“Sensationalist crap”…. What part of this do you disagree with? Perhaps a more important question is what education or skill set do you specifically have or hold that qualifies you to be so dismissive of this technology?
To the researchers in this video, I have witnessed and have some knowledge of some very advanced drones. They are capable of achieving what you are trying to do. In 2014 I saw a large group gliding just a few inches above the dirt surface without leaving a trail or making a sound. I have some close of photos.
13:43 "look at 9/11" very poor choice of reference, self-flying plane can also be hijacked and systems can be hacked or manipulated to create the same act.
Well, he talks aboit such system that prevents such situation: the automatic system should recognize that the plane is about to hit something and then change the course. It is still vulnerable for spoofing, but there is no perfect solution. So it is rather good example. Especially if you consider simple hijacking plane. Not perfect though.
Simple answer is yes. I’ll add what was said in the early 1900s about the car replacing the horse: “You don’t have to fetch it, you don’t have to feed it” Remember this, mark my words.
With these gas prices, I think I would actually prefer the carrots! But yes I agree - there was a time when cars were thought impossible and computers not even imaginable. Everything comes to fruition
It his happening today in Ukraine. I foresaw this back in 1996, participating in digital imaging algorithms. I was scared back then and I am scared today - and I wish us, including Ukraine, all the best in this.
I noticed a lot of channels are reuploading stuff that's from the past but relevant now and a lot of these so-called news channels started about 10 to 13 years ago. They all seem to have started around the same time.
The robot wars have finally came! We phase out death and risk of human life and fight with only robots. Along the way we make some of the most terrific robotic advancements.
As my dad use to say. Where there's a will there's a way. I think it was either Microsoft or IBM that made a system they called un hackable literally.... it was then hacked something like immediately after release lol
hence the counter measure anti drone swarm / weapon interface tech which runs on an entire different radio wave frequency to avoid being vulnerable to the same said “hack”. sadly we must adapt to this future we are approaching but thankfully you can fight fire with in this case fire and have them cancel out.
actually over RF they use military standard encryption and same can be done by satellites so its a secure datalink but of course encryption isn't 100% secure but it allows your frequency not to be hijacked in a way that someone else could take control of it. If anti jammimg is needed then the drone requires a anti jamming receiver than can still receive signal in high EW enviornment bae systems (NavStorm-M) has invented such receiver that is not only for drones but missiles, artillery shells, air to surface bombs too that use GPS for guidance the reason why american American Excalibur shell failed in Ukraine to the point where they stopped using it was because of jamming it while in flight since it wasn't built for that. Due to that it lost out on CEP and the margin of error was more than 4 m than said for it so it probably was off by target over 10 meters or so. Not good
how could this be possible? doing research for NATO and claiming there isn't military interest. and the host accepts this answer without challenge. disingenuous.
If you think your enemies aren't working on this technology, you are the proverbial ostrich with his head in the sand. You'd better hope your side is on the leading edge of it because it's here, no matter how much you wish it wasn't.
"Yeah my technology has the potential to be used to allow for more indiscriminate killing on a mass autonomous scale, but uh we're not developing it for that reason..."
“Delegate the decision of life and death to a robot”…? Does this lady not know that it’s still someone pulling the trigger or ordering the strike or approving the mission??????? The exact same thing can be said about a gun, a pitchfork, an arrow, a rock, your frigging fist.
What they meant is AI can be trained to recognize threat signatures better than humans. If you're going after threat signatures anyways, increasing accuracy (casualty reduction) would be a benefit
21:52 Don't say that he's hypocritical, Say rather that he's apolitical. "Once the rockets are up, who cares where they come down? That's not my department, " says Wernher von Braun. -Tom Lehrer
Would you like constant zooming of drones above your heads, and accidents where drones crash on buildings, people etc. And those drones would need safe AI to navigate and charging/storage infrastructure
Sea forces now employ clusters of low profile surface combatants. They are not preloaded suicide expendables, but they don't have to be. They can be recon or mine laying or even sonar buoy laying or they could theoretically be a floating platform for multiple quad copter Mavic deployments. Just like the US air force is looking at making the B21 next generation strategic bomber fleet to also be the motherships to deploying UAV escort stealth aircraft.
For 2.5 years you have a intense drone war going on between Russia and Ukraine. Today several drones targeted strategic bomber Olenya airfield on Kola peninsula. That's artic circle!
Save the students of Bangladesh from police brutality. There are anti government protests going on right now and the country is under dictatorship rule. Please spread the awareness. Much love
I don't understand the convenient moral and ethical stances of my fellow scientists here. Everyone says "Yeah the cool technologies we're totally hyped about could be used for weapons technology, but that's not what *we're* doing over here". My guy, you're working on government NSF contracts and/or for NATO. Just stand your ground and honestly state the full capabilities of your work. Leave it to us to opine on its ethic.
you have to put the upload date of your videos, especially if it relates to text. nearly everything in this video is outdated, this should labelled as a historical piece. Vice, i know you don't make any worthwhile videos anymore, not like you used to, but at least clearly date the video in the title. now i assume every vice video in my feed is old
Because non AI / humans are slow learners, forget everything then repeat errors over and over again ... Do I need to add orangeman into the equaton just to make my point? 😉
You can program 'Ethics' into a machine, sure. The problem is that there isn't an objective moral code for all humanity. Ethics, like beauty, are in the eye of the beholder. What I might deem Ethical you might deem Unethical, and vice versa. See the issue?
There are benefits to switching to precise predictable systems. The risk is not the control system. The risk is lowering the cost of taking violent action. This will make violent attacks more common because we won't have to risk our lives The George Tech professor is completely rught. It's relatively trivial to create planes and cars that cannot from hitting buildings. We don't have to turn 100% control we just need to build in more guardrails.
Dude it’s not the future it’s now
"This episode of Cyberwar originally aired in 2016."
Very troubling that it is now 2024 and 8 years have passed since this first aired and things are moving fast.
Yea I know a guy from Ukraine..they already use robot dogs in the war
Drone warfare is just scary 😢
It’s so awesome watching old news stories
Guys we've gone through this already. It's Skynet 🤦
So vice is just reuploading sensationalist crap from 8 years ago? Have they really run out of any new material?
I mean which news source isnt sensationalist? Can you see how this reupload might be applicable to stuff going on right now?
use the YT dude, see why they are reuping it ;)
Pretty sure they went belly up a while ago 😂😂😂
Turns out it was not sensationalist at all, but understated. Drones are taking over.
“Sensationalist crap”…. What part of this do you disagree with? Perhaps a more important question is what education or skill set do you specifically have or hold that qualifies you to be so dismissive of this technology?
"Hey look, that must be Amazon with my package!"
"..."
"..."
"Wait a minute..."
"This must be Brazil!!!"
To the researchers in this video, I have witnessed and have some knowledge of some very advanced drones. They are capable of achieving what you are trying to do. In 2014 I saw a large group gliding just a few inches above the dirt surface without leaving a trail or making a sound. I have some close of photos.
13:43 "look at 9/11" very poor choice of reference, self-flying plane can also be hijacked and systems can be hacked or manipulated to create the same act.
No commercial plane in more susceptible of being hacked then physically hijacked.
Well, he talks aboit such system that prevents such situation: the automatic system should recognize that the plane is about to hit something and then change the course. It is still vulnerable for spoofing, but there is no perfect solution. So it is rather good example. Especially if you consider simple hijacking plane. Not perfect though.
@@malakoihebraico2150 I DONT THINK YOU CAN HACK A WHOLE PLANE IMMA GO LOOK IT UP
@@2muchtalentclips That was my point
9years old. What a joke
I mean they went bankrupt. What did you expect? Fresh new content every day from a bankrupt company?
@@ParkerVRGT a video explaining how they became bankrupt lol it might ironically become relevant in a little bit here...
@@acabbagemerchant that's a good point
Why is it a joke? Its more relevant than ever and needs deep thought and societal engagement.
@@acabbagemerchant💀✅
Simple answer is yes.
I’ll add what was said in the early 1900s about the car replacing the horse:
“You don’t have to fetch it, you don’t have to feed it”
Remember this, mark my words.
With these gas prices, I think I would actually prefer the carrots! But yes I agree - there was a time when cars were thought impossible and computers not even imaginable. Everything comes to fruition
And no bloodshed, drons fighting each other
Omg. They finally put a date showing this is a old video. 👍🏿
2016?😂 Imagine how things have changed in 8 years.
how could someone who seems so smart be so naive that lady needs a reality check
We’ve had drones for decades. Back in 1992, we used them in Desert Storm over Iraq. Today, they’re much more compact, cheaper and plentiful.
Drones has been around since World War I
The term drone is just an autonomous flying thing, this is a different era. We never had digital technology and AI that could run them
@@carpo719 never had digital? Perhaps not on the civilian world. The military used digital applications well before of what you see today.
@@jamram9924 You talking about the remote controlled landmines with threads?
@@carpo719 digital technology? Exactly what do you mean? Autonomous systems to say search for enemies and such is what you mean?
It his happening today in Ukraine. I foresaw this back in 1996, participating in digital imaging algorithms. I was scared back then and I am scared today - and I wish us, including Ukraine, all the best in this.
Little bit late. Drone warfare has been around for a while
U must be slow...this aired in 2016 and is reuploaded. It even said it in the beginning. Read.
@@detonater1348 Yes I know… drones have been around since the early 2000’s
My name is John Connor, don't do this!!!
🤣
More like Meow Connor
arms spaghetti
@@doz3r943 yes you definitely have spaghetti arms compared to me soy boy
The buzz and pitch of a FPV drones is nightmare fuel...terrifying really.
I noticed a lot of channels are reuploading stuff that's from the past but relevant now and a lot of these so-called news channels started about 10 to 13 years ago. They all seem to have started around the same time.
I have achieved swarm drone formations using UWB modules, along with AI/Yolo locking tech. It's mind blowing.
The robot wars have finally came! We phase out death and risk of human life and fight with only robots. Along the way we make some of the most terrific robotic advancements.
Imagine anything from embassies to power stations being patroled by drones
Fractal mathematical expressions to coordinate masses of individual identical elements to perform in synchronization.
number 2 at defence referencing ironman is crazy
If your drone swarm has been hacked, do you honestly believe the kill switch won't be compromised too?
As he said, it must be Ironclad to work. "Hacked" is not universal, it might have many layers that make it mostly impossible to hack.
As my dad use to say. Where there's a will there's a way. I think it was either Microsoft or IBM that made a system they called un hackable literally.... it was then hacked something like immediately after release lol
hence the counter measure anti drone swarm / weapon interface tech which runs on an entire different radio wave frequency to avoid being vulnerable to the same said “hack”. sadly we must adapt to this future we are approaching but thankfully you can fight fire with in this case fire and have them cancel out.
Can satellites link hackable? If yes then drones can , it's connected via satellite links not by internet
actually over RF they use military standard encryption and same can be done by satellites so its a secure datalink but of course encryption isn't 100% secure but it allows your frequency not to be hijacked in a way that someone else could take control of it. If anti jammimg is needed then the drone requires a anti jamming receiver than can still receive signal in high EW enviornment bae systems (NavStorm-M) has invented such receiver that is not only for drones but missiles, artillery shells, air to surface bombs too that use GPS for guidance the reason why american American Excalibur shell failed in Ukraine to the point where they stopped using it was because of jamming it while in flight since it wasn't built for that. Due to that it lost out on CEP and the margin of error was more than 4 m than said for it so it probably was off by target over 10 meters or so. Not good
"Birds follow a set of rules" is Gendo Ikari thinking.
"Do you think it's a possibility they'd be weaponized?" Bro, that's some deep and pro journalism right there.
Lmao this guy gonna be like Oppenheimer
TERMINATOR IS COMING ALIVE 🤦♀️🤷🤯
how could this be possible? doing research for NATO and claiming there isn't military interest. and the host accepts this answer without challenge. disingenuous.
Black ops 2 predicted
Telling people not to use technology is like telling the first man on Earth not to use fire.
To be fair, the first man on Earth didn't use fire, or have language to even understand what you would have been telling him.
Imagine being chased by swarm of drones and 🔫 attached with it... It would be scary
Amazing drone
Drones can be disabled by EMP a massive electromagnetic pulse that can fly miniature circuitry.
If you think your enemies aren't working on this technology, you are the proverbial ostrich with his head in the sand. You'd better hope your side is on the leading edge of it because it's here, no matter how much you wish it wasn't.
Scary.
Instead of going to a minefield now the minefield come to you.
"Yeah my technology has the potential to be used to allow for more indiscriminate killing on a mass autonomous scale, but uh we're not developing it for that reason..."
“Delegate the decision of life and death to a robot”…? Does this lady not know that it’s still someone pulling the trigger or ordering the strike or approving the mission??????? The exact same thing can be said about a gun, a pitchfork, an arrow, a rock, your frigging fist.
I found the same to be true for explosive frogs
What they meant is AI can be trained to recognize threat signatures better than humans. If you're going after threat signatures anyways, increasing accuracy (casualty reduction) would be a benefit
They are already fighting the wars of today.
21:52 Don't say that he's hypocritical,
Say rather that he's apolitical.
"Once the rockets are up, who cares where they come down?
That's not my department, " says Wernher von Braun. -Tom Lehrer
It's not the warrior, it's the logistics. The warrior might kill a few folks. The logistics kills millions.
I hope so these contracts aren’t paying enough
Our mission is clear. To build and maintain those robots.
Remember when drones were going to bring us gifts and packages? Didn’t know it was going to wrapped explosive.
Would you like constant zooming of drones above your heads, and accidents where drones crash on buildings, people etc.
And those drones would need safe AI to navigate and charging/storage infrastructure
everything about humans is war and to kill others...when will you mofos learn to nurture life
Drone's take away any responsibility / liability it's more of a war of man against machine, battle of the botts.
No they don’t. Similarly, a dog can’t be accountable for biting someone but it’s owner can.
19:07 “great powers like Russia” great sign that this clip was way in the past
That future is already here. Wait till they become autonomous.
11:00 no one is saying that drone warfare is more humane. It definitely is more effective than regular humans
Vice, so self-important and dramatic! Sometimes warranted, sometimes a touch much.
There will be No winners Only survivors....
Which stocks should I purchase?
Gold.
Sea forces now employ clusters of low profile surface combatants. They are not preloaded suicide expendables, but they don't have to be. They can be recon or mine laying or even sonar buoy laying or they could theoretically be a floating platform for multiple quad copter Mavic deployments.
Just like the US air force is looking at making the B21 next generation strategic bomber fleet to also be the motherships to deploying UAV escort stealth aircraft.
The way he says murder at minute 12:00 and smiles… and that convo that comes after… cringe.
high explosives fight wars everything else is just delivery of high explosives 💣 💣
Ron we’re all counting on you bud 👀
Pandora’s Box…🎁
DUH! What do you think- it's happening right NOW!!!
If the plane in the thumbnail isn't upside down then the answer is yes
John Potter te ocupamos en Sinaloa viejon
Time to update this topic. It’s crazy how far we’ve come!
I would like to see robots picking up trash because people don't do it
That would be pointless if robots fights future wars what’s the point bots taking out bots we might as well playing video games against each other
People don't cry over robots
Bro 😂 we are actually in the 2024 movies we’re talking about, just a little slower
Fargin' old vid.
The simple answer is who ever is the cheapest will fight, as long as the supply is keeping up.
B2 and F35 will become Drones. Robots can't believe humans have the power to choose over life and death. 😅
For 2.5 years you have a intense drone war going on between Russia and Ukraine. Today several drones targeted strategic bomber Olenya airfield on Kola peninsula. That's artic circle!
They already are. They should make it illegal.
arms spaghetti
war is the only event we humans are good at.
We all know you can't put the genie back in the bottle. Weird future coming
While us going ...
This is happening there is no stopping it
These types of videos are such a waste. "Should we be doing X". We don't have a choice. If we don't, they will.
Just remember what happened to Einstein, Ofcourse humans will weaponise the invention
I fear if we set boundaries to when not to kill, your enemies are going to exploit those boundaries to overcome your robots..
...and then a race to the bottom
Save the students of Bangladesh from police brutality. There are anti government protests going on right now and the country is under dictatorship rule. Please spread the awareness. Much love
Vice is releasing old videos because the new ones just are as good.
Where’s Sarah Conner at!
Harry Kane is surprised by autonomous flying drones.
I don't understand the convenient moral and ethical stances of my fellow scientists here. Everyone says "Yeah the cool technologies we're totally hyped about could be used for weapons technology, but that's not what *we're* doing over here". My guy, you're working on government NSF contracts and/or for NATO. Just stand your ground and honestly state the full capabilities of your work. Leave it to us to opine on its ethic.
If we're being told about it it's 1000x more advanced and definitely too late to stop
20:00 absolute unit
Chills
A whole 22min doc about brutal use of autonomous warfare & drones and not one mention of Israel and Palestine.. in 2024. Imagine that
Because this is a repost from 2016 as it stated in the first frame of the video. Take your virtue signaling elsewhere;)
Because people want to have a life that's not politically influenced
Yes. They've already begun, especially if we're (commoners) are being asked such a question concerning warfare
Let's get a 2024 update here. Please and thanks.
Works for nato which is a military organisation funded out of defence budgets but doesn’t know if his technology will be used for military 😂
Probably just trying to cope so he can sleep at night
They already are. Eat it.
Terminators
The United States should be ashamed of themselves.
dude we are literally in the Ace Combat universe now
Yes
you have to put the upload date of your videos, especially if it relates to text. nearly everything in this video is outdated, this should labelled as a historical piece.
Vice, i know you don't make any worthwhile videos anymore, not like you used to, but at least clearly date the video in the title. now i assume every vice video in my feed is old
_Why_ is this channel just reuploading everything?
Because non AI / humans are slow learners, forget everything then repeat errors over and over again ... Do I need to add orangeman into the equaton just to make my point? 😉
You can program 'Ethics' into a machine, sure. The problem is that there isn't an objective moral code for all humanity. Ethics, like beauty, are in the eye of the beholder. What I might deem Ethical you might deem Unethical, and vice versa. See the issue?
what was the censored word at 2:32?
Great timely video. The world is on the edge of change in warfare in all modes of combat
There are benefits to switching to precise predictable systems. The risk is not the control system. The risk is lowering the cost of taking violent action. This will make violent attacks more common because we won't have to risk our lives
The George Tech professor is completely rught. It's relatively trivial to create planes and cars that cannot from hitting buildings. We don't have to turn 100% control we just need to build in more guardrails.
it will save precious lives of personnel
I hope we get bored of war