I actually live alone, and feel lonely. But videos about the cosmos and why the universe is the way it is makes me curious to learn more. Thanks Anton for uploading daily. 🙏
So the Jumbos are basically like the small to medium towns that are stuck in-between large metro cities. All the resources flow to the metros while the towns in-between them get left behind. JUMBOS are the New Haven and Providence stuck in-between Boston and New York.
It's exciting to be alive in a time when science is uncovering so many wonders about our universe, and people like Anton are here to share and explain that knowledge to everyone.
@@BackYardScience2000 true, but we can do that in a lab board or a computer. I want to know how the chamber stones were moved as that's more important than sun being made
@BackYardScience2000 that might be true, but it's more important to know how the Pyramid and Machu Picchu were built. As far as I know we know less about our seas than the skies. It's too out would looking for humans
To share my uptake from Anton's upload, we need dedicated regional telescopes with high enough definition to capture entire planetary lensing event from the transit behind stars, to deconstruct it to the actual planet; and then indeed, the only thing that makes it bearable than it would've been better to have been born 500 years from now, is Anton.
@@kizashikaze9066 hey you never know it's fascinating to actually a pretty small number of people that you can directly image small jupiter-sized objects in binary systems that far away
Ahhh, Anton. Every time you use the words "intriguing","mysterious", "bizarre", "unknown", "somewhat unusual". Mate, you brighten up my day. Thank you and your family for keeping us excited about the new discoveries!
Great video Anton. Very cool to hear about what seems like a reasonable explanation for so many FFPs and JuMBOs. Further confirmation that the stellar neighborhood is vitally important to stellar and planetary formation and that lots of areas of the Universe are vastly different from our own. Gotta wonder what other types of bizarre initial conditions are out there and what types of stars/planets that can lead to.
I think we should not be surprised any more, every new discovery is turning out to be totally awesone for which goes beyond anything we could predict or imagine.
Its not difficult to give an answer to that really, might be the most plausibel one as well, especially if its confirmed by aliens also. Its also very wholesome
I guess i should expect with the ability to resolve individual stars in other galaxies, that black body objects the size of large planets would be even higher resolution when looking at things in our own galaxtly. But to see rogue planets with more resolution than the earth in the pale blue dot pic is still stunningly amazing!
Less than 1% of 200-400 billion star systems in the Milky Way is still a pretty high number. We would expect to see at least 2billion of these instances, and then out of those on a bell curve, we would have 20million or more super large ones and 20million super small ones. Once we are into these kinds of numbers we need to always remember scale. Very cool video, great graphics, thank you for all you do to educate and entertain us.
There is something that has drawn me to Orion my whole life. Have even dreamed about in my exceptionally rare dreams. Dunno shat it is so love new info!!!
As our tools get better and better, and as we start to use them in a coordinated manner, we are quickly amassing data about our universe. Exciting! Thanks for bringing the data and the explanations to us, Anton!
Thanks 🙏 This video reminds me to get my Death-Star planetary sized mother ship on order before the post ascension rush.. it’ll add zeros on to delivery timescales.. get in quick while you can 🙃 lol
I have three Jumbos in my refrigerator at the moment. A binary pair on the middle rack, a single one in the lower door bin. One liter of San Miguel Red Horse beer in each one. "Jumbo" is a common name for a one liter bottle of beer here in Mindanao Philippines. Obviously out there in space not everyone gets to become a star...
They are planets who were formed by: heavier leftover elements scattered and later coalesced through the expanse in on themselves, forming heavy dust particle formed bodies. maybe possibly
thanks for a great video anton and look forward to updates as they occur i was wondering if a new star could cause the collapse of gas nearby forming two 'failed stars' it will be interesting at what the future brings
Hey Anton, what do you think about Richard Lieu's new paper "The binding of cosmological structures by massless topological defects" where he proposes, gravity can exist without mass due to topological defects in spacetime? Lieu proposes, there is no need to invoke dark matter. Galaxies have an inner shell of positive mass and an outer shell of negative mass resulting in net zero mass along the outer regions creating curvatures in the fabric of spacetime where stars can experience intense gravitational pull towards the galactic centre without any additional dark matter to hold them in place.
When I learned about the Oort cloud and how much 'stuff' is probably out there lurking just around our solar system, I imagined that there must likely be an incredible amount of relatively small objects in the universe 'in between' stars and, maybe, galaxies that we'd never be able to detect. Could this not be some of the 'missing mass' scientists are looking for?
I'm curious to know more about the unusual radiation spectrum of these objects. Is it incompatible with objects at a certain temperature emitting radiation under the Boltzman law? If so, what exactly does it look like? Can't be explained as the sum of two known types of spectrum distributions? Could a partially active nuclear reaction at the core offer any explanation?
The atoms that make up all matter are kind of like a dwarf universe if you think about it. But not too much. I'm not a scientist of any kind, but I am a comment on a youtube video and that's just as reliable 👍
he said space engine yéééh. Also could that explain the ratio between red dwarf and bigger star ? Since in star nursery some star could have the potential to be bigger but got bully and got their food eject outside their range. An other thing to think about is the star environment when it forming. That makes the video a bit more useful for me .
I don't by the Planet capture by a passing star hypothesis. For one, everything is too far apart. Two, it has been proposed many times for things in our own solar system, like Planet 9 and jostling of objects from the Ort Cloud to send them towards the inner planets, but nobody has ever pointed out which stars do this...the trajectory of every nearby star has been calculated and none have been near our solar system.
how many stars vs how many rogue planets? (not just the Jumbos.) Though I think Jumbos are cool topics too. Does the photoerosion also address them? The proportion of jumbos to rogue planets in this sample doesn't seem to match that of binary/multiple stars vs single stars.
That strains such credulity although you guys are on the right track that they form in binaries because they are like stars they were supposed to be stars. Plasma cosmology states that the difference in some of these stars are just their location on a Birkeland current or not
Nope, plasma cosmology is a long since failed hypothesis that had very few adherents. They never said that, though. Only a bunch of unpublished, unqualified mythologists known as 'electric universe' claim that. Here is a clue for the hard of (plasma) physics; Birkeland currents are an induced effect that only exist within planetary magnetospheres. Stars are observed to form in molecular clouds. Those clouds are very cold (~ 10-50 K), and overwhelmingly neutral gas. Ionisation fraction? ~ 1 part in many millions. Not even a plasma. And no currents.
Lol! Stars form in molecular clouds. As observed. They are cold (~ 10-50 K), dense clouds of neutral gas. Not even a plasma. Ionisation fraction of 1 part in many millions. No currents. And Birkeland currents only exist in planetary magnetospheres. Nowhere else. Learn plasma physics. As a retired plasma physicist I am happy to help :)
Plasma cosmology is a long since failed hypothesis that had very few adherents. It was started by Hannes Alfven and Oskar Klein. Neither of whom thought stars formed in currents. And Alfven certainly knew that Birkeland currents, as they became known, only exist in planetary magnetospheres. And knew that stars are powered by fusion in their cores. I think you are getting mixed up with the neo-Velikovskian cult known as 'electric universe'. Which is on the same level as flat earth.
I'm reserved on the 'failed star' explanation. A binary FFP scenario = more likely. I've been arguing the direct-collapse explanation for primordial BHs for 10yrs +, maybe before any1 else had. Just didn't get the recognition cuz of lack of 'peer review'... This is likely the same thing, direct-collapse FFPs. They're prob binary due to shape/distribution and gravitational co-influence on the aggregating interstellar debris/dust. Since they're the closest to one-another: the planet either sheers in 2x (uncommonly) OR the debris aggregates in 2+ spots early on, and once it reaches high enough gravity, they co-orbit one another...if there were 2+, then 3body problem = the 3rd+ gets ejected from the 'system' or absorbed into one...Leaving a binary FFP system.
The radio emissions might suggest a strong magnetic field from these planets or failed stars. Maybe the binaries interact with each other, well, surely.
Gravity might not have isotopes but it does appear that there is something strange about gravity that could possibly put it into different categories such as gravity one, two or three. Possibly being a keyword.
Any reason why the process that forms stars couldn't also happen in more rarefied regions leading to binary sub-stars forming the same way as binary star systems form?
Imagine all the planets and moons orbiting those two jumbos in the image. You think any goldilocks zones exist around those two? I do. Any life ,plant life or other would be resilient against radiation though. ~Alaska
so what is the difference in how they emit radio waves and how brown and red dwarfs do ? how is it different from other jupiter and larger planets ? is there anything it is similar to ?
Or maybe it is the other way around. Could be jumbos form from a certain type of explosion or collapse. If a specific type of stars life ends. It produces enough gas in the right places to form jumbos. Or the gas it produces is from a very unform nature. I assume that uniform clouds have much higher chance creating many small objects.
Not NASA's, but International Astronomical Union. And even then, the part of a definition of a planet is that it's in orbit around our Sun. Meaning that, by this definition, exoplanets are not planets. Just goes to show that definitions and semantics just need to be officially updated, like it happened to dwarf planets.
The Greek word planet' or 'planetes' means "wanderer" I would say' as long as it's moving' wandering' and within size category' it could be called a planet, orbital or rogue.
They could be very old cooled down white dwarf stars where they where big hot fast burning stars that went through their main sequence life fast and then collapsed in to white dwarfs but since most stars are double stars these both lived fast and both tuned in to white dwarf stars together and started to cool down and orbited each other in the Orion Nebula producing radio waves as they cool and spin fast like a Neutron star but now very cool running out of the heat they once had millions of years before? They could even be a odd class of brown dwarf stars we not seen before?
I bet when the binaries form, perhaps before the sun adds enough mass, they orbit eachother with enough forcel to slowly propel themselves out of the stars gravity.
Conclusion, there's a lot of things going on in the depths of the universe that we don't understand and probably don't need to know about. Meanwhile, back inside our skulls 💀
Yes, if something is complex, best to just forget about it. Surely "God" wouldn't want us to know it anyway. Glad that's not the prevailing sentiment, or we'd still be banging rocks together to make fire.
I know what those objects are! They're Frisbee's! If one of them is Green & Blue with a black lightning strike painted on it, that's mine. Dido on the accolades.
I don't like the first explanation, if they said the pair was unlucky and hit by the blast of a nearby star and the pair tumbled away drawing on the other's gravitational pull, to me, sounds more plausible.
Electric Universe hypothesis: They are born like pearls on a necklace of high current filaments (like the ones seen in the "cosmic web"), twisting around each other in spiral paths. Z pinches compress the matter into these planet sizes. The matter is aggregated through Marklund convection. The different types of matter, amounts, the intensity of the current and frequencies, determine what kind of (unique) object is created.
That's a great summary. Electric forces play a much larger role in the universe than mainstream science acknowledges. Powerful electric currents connect planets, stars, and even galaxies, forming this huge, dynamic web. This could explain some cosmic phenomena in ways gravity-based models have always struggled with...
Lol! EU is a mythology-based cult. And how are you getting currents in molecular clouds where stars are observed to form? They are cold ( ~10-50 K), dense clouds of NEUTRAL gas. Ionisation fraction of 1 part in many millions. Any currents would be blindingly obvious. As well as being impossible! And the cosmic web is no sort of current. At least, not according to anyone familiar with it.
@@tatan0x _"Powerful electric currents connect planets, stars, and even galaxies"_ No they don't. Learn plasma physics. Plasmas are quasi-neutral. There are no currents connecting planets, stars or galaxies. That is not only impossible, but would be very obvious.
This topic and runthrough has to be one of your best ever! I mean, 500+??? Amazing. Also, did I hear you say you do some of those animations yourself? Sweet. Thanks Anton!
If planets could be created without a star's planetary disk, and all of these dark objects could be lumped with the dark objects produced over the generations of stars through time, would there be enough mass to produce the gravitational effects we see today, without the effects of up until now unseen, dark matter?
In a word, no. Not even close. One thing we do know is that whatever dark matter is, it is not 'normal' (i.e. baryonic) matter. When we see galaxy clusters collide, we see the 'normal' matter get hung up in the middle of the collision, as it interacts with the other 'normal' matter in what it is colliding with. However, when we look at gravitational lensing observations of the aftermath of those collisions, the vast majority of the mass is on the periphery, and not where the 'normal' matter is. So, it isn't interacting with 'normal' matter, and is not reacting electromagnetically. As a check, we can look at non-colliding clusters and see the mass to be evenly distributed. So, that is a very strong argument for DM having mass, but not being 'normal' matter.
I wonder if the rogue planet discovered by an Einstein Ring effect might even be a (mythical?) planetary mass black hole left over from the Big Bang early days. {o.o}
A New Class of Objects! In 2024, I can't believe it. There's so many in M42 they have to form as Binaries. How about H.R.B's - Hot Radio Binaries. A whole New Class of Astronomers specializing in these objects could emerge.
This is one thing that's always bothered me about "dark matter" How do we know there's not just a lot more baryonic matter in the universe? Maybe our solar system is uniquely sparse compared to most stars. Maybe most stars actually have hundreds of small body rocky planets like earth, and our system is different because we had some sort of close encounter billions of years ago that kicked out 90% of the mass?
![เจ็บที่ยังฮัก - ม่อน วรวิทย์ [ Official Mv ] จอนนี่มิวสิค](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/KALIGSRSjFs/mqdefault.jpg)
The radio emissions make perfect sense. Like many failed stars they all have podcasts.
😃😄😆😁😋
I actually live alone, and feel lonely. But videos about the cosmos and why the universe is the way it is makes me curious to learn more. Thanks Anton for uploading daily. 🙏
Hi I live with a little dog and three cats, cockatiels, chooks and two ducks, so I'm never lonely. Have you thought of getting a Pet?
Take nightschool classes -- good way to meet folk:)
Your never alone you live in the most wonderful place full of beautiful living things 😊
@@aishaburhaniyya7532 Nice aa, now I came back to my parents in Mumbai.. I am feeling better. 😊🙏 Thank you and you also take care. 😊🙏
Thanks my friend.. I came back home today. You also take care. 😊🙏
So the Jumbos are basically like the small to medium towns that are stuck in-between large metro cities. All the resources flow to the metros while the towns in-between them get left behind. JUMBOS are the New Haven and Providence stuck in-between Boston and New York.
As a Boston native your example had me laughing. So New England.
Cringe.
It's exciting to be alive in a time when science is uncovering so many wonders about our universe, and people like Anton are here to share and explain that knowledge to everyone.
Let's be honest, you'd love to see the Pyramids being built? Because we can see a planet isn't as fascinating as how they were built
@@ghollidgewe can see planets being built right now, though. Many of them actually. We see planets in all stages of their formation.
@@BackYardScience2000 true, but we can do that in a lab board or a computer. I want to know how the chamber stones were moved as that's more important than sun being made
@BackYardScience2000 that might be true, but it's more important to know how the Pyramid and Machu Picchu were built. As far as I know we know less about our seas than the skies. It's too out would looking for humans
To share my uptake from Anton's upload, we need dedicated regional telescopes with high enough definition to capture entire planetary lensing event from the transit behind stars, to deconstruct it to the actual planet; and then indeed, the only thing that makes it bearable than it would've been better to have been born 500 years from now, is Anton.
Man I really hope I'm not the only one excited to see this
...there is another
Seriously?
Don't worry, at least 28 excited others allready....and counting... 😉
@@kizashikaze9066 hey you never know it's fascinating to actually a pretty small number of people that you can directly image small jupiter-sized objects in binary systems that far away
Can confirm. Am excited
Ahhh, Anton. Every time you use the words "intriguing","mysterious", "bizarre", "unknown", "somewhat unusual". Mate, you brighten up my day. Thank you and your family for keeping us excited about the new discoveries!
Great video Anton. Very cool to hear about what seems like a reasonable explanation for so many FFPs and JuMBOs. Further confirmation that the stellar neighborhood is vitally important to stellar and planetary formation and that lots of areas of the Universe are vastly different from our own. Gotta wonder what other types of bizarre initial conditions are out there and what types of stars/planets that can lead to.
I think we should not be surprised any more, every new discovery is turning out to be totally awesone for which goes beyond anything we could predict or imagine.
Wonderful as always Anton. Thank you. 👊🙂
Another morning with tea and Anton. What could be better? Ah yes! Rain outside my window. Perfect!😂
Tell me you're from the UK without telling me you're from the uk 😂
@jeffclarkofclarklesparkle3103 Russia actually 😉
It’s good to like the Rain,I’m getting rain today on Friday!
42 = truth about life and existence is somewhere around there
Truth, Life, the Universe,...Everything really 🤷♂
Its not difficult to give an answer to that really, might be the most plausibel one as well, especially if its confirmed by aliens also. Its also very wholesome
Thank you for your very interesting report. Watching from New Ulm, Minnesota
Grew up in Gaylord. How's Herman? Love the phasing that the Jumbos were "born next to a bully."
Thank you Anton.
I guess i should expect with the ability to resolve individual stars in other galaxies, that black body objects the size of large planets would be even higher resolution when looking at things in our own galaxtly. But to see rogue planets with more resolution than the earth in the pale blue dot pic is still stunningly amazing!
Epic episode, thank you Anton.
Attack ships on fire off the shoulder of Orion. RIP Rutger Hauer
It’s not easy to meet your maker.
Really incredible to hear and see of this! Stunning!
Less than 1% of 200-400 billion star systems in the Milky Way is still a pretty high number. We would expect to see at least 2billion of these instances, and then out of those on a bell curve, we would have 20million or more super large ones and 20million super small ones. Once we are into these kinds of numbers we need to always remember scale. Very cool video, great graphics, thank you for all you do to educate and entertain us.
That's so awesome! That's exactly what I thought might be going on with these JuMBOs when I saw your first video on the subject.
Love watching your channel
There is something that has drawn me to Orion my whole life. Have even dreamed about in my exceptionally rare dreams. Dunno shat it is so love new info!!!
Same with the pharaohs and everyone else.
@@freehat2722what do you mean?
Exciting video,thanks Anton 👍❤
No, your a wonderful person. And have wonderful views ❤
As our tools get better and better, and as we start to use them in a coordinated manner, we are quickly amassing data about our universe. Exciting!
Thanks for bringing the data and the explanations to us, Anton!
I miss the Space Engine simulation videos.
anyone remember the universe sandbox ones
Thanks 🙏
This video reminds me to get my Death-Star planetary sized mother ship on order before the post ascension rush.. it’ll add zeros on to delivery timescales.. get in quick while you can 🙃 lol
Thank you Anton!
Well... If it counts for anything, this explanation makes perfect sense. I just don't know if it's correct.
I have three Jumbos in my refrigerator at the moment. A binary pair on the middle rack, a single one in the lower door bin. One liter of San Miguel Red Horse beer in each one. "Jumbo" is a common name for a one liter bottle of beer here in Mindanao Philippines. Obviously out there in space not everyone gets to become a star...
...as opposed to everyone on earth?
They are planets who were formed by: heavier leftover elements scattered and later coalesced through the expanse in on themselves, forming heavy dust particle formed bodies. maybe possibly
thanks for a great video anton and look forward to updates as they occur
i was wondering if a new star could cause the collapse of gas nearby forming two 'failed stars'
it will be interesting at what the future brings
Good job as usual young man.
He is 83
Could they be super magnetic Jupiters and the emission is synchrotron emission?
Hey Anton, what do you think about Richard Lieu's new paper "The binding of cosmological structures by massless topological defects" where he proposes, gravity can exist without mass due to topological defects in spacetime? Lieu proposes, there is no need to invoke dark matter. Galaxies have an inner shell of positive mass and an outer shell of negative mass resulting in net zero mass along the outer regions creating curvatures in the fabric of spacetime where stars can experience intense gravitational pull towards the galactic centre without any additional dark matter to hold them in place.
He probably doesn't think that the idea warrants discussion, and rightfully so.
When I learned about the Oort cloud and how much 'stuff' is probably out there lurking just around our solar system, I imagined that there must likely be an incredible amount of relatively small objects in the universe 'in between' stars and, maybe, galaxies that we'd never be able to detect.
Could this not be some of the 'missing mass' scientists are looking for?
Anton, you're English pronunciation is really improving! I'm sure you're working hard at it. Well done!
These present crazy physics possibilities and probably have a ton of moons too
Love space engine! But I think like I'm just scratching the surface when I'm in there. I don't feel like I know what I'm doing.
I am that way with life. Don't know what I'm doing sometimes, but it's fun trying to figure it out.
You can find neutron stars and black holes in some open clusters
I'm curious to know more about the unusual radiation spectrum of these objects. Is it incompatible with objects at a certain temperature emitting radiation under the Boltzman law? If so, what exactly does it look like? Can't be explained as the sum of two known types of spectrum distributions? Could a partially active nuclear reaction at the core offer any explanation?
In a group or scattered evenly? Local events or universal relating cycles? thanks
If we can have dwarf planets, why not dwarf solar systems, too?
The atoms that make up all matter are kind of like a dwarf universe if you think about it. But not too much. I'm not a scientist of any kind, but I am a comment on a youtube video and that's just as reliable 👍
There might be planets orbiting brown dwarves
Great looking hair today Anton.
he said space engine yéééh. Also could that explain the ratio between red dwarf and bigger star ? Since in star nursery some star could have the potential to be bigger but got bully and got their food eject outside their range. An other thing to think about is the star environment when it forming. That makes the video a bit more useful for me .
Are there any exoplanets in plades star system
Nappa: Vegeta look. It's a paparazzi...
Vegeta: G*dammit Nappa.
Nappa: I have to protect my image! 💥
any theories on radio emission mechanics?
"I've seen things, you people wouldn't believe, attack ships on fire off the shoulder of Orion-"
I don't by the Planet capture by a passing star hypothesis.
For one, everything is too far apart. Two, it has been proposed many times for things in our own solar system, like Planet 9 and jostling of objects from the Ort Cloud to send them towards the inner planets, but nobody has ever pointed out which stars do this...the trajectory of every nearby star has been calculated and none have been near our solar system.
Maybe they collided like Earth and Theia and just got thrown out of the star system completely?
how many stars vs how many rogue planets? (not just the Jumbos.) Though I think Jumbos are cool topics too. Does the photoerosion also address them? The proportion of jumbos to rogue planets in this sample doesn't seem to match that of binary/multiple stars vs single stars.
That strains such credulity although you guys are on the right track that they form in binaries because they are like stars they were supposed to be stars. Plasma cosmology states that the difference in some of these stars are just their location on a Birkeland current or not
Nope, plasma cosmology is a long since failed hypothesis that had very few adherents. They never said that, though. Only a bunch of unpublished, unqualified mythologists known as 'electric universe' claim that.
Here is a clue for the hard of (plasma) physics;
Birkeland currents are an induced effect that only exist within planetary magnetospheres. Stars are observed to form in molecular clouds. Those clouds are very cold (~ 10-50 K), and overwhelmingly neutral gas. Ionisation fraction? ~ 1 part in many millions. Not even a plasma. And no currents.
Lol! Stars form in molecular clouds. As observed. They are cold (~ 10-50 K), dense clouds of neutral gas. Not even a plasma. Ionisation fraction of 1 part in many millions. No currents. And Birkeland currents only exist in planetary magnetospheres. Nowhere else. Learn plasma physics. As a retired plasma physicist I am happy to help :)
Plasma cosmology is a long since failed hypothesis that had very few adherents. It was started by Hannes Alfven and Oskar Klein. Neither of whom thought stars formed in currents. And Alfven certainly knew that Birkeland currents, as they became known, only exist in planetary magnetospheres. And knew that stars are powered by fusion in their cores. I think you are getting mixed up with the neo-Velikovskian cult known as 'electric universe'. Which is on the same level as flat earth.
Smaller stuff gets bigger. I suspect many of these these will eventually coalesce into stars. Star seeds, if you will.
I'm reserved on the 'failed star' explanation. A binary FFP scenario = more likely.
I've been arguing the direct-collapse explanation for primordial BHs for 10yrs +, maybe before any1 else had. Just didn't get the recognition cuz of lack of 'peer review'... This is likely the same thing, direct-collapse FFPs.
They're prob binary due to shape/distribution and gravitational co-influence on the aggregating interstellar debris/dust. Since they're the closest to one-another: the planet either sheers in 2x (uncommonly) OR the debris aggregates in 2+ spots early on, and once it reaches high enough gravity, they co-orbit one another...if there were 2+, then 3body problem = the 3rd+ gets ejected from the 'system' or absorbed into one...Leaving a binary FFP system.
Wow so cool!!!
The radio emissions might suggest a strong magnetic field from these planets or failed stars. Maybe the binaries interact with each other, well, surely.
Space fleets on fire in the shoulder of Orion. Blade Runner.
Gravity might not have isotopes but it does appear that there is something strange about gravity that could possibly put it into different categories such as gravity one, two or three. Possibly being a keyword.
Awesomeness!!
Any reason why the process that forms stars couldn't also happen in more rarefied regions leading to binary sub-stars forming the same way as binary star systems form?
"Attack ships on fire off the shoulders of Orion"
The seeds of future stars? Pretty sure stars don't just pop into existence. There has to be some sort of proto-star stage.
Wow... what is the visual at 5:13?
Imagine all the planets and moons orbiting those two jumbos in the image. You think any goldilocks zones exist around those two? I do. Any life ,plant life or other would be resilient against radiation though. ~Alaska
Which nearby larger star could have photo-eroded them?
so what is the difference in how they emit radio waves and how brown and red dwarfs do ? how is it different from other jupiter and larger planets ? is there anything it is similar to ?
Or maybe it is the other way around. Could be jumbos form from a certain type of explosion or collapse. If a specific type of stars life ends. It produces enough gas in the right places to form jumbos. Or the gas it produces is from a very unform nature. I assume that uniform clouds have much higher chance creating many small objects.
Is it possible the radio emissions are from super-charged auroras generated by super-charged magnetic fields inside these objects?
Superb
wow!!! finding one or two binary planets would be amazing, but 40+ .. awesome
The bling in Orion’s Belt?
Planet sized von Newman machines are multiplying too fast 😂
could this be a way some stars are made, by joining together over time building enough mass to make a star?
If they aren't orbiting a star how can they possibly be called "planets?" It's literally the first part of NASA's definition.
Not NASA's, but International Astronomical Union. And even then, the part of a definition of a planet is that it's in orbit around our Sun. Meaning that, by this definition, exoplanets are not planets.
Just goes to show that definitions and semantics just need to be officially updated, like it happened to dwarf planets.
The Greek word planet' or 'planetes' means "wanderer" I would say' as long as it's moving' wandering' and within size category' it could be called a planet, orbital or rogue.
They could be very old cooled down white dwarf stars where they where big hot fast burning stars that went through their main sequence life fast and then collapsed in to white dwarfs but since most stars are double stars these both lived fast and both tuned in to white dwarf stars together and started to cool down and orbited each other in the Orion Nebula producing radio waves as they cool and spin fast like a Neutron star but now very cool running out of the heat they once had millions of years before?
They could even be a odd class of brown dwarf stars we not seen before?
I bet when the binaries form, perhaps before the sun adds enough mass, they orbit eachother with enough forcel to slowly propel themselves out of the stars gravity.
Seems a spooky coincidence that the meaning of life, the universe and everything is also…. …42
Conclusion, there's a lot of things going on in the depths of the universe that we don't understand and probably don't need to know about. Meanwhile, back inside our skulls 💀
Yes, if something is complex, best to just forget about it. Surely "God" wouldn't want us to know it anyway.
Glad that's not the prevailing sentiment, or we'd still be banging rocks together to make fire.
Very interesting, who give name Jambo? If he do it, that was gipsy, V
I know what those objects are! They're Frisbee's! If one of them is Green & Blue with a black lightning strike painted on it, that's mine. Dido on the accolades.
Are they still U.F.O when in space?
🙋🏽♀️anton everyday
I wonder if this might point to some of our Solar systems gas giants having been captured.
Ur mum's a gas giant.
Orbits are too circular for that. Look at Dagon or HD 80606b for potential captured planets
My guess, they're stars that are forming it didn't form all the way? Idk, I am NOT an expert in anything other than Elder Scrolls lore lmao.
Mini moon you complete me.
Strom grand sphere?
I don't like the first explanation, if they said the pair was unlucky and hit by the blast of a nearby star and the pair tumbled away drawing on the other's gravitational pull, to me, sounds more plausible.
Electric Universe hypothesis: They are born like pearls on a necklace of high current filaments (like the ones seen in the "cosmic web"), twisting around each other in spiral paths. Z pinches compress the matter into these planet sizes. The matter is aggregated through Marklund convection. The different types of matter, amounts, the intensity of the current and frequencies, determine what kind of (unique) object is created.
That's a great summary. Electric forces play a much larger role in the universe than mainstream science acknowledges. Powerful electric currents connect planets, stars, and even galaxies, forming this huge, dynamic web. This could explain some cosmic phenomena in ways gravity-based models have always struggled with...
Lol! EU is a mythology-based cult. And how are you getting currents in molecular clouds where stars are observed to form? They are cold ( ~10-50 K), dense clouds of NEUTRAL gas. Ionisation fraction of 1 part in many millions. Any currents would be blindingly obvious. As well as being impossible!
And the cosmic web is no sort of current. At least, not according to anyone familiar with it.
@@tatan0x _"Powerful electric currents connect planets, stars, and even galaxies"_
No they don't. Learn plasma physics. Plasmas are quasi-neutral. There are no currents connecting planets, stars or galaxies. That is not only impossible, but would be very obvious.
Rogue planets a lot of resourses just traveling around
Rogue spacecraft traveling in pairs.
This topic and runthrough has to be one of your best ever! I mean, 500+??? Amazing. Also, did I hear you say you do some of those animations yourself? Sweet. Thanks Anton!
is this Gary Sudbrink?
Orion huh? Full of Wandering Earth's, huh? With lots of radio light (is it like a radio glowing in the dark?)... must be aliens.
If planets could be created without a star's planetary disk, and all of these dark objects could be lumped with the dark objects produced over the generations of stars through time, would there be enough mass to produce the gravitational effects we see today, without the effects of up until now unseen, dark matter?
In a word, no. Not even close. One thing we do know is that whatever dark matter is, it is not 'normal' (i.e. baryonic) matter. When we see galaxy clusters collide, we see the 'normal' matter get hung up in the middle of the collision, as it interacts with the other 'normal' matter in what it is colliding with. However, when we look at gravitational lensing observations of the aftermath of those collisions, the vast majority of the mass is on the periphery, and not where the 'normal' matter is. So, it isn't interacting with 'normal' matter, and is not reacting electromagnetically.
As a check, we can look at non-colliding clusters and see the mass to be evenly distributed. So, that is a very strong argument for DM having mass, but not being 'normal' matter.
I wonder if the rogue planet discovered by an Einstein Ring effect might even be a (mythical?) planetary mass black hole left over from the Big Bang early days.
{o.o}
👍⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐EXCELLENT WORK ANTON!! I LOOK FORWARD TO NEW VIDEOS! THANK YOU
A New Class of Objects! In 2024, I can't believe it. There's so many in M42 they have to form as Binaries. How about H.R.B's - Hot Radio Binaries. A whole New Class of Astronomers specializing in these objects could emerge.
Orion Nebula? Hell there here.
Bright Dwarf Binaries.
This is one thing that's always bothered me about "dark matter" How do we know there's not just a lot more baryonic matter in the universe? Maybe our solar system is uniquely sparse compared to most stars. Maybe most stars actually have hundreds of small body rocky planets like earth, and our system is different because we had some sort of close encounter billions of years ago that kicked out 90% of the mass?
Because lensing observations of colliding galaxy clusters tells us that whatever DM is, it is not 'normal' matter.
Alien mega structures?😊