the fun of it, and I appreciate a good deal.
I actually keep these crappy mags because they suck. Practice shooting from them gives me opportunities to fix surprise problems that I don't experience with my other mags.
I ordered a ten round because I’m in ny. Does the base plate come off Incase I get a jam. Unfortunately my mag has to be fixed.
They sure do! Just like a Magpul magazine.
@@ArmatisReviews thanks for your reply!
so the 2021 mod 2 batches should be trouble free?
Yeah they should definitely be good to go as far as I know.
I heard something about forward ejecting shells being indicative of an over gassed gun? ever heard anything about that
Yes, I've heard that as well. In my opinion if it's not causing any problems like malfunctions or throwing brass into your face, I wouldn't worry about it too much. If it's functioning properly and reliable and throwing the brass, then it's working. The brass is going forward because the BCG/extractor are throwing the brass into the brass deflector which is bouncing the bras forward.
hey thanks for the reply, mine seem to eject in a 2 to 3 o clock direction wasn't sure if it was an issue ( its not causing any issues other than having to chase my brass)
Yeah that can be annoying for sure. I feel your pain especially for my 300 BLK brass. You could always get something like a brass catcher: amzn.to/2JY0iq4
So what was this "date" of the mags and how do we find it on the mags??? I want to see if mine are the out of spec mags also?
I was told if they were made before 7/17 they were cosmetic examples. The ones I had were 6/17. The new ones they sent me have been working great.
Sorry I just realized I forgot to answer the second part of your question. On the side of the magazine there are dates in a circle. There should be two triangles pointed to a month and a year. They're very small and might be hard to see.
@@ArmatisReviews I hope that's not right.. because I bought a lot of them from Brownells.. There is an arrow that points to a month and then it says 16.. So I bought several boxes dated from 2016. And they were not being sold as "Cosmetic only"... Will they replace them for me?? Who should I contact?
@@calholli Let me email my contact and see what I can find out and I'll let you know!
@@calholli So I got word back on your question. They said that the 7/17 dates are only relevant to the Mod 2 magazines. The ones that you ordered at that time would have been the Mod 1, which are fine. I got some of the first Mod 2 magazines that were cosmetic examples. So you should have no worries my friend! Thanks for the great question.
Do they come with dust covers?
Negative. Mine didn't, anyway.
I have a mod 1 that's fde
Sweet!
How have these held up?
The replacement mags have been holding up great. I just use them as range mags but no problems with the replacements.
I had an ad for a petition to ban all high capacity magazines play before this video.
Wait, really?! That's... interesting and aggravating. I opened up the video probably a dozen times in incognito mode and I got solar panel, Urban Carry holster, and Otto insurance ads.
@@ArmatisReviews Yeah. If I had a way of proving it, I would. YT must be onto me, I've been watching a lot of videos on firearms and whatnot.
@@pixelbucket8884 Yeah that's super lame! YT at it again.
Have you used these mags for 300 blkout?
I haven't tried them with my 300 BLK loads yet. I keep meaning to whenever I take it out but I always forget because I have mags I use specifically for 300BLK. Some day I will remember :/
Armatis Reviews I’ve got some I’m going to use for mine if I remember to I’ll let you know how they worked once it’s built
@@jakekelleycustoms Sounds awesome. Thanks!
I have there's no difference in feeding
Price?
Right now they're like $11 or so depending on where you find them.
I picked up a pack of these off Ammunitiondepot for a pretty great price. They feel very quality built mags.
I agree! A great alternative if someone wants to try out some good high quality mags for a good price. Thanks for watching!
They're all I buy anymore can't beat the price or the quality for the money I just wish that they would put the Minuteman on the mod2s
@@jeremysteckman6234 Yeah they're definitely nice mags for a good price. I still need to try out their glock mags!
@@ArmatisReviews yes I checked into out of spec cosmetics those were only dealer samples and not the ones you were able to buy on the store anything 07/16 and newer were in spec you can ask them if you want check out their website
@@ArmatisReviews didn't know they made Glock mags gonna have to go back and check them out thanks for the tip
Mags that were made not for uses LUL
*shrug*
I must have got some of the bad ones cause they don't feed for s***.
That's unfortunate. Mine are still going strong. Did you try reaching out to them?
I bought the 3 pack. All garbage. They swell out when I loaded them. 30 round mag loaded with 28 rounds. Cant fit in the gun. Never been shot. And I cant get ahold of anyone.
Wow, really? I honestly haven't had a problem like that at all with any of mine. Are you sure they're legitimate? I haven't seen a 3 pack before.
@Armatis Reviews the 3 pack is called the Patriot 3-Pack special edition with unique red, white and blue internals. Only seen them at Sportsman's Warehouse for $36.99 plus tax.
@@ManuelDiaz-db5pj Ah gotcha. Thanks for the info!
@@ArmatisReviews You are welcome also the 10, 20 and 30 rounders come in 3 other colors fde, od green and grey.
Did you get the mod2? Still sitting on my cart for $11 each over at Primary Arms just can't get myself to pay $10 for 2 Mags shipping lol
Load them and smack the butt. Rounds will fall out. Not a PMAGS
Everywhere it's out of stock wth
Looks like Mag Commander has some.
Go to a cal-ranch store if you have one in your area. They sell them for $10 and seem to always have them in stock
These mags are terrible. Mind won't feed if they have more than 3 cartridges in them
Yeah, seem to be very mixed reviews. Some people have great experiences, some don't. Seems pretty hit and miss.
Absolute junk , I’ve got two and if you load over 15 you’d better make sure you have safely glasses…because the rounds are coming back out.
That's very interesting. I haven't had THAT problem yet. Seems like the QC is all over the place. Some people report love for them, others report similarly to you. Sorry about your luck! :(